Six Page APA Paper Format With A Strong Thesis (Not Including The Title And Reference Pages). The Description Is Below:
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mme… 1/217
Moment/Getty images; blackzheep/Shutterstock.com
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mme… 2/217
The Leadership Experience
7th Edition
Richard L. Daft Owen Graduate School of Management Vanderbilt University
With the assistance of Patricia G. Lane
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mme… 3/217
Copyright Statement
Erin Joyner Vice President, General Manager, Social Science & Qualitative Business
Jason Fremder Product Director
Mike Roche Product Manager
Jamie Mack Content Developer
Allie Janneck Product Assistant
Kristen Hurd Marketing Director
Emily Horowitz Marketing Manager
Casey Binder Marketing Coordinator
Cenveo Publisher Services Art and Cover Direction, Production Management, and Composition
Intellectual Property
Diane Garrity Analyst
Sarah Shainwald Project Manager
Ron Montgomery Manufacturing Planner
Cover Image(s) Moment/Getty Images; blackzheep/Shutterstock.com Interior design credits Design Pics/The Irish Image Collection/Getty Images; Steve Weinrebe/Photographer's Choice RF/Getty Images; Bastar/Vetta/Getty Images; Vinimay Kaul/EyeEm/Getty Images; Matic Stojs / ShutterStock.com
The Leadership Experience COPYRIGHT © 2018, 2015 Cengage Learning®
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, except as permitted by U.S. copyright law, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner.
For product information and technology assistance, contact us at Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706
For permission to use material from this text or product, submit all requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions (http://www.cengage.com/permissions)
Further permissions questions can be emailed to [email protected] (http://[email protected])
Library of Congress Control Number: 2016940679
ISBN: 978-1-337-70028-3
Cengage Learning
20 Channel Center Street
Boston MA 02210
USA
Cengage Learning is a leading provider of customized learning solutions with employees residing in nearly 40 different countries and sales in more than 125 countries around the world. Find your local representative at www.cengage.com (http://www.cengage.com) .
Cengage Learning products are represented in Canada by Nelson Education, Ltd.
To learn more about Cengage Learning Solutions, visit www.cengage.com (http://www.cengage.com)
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mme… 4/217
Purchase any of our products at your local college store or at our preferred online store www.cengagebrain.com (http://www.cengagebrain.com)
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mme… 5/217
To the spiritual leaders who shaped my growth and development as a leader and as a human being.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mme… 6/217
About the author Richard L. Daft, Ph.D., is the Brownlee O. Currey, Jr., Professor of Management and Principal Senior Lecturer in the Owen Graduate School of Management at Vanderbilt University. Professor Daft specializes in the study of leadership and organization theory. Dr. Daft is a Fellow of the Academy of Management and has served on the editorial boards of Academy of Management Journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, and Journal of Management Education. He also served as the associate dean at the Owen School, was the associate editor-in-chief of Organization Science, and served for three years as associate editor of Administrative Science Quarterly.
Professor Daft has authored or coauthored 14 books. His latest books include The Executive and the Elephant: A Leader's Guide to Building Inner Excellence (Jossey-Bass, 2010) and Building Management Skills: An Action First Approach (with Dorothy Marcic, Cengage/Southwest, 2014). He is also the author of Organization Theory and Design (Cengage/Southwest, 2016), Management (Cengage/Southwest, 2018), and Fusion Leadership: Unlocking the Subtle Forces That Change People and Organizations (with Robert Lengel, Berrett-Koehler, 2000). He has also authored dozens of scholarly articles, papers, and chapters. His work has been published in Organizational Dynamics, Administrative Science Quarterly, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Management, Accounting Organizations and Society, Management Science, MIS Quarterly, California Management Review, Leadership Excellence, Leader to Leader, and Organizational Behavior Teaching Review.
Dr. Daft also is an active teacher and consultant. He has taught leadership, leading change, management, organizational theory, and organizational behavior. He has also produced for-pro�it theatrical productions and helped manage a start-up enterprise. He has been involved in management development and consulting for many companies and government organizations, including the National Academy of Science, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, American Banking Association, AutoZone, Aegis Technology, Bell Canada, Aluminum Bahrain (Alba), Bridgestone, TVA, Cardinal Healthcare, Pratt & Whitney, Allstate Insurance, State Farm Insurance, the United States Air Force, the U.S. Army, Central Parking System, USAA, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Vulcan Materials, and the Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mme… 7/217
Preface Many leaders have recently had their assumptions challenged about how organizations succeed. Leaders are struggling to make sense of the shifting environment and to learn how to lead the people in their companies effectively and successfully in the midst of turmoil. The crisis in the housing, mortgage, and �inance industries and resulting recession; volatile oil prices; ethical scandals; political turmoil; and other events have dramatically shifted the organizational and economic landscape. This edition of The Leadership Experience addresses themes and issues that are directly relevant to the current turbulent environment. My vision for the seventh edition is to give students an exciting, applied, and comprehensive view of what leadership is like in today's world. The Leadership Experience integrates recent ideas and applications with established scholarly research in a way that makes the topic of leadership come alive. Organizations are undergoing major changes, and this textbook addresses the qualities and skills leaders need in this rapidly evolving world.
Recent chaotic events, combined with factors such as a growing need for creativity and innovation in organizations, the rise of social media, the growth of e-business and mobile commerce, the use of virtual teams and telecommuting, globalization, the growing problem of cybercrime, and other ongoing transformations place new demands on leaders that go far beyond the topics traditionally taught in courses on management or organizational behavior. My experiences teaching leadership to students and managers, and working with leaders to change their organizations, have af�irmed for me the value of traditional leadership concepts while highlighting the importance of including new ideas and applications.
The Leadership Experience thoroughly covers the history of leadership studies and the traditional theories but goes beyond that to incorporate valuable ideas such as leadership vision, shaping culture and values, leadership courage, and the importance of moral leadership. The book expands the treatment of leadership to capture the excitement of the subject in a way that motivates students and challenges them to develop their leadership potential.
New to the Seventh Edition
A primary focus for revising The Leadership Experience, seventh edition, has been to relate leadership concepts and theories to real events in today's turbulent environment. Each chapter has been revised and updated to bring in current issues and events that leaders are facing.
Topics and application examples that have been added or expanded in the seventh edition include:
developing a global mindset
leading with humility
leadership courage as a skill
the in�luence of emotions on performance
the importance of self-awareness for leadership
entrepreneurial leadership
overcoming bias in the workplace
candid communication
how leaders use social media
leadership coaching
balancing con�lict and cooperation
agile leadership
fostering a thriving workforce
team competencies
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mme… 8/217
how to confront others during con�lict
diversity of thought
co-creating a vision
building a high-performance culture through values and results
the mental transition required for people to change behavior
using a positive emotional attractor
Some of the new examples of leaders and leadership within organizations that show practical applications of key concepts include:
Pope Francis
Mickey Drexler, J. Crew
Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway
Satya Nadella, Microsoft
Laura Smith, Yola
Nancy Dubec, A&E Networks
Angela Ahrendts, Apple
Coach Ron Rivera, Carolina Panthers
Chade-Meng Tan, Google
Kip Tindell, Container Store
Gen. Stanley McChrystal, U. S. Army
Rich Gee, Rich Gee Group
Dan Price, Gravity Payments
Grant Reid, Mars Inc
Zingerman's
Honda Engine Plant
Seattle Seahawks
Earl's Restaurants
Mattel Toys
Chris Rufer, Morning Star
Golden State Warriors
Vivek Gupta, Zensar Technologies
Inga Beale, Lloyd's of London
Intel
HealthFitness
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mme… 9/217
Norman Seabrook, Riker's Island
Dick Costolo, Twitter
BNSF Railway
Rui Sousa, Ronnie McKnight,Tom Camp, UPS
Natarajan Chandrasekaran, Tata Consultancy
Marvin Ellison, J. C. Penney
Jon Fairest, Sano�i Canada
The Leadership Experience continues to offer students great opportunities for self-assessment and leadership development. An important aspect of learning to be a leader involves looking inward for greater self-understanding, and the seventh edition provides many opportunities for this type of re�lection. Each chapter includes multiple questionnaires or exercises that enable students to learn about their own leadership beliefs, values, competencies, and skills. These exercises help students gauge their current standing and connect the chapter concepts and examples to ideas for expanding their own leadership abilities. A few of the self-assessment topics involve engagement, networking, ethical maturity, personality traits, leading diverse people, developing a personal vision, spiritual leadership, candor, leadership courage, optimism, and leading with love versus leading with fear. Self-assessments related to basic leadership abilities such as listening skills, emotional intelligence, motivating others, and using power and in�luence are also included. Additional self-assessments are available within MindTap.
Organization
The organization of the book is based on �irst understanding basic ways in which leaders differ from managers, and the ways leaders set direction, seek alignment between organizations and followers, build relationships, and create change. Thus, the organization of this book is in �ive parts:
1. Introduction to Leadership
2. Research Perspectives on Leadership
3. The Personal Side of Leadership
4. The Leader as a Relationship Builder
5. The Leader as Social Architect
The book integrates materials from both micro and macro approaches to leadership, from both academia and the real world, and from traditional ideas and recent thinking.
Distinguishing Features
This book has a number of special features that are designed to make the material accessible and valuable to students.
In the Lead The Leadership Experience is loaded with new examples of leaders in both traditional and contemporary organizations. Each chapter opens with a real-life example that relates to the chapter content, and several additional examples are highlighted within each chapter. These examples are drawn from a wide variety of organizations including education, the military, government agencies, businesses, and nonpro�it organizations.
Consider This! Each chapter contains a Consider This box that is personal, compelling, and inspiring. This box may be a saying from a famous leader, or wisdom from the ages. These Consider This boxes provide novel and interesting material to expand the reader's thinking about the leadership experience.
Leader's Bookshelf In this edition, six of the 15 chapters have new Leader's Bookshelf reviews. A unique feature of The Leadership Experience is that each chapter includes a review of a recent book relevant to the chapter's content. The Leader's Bookshelf connects students to issues and topics being read and discussed in the worlds of academia, business, military, education, and nonpro�it organizations.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 10/217
New Leader Action Memo This feature helps students apply the chapter concepts in their own lives and leadership activities and directs them to self-assessments related to various chapter topics.
Leader's Self-Insight These boxes provide self-assessments for learners and an opportunity to experience leadership issues in a personal way. These exercises take the form of questionnaires, scenarios, and activities.
Student Development Each chapter ends with discussion questions and then two activities for student development. The �irst, Leadership at Work, is a practical, skill-building activity that engages the student in applying chapter concepts to real-life leadership. These exercises are designed so students can complete them on their own outside of class or in class as part of a group activity. Instructor tips are given for maximizing in-class learning with the Leadership at Work exercises. Leadership Development: Cases for Analysis, the second end-of-chapter activity, provides two short, problem-oriented cases for analysis. These cases test the student's ability to apply concepts when dealing with real-life leadership issues. The cases challenge the student's cognitive understanding of leadership ideas while the Leadership at Work exercises and the feedback questionnaires assess the student's progress as a leader.
Business Insights: Essentials' intuitive user interface makes it easy for students and instructors to search and �ind in-depth information on businesses, industries, and products. Features and bene�its include the ability to search across multiple data types from a single search box with targeted search options by category. This includes company information, articles, industry data, SWOT Reports, Thomson Reuters Company Financials and Investment Reports, Market Share Reports, and Industry Essays. We have created assignments based on articles that connect directly with the content covered in your text, including assessment questions to test students on their knowledge of the content and emphasizing real-world examples.
MindTap® Management for Daft's The Leadership Experience, 7th Edition, is the digital learning solution that helps instructors to engage and transform today's students into critical thinkers. Through paths of dynamic assignments and applications that you can personalize, real-time course analytics, and an accessible reader, MindTap helps you turn cookie- cutter into cutting-edge, apathy into engagement, and memorizers into higher-level thinkers.
As an instructor using MindTap, you have at your �ingertips the right content and a unique set of tools curated speci�ically for your course, all in an interface designed to improve work�low and save time when planning lessons and course structure. The control over building and personalizing your course is all yours, so you can focus on the most relevant material while also lowering costs for your students. Stay connected and informed in your course through real-time student tracking that provides the opportunity to adjust the course as needed based on analytics of interactivity in the course.
The MindTap Assignments are fully integrated with the text, providing calculated combinations of lower- and higher-order thinking skills exercises. Students can work together in the experiential exercises to create videos, write papers, deliver presentations, and more. Interactive Self-Assessments engage students by helping them make personal connections to the content presented in each chapter. A �lexible grading system offers grade analytics and grade book export tools to work with any learning management system.
Ancillaries
This edition offers a wide range of instructor ancillaries to fully enable instructors to bring the leadership experience into the classroom. These ancillaries include:
Test Bank
Cengage Learning Testing Powered by Cognero is a �lexible, online system that allows you to author, edit, and manage test bank content from multiple Cengage Learning solutions; create multiple test versions in an instant; and deliver tests from your LMS, your classroom, or wherever you want. The test bank for The Leadership Experience, seventh edition, includes approximately 60 questions per chapter to help you in writing examinations. Types of questions include true/false, multiple choice, completion, short-answer, and essay, with all questions tagged to relevant national competencies. To ensure consistency across our entire package, the content of the test bank has been fully reviewed and updated by the same authors who have crafted our new digital resources.
PowerPoint Lecture Presentations
An asset to any instructor, the PowerPoint lecture presentations include outlines for every chapter, illustrations from the text, and additional examples to provide learning opportunities for students.
Videos
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 11/217
Videos compiled speci�ically to accompany The Leadership Experience, seventh edition, allow students to engage with the textual material by applying theories and concepts to real-world situations.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 12/217
Acknowledgments Textbook writing is a team enterprise. This book has integrated ideas and support from many people whom I want to acknowledge. I want to extend special thanks to my editorial associate, Pat Lane. I could not have undertaken this revision without Pat's help. She skillfully drafted materials for the chapters, found original sources, and did an outstanding job with last- minute changes, the copyedited manuscript, art, and galley proofs. Pat's talent and personal enthusiasm for this text added greatly to its excellence.
Here at Vanderbilt I want to thank my assistant, Linda Roberts, for the tremendous volume and quality of work she accomplished on my behalf that gave me time to write. Eric Johnson, the dean at Owen, and Sal March, associate dean, have maintained a positive scholarly atmosphere and supported me with the time and resources to complete the revision of this book. I also appreciate the intellectual stimulation and support from friends and colleagues at the Owen School—Bruce Barry, Ray Friedman, Jessica Kennedy, Rich Oliver, David Owens, Ty Park, Ranga Ramanujam, Bart Victor, and Tim Vogus.
I want to acknowledge the reviewers who provided feedback. Their ideas helped me improve the book in many areas:
Thomas H. Arcy University of Houston—Central Campus Janey Ayres Purdue University Kristin Backhaus SUNY New Paltz Bill Bommer Georgia State University William Russell Brown Navarro College Jared Caughron University of Oklahoma Meredith Rentz Cook North Central Texas College Glenn K. Cunningham Duquesne University Jeffrey Fisher Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Ron Franzen Saint Luke's Hospital Adrian Guardia Texas A&M University—San Antonio Delia J. Haak John Brown University Nell Hartley Robert Morris College Ann Horn-Jeddy Medaille College Ellen Jordan Mount Olive College Alyson Livingston North Central Texas College Gregory Manora Auburn University–Montgomery Joseph Martelli The University of Findlay Richard T. Martin Washburn University Jalane Meloun Barry University Mark Nagel Normandale Community College Ranjna Patel Bethune Cookman College Chad Peterson Baylor University Gordon Riggles University of Colorado Miriam Rothman University of San Diego Bill Service Samford University Dan Sherman University of Alabama at Huntsville Bret Simmons North Dakota State University Shane Spiller University of Montevallo Shand H. Stringham Duquesne University Ahmad Tootonchi Frostburg State University Mary L. Tucker Ohio University Joseph W. Weiss Bentley University
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 13/217
Richard L. Daft, Nashville, Tennessee
Donald D. White University of Arkansas Xavier Whitaker Baylor University Jean Wilson The College of William and Mary George A. Wynn University of Tampa
The developers at Cengage Learning also deserve special mention. Senior Product Manager Mike Roche supported the concept for this book and obtained the resources necessary for its completion. Associate Content Developer Jamie Mack provided terri�ic support for the book's writing, reviews, and production.
I also thank Bob Lengel at the University of Texas at San Antonio. Bob's enthusiasm for leadership many years ago stimulated me to begin reading, teaching, and training in the area of leadership development. His enthusiasm also led to our collaboration on the book Fusion Leadership: Unlocking the Subtle Forces That Change People and Organizations. I thank Bob for keeping the leadership dream alive, which in time enabled me to pursue my dream of writing this leadership textbook.
Finally, I want to acknowledge my loving daughters Danielle, Amy, Roxanne, Solange, and Elizabeth. Although everyone is now pursuing their own lives and careers, I appreciate the good feelings and connections with my children and grandchildren. On occasion, we have been able to travel, vacation, watch a play, or just be together—all of which reconnect me to the things that really count.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 14/217
Part 1. Introduction to Leadership
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 15/217
Chapter 1 . What Does It Mean to Be a Leader?
Your Leadership Challenge After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
Understand the full meaning of leadership and see the leadership potential in yourself and others. Recognize and facilitate the six fundamental transformations in today's organizations and leaders. Identify the primary reasons for leadership derailment and the new paradigm skills that can help you avoid it. Recognize the traditional functions of management and the fundamental differences between leadership and management. Appreciate the crucial importance of providing direction, alignment, relationships, personal qualities, and outcomes. Explain how leadership has evolved and how historical approaches apply to the practice of leadership today.
Abraham Lincoln had less leadership experience than any previous president, but when historians rank the “greatest presidents,” Lincoln frequently tops the list. Interest in Lincoln's leadership swelled with the release of Steven Spielberg's historical �ilm Lincoln , which was a huge critical and commercial success, grossing more than $250 million at the box of�ice and garnering 12 Academy Award nominations. “Lincoln's presidency is a big, well-lit classroom for business leaders seeking to build successful, enduring organizations,” said Howard Schultz, CEO of Starbucks. In this era of disconnected and often morally bankrupt leaders, it is no wonder the skills, strengths, and character of Lincoln have struck a chord. Lincoln once provoked an opponent to tears by using his expert communication skills to mimic and ridicule his rival. Soon afterward, the man who would later become the 16th president of the United States felt disappointed and ashamed of his own behavior and sought out his opponent to offer an apology. Lincoln took this as a valuable lesson about channeling his emotions, practicing empathy, and using his abilities to promote good. From then on, Lincoln applied his superb leadership and communication skills to serve the higher interests of the American people rather than his own goals and ego. His ability to control his emotions and stay committed to a vision even under intense hardship, his commitment to go into the �ield and establish connections with soldiers and the general public, and his willingness to listen to different points of view and to share credit for successes and take blame for failures all tap into a deep longing within people for genuine leadership. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/cqth1�htbw3tmygwd076#KEGKCNPM5P0B40YAL557)
Nancy F. Koehn, “Lincoln's School of Management,” The New York Times (January 26, 2013); Catherine L. Moreton, “10 Qualities That Make Abraham Lincoln a Great Leader,” HR and Employment Law White Papers, Business and Legal Resources (June 25, 2008), https://hr.blr.com/whitepapers/Staf�ing-Training/Leadership/10- Qualities-that-Made-Abraham-Lincoln-a-Great-Lea (https://hr.blr.com/whitepapers/Staf�ing-Training/Leadership/10-Qualities-that-Made-Abraham-Lincoln-a-Great-Lea) (accessed March 4, 2013); Hitendra Wadhwa, “Lessons in Leadership: How Lincoln Became America's Greatest President,” Inc.com (February 12, 2012), http://www.inc.com/hitendra-wadhwa/lessons-in-leadership-how-abraham-lincoln-became-americas-greatest-president.html (http://www.inc.com/hitendra- wadhwa/lessons-in-leadership-how-abraham-lincoln-became-americas-greatest-president.html) (accessed March 4, 2013); and Richard Brookhiser, “What Would Lincoln Do” Modern-Day Leaders Could Learn a Lot from Our 16th President (February 14, 2014), http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303704304579382882084406374?mod=WSJ_hppMIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsSecond (http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303704304579382882084406374?mod=WSJ_hppMIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsSecond) (accessed October 5, 2015). The Howard Schultz quote is from Koehn.
The public trust in leaders may be at an all-time low. Referring to the dire economic situation that followed the ethical and �inancial problems in the mortgage and �inance industries, David Rothkopf wrote in the Washington Post , “This is not just a global economic crisis. It is a global leadership crisis.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/cqth1�htbw3tmygwd076#MAHE8LHB2KV0E56H8664)
David Rothkopf, “Somebody Take Control. (Anybody. Really. Please.): Where Are All the Leaders?” The Washington Post (March 29, 2009), p. B1.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 16/217
1-1. Why We Need Leadership Many of us think of leadership in a way similar to what U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said about obscenity in reviewing a 1964 pornography case: we may not be able to de�ine it but “we know it when we see it.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#UFEL94FC9CDMRSV8Z171) People can clearly see leadership in Abraham Lincoln, but many are having a hard time seeing it in current political, business, military, and even religious leaders. General David Petraeus, one of the most decorated military leaders of his generation, stepped down as director of the Central Intelligence Agency after the FBI inadvertently discovered he had an extramarital affair with his biographer and began investigating for potential leaks of classi�ied information. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) was tarnished by allegations that managers covered up years of sexual abuse by a well-known reporter. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#DEMJ0WVLSQCEX6K3D009) Senator Chuck Grassley recently probed the �inancial records of six well-known televangelists, including Cre�lo Dollar and Kenneth Copeland, after reports that tax-exempt donations were �inancing lavish lifestyles for the religious leaders, including mansions, Rolls Royce cars, and private jets. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#APQDMZQXY5ZP9VD3Q875) Nearly every month brings a new report of a business leader somewhere lying to, misleading, or cheating employees, customers, or the government. No wonder survey after survey shows that con�idence in leaders is sinking and suspicion and distrust are rising. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#BEWYXAXDUFD1SJ7T8777)
Thanks to Doug Moran, “Great Leadership,” Leadership Excellence (September 2011), p. 18, for this analogy.
John F. Burns and Stephen Castle, “BBC's Leaders Faulted as Lax in Handling Sex Abuse Crisis,” The New York Times (December 19, 2012), http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/world/europe/pollard-report-bbc-jimmy-savile-sexual-abuse-inquiry.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/world/europe/pollard-report-bbc-jimmy-savile-sexual-abuse-inquiry.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0) (accessed March 4, 2013).
“Sen. Grassley Probes Televangelists' Finances,” USA TODAY (November 7, 2007), http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-11-07-televangelist- probe_N.htm (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-11-07-televangelist-probe_N.htm) (accessed March 4, 2013).
See various surveys and studies reported in Paul Harris, “Leadership Role Models Earn Trust and Pro�its,” T+D 64, no. 3 (2010), pp. 47–50.
Yet there are good leaders working in every organization, large and small. In fact, quality leadership is all around us every day, in all facets of our lives—our families, schools, communities, social clubs, and volunteer organizations, as well as in the world of business, sports, religion, government, and the military. Without good leadership, our institutions and society would fall apart.
Before we can examine what makes an effective leader, we need to know what leadership means. Scholars and other writers have offered hundreds of de�initions of the term leadership , prompting James McGregor Burns to conclude that leadership “is one of the most observed and least understood phenomena on earth.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#QXJSQ1U3B480JSTEQ096) De�ining leadership has been a complex and elusive problem largely because the nature of leadership itself is complex. Some have even suggested that leadership is nothing more than a romantic myth, perhaps based on the false hope that someone will come along and solve our problems by sheer force of will. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#SUTQMWD7RQN8CDA30018)
Gary Cohen, “De�ining Leadership,” Leadership Excellence (August 2009), pp. 16–17; Warren Bennis and Burt Nanus, Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge (New York: Harper & Row, 1985), p. 4; and James MacGregor Burns, Leadership (New York: Harper & Row, 1978), p. 2.
J. Meindl, S. Ehrlich, and J. Dukerich, “The Romance of Leadership,” Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (1985), pp. 78–102; and Mitchell C. Bligh, Jeffrey C. Kohles, and Rajnandini Pillai, “Romancing Leadership: Past, Present, Future,” The Leadership Quarterly 22 (2011), pp. 1058–1077.
There is some evidence that people do pin their hopes on leaders in ways that are not always realistic. Think about how some struggling companies recruit well-known, charismatic CEOs and invest tremendous hopes in them, only to �ind that their problems actually get worse. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#TXVFUR0PV6R0DKFY9424) For example, Yahoo hired former Autodesk CEO Carol Bartz in 2009 with high hopes that the star leader could turn the struggling company around, only to ask her to leave a couple of years later as Yahoo's fortunes continued to slide. In mid-2012, Yahoo hired former Google executive Marissa Mayer as the �ifth CEO in �ive years.
Rakesh Khurana, “The Curse of the Superstar CEO,” Harvard Business Review (September 2002), pp. 60–66.
Particularly when times are tough, people often look to a grand, charismatic type of leader to alleviate fear and uncertainty. Think of how Barack Obama sailed to the U.S. presidency in 2008 based largely on his charisma and the ability to make people feel hopeful in a time of uncertainty. In recent years, the romantic or heroic view of leadership has been challenged. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#GCBALTSR8C7GPP04N024) Much progress
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 17/217
has been made in understanding the essential nature of leadership as a real and powerful in�luence in organizations and societies.
Khurana, “The Curse of the Superstar CEO”; Mitch McCrimmon, “The Ideal Leader,” Ivey Business Journal (January–February 2011); Joseph A. Raelin, “The Myth of Charismatic Leaders,” Training and Development (March 2003), p. 46; and Betsy Morris, “The New Rules,” Fortune (July 24, 2006), pp. 70–87.
1-1a. De�ining Leadership
Leadership studies are an evolving discipline, and the concept of leadership will continue to develop. For the purpose of this book, we will focus on a single de�inition that delineates the essential elements of the leadership process: Leadership is an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#YVSJP1XLFUDQPHH0B710)
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 18/217
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 19/217
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
Leadership an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 20/217
Joseph C. Rost, Leadership for the Twenty-First Century (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1993), p. 102; and Joseph C. Rost and Richard A. Barker, “Leadership Education in Colleges: Toward a 21st Century Paradigm,” The Journal of Leadership Studies 7, no. 1 (2000), pp. 3–12.
Exhibit 1.1 summarizes the key elements in this de�inition. Leadership involves in�luence; it occurs among people; those people intentionally desire signi�icant changes; and the changes re�lect purposes shared by leaders and followers. In�luence means that the relationship among people is not passive; however, also inherent in this de�inition is the concept that in�luence is multidirectional and noncoercive. The basic cultural values in North America make it easiest to think of leadership as something a leader does to a follower. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#PBBKSM47TJ2090XA8106) However, leadership is reciprocal. In most organizations, superiors in�luence subordinates, but subordinates also in�luence superiors. The people involved in the relationship want substantive changes —leadership involves creating change, not maintaining the status quo. In addition, the changes sought are not dictated by leaders but re�lect purposes that leaders and followers share. Moreover, change is toward an outcome that both the leader and the followers want, a desired future or shared purpose that motivates them toward this more preferable outcome. An important aspect of leadership is in�luencing others to come together around a common vision. Thus, leadership involves the in�luence of people to bring about change toward a desirable future.
Peter B. Smith and Mark F. Peterson, Leadership, Organizations, and Culture: An Event Management Model (London: Sage Publications, 1988), p. 14.
Exhibit 1.1. What Leadership Involves
Also, leadership is a people activity and is distinct from administrative paperwork or planning activities. Leadership occurs among people; it is not something done to people. Since leadership involves people, there must be followers . An individual performer who achieves excellence as a scientist, musician, athlete, or woodcarver may be a leader in her �ield of expertise but is not a leader as de�ined in this book unless followers are involved. Followers are an important part of the leadership process, and all leaders are sometimes followers as well. Good leaders know how to follow, and they set an example for others. The issue of intention or will means that people—leader and followers—are actively involved in the pursuit of change. Each person takes personal responsibility to achieve the desired future.
One stereotype is that leaders are somehow different, that they are above others; however, in reality, the qualities needed for effective leadership are the same as those needed to be an effective follower. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#XETY5395NPJVG00D5835) Effective followers think for themselves and carry out assignments with energy and enthusiasm. They are committed to something outside their own self-interest, and they have the courage to stand up for what they believe. Good followers are not “yes people” who blindly follow a leader. Effective leaders and effective followers may sometimes be the same people, playing different roles at different times. At its best, leadership is shared among leaders and followers, with everyone fully engaged and accepting higher levels of responsibility.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 21/217
Robert E. Kelley, “In Praise of Followers,” Harvard Business Review (November–December 1988), pp. 142–148.
1-1b. Everyday Leadership
Using this de�inition of leadership makes clear that leadership can come from anyone. When we stop equating leadership with greatness and public visibility, it becomes easier to see our own opportunities for leadership and recognize the leadership of people we interact with every day. Leaders come in all shapes and sizes, and many true leaders are working behind the scenes. Leadership that has big outcomes often starts small.
Wendy Kopp was a senior at Princeton University when she �irst came up with the idea of a sort of “Peace Corps for teachers,” a national organization that would recruit recent college graduates to commit to teach for two years at some of America's toughest public schools. One of her Princeton professors admits he called her “deranged” when she proposed the idea to him. Yet Teach for America, the organization Kopp started, became one of the most respected educational initiatives in the United States. As the organization has grown larger, it has come under attack, but most observers agree it has changed education for the better and it continues to harness the idealism of young college graduates as a force for good. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#GABEQZ4P0YB9TJ4LZ184)
Bill George, “Truly Authentic Leadership” (Special Report: America's Best Leaders), U.S. News & World Report (October 30, 2006), pp. 52–53; Victoria Strauss, “It's Time for Teach for America to Fold: Former TFAer,” (The Answer Sheet blog), The Washington Post (February 28, 2013), http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/02/28/its-time-for-teach-for-america-to-fold-former-tfaer/ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/02/28/its-time-for-teach-for-america-to-fold-former-tfaer/) (accessed March 5, 2013); and “Is Teach for America Working?” (Room for Debate Opinion Page), The New York Times (August 30, 2012), http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/08/30/is-teach-for-america-working/ (http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/08/30/is-teach- for-america-working/) (accessed March 5, 2013)
Clinical psychologist Barbara Van Dahlen was working primarily with children in the Washington, D.C., area when she became concerned about the effects of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan on the mental health of U.S. soldiers, veterans, and their families. Van Dahlen founded Give an Hour to provide free services that give help and hope to returning service members. The organization now has a national network of more than 6,100 mental health professionals who volunteer their time. Give an Hour also works with other organizations, such as Bare the Burden, a nonpro�it organization that creates an online community for veterans to heal by connecting with others. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#VAGE2BCASJ964UEA3318)
“Barbara Van Dahlen” segment in “The World's 100 Most In�luential People 2012,” Time http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2111975_2111976,00.html (http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2111975_2111976,00.html) (accessed March 4, 2013); and Barbara Van Dahlen, “Recognizing Options for Healing This Veterans Day,” Huf�ington Post (November 13, 2012), http://www.huf�ingtonpost.com/barbara-van-dahlen-phd/veterans- health-care_b_2092411.html (http://www.huf�ingtonpost.com/barbara-van-dahlen-phd/veterans-health-care_b_2092411.html) (accessed March 4, 2013).
During his �ive years working as a car salesman, Robert Chambers was disgusted by how some dealers and �inance institutions preyed on low-income customers. After he retired from a varied career, the 62-year-old electrical engineer decided to do something about it. He founded More Than Wheels, which helps low-income people buy new, base-model cars at low prices and on good loan terms. With branches in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine, More Than Wheels has negotiated price and extended warranty deals with a dozen or so auto dealers and worked with banks to provide low interest rates. More Than Wheels guarantees the loan and then works with clients to help them manage their �inances, improve their credit scores, and improve their future. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qnlja945l6d1gnyjk720#DXYPAGYU60NFX818E804)
Scott R. Schmedel, “Making a Difference,” The Wall Street Journal (August 21, 2006), pp. R5, R12; and “More Than Wheels: About,” http://www.morethanwheels.org/about (http://www.morethanwheels.org/about) (accessed March 5, 2012).
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can recognize opportunities for leadership and act to in�luence others and bring about changes for a better future.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 22/217
There are opportunities for leadership all around us that involve in�luence and change toward a desired goal or outcome. As further illustrated in the Leader's Bookshelf , widely known and highly respected leaders often begin their leadership journeys in small ways. The leaders of tomorrow's organizations will come from anywhere and everywhere, just as they always have. Do you have the capacity and commitment required for taking a leadership role in your school, community, or workplace? You can start now, wherever you are, to practice leadership in your own life. Leadership is an everyday way of acting and thinking that has little to do with a title or formal position in an organization. As we will discuss in the following section, business leaders need to understand this tenet more than ever in the world of the twenty-�irst century.
Leader's Bookshelf My Life in Leadership: The Journey and Lessons Learned Along the Way by Frances Hesselbein
What college dropout transformed one of the world's largest volunteer organizations, was named Fortune magazine's “Best Nonpro�it Manager in America,” and received America's highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom? The answer: Frances Hesselbein, who began her amazing leadership journey as a somewhat reluctant volunteer leader of Girl Scout Troup 17 in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, when she was in her early twenties. In her autobiography, My Life in Leadership , Hesselbein, now in her late 90s, shares what she has learned about leadership throughout her long career.
“Leadership is a Matter of How to Be, Not How to Do”
Hesselbein argues that “it is the quality and character of the leader that determines performance.” For her, leadership is about serving others. From her beginning as a volunteer Scout leader, she eventually became CEO of the Girl Scouts of the USA, and later was founding president of famed management scholar Peter Drucker's Leader to Leader Institute (she still serves as CEO of the organization, recently renamed the Frances Hesselbein Leadership Institute). Here are a few of the key lessons Hesselbein has learned along the way:
Have a Clear Mission That Everyone Can Support. As soon as she became CEO of the national Girl Scouts, Hesselbein took a close look at the mission of the organization and began asking leaders at all levels, as well as girls themselves, what they really valued, wanted, and needed. “Because we included everyone, it became theirs, not ours,” she says. Hesselbein calls the mission, vision, and values “the soul of the organization,” which should be central “even as we abandon the vestiges of the past that spell irrelevance in the future.”
Be Inclusive. Hesselbein also ditched the hierarchy, sharing information and power with leaders at all levels from the beginning. A concept she called “circular management,” put the leader in the middle of the organizational chart rather than at the top of a hierarchy. Everyone was a member of a team, and there were no superiors and subordinates. Being inclusive develops leaders at every level and increases the energy and creativity of the entire organization.
Make Learning a Top Priority. Organizations have to keep changing and adapting when it's necessary. “The �irst item in your budget should be learning, education, and development of your people,” she says.
The Great Adventure
Hesselbein tells her story in Learning to Lead as a great adventure that she enjoyed every step of the way. It is a story told in a very personal way, but one that is packed with observations and re�lections that are as relevant to today's leaders as when Hesselbein �irst began her long leadership journey as a volunteer Girl Scout leader.
Source: Learning to Lead , by Frances Hesselbein, is published by Jossey-Bass.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 23/217
1-2. The New Reality for Leaders Social media. Globalization. Mobile commerce. Geopolitical wars. Renewable technologies and smart machines. Outsourcing. Climate change and resource scarcity. Telecommuting and virtual teams. Cybercrime. Redistribution of economic power. Massive changes in the world mean today's leaders are facing challenges they couldn't even imagine just a few years ago. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#FANX8S2Z3XPS5LRYP001) In a survey by the Center for Creative Leadership, 84 percent of leaders surveyed say the de�inition of effective leadership changed signi�icantly within the �irst few years of the twenty-�irst century. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#NYUEKFKX37YBTMVJW048) And that was even before social and mobile technologies began reshaping everyday life and work. Social connectedness and mobility are becoming central aspects of every leader's job.
These changes and challenges are based in part on Thomas W. Malnight and Tracey S. Keys, “The Great Power Shift: 10 Trends Business Leaders Need to Watch in 2013,” as reported in “The World in 2013: Global Trends for 2013; A Top Ten for Business Leaders,” Cassandra blog, The Economist (November 26, 2012), http://www.economist.com/blogs/theworldin2013/2012/11/global-trends-2013 (http://www.economist.com/blogs/theworldin2013/2012/11/global-trends-2013) (accessed March 5, 2013). The complete Global Trends 2013 report is available for purchase at http://www.globaltrends.com/reports/gt-2013 (http://www.globaltrends.com/reports/gt-2013)
Center for Creative Leadership survey reported in Andre Martin, “What Is Effective Leadership Today? A New Study Finds Collaboration Prized over Heroics,” Chief Executive (July–August 2006), p. 24.
Some historians and other scholars believe our world is undergoing a transformation more profound and far-reaching than any experienced since the dawn of the modern age and the Industrial Revolution more than 500 years ago. Today's leaders operate in a world where little is certain, the pace is relentless, and everything is more complex. This transformation requires a transition from a traditional to a new leadership paradigm, as outlined in Exhibit 1.2 . * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#MBDXNC0K00CPJZAP3638) A paradigm is a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world.
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 24/217
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 25/217
This discussion is based on Dominic Barton, Andrew Grant, and Michelle Horn, “Leading in the 21st Century,” McKinsey Quarterly , no. 3 (2012), pp. 30–47; Olivia Parr Rud, “Book Highlight—Adaptability: A Key to Business Intelligence Success,” Global Business and Organizational Excellence (January–February 2010), pp. 76–85; Ken Shelton, “Reinventing Leadership,” Leadership Excellence (July 2012), p. 9; Fahri Karakas, “The Twenty-First Century Leader: Social Artist, Spiritual Visionary, and Cultural Innovator,” Global Business and Organizational Excellence (March/April 2007), pp. 44–50; Daniel C. Kielson, “Leadership: Creating a New Reality,” The Journal of Leadership Studies 3, no. 4 (1996), pp. 104–116; and Mark A. Abramson, “Leadership for the Future: New Behaviors, New Roles, and New Attitudes,” The Public Manager (Spring 1997).
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
paradigm a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 26/217
Exhibit 1.2. The New Reality for Leaders
Although many leaders are still operating from an old-paradigm mindset, as outlined in the �irst column of Exhibit 1.2 , they are increasingly ineffective. Successful leaders will respond to the new reality outlined in the second column of the exhibit.
1-2a. From Stabilizer to Change Manager
In the past, many leaders assumed that if they could just keep things running on a steady, even keel, the organization would be successful. Yet today's world is in constant motion, and nothing seems certain anymore. If leaders still had an illusion of stability at the dawn of the twenty-�irst century, it is surely shattered by now. Consider the following recent events:
A powerful earthquake in Japan triggered massive tsunami waves that damaged the nuclear reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant and led to the shutdown of numerous companies, creating supply chain disruptions for manufacturers around the world. In the wake of the disaster, managers at Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) were criticized for failing to act quickly enough to cool the reactors at Fukushima. Trying to protect their investment, they hesitated to use seawater, which they knew could damage the reactors, leading to the second- largest nuclear disaster in history. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#VUFV79UYB4N5KU53D816)
Norihiko Shirouzu, Phred Dvorak, Yuka Hayashi, and Andrew Morse, “Bid to ‘Protect Assets’ Slowed Reactor Fight,” The Wall Street Journal (March 19, 2011), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704608504576207912642629904.html (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704608504576207912642629904.html) (accessed August 6, 20120); and Peter Valdes-Dapena, “Japan Earthquake Impact Hits U.S. Auto Plants,” CNNMoney (March 30, 2011), http://money.cnn.com/2011/03/28/autos/japan_earthquake_autos_outlook/index.htm# (http://money.cnn.com/2011/03/28/autos/japan_earthquake_autos_outlook/index.htm#) (accessed June 13, 2012).
In 2015, the Volkswagen Group, one of the largest car manufacturers in the world and known as maker of “the people's car,” was discovered to have used software designed to cheat U.S. emissions tests, affecting 11 million vehicles worldwide. Actual exhaust emissions turned out to be up to 40 times higher than the emission tests revealed. VW's emissions scandal cast doubt on the reputations and emissions validity of other auto manufacturers such as Mercedes and BMW. Germany's national economy and auto suppliers worldwide will likely be hurt as VW sales decline. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#GAPD7HWRRTJUAVD33104)
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 27/217
William Boston and Sarah Sloat, “Volkswagen Emissions Scandal Relates to 11 Million Cars,” The Wall Street Journal (September 22, 2015), http://www.wsj.com/articles/volkswagen-emissions-scandal-relates-to-11-million-cars-1442916906 (http://www.wsj.com/articles/volkswagen- emissions-scandal-relates-to-11-million-cars-1442916906) (accessed October 5, 2015), and Jack Ewing, “Diesel Scandal at VW Spreads to Core Market,” The New York Times (September 23, 2015), p. A1.
Greece was in a deep recession in 2015 due to huge debts to the European Union (EU). Sharp cutbacks in government spending had decimated personal incomes and businesses in the region. Ireland and Spain faced similar debt problems previously, causing talk of a possible breakup of the euro system (the single currency adopted by EU countries), which would deal a severe blow to the global �inancial system. Leaders of multinational �irms have to take steps to protect themselves, as well as consider what they will do in the event that a return to national currencies requires a rethinking of everything from how to expand operations to how to pick suppliers or pay employees. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#NLSQBLWUGFVRMDG04763)
Vanessa Fuhrmans, and Dana Cimilluca, “Business Braces for Europe's Worst—Multinationals Scramble to Protect Cash, Revise Contracts, Tighten Payment Terms,” The Wall Street Journal (June 1, 2012), p. B1.
Most leaders, whether in business, politics, the military, education, social services, the arts, or the world of sports, recognize that trying to maintain stability in a world of such unexpected and far-reaching change is a losing battle. “You have to be able to react very quickly,” said Ellen Kullman, recently retired CEO of DuPont, referring to the impact of events such as the Japanese tsunami and the EU �inancial crisis. “And the world is so connected that the feedback loops are more intense.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#HHZH69L0GC8PSD57P187)
Quoted in Barton et al., “Leading in the 21st Century.”
Today's best leaders accept the inevitability of change and crisis and tap into them as potential sources of energy and self- renewal. Adaptability is the watchword of the day.
1-2b. From Controller to Facilitator
Leaders in powerful positions once believed strict control was needed for the organization to function ef�iciently and effectively. Rigid organizational hierarchies, structured jobs and work processes, and detailed, inviolate procedures let everyone know that those at the top had power and those at the bottom had none.
Today, the old assumptions about the distribution of power are no longer valid. An emphasis on control and rigidity serves to squelch motivation, innovation, and morale rather than produce desired results. Effective leaders share power rather than hoard it and �ind ways to increase an organization's brainpower by getting everyone in the organization involved and committed. Rather than being a controller, the leader is a facilitator who helps people do and be their best by removing obstacles to performance, getting people what they need, providing learning opportunities, and offering support and feedback.
One reason for this is that the �inancial basis of today's economy is becoming information rather than the tangible assets of land, buildings, and machines. This means human capital is becoming more important than �inancial capital, which increases the power of employees. “Ideas are now more important than materials,” as former Israeli president Shimon Peres once put it. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#WUYJ5WHPD71U7TTK9249) When all the organization needed was workers to run machines eight hours a day, traditional command-and-control systems generally worked quite well, but success today depends on the intellectual capacity of all employees. One of the leader's most challenging jobs is to enable people to embrace and use their power effectively. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#QEJN9KA0J6C36V1CB965)
Quoted in Barton et al., “Leading in the 21st Century.”
Charles Handy, The Age of Paradox (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994), pp. 146–147; and Geoff Colvin, “Leader Machines,” Fortune (October 1, 2007), pp. 98– 106.
When he took over as CEO of India's struggling HCL Technologies in 2005, Vineet Nayar took a huge risk that proved to be a highly effective route to true employee empowerment and increasing revenues. His revolutionary move was to organize the company around the principle of “employees �irst, customers second.” Nayar created an open online forum where people could post questions and leaders would answer. Employees were overjoyed that leaders were willing to acknowledge the problems in the company, and they began proposing solutions. This began the transfer of power and responsibility for solving problems from top executives to employees. In the new HCL, the job of leaders is to serve employees. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#ENJVX3DDF8Z1MUTUD298) Nayar, who served as CEO until 2013, wrote a book titled Employees First, Customers Second: Turning Conventional Management Upside
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 28/217
Down to explain how leaders can tap into the power of this unconventional approach. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#DUPV1SW0X9D05X6QN614)
J. P. Donlon, “What, Put Your Customers Second? Are You Kidding?” (CEO Chronicles), Chief Executive (November–December 2010), pp. 14–16; “HCL Technologies CEO, Vineet Nayar, Gets ‘Leader in the Digital Age’ Award at CeBIT 2011,” Entertainment Close-Up (March 11, 2011); and Stephen Denning, “Masterclass: The Reinvention of Management,” Strategy & Leadership 39, no. 2 (2011), pp. 9–17.
Vineet Nayar, Employees First, Customers Second: Turning Conventional Management Upside Down (Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2010).
1-2c. From Competitor to Collaborator
Social media has “put connectivity on steroids,” blurring and sometimes obliterating boundaries within and between organizations. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#YXLZW6APWMJXUK8A6356) In a hyperconnected, networked age, collaboration becomes more important than competition. Successful leaders harness and make the most of ideas, talent, and resources from across boundaries of all kinds. Although some companies still encourage internal competition and aggressiveness, most successful leaders stress teamwork, compromise, and cooperation. Self-directed teams and other forms of horizontal collaboration spread knowledge and information throughout the organization.
Herminia Ibarra and Morten T. Hansen, “Are You a Collaborative Leader?” Harvard Business Review (July–August 2011), pp. 69–74.
New Leader Action Memo
Go to Leader's Self-Insight 1.1 to learn about your own “intelligence” for dealing with collaboration and with the other new realities facing leaders.
Effective leaders also work collaboratively with suppliers, customers, governments, universities, and other organizations. There is a growing trend within companies to think of themselves as teams that create value jointly rather than as autonomous entities in competition with all others.
Collaboration presents greater leadership challenges than did the old concept of competition. Leaders �irst have to develop their own collaborative mindset and then create an environment of teamwork and community that fosters collaboration and mutual support. They learn to keep the lines of communication open and use in�luence rather than wielding their authority to quell harmful politicking, get buy-in on important matters, and move things forward. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#CTAWYJ55F4NYBWM6C523)
Ibarra and Hansen, “Are You a Collaborative Leader?”; and Sally Helgesen, “Leading in 24/7: What Is Required?” Leader to Leader (Summer 2012), pp. 38–43.
Leader's Self-Insight 1.1. Your Learning Style: Using Multiple Intelligences
Instructions: Multiple-intelligence theory suggests that there are several different ways of learning about things in a topsy-turvy world; hence there are multiple “intelligences,” of which �ive are interpersonal (learn via interactions with others), intrapersonal (own inner states), logical–mathematical (rationality and logic), verbal–linguistic (words and language), and musical (sounds, tonal patterns, and rhythms). Most people prefer one or two of the intelligences as a way of learning, yet each person has the potential to develop skills in each of the intelligences.
The following items will help you identify the forms of intelligence that you tend to use or enjoy most, as well as the forms that you use less. Please check each item below as Mostly False or Mostly True for you.
Mostly False Mostly True 1. I like to work with and solve complex problems. 2. I recently wrote something that I am especially proud of. 3. I have three or more friends. 4. I like to learn about myself through personality tests.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 29/217
Mostly False Mostly True 5. I frequently listen to music on the radio or iPod-type player. 6. Math and science were among my favorite subjects. 7. Language and social studies were among my favorite subjects. 8. I am frequently involved in social activities. 9. I have or would like to attend personal growth seminars. 10. I notice if a melody is out of tune or off key. 11. I am good at problem solving that requires logical thinking. 12. My conversations frequently include things I've read or heard about. 13. When among strangers, I easily �ind someone to talk to. 14. I spend time alone meditating, re�lecting, or thinking. 15. After hearing a tune once or twice, I am able to sing it back with some accuracy.
Scoring and Interpretation
Count the number of items checked Mostly True that represent each of the �ive intelligences as indicated below.
Questions 1, 6, 11: Logical–mathematical intelligence.
# Mostly True = ________.
Questions 2, 7, 12: Verbal–linguistic intelligence.
# Mostly True = ________.
Questions 3, 8, 13: Interpersonal intelligence.
# Mostly True = ________.
Questions 4, 9, 14: Intrapersonal intelligence.
# Mostly True = ________.
Questions 5, 10, 15: Musical intelligence.
# Mostly True = ________.
Educational institutions tend to stress the logical–mathematical and verbal–linguistic forms of learning. How do your intelligences align with the changes taking place in the world? Would you rather rely on using one intelligence in depth or develop multiple intelligences? Any intelligence above for which you received a score of 3 is a major source of learning for you, and a score of zero means you may not use it at all. How do your intelligences �it your career plans and your aspirations for the type of leader you want to be?
Sources: Based on Kirsi Tirri, Petri Nokelainen, and Martin Ubani, “Conceptual De�inition and Empirical Validation of the Spiritual Sensitivity Scale,” Journal of Empirical Theology 19 (2006), pp. 37–62; and David Lazear, “Seven Ways of Knowing: Teaching for Multiple Intelligences,” (Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight Publishing, 1991).
1-2d. From Diversity Avoider to Diversity Promoter
Many of today's organizations were built on assumptions of uniformity, separation, and specialization. People who think alike, act alike, and have similar job skills are grouped into a department, such as accounting or manufacturing, separate from other departments. Homogenous groups �ind it easy to get along, communicate, and understand one another. The uniform thinking that arises, however, can be a disaster in a world becoming more multinational and diverse.
Bringing diversity into the organization is the way to attract the best human talent and develop an organizational mindset broad enough to thrive in a multinational world. Carlos Ghosn, CEO of Nissan, says one reason his company has been able to
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 30/217
cope with change and crises better than some of its competitors is its highly diverse culture and workforce. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#XSFQ0A52JHNYP57M0136) Two business school graduates in their twenties discovered the importance of diversity when they started a specialized advertising �irm. They worked hard, and as the �irm grew, they hired more people just like themselves—bright, young, intense college graduates who were committed and hard working. The �irm grew to about 20 employees over two and a half years, but the expected pro�its never materialized. The two entrepreneurs could never get a handle on what was wrong, and the �irm slid into bankruptcy. Convinced the idea was still valid, they started over, but with a new philosophy. They sought employees with different ages, values, ethnic backgrounds, and work experience. People had different styles, yet the organization seemed to work better. People played different roles, and the diverse experiences of the group enabled the �irm to respond to unique situations and handle a variety of organizational and personal needs. The advertising �irm is growing again, and this time it is also making a pro�it.
Barton et al., “Leading in the 21st Century.”
Consider This! Should Leaders Live by the Cowboy Code? 1. A cowboy never takes unfair advantage—even of an enemy.
2. A cowboy never goes back on his word or betrays a trust.
3. A cowboy always tells the truth.
4. A cowboy is kind and gentle with children, the elderly, and animals.
5. A cowboy is free from racial or religious prejudice.
6. A cowboy is always helpful and lends a hand when anyone is in trouble.
7. A cowboy is a good worker.
8. A cowboy stays clean in thought, speech, action, and personal habits.
9. A cowboy respects womanhood, parents, and the laws of his nation.
10. A cowboy is a patriot to his country.
Source: Gene Autry's Cowboy Commandments are reported, with some variations in wording, in multiple sources.
1-2e. From Hero to Humble
Another shift is the move from celebrating the “leader-as-hero” to recognizing the hard-working behind-the-scenes leader who quietly builds a strong, enduring company by supporting and developing others rather than touting his or her own abilities and successes. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#TSCSBHZ4STU0745X6723) Recall from this chapter's opening example how Abraham Lincoln made an intentional choice early in his political career to use his abilities to serve the interests of the American people rather than to feed his own ego. This chapter's Consider This box presents 10 commandments based on 1950s western �ilm star Gene Autry's Cowboy Code that can be regarded as applicable to new-paradigm leaders even today.
See James Collins, Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap … and Others Don't (New York: HarperCollins, 2001); Charles A. O'Reilly III and Jeffrey Pfeffer, Hidden Value: How Great Companies Achieve Extraordinary Results with Ordinary People (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000); Rakesh Khurana, Searching for a Corporate Savior: The Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002); Joseph Badaracco, Leading Quietly (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2002); Jason Jennings, Think Big, Act Small: How America's Best Performing Companies Keep the Startup Spirit Alive (New York: Portfolio/Penguin, 2005); Ryan Underwood, “The CEO Next Door,” Fast Company (September 2005), pp. 64–66; and Linda Tischler, “The CEO's New Clothes,” Fast Company (September 2005), pp. 27–28.
“Humility is not weakness. Humility has its effect across levels of an organization in an empowered uplifting way. You can't browbeat people into performance.”
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 31/217
Angelo Kinicki, Management Professor, Author, and Consultant
One reason for the shift from hero to humble is that it is less and less realistic for an individual leader to meet all the challenges a team or organization faces in a complex and rapidly changing world. Another is that ambitious, highly self-con�ident, charismatic leaders have been at the forefront of some of the ethical scandals and business failures of recent years. The hero leader may make more risky and daring decisions, often without considering the greater good, whereas a humble leader will seek advice and take time to think through the possible consequences of his or her actions. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#HXVEGUW9P0SCMXAN1358) A recent study from the W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University found that the most effective CEOs, for example, were those who led with humility by empowering and appreciating their employees, being open to feedback, and putting the greater good above their own self-interest. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#NGLR96TN5V1S90DUU925)
David Brooks, “The Humble Hound,” The New York Times (April 10, 2010), p. A27; Charalambos A. Vlachoutsicos, “How to Cultivate Engaged Employees,” Harvard Business Review (September 2011), pp. 123–126; and Rob Nielsen, Jennifer A. Marrone, and Holly S. Slay, “A New Look at Humility: Exploring the Humility Concept and Its Role in Socialized Charismatic Leadership,” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Science 17, no. 1 (2010), pp. 33–43.
Amy Y. Ou, Anne S. Tsui, Angelo J. Kinicki, David A. Waldman, Zhixing Xiao, and Lynda Jiwen Song, “Humble Chief Executive Of�icers' Connections to Top Management Team Integration and Middle Managers' Responses,” Administrative Science Quarterly 59, no. 1 (March 2014): 34–72; and Laurie Merrill, “Study Finds Humble Bosses Are Best,” USA Today (July 30, 2014), http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/07/30/asu-study-humble-bosses-best/13352105/ (http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/07/30/asu-study-humble-bosses-best/13352105/) (accessed October 5, 2015).
Jim Collins, author of Good to Great and Great by Choice , calls this new breed “Level 5 leaders.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#FTCU0Q0DQJLH8PLDR456) In contrast to the view of great leaders as larger-than-life personalities with strong egos and big ambitions, Level 5 leaders often seem shy and unpretentious and have no need to be in the limelight. They are more concerned with the success of the team or company than with their own success.
Jim Collins, “Level 5 Leadership: The Triumph of Humility and Fierce Resolve,” Harvard Business Review (January 2001), pp. 67–76; Collins, “Good to Great,” Fast Company (October 2001), pp. 90–104; Edward Prewitt, “The Utility of Humility,” CIO (December 1, 2002), pp. 104–110; A. J. Vogl, “Onward and Upward” (an interview with Jim Collins), Across the Board (September–October 2001), pp. 29–34; and Stefan Stern, “A New Leadership Blueprint,” Management Today (October 1, 2010), http://www.managementtoday.co.uk/features/1032244/a-new-blueprint-leaders/ (http://www.managementtoday.co.uk/features/1032244/a-new-blueprint-leaders/) (accessed March 13, 2013).
These leaders are characterized by an almost complete lack of ego, coupled with a �ierce resolve to do what is best for the organization. They accept full responsibility for mistakes, poor results, or failures, but they typically give credit for successes to other people. One corporate example is Sir Terry Leahy, who recently retired after more than a decade leading Britain's Tesco. That is a long and successful tenure for a leader whom most people know little about. Leahy didn't court personal publicity, much to the chagrin of journalists, and he put his energies into promoting Tesco and its employees rather than himself. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#RBHK55N4EK7S5UZAD032) Although most research regarding the new type of leader has been on corporate CEOs like Sir Terry Leahy, it is important to remember that new-paradigm or Level 5 leaders are in all positions in all types of organizations. Perhaps not surprisingly, Pope Francis is an excellent example of a humble leader. He chose to be named after St. Francis of Assisi to illustrate that humility and service come �irst. But the popular pope also illustrates many other qualities of the new-paradigm leader.
As described in Stefan Stern, “A New Leadership Blueprint,” Management Today (October 1, 2010), p. 38.
In the Lead Pope Francis, Roman Catholic Church
He was chosen as Time magazine's 2013 “Person of the Year,” is a leader in Google searches, has tripled attendance at papal events with his humility, empathy, and commitment to the disenfranchised, and created a huge stir when he visited the United States for the �irst time in September 2015. The leader considered “everyone's pope” has become a celebrity among managers, leadership coaches, entrepreneurs, and CEOs, too.
In a short period of time, Francis has brought about tremendous change and revival in a huge, global organization that has suffered devastating scandals in recent years and, not so long ago, seemed on the verge of becoming irrelevant. He did it by using not only his personal charisma and character but also leadership skills that anyone can apply. For example, Francis doesn't fear change and is willing to take risks. He has reached out to atheists and agnostics, proclaimed a year of jubilee for women who have had abortions but have since chosen to re�lect on the Church's teachings on the subject, and declared that God has redeemed all of us, not just Catholics. Francis has also demonstrated the importance of empowering rather than controlling subordinates. He transformed the Synod of Bishops into a
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 32/217
decision-making group rather than a ceremonial one. He created a global Council of Cardinal Advisers made up of members who re�lect diverse views. He is always willing to listen to advice from anyone and uses social media. He has washed the feet of prisoners, women, and Muslims, rather than performing the traditional ritual only on priests, as a way to show the value of every person and what each person can contribute. He makes personal telephone calls to unsuspecting people, such as the 14-year-old brother of a gas station attendant killed in an armed robbery and a Vatican critic who was ill in the hospital.
Francis is willing to listen, to collaborate, and to take advice, but he also isn't afraid to move forward with his own ideas when he believes this serves the greater good and is in the best interest of the organization. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/wqwf9483nd4zap7nq399#NFKBBVNKVA3CHYNKM977)
Noah Rayman, “5 Leadership Lessons You Can Learn from Pope Francis,” Time (March 10, 2015), http://time.com/3737887/pope-francis-leadership- lessons/ (http://time.com/3737887/pope-francis-leadership-lessons/) (accessed October 6, 2015); William Vanderbloemen, “5 Leadership Lessons from Pope Francis,” Fast Company (September 25, 2015), http://www.fastcompany.com/3051514/know-it-all/5-lessons-every-leader-can-learn-from-pope-francis (http://www.fastcompany.com/3051514/know-it-all/5-lessons-every-leader-can-learn-from-pope-francis) (accessed October 6, 2015); Minda Zetlin, “Why Pope Francis Is So Effective: 8 Lessons for Every Leader,” Inc . (August 1, 2014), http://www.inc.com/minda-zetlin/why-pope-francis-is-so-effective-8-lessons-for- every-leader.html (http://www.inc.com/minda-zetlin/why-pope-francis-is-so-effective-8-lessons-for-every-leader.html) (accessed October 6, 2015); Ben Brum�ield, “Pope Francis Surprised by Warmth of Americans and Devoutness of the Faithful,” CNN (September 28, 2015), http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/28/us/pope- trip-wrap-vatican/ (http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/28/us/pope-trip-wrap-vatican/) (accessed October 6, 2015); and Susan Cramm, “Leadership Gone Viral,” Strategy + Business (January 17, 2014), http://www.strategy-business.com/blog/Leadership-Gone-Viral?gko=96623 (http://www.strategy- business.com/blog/Leadership-Gone-Viral?gko=96623) (accessed October 6, 2015).
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can respond to the reality of change and crisis, the need for empowerment, collaboration, and diversity, and the importance of a higher purpose. You can channel your ambition toward achieving larger organizational goals rather than feeding your own ego.
Once a relatively obscure Jesuit cardinal, Pope Francis has become one of the most recognized—and some believe most effective—leaders in the world. Within two years, he has brought signi�icant positive changes, including economic reforms at the Vatican and evolving discussions about social issues. He shows that, rather than playing it safe or being blinded by fear of failure, leaders can bring fresh perspectives to problems and apply their skills to achieve a higher purpose.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 33/217
1-3. How Leadership Differs from Management
New Leader Action Memo
You can evaluate your own leadership potential by completing the quiz in Leader's Self-Insight 1.2 .
Management can be de�ined as the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources. So, what is it that distinguishes the process of leadership from that of management? Managers and leaders are not inherently different types of people. There are managers at all hierarchical levels who are also good leaders, and many people can develop the qualities needed for effective leadership and management. Both are essential in organizations and must be integrated effectively to lead to high performance. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/muwled7hkvq16wg80991#EQNP62D7AZNAU5C4N740) That is, leadership cannot replace management; the two have to go hand-in-hand.
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 34/217
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 35/217
Gary Yukl and Richard Lepsinger, “Why Integrating the Leading and Managing Roles Is Essential for Organizational Effectiveness,” Organizational Dynamics 34, no. 4 (2005), pp. 361–375; Henry Mintzberg, Managing (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2009); Andrew Saunders, “Rebuilding Management's Good Name,” Management Today (May 2011), pp. 44–46; John Kotter, “Change Leadership: How Can You Accelerate Results?” Leadership Excellence (January 2013), pp. 6–7; and Alan Murray, “What Is the Difference Between Management and Leadership?” The Wall Street Journal (2009), http://guides.wsj.com/management/developing-a-leadership-style/what-is-the- difference-between-management-and-leadership/ (http://guides.wsj.com/management/developing-a-leadership-style/what-is-the-difference-between-management-and- leadership/) (accessed June 28, 2009).
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
Management the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and ef�icient manner through planning, organizing, staf�ing, directing, and controlling organizational resources
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 36/217
Leader's Self-Insight 1.2. Your Leadership Potential
Instructions: Questions 1–6 below are about you right now. Questions 7–14 are about how you would like to be if you were the head of a major department at a corporation. Answer Mostly False or Mostly True to indicate whether the item describes you accurately or whether you would strive to perform each activity as a department head.
Now Mostly False Mostly True 1. When I have a number of tasks or homework assignments to do, I set priorities
and organize the work to meet the deadlines.
2. When I am involved in a serious disagreement, I hang in there and talk it out until it is completely resolved.
3. I would rather sit in front of my computer than spend a lot of time with people. 4. I reach out to include other people in activities or when there are discussions. 5. I know my long-term vision for career, family, and other activities. 6. When solving problems, I prefer analyzing things myself to working through
them with a group of people.
Head of Major Department Mostly False Mostly True 7. I would help subordinates clarify goals and how to reach them. 8. I would give people a sense of long-term mission and higher purpose. 9. I would make sure jobs get out on time. 10. I would scout for new product or service opportunities. 11. I would give credit to people who do their jobs well. 12. I would promote unconventional beliefs and values. 13. I would establish procedures to help the department operate smoothly. 14. I would verbalize the higher values that I and the organization stand for.
Scoring and Interpretation
Count the number of Mostly True answers to even-numbered questions: . Count the number of Mostly True answers to odd-numbered questions: . Compare the two scores.
The even-numbered items represent behaviors and activities typical of leadership. Leaders are personally involved in shaping ideas, values, vision, and change. They often use an intuitive approach to develop fresh ideas and seek new directions for the department or organization. The odd-numbered items are considered more traditional management activities. Managers respond to organizational problems in an impersonal way, make rational decisions, and work for stability and ef�iciency.
If you answered yes to more even-numbered than odd-numbered items, you may have potential leadership qualities. If you answered yes to more odd-numbered items, you may have management qualities. Management qualities are an important foundation for new leaders because the organization �irst has to operate ef�iciently. Then leadership qualities can enhance performance. Both sets of qualities can be developed or improved with awareness and experience.
Sources: Based on John P. Kotter, Leading Change (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996), p. 26; Joseph C. Rost, Leadership for the Twenty-�irst Century (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1993), p. 149; and Brian Dumaine, “The New Non-Manager Managers,” Fortune (February 22, 1993), pp. 80–84.
Exhibit 1.3 compares management to leadership in �ive areas crucial to organizational performance—providing direction, aligning followers, building relationships, developing personal qualities, and creating leader outcomes. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/muwled7hkvq16wg80991#QAFCUF77QZCRC6VQ0928)
This section is based on John P. Kotter, A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management (New York: The Free Press, 1990), pp. 3–18; John P. Kotter, “What Leaders Really Do,” Harvard Business Review (December 2001), pp. 85–96; and ideas in Kevin Cashman, “Lead with Energy: Apply the Resilience Principle,” Leadership Excellence (December 2010), p. 7; Henry Mintzberg, Managing (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2009); and Mike Maddock, “The One Talent That Makes Good Leaders Great,” Forbes (September 26, 2012), http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikemaddock/2012/09/26/the-one-talent-that-makes-good-leaders-great/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikemaddock/2012/09/26/the-one-talent-that-makes-good-leaders-great/) (accessed March 7, 2013).
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 37/217
Exhibit 1.3. Comparing Management and Leadership
Sources: Based on John P. Kotter, A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management (New York: The Free Press, 1990) and ideas in Kevin Cashman, “Lead with Energy,” Leadership Excellence (December 2010), p. 7; Henry Mintzberg, Managing (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2009); and Mike Maddock, “The One Talent That Makes Good Leaders Great,” Forbes (September 26, 2012), www.forbes.com/sites/mikemaddock/2012/09/26/the-one-talent-that-makes- good-leaders-great/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikemaddock/2012/09/26/the-one- talent-that-makes-good-leaders-great/) (accessed March 7, 2013).
1-3a. Providing Direction
Both leadership and management are concerned with providing direction for the organization, but there are differences. Management focuses on establishing detailed plans and schedules for achieving speci�ic results, then allocating resources to accomplish the plan. Leadership calls for creating a compelling vision of the future, setting the context within which to view challenges and opportunities, and developing farsighted strategies for producing the changes needed to achieve the vision. Whereas management calls for keeping an eye on the bottom line and short-term results, leadership means keeping an eye on the horizon and the long-term future.
A vision is a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team. It can be as lofty as Motorola's aim to “become the premier company in the world” or as down-to-earth as the Swedish company IKEA's simple vision “to provide affordable furniture for people with limited budgets.”
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 38/217
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 39/217
1-3b. Aligning Followers
Management entails organizing a structure to accomplish the plan; staf�ing the structure with employees; and developing policies, procedures, and systems to direct employees and monitor implementation of the plan. Leadership is concerned instead with communicating the vision and developing a shared culture and set of core values that can lead to the desired future state. Whereas the vision describes the destination, the culture and values help de�ine the journey toward it so that everyone is lined up in the same direction.
Leadership provides learning opportunities so people can expand their minds and abilities and assume responsibility for their own actions. Think about classes you have taken at your college or university. In some classes, the professor tells students
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
vision a picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 40/217
exactly what to do and how to do it, and many students expect this kind of direction and control. Have you ever had a class where the instructor instead inspired and encouraged you and your classmates to �ind innovative ways to meet goals? The difference re�lects a rational management versus a leadership approach.
1-3c. Building Relationships
In terms of relationships, management focuses on getting the most results out of people so that production goals are achieved and goods and services are provided to customers in a timely manner. Leadership, on the other hand, focuses on investing more in people so they are energized and inspired to accomplish goals.
Whereas the management relationship is based on position and formal authority, leadership is a relationship based on personal in�luence and trust. For example, in an authority relationship, both people accept that a manager can tell a subordinate to be at work at 7:30 �.�. or her pay will be docked. Leadership, on the other hand, relies on in�luence, which is less likely to use coercion. The role of leadership is to attract and energize people, motivating them through purpose and challenge rather than rewards or punishments. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/muwled7hkvq16wg80991#XPURD2EJKF6K5X0CW632) The differing source of power is one of the key distinctions between management and leadership. Take away a manager's formal position, and will people choose to follow her? That is the mark of a leader.
Warren Bennis, Why Leaders Can't Lead (San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1989).
1-3d. Developing Personal Leadership Qualities
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can awaken your leadership qualities of enthusiasm, integrity, courage, and moral commitment. You can make emotional connections with followers to increase your leadership effectiveness.
Leadership is more than a set of skills; it relies on a number of subtle personal qualities that are hard to see but are very powerful. These include things like enthusiasm, integrity, courage, and humility. First of all, good leadership springs from a genuine caring for the work and a genuine concern for other people. The process of management generally encourages emotional distance, but leadership means being emotionally connected to others. Where there is leadership, people become part of a community and feel that they are contributing to something worthwhile. Whereas management means providing answers and solving problems, leadership requires the courage to admit mistakes and doubts, to listen, and to trust and learn from others.
Developing leadership qualities takes work. For leadership to happen, leaders may have to undergo a journey of self-discovery and personal understanding. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/muwled7hkvq16wg80991#GGWAS4K0H9TLRLPUR678) Leadership experts agree that a top characteristic of effective leaders is that they know who they are and what they stand for. In addition, leaders have the courage to act on their beliefs.
Abraham Zaleznik, “Managers and Leaders: Are They Different?” Harvard Business Review (March–April 1992), pp. 126–135; David Rooke and William R. Torbert, “7 Transformations of Leadership,” Harvard Business Review (April 2005), pp. 67–76; and Rooke and Torbert, Action Inquiry: The Secret of Timely and Transforming Leadership (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2004).
True leaders tend to have open minds that welcome new ideas rather than closed minds that criticize new ideas. Leaders listen and discern what people want and need more than they talk to give advice and orders. Leaders are willing to be nonconformists, to disagree and say no when it serves the larger good, and to accept nonconformity from others rather than try to squeeze everyone into the same mindset.
1-3e. Creating Outcomes
The differences between management and leadership create two differing outcomes, as illustrated at the bottom of Exhibit 1.3 . Management maintains a degree of stability, predictability, and order through a culture of ef�iciency . Leadership, on the other
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 41/217
hand, creates change, often radical change, within a culture of agility and integrity that helps the organization thrive over the long haul by promoting openness and honesty, positive relationships, and long-term innovation. Leadership facilitates the courage needed to make dif�icult and unconventional decisions that may sometimes hurt short-term results.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 42/217
1-4. Evolving Theories of Leadership To understand leadership as it is viewed and practiced today, it is important to recognize that the concept of leadership has changed over time. Leadership typically re�lects the larger society, and theories have evolved as norms, attitudes, and understandings in the larger world have changed. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tktmu663mpbjz3v35982#TCEXWEA6SXE8QUNDC770)
Jim Boneau and Gregg Thompson, “Leadership 4.0: It's a Brave New Approach,” Leadership Excellence (January 2013), p. 6.
1-4a. Historical Overview of Major Approaches
The various leadership theories can be categorized into six basic approaches, each of which is brie�ly described in this section. Many of these ideas are still applicable to leadership studies today and are discussed in various chapters of this text.
Great Man Theories This is the granddaddy of leadership concepts. The earliest studies of leadership adopted the belief that leaders (who were always thought of as male) were born with certain heroic leadership traits and natural abilities of power and in�luence. In organizations, social movements, religions, governments, and the military, leadership was conceptualized as a single “Great Man” who put everything together and in�luenced others to follow along based on the strength of inherited traits, qualities, and abilities.
Trait Theories Studies of these larger-than-life leaders spurred research into the various traits that de�ined a leader. Beginning in the 1920s, researchers looked to see if leaders had particular traits or characteristics, such as intelligence or energy, that distinguished them from nonleaders and contributed to success. It was thought that if traits could be identi�ied, leaders could be predicted, or perhaps even trained. Although research failed to produce a list of traits that would always guarantee leadership success, the interest in leadership characteristics has continued to the present day.
Behavior Theories The failure to identify a universal set of leadership traits led researchers in the early 1950s to begin looking at what a leader does rather than who he or she is. One line of research focused on what leaders actually do on the job, such as various management activities, roles, and responsibilities. These studies were soon expanded to try to determine how effective leaders differ in their behavior from ineffective ones. Researchers looked at how a leader behaved toward followers and how this correlated with leadership effectiveness or ineffectiveness. Chapter 2 discusses trait and behavior theories.
Contingency Theories Researchers next began to consider the contextual and situational variables that in�luence what leadership behaviors will be effective. The idea behind contingency theories is that leaders can analyze their situations and tailor their behavior to improve leadership effectiveness. Major situational variables are the characteristics of followers, characteristics of the work environment and follower tasks, and the external environment. Contingency theories, sometimes called situational theories , emphasize that leadership cannot be understood in a vacuum separate from various elements of the group or organizational situation. Chapter 3 covers contingency theories.
In�luence Theories These theories examine in�luence processes between leaders and followers. One primary topic of study is charismatic leadership ( Chapter 12 ), which refers to leadership in�luence based not on position or formal authority but, rather, on the qualities and charismatic personality of the leader. Related areas of study are leadership vision ( Chapter 13 ) and organizational culture ( Chapter 14 ). Leaders in�luence people to change by providing an inspiring vision of the future and shaping the culture and values needed to attain it. Several chapters of this text relate to the topic of in�luence because it is essential to understanding leadership.
Relational Theories Since the late 1970s, many ideas of leadership have focused on the relational aspect, that is, how leaders and followers interact and in�luence one another. Rather than being seen as something a leader does to a follower, leadership is viewed as a relational process that meaningfully engages all participants and enables each person to contribute to achieving the vision. Interpersonal relationships are seen as the most important facet of leadership effectiveness. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tktmu663mpbjz3v35982#HZXWQCXJ9V8X8T7WP020) Two signi�icant relational theories are transformational leadership ( Chapter 12 ) and servant leadership ( Chapter 6 ).
Based on Susan R. Komives, Nance Lucas, and Timothy R. McMahon, Exploring Leadership: For College Students Who Want to Make a Difference (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998); and Shann R. Ferch and Matthew M. Mitchell, “Intentional Forgiveness in Relational Leadership: A Technique for Enhancing Effective Leadership,” The Journal of Leadership Studies 7, no. 4 (2001), pp. 70–83.
Other important relational topics covered in various chapters of the text include the personal qualities that leaders need to build effective relationships, such as emotional intelligence, a leader's mind, integrity and high moral standards, and personal
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 43/217
courage. In addition, leaders build relationships through motivation and empowerment, leadership communication, team leadership, and embracing diversity.
1-4b. A Model of Leadership Evolution
Exhibit 1.4 provides a framework for examining the evolution of leadership from the early Great Man theories to today's relational theories. Each cell in the model summarizes an era of leadership thinking that was dominant in its time but may be less appropriate for today's world. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tktmu663mpbjz3v35982#CNPFTSS0CP4NT4BHT211)
This discussion draws ideas from Boneau and Thompson, “Leadership 4.0: It's a Brave New Approach.”
Exhibit 1.4. Leadership Evolution
Leadership Era 1 This era may be conceptualized as pre-industrial and pre-bureaucratic. Most organizations were small and were run by a single individual who many times hired workers because they were friends or relatives, not necessarily because of their skills or quali�ications. The size and simplicity of organizations and the stable nature of the environment made it easy for a single person to understand the big picture, coordinate and control all activities, and keep things on track. This is the era of Great Man leadership and the emphasis on personal traits of leaders. A leader was conceptualized as a single hero who saw the big picture and how everything �it into a whole.
Leadership Era 2 In Era 2, we see the emergence of hierarchy and bureaucracy. Although the world remains stable, organizations have begun to grow so large that they require rules and standard procedures to ensure that activities are performed ef�iciently and effectively. Hierarchies of authority provide a sensible mechanism for supervision and control of workers, and decisions once based on rules of thumb or tradition are replaced with precise procedures. This era sees the rise of the “rational manager” who directs and controls others using an impersonal approach. Employees aren't expected to think for themselves; they are expected to do as they're told, follow rules and procedures, and accomplish speci�ic tasks. The focus is on details rather than the big picture.
The rational manager was well-suited to a stable environment. The behavior and contingency theories worked here because leaders could analyze their situation, develop careful plans, and control what happened. But rational management is no longer suf�icient for leadership in today's world.
New Leader Action Memo
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 44/217
As a leader, you can use the leadership skills that �it the correct era for your organization. You can use in�luence and relational aspects as appropriate for your organization.
Leadership Era 3 This era represented a tremendous shock to managers in North America and Europe. Suddenly, the world was no longer stable, and the prized techniques of rational management were no longer successful. Beginning with the OPEC oil embargo of 1972 to 1973 and continuing with the severe global competition of the 1980s and early 1990s, many managers saw that environmental conditions had become chaotic. The Japanese began to dominate world commerce with their ideas of team leadership and superb quality. This became an era of great confusion for leaders. They tried team-based approaches, downsizing, reengineering, quality programs, and empowerment as ways to improve performance and get more motivation and commitment from employees.
This is the era of the team leader and the change leader. In�luence was important because of the need to change organizational structures and cultures. This era sees the emergence of knowledge work, an emphasis on horizontal collaboration, and a shift to in�luence theories. Rather than conceiving of leadership as one person always being �irmly “in charge,” leadership is often shared among team leaders and members, shifting to the person with the most knowledge or expertise in the matter at hand. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tktmu663mpbjz3v35982#KJUSFZ3NP1ZJXQCSR364)
Craig L. Pearce, “The Future of Leadership: Combining Vertical and Shared Leadership to Transform Knowledge Work,” Academy of Management Executive 18, no. 1 (2004), pp. 47–57.
Leadership Era 4 Enter the digital, mobile, social-media age. It seems that everything is changing, and changing fast. Era 4 represents agile leadership , which means giving up control in the traditional sense to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness to a changing world. Leaders in�luence others through relationships and networks and through shared vision and values rather than through hierarchical power and control. Agile leaders are constantly experimenting, learning, and changing, in both their personal and professional lives, and they encourage the development and growth of other people and the organization. Era 4 requires the full scope of leadership that goes far beyond rational management or even team leadership.
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 45/217
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 46/217
Implications The �low from Great Man leadership to rational management to team leadership to agile leadership illustrates trends in the larger world. The implication is that leadership re�lects the era or context of the organization and society. Most of today's organizations and leaders are still struggling with the transition from a stable to a chaotic environment and the new skills and qualities needed in this circumstance. Thus, Era 3 issues of diversity, team leadership, empowerment, and horizontal relationships are increasingly relevant. In addition, many leaders are rapidly shifting into Era 4 leadership by focusing on change management and facilitating a vision and values to encourage high performance, agility, and continuous adaptation in a
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
agile leadership giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational �lexibility and responsiveness
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 47/217
fast-shifting world. Agile leaders align themselves with new social technologies that can create networks of leaders throughout the organization. Era 3 and Era 4 leadership is what much of this book is about.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 48/217
1-5. Leadership Can Be Learned
New Leader Action Memo
Leader's Self-Insight 1.3 gives you a chance to test your people skills and see if there are areas you need to work on.
Many leaders are caught in the transition between the practices and principles that de�ined the industrial era and the new reality of the twenty-�irst century. Attempts to achieve collaboration, empowerment, and diversity in organizations may fail because the beliefs and thought processes of leaders as well as employees are stuck in an old paradigm that values control, stability, and homogeneity. It is dif�icult for many leaders to let go of methods and practices that have made them and their organizations successful in the past. Yet leaders can make the leap to a new paradigm by intentionally practicing and applying new paradigm principles.
Leader's Self-Insight 1.3. Are You on a Fast Track to Nowhere?
Instructions: Many people on the fast track toward positions of leadership �ind themselves suddenly derailed and don't know why. Many times, a lack of people skills is to blame. To help you determine whether you need to work on your people skills, take the following quiz, answering each item as Mostly False or Mostly True. Think about a job or volunteer position you have now or have held in the past as you answer the following items.
People Skills Mostly False Mostly True 1. Other people describe me as very good with people. 2. I often smile and laugh with teammates or classmates. 3. I often reach out to engage people, even strangers. 4. I often express appreciation to other people.
Dealing with Authority Mostly False Mostly True 1. I quickly speak out in meetings when leaders ask for comments or ideas. 2. If I see a leader making a decision that seems harmful, I speak up. 3. I experience no tension when interacting with senior managers, either inside or
outside the organization.
4. I have an easy time asserting myself toward people in authority.
Networking Mostly False Mostly True 1. I spend part of each week networking with colleagues in other departments. 2. I have joined multiple organizations for the purpose of making professional
contacts.
3. I often use lunches to meet and network with new people. 4. I actively maintain contact with peers from previous organizations.
Scoring and Interpretation
Tally the number of “Mostly Trues” checked for each set of questions.
People Skills: Dealing with Authority: Networking:
If you scored 4 in an area, you're right on track. Continue to act in the same way.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 49/217
If your score is 2 – 3, you can �ine-tune your skills in that area. Review the questions where you said Mostly False and work to add those abilities to your leadership skill set.
A score of 0 – 1 indicates that you may end up dangerously close to derailment. You should take the time to do an in- depth self-assessment and �ind ways to expand your interpersonal skills.
1-5a. Leader Fatal Flaws
One of the most important aspects of shifting to the new paradigm of leadership is intentionally using soft, interpersonal skills to build a culture of performance, trust, and collaboration. A few clues about the importance of acquiring new leadership skills are brought to light by studies that look at what causes managers to “derail” in their careers. Derailment refers to a phenomenon in organizations in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and the manager's personal skills and qualities. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/khhrccz2rn0te4epr632#NZRHBEUYZ4E0ZZRFM604) Studies conducted in numerous organizations in different countries indicate that managers fail more frequently because they are de�icient with soft, human skills rather than a lack of hard work or technical skills. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/khhrccz2rn0te4epr632#VBVK83BDX5RAZYQ03736) Derailed managers are successful people who excelled in a functional area and were expected to go far, but they reached a plateau, were �ired, or were forced to retire early.
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 50/217
a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 51/217
Yi Zhang, Jean Brittain Leslie, and Kelly M. Hannum, “Trouble Ahead: Derailment Is Alive and Well,” Thunderbird International Business Review 55, no. 1 (January–February 2013), pp. 95–102.
See studies reported in Joyce Hogan, Robert Hogan, and Robert B. Kaiser, “Management Derailment: Personality Assessment and Mitigation,” Hogan Assessment Systems , http://www.hoganassessments.com/_hoganweb/documents/Management_Derailment.pdf (http://www.hoganassessments.com/_hoganweb/documents/Management_Derailment.pdf) .
Researchers at the Center for Creative Leadership in Greensboro, North Carolina, have been looking at what causes manager derailment for two decades. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/khhrccz2rn0te4epr632#PYJAHREJFMQD39TKT876) They conclude that there are �ive top �laws that cause managers to derail, as shown in Exhibit 1.5 . Note that many of these �laws relate to the lack of human skills. Unsuccessful managers fail to meet business objectives because they spend too much time promoting themselves rather than working. They are overly ambitious and sel�ish and may not follow through on promises. They are often insensitive and critical, not trustworthy, do not learn from feedback and mistakes, can't build and develop the right teams, and are unable to see the big picture when promoted into a general management position. Additional studies con�irm that the biggest leader mistakes are people mistakes rather than technical ones. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/khhrccz2rn0te4epr632#RQNSXYK76L6YUPNX3256)
a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
Derailment a phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can't advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 52/217
Yi Zhang et al., “Trouble Ahead: Derailment Is Alive and Well”; and Morgan W. McCall Jr. and Michael M. Lombardo, “ Off the Track: Why and How Successful Executives Get Derailed ” (Technical Report No. 21), (Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership, January 1983).
Hogan et al., “Management Derailment: Personality Assessment and Mitigation”; George Kohlrieser, “People Mistakes: These 10 Are Very Dangerous,” Leadership Excellence (October 2012), p. 16; Clinton O. Longenecker and Laurence S. Fink, “Fixing Management's Fatal Flaws,” Industrial Management (July–August 2012), pp. 12–17; E. Van Velsor and J. B. Leslie, “Why Executives Derail: Perspectives Across Time and Cultures,” Academy of Management Executive 9, no. 4 (1995), pp. 62–72; and Morgan W. McCall Jr. and Michael M. Lombardo, “ Off the Track: Why and How Successful Executives Get Derailed ” (Technical Report No. 21), (Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership, January 1983).
Exhibit 1.5. Five Fatal Flaws that Cause Derailment
Source: Based on Yi Zhang, Jean Brittain Leslie, and Kelly M. Hannum, “Trouble Ahead: Derailment Is Alive and Well,” Thunderbird International Business Review 55, no. 1 (January–February 2013), pp. 95–102.
1-5b. Leader Good Behaviors
The best leaders, at all levels, are those who are genuinely interested in other people and �ind ways to bring out the best in them. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/khhrccz2rn0te4epr632#DKJNKJ7MEF1WMXGB6983) Successful organizations, such as Google, pay attention to developing leaders in the soft skills needed to effectively lead technical people in a changing environment.
Ram Charan and Geoffrey Colvin, “Why CEOs Fail,” Fortune (June 21, 1999), pp. 68–78.
In the Lead Google
In 2015, Google was named the best company to work for by Fortune magazine for the sixth year in a row. Being a great place to work didn't happen by accident. Google's human resources department, called People Operations—or POPS for short—monitors employees' happiness and well-being to an incredible degree, using data to track everything and learn where improvements are needed.
One thing it discovered is that good leaders make a tremendous difference. Google looked at what successful leaders— those who have lower attrition rates and get better performance from their teams—do that makes them different from less successful ones. Analyzing performance reviews and feedback surveys, Google executives used the �indings to help make bad leaders better. Even in a company that depends on technical expertise, Google found that soft, human skills are essential. Technical expertise ranked dead last among eight desirable leader qualities, as shown in “Google's Eight Rules for Good Leader Behavior.”
Google discovered that employees want leaders who listen to them, build positive and productive relationships, and show an interest in their lives and careers. Google incorporates these eight desirable leader behaviors into leadership performance and evaluation systems as well as into feedback and training programs. When the company targeted unsuccessful leaders and coached them to develop soft skills and display these eight behaviors, the managerial ranks improved, with collective feedback scores going up every year since 2009. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/khhrccz2rn0te4epr632#JGLGDXA0BTQWNAA8N086)
This example is based on Farhad Manjoo, “The Happiness Machine: How Google Became Such a Great Place to Work,” Slate Magazine , http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/01/google_people_operations_the_secrets_of_the_world_s_most_scienti�ic_human.html (http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/01/google_people_operations_the_secrets_of_the_world_s_most_scienti�ic_human.html) (accessed March 8, 2013); and David A. Garvin, “How Google Sold Its Engineers on Management,” Harvard Business Review (December 2013), pp. 74–82.
Google's Eight Rules for Good Leader Behavior
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 53/217
1. Be a good coach.
2. Empower your team and don't micromanage.
3. Express interest in team members' success and personal well-being.
4. Don't be a sissy. Be productive and results-oriented.
5. Be a good communicator and listen to your team.
6. Help your employees with career development.
7. Have a clear vision and strategy for the team.
8. Have key technical skills so you can help advise the team. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/khhrccz2rn0te4epr632#VPGR9D0WBB80T3507449)
List of Google's Rules from Adam Bryant, “Google's Quest to Build a Better Boss,” The New York Times (March 12, 2011).
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can cultivate your people skills to avoid executive derailment. You can treat others with kindness, interest, and respect and avoid overmanaging by selecting good followers and delegating effectively.
The skills on Google's list of desirable behaviors can help leaders avoid the fatal �laws that derail careers. In addition, today's successful leaders intentionally value change over stability, empowerment over control, collaboration over competition, diversity over uniformity, and integrity over self-interest, as discussed earlier. The industry of executive coaching emerged partly to help people through the transition to a new paradigm of leadership. Executive coaches encourage leaders to confront their own �laws and hang-ups that inhibit effective leadership, and then help them develop stronger emotional and interpersonal skills.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 54/217
1-6. Mastering the Art and Science of Leadership There's an age-old question: Are leaders born or made? In one survey, 19 percent of top executives said leaders are born, 52 percent said they are made, and 29 percent said they are both born and made. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rwlmm7aa04g0hxyzg900#ZWCGX92D6HW6THCYX435) It may be true that some inborn qualities and personality characteristics can provide a foundation for being a good leader, but most people can learn to be good leaders no matter their innate characteristics. Interestingly, in the above-mentioned survey, both those who thought leaders are born and those who thought they are made mention learning from experience as a key to becoming a good leader.
Survey by the Center for Creative Leadership, reported in Phaedra Brotherton, “Leadership: Nature or Nurture?” T+D (February 2013), p. 25.
Leadership can be learned, but it is important to remember that leadership is both an art and a science. It is an art because many leadership skills and qualities cannot be learned from a textbook. Leadership takes practice and hands-on experience, as well as intense personal exploration and development. However, leadership is also a science because a growing body of knowledge and objective facts describes the leadership process and how to use leadership skills to attain organizational goals. This is where a textbook or a course on leadership can help you to be a better leader.
Knowing about leadership research helps people analyze situations from a variety of perspectives and learn how to be more effective. By exploring leadership in both business and society, students gain an understanding of the importance of leadership to an organization's success, as well as the dif�iculties and challenges involved in being a leader. Studying leadership can also lead to the discovery of abilities you never knew you had. When students in a leadership seminar at Wharton were asked to pick one leader to represent the class, one woman was surprised when she outpolled all other students. Her leadership was drawn out not in the practice of leadership in student government, volunteer activities, or athletics but in a classroom setting. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rwlmm7aa04g0hxyzg900#GMMVQ4MJ4UQK1ZDA5533) Studying leadership gives you skills you can apply to the practice of leadership in your everyday life. Exhibit 1.6 gives some tips for how you can begin honing your leadership skills.
Russell Palmer, “Can Leadership Be Learned?” Business Today (Fall 1989), pp. 100–102.
Exhibit 1.6. Learning to Be a Leader
Source: Based on “Guidelines for the Apprentice Leader,” in Robert J. Allio, “Masterclass: Leaders and Leadership—Many Theories, But What Advice Is Reliable?” Strategy & Leadership 41, no. 1 (2013), pp. 4–14.
Many people have never tried to be leaders because they have no understanding of what leaders actually do. The chapters in this book are designed to help you gain a �irm knowledge of what leadership means and some of the skills and qualities that make a good leader. You can build competence in both the art and the science of leadership by completing the Self-Insight exercises throughout the book, by working on the activities and cases at the end of each chapter, and by applying the concepts
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 55/217
you learn in class, in your relationships with others, in student groups, at work, and in voluntary organizations. Although this book and your instructors can guide you in your development, only you can apply the concepts and principles of leadership in your daily life. Learning to be a leader starts now, with you. Are you up to the challenge?
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 56/217
1-7. Organization of this Book The plan for this book re�lects the shift to a new paradigm summarized in Exhibit 1.2 and the discussion of management versus leadership summarized in Exhibit 1.3 . The framework in Exhibit 1.7 illustrates the organization of the book.
Exhibit 1.7. Framework for the Book
Part 1 introduces leadership, its importance, and the transition to a new leadership paradigm. Part 2 explores basic research perspectives that evolved during a more stable time when rational management approaches were effective. These basic perspectives, including the Great Man and trait theories, behavior theories, and contingency theories, are relevant to dealing with speci�ic tasks and individuals and are based on a premise that leaders can predict and control various aspects of the environment to keep the organization running smoothly.
Parts 3, 4, and 5 focus on leadership perspectives that re�lect the paradigm shift to the turbulent, unpredictable nature of the environment and the need for fresh leader approaches. Part 3 discusses the personal side of leadership and looks at some of the qualities and forces that are required to be effective in the new reality. These chapters emphasize the importance of self- awareness and self-understanding, the development of one's own leadership mind and heart, moral leadership and courage, and appreciating the role of followership. Part 4 is about building effective relationships, including motivating and empowering others, communicating as a leader, leading teams, embracing the diversity of today's world, and using power and in�luence.
Part 5 brings together all of these ideas to examine the leader as builder of a social architecture that can help an organization create a brighter future. These chapters deal with creating vision and strategic direction, aligning culture and values to achieve the vision, and leading change.
Taken together, the sections and chapters paint a complete portrait of the leadership experience as it has evolved to the present day and emphasize the new paradigm skills and qualities that are relevant from today and into the future. This book blends systematic research evidence with real-world experiences and impact.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 57/217
Leadership Essentials This chapter introduced the concept of leadership and explained how individuals can grow as leaders. Leadership is de�ined as an in�luence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that re�lect their shared purposes. Thus leadership involves people in a relationship, in�luence, change, a shared purpose, and taking personal responsibility to make things happen. Most of us are aware of famous leaders, but most leadership that changes the world starts small and may begin with personal frustrations about events that prompt people to initiate change and inspire others to follow them. Your leadership may be expressed in the classroom, at work, or in your neighborhood, religious community, or volunteer organizations.
Concepts of leadership have evolved over time. Major research approaches include Great Man theories, trait theories, behavior theories, contingency theories, in�luence theories, and relational theories. Elements of all these approaches are still applicable to the study of leadership.
The biggest challenge facing leaders today is the changing world that wants a new paradigm of leadership. The new reality involves the shift from stability to change, from control to empowerment, from competition to collaboration, and from uniformity to diversity. In addition, the concept of leader as hero is giving way to that of the humble leader who develops others and shares credit for accomplishments. These dramatic changes suggest that a philosophy based on control and personal ambition will probably fail in the new era. The challenge for leaders is to evolve to a new mindset that relies on human skills, integrity, and teamwork.
The “soft” skills of leadership complement the “hard” skills of management, and both are needed to effectively guide organizations. Although leadership is often equated with good management, leadership and management are different processes. Management strives to maintain stability and improve ef�iciency. Leadership, on the other hand, is about creating a vision for the future, designing social architecture that shapes culture and values, inspiring and motivating followers, developing personal qualities, and creating change within a culture of integrity. Leadership can be integrated with management to achieve the greatest possible outcomes. Organizations need to be both managed and led, particularly in today's turbulent environment. Many managers already have the qualities needed to be effective leaders, but they may not have gone through the process needed to bring these qualities to life. Leadership is an intentional act. It is important to remember that most people are not born with natural leadership skills and qualities, but leadership can be learned and developed.
Discussion Questions 1. Look through recent magazines and newspapers and identify one leader who seems to illustrate the “leader-as-hero” mindset and one who seems more typical of the humble Level 5 leader described in the text. Describe their differing characteristics. Which was easier to �ind?
2. What do you consider your own strengths and weaknesses for leadership? Discuss your answer with another student.
3. Of the elements in the leadership de�inition as illustrated in Exhibit 1.1 , which is the easiest for you? Which is hardest? Explain.
4. How might the paradigm shift from competition to collaboration make the job of a leader more dif�icult? Could it also make the leader's job easier? Discuss.
5. Describe the best leader you have known. How did this leader acquire his or her capability?
6. Why do you think there are so few people who succeed at both management and leadership? Is it reasonable to believe someone can be good at both? Discuss.
7. Discuss some recent events and societal changes that might have contributed to a shift “from hero to humble.” Do you agree or disagree that humility is important for good leadership?
8. “Leadership is more concerned with people than is management.” Do you agree? Discuss.
9. What personal capacities should a person develop to be a good leader versus those developed to be a good manager?
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 58/217
10. Why is leadership considered both an art and a science?
Leadership at Work
Leadership Right–Wrong
Leader Wrong: Think of a speci�ic situation in which you were working with someone who was in a leadership position over you and that person was doing something that was wrong for you. This person might have been a coach, teacher, team leader, employer, immediate boss, family member, or anyone who had a leadership position over you. “Wrong for you” means that person's behavior reduced your effectiveness, made you or your coworkers less productive, and was demotivating to you or your colleagues. Write a few words below that describe what the leader was doing that was wrong for you .
Think of a second situation in which someone in a leadership position did something wrong for you. Write a few words below that describe what the leader was doing that was wrong for you .
Leader Right: Think of a speci�ic situation in which you were working with someone who was in a leadership position over you and that person was doing something that was right for you. This person might have been a coach, teacher, team leader, employer, immediate boss, family member, or anyone who had a leadership position over you. “Right for you” means that person's behavior made you or your coworkers more productive, highly motivated you or others, and removed barriers to make you more successful. Write a few words below that describe what the leader was doing that was right for you .
Think of a second situation in which someone in a leadership position did something right for you. Write a few words below that describe what the leader was doing that was right for you .
The previous answers are data points that can help you understand the impact of leader behaviors. Analyze your four incidents —what are the underlying qualities of leadership that enable you to be an effective performer? Discuss your answers with another student. What leadership themes are present in the eight combined incidents? What do these responses tell you about the qualities you want and don't want in your leaders?
In Class: An interesting way to use this exercise in class is to have students write (�ive words maximum) their leader “rights” on one board and their leader “wrongs” on another board. The instructor can ask small groups to identify underlying themes in the collective set of leader data points on the boards to specify what makes an effective leader. After students establish four or �ive key themes, they can be challenged to identify the one key theme that distinguishes leaders who are effective from those who are not.
Source: Based on Melvin R. McKnight, “Organizational Behavior as a Phenomenological, Free-Will Centered Science,” Working Paper, College of Business Administration, Northern Arizona University, 1997.
Leadership Development: Cases for Analysis
Sales Engineering Division
When DGL International, a manufacturer of re�inery equipment, brought in John Terrill to manage its Sales Engineering division, company executives informed him of the urgent situation. Sales Engineering, with 20 engineers, was the highest-paid, best-educated, and least-productive division in the company. The instructions to Terrill: Turn it around. Terrill called a meeting of the engineers. He showed great concern for their personal welfare and asked point blank: “What's the problem? Why can't we produce? Why does this division have such turnover?”
Without hesitation, employees launched a hail of complaints. “I was hired as an engineer, not a pencil pusher.” “We spend over half of our time writing asinine reports in triplicate for top management, and no one reads the reports.” “We have to account for every penny, which doesn't give us time to work with customers or new developments.”
After a two-hour discussion, Terrill began to envision a future in which engineers were free to work with customers and join self-directed teams for product improvement. Terrill concluded he had to get top management off the engineers' backs. He promised the engineers, “My job is to stay out of your way so you can do your work, and I'll try to keep top management off your backs, too.” He called for the day's reports and issued an order effective immediately that the originals be turned in daily to his of�ice rather than mailed to headquarters. For three weeks, technical reports piled up on his desk. By month's end, the stack
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 59/217
was nearly three feet high. During that time no one called for the reports. When other managers entered his of�ice and saw the stack, they usually asked, “What's all this?” Terrill answered, “Technical reports.” No one asked to read them.
Finally, at month's end, a secretary from �inance called and asked for the monthly travel and expense report. Terrill responded, “Meet me in the president's of�ice tomorrow morning.”
The next morning the engineers cheered as Terrill walked through the department pushing a cart loaded with the enormous stack of reports. They knew the showdown had come.
Terrill entered the president's of�ice and placed the stack of reports on his desk. The president and the other senior executives looked bewildered.
“This,” Terrill announced, “is the reason for the lack of productivity in the Sales Engineering division. These are the reports your people require every month. The fact that they sat on my desk all month shows that no one reads this material. I suggest that the engineers' time could be used in a more productive manner, and that one brief monthly report from my of�ice will satisfy the needs of the other departments.”
Questions 1. Does John Terrill's leadership style �it the de�inition of leadership in Exhibit 1.1 ? Is it part of a leader's job to manage upward? Explain.
2. With respect to Exhibit 1.4 , in what leadership era is Terrill? In what era is headquarters? Explain.
3. What approach would you have taken in this situation? What do you think the response of the senior executives will be to Terrill's action?
The Marshall Plan
Marshall Gordon was recognized by associates and competitors as a man on a mission . One of four members of the design team for a large chair manufacturing corporation, Marshall's obsession with the creation of comfortable seating dated to a childhood back injury and a lifetime of pain. He recognized, more than most in the industry, the importance of designing chairs that offered some relief to those suffering from debilitating back, hip, and neck pain as well as helping people of all ages to avoid problems with proper posture. In his early days with the company the staff jokingly called his approach the Marshall Plan, after America's 1947 initiative (named for Secretary of State George Marshall) to rebuild European economies after the war. Like someone �ighting to save the world, Marshall Gordon brought passion and a creative intensity to design meetings as if each drawing, each design tweak would change civilization as we knew it.
Single and with no apparent family or friendship ties, Marshall was married to his work. He seemed to thrive on 70-hour work weeks, although as a salaried manager, he received no overtime pay. Even his “down time” at meals or on weekends was spent sketching, studying the latest in ergonomics, or reconnoitering each design adjustment by competitors.
“When you visit a furniture store, you fully expect to see Marshall, skulking about in trench coat and hat, checking to see what the competition is offering,” says fellow team member John Craddock. “We all laugh about it. The guy brings—actually brings— chairs to meetings and tears them apart to show us some miniscule discovery .”
This obsession with chairs, pain and gravity, and one-upping the competition has made Marshall a valuable employee and earned him a reputation in the industry for creative design. Not since Peter Opsvik's Gravity Balans ergonomic chair of the 1970s has anyone made such an impact on the industry. The effect of Marshall's work on company pro�its is undeniable. The fact that competitors are chomping at the bit to lure him away is also undeniable.
But the Marshall Plan comes at a price. Over the 15 years he has worked with the company, �ive as leader of the design group, there has been a constant turnover within the design group as frustrated workers leave the company to “get away from Marshall.”
“Anything you could learn from this brilliant and dedicated man is destroyed by his cold, calculating attitude,” Craddock complains. “I came to this company excited about the chance to work with him. But any knowledge he possesses is carefully guarded. His design ideas are perfect, while ours are picked apart. We all swear he has listening devices scattered around everywhere, because if the rest of the team huddles in some corner of the world to discuss a design idea, voila ! He walks into the next meeting with our idea. Once when he was a few minutes late to a meeting, we thought we had beaten him and quickly
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 60/217
presented our idea. Just then, he walks in, and announces, ‘Ideas must be in the air. I have something very similar,’ and throws his completed design on screen. Guess who won.”
Marshall presents a continuing challenge to company management, having both incredible positive and negative in�luence on the culture. While his contributions to design and pro�its far exceed those of other employees, his negative effect on the culture and his team's creativity and morale results in the loss of talented people and a climate of suspicion and discontent. His threat, “I can take my talents elsewhere,” hangs over top management like a sledge hammer.
Now, Craddock and Leslie Warren, other talented members of the design team, have approached management with their own ultimatum: Do something about Marshall or we resign .
Questions 1. If you were a top leader, how would you respond to the ultimatum? Be speci�ic. Explain why.
2. What is Marshall missing with respect to his leadership abilities? How do you explain his poor leadership behavior?
3. If you were Marshall's manager, how might you increase Marshall's awareness of the negative impact he is having on his team? How would you guide him toward better team leadership, sharing his knowledge with others, and mentoring his team members?
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 61/217
Part 2. Research Perspectives on Leadership
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 62/217
Chapter 2 . Traits, Behaviors, and Relationships
Your Leadership Challenge After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
Outline some personal traits and characteristics that are associated with effective leaders. Identify your own traits that you can transform into strengths and bring to a leadership role. Distinguish among various roles leaders play in organizations, including operations roles, collaborative roles, and advisory roles, and where your strengths might best �it. Recognize autocratic versus democratic leadership behavior and the impact of each. Know the distinction between people-oriented and task-oriented leadership behavior and when each should be used. Understand how the theory of individualized leadership has broadened the understanding of relationships between leaders and followers. Describe some key characteristics of entrepreneurial leaders.
Soon after her husband was elected the �irst African American president in the United States, Michelle Obama appeared on “The Tonight Show” wearing a stylish out�it consisting of a pencil skirt, a yellow and brown tank top, and a mustard yellow cardigan. When then-host Jay Leno asked about her wardrobe, saying “I'm guessing about 60 grand? Sixty, 70 thousand for that out�it?” she replied, “Actually, this is a J. Crew ensemble.” The audience roared. Obama also incorporated J. Crew items into her inauguration look. The man behind J. Crew, Millard S. (Mickey) Drexler, is a retail legend, known as both a visionary and something of a control freak. He turned Gap into a global fashion powerhouse in the 1990s, started Old Navy a decade or so later, and transformed J. Crew into a cult brand in the early years of the twenty-�irst century. When he took over as CEO, J. Crew was deeply in debt and struggling to survive. At the age of 70, Drexler is still going strong, but his leadership style and tendency to micromanage and focus on every detail, from vetting every new employee to deciding on the size of pockets or the look of a label, has recently come under scrutiny. By late 2015, even though J. Crew was still popular, sales were falling and the magic was fading. Yet owners continued to support Drexler and give him free rein as CEO. “Call it ‘the great man’ problem,” one New York Times reporter phrased it, questioning whether any company should be so closely tied to the characteristics, style, and actions of one individual. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ezvu8mc54t6av03k5186#LGWA24CQCM78KSJ9K362)
Steven Davidoff Solomon, “J. Crew Struggles with Its ‘Great Man’ Dilemma,” The New York Times (June 10, 2015), p. B4; Stephanie Clifford, “J. Crew Bene�its As Mrs. Obama Wears the Brand,” The New York Times (November 17, 2008), http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/17/business/media/17crew.html?_r=0 (accessed October 8, 2015); and Keith Bedford, “Mickey Drexler Leads J. Crew by Doing the Things Managers Aren't Supposed To,” Quartz http://qz.com/181569/j-crew-mickey-drexler-leads-by-doing- everything-managers-arent-supposed-to/ (accessed October 8, 2015).
We introduced the idea of “Great Man” leadership in Chapter 1 , and the Mickey Drexler example shows that the concept hasn't completely died. The earliest leadership studies proposed that certain people had natural traits and abilities of power and in�luence that enabled them to put everything together and in�luence others in a way that other people could not. Although few today would argue that leadership is based on inborn traits, interest in the characteristics that de�ine a good leader continues. As this example illustrates, current thinking on leadership incorporates a variety of ideas and concepts from the past.
Personal traits captured the imagination of the earliest leadership researchers, but if we look at any two successful and effective leaders they will likely share some traits but have others that are quite dissimilar. Each individual has a unique set of qualities, characteristics, and strengths to bring to a leadership role. In addition, leaders can learn to overcome some potentially limiting traits, such as a lack of self-con�idence or a quick temper. Consequently, many researchers have examined the behavior of leaders to determine what behavioral features comprise leadership style and how particular behaviors relate to effective leadership.
This chapter �irst examines the evolution of the trait approach and the importance of leaders understanding and applying their own unique leadership strengths. Then we provide an overview of the behavior approach and introduce the theory of individualized leadership, which looks at behavior between a leader and each individual follower, differentiating one-on-one behavior from leader-to-group behavior. The path illuminated by the research into leader traits and behaviors is a foundation for the �ield of leadership studies and still enjoys remarkable dynamism for explaining leader success or failure.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 63/217
2-1. The Trait Approach Traits are the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance. Research early in the twentieth century examined leaders who had achieved a level of greatness and hence became known as the Great Man approach. Fundamental to this theory was the idea that some people are born with traits that make them natural leaders. The Great Man approach sought to identify the traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders. Generally, research found only a weak relationship between personal traits and leader success. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#ASMRNYUDY7RMQ5BCF502) Indeed, the diversity of traits that effective leaders possess indicates that leadership ability is not a genetic endowment.
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 64/217
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 65/217
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 66/217
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 67/217
G. A. Yukl, Leadership in Organizations (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1981); and S. C. Kohs and K. W. Irle, “Prophesying Army Promotion,” Journal of Applied Psychology 4 (1920), pp. 73–87.
Nevertheless, with the advancement of the �ield of psychology during the 1940s and 1950s, trait approach researchers expanded their examination of personal attributes by using aptitude and psychological tests. These early studies looked at personality traits such as creativity and self-con�idence, physical traits such as age and energy level, abilities such as knowledge and �luency of speech, social characteristics such as popularity and sociability, and work-related characteristics such as the desire to excel and persistence against obstacles. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#UCMEHNGCARJU0NH2W134)
Yukl, Leadership in Organizations , p. 254.
In a 1948 literature review, * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#HXMFGV898HHM856F7792) Stogdill examined more than 100 studies based on the trait approach. He uncovered several traits that appeared consistent with effective leadership, including general intelligence, initiative, interpersonal skills, self-con�idence, drive for responsibility, and personal integrity. Stogdill's �indings also indicated, however, that the importance of a particular trait was often relative to the situation. Initiative, for example, may contribute to the success of a leader in an entrepreneurial situation, but it may be irrelevant to a leader in a stable bureaucracy. Thus, possessing certain personal characteristics is no guarantee of success.
R. M. Stogdill, “Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survey of the Literature,” Journal of Psychology 25 (1948), pp. 35–71.
Many researchers discontinued their efforts to identify leadership traits in light of Stogdill's 1948 �indings and turned their attention to examining leader behavior and leadership situations. However, others continued with expanded trait lists and research projects. Stogdill's subsequent review of 163 trait studies conducted between 1948 and 1970 concluded that some personal traits do indeed seem to contribute to effective leadership. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#UHZX86LPBDVXFU0FG813) The study identi�ied many of the same traits found in the 1948 survey, along with several additional characteristics, including aggressiveness, independence, and tolerance for stress. However, Stogdill again cautioned that the value of a particular trait or set of traits varies with the organizational situation.
R. M. Stogdill, Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of the Literature (New York: The Free Press, 1974) ; and Bernard M. Bass, Bass & Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, 3rd ed. (New York: The Free Press, 1990).
In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in examining leadership traits. A review by Kirkpatrick and Locke identi�ied a number of personal traits that distinguish leaders from nonleaders, including some pinpointed by Stogdill. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#HNJAGM1N9KXXJM0W6145) Other studies have focused on followers' perceptions and indicate that certain traits are associated with people's perceptions of who is a leader. For example, one study found that the traits of intelligence, masculinity, and dominance were strongly related to how individuals perceived leaders. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#YDSH3KTEAYNSDMZKZ640) Others have found that charismatic CEOs are perceived to be more effective than other leaders, even though there is no evidence showing they actually are. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#BJHEEFH2WSCJAUS0V762)
S. A. Kirkpatrick and E. A. Locke, “Leadership: Do Traits Matter?” The Academy of Management Executive 5, no. 2 (1991), pp. 48–60.
R. G. Lord, C. L. DeVader, and G. M. Alliger, “A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Personality Traits and Leadership Perceptions: An Application of Validity Generalization Procedures,” Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (1986), pp. 402–410.
Traits the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-con�idence, and appearance
Great Man approach a leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 68/217
Study reported in “From the Front Lines: How Does Leadership Personality Affect Performance?” Leader to Leader (Winter 2007), pp. 56–57; and Bradley R. Agle, Nandu J. Nagarajan, Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld, and Dhinu Srinivasan, “Does CEO Charisma Matter? An Empirical Analysis of the Relationships among Organizational Performance, Environmental Uncertainty, and Top Management Team Perceptions of CEO Charisma,” Academy of Management Journal 49, no. 1 (2006), pp. 161–174.
“What I've really learned over time is that optimism is a very, very important part of leadership…. People don't like to follow pessimists.”
Robert Iger, Chairman and CEO of The Walt Disney Company
In summary, trait research has been an important part of leadership studies throughout the twentieth century and continues into the twenty-�irst, as illustrated by this chapter's Leader's Bookshelf , which suggests that a trait of sel�lessness is the secret to genuine and lasting leadership success. Several other traits, including optimism and a cheerful attitude, have recently gained attention as important for successful leaders. Britain's Royal Navy takes cheerfulness so seriously that it tracks how leader cheerfulness affects morale and effectiveness. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#UUXR6GWU5B6M2WYM5461) As discussed in Chapter 1 , humility, including a willingness to admit mistakes and make oneself vulnerable, has emerged as an important trait in today's collaborative world. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#SLJC9XRYB5UDVRZNK327)
Andrew St. George, “Leadership Lessons from the Royal Navy,” McKinsey Quarterly (January 2013), http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Leadership_lessons_from_the_Royal_Navy_3053 (accessed February 7, 2013).
Patrick Lencioni, “The Most Important Leadership Trait You Shun,” The Wall Street Journal (June 21, 2010), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704895204575321380627619388.html (accessed March 11, 2013).
Leader's Bookshelf Give and Take: A Revolutionary Approach to Success by Adam Grant
Contrary to popular belief, good guys don't always �inish last. In fact, in the book Give and Take: A Revolutionary Approach to Success , Adam Grant asserts that a trait of sel�lessness can help leaders be more effective and more successful. Grant, the youngest tenured professor ever at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, suggests that good leaders are those who give the most and view their success as “individual achievements that have a positive impact on others.”
ARE YOU A GIVER, A TAKER, OR A MATCHER?
Grant proposes that we all assume one of three basic approaches toward others—that of a giver , a taker , or a matcher .
Givers focus on what others need and give sel�lessly. They give time and energy, or anything else that is asked of them, without expecting anything in return. Grant uses the example of billionaire Jon Huntsman Sr., founder of Huntsman Chemical, who once left $200 million on the table when negotiating with a man whose wife had just died, simply because he thought it was the right thing to do. As leaders, givers more easily delegate and collaborate with others, listen to others, give credit to others, and share power and responsibility.
Takers put their own interests �irst. Takers are sel�ish people who want to win, no matter who else loses. As leaders, they typically try to in�luence others by gaining dominance and control over them. They collaborate only when it bene�its them personally and rarely share credit for successes. Takers often win in the short run but they are much less likely to build success over the long term.
Matchers strive for a balance of giving and taking. Matchers try to achieve an equal balance between what they give and what they get in return. As leaders, they network and collaborate strategically, expecting something in return that will be of bene�it to them. They play a juggling act in an effort to serve their individual interests while still being fair to others.
Does it Pay to be Nice?
Grant applies scienti�ic research and weaves in numerous real-life stories to support his premise that givers end up being the most successful among the three groups. His advice is to “focus attention and energy on making a difference in
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 69/217
the lives of others, and success might follow as a by-product.” Leaders who are givers help a wide range of people in the organization, develop everyone's skills to support the greater good, and strive to bring out the best in everyone. By investing in the success of their followers, leaders who are givers build their own success and a legacy of enduring greatness.
Give and Take , by Adam Grant, is published by Viking.
Exhibit 2.1 presents some of the traits and their respective categories that have been identi�ied through trait research over the years. Many researchers still contend that some traits are essential to effective leadership, but only in combination with other factors. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#SDJKSKXN1CJYWNDQ0406) A few traits typically considered highly important for leadership are optimism, self-con�idence, honesty and integrity, and drive.
Edwin Locke and Associates, The Essence of Leadership (New York: Lexington Books, 1991).
Exhibit 2.1. Some Leader Characteristics
Personal Characteristics Social Characteristics Energy Sociability, interpersonal skills Passion Cooperativeness Humility Ability to enlist cooperation Physical stamina Tact, diplomacy Intelligence and Ability Work-Related Characteristics Intelligence, cognitive ability Drive, desire to excel Knowledge Dependability Judgment, decisiveness Fair-mindedness Personality Perseverance, tenacity Optimism Social Background Cheerfulness Education Self-con�idence Mobility Honesty and integrity Charisma Desire to lead Independence
Sources: Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Management Applications, 3rd ed. (New York : The Free Press, 1990), pp. 80–81; S. A. Kirkpatrick and E. A. Locke, “Leadership: Do Traits Matter?” Academy of Management Executive 5, no. 2 (1991), pp. 48–60; and James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner, The Leadership Challenge: How to Get Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations (San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, 1990).
2-1a. Optimism and Self-Con�idence
New Leader Action Memo
People generally prefer to follow leaders who are optimistic rather than pessimistic about the future. Complete the questionnaire in Leader's Self-Insight 2.1 to assess your level of optimism.
Recent research points to a positive outlook and a cheerful attitude as keys to effective leadership. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#BEZY4UDELWZ774FYV262) Optimism refers to a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well. Numerous surveys indicate that optimism is the single characteristic most common to top executives. People rise to the top because they can see opportunities
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 70/217
where others see problems and can instill in others a sense of hope for the future. Leaders at all levels need some degree of optimism to see possibilities even through the thickest fog and rally people around a vision for a better tomorrow. Although hundreds of experiments support the notion that people possess ingrained tendencies toward either optimism or pessimism, leaders can train themselves to deliberately focus on the positive rather than the negative and interpret situations in more positive, optimistic ways. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#EKZKTVXD9HY8H92RP063)
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 71/217
A summary of various studies and surveys is reported in Del Jones, “Optimism Puts Rose-Colored Tint in Glasses of Top Execs,” USA Today (December 15, 2005).
See Elaine Fox, “The Essence of Optimism,” Scienti�ic American Mind (January–February 2013), pp. 22–27.
Leader's Self-Insight 2.1. Rate Your Optimism
Instructions : This questionnaire is designed to assess your level of optimism as re�lected in your hopefulness about the future. There are no right or wrong answers. Please indicate your personal feelings about whether each statement is Mostly False or Mostly True by checking the answer that best describes your attitude or feeling.
Mostly False Mostly True 1. I nearly always expect a lot from life.
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Optimism a tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 72/217
Mostly False Mostly True 2. I try to anticipate when things will go wrong. 3. I always see the positive side of things. 4. I often start out expecting the worst, although things usually work out okay. 5. I expect more good things to happen to me than bad. 6. I often feel concern about how things will turn out for me. 7. If something can go wrong for me, it usually does. 8. Even in dif�icult times, I usually expect the best. 9. I am cheerful and positive most of the time. 10. I consider myself an optimistic person.
Scoring and Interpretation
Give yourself one point for checking Mostly True for items 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10. Also give yourself one point for checking Mostly False for items 2, 4, 6, 7. Enter your score here: If your score is 8 or higher, it may mean that you are high on optimism. If your score is 3 or less, your view about the future may be pessimistic. For the most part, people like to follow a leader who is optimistic rather than negative about the future. However, too much optimism may exaggerate positive expectations that are never ful�illed. If your score is low, what can you do to view the world through a more optimistic lens?
Source: These questions were created based on several sources.
A related characteristic is having a positive attitude about oneself. Leaders who know themselves develop self-con�idence , which is general assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities. Self-con�idence doesn't mean being arrogant and prideful but rather knowing and trusting in oneself. Self-con�idence is related to self-ef�icacy , which refers to a person's strong belief that he or she can successfully accomplish a speci�ic task or outcome. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#KLWU045Q0TRCR4R04448) A leader who has a positive self-image and displays certainty about his or her own ability to achieve an outcome fosters con�idence among followers, gains respect and admiration, and creates motivation and commitment among followers for the mission at hand.
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 73/217
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 74/217
Arthur Bandura, “Self-ef�icacy,” in V. S. Ramachaudran, ed., Encyclopedia of Human Behavior , vol. 4 (New York: Academic Press, 1994), pp. 71–81; and Elizabeth A. McDaniel and Holly DiBella-McCarthy, “Re�lective Leaders Become Causal Agents of Change,” Journal of Management Development 31, no. 7 (2012), pp. 663–671.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can develop the personal traits of self-con�idence, integrity, and drive, which are important for successful leadership in every organization and situation. You can work to keep an optimistic attitude and be ethical in your decisions and actions.
Active leaders need self-con�idence and optimism. How many of us willingly follow someone who is jaded and pessimistic, or someone who obviously doesn't believe in himself or herself? Leaders initiate change, and they often must make decisions without adequate information. Without the con�idence to move forward and believe things will be okay, even if an occasional decision is wrong, leaders could be paralyzed into inaction. Setbacks have to be overcome. Risks have to be taken. Competing points of view have to be managed, with some people left unsatis�ied. The characteristics of optimism and self-con�idence enable a leader to face all these challenges. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#LQJFHC5SWKGAPA17R969)
Shelley A. Kirkpatrick and Edwin A. Locke, “Leadership: Do Traits Matter?” Academy of Management Executive 5, no. 2 (1991), pp. 48–60.
2-1b. Honesty and Integrity
Positive attitudes have to be tempered by strong ethics or leaders can get into trouble. Consider Bernard Madoff, who masterminded the largest �inancial fraud in history and was sent to jail on 11 criminal charges, including securities fraud and perjury. As a leader, Madoff displayed strong self-con�idence and optimism, which is one reason he was able to attract so many investors. The problem was that he didn't have a strong ethical grounding to match. Due to Madoff's scam, thousands of people were swindled out of their life's savings, charities and foundations were ruined, and pension funds were wiped out, while Madoff and his wife lived in luxury. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#YPHP0V15SJUYGUFE7796)
Larry Neumeister and Tom Hays, “Madoff Sent to Jail as Furious Victims Applaud,” The Huf�ington Post (March 12, 2009), http://www.huf�ingtonpost.com/2009/03/12/madoff-arrives-in-court-f_n_174194.html (accessed May 30, 2013); and Julie Creswell and Landon Thomas Jr., “The Talented Mr. Madoff,” The New York Times (January 25, 2009), p. BU1.
Effective leaders are ethical leaders. One aspect of being an ethical leader is being honest with followers, customers, shareholders, and the public, and maintaining one's integrity. Honesty refers to truthfulness and nondeception. It implies an openness that followers welcome. Integrity means that a leader's character is whole, integrated, and grounded in solid ethical principles, and he or she acts in keeping with those principles. Leaders who model their ethical convictions through their daily actions command admiration, respect, and loyalty. Honesty and integrity are the foundation of trust between leaders and followers.
assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
self-con�idence assurance in one's own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
Honesty
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 75/217
truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 76/217
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 77/217
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 78/217
Sadly, trust is sorely lacking in many organizations following years of corporate scandals and rampant greed. Leaders need the traits of honesty and integrity to rebuild trusting and productive relationships. People today are wary of authority and the deceptive use of power, and they are hungry for leaders who hold high moral standards. Successful leaders have also been found to be highly consistent, doing exactly what they say they will do when they say they will do it. Successful leaders prove themselves trustworthy. They adhere to basic ethical principles and consistently apply them in their leadership. One survey of 1,500 managers asked the values most desired in leaders. Honesty and integrity topped the list. The authors concluded:
Honesty is absolutely essential to leadership. After all, if we are willing to follow someone, whether it be into battle or into the boardroom, we �irst want to assure ourselves that the person is worthy of our trust. We want to know that he or she is being truthful, ethical, and principled. We want to be fully con�ident in the integrity of our leaders. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#YVTXZSEYXUYLZ2D53427)
James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner, Credibility: How Leaders Gain and Lose It, Why People Demand It (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993), p. 14.
2-1c. Drive
Another characteristic considered essential for effective leadership is drive. Leaders often are responsible for initiating new projects as well as guiding projects to successful completion. Drive refers to high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader. Leaders with drive seek achievement, have energy and tenacity, and are often perceived as ambitious. If people don't strive to achieve something, they rarely do. Ambition can enable leaders to set challenging goals and take initiative to reach them. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#XSAANG5QALQTGHUFL870)
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Honesty truthfulness and nondeception
Integrity the quality of being whole and integrated and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 79/217
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 80/217
Kirkpatrick and Locke, “Leadership: Do Traits Matter? ”
A strong drive is also associated with high energy. Leaders work long hours over many years. They have stamina and are vigorous and full of life in order to handle the pace, the demands, and the challenges of leadership. During her �irst two years at Google, Marissa Mayer says she worked 100 hours a week. That pace likely didn't slow in her job at Yahoo.
In the Lead Marissa Mayer, Yahoo
Marissa Mayer set herself some tough goals as the new president and CEO of Yahoo, but being tough is part of Mayer's DNA. Mayer is known for being incredibly energetic and ambitious. She loves hard work and challenge. “She doesn't need any sleep,” said Craig Silverstein, who worked with her at Google and now develops software for Kahn Academy. That's clearly an overstatement, but Mayer has demonstrated that she has almost superhuman stamina and a strong drive to succeed. In the early years at Google, she routinely worked 100-hour weeks and occasionally pulled all-nighters. Soon after joining Yahoo as CEO, Mayer had her �irst baby and returned to work two weeks after the delivery.
Even in high school, Mayer was known as an overachiever who refused to settle for less than the best from herself or others. As captain of the pom-pom squad, she scheduled practices that lasted for hours to make sure everyone was synchronized. It was during her �irst management job at Google that she incorporated the idea of pushing beyond her comfort zone into her career philosophy. She isn't afraid to take risks in the interest of helping the team and organization succeed. Mayer created a �irestorm of criticism when she issued a policy early in her tenure at Yahoo that employees can no longer work from home, but she stuck by her decision without regrets or apologies. She believes Yahoo is in a crisis situation and to succeed needs the creative energy that comes from people working face to face and side by side. Some people believe she will eventually relax the tough “all hands in the of�ice” policy, since �lexibility is another of her characteristics. However, she won't relax her high standards or the requirement that employees be as dedicated to Yahoo's success as she is. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#KWYXCEL4KQUDY3Q3D339)
Patricia Sellers, “Marissa Mayer: Ready to Rumble at Yahoo,” Fortune (October 29, 2012),pp. 118–128; and Julianne Pepitone, “Marissa Mayer: Yahoos Can No Longer Work from Home,” CNN Money (February 25, 2013), http://money.cnn.com/2013/02/25/technology/yahoo-work-from-home/index.html (accessed March 11, 2013).
Working 100-hour weeks certainly isn't necessary for effective leadership, but all leaders have to display drive and energy to be successful. Clearly, various traits such as drive, self-con�idence, optimism, and honesty have great value for leaders. One study of 600 executives by Hay Group, a global organizational and human resources consulting �irm, found that 75 percent of the successful executives studied possessed the characteristics of self-con�idence and drive. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#JFTY0XX2GM9GF70MX055)
“Towards a More Perfect Match: Building Successful Leaders by Effectively Aligning People and Roles,” Hay Group Working Paper (2004); and “Making Sure the Suit Fits,” Hay Group Research Brief (2004). Both available from 116 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02116 : Hay Group, The McClelland Center,, or at http://www.haygroup.com.
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
Drive high motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 81/217
In Chapter 4 , we will further consider individual characteristics and qualities that play a role in leadership effectiveness. However, good leaders know it isn't about identifying speci�ic individual traits but rather understanding one's own unique set of strengths and capabilities and learning how to make the most of them. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/tqceav8zpzx03s96x890#KDZDSE4JEZP5RA6GN170)
The following is based on Marcus Buckingham and Donald O. Clifton, Now, Discover Your Strengths (New York: The Free Press, 2001); and Chuck Martin with Peg Dawson and Richard Guare, Smarts: Are We Hardwired for Success? (New York: AMACOM, 2007).
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 82/217
2-2. Know Your Strengths Some people tend to think a leader should have a complete set of skills, characteristics, and abilities to handle any problem, challenge, or opportunity that comes along. This myth of the “complete leader” can cause stress and frustration for leaders and followers, as well as damage to the organization. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/swtbf7c0f18u8x6jg513#CJBBLEHVAXZNZEA8Z028) Interdependence is the key to effective leadership. Sixty percent of leaders in one survey acknowledge that leaders face challenges that go beyond any individual's capabilities. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/swtbf7c0f18u8x6jg513#XPCU46JTCS2MAA77F612) Therefore, the best leaders recognize and hone their strengths while trusting and collaborating with others to make up for their weak points.
Deborah Ancona, Thomas W. Malone, Wanda J. Orlikowski, and Peter M. Senge, “In Praise of the Incomplete Leader,” Harvard Business Review (February 2007), pp. 92– 100.
Center for Creative Leadership survey results, reported in “The Demise of the Heroic Leader,” Leader to Leader (Fall 2006), pp. 55–56.
Everyone has strengths, but many leaders fail to recognize and apply them, often because they are hampered by the idea that they should be good at everything. Benjamin Franklin referred to wasted strengths as “sundials in the shade.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/swtbf7c0f18u8x6jg513#NPZJ5PWBG61GWDV0E309) Only when leaders understand their strengths can they use these abilities effectively to make their best contribution.
Buckingham and Clifton, Now, Discover Your Strengths , p. 12.
2-2a. What Are Strengths?
A strength arises from a natural talent that has been supported and reinforced with knowledge and skills. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/swtbf7c0f18u8x6jg513#WRJYWZDFN21FMJ9DW522) Talents can be thought of as innate traits and naturally recurring patterns of thought, feeling, and behavior. One person might be naturally outgoing and curious, for example; another might have a natural talent for being organized. Once recognized, talents can be turned into strengths by consciously developing and enhancing them with learning and practice. Unless they are honed and strengthened and put to use, talents are merely aspects of one's potential.
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 83/217
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 84/217
Buckingham and Clifton, Now, Discover Your Strengths , p. 12.
One neat thing about understanding your strengths is the philosophy “concentrate on your strengths, not your weaknesses.” You excel in life by maximizing your strengths, not by �ixing your weaknesses. When you live and work from your strengths, you are more motivated, competent, and satis�ied. Strengths are important because you can focus your life around them, and your energy, enthusiasm, and effectiveness can be the basis of your leadership. Why devote your energy to trying to �ix your weaknesses or expend much thought and effort performing tasks that don't match your strengths? When people use their talents and strengths, they feel good and enjoy their work without extra effort; hence they are effective and make a positive contribution.
How does a leader know which traits or behavior patterns can be turned into strengths? Warren Buffett recommends that people do what �its their natural interests and abilities, which is re�lected in the work they like to do. Buffett says he �inds investing so much fun that he would do it for free. Buffett tried other work early in his career but found it so unsatisfying that he knew he wouldn't want to do it for any amount of money. The legendary self-made billionaire and chairman of Berkshire Hathaway was the third richest person in the world in 2015. Yet it isn't the money that drives him, but the love of the work. His career advice is to �ind work or a career that you really enjoy, and it will �it the natural strengths of your mental wiring. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/swtbf7c0f18u8x6jg513#ULNWW4Z43WKQCX7U4106)
Bill George, “The Master Gives It Back,” segment in “Special Report: America's Best Leaders,” U.S. News and World Report (October 30, 2006), pp. 50–87; and Richard L. Daft, The Executive and the Elephant: A Leader's Guide to Building Inner Excellence (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010), p. 149.
2-2b. Matching Strengths with Roles
Recent research suggests that different leader strengths might be better suited to different types of leadership roles. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/swtbf7c0f18u8x6jg513#ZUFYDHUQXJ7CC2QHD019) Exhibit 2.2 illustrates three types of leadership roles identi�ied in today's organizations by a team of experts at Hay Group. The researchers found that, although there is a core set of competencies that all leaders need, there is signi�icant variation in the personal characteristics, behaviors, and skills that correlate with success in the different roles.
This discussion is based on Ron Garonzik, Geoff Nethersell, and Scott Spreier, “Navigating through the New Leadership Landscape,” Leader to Leader (Winter 2006), pp. 30–39; “Towards a More Perfect Match: Building Successful Leaders by Effectively Aligning People and Roles,” Hay Group Working Paper (2004); and “Making Sure the ‘Suit’ Fits,” Hay Group Research Brief (2004). Available from 116 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02116: Hay Group, The McClelland Center, or at http://www.haygroup.com.
Exhibit 2.2. Three Types of Leadership Roles
The operational role is the closest to a traditional, vertically oriented management role, where an executive has direct control over people and resources to accomplish results. Operational leaders �ill traditional line and general management positions in a business, for example. They set goals, establish plans, and get things done primarily through the vertical hierarchy and the use of position power. Operational leaders are doggedly focused on delivering results. They need high self-con�idence and tend to be assertive, always pushing forward and raising the bar. Successful operational leaders are typically analytical and knowledgeable, yet they also have the ability to translate their knowledge into a vision that others can become passionate about.
strength a natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 85/217
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 86/217
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can understand the type of leadership role in which your strengths would be most effective and satisfying. You can pursue an operational, collaborative, or advisory leadership role depending on your natural tendencies.
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
operational role a vertically oriented leadership role in which an executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to accomplish results
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 87/217
The collaborative role is a horizontal role and includes people such as project managers, matrix managers, and team leaders in today's more horizontally organized companies. This role, which has grown tremendously in importance in recent years, is quite challenging. Leaders in collaborative roles typically don't have the strong position power of the operational role. They often work behind the scenes, using their personal power to in�luence others and get things done. Collaborative leaders need excellent people skills in order to network, build relationships, and obtain agreement through personal in�luence. They also are highly proactive and tenacious, and they exhibit extreme �lexibility to cope with the ambiguity and uncertainty associated with the collaborative role.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 88/217
a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
collaborative role
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 89/217
Leaders in an advisory role provide guidance and support to other people and departments in the organization. Advisory leadership roles are found, for example, in departments such as legal, �inance, and human resources. These leaders are responsible for developing broad organizational capabilities rather than accomplishing speci�ic business results. Advisory leaders need great people skills and the ability to in�luence others through communication, knowledge, and personal persuasion. In addition, leaders in advisory roles need exceptionally high levels of honesty and integrity to build trust and keep the organization on solid ethical ground.
a horizontal leadership role (such as team leader) in which the leader often works behind the scenes and uses personal power to in�luence others and get things done.
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 90/217
The Hay Group research �indings shed new light on the types of roles leaders �ill in today's organizations and emphasize that an individual's strengths can in�luence how effective a leader might be in a particular role. Leadership success partly depends on matching leaders with roles where their strengths can be most effective.
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
advisory role a leadership role that provides advice, guidance, and support to other people and departments in the organization
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 91/217
2-3. Behavior Approaches As suggested in the previous discussion, strengths are not just personal traits but also patterns of behavior. Rather than looking at an individual's personal traits, diverse research programs on leadership behavior have sought to uncover the behaviors that effective leaders engage in. Behaviors can be learned more readily than traits, enabling leadership to be accessible to all.
2-3a. Autocratic versus Democratic Behaviors
One study that served as a precursor to the behavior approach recognized autocratic and democratic leadership styles. An autocratic leader is one who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion. A democratic leader delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence.
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 92/217
a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 93/217
a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 94/217
The �irst studies on these leadership behaviors were conducted at the University of Iowa by Kurt Lewin and his associates. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#YDSWQP40NHG3958NU965) The research included groups of children, each with its own designated adult leader who was instructed to act in either an autocratic or a democratic style. These experiments produced some interesting �indings. The groups with autocratic leaders performed highly so long as the leader was present to supervise them. However, group members were displeased with the close, autocratic style of leadership, and feelings of hostility frequently arose. The performance of groups who were assigned democratic leaders was almost as good, and these groups were characterized by positive feelings rather than hostility. In addition, under the democratic style of leadership, group members performed well even when the leader was absent. The participative techniques and majority-rule decision making used by the democratic leader trained and involved the group members so that they performed well with or without the leader present. These characteristics of democratic leadership may partly explain why the empowerment of employees is a popular trend in companies today. This chapter's Consider This box presents the notion that democratic leaders may get better results because they allow followers to feel their own power and worth.
K. Lewin, “Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods,” American Journal of Sociology 44 (1939), pp. 868–896; K. Lewin and R. Lippett, “An Experimental Approach to the Study of Autocracy and Democracy: A Preliminary Note,” Sociometry 1 (1938), pp. 292–300; and K. Lewin, R. Lippett, and R. K. White, “Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created Social Climates,” Journal of Social Psychology 10 (1939), pp. 271–301.
Consider This! Minimal Leadership
When the Master governs, the people are hardly aware that he [she] exists.
Next best is a leader who is loved.
Next, one who is feared.
The worst is one who is despised.
If you don't trust the people, you make them untrustworthy.
The Master doesn't talk, he [she] acts.
a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
autocratic a leader who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
democratic a leader who delegates authority to others, encourages participation, relies on subordinates' knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate respect for in�luence
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 95/217
When his [her] work is done, the people say, “Amazing: we did it all by ourselves.”
Source: From Tao Te Ching , translated by S. Mitchell, (New York: Harper Perennial, 1988), p. 17.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can use a democratic leadership style to help followers develop decision-making skills and perform well without close supervision. An autocratic style might be appropriate when there is time pressure or followers have low skill levels.
This early work implied that leaders were either autocratic or democratic in their approach. However, further work by Tannenbaum and Schmidt indicated that leadership behavior could exist on a continuum re�lecting different amounts of employee participation. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#VFMDVPK0VV9V1S8JU028) Thus, one leader might be autocratic (boss-centered), another democratic (subordinate-centered), and a third a mix of the two styles. Exhibit 2.3 illustrates the leadership continuum.
R. Tannenbaum and W. H. Schmidt, “How to Choose a Leadership Pattern,” Harvard Business Review 36 (1958), pp. 95–101.
Exhibit 2.3. Leadership Continuum
Source: Harvard Business Review. An exhibit from Robert Tannenbaum and Warren Schmidt, “How to Choose a Leadership Pattern” (May–June 1973). Copyright 1973 by the president and Fellows of Harvard College.
Tannenbaum and Schmidt also suggested that the extent to which leaders should be boss-centered or subordinate-centered depended on organizational circumstances and that leaders might adjust their behaviors to �it the circumstances. For example, if there is time pressure on a leader, or if it takes too long for subordinates to learn how to make decisions, the leader will tend to use an autocratic style. When subordinates are able to learn decision-making skills readily, a democratic style can be used. Also, the greater the skill difference, the more autocratic the leader approach because it is dif�icult to bring subordinates up to the leader's expertise level. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#SZLDVL8VAQF2CLJJ2120)
F. A. Heller and G. A. Yukl, “Participation, Managerial Decision-Making and Situational Variables,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 4 (1969), pp. 227–241.
Jack Hartnett, former president of D. L. Rogers Corporation and franchise owner of 54 Sonic drive-in restaurants, provides an example of the autocratic leadership style. He tells workers to “do it the way we tell you to do it,” rather than asking for their input or suggestions. *
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 96/217
(http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#BJKA9V7J0J28S30TJ065) The style works well in the fast-food restaurant business where turnover is typically high and many employees are young and low skilled. In contrast, Warren Buffett, introduced earlier, is an excellent example of a democratic leader.
“Jack's Recipe (Management Principles Used by Jack Hartnett, President of D. L. Rogers Corp.),” sidebar in Marc Ballon, “Extreme Managing: Equal Parts Old-Fashioned Dictator and New Age Father Figure, Jack Hartnett Breaks Nearly Every Rule of the Enlightened Manager's Code,” Inc. (July 1998), p. 60.
In the Lead Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway
He is one of the richest people in the world, but Warren Buffett is also considered one of the warmest, most humble, and most approachable. Each year, Buffett hosts in his hometown of Omaha, Nebraska, about 160 business students from universities around the world, answering questions and listening to their ideas.
Within the numerous companies under his leadership, Buffett also emphasizes communication, mutual trust, respect, and a nurturing work environment. He places a high value on interacting and collaborating with employees at all levels. He lets the managers of the various companies run their own show, believing they are the ones who best know how to do it. Buffett's democratic leadership style is re�lected in an excerpt from a memo he sent to top managers: “Talk to me about what is going on as little or as much as you wish. Each of you does a �irst-class job of running your operation with your own individual style and you don't need me to help.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#XYRQR8WCWBY03U6L1783)
Eileen Newman Rubin, “Assessing Your Leadership Style to Achieve Organizational Objectives,” Global Business and Organizational Excellence (September– October 2013), pp. 55–66; Bill George, “The Master Gives It Back,” segment in “Special Report: America's Best Leaders,” U.S. News and World Report (October 30, 2006), pp. 50–87; and Richard L. Daft, The Executive and the Elephant: A Leader's Guide to Building Inner Excellence (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010), p. 149.
The �indings about autocratic and democratic leadership in the original University of Iowa studies indicated that leadership behavior had a de�inite effect on outcomes such as follower performance and satisfaction. Equally important was the recognition that effective leadership was re�lected in behavior, not simply by what personality traits a leader possessed. For example, Stephen McDonnell, founder and CEO of Applegate Farms, believes the best way to get a company running smoothly is to give everyone access to relevant information, empower them with the freedom and responsibility to act on it, and then stay out of the way. McDonnell doesn't even go into the of�ice most days, although he is a self-confessed control-freak boss, full of anxiety and obsessed with meeting goals. He realized that working mostly from home was the best way to protect the company from his tendency to micromanage. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#CNWKSV0YTVVT9CEGL719) This suggests that leaders can adopt behaviors that are almost in direct opposition to their natural traits when it is necessary.
Donna Fenn, “The Remote Control CEO,” Inc. (October 2005), pp. 96–101, 144–146.
2-3b. Ohio State Studies
New Leader Action Memo
Discover your leadership orientation related to consideration and initiating structure by completing the self-assessment exercise in Leader's Self-Insight 2.2 .
The idea that leadership is re�lected in behavior and not just personal traits provided a focus for subsequent research. One early series of studies on leadership behavior was conducted at The Ohio State University. Researchers conducted surveys to identify speci�ic dimensions of leader behavior. Narrowing a list of nearly 2,000 leader behaviors into a questionnaire containing 150 examples of de�initive leader behaviors, they developed the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) and administered it to employees. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#LEFSG1X7KE9KNBJAZ863) Hundreds of
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 97/217
employees responded to various examples according to the degree to which their leaders engaged in the behaviors. The analysis of ratings resulted in two wide-ranging categories of leader behavior, later called consideration and initiating structure .
J. K. Hemphill and A. E. Coons, “Development of the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire,” in R. M. Stogdill and A. E. Coons, eds., Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement (Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research, 1957).
Leader's Self-Insight 2.2. What's Your Leadership Orientation?
Instructions : The following questions ask about your personal leadership orientation. Each item describes a speci�ic kind of behavior but does not ask you to judge whether the behavior is desirable or undesirable.
Read each item carefully. Think about how often you engage in the behavior described by the item in a work or school group. Please indicate whether each statement is Mostly False or Mostly True by checking the answer that best describes your behavior.
Mostly False Mostly True 1. I put into operation suggestions agreed to by the group. 2. I treat everyone in the group with respect as my equal. 3. I back up what other people in the group do. 4. I help others with their personal problems. 5. I bring up how much work should be accomplished. 6. I help assign people to speci�ic tasks. 7. I frequently suggest ways to �ix problems. 8. I emphasize deadlines and how to meet them.
Scoring and Interpretation
Consideration behavior score—count the number of checks for Mostly True for items 1–4. Enter your consideration score here: .
A higher score (3 or 4) suggests a relatively strong orientation toward consideration behavior by you as a leader. A low score (2 or less) suggests a relatively weak consideration orientation.
Initiating structure behavior score—count the number of checks for Mostly True for items 5–8. Enter your initiating structure score here: .
A higher score (3 or 4) suggests a relatively strong orientation toward initiating structure behavior by you as a leader. A low score (2 or less) suggests a relatively weak orientation toward initiating structure behavior.
Source: Sample items adapted from: Edwin A Fleishman 's Leadership Opinion Questionnaire . (Copyright 1960, Science Research Associates, Inc., Chicago, IL). This version is based on Jon L. Pierce and John W. Newstrom, Leaders and the Leadership Process: Readings, Self-Assessments & Applications , 2nd ed. (Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 2000).
Consideration describes the extent to which a leader cares about subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust. Showing appreciation, listening carefully to problems, and seeking input from subordinates regarding important decisions are all examples of consideration behaviors.
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 98/217
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86mm… 99/217
Initiating structure describes the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement. This type of leader behavior includes directing tasks, getting people to work hard, planning, providing explicit schedules for work activities, and ruling with an iron hand.
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Consideration the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 100/217
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 101/217
Although many leaders fall along a continuum that includes both consideration and initiating structure behaviors, these behavior categories are independent of one another. In other words, a leader can display a high degree of both behavior types or a low degree of both behavior types. Additionally, a leader might demonstrate high consideration and low initiating structure, or low consideration and high initiating structure behavior. Research indicates that all four of these leader style combinations can be effective. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#LWFC2CM474LKULURM338) The following examples describe two U.S. Marine leaders who display different types of leadership behavior that correlate to the consideration and initiating structure styles. Sometimes these styles clash.
P. C. Nystrom, “Managers and the High-High Leader Myth,” Academy of Management Journal 21 (1978), pp. 325–331; and L. L. Larson, J. G. Hunt, and Richard N. Osborn, “The Great High-High Leader Behavior Myth: A Lesson from Occam's Razor,” Academy of Management Journal 19 (1976), pp. 628–641.
In the Lead Col. Joe D. Dowdy and Maj. Gen. James Mattis, U.S. Marine Corps
Only a few weeks into the war in Iraq, Marine Col. Joe D. Dowdy had both accomplished a grueling military mission and been removed from his command by Maj. Gen. James Mattis. The complicated and con�licting tales of why Col. Dowdy was dismissed are beyond the scope of this text, but one issue that came under examination was the differing styles of Col. Dowdy and Gen. Mattis, as well as the dif�icult, age-old wartime tension of “men versus mission.”
Gen. Mattis has been referred to as a “warrior monk,” consumed with the study of battle tactics and a leader whose own battle plans in Iraq were considered brilliant. Gen. Mattis saw speed as integral to success in the early days of the Iraqi war, pushing for regiments to move quickly to accomplish a mission despite signi�icant risks. For Col. Dowdy, some risks seemed too high, and he made decisions that delayed his mission but better protected his marines. Col. Dowdy was beloved by his followers because he was deeply concerned about their welfare, paid attention to them as individuals, and treated them as equals, going so far as to decline certain privileges that were available only to of�icers.
Despite their different styles, both leaders were highly respected by followers. When asked about Gen. Mattis, Gunnery Sgt. Robert Kane, who has served under both leaders, says he would certainly “follow him again.” However, when he learned that Col. Dowdy had been dismissed, Sgt. Kane says he “wanted to go with him. If [he] had said ‘Get your gear, you're coming with me,’ I would've gone, even if it meant the end of my career.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#HXNQU3DJ3TH2V5KGF706)
Christopher Cooper, “Speed Trap: How a Marine Lost His Command in Race to Baghdad,” The Wall Street Journal (April 5, 2004), pp. A1, A15.
Gen. Mattis might be considered highly task oriented, re�lecting an initiating structure approach, while Col. Dowdy seems more people oriented, re�lecting a consideration behavioral style. Whereas Gen. Mattis typically put the mission �irst, combined with a concern for the marines under his command, Col. Dowdy typically put marines �irst, even though he also gave his all to accomplish the mission.
Additional studies that correlated these two leader behavior types and impact on subordinates initially demonstrated that “considerate” supervisors had a more positive impact on subordinate satisfaction than did “structuring” supervisors. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#BDKNU4TV8T3GDSR7D470) For example, when leader effectiveness was de�ined by voluntary turnover or amount of grievances �iled by subordinates, considerate leaders generated less turnover and fewer grievances. But research that utilized performance criteria, such as group output and productivity, showed initiating structure behavior was rated more effective. Other studies involving aircraft commanders and
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
Initiating structure the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates' work activities toward goal achievement
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 102/217
university department heads revealed that leaders rated effective by subordinates exhibited a high level of both consideration and initiating structure behaviors, whereas leaders rated less effective displayed low levels of both behavior styles. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#TGKR9C40BZX0G19YA193)
E. W. Skinner, “Relationships between Leadership Behavior Patterns and Organizational-Situational Variables,” Personnel Psychology 22 (1969), pp. 489–494; E. A. Fleishman and E. F. Harris, “Patterns of Leadership Behavior Related to Employee Grievances and Turnover,” Personnel Psychology 15 (1962), pp. 43–56; and Ronald F. Piccolo, Joyce E. Bono, Kathrin Heinitz, Jens Rowold, Emily Duehr, and Timothy A. Judge, “The Relative Impact of Complementary Leader Behaviors: Which Matter Most?” The Leadership Quaterly 23 (2012), pp. 567–581.
A. W. Halpin and B. J. Winer, “A Factorial Study of the Leader Behavior Descriptions,” in R. M. Stogdill and A. E. Coons, eds., Leader Behavior: Its Descriptions and Measurement (Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research, 1957); and J. K. Hemphill, “Leadership Behavior Associated with the Administrative Reputations of College Departments,” Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1955), pp. 385–401.
2-3c. University of Michigan Studies
Studies at the University of Michigan took a different approach by directly comparing the behavior of effective and ineffective supervisors. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#KVJLNCE35SDNLMWA7326) The effectiveness of leaders was determined by productivity of the subordinate group. Initial �ield studies and interviews at various job sites gave way to a questionnaire not unlike the LBDQ, called the Survey of Organizations. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#FCNHZ9CH50NEAN553560)
R. Likert, “From Production- and Employee-Centeredness to Systems 1–4,” Journal of Management 5 (1979), pp. 147–156.
J. Taylor and D. Bowers, The Survey of Organizations: A Machine Scored Standardized Questionnaire Instrument (Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1972).
Over time, the Michigan researchers established two types of leadership behavior, each type consisting of two dimensions. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#LDWU1T8NSSG9GTRBJ652) First, employee-centered leaders display a focus on the human needs of their subordinates. Leader support and interaction facilitation are the two underlying dimensions of employee-centered behavior. This means that in addition to demonstrating support for their subordinates, employee-centered leaders facilitate positive interaction among followers and seek to minimize con�lict. The employee-centered style of leadership roughly corresponds to the Ohio State concept of consideration.
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 103/217
D. G. Bowers and S. E. Seashore, “Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with a Four-Factor Theory of Leadership,” Administrative Science Quarterly 11 (1966), pp. 238– 263.
a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
employee-centered a leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 104/217
In contrast to the employee-centered leader, the job-centered leader directs activities toward scheduling, accomplishing tasks, and achieving ef�iciency. Goal emphasis and work facilitation are dimensions of this leadership behavior. By focusing on reaching task goals and facilitating the structure of tasks, job-centered behavior approximates that of initiating structure.
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 105/217
However, unlike the consideration and initiating structure styles de�ined by the Ohio State studies, Michigan researchers considered employee-centered leadership and job-centered leadership to be distinct styles in opposition to one another. A leader is identi�iable by behavior characteristic of one or the other style but not both. Another hallmark of later Michigan studies is the acknowledgment that often the behaviors of goal emphasis, work facilitation, support, and interaction facilitation can be meaningfully performed by a subordinate's peers rather than only by the designated leader. Other people in the group could supply these behaviors, which enhanced performance. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#HQYJV02VFX4NRBV4W923)
D. G. Bowers and S. E. Seashore, “Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with a Four-Factor Theory of Leadership,” Administrative Science Quarterly 11 (1966), pp. 238– 263.
leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
job-centered leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward ef�iciency, cost-cutting, and scheduling, with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 106/217
In addition, while leadership behavior was demonstrated to affect the performance and satisfaction of subordinates, performance was also in�luenced by other factors related to the situation within which leaders and subordinates worked. The importance of situation will be explored in the next chapter.
2-3d. The Leadership Grid
Blake and Mouton of the University of Texas proposed a two-dimensional leadership theory called the Leadership Grid that builds on the work of the Ohio State and Michigan studies. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#ZNSCDT6T380VE2HRV603) Based on a week-long seminar, researchers rated leaders on a scale of one to nine according to two criteria: the concern for people and the concern for production. The scores for these criteria are plotted on a grid with an axis corresponding to each concern. Exhibit 2.4 depicts the two-dimensional model and �ive of the seven major leadership styles.
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 107/217
Robert Blake and Jane S. Mouton, The Managerial Grid III (Houston: Gulf Publishing Company, 1985).
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
Leadership Grid a two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 108/217
Exhibit 2.4. The Leadership Grid ® Figure
Source: The Leadership Grid �igure from Leadership Dilemma—Grid Solutions by Robert R. Blake and Anne Adams McCanse (formerly the Managerial Grid by Robert R. Blake and Jane S. Mouton). Houston: Gulf Publishing Company, p. 29. Copyright 1991 by Scienti�ic Methods, Inc. Reproduced by permission of the owners.
Team management (9,9) is often considered the most effective style and is recommended because organization members work together to accomplish tasks. Country club management (1,9) occurs when primary emphasis is given to people rather than to work outputs. Authority-compliance management (9,1) occurs when ef�iciency in operations is the dominant orientation. Middle-of-the-road management (5,5) re�lects a moderate amount of concern for both people and production. Impoverished management (1,1) means the absence of a leadership philosophy; leaders exert little effort toward interpersonal relationships or work accomplishment. Consider these examples:
In the Lead Denise Morrison, Campbell Soup Company, and Michael Arrington, TechCrunch
Douglas Conant, former CEO of Campbell Soup Company, met Denise Morrison in 1995 when he was CEO of Nabisco and she cold-called him looking for a job. He found in Morrison a kindred spirit in terms of leadership style and hired her; she later followed him to Campbell in 2003—and into the company's top executive seat eight years later. Like Conant, Morrison is a strong proponent of empowerment and employee engagement. She has been referred to as “tough on the issues but tender on people.” Morrison is known to be patient and supportive, even though she can make dif�icult operational decisions without letting her emotions cloud her judgment.
Compare Morrison's approach to that of Michael Arrington, founder of TechCrunch, the company that publishes the in�luential blog of the same name. Arrington started the blog because he enjoys the research and writing, and he admits he isn't very good at the “people management” part of his job. “It's hard to be a coach and a player at the same time,” Arrington says. “Plus, I'm moody.” Arrington says his style is to bust down doors and clean up the mess later. Recognizing his weak point in being a manager of people, Arrington hired Heather Harde as CEO of the company, which enabled TechCrunch to grow and allowed Arrington to focus on what he was best at doing. Both Arrington and Harde have since left the company after public clashes with Arianna Huf�ington of The Huf�ington Post . * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#UEKLJMBB934ZNL2PR757)
Diane Brady and Matthew Boyle, “Campbell's Recipe for a CEO Yields Denise Morrison,” Business Week (June 23, 2011), http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_27/b4235060614059.htm (accessed March 12, 2013); Michael Arrington, “The Way I Work: My Style Is to Bust the Door Down and Clean the Mess Up Later,” Inc. (October 2010), pp. 124–128; and Jeff Bercovici, “TechCrunch CEO Reported Out after Clashing with
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 109/217
HuffPost-ers,” Forbes (November 17, 2011), http://www.forbes.com/sites/jef�bercovici/2011/11/17/techcrunch-ceo-reported-out-after-clashing-with- huffpost-ers/ (accessed March 13, 2013).
The leadership of Denise Morrison is characterized by high concern for people and moderate concern for tasks and production. Michael Arrington, in contrast, is very high on concern for production and relatively low on concern for people. In each case, both concerns shown in The Leadership Grid are present, but they are integrated in different amounts.
2-3e. Theories of a “High-High” Leader
The leadership styles described by the researchers at Ohio State, University of Michigan, and University of Texas pertain to variables that roughly correspond to one another: consideration and initiating structure; employee-centered and job-centered; concern for people and concern for production. The research into the behavior approach culminated in two predominate types of leadership behaviors—people-oriented and task-oriented. Exhibit 2.5 illustrates how the various studies fall within these two behavior categories and lists some behaviors that are representative of each type of leadership.
Exhibit 2.5. Themes of Leader Behavior Research
Sources: Based on Marilyn R. Zuckerman and Lewis J. Hatala, Incredibly American: Releasing the Heart of Quality (Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality, 1992), pp. 141–142; and Mark O'Connell, Gary Yukl, and Thomas Taber, “Leader Behavior and LMX: A Constructive Replication,” Journal of Managerial Psychology 27, no. 2 (2012), pp. 143–154.
The �indings about two underlying dimensions and the possibility of leaders rated high on both dimensions raise three questions to think about. The �irst question is whether these two dimensions are the most important behaviors of leadership. Certainly, these two behaviors are important. They capture fundamental, underlying aspects of human behavior that must be considered for organizations to succeed. One reason why these two dimensions are compelling is that the �indings are based on empirical research, which means that researchers went into the �ield to study real leaders across a variety of settings. When independent streams of �ield research reach similar conclusions, they probably represent a fundamental theme in leadership behavior. A review of 50 years of leadership research, for example, identi�ied task-oriented behavior and people-oriented behavior as primary categories related to effective leadership in numerous studies. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#PKBNH6BGD5GV0RE1K858) Concern for tasks and concern for people must be shown toward followers at some reasonable level, either by the leader or by other people in the system. Although these are not the only important behaviors, as we will see throughout this book, they certainly require attention.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 110/217
Gary Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior: What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26 (November 2012), pp. 66– 80; and Gary Yukl, Angela Gordon, and Tom Taber, “A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Leadership Behavior: Integrating a Half Century of Behavior Research,” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 9, no. 1 (2002), pp. 15–32.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can succeed in a variety of situations by showing concern for both tasks and people. People-oriented behavior is related to higher follower satisfaction, and task-oriented behavior is typically associated with higher productivity.
The second question is whether people orientation and task orientation exist together in the same leader, and how. The grid theory argues that yes, both are present when people work with or through others to accomplish an activity. Although leaders may be high on either style, there is considerable belief that the best leaders are high on both behaviors. Eddy Cue, senior vice president of Internet Software and Services at Apple and one of CEO Tim Cook's trusted advisers, provides an example of a leader who succeeds on both dimensions. Cue is known as a master strategist and tactician who focuses people on key goals for new product launches, establishes plans to reach targets, and may even step in to handle tasks himself to get things done on time. Yet employees also appreciate his softer, people-oriented side. When the development of the iCloud service wasn't going well, Cue stayed calm and told employees he had con�idence in them. He's respected for being easygoing and friendly and for being willing to make himself vulnerable with employees by openly admitting mistakes. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/rnrad0y85gfcp7mqv591#HCBRLL9NN1ADEBR5E458)
Jessica E. Lessin, “Eddy Cue: Apple's Rising Mr. Fix-It,” The Wall Street Journal (November 28, 2012), p. B1.
The third question concerns whether people can actually change themselves into leaders high on people or task orientation. In the 1950s and 1960s, when the Ohio State and Michigan studies were underway, the assumption of researchers was that the behaviors of effective leaders could be emulated by anyone wishing to become an effective leader. In general it seems that people can indeed learn new leader behaviors. Although “high-high” leadership is not the only effective style, researchers have looked to this kind of leader as a candidate for success in a wide variety of situations. However, as we will see in Chapter 3 , the next generation of leadership studies re�ined the understanding of situations to pinpoint more precisely when each type of leadership behavior is most effective.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 111/217
2-4. Individualized Leadership Traditional trait and behavior theories assume that a leader adopts a general leadership style that is used with all group members. A more recent approach to leadership behavior research, individualized leadership , looks instead at the speci�ic relationship between a leader and each individual follower. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ztth60g8bnprr599t363#ALGLUYUVDGT11DNFT729) Individualized leadership is based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader. In this view, leadership is a series of dyads , or a series of two-person interactions. The dyadic view focuses on the concept of exchange , what each party gives to and receives from the other. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ztth60g8bnprr599t363#RJYZZPRPCRFZXCA7U298)
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 112/217
Francis J. Yammarino and Fred Dansereau, “Individualized Leadership,” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 9, no. 1 (2002), pp. 90–99; Gary Yukl, Mark O'Donnell, and Thomas Taber, “In�luence of Leader Behaviors on the Leader-Member Exchange Relationship,” Journal of Managerial Psychology 24, no. 4 (2009), pp. 289– 299; and M. O'Donnell, G. Yukl, and T. Taber, “Leader Behavior and LMX: A Constructive Replication,” Journal of Management Psychology 27, no. 2 (2012), pp. 143–154.
This discussion is based on Fred Dansereau, “A Dyadic Approach to Leadership: Creating and Nurturing This Approach under Fire,” Leadership Quarterly 6, no. 4 (1995), pp. 479–490; and George B. Graen and Mary Uhl-Bien, “Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Approach,” Leadership Quarterly 6, no. 2 (1995), pp. 219–247.
The �irst individualized leadership theory was introduced nearly 40 years ago and has been steadily revised ever since. Exhibit 2.6 illustrates the development of research in this area. The �irst stage was the awareness of a relationship between a leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
Individualized leadership a theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 113/217
and each individual rather than between a leader and a group of followers. The second stage examined speci�ic attributes of the exchange relationship. The third stage explored whether leaders could intentionally develop partnerships with each group member.
Exhibit 2.6. Stages of Development of Individualized Leadership
Sources: Based on Based on Fred Danereau, “A Dyadic Approach to Leadership: Creating and Nurturing This Approach Under Fire,” Leadership Quarterly 6, no. 4 (1995), pp. 479–490, and George B. Graen and Mary Uhl-Bien, “Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level, Multi-Domain Approach,” Leadership Quarterly 6, no. 2 (1995), pp. 219–247.
2-4a. Vertical Dyad Linkage Model
The vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group. Initial �indings indicated that followers provided very different descriptions of the same leader. For example, some reported a leader, and their relationship with the leader, as having a high degree of mutual trust, respect, and obligation. These high-quality relationships might be characterized as high on both people and task orientation. Other followers reported a low- quality relationship with the same leader, such as having a low degree of trust, respect, and obligation. These followers perceived the leader as being low on important leadership behaviors.
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 114/217
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 115/217
Based on these two extreme behavior patterns, subordinates were found to exist in either an in-group or an out-group in relation to the leader. Exhibit 2.7 delineates the differences in leader behavior toward in-group versus out-group members. A recent survey of 17,000 federal employees found that 28 percent believed their own supervisor had granted advantages to someone based on personal feelings or relationships, and 53 percent believed such favoritism had in�luenced the decisions or actions of other supervisors in their organization. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ztth60g8bnprr599t363#VQRQCMZ51ZQAU55YE281) Most of us who have had experience with any kind of group, whether it be a college class, an athletic team, or a work group, recognize that some leaders may spend a disproportionate amount of time with certain people and that these “insiders” are often highly trusted and may obtain special privileges. In the terminology of the VDL model, these people would be considered to participate in an in-group relationship with the leader, whereas other members of the group who did not experience a sense of trust and extra consideration would participate in an out-group relationship . In-group members, those who rated the leader highly, had developed close relationships with the leader and often became assistants who played key roles in the functioning of the work unit. Out-group members were not key players in the work unit.
Tom Fox, “Do Your Employees Think You Play Favorites? Three Ways to Tell,” The Washington Post (January 30, 2014), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on- leadership/wp/2014/01/30/do-your-employees-think-you-play-favorites-three-ways-to-tell/ (accessed October 9, 2015).
Exhibit 2.7. Leader Behavior toward In-Group versus Out-Group Members
In-Group Subordinates Out-Group Subordinates
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
vertical dyad linkage (VDL) model a model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 116/217
In-Group Subordinates Out-Group Subordinates
Provides support and encouragement when employee faces a dif�icult, stressful task
Discusses objectives; trusts employee to use his or her own approach in solving problems and reaching goals
Listens to employee's suggestions and ideas about how work is done
Treats mistakes as opportunities for coaching and developing employee
Gives employee interesting assignments; may allow employee to choose assignment
Sometimes defers to subordinate's opinion
Praises accomplishments and performance improvements
Shows little consideration if employee is having dif�iculty with a task
Gives the employee speci�ic directives for how to accomplish tasks and attain goals
Shows little interest in employee's comments and suggestions
Criticizes or punishes mistakes
Assigns primarily routine jobs and monitors employee closely
Usually imposes own views
Focuses on areas of poor performance
Sources: Based on Based on Jean François Manzoni and Jean-Louis Barsoux, “The Set-Up-to-Fail Syndrome,” Harvard Business Review (March– April 1988), pp. 110–113; and Mark O'Donnell, Gary Yukl, and Thomas Taber, “Leader Behavior and LMX: A Constructive Replication,” Journal of Management Psychology 27, no. 2 (2012), pp. 143–154.
New Leader Action Memo
Answer the questions in Leader's Self-Insight 2.3 to understand how LMX theory applies to your own work experience.
Thus, by focusing on the relationship between a leader and each individual, the VDL research found great variance of leader style and impact within a group of followers.
Leader's Self-Insight 2.3. Your “LMX” Relationship
Instructions : What was the quality of your leader's relationship with you? Think back to a job you held and recall your feelings toward your leader, or if currently employed use your supervisor. Please answer whether each of the following items was Mostly False or Mostly True for you.
Mostly False Mostly True 1. I very much liked my supervisor as a person. 2. My supervisor defended my work to people above him if I made a mistake. 3. The work I did for my supervisor went well beyond what was required. 4. I admired my supervisor's professional knowledge and ability. 5. My supervisor was enjoyable to work with. 6. I applied extra effort to further the interests of my work group. 7. My supervisor championed my case to others in the organization. 8. I respected my supervisor's management competence.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 117/217
Scoring and Interpretation
LMX theory is about the quality of a leader's relationship with subordinates. If you scored 6 or more Mostly True, your supervisor clearly had an excellent relationship with you, which is stage two in Exhibit 2.6 . You had a successful dyad. If your supervisor had an equally good relationship with every subordinate, that is a stage-three level of development (partnership building). If you scored 3 or fewer Mostly True, then your supervisor was probably at level one, perhaps with different relationships with subordinates, some or all of which were unsuccessful. What do you think accounted for the quality of your and other subordinates' relationships (positive or negative) with your supervisor? Discuss with other students to learn why some supervisors have good LMX relationships.
Source: Source: Based on Robert C. Liden and John M. Maslyn, “Multidimensionality of Leader–Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development,” Journal of Management 24 (1998), pp. 43–72 .
2-4b. Leader–Member Exchange
Stage two in the development of the individualized leadership theory explored the leader–member exchange (LMX) in more detail, discovering that the impact on outcomes depends on how the LMX process develops over time. Studies evaluating characteristics of the LMX relationship explored such things as communication frequency, value agreement, characteristics of followers, job satisfaction, performance, job climate, and commitment. Leaders typically tend to establish in-group exchange relationships with individuals who have characteristics similar to those of the leader, such as similarity in background, interests, and values, and with those who demonstrate a high level of competence and interest in the job. Overall, studies have found that the quality of the LMX relationship is substantially higher for in-group members. LMX theory proposes that this higher-quality relationship will lead to higher performance and greater job satisfaction for in-group members, and research in general supports this idea. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ztth60g8bnprr599t363#ACJAZZM2S04WRK37D011) High-quality LMX relationships have been found to lead to very positive outcomes for leaders, followers, work units, and the organization. For followers, a high-quality exchange relationship may mean more interesting assignments, greater responsibility and authority, and tangible rewards such as pay increases and promotions. Leaders and organizations clearly bene�it from the increased effort and initiative of in-group participants to carry out assignments and tasks successfully.
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 118/217
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 119/217
See A. J. Kinicki and R. P. Vecchio, “In�luences on the Quality of Supervisor-Subordinate Relations: The Role of Time Pressure, Organizational Commitment, and Locus of Control,” Journal of Organizational Behavior (January 1994), pp. 75–82; R. C. Liden, S. J. Wayne, and D. Stilwell, “A Longitudinal Study on the Early Development of Leader– Member Exchanges,” Journal of Applied Psychology (August 1993), pp. 662–674; Yammarino and Dansereau, “Individualized Leadership”; Jean-François Manzoni and Jean- Louis Barsoux, “The Set-Up-to-Fail Syndrome,” Harvard Business Review 76 (March–April 1998), pp. 101–113; Yukl et al., “In�luence of Leader Behaviors on the Leader- Member Exchange Relationship”; and O'Donnell et al., “Leader Behavior and LMX: A Constructive Replication.”
2-4c. Partnership Building
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can build a positive, individualized relationship with each follower to create an equitable work environment and provide greater bene�its to yourself, followers, and the organization.
In this third phase of research, the focus was on whether leaders could develop positive relationships with a large number of subordinates. Critics of early LMX theory pointed out the dangers of leaders establishing sharply differentiated in-group and out-group relationships, in that this may lead to feelings of resentment or even hostility among out-group participants. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ztth60g8bnprr599t363#LLHHMXX34XUT1384R641) If leaders are perceived to be granting excessive bene�its and advantages to in-group members, members of the out-group may rebel, which can damage the entire organization. Moreover, some studies have found that leaders tend to categorize employees into in- groups and out-groups as early as �ive days into their relationship. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ztth60g8bnprr599t363#FJRBVCNB0P51KMC8G947)
W. E. McClane, “Implications of Member Role Differentiation: Analysis of a Key Concept in the LMX Model of Leadership,” Group and Organization Studies 16 (1991), pp. 102–113; and Gary Yukl, Leadership in Organizations , 2nd ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989).
Manzoni and Barsoux, “The Set-Up-to-Fail Syndrome.”
Thus, the third phase of research in this area focused on whether leaders could develop positive relationships with all followers. In this approach, the leader views each person independently and may treat each one in a different but positive way. That is, leaders strive to develop a positive relationship with each subordinate, but the positive relationship will have a different form for each person. For example, one person might be treated with “consideration” and another with “initiating structure,” depending on what followers need to feel involved and to succeed.
In the LMX research study, leaders were trained to offer the opportunity for a high-quality relationship to all group members, and the followers who responded to the offer dramatically improved their performance. As these relationships matured, the entire work group became more productive, and the payoffs were tremendous. Leaders could count on followers to provide the assistance needed for high performance, and followers participated in and in�luenced decisions. The implications of this �inding are that true performance and productivity gains can be achieved by having the leader develop positive relationships one on one with each subordinate.
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
leader–member exchange (LMX) individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 120/217
2-5. Entrepreneurial Traits and Behaviors Another topic of special concern in today's fast-changing world is what traits encourage entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship refers to initiating a business venture, organizing the necessary resources, and assuming the associated risks and rewards. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�bcq1blz7�jk2tn3d294#UBECWCX8VT1X3EE8N232) An entrepreneur recognizes a viable idea for a business product or service and carries it out by �inding and assembling the necessary resources —money, people, machinery, location—to undertake the business venture.
Donald F. Kuratko and Richard M. Hodgetts, Entrepreneurship: A Contemporary Approach , 4th ed. (Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press, 1998), p. 30.
Entrepreneurial leaders display many of the same characteristics as other leaders, but some traits are particularly important for entrepreneurs. Four characteristics considered highly important to entrepreneurial leaders are the following: * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�bcq1blz7�jk2tn3d294#VZMKD0FLMRB5YKC24579)
These are based on Todd Warner, “5 Essential Qualities for Entrepreneurial Leadership,” Forbes (June 8, 2012), http://www.forbes.com/sites/startupviews/2012/06/08/5-essential-qualities-for-entrepreneurial-leadership/ (accessed October 9, 2015); Kristina L. Guo, “Core Competencies of the Entrepreneurial Leader in Health Care Organizations,” Health Care Manager 28 (January–March 2009), pp. 19–29; and Gary A. Knight, “Cross- Cultural Reliability and Validity of a Scale to Measure Firm Entrepreneurial Orientation,” Journal of Business Venturing 12 (1997), pp. 213–225.
Vision and dissatisfaction with the present. To start something new requires that the entrepreneur be dissatis�ied with the way things are now and have a clear vision for how things should be. For example, in the 1970s Bill Gates had what at the time was a radical vision that software itself was a business, and he clearly stated his dissatisfaction that it wasn't. Gates pursued his vision, encapsulated in the idea of a computer in every home and on every desk running Microsoftware. Entrepreneurs are more concerned with innovation, creativity, and creating new processes than with maintaining the status quo.
Ability to get people on board. Entrepreneurial leaders have to continually recruit others to join in, support, and add to the vision. Gates made his vision for a software business widely known and actively engaged with hardware makers like IBM to put the vision into action.
Flexibility, openness to feedback, and ability to learn and adapt. No one has all the answers, and entrepreneurial leaders must be willing to listen, learn, and adapt. Clara Shih, who started Hearsay Social, a platform that helps large companies manage their employees' presence on social media sites, worked hard not only to raise millions in �inancing but to gain the support of Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg as a mentor to help her learn and adapt to changes in the industry. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�bcq1blz7�jk2tn3d294#HLWR8YLYSLV5FJJKN185)
Colleen Leahey, “Doing It for Themselves,” Fortune (October 17, 2011), pp. 144–148.
Persistence and execution. Entrepreneurial leaders are tenacious in pursuit of the vision and take active steps in the here and now to bring the future to life. If one thing doesn't work out, they try another. They are typically highly self-motivated and are willing to stretch themselves and take risks to achieve the vision.
For some leaders, entrepreneurial traits come naturally, but many people can develop these characteristics, as with other leadership qualities. Entrepreneurial leaders start new companies, as Bill Gates did with Microsoft and Clara Shih did with Hearsay Social, but they also exist within established organizations. These leaders take risks to create novel solutions to competitive challenges confronting a business, especially the development or enhancement of products and services. Entrepreneurial leadership is a source of innovation and change for established companies.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 121/217
Leadership Essentials The point of this chapter is to understand the importance of traits and behaviors in the development of leadership theory and research. Some traits associated with effective leadership include optimism, self-con�idence, honesty, and drive. A large number of personal traits and abilities have been associated with successful leaders, but traits themselves are not suf�icient to guarantee effective leadership.
Natural traits and behavior patterns can be developed into strengths. It is important for leaders to recognize their strengths and acknowledge the interdependence that is a key to effective leadership.
Research suggests that different leader strengths might be better suited to different types of leadership roles. The chapter describes three types of roles: operational roles, collaborative roles, and advisory roles. Leaders can be more effective when they are in positions that best match their natural tendencies.
The behavior approach explored autocratic versus democratic leadership, consideration versus initiating structure, employee-centered versus job-centered leadership, and concern for people versus concern for production. The theme of people versus tasks runs through this research, suggesting these are fundamental behaviors through which leaders meet followers' needs. There has been some disagreement in the research about whether a speci�ic leader is either people- or task oriented or whether one can be both. Today, the consensus is that leaders can achieve a “high-high” leadership style.
Another approach is the dyad between a leader and each follower. Followers have different relationships with the leader, and the ability of the leader to develop a positive relationship with each follower contributes to team performance. The LMX theory says that high-quality relationships have a positive outcome for leaders, followers, work units, and the organization. Leaders can attempt to build individualized relationships with each person as a way to meet needs for both consideration and structure.
The historical development of leadership theory presented in this chapter introduces some important ideas about leadership. Although certain personal traits and abilities indicate a greater likelihood for success in a leadership role, they are not in themselves suf�icient to guarantee effective leadership. Behaviors are equally signi�icant. Therefore, the style of leadership demonstrated by an individual greatly determines the outcome of the leadership endeavor. Often, a combination of behavioral styles is most effective. To understand the effects of leadership on outcomes, the speci�ic relationship behavior between a leader and each follower is also an important consideration.
Entrepreneurial leadership is of great concern in today's turbulent environment because entrepreneurial leadership is an important source of innovation and change. Entrepreneurial leaders take risks to bring new organizations into being or create novel solutions to competitive challenges confronting existing organizations.
Discussion Questions 1. Why is it important for leaders to know their strengths? Do you think leaders should spend equal time learning about their weak points?
2. Suggest some personal traits of leaders you have known. What traits do you believe are most valuable? Why?
3. The chapter suggests that optimism is an important trait for a leader, yet some employees complain that optimistic leaders create signi�icant stress because they don't anticipate problems and expect their subordinates to meet unreasonable goals. Do you agree? Why?
4. What is the difference between trait theories and behavioral theories of leadership?
5. Would you feel most comfortable using a “consideration” or an “initiating-structure” leadership style? Discuss the reasons for your answer.
6. The vertical dyad linkage model suggests that followers respond individually to the leader. If this is so, what advice would you give leaders about displaying people-oriented versus task-oriented behavior?
7.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 122/217
Does it make sense to you that a leader should develop an individualized relationship with each follower? Explain advantages and disadvantages to this approach.
8. Why would subordinates under a democratic leader perform better in the leader's absence than would subordinates under an autocratic leader?
9. Why is an entrepreneurial leader important to an organization? How is this role different from other leader roles?
10. Pick three traits from the list in Exhibit 2.1 that you think would be most valuable for a leader in an operational role. Pick three that you think would be most valuable for a leader in a collaborative role. Explain your choices.
Leadership at Work
Your Ideal Leader Traits
Spend some time thinking about someone you believe is an ideal leader. For the �irst part of the exercise, select an ideal leader you have heard about whom you don't personally know. It could be someone like Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln, or any national or international �igure that you admire. Write the person's name here: _____________. Now, in the space below, write down three things you admire about the person, such as what he or she did or the qualities that person possesses.
For the second part of the exercise, select an ideal leader whom you know personally. This can be anyone from your life experiences. Write the person's name here: _____________. Now, in the space below, write down three things you admire about the person, such as what he or she did or the qualities that person possesses.
The �irst leader you chose represents something of a projective test based on what you've heard or read. You imagine the leader has the qualities you listed. The deeds and qualities you listed say more about what you admire than about the actual traits of the leader you chose. This is something like an inkblot test, and it is important because the traits you assign to the leader are traits you are aware of, have the potential to develop, and indeed can develop as a leader. The qualities or achievements you listed are an indicator of the traits you likely will express as you develop into the leader you want to become.
The second leader you chose is someone you know, so it is less of a projective test and represents traits you have had direct experience with. You know these traits work for you and likely will become the traits you develop and express as a leader.
What is similar about the traits you listed for the two leaders? Different? Interview another student in class about traits he or she admires. What do the traits tell you about the person you are interviewing? What are the common themes in your list and the other student's list of traits? To what extent do you display the same traits as the ones on your list? Will you develop those traits even more in the future?
Leadership Development: Cases for Analysis
Consolidated Products
Consolidated Products is a medium-sized manufacturer of consumer products with nonunionized production workers. Ben Samuels was a plant manager for Consolidated Products for 10 years, and he was very well liked by the employees there. They were grateful for the �itness center he built for employees, and they enjoyed the social activities sponsored by the plant several times a year, including company picnics and holiday parties. He knew most of the workers by name, and he spent part of each day walking around the plant to visit with them and ask about their families or hobbies.
Ben believed that it was important to treat employees properly so they would have a sense of loyalty to the company. He tried to avoid any layoffs when production demand was slack, �iguring that the company could not afford to lose skilled workers that are so dif�icult to replace. The workers knew that if they had a special problem, Ben would try to help them. For example, when someone was injured but wanted to continue working, Ben found another job in the plant that the person could do despite having a disability. Ben believed that if you treat people right, they would do a good job for you without close supervision or prodding. Ben applied the same principle to his supervisors, and he mostly left them alone to run their departments as they saw �it. He did not set objectives and standards for the plant, and he never asked the supervisors to develop plans for improving productivity and product quality.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 123/217
Under Ben, the plant had the lowest turnover among the company's �ive plants, but the second worst record for costs and production levels. When the company was acquired by another �irm, Ben was asked to take early retirement, and Phil Jones was brought in to replace him.
Phil had a growing reputation as a manager who could get things done, and he quickly began making changes. Costs were cut by trimming a number of activities such as the �itness center at the plant, company picnics and parties, and the human relations training programs for supervisors. Phil believed that human relations training was a waste of time; if employees don't want to do the work, get rid of them and �ind somebody else who does.
Supervisors were instructed to establish high performance standards for their departments and insist that people achieve them. A computer monitoring system was introduced so that the output of each worker could be checked closely against the standards. Phil told his supervisors to give any worker who had substandard performance one warning, and then if performance did not improve within two weeks to �ire the person. Phil believed that workers don't respect a supervisor who is weak and passive. When Phil observed a worker wasting time or making a mistake, he would reprimand the person right on the spot to set an example. Phil also checked closely on the performance of his supervisors. Demanding objectives were set for each department, and weekly meetings were held with each supervisor to review department performance. Finally, Phil insisted that supervisors check with him �irst before taking any signi�icant actions that deviated from established plans and policies.
As another cost-cutting move, Phil reduced the frequency of equipment maintenance, which required machines to be idled when they could be productive. Since the machines had a good record of reliable operation, Phil believed that the current maintenance schedule was excessive and was cutting into production. Finally, when business was slow for one of the product lines, Phil laid off workers rather than �inding something else for them to do.
By the end of Phil's �irst year as plant manager, production costs were reduced by 20 percent and production output was up by 10 percent. However, three of his seven supervisors left to take other jobs, and turnover was also high among the machine operators. Some of the turnover was due to workers who were �ired, but competent machine operators were also quitting, and it was becoming increasingly dif�icult to �ind any replacements for them. Finally, there was increasing talk of unionizing among the workers. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qrcvjcu9z30dwzfua932#EUUPLFUPG0P43VKKY723)
Reprinted with permission from Gary Yukl, Leadership in Organizations , 4th ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998), p. 66.
Questions 1. Compare the leadership traits and behaviors of Ben Samuels and Phil Jones.
2. Which leader do you think is more effective? Why? Which leader would you prefer to work for?
3. If you were Phil Jones's boss, what would you do now?
Transition to Leadership
My name is Michael Collins. When I was named Southwest Regional Manager of Creighton Auto Parts, a major parts sales and service corporation, I saw the transition period before and immediately following my appointment as an exciting new opportunity. With a degree in automotive engineering and several years' experience in parts manufacturing (design and plant management), I came to the new position with strong industry connections and a keen eye for trends and product innovation.
During the initial stages of the transition, I met with the outgoing regional manager, receiving his input about ongoing business issues, how current services tallied with the corporation's short- and long-term goals, and what he saw as the strengths and weaknesses of the various stores and personnel within the region. While some of these meetings took place at his of�ice, I wanted to avoid the appearance of depending on “the old man” for guidance, so I scheduled most of our meetings off-site to provide more opportunities for frank discussion covering procedures, products and services, and individual stakeholders from employees and board members to suppliers and customers.
In addition, I spent a great deal of time making my own assessments. I knew my company honeymoon period would be limited. My vision and my implementation program had to be clear with well-de�ined strategies. As a �irst step, I sent a lengthy e-mail message to all key players on my new leadership team both as introduction and as a prelude to establishing my vision and transition program.
I traveled around the region meeting with the store managers on my regional team, as well as holding informal meetings with front-line employees. In so doing, I was surprised to tap into the rumor mill and �ind individuals who were eager to talk openly
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 124/217
about their goals, ideas, opinions, and complaints. My questions to front-line workers, in particular, had both positive and negative aspects. I questioned them about their length of service, what they liked most about the company, what areas they thought could be improved, how they rated the culture—things like that. I discovered that for most of them, this was more than just a job. Many had worked for the company for a number of years and had a great deal of pride in the company, as well as a deep sense of responsibility toward their customers.
However, I found this portion of my on-site visits the most intrusive on my time, and in many cases I regretted the amount of time I spent listening to workers. I wondered if the advance warning of my visit allowed too much time for people to prepare their answers. I wondered how many were genuine in their responses and how many were just trying to hold on to their jobs. Worse, I found myself hostage to those who wanted to rant on and on about workplace issues, their training, their bosses, even their customers. I talked to a few customers and didn't get much from that either. As I proceeded through the on-site visits, I found myself growing impatient, increasingly checking my watch to see how soon I should leave for the next appointment on a packed schedule. I admit I expected more from this portion of the transition than I received. However, once I committed to this, I felt obligated to see it through.
More rewarding was the time spent with the marketing staff exploring customer satisfaction levels. In focusing on customers, I zeroed in on three research areas: customer complaints, area demographics, and the compounding customer—those return customers who generate additional sales among their friends and family. Why do customers come? What makes them return? What are their personal “hot buttons”—needs or breaking points in dealing with service industries? Our market research showed large segments of our population in four areas: under 30, over 60, Hispanics, and women. We also saw an increasing number of unemployed and under-employed do-it-yourself customers trying to keep the family vehicle going just a little longer. I personally love analyzing market data.
My question for regional service, sales, and marketing was “how are we reaching and retaining these segments of the population?” Do advertising, Web sites, direct mailing, coupon campaigns, and other marketing strategies match these demographics? For example, are we providing and training Spanish-language sales and service experts and consumer information? With large segments of young people, senior citizens, the unemployed, and single moms, wouldn't these large segments of the population offer fabulous compounding opportunities with focused marketing and price breaks?
As I take the reins, I am excited about the marketing challenges and opportunities ahead. I am an idea guy, a hands-on manager whose ideal is the Renaissance man capable of doing many things very well. I like to surround myself with similar kinds of people. I generate ideas and expect follow-up and accountability. The leadership model I embrace sets the bar high for me and for everyone who works for me. I look forward to injecting a new vision and new standards of service throughout the region.
Questions 1. What do you see as Michael Collins's leadership traits? Which of these traits do you consider a strength? A weakness? Explain.
2. What do you think of Michael Collins's approach to leading the region? How would you characterize his people- oriented versus task-oriented style? Why?
3. How might an understanding of individualized leadership be useful to Collins with respect to his relationship with marketing versus store personnel?
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 125/217
Chapter 3 . Contingency Approaches to Leadership
Your Leadership Challenge After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
Understand how leadership is often contingent on people and situations. Apply Hersey and Blanchard's situational theory of leader style to the level of follower readiness. Apply Fiedler's contingency model to key relationships among leader style, situational favorability, and group task performance. Explain the path–goal theory of leadership. Use the Vroom–Jago model to identify the correct amount of follower participation in speci�ic decision situations. Know how to use the power of situational variables to substitute for or neutralize the need for leadership.
A few hours after being named only the third CEO in Microsoft's history, Satya Nadella held a short impromptu town hall Webcast, near the end of which he said, “If you have to get back to [something] because it's more interesting or important, please …” The gesture re�lects the style of Nadella, who previously led the company's cloud and enterprise businesses, as a quiet, humble leader who emphasizes listening, helpfulness, and collaboration. Previous CEO Steve Ballmer, in contrast, had a forceful, driven approach to leadership and was known for his competitiveness and exuberant displays of emotion. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/gasttskweckjdey2n090#NFVW366EFY4EU34PD601) Yet both leaders have been successful within the same organization.
Ryan Nakashima, “New Microsoft CEO's Collegial Style Sparks Hope,” USA Today (February 9, 2014) http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/02/09/new- microsoft-ceo-hope/5340519/ (http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/02/09/new-microsoft-ceo-hope/5340519/) (accessed October 12, 2015).
This example points to what researchers of leader traits and behaviors eventually discovered: Many different leadership styles can be effective. What, then, determines the success of a leadership style?
One factor that affects what leadership approach will be most effective is the situation in which leadership activities occur. Over the years, researchers have observed that leaders frequently behave situationally—that is, they adjust their leadership style depending on a variety of factors in the situations they face. In this chapter, we discuss the elements of leader, followers, and the situation, and the impact each has upon the others. We examine several theories that de�ine how leadership styles, follower attributes, and organizational characteristics �it together to enable successful leadership. The important point of this chapter is that the most effective leadership approach depends on many factors. Understanding the contingency approaches can help a leader adapt his or her approach, although it is important to recognize that leaders also develop their ability to adapt through experience and practice.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 126/217
3-1. The Contingency Approach The failure to �ind universal leader traits or behaviors that would always determine effective leadership led researchers in a new direction. Although leader behavior was still examined, the central focus of the new research was the situation in which leadership occurred. The basic tenet of this focus was that behavior effective in some circumstances might be ineffective under different conditions. Thus, the effectiveness of leader behavior is contingent upon organizational situations. Aptly called contingency approaches , these theories explain the relationship between leadership styles and effectiveness in speci�ic situations.
In Exhibit 3.1 , the universalistic approach as described in Chapter 2 is compared to the contingency approach described in this chapter. In Chapter 2 , researchers were investigating traits or behaviors that could improve performance and satisfaction in any or all situations. They sought universal leadership traits and behaviors. Contingency means that one thing depends on other things, and for a leader to be effective there must be an appropriate �it between the leader's behavior and style and the conditions in the situation. A leadership style that works in one situation might not work in another situation. There is no one best way of leadership. Contingency means “it depends.” Many leaders today look to an early twentieth-century explorer for inspiration on how to lead through an extreme situation, as described in this chapter's Leader's Bookshelf .
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 127/217
Exhibit 3.1. Comparing the Universalistic and Contingency Approaches to Leadership
Leader's Bookshelf Shackleton's Way: Leadership Lessons from the Great Antarctic Explorer by Margot Morrell and Stephanie Capparell
“Men wanted for hazardous journey. Small wages. Bitter cold. Long months of complete darkness. Constant danger. Safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in case of success.”
a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency a theory meaning one thing depends on other things
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 128/217
Would you sign up for this job? When Sir Ernest Shackleton set out with a crew of 27 in 1914 with the goal of crossing the continent of Antarctica on foot, he probably didn't understand how utterly true the wording of his ad would turn out to be. His boat, the Endurance , never even touched land but became stuck in ice in the Weddell Sea for months and eventually sank. The men were left drifting on ice �loes 1,200 miles from civilization, in dangerous cold, with only three lifeboats and limited provisions. They must have been terri�ied, and things didn't get much better for almost two long, brutal years. But, amazingly, every member of Shackleton's crew survived.
Margot Morrell and Stephanie Capparell analyzed the diaries of Shackleton and crew members to understand what brand of leadership enabled their survival through severe cold, isolation, near starvation, life-threatening storms, and all manner of other hardships. Their book tells a fascinating and inspiring adventure story but also offers lessons for today's leaders about how to lead in a situation of great stress and hardship.
Lessons for Leading in Tough Times
Shackleton's team eventually made it to a small island and waited while Shackleton and a few members took a small boat 800 miles over treacherous seas to a whaling station, and then Shackleton took a ship back to rescue the others. Here are some tips from Shackleton's handling of the crew that apply to leading through any tough situation.
Step up immediately . After they abandoned the sinking ship, Shackleton encouraged people with a simple speech that acknowledged the dangers but expressed optimism and made clear that he was in charge and he would lead them through this. “Optimism is true moral courage,” Shackleton is quoted as saying. By expressing optimism, Shackleton reminded crew members of the faith he had in each of them.
Keep fairness in mind always . Shackleton placed great value on every member of the crew, and he gained their admiration and respect by his fair, consistent, and egalitarian treatment of them. Each member was expected to do any job on the ship. One high-ranking crew member wrote: “[S]crubbing the �loors … humbles one and knocks out of one any last remnants of false pride that one may have left in one and for this reason I do it voluntarily.”
Let everyone contribute to success . When disaster struck, Shackleton knew the various tasks that had to be performed if the group were to survive, and he made sure everyone had assignments that let them contribute to the solution to their dire predicament. To keep spirits high, he used humor and other diversions (one of the few items he rescued from the sinking ship was a banjo). He took the most dif�icult people into his own tent to win their support and prevent them from infecting the rest of the crew with discouragement.
Adaptability Makes It Possible
Shackleton always looked ahead and kept his eye on the big picture, which enabled him to quickly change course in the face of the unexpected. Communication, especially by listening , helped him see when a new course of action might be needed. Just before the Endurance sailed, he �ired the cook and three crew members because he learned through listening and observation that they could damage the morale and effectiveness of the crew. “Shackleton's optimism was never foolhardy,” the book points out. He had con�idence in his own abilities and in the abilities of his crew, and he was able to stay �lexible enough to abandon what wasn't working and try something new. It's a big part of the reason the group survived—and why eight of the crew members came forward to join Shackleton on his �inal expedition some years later.
Source: Shackleton's Way , by Margot Morrell and Stephanie Capparell, is published by Viking Penguin.
The contingencies most important to leadership as shown in Exhibit 3.1 are the situation and followers. Research implies that situational variables such as task, structure, context, and environment are important to leadership style. The nature of followers has also been identi�ied as a key contingency. Thus, the needs, maturity, and cohesiveness of followers make a signi�icant difference to the best style of leadership.
Several models of situational leadership have been developed. The situational theory of Hersey and Blanchard, the contingency model developed by Fiedler and his associates, path–goal theory, the Vroom–Jago model of decision participation, and the
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 129/217
substitutes-for-leadership concept will all be described in this chapter. These Contingency approaches seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively. Assuming that a leader can properly diagnose a situation and muster the �lexibility to behave according to the appropriate style, successful outcomes are highly likely.
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 130/217
New Leader Action Memo
Complete the questionnaire in Leader's Self-Insight 3.1 to assess your relative emphasis on two important categories of leadership behavior.
Two basic leadership behaviors that can be adjusted to address various contingencies are task behavior and relationship behavior , introduced in Chapter 2 . Research has identi�ied these two meta-categories , or broadly de�ined behavior categories, as applicable to leadership in a variety of situations and time periods. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/lgvk5�jftc7n2dkd9502#SHAG3J5TVAVSYPHXZ585) A leader can adapt his or her style to be high or low on both task and relationship behavior. Exhibit 3.2 illustrates the four possible behavior approaches—low task–high relationship, high task–high relationship, high task–low relationship, and low task–low relationship. The exhibit describes typical task and relationship behaviors. High task behaviors include planning short-term activities, clarifying tasks, objectives, and role expectations, and monitoring operations and performance. High relationship behaviors include providing support and recognition, developing followers' skills and con�idence, and consulting and empowering followers when making decisions and solving problems. Most leaders typically lean toward being stronger in either task-oriented or relationship-oriented behavior, but most experts suggest that a balance of concern for tasks and concern for people is crucial for leadership success over the long term. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/lgvk5�jftc7n2dkd9502#RDCELXR1NQAUR8W2T298)
Gary Yukl, Angela Gordon, and Tom Taber, “A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Leadership Behavior: Integrating a Half Century of Behavior Research,” Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies 9, no. 1 (2002), pp. 15–32; and Gary Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior: What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives (November 2012), pp. 66–81.
See Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior”; Lee Ellis, “Results/Relationships: Finding the Right Balance,” Leadership Excellence (October 2012), p. 10; and Kate Ward, “Personality Style: Key to Effective Leadership,” Leadership Excellence (August 2012), p. 14.
approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Contingency approaches approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 131/217
Exhibit 3.2. Meta-Categories of Leader Behavior and Four Leader Styles
Sources: Based on Based on Gary Yukl, Angela Gordon, and Tom Taber, “A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Leadership Behavior: Integrating a Half Century of Behavior Research,” Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies 9, no. 1 (2002), pp. 15–32 and Gary Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior: What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives (November 2012), pp. 66–81.
Both Hersey and Blanchard's situational theory and Fiedler's contingency model, discussed in the following sections, use these meta-categories of leadership behavior but apply them based on different sets of contingencies.
Leader's Self-Insight 3.1. T–P Leadership Questionnaire: An Assessment of Style
Instructions : The following items describe aspects of leadership behavior. Assume you are the appointed leader of a student group and feel the pressure for performance improvements to succeed. Respond to each item according to the way you would most likely act in this pressure situation . Indicate whether each item below is Mostly False or Mostly True for you as a work-group leader.
Mostly False Mostly True 1. I would hold members personally accountable for their performance. 2. I would assign members to speci�ic roles and tasks. 3. I would ask the members to work harder. 4. I would check on people to know how they are doing. 5. I would focus more on execution than on being pleasant with members. 6. I would try to make members' work more pleasant. 7. I would focus on maintaining a pleasant atmosphere on the team. 8. I would let members do their work the way they think best. 9. I would be concerned with people's personal feelings and welfare. 10. I would go out of my way to be helpful to members.
Scoring and Interpretation
The T–P Leadership Questionnaire is scored as follows: Your T score represents task orientation and is the number of Mostly True answers for questions 1–5. Your P score represents your people or relationship orientation and is the number of Mostly True answers for questions 6–10. A score of 4 or 5 would be considered high for either T or P. A score of 0 or 1 would be considered low. T = _ _ _. P = _ _ _.
Some leaders focus on people needs, leaving task concerns to followers. Other leaders focus on task details with the expectation that followers will carry out instructions. Depending on the situation, both approaches may be effective. The important issue is the ability to identify relevant dimensions of the situation and behave accordingly. Through this questionnaire, you can identify your relative emphasis on the two dimensions of task orientation (T) and people orientation (P). These are not opposite approaches, and an individual can rate high or low on either or both.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 132/217
What is your leadership orientation? Compare your results from this assignment to your result from the quiz in Leader's Self-Insight 2.2 in Chapter 2 . What would you consider an ideal leader situation for your style?
Source: Based on the T–P Leadership Questionnaire as published in “Toward a Particularistic Approach to Leadership Style: Some Findings,” by T. J. Sergiovanni, R. Metzcus, and L. Burden, American Educational Research Journal 6, no. 1 (1969), pp. 62–79.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 133/217
3-2. Hersey and Blanchard's Situational Theory The Situational theory developed by Hersey and Blanchard is an interesting extension of the Leadership Grid outlined in Chapter 2 . This approach focuses on the characteristics of followers as the most important element of the situation and consequently of determining effective leader behavior. The point of Hersey and Blanchard's theory is that subordinates vary in readiness level. People low in task readiness, because of little ability or training, or insecurity, need a different leadership style than those who are high in readiness and have good ability, skills, con�idence, and willingness to work. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/kgbbh5sa0rljf14n0356#RZJCYSHZ7W8DP1NNZ582)
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 134/217
Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard, Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources , 4th ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1982).
3-2a. Leader Style
According to the situational theory, a leader can adopt one of four leadership styles, based on a combination of relationship (concern for people) and task (concern for production) behavior. The appropriate style depends on the readiness level of followers.
Exhibit 3.3 summarizes the relationship between leader style and follower readiness. The upper part of the exhibit indicates the style of the leader, which is based on a combination of concern for people and concern for production tasks. The bell-shaped curve is called a prescriptive curve because it indicates when each style should be used. The four styles are telling, selling, participating, and delegating. The telling style (S1) is a very directive approach that re�lects a high concern for tasks and a low concern for people and relationships, as shown in the exhibit. The leader provides detailed objectives and explicit instructions about how tasks should be accomplished. The selling style (S2) is based on a high concern for both relationships and tasks. With this approach, the leader provides task instruction and personal support, explains decisions, and gives followers a chance to ask questions and gain clarity about work tasks. The participating style (S3) is characterized by high relationship and low task behavior. The leader encourages participation, consults with followers, and facilitates decision making. The fourth style, the delegating style (S4) , re�lects a low concern for both tasks and relationships. This leader provides little direction or support because complete responsibility for decisions and their implementation is turned over to followers.
Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
Situational theory Hersey and Blanchard's extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 135/217
Exhibit 3.3. The Situational Model of Leadership
Based on Based on Gary Yukl, Angela Gordon, and Tom Taber, “A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Leadership Behavior: Integrating a Half Century of Behavior Research,“ Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 9, no 1 (2002), pp. 15–32; and Paul Hersey, Kenneth Blanchard and Dewey Johnson, Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources , 7th ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996).
3-2b. Follower Readiness
The appropriate style depends on the readiness level of followers, indicated in the lower part of Exhibit 3.3 . R1 represents low readiness and R4 represents high follower readiness. The essence of Hersey and Blanchard's situational theory is for the leader to diagnose a follower's readiness and select a style that is appropriate for the readiness level, such as the follower's degree of education and skills, experience, self-con�idence, and work attitudes.
R1 Low Readiness When one or more followers exhibit very low levels of readiness, the leader has to use a telling style, telling followers exactly what to do, directing them in how to do it, and specifying timelines. For example, Phil Hagans owns two McDonald's franchises in northeast Houston and gives many young workers their �irst job. He uses a telling style regarding everything from how to dress to the correct way to clean the grill, giving young workers the strong direction they need to develop to higher levels of skill and self-con�idence. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/kgbbh5sa0rljf14n0356#XURXTHK520XSSBR8D641)
Jonathan Kaufman, “A McDonald's Owner Becomes a Role Model for Black Teenagers,” The Wall Street Journal (August 23, 1995), pp. A1, A6.
R2 Moderate Readiness A selling leadership style works well when followers lack some skills or experience for the job but demonstrate con�idence, ability, and willingness to learn. With a selling style, the leader gives some direction but also explains
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 136/217
decisions and clari�ies tasks for followers rather than merely instructing how tasks should be performed. Sheryl Sandberg uses a selling style as chief operating of�icer at Facebook. Many Facebook employees are fresh out of college with little experience, but they are energetic, enthusiastic, and committed. Sandberg's style combines decisive leadership with persuasion and consensus building. She uses logic and data to explain her decisions, but she also seeks input and feedback from employees. She describes herself as a leader who tends to “mentor and demand at the same time.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/kgbbh5sa0rljf14n0356#UJCD2ZBZDLX1BB9Y5739)
Carol Hymowitz, “New Face at Facebook Hopes to Map Out a Road to Growth,” The Wall Street Journal (April 14, 2008), p. B1.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can tell followers how to perform their tasks if they have few skills, little experience, or low self- con�idence. If followers have a moderate degree of skill and show enthusiasm and willingness to learn, provide direction but seek followers' input and explain your decisions.
R3 High Readiness A participating style can be effective when followers have the necessary education, skills, and experience but might be insecure in their abilities and need some encouragement from the leader. The leader can guide followers' development and act as a resource for advice and assistance. An example of the participating style is Eric Brevig, a visual-effects supervisor with Industrial Light and Magic, who maximizes the creativity of artists and animators by encouraging participation. Rather than telling people how to do their jobs, Brevig presents them with a challenge and works with them to �igure out the best way to meet it. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/kgbbh5sa0rljf14n0356#BVTCWQZ1W9ED5074C601)
Cheryl Dahle, “Xtreme Teams,” Fast Company (November 1999), pp. 310–326.
R4 Very High Readiness The delegating style of leadership can be effectively used when followers have very high levels of ability, experience, con�idence, and willingness to accept responsibility for their own task behavior. The leader provides a general goal and suf�icient authority to do the tasks as followers see �it. Highly educated professionals such as lawyers, college professors, and social workers would typically fall into this category. There are followers in almost every organization who demonstrate very high readiness.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can act as a resource to provide advice and guidance when followers have a high level of skill, experience, and responsibility. Delegate responsibility for decisions and their implementation to followers who have very high levels of skill and positive attitudes.
In summary, the telling style (S1) works best for followers who demonstrate very low levels of readiness to take responsibility for their own task behavior, the selling style (S2) is effective for followers with moderate readiness, the participating style (S3) works well for followers with high readiness, and the participating style (S4) is appropriate for followers with very high readiness. In today's multigenerational workplace, with people of widely different ages and readiness levels working side by side, many leaders �ind that they have to use multiple styles. Aaron Brown supervises a team at IBM that includes employees who span four decades in age, have work experience of between 3 and 30 years, and have varied attitudes, expectations, and ways of working. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/kgbbh5sa0rljf14n0356#NUUH0KSTSQ9EZ5PWR680) For Brown, getting the best performance out of employees who differ so widely is as challenging—and as energizing—as coping with today's faster, more competitive business landscape.
Carol Hymowitz, “Managers Find Ways to Get Generations to Close Culture Gap,” (In the Lead column), The Wall Street Journal (July 9, 2007), p. B1.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 137/217
Hersey and Blanchard's contingency model focuses only on the characteristics of followers, not those of the larger situation. The leader should evaluate subordinates and adopt whichever style is needed. Using an inappropriate style can hurt morale and performance, as illustrated by the following example.
In the Lead Laura Smith, Yola
When 26-year-old Laura Smith opened a yogurt and coffee shop in Washington, D.C. in 2010, she thought she had a winning formula with D.C.'s only fresh yogurt bar. Less than two years later, Yola closed its doors and Smith was looking for a new career. There were several reasons Yola didn't make it, not least of all the very high rent cost. Yet Smith also acknowledges that an incorrect leadership style hurt the business.
Smith says that if she could have a “do-over,” she would provide more structure, more rules, and more boundaries for her employees, something that is needed in a business where most employees are young and have little work experience. Smith wanted to run her business by allowing employees to have the freedom to express their personal creativity, and she hated the idea of “telling grown adults when they can take breaks, exactly how to slice a scone out of a baking sheet, and exactly how many minutes late they can be.” However, she soon found that her business became characterized by an attitude of permissiveness, where many employees showed up late, performed sloppy work, or did as little as possible while they were on the clock. No one was happy with the work environment.
Smith realized that her employees needed and even wanted to be told what and how to do things. “It's the thing I wish I could go back and do over—not because it would have saved my business but because everyone, myself included, would have been so much happier,” she says. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/kgbbh5sa0rljf14n0356#UVXGJS6VL9LLR87ED566)
Laura Smith, “Why I Regret Being a Nice Boss,” Slate.com (October 2, 2014), http://www.slate.com/articles/business/building_a_better_workplace/2014/10/why_i_regret_being_a_nice_boss_setting_boundaries_with_employees.html (http://www.slate.com/articles/business/building_a_better_workplace/2014/10/why_i_regret_being_a_nice_boss_setting_boundaries_with_employees.html) (accessed October 12, 2015); and Jessica Sigman, “Closing Time: On Its Last Day, Yola Opens Up About Shutting Down,” Washington City Paper (October 3, 2012), http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/youngandhungry/2012/10/03/closing-time-on-its-last-day-yola-opens-up-about-shutting-down/ (http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/youngandhungry/2012/10/03/closing-time-on-its-last-day-yola-opens-up-about-shutting-down/) (accessed October 12, 2015).
New Leader Action Memo
Answer the questions in Leader's Self-Insight 3.2 to determine your own readiness level and the style of leadership that would be most appropriate for you as a follower.
Laura Smith tried to use a selling or participating style because these approaches �it with her idea of what a “good” leader should be. She failed to realize that many of her employees were at a low readiness level and needed a telling style, with the leader providing clear instructions and speci�ic rules regarding activities and work behavior.
In the Hersey–Blanchard model, leaders can tailor their approach to individual subordinates, similar to the leader–member exchange theory described in Chapter 2 . If one follower is at a low readiness level, the leader must be very speci�ic, telling the employee exactly what to do, how to do it, and when. For a follower high in readiness, the leader provides a general goal and suf�icient authority to do the task as the follower sees �it. Leaders can carefully diagnose the readiness level of followers and then apply the appropriate style.
Leader's Self-Insight 3.2. Are You Ready?
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 138/217
Instructions : A leader's style can be contingent upon the readiness level of followers. Think of yourself working in your current or former job. Answer the following questions based on how you are on that job. Please answer whether each item is Mostly False or Mostly True for you in that job.
Mostly False Mostly True 1. I typically do the exact work required of me, nothing more or less. 2. I am often bored and uninterested in the tasks I have to perform. 3. I take extended breaks whenever I can. 4. I have great interest and enthusiasm for the job. 5. I am recognized as an expert by colleagues and coworkers. 6. I have a need to perform to the best of my ability. 7. I have a great deal of relevant education and experience for this type of work. 8. I am involved in “extra-work” activities such as committees. 9. I prioritize my work and manage my time well.
Scoring and Interpretation
In the situational theory of leadership, the higher the follower's readiness, the more participative and delegating the leader can be. Give yourself one point for each Mostly False answer to items 1–3 and one point for each Mostly True answer to items 4–9. A score of 8–9 points would suggest a “very high” readiness level. A score of 7–8 points would indicate a “high” readiness level. A score of 4–6 points would suggest “moderate” readiness, and 0–3 points would indicate “low” readiness. What is the appropriate leadership style for your readiness level? What leadership style did your supervisor use with you? What do you think accounted for your supervisor's style? Discuss your results with other students to explore which leadership styles are actually used with subordinates who are at different readiness levels.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 139/217
3-3. Fiedler's Contingency Model Fiedler and his associates developed a model that takes not only followers but other elements of the situation into consideration. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/lenesa8fpfq2vkyj2347#EGRGFE03722W4RWSN566) Although the model is somewhat complicated, the basic idea is simple: Match the leader's style with the situation most favorable for his or her success. Fiedler's contingency model was designed to enable leaders to diagnose both leadership style and organizational situation.
Fiedler's contingency model a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
Fiedler's contingency model a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
Fiedler's contingency model a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
Fiedler's contingency model a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
Fiedler's contingency model a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
Fiedler's contingency model a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
Fiedler's contingency model a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
Fiedler's contingency model
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 140/217
Fred E. Fiedler, “Assumed Similarity Measures as Predictors of Team Effectiveness,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49 (1954), pp. 381–388; F. E. Fiedler, Leader Attitudes and Group Effectiveness (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1958); and F. E. Fiedler, A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967).
3-3a. Leadership Style
The cornerstone of Fiedler's theory is the extent to which the leader's style is relationship-oriented or task-oriented. A relationship-oriented leader is concerned with people. As with the consideration style described in Chapter 2 , a relationship- oriented leader establishes mutual trust and respect and listens to employees' needs. A task-oriented leader is primarily motivated by task accomplishment. Similar to the initiating structure style described in Chapter 2 , a task-oriented leader provides clear directions and sets performance standards.
Leadership style was measured with a questionnaire known as the least preferred coworker (LPC) scale. The LPC scale has a set of 16 bipolar adjectives along an eight-point scale. Examples of the bipolar adjectives used by Fiedler on the LPC scale follow:
open guarded quarrelsome harmonious ef�icient inef�icient self-assured hesitant gloomy cheerful
If the leader describes the least preferred coworker using positive concepts, he or she is considered relationship-oriented, that is, a leader who cares about and is sensitive to other people's feelings. Conversely, if a leader uses negative concepts to describe the least preferred coworker, he or she is considered task-oriented, that is, a leader who sees other people in negative terms and places greater value on task activities than on people.
3-3b. Situation
Fiedler's model presents the leadership situation in terms of three key elements that can be either favorable or unfavorable to a leader: the quality of leader–member relations, task structure, and position power.
Leader–member relations refers to group atmosphere and members' attitudes toward and acceptance of the leader. When subordinates trust, respect, and have con�idence in the leader, leader–member relations are considered good. When subordinates distrust, do not respect, and have little con�idence in the leader, leader–member relations are poor.
a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
Fiedler's contingency model a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
Fiedler's contingency model a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
Fiedler's contingency model a model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 141/217
Task structure refers to the extent to which tasks performed by the group are de�ined, involve speci�ic procedures, and have clear, explicit goals. Routine, well-de�ined tasks, such as those of assembly-line workers, have a high degree of structure. Creative, ill-de�ined tasks, such as research and development or strategic planning, have a low degree of task structure. When task structure is high, the situation is considered favorable to the leader; when low, the situation is less favorable.
Position power is the extent to which the leader has formal authority over subordinates. Position power is high when the leader has the power to plan and direct the work of subordinates, evaluate it, and reward or punish them. Position power is low when the leader has little authority over subordinates and cannot evaluate their work or reward them. When position power is high, the situation is considered favorable for the leader; when low, the situation is unfavorable.
When leader–member relations are good, task structure is high, and position power is strong, the situation is considered highly favorable to the leader. When leader–member relations are poor, task structure is low, and leader position power is weak, the situation is considered highly unfavorable to the leader. The situation would be considered moderately favorable when some of the three elements are high and others low. That is, a leader might have strong position power but tasks are unstructured and leader–member relations are poor. Or, leader–member relations might be good, but position power is weak and tasks are unstructured. There can be various levels of moderate favorability based on various combinations of the three key elements.
3-3c. Contingency Theory
When Fiedler examined the relationships among leadership style, situational favorability, and group task performance, he found the pattern shown in Exhibit 3.4 . Task-oriented leaders are more effective when the situation is either highly favorable or highly unfavorable. Relationship-oriented leaders are more effective in situations of moderate favorability.
Exhibit 3.4. Fiedler's Classi�ication: How Leader Style Fits the Situation
Source: Based on Fred E. Fiedler, “The Effects of Leadership Training and Experience: A Contingency Model Interpretation,” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1972), p. 455.
The task-oriented leader excels in the highly favorable situation because everyone gets along, the task is clear, and the leader has power; all that is needed is for someone to take charge and provide direction. Similarly, if the situation is highly unfavorable to the leader, a great deal of structure and task direction are needed. A strong leader de�ines task structure and can establish authority over subordinates. Because leader–member relations are poor anyway, a strong task orientation will make no difference to the leader's popularity. Consider how Sergio Marchionne's task-oriented leadership style �it the situation he found at Chrysler.
In the Lead Sergio Marchionne, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
The fate of the smallest of the Big Three U.S. automakers rests in the hands of Italian-born Sergio Marchionne, who rescued Fiat from the brink of collapse a few years ago with his close attention to detail. Marchionne is a strong task- oriented leader. Rather than settling into the top-�loor executive suite at Chrysler's Auburn Hills, Michigan, headquarters, Marchionne chose an of�ice in the fourth-�loor engineering center. He carries six smartphones and keeps tabs on the smallest details, down to a faulty door handle on the new Dodge Charger. “If you really want to run the business,” he says, “you need to get involved at this level.”
Marchionne came into a highly unfavorable situation at Chrysler. Like General Motors, Chrysler had to be rescued by a federal bailout several years ago, and Marchionne took charge just after the company emerged from bankruptcy and Fiat assumed part ownership. Sales were slumping, Chrysler's image was tarnished, morale and motivation were low, costs
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 142/217
were high, and operational problems plagued the company. Marchionne became known at Fiat for working long hours, seven days a week, and he told his top executives at Chrysler to plan on doing the same for the foreseeable future. He meets with managers regularly and gives them speci�ic orders for what he wants to see accomplished. Managers who were committed to staying stuck in the old way of doing things were �ired.
Chrysler has been slower to bounce back than GM, but Marchionne's task-oriented leadership is having a positive effect. Sales are improving, and operational problems have been brought under control. In addition, Marchionne's hard-hitting approach has brought a refreshing energy into the organization, giving employees a greater sense of hope and motivation. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/lenesa8fpfq2vkyj2347#QMUVHM2WM1KFRHA0B038)
Neal E. Boudette, “Fiat CEO Sets New Tone at Chrysler,” The Wall Street Journal (June 21, 2009), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124537403628329989.html (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124537403628329989.html) (accessed September 14, 2012); and Jeff Bennett and Neal E. Boudette, “Boss Sweats Details of Chrysler Revival,” The Wall Street Journal (January 31, 2011), p. A1; and Kate Linebaugh and Jeff Bennett, “Marchionne Upends Chrysler's Ways,” The Wall Street Journal (January 12, 2010), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703652104574652364158366106.html (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703652104574652364158366106.html) (accessed September 14, 2012).
Sergio Marchionne's task-oriented style is appropriate for the dif�icult situation he found at Chrysler. Researchers at the University of Chicago looked at CEOs of companies in turnaround situations—where companies typically have high debt loads and a need to improve results in a hurry—and found that tough-minded, task-focused characteristics such as analytical skills, a focus on ef�iciency, and setting high standards were more valuable leader qualities than were relationship skills such as good communication, listening, and teamwork. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/lenesa8fpfq2vkyj2347#JRQWYEJ738PVEPJ4X843)
Reported in George Anders, “Theory & Practice: Tough CEOs Often Most Successful, a Study Finds,” The Wall Street Journal (November 19, 2007), p. B3.
The relationship-oriented leader performs better in situations of moderate favorability because human relations skills are important in achieving high group performance. In these situations, the leader may be moderately well liked, have some power, and supervise jobs that contain some ambiguity. A leader with good interpersonal skills can create a positive group atmosphere that will improve relationships, clarify task structure, and establish position power.
A leader, then, needs to know two things in order to use Fiedler's contingency theory. First, the leader should know whether he or she has a relationship- or task-oriented style. Second, the leader should diagnose the situation and determine whether leader–member relations, task structure, and position power are favorable or unfavorable.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can effectively use a task-oriented style when the organizational situation is either highly unfavorable or highly favorable to you as a leader. Use a relationship-oriented style in situations of moderate favorability because human relations skills can create a positive atmosphere.
An important contribution of Fiedler's research is that it goes beyond the notion of leadership styles to try to show how styles �it the situation. Many studies have been conducted to test Fiedler's model, and the research in general provides some support for the model. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/lenesa8fpfq2vkyj2347#TWHW0RVNVF06U9XN9331) However, Fiedler's model has also been criticized. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/lenesa8fpfq2vkyj2347#PTQVWSF3PZ4X5CGUY216) Using the LPC score as a measure of relationship- or task-oriented behavior seems simplistic to some researchers, and the weights used to determine situation favorability seem to have been determined in an arbitrary manner. In addition, some observers argue that the empirical support for the model is weak because it is based on correlational results that fail to achieve statistical signi�icance in the majority of cases. The model also isn't clear about how the model works over time. For instance, if a task- oriented leader such as Sergio Marchionne is matched with an unfavorable situation and is successful, the organizational situation is likely to improve, thus becoming a situation more appropriate for a relationship-oriented leader. Will Marchionne's
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 143/217
task-oriented style continue to be effective under more favorable circumstances at Chrysler? Can or should he try to shift to a more relationship-oriented leader style? Fiedler's model doesn't address this issue.
M. J. Strube and J. E. Garcia, “A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Fiedler's Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness,” Psychological Bulletin 90 (1981), pp. 307–321; and L. H. Peters, D. D. Hartke, and J. T. Pohlmann, “Fiedler's Contingency Theory of Leadership: An Application of the Meta-Analysis Procedures of Schmidt and Hunter,” Psychological Bulletin 97 (1985), pp. 274–285.
R. Singh, “Leadership Style and Reward Allocation: Does Least Preferred Coworker Scale Measure Tasks and Relation Orientation?” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 27 (1983), pp. 178–197; D. Hosking, “A Critical Evaluation of Fiedler's Contingency Hypotheses,” Progress in Applied Psychology 1 (1981), pp. 103–154; Gary Yukl, “Leader LPC Scores: Attitude Dimensions and Behavioral Correlates,” Journal of Social Psychology 80 (1970), pp. 207–212; G. Graen, K. M. Alvares, J. B. Orris, and J. A. Martella, “Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: Antecedent and Evidential Results,” Psychological Bulletin 74 (1970), pp. 285–296; and R. P. Vecchio, “Assessing the Validity of Fiedler's Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: A Closer Look at Strube and Garcia,” Psychological Bulletin 93 (1983), pp. 404–408.
Finally, Fiedler's model and much of the subsequent research fail to consider medium LPC leaders, who some studies indicate are more effective than either high or low LPC leaders in a majority of situations. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/lenesa8fpfq2vkyj2347#VXDHHVRJWDG2BFCRK149) Leaders who score in the mid-range on the LPC scale presumably balance the concern for relationships with a concern for task achievement more effectively than high or low LPC leaders, making them more adaptable to a variety of situations.
J. K. Kennedy, Jr., “Middle LPC Leaders and the Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 30 (1982), pp. 1–14; and S. C. Shi�lett, “The Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: Some Implications of Its Statistical and Methodological Properties,” Behavioral Science 18, no. 6 (1973), pp. 429–440.
New research has continued to improve Fiedler's model, * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/lenesa8fpfq2vkyj2347#SJZC9LSLJVV6A6D2K051) and it is still considered an important contribution to leadership studies. However, its major impact may have been to stir other researchers to consider situational factors more seriously. A number of other situational theories have been developed in the years since Fiedler's original research.
Roya Ayman, M. M. Chemers, and F. Fiedler, “The Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: Its Levels of Analysis,” Leadership Quarterly 6, no. 2 (1995), pp. 147–167.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 144/217
3-4. Path–Goal Theory
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can increase follower motivation, satisfaction, and performance by adopting a leadership behavior that will clarify the follower's path to receiving available rewards or increase the availability of rewards the follower desires.
According to the Path–goal theory , the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation to attain personal and organizational goals. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qrwl7q293rq1qsua4808#FHDH0C24DQV974965239) As illustrated in Exhibit 3.5 , the leader increases follower motivation by either (1) clarifying the follower's path to the rewards that are available or (2) increasing the rewards that the follower values and desires. Path clari�ication means that the leader works with subordinates to help them identify and learn the behaviors that will lead to successful task accomplishment and organizational rewards. Increasing rewards means that the leader talks with subordinates to learn which rewards are important to them— that is, whether they desire intrinsic rewards from the work itself or extrinsic rewards such as raises or promotions. The leader's job is to increase personal payoffs to subordinates for goal attainment and to make the paths to these payoffs clear and easy to travel. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qrwl7q293rq1qsua4808#UXWXFJKC9WUGFX0SJ364)
Path–goal theory a contingency approach to leadership in which the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
Path–goal theory a contingency approach to leadership in which the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
Path–goal theory a contingency approach to leadership in which the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
Path–goal theory a contingency approach to leadership in which the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
Path–goal theory a contingency approach to leadership in which the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 145/217
Robert J. House, “A Path–Goal Theory of Leadership Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly 16 (1971), pp. 321–338.
Robert J. House, “A Path–Goal Theory of Leadership Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly 16 (1971), pp. 321–338.
Exhibit 3.5. Leader Roles in the Path–Goal Model
Source: Reprinted from Organizational Dynamics , 13 (Winter 1985), Bernard M. Bass, “Leadership: Good, Better, Best,” pp. 26–40, Copyright 1985, with permission from Elsevier.
Path–goal theory a contingency approach to leadership in which the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
Path–goal theory a contingency approach to leadership in which the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
Path–goal theory a contingency approach to leadership in which the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
Path–goal theory a contingency approach to leadership in which the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
Path–goal theory a contingency approach to leadership in which the leader's responsibility is to increase subordinates' motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 146/217
This model is called a contingency theory because it consists of three sets of contingencies—leader style, followers and situation, and the rewards to meet followers' needs. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qrwl7q293rq1qsua4808#QEPFWB2RLSA6XMN78133) Whereas the Fiedler theory made the assumption that new leaders could take over as situations change, in the path–goal theory, leaders change their behaviors to match the situation.
M. G. Evans, “Leadership,” in S. Kerr, ed., Organizational Behavior (Columbus, OH: Grid, 1974), pp. 230–233.
3-4a. Leader Behavior
The path–goal theory suggests a fourfold classi�ication of leader behaviors. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qrwl7q293rq1qsua4808#UHYTWWHYJYXTBZC0J432) These classi�ications are the types of behavior the leader can adopt and include supportive, directive, achievement-oriented, and participative styles.
Robert J. House and Terrence R. Mitchell, “Path–Goal Theory of Leadership,” Journal of Contemporary Business (Autumn 1974), pp. 81–97.
Supportive leadership shows concern for subordinates' well-being and personal needs. Leadership behavior is open, friendly, and approachable, and the leader creates a team climate and treats subordinates as equals. Supportive leadership is similar to the consideration or people-oriented leadership described earlier. An example is Jay Goltz, an entrepreneur who owns �ive small businesses in Chicago, who has always used supportive leadership. He has loaned money to employees, guaranteed car loans, helped several employees buy houses, and even bailed a couple of employees out of jail. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qrwl7q293rq1qsua4808#MAPFDVR6BR14LYTW1702)
Jay Goltz, “Are You a Kind Boss? Or Kind of a Boss?” (You're the Boss column), The New York Times (June 13, 2011), http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/13/are- you-a-kind-boss-or-kind-of-a-boss/ (http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/13/are-you-a-kind-boss-or-kind-of-a-boss/) (accessed March 15, 2013); and Jay Goltz, “Rethinking the Relationship Between Bosses and Employees,” The New York Times (December 22, 2014), http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/12/22/rethinking- the-relationship-between-bosses-and-employees/?_r=0 (http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/12/22/rethinking-the-relationship-between-bosses-and-employees/?_r=0) (accessed October 12, 2015).
“The boss drives people; the leader coaches them. The boss depends on authority; the leader on good will. The boss inspires fear; the leader inspires enthusiasm.”
H. Gordon Selfridge (1864–1947), founder of British retailer Selfridges.
Directive leadership tells subordinates exactly what they are supposed to do. Leader behavior includes planning, making schedules, setting performance goals and behavior standards, and stressing adherence to rules and regulations. Directive leadership behavior is similar to the initiating structure or task-oriented leadership style described earlier.
Participative leadership consults with subordinates about decisions. Leader behavior includes asking for opinions and suggestions, encouraging participation in decision making, and meeting with subordinates in their workplaces. The participative leader encourages group discussion and suggestions, similar to the coaching or supporting style in the Hersey and Blanchard model.
Achievement-oriented leadership sets clear and challenging goals for subordinates. Leader behavior stresses high-quality performance and improvement over current performance. Achievement-oriented leaders also show con�idence in subordinates and assist them in learning how to achieve high goals.
The four types of leader behavior are not considered ingrained personality traits as in the earlier trait theories; rather, they re�lect types of behavior that every leader is able to adopt, depending on the situation. Here's how Alan Robbins, founder of Plastic Lumber Company, shifted from a participative to a directive style and got better results from his employees.
In the Lead Alan Robbins, Plastic Lumber Company
Alan Robbins started Plastic Lumber Company because he saw a way to both help the planet and make money by converting plastic milk and soda bottles into fake lumber. He also had de�inite ideas about how to run a company. Robbins wanted to be both a boss and a friend to his employees. His leadership style stressed teamwork and participation, and Robbins spent a lot of time running ideas by workers on the factory �loor. However, he soon learned that most of his low-skilled workers didn't really want a chance to participate; they just wanted clear direction and consistent standards so that people knew what was expected of them.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 147/217
The degree of freedom Robbins allowed with his participative style actually led to some serious problems. Some workers were frequently absent or late without calling, showed up under the in�luence of alcohol or drugs, and started �ights on the factory �loor. Letting employees participate in decision making weakened Robbins's authority in many employees' eyes. Those who genuinely wanted to do a good job were frustrated by the lack of order and the fact that some employees seemed to get away with anything.
Even though Robbins had a natural tendency to be a participative leader, he shifted to a directive leadership style to try to restore some order. With a comprehensive rules and policy manual, drug testing for all workers, and clear standards of behavior, the work environment and employee performance at Plastic Lumber improved signi�icantly. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qrwl7q293rq1qsua4808#KTDM8ZNSE13RZ71TC721)
Timothy Aeppel, “Personnel Disorders Sap a Factory Owner of His Early Idealism,” The Wall Street Journal (January 14, 1998), pp. A1–A14.
Alan Robbins had believed his participative style would be appreciated by employees. However, employee satisfaction increased when he began using a directive style and specifying what was expected and what behaviors would not be tolerated. The directive style enabled people to focus on meeting performance standards by following clear procedures and guidelines. Thus, although Robbins would prefer to be participative, he realized it was not the best approach for the situation. The Consider This box provides an interesting perspective on the disadvantages of persisting in a behavior style despite the processes of change.
Consider This!
The phrase “too much of a good thing” is relevant in leadership. Behavior that becomes overbearing can be a disadvantage by ultimately resulting in the opposite of what the individual is hoping to achieve.
Polarities
All behavior consists of opposites or polarities. If I do anything more and more, over and over, its polarity will appear. For example, striving to be beautiful makes a person ugly, and trying too hard to be kind is a form of sel�ishness.
Any overdetermined behavior produces its opposite:
An obsession with living suggests worry about dying.
True simplicity is not easy.
Is it a long time or a short time since we last met?
The braggart probably feels small and insecure.
Who would be �irst ends up last.
Knowing how polarities work, the wise leader does not push to make things happen but allows a process to unfold on its own.
Source: John Heider, The Tao of Leadership: Leadership Strategies for a New Age (New York: Bantam Books, 1986), p. 3. Copyright 1985 Humanic Ltd., Atlanta, GA. Used with permission.
3-4b. Situational Contingencies
The two important situational contingencies in the path–goal theory are (1) the personal characteristics of group members and (2) the work environment. Personal characteristics of followers are similar to Hersey and Blanchard's readiness level and include such factors as ability, skills, needs, and motivations. For example, if an employee has a low level of ability or skill, the
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 148/217
leader may need to provide additional training or coaching in order for the worker to improve performance. If a subordinate is self-centered, the leader may use monetary rewards to motivate him or her. Subordinates who want or need clear direction and authority require a directive leader to tell them exactly what to do. Craft workers and professionals, however, may want more freedom and autonomy and work best under a participative leadership style.
The work environment contingencies include the degree of task structure, the nature of the formal authority system, and the work group itself. The task structure is similar to the same concept described in Fiedler's contingency theory; it includes the extent to which tasks are de�ined and have explicit job descriptions and work procedures. The formal authority system includes the amount of legitimate power used by leaders and the extent to which policies and rules constrain employees' behavior. Work-group characteristics consist of the educational level of subordinates and the quality of relationships among them.
3-4c. Use of Rewards
Recall that the leader's responsibility is to clarify the path to rewards for followers or to increase the amount or type of rewards to enhance satisfaction and job performance. In some situations, the leader works with subordinates to help them acquire the skills and con�idence needed to perform tasks and achieve rewards already available. In others, the leader may develop new rewards to meet the speci�ic needs of subordinates.
Exhibit 3.6 illustrates four examples of how leadership behavior is tailored to the situation. In the �irst situation, the subordinate lacks con�idence; thus, the supportive leadership style provides the social support with which to encourage the subordinate to undertake the behavior needed to do the work and receive the rewards. In the second situation, the job is ambiguous, and the employee is not performing effectively. Directive leadership behavior is used to give instructions and clarify the task so that the follower will know how to accomplish it and receive rewards. In the third situation, the subordinate is unchallenged by the task; thus, an achievement-oriented behavior is used to set higher goals. This clari�ies the path to rewards for the employee. In the fourth situation, an incorrect reward is given to a subordinate, and the participative leadership style is used to change this. By discussing the subordinate's needs, the leader is able to identify the correct reward for task accomplishment. In all four cases, the outcome of �itting the leadership behavior to the situation produces greater employee effort by either clarifying how subordinates can receive rewards or changing the rewards to �it their needs.
Exhibit 3.6. Path–Goal Situations and Preferred Leader Behaviors
Path–goal theorizing can be complex, but much of the research on it has been encouraging. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qrwl7q293rq1qsua4808#GPXUR1X6ZEK11XM52419) Using the model to specify precise relationships and make exact predictions about employee outcomes may be dif�icult, but the four types of leader behavior and the ideas for �itting them to situational contingencies provide a useful way for leaders to think about motivating subordinates.
Charles Greene, “Questions of Causation in the Path–Goal Theory of Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 22 (March 1979), pp. 22–41; and C. A. Schriesheim and Mary Ann von Glinow, “The Path–Goal Theory of Leadership: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis,” Academy of Management Journal 20 (1977), pp. 398–405.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 149/217
3-5. The Vroom–Jago Contingency Model The Vroom–Jago contingency model shares some basic principles with the previous models, yet it differs in signi�icant ways as well. This model focuses speci�ically on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation in�luences the quality and accountability of decisions. A number of situational factors shape the likelihood that either a participative or autocratic approach will produce the best outcome.
Vroom–Jago contingency model a contingency model that focuses on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation in�luences the quality and accountability of decisions
Vroom–Jago contingency model a contingency model that focuses on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation in�luences the quality and accountability of decisions
Vroom–Jago contingency model a contingency model that focuses on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation in�luences the quality and accountability of decisions
Vroom–Jago contingency model a contingency model that focuses on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation in�luences the quality and accountability of decisions
Vroom–Jago contingency model a contingency model that focuses on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation in�luences the quality and accountability of decisions
Vroom–Jago contingency model a contingency model that focuses on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation in�luences the quality and accountability of decisions
Vroom–Jago contingency model a contingency model that focuses on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation in�luences the quality and accountability of decisions
Vroom–Jago contingency model a contingency model that focuses on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation in�luences the quality and accountability of decisions
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 150/217
This model starts with the idea that a leader faces a problem that requires a solution. Decisions to solve the problem might be made by a leader alone or by the inclusion of a number of followers.
The Vroom–Jago model is very applied, which means that it tells the leader precisely the correct amount of participation by subordinates to use in making a particular decision. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/snamfchmgd7njn281249#CUYTPE3RELLGK84G3666) The model has three major components: leader participation styles, a set of diagnostic questions with which to analyze a decision situation, and a series of decision rules.
V. H. Vroom and Arthur G. Jago, The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988).
3-5a. Leader Participation Styles
The model employs �ive levels of subordinate participation in decision making, ranging from highly autocratic (leader decides alone) to highly democratic (leader delegates to group), as illustrated in Exhibit 3.7 . * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/snamfchmgd7njn281249#YAGXXE06YJWZPRJ9Z018) The exhibit shows �ive decision styles, starting with the leader making the decision alone (Decide); presenting the problem to subordinates individually for their suggestions and then making the decision (Consult Individually); presenting the problem to subordinates as a group, collectively obtaining their ideas and suggestions, then making the decision (Consult Group); sharing the problem with subordinates as a group and acting as a facilitator to help the group arrive at a decision (Facilitate); or delegating the problem and permitting the group to make the decision within prescribed limits (Delegate). The �ive styles fall along a continuum, and the leader should select one depending on the situation.
The following discussion is based heavily on Victor H. Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” Organizational Dynamics 28, no. 4 (Spring 2000), pp. 82–94.
Exhibit 3.7. Five Leader Decision Styles
Source: Reprinted from Organizational Dynamics , 28, no. 4, Victor H. Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” pp. 82–94, Copyright 2000, with permission from Elsevier.
Vroom–Jago contingency model a contingency model that focuses on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation in�luences the quality and accountability of decisions
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 151/217
3-5b. Diagnostic Questions
How does a leader decide which of the �ive decision styles to use? The appropriate degree of decision participation depends on a number of situational factors, such as the required level of decision quality, the level of leader or subordinate expertise, and the importance of having subordinates commit to the decision. Leaders can analyze the appropriate degree of participation by answering seven diagnostic questions.
1. Decision signi�icance : How signi�icant is this decision for the project or organization ? If the decision is highly important and a high-quality decision is needed for the success of the project or organization, the leader has to be actively involved.
2. Importance of commitment : How important is subordinate commitment to carrying out the decision ? If implementation requires a high level of commitment to the decision, leaders should involve subordinates in the decision process.
3. Leader expertise : What is the level of the leader's expertise in relation to the problem ? If the leader does not have a high amount of information, knowledge, or expertise, the leader should involve subordinates to obtain it.
4. Likelihood of commitment : If the leader were to make the decision alone, would subordinates have high or low commitment to the decision ? If subordinates typically go along with whatever the leader decides, their involvement in the decision-making process will be less important.
5. Group support for goals : What is the degree of subordinate support for the team's or organization's objectives at stake in this decision ? If subordinates have low support for the goals of the organization, the leader should not allow the group to make the decision alone.
6. Goal expertise : What is the level of group members' knowledge and expertise in relation to the problem ? If subordinates have a high level of expertise in relation to the problem, more responsibility for the decision can be delegated to them.
7. Team competence : How skilled and committed are group members to working together as a team to solve problems ? When subordinates have high skills and high desire to work together cooperatively to solve problems, more responsibility for the decision making can be delegated to them.
These questions seem detailed, but considering these seven situational factors can quickly narrow the options and point to the appropriate level of group participation in decision making.
3-5c. Selecting a Decision Style
Further development of the Vroom–Jago model added concern for time constraints and concern for follower development as explicit criteria for determining the level of participation. That is, a leader considers the relative importance of time versus follower development in selecting a decision style. This led to the development of two decision matrixes, a time-based model to be used if time is critical, for example if the organization is facing a crisis and a decision must be made immediately, and a development-based model to be used if time and ef�iciency are less important criteria than the opportunity to develop the thinking and decision-making skills of followers.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can use the Vroom–Jago model to determine the appropriate amount of follower participation to use in making a decision. You can follow the time-based guidelines when time is of the essence but use development-based guidelines when cultivating followers' decision-making skills is also important.
Consider the example of a small auto parts manufacturer, which owns only one machine for performing welds on muf�lers. If the machine has broken down and production has come to a standstill, a decision concerning the purchase of a new machine is critical and has to be made immediately to get the production line moving again. In this case, a leader would follow the time-
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 152/217
based model for selecting the decision style. However, if the machine is scheduled for routine replacement in three months, time is not a critical factor. The leader is then free to consider the importance of involving production workers in the decision making to develop their skills. Thus, the leader may follow the development-based model because time is not a critical concern.
Exhibit 3.8 and 3.9 illustrate the two decision matrixes—a timesaving-based model and an employee development–based model—that enable leaders to adopt a participation style by answering the diagnostic questions in sequence. Returning to the example of the welding machine, if the machine has broken down and must be replaced immediately, the leader would follow the timesaving-based model in Exhibit 3.8 . The leader enters the matrix at the left side, at Problem Statement. The matrix acts as a funnel as you move left to right, responding to the situational questions across the top, answering high (H) or low (L) to each one, and avoiding crossing any horizontal lines.
Exhibit 3.8. Timesaving-Based Model for Determining an Appropriate Decision-Making Style—Group Problems
Source: Reprinted from Organizational Dynamics , 28, no. 4, Victor H. Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” pp. 82–94, Copyright 2000, with permission from Elsevier.
Exhibit 3.9. Employee Development–Based Model for Determining an Appropriate Decision-Making Style—Group Problems
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 153/217
Source: Victor H. Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” Organizational Dynamics 28, no. 4 (Spring 2000), pp. 82–94. This is Vroom's adaptation of Tannenbaum and Schmidt's Taxonomy.
The �irst question (decision signi�icance) would be: How signi�icant is this decision for the project or organization ? If the answer is High, the leader proceeds to importance of commitment: How important is subordinate commitment to carrying out the decision ? If the answer is High, the next question pertains to leader expertise: What is the level of the leader's expertise in relation to the problem ? If the leader's knowledge and expertise are High, the leader next considers likelihood of commitment: If the leader were to make the decision alone, how likely is it that subordinates would be committed to the decision ? If there is a high likelihood that subordinates would be committed, the decision matrix leads directly to the Decide style of decision making, in which the leader makes the decision alone and presents it to the group.
As noted earlier, this matrix assumes that time and ef�iciency are the most important criteria. However, consider how the selection of a decision style would differ if the leader had several months to replace the welding machine and considered follower development of high importance and time of little concern. In this case, the leader would follow the employee development–driven decision matrix in Exhibit 3.9 . Beginning again at the left side of the matrix: How signi�icant is this decision for the project or organization ? If the answer is High, proceed to importance of commitment: How important is subordinate commitment ? If high, the next question concerns likelihood of commitment (leader expertise is not considered because the development model is focused on involving subordinates, even if the leader has knowledge and expertise): If the leader were to make the decision alone, how likely is it that subordinates would be committed to the decision ? If there is a high likelihood, the leader next considers group support: What is the degree of subordinate support for the team's or organization's objectives at stake in this decision ? If the degree of support for goals is low, the leader proceeds directly to the Group Consult decision style. However, if the degree of support for goals is high, the leader then asks: What is the level of group members' knowledge and expertise in relation to the problem ? An answer of High would take the leader to the question: How skilled and committed are group members to working together as a team to solve problems ? An answer of High would lead to the Delegate style, in which the leader allows the group to make the decision within certain limits.
Note that the timesaving-driven model takes the leader to the �irst decision style that preserves decision quality and follower acceptance, whereas the employee development–driven model takes other considerations into account. It takes less time to make an autocratic decision (Decide) than to involve subordinates by using a Facilitate or Delegate style. However, in many cases, time and ef�iciency are less important than the opportunity to foster subordinate development. In many of today's organizations, where knowledge sharing and widespread participation are considered critical to organizational success, leaders are placing greater emphasis on follower development when time is not a critical issue.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 154/217
Leaders can quickly learn to use the model to adapt their styles to �it the situation. However, researchers have also developed a computer-based program that allows for greater complexity and precision in the Vroom–Jago model and incorporates the value of time and value of follower development as situational factors rather than portraying them in separate decision matrixes.
The Vroom–Jago model has been criticized as being less than perfect, * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/snamfchmgd7njn281249#EUAPUGE5PGQA0V4SJ752) but it is useful to decision makers, and the model is supported by research. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/snamfchmgd7njn281249#HMPPHTJUN715GUVS9865) Leaders can learn to use the model to make timely, high-quality decisions. Let's try applying the model to the following problem.
R. H. G. Field, “A Test of the Vroom–Yetton Normative Model of Leadership,” Journal of Applied Psychology (October 1982), pp. 523–532; and R. H. G. Field, “A Critique of the Vroom–Yetton Contingency Model of Leadership Behavior,” Academy of Management Review 4 (1979), pp. 249–251.
Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process”; Jennifer T. Ettling and Arthur G. Jago, “Participation Under Conditions of Con�lict: More on the Validity of the Vroom–Yetton Model,” Journal of Management Studies 25 (1988), pp. 73–83; Madeline E. Heilman, Harvey A. Hornstein, Jack H. Cage, and Judith K. Herschlag, “Reactions to Prescribed Leader Behavior as a Function of Role Perspective: The Case of the Vroom–Yetton Model,” Journal of Applied Psychology (February 1984), pp. 50–60; and Arthur G. Jago and Victor H. Vroom, “Some Differences in the Incidence and Evaluation of Participative Leader Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology (December 1982), pp. 776–783.
In the Lead Art Weinstein, Whitlock Manufacturing
When Whitlock Manufacturing won a contract from a large auto manufacturer to produce an engine to power its �lagship sports car, Art Weinstein was thrilled to be selected as project manager. The engine, of Japanese design and extremely complex, has gotten rave reviews in the automotive press. This project has dramatically enhanced the reputation of Whitlock Manufacturing, which was previously known primarily as a producer of outboard engines for marine use.
Weinstein and his team of engineers have taken great pride in their work on the project, but their excitement was dashed by a recent report of serious engine problems in cars delivered to customers. Fourteen owners of cars produced during the �irst month had experienced engine seizures. Taking quick action, the auto manufacturer suspended sales of the sports car, halted current production, and noti�ied owners of the current model not to drive the car. Everyone involved knows this is a disaster. Unless the engine problem is solved quickly, Whitlock Manufacturing could be exposed to extended litigation. In addition, Whitlock's valued relationship with one of the world's largest auto manufacturers would probably be lost forever.
As the person most knowledgeable about the engine, Weinstein has spent two weeks in the �ield inspecting the seized engines and the auto plant where they were installed. In addition, he has carefully examined the operations and practices in Whitlock's plant where the engine is manufactured. Based on this extensive research, Weinstein is convinced that he knows what the problem is and the best way to solve it. However, his natural inclination is to involve other team members as much as possible in making decisions and solving problems. He not only values their input, but he also thinks that by encouraging greater participation he strengthens the thinking skills of team members, helping them grow and contribute more to the team and the organization. Therefore, Weinstein chooses to consult with his team before making his �inal decision.
The group meets for several hours that afternoon, discussing the problem in detail and sharing their varied perspectives, including the information Weinstein has gathered during his research. Following the group session, Weinstein makes his decision. He will present the decision at the team meeting the following morning, after which testing and correction of the engine problem will begin. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/snamfchmgd7njn281249#PDEV2TD03T3TS7U5A722)
Based on a decision problem presented in Victor H. Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” Organizational Dynamics 28, no. 4 (Spring, 2000), pp. 82–94.
In the Whitlock Manufacturing case, either a timesaving-based or an employee development–based model can be used to select a decision style. Although timeliness is important, the leader's desire to involve subordinates can be considered equally important. Do you think Weinstein used the correct leader decision style? Let's examine the problem using the employee development–based decision tree since Weinstein is concerned about involving other team members. Moving from left to right in Exhibit 3.9 , the questions and answers are as follows: How signi�icant is this decision for the organization ? De�initely High. Quality of the decision is of critical importance. The company's future may be at stake. How important is subordinate
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 155/217
commitment to carrying out the decision ? Also High. The team members must support and implement Weinstein's solution. Question 3 (leader expertise) is not considered in the employee development–driven model, as shown in Exhibit 3.9 . The next question would be If Weinstein makes the decision on his own, will team members have high or low commitment to it ? The answer to this question is probably also High. Team members respect Weinstein, and they are likely to accept his analysis of the problem. This leads to the question What is the degree of subordinate support for the team's or organization's objectives at stake in this decision ? The answer, de�initely High, leads to the question What is the level of group members' knowledge and expertise in relation to the problem ? The answer to this question is probably Low, which leads to the Consult Group decision style. Thus, Weinstein used the style that would be recommended by the Vroom–Jago model.
Now, assume that Weinstein chose to place more emphasis on ef�icient use of time than on employee involvement and development. Using the timesaving-based decision matrix in Exhibit 3.8 , answer the questions across the top of the matrix based on the information just provided (rate Weinstein's level of expertise in question 3 as high). Remember to avoid crossing any horizontal lines. What decision style is recommended? Is it the same as or different from that recommended by the employee development–based tree?
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 156/217
3-6. Substitutes for Leadership The contingency leadership approaches considered so far have focused on the leader's style, the followers' nature, and the situation's characteristics. The �inal contingency approach suggests that situational variables can be so powerful that they actually substitute for or neutralize the need for leadership. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qbqyy7q1qu3wshlwl737#JMND5V6900ZZPM79E410) This approach outlines those organizational settings in which task-oriented and people-oriented leadership styles are unimportant or unnecessary.
S. Kerr and J. M. Jermier, “Substitutes for Leadership: Their Meaning and Measurement,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 22 (1978), pp. 375–403; and Jon P. Howell and Peter W. Dorfman, “Leadership and Substitutes for Leadership among Professional and Nonprofessional Workers,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 22 (1986), pp. 29–46.
Exhibit 3.10 shows the situational variables that tend to substitute for or neutralize leadership characteristics. A Substitute for leadership makes the leadership style unnecessary or redundant. For example, highly educated, professional subordinates who know how to do their tasks do not need a leader who initiates structure for them and tells them what to do. In addition, long- term education often develops autonomous, self-motivated individuals. Thus, task-oriented and people-oriented leadership is substituted by professional education and socialization. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qbqyy7q1qu3wshlwl737#GKYH1M388F8H528GR238)
Substitute a situational variable that makes leadership unnecessary or redundant
Substitute a situational variable that makes leadership unnecessary or redundant
Substitute a situational variable that makes leadership unnecessary or redundant
Substitute a situational variable that makes leadership unnecessary or redundant
Substitute a situational variable that makes leadership unnecessary or redundant
Substitute a situational variable that makes leadership unnecessary or redundant
Substitute a situational variable that makes leadership unnecessary or redundant
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 157/217
J. P. Howell, D. E. Bowen, P. W. Doreman, S. Kerr, and P. M. Podsakoff, “Substitutes for Leadership: Effective Alternatives to Ineffective Leadership,” Organizational Dynamics (Summer 1990), pp. 21–38.
Exhibit 3.10. Substitutes and Neutralizers for Leadership
Variable Task-Oriented Leadership People-Oriented Leadership Organizational variables
Group cohesiveness
Formalization
In�lexibility
Low position power
Substitutes for
Substitutes for
Neutralizes
Neutralizes
Substitutes for
No effect on
No effect on
Neutralizes
Task characteristics Highly structured task
Automatic feedback
Intrinsic satisfaction
Substitutes for
Substitutes for
No effect on
No effect on
No effect on
Substitutes for
Follower characteristics Professionalism
Training/experience
Low value of rewards
Substitutes for
Substitutes for
Neutralizes
Substitutes for
No effect on
Neutralizes
Daniel Snyder, owner of the Washington Redskins football team, discovered that his strong task-oriented approach with his professional, talented coaches was counterproductive.
At the Washington Redskins, the skills, training, experience, and professionalism of coaches substituted for a task-oriented leadership style of the owner and also made a people-oriented style less important. Daniel Snyder decided to stay on the sidelines and let his coaches and players make the decisions on the �ield.
Unlike a substitute, a neutralizer counteracts the leadership style and prevents the leader from displaying certain behaviors. For example, if a leader is physically removed from subordinates, the leader's ability to give directions to subordinates is greatly reduced. FedEx Of�ice (formerly Kinko's) provides an example. With numerous locations widely scattered across regions, regional managers have very limited personal interaction with store managers and employees. Thus, their ability to both support and direct is neutralized.
Substitute a situational variable that makes leadership unnecessary or redundant
neutralizer a situational characteristic that counteracts the leadership style and prevents the leader from displaying certain behaviors
neutralizer
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 158/217
In the Lead Daniel Snyder, Washington Redskins
For many of Daniel Snyder's 15 or so years as owner of the Washington Redskins, he had a reputation as a meddlesome, overbearing boss who got in the way of people doing their jobs. He got involved in every detail of the team, even making big decisions on player acquisition himself.
But Snyder has proven that leaders can change. “He's stepped back from it,” one insider says. “And he's having more fun because of it.” Some associates say Snyder �inally was able to step back because he got tired of all the losses the team racked up—and the criticism he got from fans and the media because of them.
When Snyder started staying in the background, the team seemed to get better. In 2012, the Redskins won their �irst NFC East division title since 1999, Snyder's �irst season as owner. “I think he deserves a lot of credit,” said former general manager Charley Casserly, whom Snyder �ired in 1999. “He's allowed them to do their jobs. They've turned the franchise
a situational characteristic that counteracts the leadership style and prevents the leader from displaying certain behaviors
neutralizer a situational characteristic that counteracts the leadership style and prevents the leader from displaying certain behaviors
neutralizer a situational characteristic that counteracts the leadership style and prevents the leader from displaying certain behaviors
neutralizer a situational characteristic that counteracts the leadership style and prevents the leader from displaying certain behaviors
neutralizer a situational characteristic that counteracts the leadership style and prevents the leader from displaying certain behaviors
neutralizer a situational characteristic that counteracts the leadership style and prevents the leader from displaying certain behaviors
neutralizer a situational characteristic that counteracts the leadership style and prevents the leader from displaying certain behaviors
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 159/217
around and made it a winner again.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qbqyy7q1qu3wshlwl737#VNFM66G27HM1SJX79428)
Mark Maske, “Daniel Snyder, Washington Redskins Owner, Adopts Hands-Off Role—and Team Wins,” The Washington Post (January 4, 2013), http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-04/sports/36209112_1_daniel-snyder-washington-redskins-redskins-park (http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-04/sports/36209112_1_daniel-snyder-washington-redskins-redskins-park) (accessed March 15, 2013).
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can avoid leadership overkill. Adopt a style that is complementary to the organizational situation to ensure that both task needs and people needs are met.
Situational variables in Exhibit 3.10 include characteristics of the followers, the task, and the organization itself. For example, when subordinates are highly professional, such as research scientists in companies like Merck or Monsanto, both leadership styles are less important. The employees do not need either direction or support. With respect to task characteristics, highly structured tasks substitute for a task-oriented style, and a satisfying task substitutes for a people-oriented style.
When a task is highly structured and routine, like auditing cash, the leader should provide personal consideration and support that is not provided by the task. Satis�ied people don't need as much consideration. Likewise, with respect to the organization itself, group cohesiveness substitutes for both leader styles. For example, the relationship that develops among air traf�ic controllers and jet �ighter pilots is characterized by high-stress interactions and continuous peer training. This cohesiveness provides support and direction that substitute for formal leadership. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qbqyy7q1qu3wshlwl737#FGXLG658VMWT7MEQ5502) Formalized rules and procedures substitute for leader task orientation because the rules tell people what to do. Physical separation of leader and subordinate neutralizes both leadership styles.
Howell et al., “Substitutes for Leadership: Effective Alternatives.”
New Leader Action Memo
Measure how the task characteristics of your job or a job you've held in the past might act as substitutes for leadership by answering the questions in Leader's Self-Insight 3.3 .
The value of the situations described in Exhibit 3.10 is that they help leaders avoid leadership overkill. Leaders should adopt a style with which to complement the organizational situation. For example, the work situation for bank tellers provides a high level of formalization, little �lexibility, and a highly structured task. The head teller should not adopt a task-oriented style because the organization already provides structure and direction. The head teller should concentrate on a people-oriented style. In other organizations, if group cohesiveness or previous training meets employee social needs, the leader is free to concentrate on task-oriented behaviors. The leader can adopt a style complementary to the organizational situation to ensure that both task needs and people needs of followers are met.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can use a people-oriented style when tasks are highly structured and followers are bound by formal rules and procedures. You can adopt a task-oriented style if group cohesiveness and followers' intrinsic job satisfaction meet their social and emotional needs.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 160/217
Studies have examined how substitutes (the situation) can be designed to have more impact than leader behaviors on outcomes such as subordinate satisfaction. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qbqyy7q1qu3wshlwl737#QRDVLMDGE6WH863V6895) The impetus behind this research is the idea that substitutes for leadership can be designed into organizations in ways to complement existing leadership, act in the absence of leadership, and otherwise provide more comprehensive leadership alternatives. For example, Paul Reeves, a foreman at Harmon Auto Parts, shared half-days with his subordinates during which they helped him perform his leader tasks. After Reeves's promotion to middle management, his group no longer required a foreman. Followers were trained to act on their own. * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/qbqyy7q1qu3wshlwl737#NUYMHDFYQS5JWGRPA166) Thus, a situation in which follower ability and training were highly developed created a substitute for leadership.
P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, and W. H. Bommer, “Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Behaviors,” Journal of Management 22, no. 2 (1996), pp. 259–298.
Howell et al., “Substitutes for Leadership.”
Leader's Self-Insight 3.3. Measuring Substitutes for Leadership
Instructions : Think about your current job or a job you have held in the past. Please answer whether each of the following items is Mostly False or Mostly True for you in that job.
Mostly False Mostly True 1. Because of the nature of the tasks I perform, there is little doubt about the best
way to do them.
2. My job duties are so simple that almost anyone could perform them well after a little instruction.
3. It is dif�icult to �igure out the best way to do many of my tasks and activities. 4. There is really only one correct way to perform most of the tasks I do. 5. After I've completed a task, I can tell right away from the results I get whether I
have performed it correctly.
6. My job is the kind where you can �inish a task and not know if you've made a mistake or error.
7. Because of the nature of the tasks I do, it is easy for me to see when I have done something exceptionally well.
8. I get lots of satisfaction from the work I do. 9. It is hard to imagine that anyone could enjoy performing the tasks I have
performed on my job.
10. My job satisfaction depends primarily on the nature of the tasks and activities I perform.
Scoring and Interpretation
For your task structure score, give yourself one point for Mostly True answers to items 1, 2, and 4, and for a Mostly False answer to item 3. This is your score for Task Structure: ______
For your task feedback score, give yourself one point for Mostly True answers to items 5 and 7, and for a Mostly False answer to item 6. This is your score for Task Feedback: ______
For your intrinsic satisfaction score, score one point for Mostly True answers to items 8 and 10, and for a Mostly False answer to item 9. This is your score for Intrinsic Satisfaction: ______
A high score (3 or 4) for Task Structure or Task Feedback indicates a high potential for those elements to act as a substitute for task-oriented leadership . A high score (3) for Intrinsic Satisfaction indicates the potential to be a substitute
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 161/217
for people-oriented leadership . Does your leader adopt a style that is complementary to the task situation, or is the leader guilty of leadership overkill ? How can you apply this understanding to your own actions as a leader?
Source: Based on “Questionnaire Items for the Measurement of Substitutes for Leadership,” Table 2 in Steven Kerr and John M. Jermier, “Substitutes for Leadership: Their Meaning and Measurement,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 22 (1978), pp. 375–403.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can provide minimal task direction and personal support to highly trained employees; followers' professionalism and intrinsic satisfaction substitute for both task- and people-oriented leadership.
The ability to use substitutes to �ill leadership “gaps” is often advantageous to organizations. Indeed, the fundamental assumption of substitutes-for-leadership researchers is that effective leadership is the ability to recognize and provide the support and direction not already provided by task, group, and organization.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 162/217
Leadership Essentials The most important point in this chapter is that situational variables affect leadership outcomes. The contingency approaches were developed to systematically address the relationship between a leader and the organization. The contingency approaches focus on how the components of leadership style, subordinate characteristics, and situational elements affect one another. Hersey and Blanchard's situational theory, Fiedler's contingency model, the path–goal theory, the Vroom–Jago model, and the substitutes-for-leadership concept each examine how different situations call for different styles of leadership behavior.
Hersey and Blanchard contend that leaders can adjust their task or relationship style to accommodate the readiness level of their subordinates. According to Fiedler, leaders can determine whether their leadership style is suitable for the situation. Task-oriented leaders tend to do better in very favorable or very unfavorable situations, whereas relationship-oriented leaders do best in situations of intermediate favorability. The path–goal theory states that leaders can use a style that appropriately clari�ies the path to desired rewards. The Vroom–Jago model indicates that leaders can choose a participative decision style based on contingencies such as quality requirement, commitment requirement, or the leader's knowledge and expertise. In addition, concern for time (the need for a fast decision) versus concern for follower development is taken into account. Finally, the substitutes-for-leadership concept recommends that leaders adjust their style to provide resources not otherwise provided in the organizational situation.
By discerning the characteristics of tasks, subordinates, and organizations, leaders can determine the style that increases the likelihood of successful leadership outcomes. Therefore, effective leadership depends partly on developing diagnostic skills and being �lexible in your leadership behavior.
Discussion Questions 1. Consider Fiedler's theory as illustrated in Exhibit 3.4 . How often do you think very favorable, intermediate, or very unfavorable situations occur to leaders in real life? Discuss.
2. Do you think leadership style is �ixed and unchangeable, or can leaders be �lexible and adaptable with respect to style? Why?
3. Consider the leadership position of the managing partner in a law �irm. What task, subordinate, and organizational factors might serve as substitutes for leadership in this situation?
4. Compare Fiedler's contingency model with the path–goal theory. What are the similarities and differences? Which do you prefer?
5. If you were a �irst-level supervisor of a team of telemarketers, how would you go about assessing the readiness level of your subordinates? Do you think most leaders can easily shift their leadership style to suit the readiness level of followers?
6. Think back to teachers you have had, and identify one each who �its a supportive style, directive style, participative style, and achievement-oriented style according to the path–goal theory. Which style did you �ind most effective? Why?
7. Do you think leaders should decide on a participative style based on the most ef�icient way to reach the decision? Should leaders sometimes let people participate for other reasons?
8. Consider the situational characteristics of group cohesiveness, organizational formalization, and physical separation. How might each of these substitute for or neutralize task-oriented or people-oriented leadership? Explain.
Leadership at Work
Task versus Relationship Role Play
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 163/217
You are the new distribution manager for French Grains Bakery. Five drivers who deliver French Grains baked goods to grocery stores in the metropolitan area report to you. The drivers are expected to complete the delivery report to keep track of actual deliveries and any changes that occur. The delivery report is a key element in inventory control and provides the data for French Grains invoicing of grocery stores. Errors become excessive when drivers fail to complete the report each day, especially when store managers request different inventory when the driver arrives. As a result, French Grains may not be paid for several loaves of bread a day for each mistake in the delivery report. The result is lost revenue and poor inventory control.
One of the drivers accounts for about 60 percent of the errors in the delivery reports. This driver is a nice person and generally reliable, although he is occasionally late for work. His major problem is that he falls behind in his paperwork. A second driver accounts for about 30 percent of the errors, and a third driver for about 10 percent of the errors. The other two drivers turn in virtually error-free delivery reports.
You are a high task-oriented (and low relationship-oriented) leader and have decided to talk to the drivers about doing a more complete and accurate job with the delivery reports. Write below exactly how you will go about correcting this problem as a task-oriented leader. Will you meet with drivers individually or in a group? When and where will you meet with them? Exactly what will you say, and how will you get them to listen?
Now adopt the role of a high relationship-oriented (and low task-oriented) leader. Write below exactly what you will do and say as a relationship-oriented distribution manager. Will you meet with the drivers individually or in a group? What will you say, and how will you get them to listen?
In Class: The instructor can ask students to volunteer to play the roles of the distribution manager and the drivers. A few students can take turns role-playing the distribution manager in front of the class to show how they would handle the drivers as task- and relationship-oriented leaders. The instructor can ask other students for feedback on the leader's effectiveness and on which approach seems more effective for this situation and why.
Source: Based on K. J. Keleman, J. E. Garcia, and K. J. Lovelace, Management Incidents: Role Plays for Management Development (Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company, 1990), pp. 69–72.
Leadership Development: Cases for Analysis
Alvis Corporation
Kevin McCarthy is the manager of a production department in Alvis Corporation, a �irm that manufactures of�ice equipment. After reading an article that stressed the bene�its of participative management, Kevin believes that these bene�its could be realized in his department if the workers are allowed to participate in making some decisions that affect them. The workers are not unionized. Kevin selected two decisions for his experiment in participative management.
The �irst decision involved vacation schedules. Each summer the workers are given two weeks' vacation, but no more than two workers can go on vacation at the same time. In prior years, Kevin made this decision himself. He would �irst ask the workers to indicate their preferred dates, and he considered how the work would be affected if different people were out at the same time. It was important to plan a vacation schedule that would ensure adequate staf�ing for all of the essential operations performed by the department. When more than two workers wanted the same time period and they had similar skills, he usually gave preference to the workers with the highest productivity.
The second decision involved production standards. Sales had been increasing steadily over the past few years, and the company recently installed some new equipment to increase productivity. The new equipment would allow Kevin's department to produce more with the same number of workers. The company had a pay incentive system in which workers received a piece rate for each unit produced above a standard amount. Separate standards existed for each type of product, based on an industrial engineering study conducted a few years earlier. Top management wanted to readjust the production standards to re�lect the fact that the new equipment made it possible for the workers to earn more without working any harder. The savings from higher productivity were needed to help pay for the new equipment.
Kevin called a meeting of his 15 workers an hour before the end of the workday. He explained that he wanted them to discuss the two issues and make recommendations. Kevin �igured that the workers might be inhibited about participating in the discussion if he were present, so he left them alone to discuss the issues. Besides, Kevin had an appointment to meet with the quality control manager. Quality problems had increased after the new equipment was installed, and the industrial engineers were studying the problem in an attempt to determine why quality had gotten worse rather than better.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 164/217
When Kevin returned to his department just at quitting time, he was surprised to learn that the workers recommended keeping the standards the same. He had assumed they knew the pay incentives were no longer fair and would set a higher standard. The spokesman for the group explained that their base pay had not kept up with in�lation and the higher incentive pay restored their real income to its prior level.
On the vacation issue, the group was deadlocked. Several of the workers wanted to take their vacations during the same two- week period and could not agree on who should go. Some workers argued that they should have priority because they had more seniority, whereas others argued that priority should be based on productivity, as in the past. Since it was quitting time, the group concluded that Kevin would have to resolve the dispute himself. After all, wasn't that what he was being paid for? * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/x�lwm4adak4qbe4ad645#EHTLJ897QQ4BJQF0F823)
Reprinted with permission from Gary Yukl, Leadership in Organizations , 7th ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2010), pp. 119–120.
Questions 1. Analyze this situation using the Hersey–Blanchard model and the Vroom–Jago model. What do these models suggest as the appropriate leadership or decision style? Explain.
2. Evaluate Kevin McCarthy's leadership style before and during his experiment in participative management.
3. If you were Kevin McCarthy, what would you do now? Why?
An Impossible Dream?
What's wrong with the team? What's wrong with the team ? Zequine Mansell's words repeated over and over in Allen Block's head as he boarded the plane from Los Angeles to Chicago.
Block was responsible for the technical implementation of the new customer relationship management (CRM) software being installed for western and eastern sales of�ices in both cities. The software was badly needed to improve follow-up sales for his company, Exert Systems. Exert sold exercise equipment to high schools and colleges, as well as to small and midsized businesses for recreation centers, through a national force of 310 salespeople. The company's low prices won a lot of sales; however, follow-up service was uneven, and the new CRM system promised to resolve those problems with historical data, inquiries, reminders, and updates going to sales reps daily. The CEO of Exert ordered the CRM system installed with all possible haste.
Block pulled a yellow pad and pen from the side pocket of his carry-on bag and tossed it in the seat beside the window, stashed the bag in the overhead compartment, and sat down as other passengers �iled past. In an effort to shut out his thoughts, he closed his eyes and concentrated on the muf�led voices and low whooshing sound of the air vents. An image appeared in his mind of his promotion to Mansell's job when she retired in two years. He blocked that thought and started doodling on the pad as a way of focusing his thoughts.
He wrote what's wrong with the team three times and began drawing arrows to circles bearing the names of his team members: Barry Livingston and Max Wojohowski in Los Angeles and Bob Finley, Lynne Johnston, and Sally Phillips in Chicago. He marked through Sally's name. She had jumped ship recently, taking her less-than-stellar but much-needed talents with her to another company. It was on a previous LA–Chicago �light that Sally had pumped him for feedback on her future with Exert. She had informed him that she had another job offer. She admitted it was less money, but she was feeling under pressure as a member of the team and she wanted more “quality of life.” Block told Sally bluntly that her technical expertise, on which he placed top importance, was slightly below that of her peers, so future promotion was less likely despite her impressive people and team skills.
He wrote “quality of life,” circled it, and then crossed it out and wrote “what the hell?” Why should she get quality of life? he mused. I've barely seen my wife and kids since this project started . Block's team was under a great deal of pressure, and he had needed Sally to stick it out. He told her so, but the plane had barely touched down when she went directly to the of�ice and quit, leaving the team short-handed and too close to deadline to add another body.
What's wrong with the team ? Block furiously scribbled as his thoughts raced: (1) The deadline is ridiculously short . Mansell had scheduled a 10-week completion deadline for the new CRM software, including installation and training for both cities.
He was interrupted by the stewardess. “Would you care for a drink, sir?”
“Yes. Just water.”
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 165/217
Block took a sip and continued to write. (2) Thank God for LA . From the outset, Barry and Max had worked feverishly while avoiding the whining and complaining that seemed to overwhelm members of the Chicago team. The atmosphere was different. Although the project moved forward, meeting deadlines, there appeared to be less stress. The LA guys focused tirelessly on work, with no families to consider, alternating intense work with joking around. “Those are my kind of people,” he thought. (3) But there is Chicago , he wrote. Earlier in the day Sam Matheny from sales had e-mailed, then called Block to tell him the two remaining members of the Chicago team appeared to be alternating between bickering and avoiding one another. Apparently this had been going on for some time. What's with that ? Block wondered. And why did Sam know and I didn't ? So that morning, before his �light, Block had to make time to call and text both Finley and Johnston. Finley admitted he had overreacted to Johnston.
“Look, man. I'm tired and stressed out. We've been working non-stop. My wife is not happy.”
“Just get along until this project is completed,” Block ordered.
“When will that be?” Finley asked before hanging up.
Block thought about Mansell's persistent complaints to him that the team appeared to have a lack of passion, and she admonished him to “get your people to understand the urgency of this project.” Her complaints only added to his own stress level. He had long considered himself the frontrunner for Mansell's job when she retired in two years. But had his team ruined that dream? The sense of urgency could be measured now in the level of stress and the long hours they had all endured. He admitted his team members were unenthusiastic, but they seemed committed.
Is it too late to turn around and restore the level of teamwork ? He tore off the sheet from the pad, crumpled it in his hand, and stared out the window.
Questions 1. How would you characterize Block's leadership approach (task versus people)? What approach do you think is correct for this situation? Why?
2. What would you do now if you were Block? How might you awaken more enthusiasm in your team for completing this project on time? Specify the steps you would take.
3. How would you suggest that Block modify his leadership style if he wants to succeed Mansell in two years? Be speci�ic.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 166/217
Part 3. The Personal Side of Leadership
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 167/217
Chapter 4. The Leader as an Individual
Your Leadership Challenge After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
Understand the importance of self-awareness and how to recognize your blind spots. Identify major personality dimensions and understand how personality in�luences leadership and relationships within organizations. Clarify your instrumental and end values and recognize how values guide thoughts and behavior. De�ine attitudes and explain their relationship to leader behavior. Explain attributions and recognize how perception affects the leader–follower relationship. Recognize individual differences in cognitive style and broaden your own thinking style to expand leadership potential. Understand how to lead and work with people with varied personality traits.
Nancy Dubec's �irst formal leadership job was as head of development at cable network A&E. Now that she's CEO of A&E Networks, which encompasses A&E, Lifetime, HISTORY, FYI and H2, as well as a number of other divisions, she still applies some of the lessons she learned in that job. “I suddenly had eight people reporting to me, and I had to let some of them go,” Dubec says. Dubec realized she had a natural competitive streak and an instinctive drive to win and create. She also realized that some people thrive in that type of environment and some don't. The ability to look at each person as an individual with different needs, interests, personalities, skills, and styles helped Dubec rise to the top and have a big impact at A&E. She thinks building the best team requires a mix of styles and skills. “I'm a big believer in the idea that people tend to fall into one of three groups—you're either a thinker, a doer, or a feeler,” she says, pointing out that the right balance of the three is essential for high team performance. Dubec says she is more of a doer so she is careful to make sure she has thinkers and feelers on her team and respects their approaches. “When you put the different kinds of people together in the right way, that can be very powerful,” she says. “You never want that out of balance.”* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/uhwul04s70dm6k3w5380#EDYC3Q7ZCT0QP2Q2U778)
Adam Bryant, “Nancy Dubec of A&E: Mixing Doers, Thinkers and Feelers” (Corner Of�ice column), The New York Times (March 19, 2015), http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/business/nancy-dubuc-of-ae-mixing-doers-thinkers-and-feelers.html?_r=0 (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/business/nancy-dubuc-of-ae-mixing-doers-thinkers-and-feelers.html?_r=0) (accessed October 13, 2015).
Leaders' ability to understand their own personalities and attitudes, as well as their ability to understand individual differences among employees, can profoundly affect leadership effectiveness. Many of today's organizations use personality and other psychometric tests as a way to help people better understand themselves and relate to one another. In Chapter 2, we examined some traits, individual qualities, and behaviors that are thought to be consistent with effective leadership. Chapter 3 examined contingency theories of leadership, which consider the relationship between leader activities and the situations in which they occur, including followers and the environment. Clearly, organizational leadership is both an individual and an organizational phenomenon. In this chapter, we explore individual differences in more depth and examine how variations in personality, attitudes, values, and so forth in�luence the leader–follower relationship.
We begin by considering the importance of leaders knowing themselves, and we look at some potential blind spots leaders may have that limit their understanding and effectiveness. Next, we examine personality and some leader-related personality dimensions. Then the chapter considers how values affect leadership and the ways in which a leader's attitudes in�luence behavior. We also explore the role of perception, discuss attributions, and look at cognitive differences, including a discussion of thinking and decision-making styles and the concept of brain dominance. Finally, the chapter considers a few techniques for working with different personality types.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 168/217
4-1. The Secret Ingredient for Leadership Success A survey of 75 members of the Stanford Graduate School of Business's Advisory Council revealed the nearly unanimous answer to a question about the most important capability for leaders to develop: self-awareness.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#MEGHH8NWZKWGBXGUV633) Self- awareness means being aware of the internal aspects of one's nature, such as personality traits, emotions, values, attitudes, and perceptions, and appreciating how your patterns affect other people.
Reported in William W. George, Peter Sims, Andrew N. MacLean, David Mayer, and Diana Mayer, “Discovering Your Authentic Leadership,” Harvard Business Review (February 2007), pp. 129–138.
4-1a. The Importance of Self-Awareness
Most leadership experts agree that a primary characteristic of effective leaders is that they know who they are and what they stand for.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#FXGYCKFC29T5AKDAA920) When leaders deeply understand themselves, they remain grounded and constant, so that people know what to expect from them.
Self-awareness being conscious of the internal aspects of one's nature, such as personality traits, emotions, values, attitudes, and perceptions, and appreciating how your patterns affect other people
Self-awareness being conscious of the internal aspects of one's nature, such as personality traits, emotions, values, attitudes, and perceptions, and appreciating how your patterns affect other people
Self-awareness being conscious of the internal aspects of one's nature, such as personality traits, emotions, values, attitudes, and perceptions, and appreciating how your patterns affect other people
Self-awareness being conscious of the internal aspects of one's nature, such as personality traits, emotions, values, attitudes, and perceptions, and appreciating how your patterns affect other people
Self-awareness being conscious of the internal aspects of one's nature, such as personality traits, emotions, values, attitudes, and perceptions, and appreciating how your patterns affect other people
Self-awareness being conscious of the internal aspects of one's nature, such as personality traits, emotions, values, attitudes, and perceptions, and appreciating how your patterns affect other people
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 169/217
Bill George, “Leadership Skills: It Starts with Self-Awareness,” Leadership Excellence (June 2011), p. 13; Tricia Bisoux, “What Makes Leaders Great” (interviews with leadership experts), BizEd (September–October 2005), pp. 40–45; Warren Bennis, Why Leaders Can't Lead (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989); Daniel Goleman, “What Makes a Leader?” Harvard Business Review (November–December 1998), p. 93ff; and Richard E. Boyatzis, The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance (New York: Wiley, 1982).
Yet being self-aware is easier said than done. When Charlotte Beers, former chairwoman and CEO of Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide, �irst became a management supervisor, she considered herself to be a friendly, approachable, easy-going leader. She was shocked when a friend told her that one of her colleagues described her management style as “menacing.” That comment was devastating to Beers because it was the exact opposite of the way she thought of herself.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#MKZBUQTC7TBZRRY8F723) Many of us, like Charlotte Beers, have blind spots that hinder us from seeing who we really are and the effect our patterns of thought and behavior have on others. Beers now conducts seminars for women leaders, and one thing she tells them is the importance of clearly understanding themselves. The authors of a recent book pro�iling high achievers found that they all shared a similar characteristic: When faced with obstacles and failures, they underwent a ruthless self-examination to challenge their beliefs, biases, and assumptions.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#PKNBZYM0GJ8NSHEGH858) A careful self- re�lection is essential for most people to recognize their blind spots.
Charlotte Beers, interviewed by Adam Bryant, “The Best Scorecard Is the One You Keep for Yourself,” The New York Times (March 31, 2012), http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/business/charlotte-beers-on-the-importance-of-self-assessment.html?pagewanted=all (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/business/charlotte-beers-on-the-importance-of-self-assessment.html?pagewanted=all) (accessed April 1, 2012).
Camille Sweeney and Josh Gos�ield, The Art of Doing: How Superachievers Do What They Do and How They Do It So Well (New York: Plume/Penguin, 2013), as reported in Sweeney and Gos�ield, “Secret Ingredient for Success,” The New York Times (January 20, 2013), p. SR4.
4-1b. Leader Blind Spots
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, strive for self-awareness so that you know who you are and what you stand for. Undergo ruthless self- examination and seek feedback from others to avoid being derailed by blind spots.
Doug Rauch, retired president of Trader Joe's, almost strangled the life out of his company as it grew because of his tendency to, as he puts it, “happily micromanage.” Rauch recognized his zeal to control everything was hurting the company only when a brave senior buyer pulled him aside and said, “You're driving us crazy. You've got to back off.” Rauch was surprised, but the comment helped him see his blind spot. He went to the team and admitted his problem, told them he was a “recovering controlaholic,” and asked people to give him regular feedback so he didn't fall off the wagon.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#KYGSXMPWWSJCVAZW4509)
Doug Rauch, “Failure Chronicles: ‘You're Driving Us Crazy. You've Got to Back Off,’” Harvard Business Review (April 2011), p. 56.
Many leaders have blind spots —things they are not aware of or don't recognize as problems—that limit their effectiveness and hinder their career success.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#WRPE6N8YQZMDD2D1G132) One particularly damaging blind spot is displaying an aggressive, confrontational style, otherwise known as being a jerk. Lars Dalgaard, founder and former CEO of software company SuccessFactors (now part of SAP), says he never realized he acted like a jerk until a leadership coach helped him see that he ran roughshod over people's feelings. The coach helped Dalgaard make a conscious effort to build good relationships with employees and help others be more emotionally aware as well. SuccessFactors, which has an of�icial “no jerks rule,” has twice been voted one of the best places to work in the San Francisco Bay area.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#HAYUV92EHNHZX20Q6144)
blind spots characteristics or habits that people are not aware of or don't recognize as problems but which limit their effectiveness and hinder their career success
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 170/217
Steven Snyder, “Leadership Struggle: It's an Art to Be Mastered,” Leadership Excellence (January 2013), p. 11; and Ira Chaleff, “Avoid Fatal Crashes: Leaders and Their Blind Spots,” Leadership Excellence (May 2012), p. 13.
Sue Shellenbarger, “To Combat an Of�ice Tyrant, Look at the Roots,” The Wall Street Journal (April 28, 2010); and Ed Frauenheim, “Pulling No Punches,” Workforce Management (October 6, 2008), p. 1.
“The challenge for leadership is to be strong, but not rude; be kind, but not weak; be bold, but not bully; be thoughtful, but not lazy; be humble, but not timid; be proud, but not arrogant; have humor, but without folly.”
Jim Rohn (1930–2009), entrepreneur, author, and motivational speaker
Stanford professor Robert Sutton argues that jerks not only hurt the people they work with but also damage organizational performance. Sutton distinguishes between people who are perpetual jerks and those who only occasionally act that way. Perpetual jerks are those leaders who bully, humiliate, and emotionally abuse others, particularly people in less powerful positions.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#MNTF8C9WSTWV6CA40167) Even people who aren't perpetual jerks can suffer this blind spot. As leaders move up the hierarchy, people skills become more and more important, and leaders who have succeeded at lower levels often don't see that their approach is less effective as they advance in their careers. Jack Welch, the long-time former CEO of General Electric (GE), had to learn this lesson. When he was vying for the CEO position, his brashness and blunt approach almost cost him the job. GE's board knew Welch could generate pro�its, but they needed him to show them that he could act like a CEO, which meant recognizing and toning down his jerk qualities.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#GHSHUS16ZYRYPWGNJ020)
Robert I. Sutton, The No Asshole Rule: Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn't (New York: Warner Business Books, 2007).
Marshall Goldsmith, “People Skills: These Matter Most at the Top Level,” Leadership Excellences (June 2007), p. 9.
Another blind spot some leaders have is being too nice. Leaders who are constantly trying to please everyone can't lead. They often make poor decisions because they can't tolerate even a mild degree of con�lict.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#WKMFDG4F6VS2XG2RE477) When asked about her greatest weakness, Sue Murray, former executive director of the George Foundation, said, “I can be too nice when tough decisions need to be made, which is not helpful to anyone. It just prolongs the inevitable.”*
blind spots characteristics or habits that people are not aware of or don't recognize as problems but which limit their effectiveness and hinder their career success
blind spots characteristics or habits that people are not aware of or don't recognize as problems but which limit their effectiveness and hinder their career success
blind spots characteristics or habits that people are not aware of or don't recognize as problems but which limit their effectiveness and hinder their career success
blind spots characteristics or habits that people are not aware of or don't recognize as problems but which limit their effectiveness and hinder their career success
blind spots characteristics or habits that people are not aware of or don't recognize as problems but which limit their effectiveness and hinder their career success
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 171/217
(http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/ekwf0c3bmnu9zwlyq427#ASVBMA34DKCNYJMZZ955) Unlike Murray, many “people pleasers” have a blind spot that prevents them from seeing that they are damaging their relationships and careers by being overly concerned with what others think of them.
Alex Lickerman, “The Good Guy Contract,” Psychology Today (March–April 2010), pp. 42–43.
Quoted in L. Mitchell, “Ten Things I Don't Put on My C.V.: Sue Murray,” Age (October 25, 2008), p. 3.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 172/217
4-2. Personality and Leadership When a leader understands himself or herself and overcomes blind spots, it becomes easier to understand and interact effectively with others. Understanding personality differences is one aspect of knowing how to maximize your own effectiveness and that of the people you lead. Personality is the set of unseen characteristics and processes that underlie a relatively stable pattern of behavior in response to ideas, objects, or people in the environment. Lois Braverman, CEO of the Ackerman Institute for the Family, believes understanding and accepting individual personalities is essential for effective leadership.
In the Lead Lois Braverman, Ackerman Institute for the Family
If Lois Braverman could ask only a couple of questions to decide whether to hire a job candidate, one of them would be, “In terms of your personality and temperament, what will you bring that will be helpful to [this organization]?” Braverman's background as a psychotherapist makes her aware of how people's personality characteristics, as well as other individual differences, in�luence the workplace. She says she learned early on as a leader that her judgment in hiring could be skewed by “a great conversation.” Someone who is likable and charming might be fun to interview, but it doesn't necessarily mean they are responsible and trustworthy, or that they have the personality traits and qualities needed for the job, she points out.
Another leadership bene�it Braverman credits to her therapy background is an understanding that “reality is all about perception.” Con�licts can arise in any organization, she says, because people genuinely perceive some aspect of the world differently. As a leader, Braverman helps people “make room for the differences” so that con�licts don't escalate and damage morale and performance. She also applies the rule to herself. “There's an administrative reality and there's a
Personality the set of unseen characteristics and processes that underlie a relatively stable pattern of behavior in response to ideas, objects, and people in the environment
Personality the set of unseen characteristics and processes that underlie a relatively stable pattern of behavior in response to ideas, objects, and people in the environment
Personality the set of unseen characteristics and processes that underlie a relatively stable pattern of behavior in response to ideas, objects, and people in the environment
Personality the set of unseen characteristics and processes that underlie a relatively stable pattern of behavior in response to ideas, objects, and people in the environment
Personality the set of unseen characteristics and processes that underlie a relatively stable pattern of behavior in response to ideas, objects, and people in the environment
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 173/217
front line reality,” she says, “and those realities are rarely the same.” Making sure everyone feels that “their perception of reality at least has a chance to be heard” is one of the primary jobs of a leader.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#FYSP5R748HHJH9WN8928)
Adam Bryant, “Making Room for Differences,” (Corner Of�ice column), The New York Times (February 7, 2015), http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/business/corner-of�ice-making-room-for-differences.html?_r=0 (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/business/corner-of�ice-making-room-for-differences.html?_r=0) (accessed October 13, 2015).
The following sections discuss personality in more detail. Later in the chapter, we take a closer look at the topic of perception in connection with leadership.
4-2a. A Model of Personality
Most people think of personality in terms of traits. As we discussed in Chapter 2, researchers have investigated whether any traits stand up to scienti�ic scrutiny, and we looked at some traits associated with effective leadership. Although investigators have examined thousands of traits over the years, their �indings have been distilled into �ive general dimensions that describe personality. These often are called the Big Five personality dimensions , which describe an individual's extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#PHZQTWFK8QPS0T8G5362) Each dimension contains a wide range of speci�ic traits—for example, all of the personality traits that you would use to describe a teacher, friend, or boss could be categorized into one of the Big Five dimensions. These factors represent a continuum, in that a person may have a low, moderate, or high degree of each of the dimensions.
J. M. Digman, “Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model,” Annual Review of Psychology 41 (1990), pp. 417–440; M. R. Barrick and M. K. Mount, “Autonomy as a Moderator of the Relationships between the Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology (February 1993), pp. 111–118; J. S.
Big Five personality dimensions �ive general dimensions that describe personality: extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience
Big Five personality dimensions �ive general dimensions that describe personality: extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience
Big Five personality dimensions �ive general dimensions that describe personality: extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience
Big Five personality dimensions �ive general dimensions that describe personality: extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience
Big Five personality dimensions �ive general dimensions that describe personality: extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 174/217
Wiggins and A. L. Pincus, “Personality: Structure and Assessment,” Annual Review of Psychology 43 (1992), pp. 473–504; and Carl Zimmer, “Looking for Personality in Animals, of All People,” The New York Times (March 1, 2005), p. F1.
New Leader Action Memo
See where you fall on the Big Five scale for extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience by answering the questions in Leader's Self-Insight 4.1.
Extroversion is made up of traits and characteristics that in�luence behavior in group settings. Extroversion refers to the degree to which a person is outgoing, sociable, talkative, and comfortable meeting and talking to new people. Someone low on extroversion may come across as quiet, withdrawn, and socially unassertive. This dimension also includes the characteristic of dominance. A person with a high degree of dominance likes to be in control and have in�luence over others. These people often are quite self-con�ident, seek out positions of authority, and are competitive and assertive. They like to be in charge of others or have responsibility for others. It is obvious that both dominance and extroversion could be valuable for a leader. However, not all effective leaders necessarily have a high degree of these characteristics.
Leader's Self-Insight 4.1. The Big Five Personality Dimensions
Instructions: Each individual's collection of personality traits is different; it is what makes us unique. But, although each collection of traits varies, we all share many common traits. The following phrases describe various traits and behaviors. Rate how accurately each statement describes you, based on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being very inaccurate and 5 very accurate. Describe yourself as you are now, not as you wish to be. There are no right or wrong answers.
Extroversion the degree to which a person is outgoing, sociable, talkative, and comfortable meeting and talking to new people
Extroversion the degree to which a person is outgoing, sociable, talkative, and comfortable meeting and talking to new people
Extroversion the degree to which a person is outgoing, sociable, talkative, and comfortable meeting and talking to new people
Extroversion the degree to which a person is outgoing, sociable, talkative, and comfortable meeting and talking to new people
Extroversion the degree to which a person is outgoing, sociable, talkative, and comfortable meeting and talking to new people
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 175/217
Extroversion I love large parties. 1 2 3 4 5 I feel comfortable around people. 1 2 3 4 5 I talk to a lot of different people at social gatherings. 1 2 3 4 5 I like being the center of attention. 1 2 3 4 5
Neuroticism (Low Emotional Stability) I often feel critical of myself. 1 2 3 4 5 I often envy others. 1 2 3 4 5 I am temperamental. 1 2 3 4 5 I am easily bothered by things. 1 2 3 4 5
Agreeableness I am kind and sympathetic. 1 2 3 4 5 I have a good word for everyone. 1 2 3 4 5 I never insult people. 1 2 3 4 5 I put others �irst. 1 2 3 4 5
Openness to New Experiences I am imaginative. 1 2 3 4 5 I see beauty in many things. 1 2 3 4 5 I really like art. 1 2 3 4 5 I love to learn new things. 1 2 3 4 5
Conscientiousness I am systematic and ef�icient. 1 2 3 4 5 I pay attention to details. 1 2 3 4 5 I am always prepared for class. 1 2 3 4 5 I put things back where they belong. 1 2 3 4 5
Which are your most prominent traits? For fun and discussion, compare your responses with those of classmates.
Source: These questions were adapted from a variety of sources.
For example, many successful top leaders, including Larry Page of Google; Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway; Brenda Barnes, former CEO of Sara Lee; and Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, are introverts, people who become drained by social encounters and need time alone to re�lect and recharge their batteries. One study found that 4 in 10 top executives test out to be introverts.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#RRJN61XYSVB3TFUJ3178) Thus, the quality of extroversion is not as signi�icant as is often presumed. In addition, a high degree of dominance could even be detrimental to effective leadership if not tempered by other qualities, such as agreeableness or emotional stability.
Del Jones, “Not All Successful CEOs Are Extroverts,” USA Today (June 6, 2006), p. B1; and Bryan Walsh, “The Upside of Being an Introvert (and Why Extroverts Are Overrated),” Time (February 6, 2012), pp. 40–45.
Agreeableness refers to the degree to which a person is able to get along with others by being good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, compassionate, understanding, and trusting. A leader who scores high on agreeableness seems warm and
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 176/217
approachable, whereas one who is low on this dimension may seem cold, distant, and insensitive. Studies show that people who score high on agreeableness are more likely to get jobs and keep them than are less agreeable people.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#TVYU73EB68SVQHRGQ136) Although there is also some evidence that people who are overly agreeable tend to be promoted less often and earn less money, the days are over when leaders can expect to succeed by running roughshod over others and looking out only for themselves.
Reported in Daisy Grewal, “When Nice Guys Finish First,” Scienti�ic American Mind (July–August 2012), pp. 62–65.
Today's successful leaders are not the tough guys of the past but those men and women who know how to get people to like and trust them.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#YZKP3PAT2DDEERUAT299) Leaders are making a concerted effort to present a friendlier face to employees, the public, and shareholders after years of headlines exposing white-collar crime, CEO arrogance, and complaints over exorbitant pay. Lee Raymond, the former CEO of ExxonMobil, made plenty of money for investors but was described by some shareholders as “stubborn, self-important, [and] rude.” In contrast, Raymond's successor, Rex Tillerson, was publicly thanked at one annual meeting for his “friendliness, humor, and candor.”* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#YGXZYP52VNUHBC51R354)
Anthony J. Mayo and Nitin Nohria, “Double-Edged Sword,” People Management (October 27, 2005), pp. 36–38; Carol Hymowitz, “Rewarding Competitors over Collaborators No Longer Makes Sense” (In the Lead column), The Wall Street Journal (February 13, 2006), p. B1; and Joseph Nocera, “In Business, Tough Guys Finish Last,” The New York Times (June 18, 2005), p. C1.
Diane Brady, “Charm Offensive,” BusinessWeek (June 26, 2006), pp. 76–80.
The next personality dimension, conscientiousness , refers to the degree to which a person is responsible, dependable, persistent, and achievement oriented. A conscientious person is focused on a few goals, which he or she pursues in a purposeful way, whereas a less conscientious person tends to be easily distracted and impulsive. Recent research suggests that traits of conscientiousness are also more important than those of extroversion for effective leadership. A study at the Stanford Graduate School of Business found a link between how guilty people feel when they make serious mistakes and how well they perform as leaders.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#USQGJKMQKV7MV7RB3171) Guilt can be a positive emotion for a leader because it is associated with a heightened sense of responsibility to others.
Agreeableness the degree to which a person is able to get along with others by being good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, compassionate, understanding, and trusting
Agreeableness the degree to which a person is able to get along with others by being good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, compassionate, understanding, and trusting
Agreeableness the degree to which a person is able to get along with others by being good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, compassionate, understanding, and trusting
Agreeableness the degree to which a person is able to get along with others by being good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, compassionate, understanding, and trusting
Agreeableness the degree to which a person is able to get along with others by being good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, compassionate, understanding, and trusting
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 177/217
Research reported in J. J. McCorvey, “Research Corner: Feeling Guilty? Good. Why Guilt Makes You a Better Leader,” Inc. (July–August 2012), p. 26; and Rachel Emma Silverman, “Plagued by Guilt? You May Be Management Material,” The Wall Street Journal (May 29, 2012), http://blogs.wsj.com/atwork/2012/05/29/plagued-by- guilt-you-may-be-management-material/ (http://blogs.wsj.com/atwork/2012/05/29/plagued-by-guilt-you-may-be-management-material/) (accessed June 3, 2012).
Consider former International Monetary Fund leader Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who was likely on his way to the French presidency before he was arrested in New York and charged with the sexual assault of a hotel housekeeper, with further allegations from other women later coming to light.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#MNQL0Y9NQLVNCBQ02143) Strauss-Kahn displays a low level of conscientiousness, whereas a leader like Anne Mulcahy, former CEO of Xerox, re�lects a high degree of this characteristic. Mulcahy felt a strong sense of responsibility to employees and shareholders when she was named CEO of Xerox in 2001.The company was in a free fall, with the stock price plummeting and its credit rating downgraded. Advisers urged Mulcahy to declare bankruptcy, but she chose instead to focus on a vision of restoring Xerox to greatness. Although she had tough decisions to make, she always kept the best interests of employees and shareholders in mind.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#MPURPTUSE8S44VJC1928)
Anne-Elisabeth Moutet, “Dominique Strauss-Kahn: A Frenchman Sunk by a Sex Scandal?” The Telegraph (May 16, 2011), http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8515714/Dominique-Strauss-Kahn-A-Frenchman-sunk-by-a-sex-scandal.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8515714/Dominique-Strauss-Kahn-A-Frenchman-sunk-by-a-sex-scandal.html) (accessed August 26, 2012).
Bill George, “The Courage to Say ‘No’ to Wall Street” (segment in “America's Best Leaders”), U.S. News & World Report (December 1–December 8, 2008), pp. 34–51; Andrew Davidson, “Xerox Saviour in the Spotlight,” Sunday Times (June 1, 2008), p. 6; and David K. Williams, “Top 10 List: The Greatest Living Business Leaders Today,” Forbes (July 24, 2012), www.forbes.com/sites/davidkwilliams/2012/07/24/top-10-list-the-greatest-living-business-leaders-today/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidkwilliams/2012/07/24/top-10-list-the-greatest-living-business-leaders-today/) (accessed March 4, 2013).
The dimension of emotional stability refers to the degree to which a person is well adjusted, calm, and secure. A leader who is emotionally stable handles stress well, is able to handle criticism, and generally doesn't take mistakes or failures personally. Leaders with emotional stability typically develop positive relationships and can also improve relationships among others. Marillyn A. Hewson's high degree of emotional stability is part of the reason she was promoted to be the �irst female CEO of defense contractor Lockheed Martin, after the man originally picked for the top job was �ired following discovery of an ethical violation. It's a challenging time for Lockheed, but Hewson has shown that she can handle crises without becoming unhinged. Over her 30-year career at the company, her calm, steady hand has earned her a reputation for being able to combine toughness with graciousness. “Marillyn will be exactly what Lockheed Martin needs in terms of patching up its relationships …” said defense industry consultant Loren Thompson.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#XDEYAA52Q23EL67DE095)
conscientiousness the degree to which a person is responsible, dependable, persistent, and achievement oriented
conscientiousness the degree to which a person is responsible, dependable, persistent, and achievement oriented
conscientiousness the degree to which a person is responsible, dependable, persistent, and achievement oriented
conscientiousness the degree to which a person is responsible, dependable, persistent, and achievement oriented
conscientiousness the degree to which a person is responsible, dependable, persistent, and achievement oriented
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 178/217
Marjorie Censer, “After Nearly 30 Years with Lockheed, Hewson Is Named Chief Executive,” The Washington Post (November 13, 2012), http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/after-nearly-30-years-with-lockheed-hewson-is-named-chief-executive/2012/11/13/173cc04a- 2cdc-11e2-a99d-5c4203af7b7a_story.html?wprss=rss_business (http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/after-nearly-30-years-with-lockheed-hewson-is- named-chief-executive/2012/11/13/173cc04a-2cdc-11e2-a99d-5c4203af7b7a_story.html?wprss=rss_business) (accessed November 14, 2012); and Doug Cameron and Joann S. Lublin, “Vaulted to Top at Lockheed, and Ready to Navigate Cliff,” The Wall Street Journal Online (November 11, 2012), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324439804578113250113672078.html (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324439804578113250113672078.html) (accessed March 19, 2013).
Leaders who have a low degree of emotional stability are likely to become tense, anxious, or depressed. They generally have lower self-con�idence and may explode in emotional outbursts when stressed or criticized. The related topic of emotional intelligence will be discussed in detail in the next chapter.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can learn about your own basic personality dimensions and how to emphasize the positive aspects of your personality in dealing with followers.
The �inal Big Five dimension, openness to experience , is the degree to which a person has a broad range of interests and is imaginative, creative, and willing to consider new ideas. These people are intellectually curious and often seek out new experiences through travel, the arts, movies, reading widely, or other activities. People lower in this dimension tend to have narrower interests and stick to the tried-and-true ways of doing things. Open-mindedness is important to leaders because, as we learned in Chapter 1, leadership is about change rather than stability. In an interesting study of three nineteenth-century leaders—John Quincy Adams, Frederick Douglass, and Jane Addams—one researcher found that early travel experiences and exposure to different ideas and cultures were critical elements in developing open-minded qualities in these leaders.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#UGQCFR3Z0Q1K3KJ1E184) Travel during the formative years helped these leaders to develop a greater degree of openness to experience because it put them in situations that required adaptability.
emotional stability the degree to which a person is well adjusted, calm, and secure
emotional stability the degree to which a person is well adjusted, calm, and secure
emotional stability the degree to which a person is well adjusted, calm, and secure
emotional stability the degree to which a person is well adjusted, calm, and secure
emotional stability the degree to which a person is well adjusted, calm, and secure
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 179/217
James B. Hunt, “Travel Experience in the Formation of Leadership: John Quincy Adams, Frederick Douglass, and Jane Addams,” The Journal of Leadership Studies 7, no. 1 (2000), pp. 92–106.
Few studies have carefully examined the connection between the Big Five and leadership success. One summary of more than 70 years of personality and leadership research did �ind evidence that four of the �ive dimensions were consistently related to successful leadership.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#TLCQ139ULLE860V0U379) The researchers found considerable evidence that people who score high on the dimensions of extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability are more successful leaders. Results for openness to experience were less consistent; that is, in some cases, higher scores on this dimension related to better performance, but they did not seem to make a difference in other cases. Yet, in a study by a team of psychologists of the personality traits of the greatest U.S. presidents (as determined by historians), openness to experience produced the highest correlation with historians' ratings of greatness. The study noted that presidents such as Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson were high on this personality dimension. Other personality dimensions the team found to be associated with great presidents were extroversion and conscientiousness, including traits such as assertiveness, setting ambitious goals, and striving for achievement. Although agreeableness did not correlate with greatness, the ability to empathize with others and being concerned for others, which could be considered elements of emotional stability, did.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#THTGFVLQW8ZZEA1P8001)
R. T. Hogan, G. J. Curphy, and J. Hogan, “What We Know about Leadership: Effectiveness and Personality,” American Psychologist 49, no. 6 (1994), pp. 493–504.
Randolph E. Schmid, “Psychologists Rate What Helps Make a President Great,” Johnson City Press (August 6, 2000), p. 10; and “Personality and the Presidency” segment on NBC News with John Siegenthaler Jr. (August 5, 2000).
The value of the Big Five for leaders is primarily to help them understand their own basic personality dimensions and then learn to emphasize the positive and mitigate the negative aspects of their own natural styles. For example, people who are introverts often stagnate, especially in large organizations, because they have a dif�icult time getting noticed and are therefore less likely to be rewarded for their hard work.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#CETCJ6JCC17D3TPM1700) Four out of �ive introverts surveyed said they believe extroverts are more likely to get ahead at their place of employment.*
openness to experience the degree to which a person has a broad range of interests and is imaginative, creative, and willing to consider new ideas
openness to experience the degree to which a person has a broad range of interests and is imaginative, creative, and willing to consider new ideas
openness to experience the degree to which a person has a broad range of interests and is imaginative, creative, and willing to consider new ideas
openness to experience the degree to which a person has a broad range of interests and is imaginative, creative, and willing to consider new ideas
openness to experience the degree to which a person has a broad range of interests and is imaginative, creative, and willing to consider new ideas
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 180/217
(http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#DXQEGKHSZ6AFQKUQ3572) One experiment found that people who spoke up more often were rated as better leaders, even if they were less competent than their quieter colleagues.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#YAJZHN2NQRN3335ZD069) Introverts can learn to behave in more extroverted ways when they need to in order to be more successful. For example, Richard Branson dresses up in silly costumes to publicize the Virgin Group, but he says that �lamboyant public persona bears little resemblance to his innate personality. “I was a shy and retiring individual who couldn't make speeches and get out there,” Branson says of himself prior to founding Virgin. “I had to train myself into becoming more of an extrovert” in order to promote the new company.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#JKCPDZJ4Z828Y13P0756)
Jack and Suzy Welch, “Release Your Inner Extrovert,” BusinessWeek (December 8, 2008), p. 92; and Nancy Ancowitz, “Success Isn't Only for the Extroverts,” The New York Times (November 1, 2009), p. BU8.
Reported in “From the Front Lines: Leadership Strategies for Introverts,” Leader to Leader (Fall 2009), pp. 59–60.
Reported in Jeffrey Kluger, “Why Bosses Tend to Be Blowhards,” Time (March 2, 2009), p. 48.
Ginka Toegel and Jean-Louis Barsoux, “How to Become a Better Leader,” MIT Sloan Management Review (Spring 2012), pp. 51–60.
In recent years, there has been a growing awareness that introverted people have some qualities that might actually make them better leaders, as described further in the Leader's Bookshelf.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#BYDBHFUBGGVRJFQKV133) Introversion or extroversion is simply one aspect of an individual's personality, and each style has both strengths and weaknesses. Exhibit 4.1 gives some tips for both introverts and extroverts to help them be more effective and successful.
Susan Cain, “Hire Introverts,” The Atlantic (July–August 2012), p. 68; Adam M. Grant, Francesca Gino, and David A. Hofmann, “The Hidden Advantages of Quiet Bosses,” Harvard Business Review (December 2010), p. 28; Susan Cain, “Must Great Leaders Be Gregarious?” The New York Times (September 16, 2012), p. SR-8; and Walsh, “The Upside of Being an Introvert.”
Exhibit 4.1. Maximizing Leadership Effectiveness
Tips for Extroverts Tips for Introverts
Don't bask in the glow of your own personality. Learn to hold back and let others sometimes have the limelight.
Try to underwhelm. Your natural exuberance can cause you to miss important facts and ideas.
Talk less; listen more. Develop the discipline to let others speak �irst on an issue to avoid the appearance of arrogance.
Don't be Mr. or Ms. Personality. Extroverts sometimes fail to recognize others' needs and can easily wear people out rather than invigorate them.
Mix with people, speak up, and get out there. Push yourself to get out there and connect with people both within and outside the organization.
Practice being friendly and outgoing in settings outside of work. Take your new skills to the of�ice.
Have a game plan. Prepare well for meetings and presentations. Anticipate questions and rehearse a few talking points.
Smile. A frown or a soberly introspective expression can be misinterpreted. A bright countenance re�lects con�idence that you know where you're going and want others to follow.
Sources: Based on Patricia Wallington, “The Ins and Outs of Personality,” CIO (January 15, 2003), pp. 42, 44; “From the Front Lines: Leadership Strategies for Introverts,” Leader to Leader (Fall 2009), pp. 59–60; Joann S. Lublin, “Introverted Execs Find Ways to Shine,” The Wall Street Journal Asia (April 18, 2011), p. 31; and Ginka Toegel and Jean-Louis Barsoux, “How to Become a Better Leader,” MIT Sloan Management Review (Spring 2012), pp. 51–60.
Leader's Bookshelf Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking by Susan Cain
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 181/217
From kindergarten on in the United States, students are pressured to be more outgoing and speak up more in class. In college, grades are sometimes based on class participation, and students who don't forcefully push their ideas get sidelined. No wonder by the time we get to the workplace, we know that talk and social interaction are prized above quietness and thoughtfulness. In her book Quiet, Susan Cain argues that by succumbing to the charms of the extrovert, organizations are missing out on the creativity, insights, and ideas of the one-third to one-half of Americans who are introverts.
Misconceptions about Introverts
Cain's thoughtful examination, using research studies, historical examples, and individual stories, explodes some of the myths about introversion.
Introverts are shy and antisocial. Some introverts are shy, but many are not. They simply interact in a different way. Whereas the extrovert will “work the room” at a party, the introvert prefers to carry on deeper conversations with one or a few people. Introverts need time alone to re�lect and recharge, but that doesn't mean they don't also enjoy the company of other people.
Introverts have a personality �law. In a culture that prizes extroversion, the tendency of introverts toward solitary activity and quiet re�lection marks them as having “a second-class personality trait, somewhere between a disappointment and a pathology.” Cain points out many advantages to the introverted personality: introverts tend to think more deeply, make decisions more carefully, and stay on task longer. Introversion is uniquely conducive to creativity and innovation. Extrovert Steve Jobs was the pizzazz of Apple, but the company would never have existed if introverted cofounder Steven Wozniak had not spent long hours alone creating the �irst personal computer.
Introverts don't make good leaders. This is perhaps the biggest misconception of all. Introverts such as Bill Gates and Warren Buffett succeed at the top of big corporations, but introverts also make excellent lower- level supervisors and managers because of their greater ability to listen. Cain cites research showing that introverts do very well leading teams, even those made up primarily of extroverts, because they can stand aside and let the good ideas �low rather than pushing their own thoughts and opinions.
Can't We All Just Get Along?
No one is totally an introvert or an extrovert. Each of us falls somewhere along a continuum on the scale of introversion– extroversion. The problem, Cain says, is the tendency in the United States and other Western cultures to revere extroverts and try to push everyone to that end of the scale. Cain challenges leaders to show respect and truly listen to their introverted colleagues and subordinates, not just be swayed by the loudest voices. “You need to do this as a manager,” she says, “because you … want the best out of people's brains.”
Source: Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking, by Susan Cain, is published by Crown Publishers.
4-2b. Personality Traits and Leader Behavior
Two speci�ic personality attributes that have a signi�icant impact on behavior and are thus of particular interest for leadership studies are locus of control and authoritarianism.
New Leader Action Memo
Do you believe luck, chance, or the actions of other people play a major role in your life, or do you feel in control of your own fate? Learn more about your locus of control by completing the questionnaire in Leader's Self-Insight 4.2.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 182/217
Locus of Control Some people believe that their actions can strongly affect what happens to them. In other words, they believe they are “masters of their own fate.” Others feel that whatever happens to them in life is a result of luck, chance, or outside people and events; they believe they have little control over their fate. A person's locus of control de�ines whether he or she places the primary responsibility within the self or on outside forces.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#YMZLNUCSBBH9HVVYA164) People who believe their actions determine what happens to them have a high internal locus of control (internals), whereas those who believe outside forces determine what happens to them have a high external locus of control (externals). One leader who re�lects a strong internal locus of control is Chris Hughes, cofounder of Facebook.
“Theories of Emeritus Professor Julian Rotter Still Relevant to Field of Clinical Psychology” U.S. Fed News Service, Including US State News (August 12, 2012) (retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/docview/1032581459?accountid=14816) (http://search.proquest.com.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/docview/1032581459?accountid=14816) ; P. E. Spector, “Behavior in Organizations as a Function of Employee's Locus of Control,” Psychological Bulletin (May 1982), pp. 482–497; and H. M. Lefcourt, “Durability and Impact of the Locus of Control Construct,” Psychological Bulletin 112 (1992), pp. 411–414.
In the Lead Chris Hughes, Facebook and MyBarackObama.com (http://MyBarackObama.com)
Chris Hughes grew up in Hickory, North Carolina, as the only child of older parents. His father was a paper salesman and his mother a former public school teacher. When Hughes entered high school, he decided he wanted something different than graduating from the local school and getting a job in town. In fact, what he wanted was to attend a prestigious prep school and go on to an Ivy League university.
With his family's background and modest means, it was de�initely an ambitious goal, but Hughes believed his fate was in his own hands. Without telling his parents, he began researching and applying to various boarding schools. Eventually he was offered a generous �inancial aid package from Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts. A few years later, he left there with a scholarship to Harvard.
locus of control de�ines whether a person places the primary responsibility for what happens to him or her within himself/herself or on outside forces
locus of control de�ines whether a person places the primary responsibility for what happens to him or her within himself/herself or on outside forces
locus of control de�ines whether a person places the primary responsibility for what happens to him or her within himself/herself or on outside forces
locus of control de�ines whether a person places the primary responsibility for what happens to him or her within himself/herself or on outside forces
locus of control de�ines whether a person places the primary responsibility for what happens to him or her within himself/herself or on outside forces
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 183/217
Hughes met Mark Zuckerberg and Dustin Moskovitz during his freshman year at Harvard and the three founded Facebook. Then, during the 2008 presidential campaign, Hughes became attracted to the idea of using new media to get Barack Obama elected. Volunteers �looded the site he built, MyBarackObama.com, from the day it launched. Hughes was later featured on the cover of Fast Company magazine as “The Kid Who Made Obama President.”* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#SMZA6EHLELT5BBRK8672)
Ellen McGirt, “Boy Wonder,” Fast Company (April 2009), pp. 58–65, 96–97.
Leader's Self-Insight 4.2. Measuring Locus of Control
Instructions: For each of these 10 questions, indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree using the following scale:
1 = Strongly disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Slightly disagree
4 = Neither agree nor disagree
5 = Slightly agree
6 = Agree
7 = Strongly agree
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree 1. When I get what I want, it's usually because I worked hard for it. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. When I make plans, I am almost certain to make them work. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. I prefer games involving some luck over games requiring pure skill. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. I can learn almost anything if I set my mind to it. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. My major accomplishments are entirely due to my hard work and ability. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. I usually don't set goals, because I have a hard time following through on
them. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7. Competition discourages excellence. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Often people get ahead just by being lucky. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. On any sort of exam or competition, I like to know how well I do relative
to everyone else. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
10. It's pointless to keep working on something that's too dif�icult for me. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Scoring and Interpretation
To determine your score, reverse the values you selected for questions 3, 6, 7, 8, and 10 (1 = 7, 2 = 6, 3 = 5, 4 = 4, 5 = 3, 6 = 2, 7 = 1). For example, if you strongly disagreed with the statement in question 3, you would have given it a value of 1. Change this value to a 7. Reverse the scores in a similar manner for questions 6, 7, 8, and 10. Now add the point values from all 10 questions together.
Your score:
This questionnaire is designed to measure locus of control beliefs. Researchers using this questionnaire in a study of college students found a mean of 51.8 for men and 52.2 for women, with a standard deviation of 6 for each. The higher your score on this questionnaire, the more you tend to believe that you are generally responsible for what happens to you; in other words, high scores are associated with internal locus of control. Low scores are associated with external
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 184/217
locus of control. Scoring low indicates that you tend to believe that forces beyond your control, such as powerful other people, fate, or chance, are responsible for what happens to you.
Source: Adapted from J. M. Burger, Personality: Theory and Research (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1986), pp. 400–401. Original source for Burger's questionnaire is D. L. Paulhus, “Sphere-Speci�ic Measures of Perceived Control,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (1983), pp. 1253–1265.
Chris Hughes exhibits many characteristics associated with internal locus of control. Research has shown real differences in behavior between internals and externals across a wide range of settings.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#BZGDHM46HNTUAPSWD964) Internals in general are more self-motivated, are in better control of their own behavior, participate more in social and political activities, and more actively seek information. There is also evidence that internals are better able to handle complex information and problem solving, and that they are more achievement oriented than externals. In addition, people with a high internal locus of control are more likely than externals to try to in�luence others and thus more likely to assume or seek leadership opportunities. Moreover, people with a high internal locus of control will take responsibility for outcomes and changes, which is essential for leadership.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#ZWMFSS1ST4V26V19Y883)
Spector, “Behavior in Organizations as a Function of Employee's Locus of Control”; Lefcourt, “Durability and Impact of the Locus of Control Construct”; and J. B. Miner, Industrial-Organizational Psychology (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992), p. 151.
Elizabeth A. McDaniel and Holly DiBella-McCarthy, “Re�lective Leaders Become Causal Agents of Change,” Journal of Management Development 31, no. 7 (2012), pp. 663– 671.
People with a high external locus of control typically prefer to have structured, directed work situations. They are better able than internals to handle work that requires compliance and conformity, but they are generally not as effective in situations that require initiative, creativity, and independent action. Therefore, since externals do best in situations where success depends on complying with the direction or guidance of others, they are less likely to enjoy or succeed in leadership positions.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can improve your effectiveness by recognizing how traits such as authoritarianism and locus of control affect your relationships with followers. You can tone down a strong authoritarian personality to motivate others.
Authoritarianism The belief that power and status differences should exist in an organization is called authoritarianism .* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/�hdu7tnpkb3jwcdch159#RNYBBJQMCSZU0R34P459) Individuals who have a high degree of this personality trait tend to adhere to conventional rules and values, obey established authority, respect power and toughness, judge others critically, and disapprove of the expression of personal feelings. A leader's degree of authoritarianism will affect how the leader wields and shares power. A highly authoritarian leader is likely to rely heavily on formal authority and unlikely to want to share power with subordinates. High authoritarianism is associated with the traditional, rational approach to management described in Chapter 1 and the autocratic style of leadership described in Chapter 2. The new leadership paradigm requires that leaders be less authoritarian, although people who rate high on this personality trait can be effective leaders as well. Leaders should also understand that the degree to which followers possess authoritarianism in�luences how they react to the leader's use of power and authority. When leaders and followers differ in their degree of authoritarianism, effective leadership may be more dif�icult to achieve.
authoritarianism the belief that power and status differences should exist in an organization
authoritarianism
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 185/217
T. W. Adorno, E. Frenkel-Brunswick, D. J. Levinson, and R. N. Sanford, The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper & Row, 1950).
Understanding how personality traits and dimensions affect behavior can be an advantage for leaders, giving them valuable insights into their own behavior as well as that of followers. Another important area for understanding individual differences is values and attitudes.
the belief that power and status differences should exist in an organization
authoritarianism the belief that power and status differences should exist in an organization
authoritarianism the belief that power and status differences should exist in an organization
authoritarianism the belief that power and status differences should exist in an organization
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 186/217
4-3. Values and Attitudes Individuals may differ signi�icantly in the values and attitudes they hold. These differences affect the behavior of leaders and followers.
4-3a. Instrumental and End Values
Values are fundamental beliefs that an individual considers to be important, that are relatively stable over time, and that have an impact on attitudes, perception, and behavior.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#AWXSQTG7JUKGX7SF3101) Values are what cause a person to prefer that things be done one way rather than another way. Whether we recognize it or not, we are constantly valuing things, people, or ideas as good or bad, pleasant or unpleasant, ethical or unethical, and so forth.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#LCUHV7B5QCF8KR2NN897)
E. C. Ravlin and B. M. Meglino, “Effects of Values on Perception and Decision Making: A Study of Alternative Work Value Measures,” Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (1987), pp. 666–673.
Robert C. Benfari, Understanding and Changing Your Management Style (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999), p. 172.
One way to think about values is in terms of instrumental and end values.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#GEAG9Y3HH9GD5BJWJ419) Social scientist Milton Rokeach developed a list of 18 instrumental values and 18 end values that have been found to be more or less universal across cultures. The full list of Rokeach's values is shown in Leader's Self-Insight 4.3. End values , sometimes called terminal values, are beliefs about the kinds of goals or outcomes that are worth trying to pursue. For example, some people value security, a comfortable life, and good health above everything else as the important goals to strive for in life. Others may place greater value on social recognition, pleasure, and an exciting life. Instrumental values are beliefs about the types of behavior that are appropriate for reaching goals. Instrumental values include such things as being helpful to others, being honest, or exhibiting courage.
Values fundamental beliefs that an individual considers to be important, that are relatively stable over time, and that have an impact on attitudes and behavior
Values fundamental beliefs that an individual considers to be important, that are relatively stable over time, and that have an impact on attitudes and behavior
Values fundamental beliefs that an individual considers to be important, that are relatively stable over time, and that have an impact on attitudes and behavior
Values fundamental beliefs that an individual considers to be important, that are relatively stable over time, and that have an impact on attitudes and behavior
End values
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 187/217
Milton Rokeach, The Nature of Human Values (New York: The Free Press, 1973); and M. Rokeach, Understanding Human Values (New York: The Free Press, 1979).
Leader's Self-Insight 4.3. Instrumental and End Values
Instructions: In each column below, place a check mark by the �ive values that are most important to you. After you have checked �ive values in each column, rank-order the checked values in each column from 1 to 5, with 1 = most important and 5 = least important.
Rokeach's Instrumental and End Values
End Values Instrumental Values A comfortable life Ambition
sometimes called terminal values, these are beliefs about the kinds of goals or outcomes that are worth trying to pursue
Instrumental values beliefs about the types of behavior that are appropriate for reaching goals
End values sometimes called terminal values, these are beliefs about the kinds of goals or outcomes that are worth trying to pursue
Instrumental values beliefs about the types of behavior that are appropriate for reaching goals
End values sometimes called terminal values, these are beliefs about the kinds of goals or outcomes that are worth trying to pursue
Instrumental values beliefs about the types of behavior that are appropriate for reaching goals
End values sometimes called terminal values, these are beliefs about the kinds of goals or outcomes that are worth trying to pursue
Instrumental values beliefs about the types of behavior that are appropriate for reaching goals
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 188/217
End Values Instrumental Values Equality Broad-mindedness An exciting life Capability Family security Cheerfulness Freedom Cleanliness Health Courage Inner harmony Forgiveness Mature love Helpfulness National security Honesty Pleasure Imagination Salvation Intellectualism Self-respect Logic A sense of accomplishment Ability to love Social recognition Loyalty True friendship Obedience Wisdom Politeness A world at peace Responsibility A world of beauty Self-control
NOTE: The values are listed in alphabetical order, and there is no one-to-one relationship between the end and instrumental values.
Scoring and Interpretation
End values, according to Rokeach, tend to fall into two categories—personal and social. For example, mature love is a personal end value and equality is a social end value. Analyze the �ive end values you selected and their rank order, and determine whether your primary end values tend to be personal or social. What do your �ive selections together mean to you? What do they mean for how you make life decisions? Compare your end value selections with those of another person, with each of you explaining what you learned about your end values from this exercise.
Instrumental values also tend to fall into two categories—morality and competence. The means people use to achieve their goals might violate moral values (e.g., be dishonest) or violate one's personal sense of competence and capability (e.g., be illogical). Analyze the �ive instrumental values you selected and their rank order, and determine whether your primary instrumental values tend to focus on morality or competence. What do the �ive selected values together mean to you? What do they mean for how you will pursue your life goals? Compare your instrumental value selections with those of another person and describe what you learned from this exercise.
Warning: The two columns shown to the left do not represent the full range of instrumental and end values. Your �indings would change if a different list of values were provided. This exercise is for discussion and learning purposes only and is not intended to be an accurate assessment of your actual end and instrumental values.
Sources: Robert C. Benfari, Understanding and Changing Your Management Style (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999), pp. 178–183; and M. Rokeach, Understanding Human Values (New York: The Free Press, 1979).
New Leader Action Memo
Complete the exercise in Leader's Self-Insight 4.3 to see what you can learn about your own values and how they affect your decisions and actions. Were you surprised by any of your instrumental or end values?
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 189/217
Although everyone has both instrumental and end values, individuals differ in how they order the values into priorities, which accounts for tremendous variation among people. Understanding one's own values clari�ies what is important, which is essential for effective leadership. Exhibit 4.2 shows some interesting differences in how groups of managers and non-managers prioritized values in one study. The exhibit lists end values and instrumental values that were ranked signi�icantly higher by each group, showing only those rankings that were statistically signi�icant.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#WAVRDBG4ZVVR0G4TH882) Leaders can identify and understand value differences to improve communication and effectiveness.
Edward F. Murphy Jr., Jane Whitney Gibson, and Regina A. Greenwood, “Analyzing Generational Values among Managers and Non-Managers for Sustainable Organizational Effectiveness,” SAM Advanced Management Journal (Winter 2010), pp. 33–55.
Exhibit 4.2. Differences in Leaders' and Nonleaders' Value Rankings
Source: Based on Table 2, Differences in Managers' versus Non-Managers' Terminal and Instrumental Value Ranking, in Edward F. Murphy Jr., Jane Whitney Gibson, and Regina A. Greenwood, “Analyzing Generational Values among Managers and Non- Managers for Sustainable Organizational Effectiveness,” SAM Advanced Management Journal (Winter 2010), pp. 33–55.
National culture, generational differences, and family background can in�luence how people rank values. For example, in the United States, independence is highly valued and is reinforced by many institutions, including schools, religious organizations, and businesses. Other cultures place less value on independence and more value on being part of a tightly knit community. Younger people typically rank family security lower than do older people.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#CXSQ9MW54QPUX8RE5916) Some leaders cite their parents as a primary source of their deeply held values. Bill Farmer, who retired from Time Warner Cable and is now president and CEO of United Way of the Bluegrass in Lexington, Kentucky, says his mother instilled in him the importance of giving back to the community. Farmer moved eight times in 28 years while with Time Warner and in each new city he volunteered with numerous nonpro�it organizations and became actively involved in local initiatives designed to create a positive community environment.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#RRDLT4QXJQ2841EM0511)
Murphy et al., “Analyzing Generational Values among Managers and Non-Managers.”
Lynne Jeter, “Early Lessons Helped Form Leadership Skills,” The Mississippi Business Journal (March 13, 2006), p. 23; and “2011 Harvey E. Beech Outstanding Alumni Award; BAR Awards Pro�ile—William W. Farmer,” University of North Carolina General Alumni Association, https://alumni.unc.edu/awards-pro�ile-william-w- farmer/ (https://alumni.unc.edu/awards-pro�ile-william-w-farmer/) (accessed October 14, 2015).
Our values are generally fairly well established by early adulthood, but a person's values can also change throughout life. This chapter's Consider This re�lects on how the values that shape a leader's actions in a moment of crisis have been developed over time. Values may affect leaders and leadership in a number of ways.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#VYJJ3722LTHAAQC2N904) For one thing, values in�luence how leaders relate to others. A leader who values obedience, conformity, and politeness may have a dif�icult
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 190/217
time understanding and appreciating a follower who is self-reliant, independent, creative, and a bit rebellious. Personal values in�luence how leaders perceive opportunities, situations, and problems, as well as the decisions they make in response to them. Consider the decisions Vern Clark made as U.S. Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) from 2000 until his retirement in 2005.
Based on G. W. England and R. Lee, “The Relationship between Managerial Values and Managerial Success in the United States, Japan, India, and Australia,” Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (1974), pp. 411–419.
In the Lead Admiral Vernon E. Clark, U.S. Chief of Naval Operations, 2000–2005
Admiral Vernon E. Clark, who retired in July 2005 after a 37-year career in the U.S. Navy, was the second-longest serving U.S. CNO. The job of the CNO is to advise the president on the conduct of war.
When Clark was named CNO in July 2000, the Navy was losing too many good sailors who didn't want to re-enlist. For Clark, getting and keeping good sailors who could protect the national security was a top priority, and all his decisions were based on valuing the people on the front lines. When Navy of�icials proposed budget cuts in training and development, Clark rebelled. Instead he increased the training budget, strongly supported an increase in pay for sailors, and established the Naval Education and Training Command, with 12 Centers of Excellence. Clark also revised the performance appraisal system to provide constructive feedback for people at all levels. Clark made it a priority to blur the lines between enlisted sailors and of�icers and revised the job assignment process so people didn't get forced into jobs and locations they didn't want. Always more concerned about doing things right than being right, Clark encouraged everyone to challenge assumptions, ask questions, and express con�licting views.
Thanks to Admiral Clark's emphasis on treating sailors right, �irst term re-enlistment soared from 38 percent to 56.7 percent within his �irst 18 months as CNO. Moreover, as the Navy retained more sailors, its ability to respond more quickly to protect the nation increased.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#FSZT71Q2DXDEBTPKU976)
Example from Michael Lee Stallard, “Great Leaders Connect: Using Their Vision, Values, and Voice,” Leadership Excellence (August 2012), p. 19.
A leader like Admiral Vernon Clark who places high value on supporting followers, being courageous, and standing up for what one believes in is much more likely to make decisions that may not always be popular but that he believes are right. Leaders can be more effective when they clarify their own values and understand how values guide their actions and affect their organizations. In addition, for many organizations today, clarifying and stating their corporate values, including ethical values, has become an important part of de�ining how the organization operates.
4-3b. How Attitudes Affect Leadership
Values help determine the attitudes leaders have about themselves and about their followers. An attitude is an evaluation— either positive or negative—about people, events, or things. As we discussed in Chapter 2, an optimistic attitude or positive outlook on life is often considered a key to successful and effective leadership.
attitude an evaluation (either positive or negative) about people, events, or things
attitude an evaluation (either positive or negative) about people, events, or things
attitude an evaluation (either positive or negative) about people, events, or things
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 191/217
Consider This! Developing Character
“The character that takes command in moments of critical choices has already been determined. It has been determined by a thousand other choices made earlier in seemingly unimportant moments. It has been determined by all those ‘little’ choices of years past—by all those times when the voice of conscience was at war with the voice of temptation— whispering a lie that ‘it doesn't really matter.’ It has been determined by all the day-to-day decisions made when life seemed easy and crises seemed far away, the decisions that piece by piece, bit by bit, developed habits of discipline or of laziness; habits of self-sacri�ice or self-indulgence; habits of duty and honor and integrity—or dishonor and shame.”
Source: President Ronald Reagan, quoted in Norman R. Augustine, “Seven Fundamentals of Effective Leadership,” an original essay written for the Center for the Study of American Business, Washington University in St. Louis, CEO Series, no. 27 (October 1998).
A leader's attitudes toward followers in�luence how he or she relates to people.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#LNAXJMT1K3C6W2JJW563) Every leader's style is based to some extent on attitudes about human nature in general—ideas and feelings about what motivates people, whether people are basically honest and trustworthy, and the extent to which people can grow and change. One theory to explain differences in style was developed by Douglas McGregor, based on his experiences as a manager and consultant and his training as a psychologist.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#MAKZCZRZ1PZ4BYHHV863) McGregor identi�ied two sets of assumptions about human nature, called Theory X and Theory Y , which represent two very different sets of attitudes about how to interact with and in�luence subordinates. Exhibit 4.3 explains the fundamental assumptions of Theory X and Theory Y.
attitude an evaluation (either positive or negative) about people, events, or things
Theory X the assumption that people are basically lazy and not motivated to work and that they have a natural tendency to avoid responsibility
Theory Y the assumption that people do not inherently dislike work and will commit themselves willingly to work that they care about
Theory X the assumption that people are basically lazy and not motivated to work and that they have a natural tendency to avoid responsibility
Theory Y the assumption that people do not inherently dislike work and will commit themselves willingly to work that they care about
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 192/217
Based on Richard L. Hughes, Robert C. Ginnett, and Gordon J. Curphy, Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience (Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 1999), pp. 182–184.
Douglas McGregor, The Human Side of Enterprise (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960).
Exhibit 4.3. Attitudes and Assumptions of Theory X and Theory Y
Assumptions of Theory X Assumptions of Theory Y
The average human being has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if possible.
Because of the human characteristic of dislike for work, most people must be coerced, controlled, directed, or threatened with punishment to get them to put forth adequate effort toward the achievement of organizational objectives.
The average human being prefers to be directed, wishes to avoid responsibility, has relatively little ambition, and wants security above all.
The expenditure of physical and mental effort in work is as natural as play or rest. The average human being does not inherently dislike work.
External control and the threat of punishment are not the only means for bringing about effort toward organizational objectives. A person will exercise self-direction and self-control in the service of objectives to which he or she is committed.
The average human being learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept but also to seek responsibility.
The capacity to exercise a relatively high degree of imagination, ingenuity, and creativity in the solution of organizational problems is widely, not narrowly, distributed in the population.
Under the conditions of modern industrial life, the intellectual potentialities of the average human being are only partially utilized.
Theory X the assumption that people are basically lazy and not motivated to work and that they have a natural tendency to avoid responsibility
Theory Y the assumption that people do not inherently dislike work and will commit themselves willingly to work that they care about
Theory X the assumption that people are basically lazy and not motivated to work and that they have a natural tendency to avoid responsibility
Theory Y the assumption that people do not inherently dislike work and will commit themselves willingly to work that they care about
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 193/217
Source: Based on Douglas McGregor, The Human Side of Enterprise (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960), pp. 33–48.
In general, Theory X re�lects the assumption that people are basically lazy and not motivated to work and that they have a natural tendency to avoid responsibility. Thus, a supervisor who subscribes to the assumptions of Theory X has the attitude that people must be coerced, controlled, directed, or threatened to get them to put forth their best effort. Referring back to Chapter 2, the Theory X leader would likely be task oriented and highly concerned with production rather than people. Theory Y, on the other hand, is based on assumptions that people do not inherently dislike work and will commit themselves willingly to work that they care about. Theory Y also assumes that, under the right conditions, people will seek out greater responsibility and will exercise imagination and creativity in the pursuit of solutions to organizational problems. A leader who subscribes to the assumptions of Theory Y does not believe people have to be coerced and controlled in order to perform effectively. These leaders are more often people oriented and concerned with relationships, although some Theory Y leaders can also be task- or production oriented. McGregor believed Theory Y to be a more realistic and productive approach for viewing subordinates and shaping leaders' attitudes. Studies exploring the relationship between leader attitudes and leadership success in general support his idea, although this relationship has not been carefully explored.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/hkqjr1e4kt2zf7lte466#QCYVVURV0GYA0KUAW287)
J. Hall and S. M. Donnell, “Managerial Achievement: The Personal Side of Behavioral Theory,” Human Relations 32 (1979), pp. 77–101.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 194/217
4-4. Social Perception and Attributions By perception , we mean the process people use to make sense out of their surroundings by selecting, organizing, and interpreting information. Values and attitudes affect perceptions, and vice versa. For example, a person might have developed the attitude that leaders are insensitive and arrogant, based on a pattern of perceiving arrogant and insensitive behavior from supervisors over a period of time. If the person moves to a new job, this attitude will continue to affect the way he or she perceives superiors in the new environment, even though his superiors in the new workplace might take great pains to understand and respond to employees' needs. As another example, a leader who greatly values ambition and career success may perceive a problem or a subordinate's mistake as an impediment to her own success, whereas a leader who values helpfulness and obedience might see it as a chance to help a subordinate improve or grow.
Because of individual differences in attitudes, personality, values, interests, and experiences, people often “see” the same thing in different ways. Consider that one survey of nearly 2,000 workers in the United States found that 92 percent of managers think they are doing an “excellent” or “good” job managing employees, but only 67 percent of workers agree. As another example, in a survey of �inance professionals, 40 percent of women said they perceive that women face a “glass ceiling” that keeps them from reaching top management levels, whereas only 10 percent of men share that perception.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/avrwvud9w69wveux1469#WYZJGLGX2NZR83CJ0647)
Andrea Coombes, “Managers Rate Themselves High but Workers Prove Tough Critics,” The Wall Street Journal (September 26, 2006), p. B8; and Jaclyne Badal, “Surveying the Field: Cracking the Glass Ceiling” (sidebar in Theory & Practice column), The Wall Street Journal (June 19, 2006), p. B3.
4-4a. Perceptual Distortions
Of particular concern for leaders are perceptual distortions , errors in perceptual judgment that arise from inaccuracies in perception. Some types of errors are so common that leaders should become familiar with them. These include stereotyping, the halo effect, projection, and perceptual defense. Leaders who recognize these perceptual distortions can better adjust their perceptions to more closely match objective reality.
perception the process people use to make sense out of the environment by selecting, organizing, and interpreting information
perception the process people use to make sense out of the environment by selecting, organizing, and interpreting information
perception the process people use to make sense out of the environment by selecting, organizing, and interpreting information
perceptual distortions errors in judgment that arise from inaccuracies in the perceptual process
perceptual distortions errors in judgment that arise from inaccuracies in the perceptual process
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 195/217
Stereotyping is the tendency to assign an individual to a group or broad category (e.g., female, black, elderly or male, white, disabled) and then to attribute widely held generalizations about the group to the individual. Thus, someone meets a new colleague, sees he is in a wheelchair, assigns him to the category “physically disabled,” and attributes to this colleague generalizations she believes about people with disabilities, which may include a belief that he is less able than other coworkers. However, the person's inability to walk should not be seen as indicative of lesser abilities in other areas. Indeed, the assumption of limitations may not only offend him, but it also prevents the person making the stereotypical judgment from bene�iting from the many ways in which this person can contribute. Stereotyping prevents people from truly knowing those they classify in this way. In addition, negative stereotypes prevent talented people from advancing in an organization and fully contributing their talents to the organization's success.
The halo effect occurs when the perceiver develops an overall impression of a person or situation based on one characteristic, either favorable or unfavorable. In other words, a halo blinds the perceiver to other characteristics that should be used in generating a more complete assessment. The halo effect can play a signi�icant role in performance appraisal. For example, a person with an outstanding attendance record may be assessed as responsible, industrious, and highly productive; another person with less-than-average attendance may be assessed as a poor performer. Either assessment may be true, but it is the leader's job to be sure the assessment is based on complete information about all job-related characteristics and not just his or her preferences for good attendance.
perceptual distortions errors in judgment that arise from inaccuracies in the perceptual process
Stereotyping the tendency to assign an individual to a broad category and then attribute generalizations about the group to the individual
Stereotyping the tendency to assign an individual to a broad category and then attribute generalizations about the group to the individual
Stereotyping the tendency to assign an individual to a broad category and then attribute generalizations about the group to the individual
halo effect an overall impression of a person or situation based on one characteristic, either favorable or unfavorable
halo effect an overall impression of a person or situation based on one characteristic, either favorable or unfavorable
halo effect an overall impression of a person or situation based on one characteristic, either favorable or unfavorable
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 196/217
Projection is the tendency of perceivers to see their own personal traits in other people; that is, they project their own needs, feelings, values, and attitudes into their judgment of others. A leader who is achievement oriented might assume that subordinates are as well. This might cause the manager to restructure jobs to be less routine and more challenging without regard for employees' actual satisfaction. The best safeguards against errors based on projection are self-awareness and empathy.
Perceptual defense is the tendency of perceivers to protect themselves against ideas, objects, or people that are threatening. People perceive things that are satisfying and pleasant but tend to disregard things that are disturbing and unpleasant. In essence, people develop blind spots in the perceptual process so that negative sensory data do not hurt them. For example, the director of a nonpro�it educational organization in Tennessee hated dealing with con�lict because he had grown up with parents who constantly argued and often put him in the middle of their arguments. The director consistently overlooked discord among staff members until things would reach a boiling point. When the blow-up occurred, the director would be shocked and dismayed because he had truly perceived that everything was going smoothly among the staff. Recognizing perceptual blind spots can help people develop a clearer picture of reality.
4-4b. Attributions
As people organize what they perceive, they often draw conclusions based on their perception.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/avrwvud9w69wveux1469#GZDRRB6PKJENKX56X991) Attributions are judgments about what caused an event or behavior—(a) something about the person or (b) something about the situation. For example, many people attribute the success or failure of an organization to the top leader, when in reality there may be many factors that contribute to organizational performance. People also make attributions or judgments as a way to understand what caused their own or another person's behavior:
Projection the tendency to see one's own personal traits in other people
Projection the tendency to see one's own personal traits in other people
Projection the tendency to see one's own personal traits in other people
Perceptual defense the tendency to protect oneself by disregarding ideas, situations, or people that are unpleasant
Perceptual defense the tendency to protect oneself by disregarding ideas, situations, or people that are unpleasant
Perceptual defense the tendency to protect oneself by disregarding ideas, situations, or people that are unpleasant
Attributions
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 197/217
An internal attribution says characteristics of the person led to the behavior (“My subordinate missed the deadline because he's lazy and incompetent”).
An external attribution says something about the situation caused the person's behavior (“My subordinate missed the deadline because he didn't have the team support and resources he needed”).
This is a very brief introduction to the subject of attributions and their role in organizations. For a recent overview of the research on attributional theory and a special issue devoted to the topic, see Marie Dasborough, Paul Harvey, and Mark J. Martinko, “An Introduction to Attributional In�luences in Organizations,” Group & Organization Management 36, no. 4 (2011), pp. 419–426.
Attributions are important because they help people decide how to handle a situation. In the case of a subordinate missing a deadline, a leader who blames the mistake on the employee's personal characteristics might reprimand the person or, more effectively, provide additional training and direction. A leader who blames the mistake on external factors will try to help prevent such situations in the future, such as making sure team members have the resources they need, providing support to remove obstacles, and insuring that deadlines are realistic.
The Fundamental Attribution Error People tend to have biases that they apply when making attributions. When evaluating others, many people underestimate the in�luence of external factors and overestimate the in�luence of internal factors. This tendency is called the fundamental attribution error. Consider the case of someone being promoted to CEO. Employees, outsiders, and the media generally focus on the characteristics of the person that allowed him or her to achieve the promotion. In reality, however, the selection of that person might have been heavily in�luenced by external factors, such as business conditions creating a need for someone with a strong �inancial or marketing background at that particular time.
The Self-Serving Bias Another bias that distorts attributions involves attributions we make about our own behavior. People tend to overestimate the contribution of internal factors to their successes and overestimate the contribution of external factors to their failures. This tendency, called the self-serving bias , means people give themselves too much credit for what they do well and give external forces too much blame when they fail. Thus, if a leader's subordinates say she doesn't listen well enough,
judgments about what caused a person's behavior—either characteristics of the person or of the situation
Attributions judgments about what caused a person's behavior—either characteristics of the person or of the situation
Attributions judgments about what caused a person's behavior—either characteristics of the person or of the situation
fundamental attribution error the tendency to underestimate the in�luence of external factors on another's behavior and overestimate the in�luence of internal factors
fundamental attribution error the tendency to underestimate the in�luence of external factors on another's behavior and overestimate the in�luence of internal factors
fundamental attribution error the tendency to underestimate the in�luence of external factors on another's behavior and overestimate the in�luence of internal factors
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 198/217
and the leader thinks subordinates don't communicate well enough, the truth may actually lie somewhere in between. At Emerald Packaging, Kevin Kelly examined his attributions and improved his leadership effectiveness by overcoming the self- serving bias, as described in the following example.
In the Lead Kevin Kelly, Emerald Packaging
As the top leader of his family's California company, Emerald Packaging—a maker of plastic bags for the food industry— Kevin Kelly thought of himself as indispensable. He considered himself to be chief architect of the company's growing sales and pro�its. When Emerald began to falter, Kelly blamed it on his managers' resistance to new ideas that could keep the business thriving. He thought everyone needed to change except him.
For some time, Kelly's leadership approach was to reprimand and complain. Then, he decided to look at things in a different way. Was it really all his managers' fault? Realizing that everyone was under stress from several years of rapid growth, Kelly hired a pack of new managers to reinforce his exhausted troops. Surprisingly, though, things just seemed to get worse. Kelly had to face a hard truth: Rather than being the one person in the organization who didn't need to change, as Kelly had previously thought, he realized he was a big part of the problem.
Kelly sought consultants and classes to help boost his people skills. He began meeting regularly with veteran managers and new hires and implemented changes that successfully united the two groups into a cohesive team. Then, Kelly did something radical (at least for him). He took a real 10-day vacation, the �irst time he hadn't been in routine contact with Emerald since he took over the company. Visions of disaster �illed his head as he wondered how they could get along without him. As it turned out, people got along just �ine. Crises got solved, production continued, and customers didn't even seem to notice he was gone.
By examining his attributions and shifting his perception of himself, the organizational situation, and his managers' abilities, Kelly made changes that allowed his managers to �lourish and his company to grow even more successful.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/avrwvud9w69wveux1469#PPWJ79NPE3KP5RYBT895)
Kevin Kelly, “Branching Out,” Fortune Small Business (December 2005–January 2006), p. 39; and Kevin Kelly, “Take a Real Vacation,” Fortune Small Business (July– August 2006), p. 28.
self-serving bias the tendency to overestimate the in�luence of internal factors on one's successes and the in�luence of external factors on one's failures
self-serving bias the tendency to overestimate the in�luence of internal factors on one's successes and the in�luence of external factors on one's failures
self-serving bias the tendency to overestimate the in�luence of internal factors on one's successes and the in�luence of external factors on one's failures
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 199/217
4-5. Cognitive Differences The �inal area of individual differences we will explore is cognitive style. Cognitive style refers to how a person perceives, processes, interprets, and uses information. Thus, when we talk about cognitive differences, we are referring to varying approaches to perceiving and assimilating data, making decisions, solving problems, and relating to others.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#JEBUZGC3UX0T8PY6Z616) Cognitive approaches are preferences that are not necessarily rigid, but most people tend to have only a few preferred habits of thought. One of the most widely recognized cognitive differences is between what we call left-brained and right-brained thinking patterns.
Dorothy Leonard and Susaan Straus, “Putting Your Company's Whole Brain to Work,” Harvard Business Review (July–August 1997), pp. 111–121.
4-5a. Patterns of Thinking and Brain Dominance
Neurologists and psychologists have long known that the brain has two distinct hemispheres. Furthermore, science has shown that the left hemisphere controls movement on the body's right side and the right hemisphere controls movement on the left. In the 1960s and 1970s, scientists also discovered that the distinct hemispheres in�luence thinking, which led to an interest in what has been called left-brained versus right-brained thinking patterns. The left hemisphere is associated with logical, analytical thinking and a linear approach to problem solving, whereas the right hemisphere is associated with creative, intuitive, values-based thought processes.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#NYSLPVFHZ13G3SX6F369) A program sponsored by the New York City Economic Development Corporation illustrates the difference. Artists and other creative people are crucial to the vibrancy of the city, but most artists (right-brain thinking) don't know how to plan and run a business (left- brain skills) so they have a hard time supporting themselves. The city has invested $ 50,000 in a program to teach right-brain creative people the left-brain skills they need to turn their creative works into money.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#DRGJQJQ3E86VL5EK1263) As another simpli�ied example, people who are very good at verbal and written language (which involves a linear thinking process) are using the left brain, whereas those who prefer to interpret information through visual images are more right-brained.
Henry Mintzberg, “Planning on the Left Side and Managing on the Right,” Harvard Business Review (July–August 1976), pp. 49–57; Richard Restak, “The Hemispheres of the Brain Have Minds of Their Own,” The New York Times (January 25, 1976); and Robert Ornstein, The Psychology of Consciousness (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975).
Kate Taylor, “Creative Types, Learning to Be Business-Minded,” The New York Times (June 19, 2010), p. C1.
New Leader Action Memo
A simpli�ied exercise to help you think about your own preferences appears in Leader's Self-Insight 4.4. Before reading further, follow the instructions and complete the exercise to get an idea about your dominant thinking style according to Herrmann's whole brain model. Then read the following descriptions of each quadrant.
Although the concept of left-brained versus right-brained thinking is not entirely accurate physiologically (not all processes associated with left-brained thinking are located in the left hemisphere and vice versa), this concept provides a powerful
Cognitive style how a person perceives, processes, interprets, and uses information
Cognitive style how a person perceives, processes, interprets, and uses information
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 200/217
metaphor for two very different ways of thinking and decision making. It is also important to remember that everyone uses both left-brained and right-brained thinking, but to varying degrees.
More recently, these ideas have been broadened to what is called the whole brain concept .* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#ZQLL7JTCKNH7N7FFY973) Ned Herrmann began developing his concept of whole brain thinking while he was a manager at GE in the late 1970s and has expanded it through many years of research with thousands of individuals and organizations. The whole brain approach considers not only a person's preference for right-brained versus left-brained thinking but also for conceptual versus experiential thinking. Herrmann's whole brain model thus identi�ies four quadrants of the brain that are related to different thinking styles. Again, while not entirely accurate physiologically, the whole brain model is an excellent metaphor for understanding differences in thinking patterns. Some people strongly lean toward using one quadrant in most situations, whereas others rely on two, three, or even all four styles of thinking. An individual's preference for each of the four styles is determined through a survey called the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI), which has been administered to hundreds of thousands of individuals.
This discussion is based on Ned Herrmann, The Whole Brain Business Book (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996).
Leader's Self-Insight 4.4. What's Your Thinking Style?
Instructions: The following characteristics are associated with the four quadrants identi�ied by Herrmann's whole brain model. Think for a moment about how you approach problems and make decisions. In addition, consider how you typically approach your work or class assignments and how you interact with others. Circle 10 of the terms below that you believe best describe your own cognitive style. Try to be honest and select terms that apply to you as you are, not how you might like to be. There are no right or wrong answers.
A B C D Analytical Organized Friendly Holistic Factual Planned Receptive Imaginative Directive Controlled Enthusiastic Intuitive Rigorous Detailed Understanding Synthesizing Realistic Conservative Expressive Curious Intellectual Disciplined Empathetic Spontaneous Objective Practical Trusting Flexible Knowledgeable Industrious Sensitive Open-Minded Bright Persistent Passionate Conceptual Clear Implementer Humanistic Adventurous
The terms in column A are associated with logical, analytical thinking (quadrant A); those in column B with organized, detail-oriented thinking (quadrant B); those in column C with empathetic and emotionally based thinking (quadrant C); and those in column D with integrative and imaginative thinking (quadrant D). Do your preferences fall primarily in one of the four columns, or do you have a more balanced set of preferences across all four? If you have a strong preference in one particular quadrant, were you surprised by which one?
whole brain concept an approach that considers not only a person's preference for right-brained versus left-brained thinking, but also conceptual versus experiential thinking; identi�ies four quadrants of the brain related to different thinking styles
whole brain concept an approach that considers not only a person's preference for right-brained versus left-brained thinking, but also conceptual versus experiential thinking; identi�ies four quadrants of the brain related to different thinking styles
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 201/217
The whole brain model provides a useful overview of an individual's mental preferences, which in turn affect patterns of communication, behavior, and leadership.
Quadrant A is associated with logical thinking, analysis of facts, and processing numbers. A person who has a quadrant-A dominance is rational and realistic, thinks critically, and likes to deal with numbers and technical matters. Quadrant-A thinking might be thought of as the “scientist” part of the brain.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#AGJY24V156XMGUKUQ741) These people like to know how things work and to follow logical procedures. When a leader has a predominantly A-quadrant thinking style, he or she tends to be directive and authoritative. This leader focuses on tasks and activities and likes to deal with concrete information and facts. Opinions and feelings are generally not considered as important as facts.
This analogy is based on Peter Gloor, “To Become a Better Manager Stop Being a Manager,” Ivey Business Journal (March–April 2011), http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/the-organization/to-become-a-better-manager-stop-being-a-manager (http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/the-organization/to-become-a-better-manager-stop-being-a-manager) (accessed March 20, 2013).
Quadrant B deals with planning, organization of facts, and careful detailed review. A person who relies heavily on quadrant-B thinking is well-organized, reliable, and neat. This is the “manager” part of the brain.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#ZXZDELWK8F2DME8ZE663) These people like to establish plans and procedures and get things done on time. Leaders with a predominantly quadrant-B thinking style are typically conservative and highly traditional. They tend to avoid risks and strive for stability. Thus, they may insist on following rules and procedures, no matter what the circumstances are.
This analogy is based on Peter Gloor, “To Become a Better Manager Stop Being a Manager,” Ivey Business Journal (March–April 2011), http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/the-organization/to-become-a-better-manager-stop-being-a-manager (http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/the-organization/to-become-a-better-manager-stop-being-a-manager) (accessed March 20, 2013).
Quadrant C is associated with interpersonal relationships and affects intuitive and emotional thought processes. C-quadrant individuals are sensitive to others and enjoy interacting with and teaching others; hence this might be considered the “teacher” part of the brain.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#NCHE0G5SBMF691RSQ909) These people are typically emotional and expressive, outgoing, and supportive of others. Leaders with a predominantly quadrant-C style are friendly, trusting, and empathetic. They are concerned with people's feelings more than with tasks and procedures and may put emphasis on employee development and training.
Quadrant A the part of the brain associated in the whole brain model with logical thinking, analysis of facts, and processing numbers
Quadrant A the part of the brain associated in the whole brain model with logical thinking, analysis of facts, and processing numbers
Quadrant B the part of the brain associated in the whole brain model with planning, organizing facts, and careful, detailed review
Quadrant B the part of the brain associated in the whole brain model with planning, organizing facts, and careful, detailed review
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 202/217
This analogy is based on Peter Gloor, “To Become a Better Manager Stop Being a Manager,” Ivey Business Journal (March–April 2011), http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/the-organization/to-become-a-better-manager-stop-being-a-manager (http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/the-organization/to-become-a-better-manager-stop-being-a-manager) (accessed March 20, 2013).
Quadrant D is associated with conceptualizing, synthesizing, and integrating facts and patterns, with seeing the big picture rather than the details. This is the “artist” part of the brain.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#ZPEP6ZA4ASJGB57JV826) A person with a quadrant-D preference is visionary and imaginative, likes to speculate and break the rules, takes risks, and may be impulsive. These people are curious and enjoy experimentation and playfulness. The D-quadrant leader is holistic, imaginative, and entrepreneurial. This leader enjoys change, experimentation, and risk-taking and generally allows followers a great deal of freedom and �lexibility.
This analogy is based on Peter Gloor, “To Become a Better Manager Stop Being a Manager,” Ivey Business Journal (March–April 2011), http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/the-organization/to-become-a-better-manager-stop-being-a-manager (http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/the-organization/to-become-a-better-manager-stop-being-a-manager) (accessed March 20, 2013).
Exhibit 4.4 illustrates the model with its four quadrants and some of the mental processes associated with each. There is no style that is necessarily better or worse, though any of the styles carried to an extreme can be detrimental. Each style can have both positive and negative results for leaders and followers. It is important to remember that every individual, even those with a strong preference in one quadrant, actually has a coalition of preferences from each of the four quadrants.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#GAFJQX8NP6W0JUNVD968) Each of us has at least a few qualities of the scientist, manager, teacher, and artist.
Herrmann, The Whole Brain Business Book, p. 103.
Quadrant C the part of the brain associated in the whole brain model with interpersonal relationships and intuitive and emotional thought processes
Quadrant C the part of the brain associated in the whole brain model with interpersonal relationships and intuitive and emotional thought processes
Quadrant D the part of the brain associated in the whole brain model with conceptualizing, synthesizing, and integrating facts and patterns
Quadrant D the part of the brain associated in the whole brain model with conceptualizing, synthesizing, and integrating facts and patterns
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 203/217
Exhibit 4.4. Herrmann's Whole Brain Model
Source: Ned Herrmann, The Whole Brain Business Book (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996) p. 15.
In addition, Herrmann believes people can learn to use their “whole brain” rather than relying only on one or two quadrants. His research indicates that very few, if any, individuals can be wholly balanced among the four quadrants, but people can be aware of their preferences and engage in activities and experiences that help develop the other quadrants. Leaders who reach the top of organizations often have well-balanced brains, according to Herrmann's research. For example, Angela Ahrendts, who joined Apple as senior vice president for retail and online operations in 2014 after serving eight years as CEO of Burberry, uses a variety of thinking styles.
In the Lead Angela Ahrendts, Apple
It wasn't easy for Apple CEO Tim Cook to convince Angela Ahrendts to leave London and her top job at Burberry to come to work at Apple. But Cook knew her leadership was exactly what he needed to revitalize the retail division, integrate the retail and online operations, and expand the role of Apple stores to play a key social role in the communities they serve. “I visited Burberry stores and spent some time online. And you could tell that she got it at a deep level,” Cook says. He convinced Ahrendts to bring that ability to think broadly and deeply to Apple, where 60 percent of employees now work in the retail division.
As CEO of British company Burberry, Ahrendts led a stunning turnaround by using creative, holistic thinking (Quadrant D) to transform it from an outdated brand into a “technologically savvy international fashion powerhouse.” Another right-brain characteristic was her emphasis on building positive interpersonal relationships (Quadrant C). Yet Ahrendts also demonstrated left-brain thinking in her careful control of the company's �inances (Quadrant B) and her ability to be realistic, analytical, and rational when it came to making dif�icult decisions (Quadrant A). When the recession hit in 2008, Ahrendts quickly took charge, putting on hold plans for new stores, cutting $78 million in expenses, freezing salaries, and changing company procedures to be more cost-effective.
At Apple, Ahrendts started her new job by focusing on rebuilding morale and trust in a division that hadn't had a leader for more than a year after the previous manager had left after only �ive months. Morale and trust had suffered from both the turnover and some of the decisions that manager had made, such as cutting work hours and bene�its. Ahrendts put her right-brain skills to work on a listening tour, visiting the stores, call, centers, and back of�ices to answer questions, hear complaints, and reignite motivation and energy. As she did at Burberry, she is also using left-brain thinking to come up with ways to control �inances that don't damage trust and morale.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#BDTXSYPGKHF8DY4GE577)
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 204/217
Based on Nancy Hass, “Earning Her Stripes,” The Wall Street Journal Magazine (September 9, 2010), http://magazine.wsj.com/features/the-big- interview/earning-her-strips/ (http://magazine.wsj.com/features/the-big-interview/earning-her-strips/) (accessed March 20, 2013); and Jennifer Reingold, “What the Heck Is Angela Ahrendts Doing at Apple?” Fortune (September 15, 2015), pp. 100–108.
Ahrendts, who was listed as No. 16 on Fortune magazine's 2015 list of “Most Powerful Women,” re�lects the broad, balanced thinking style of a top leader. The typical CEO is a balanced thinker with at least two, usually three, and often four strong preferences and thus has a wide range of thinking options available to choose from. A broad range of thinking styles is particularly important at higher levels of organizations because leaders deal with a greater variety and complexity of people and issues.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#SYVZBDQZFK54U55PG924)
Herrmann, The Whole Brain Business Book, p. 179.
New Leader Action Memo
As a leader, you can strive for “whole brain” thinking to deal effectively with a wide variety of people and complex issues. You can be aware of your natural thinking patterns and include other perspectives that help you develop a broader understanding.
Understanding that individuals have different thinking styles can also help leaders be more effective in interacting with followers. Some leaders act as if everyone responds to the same material and behavior in the same way, but this isn't true. Some people prefer facts and �igures, whereas others want to know about relationships and patterns. Some followers prefer freedom and �lexibility, whereas others crave structure and order. Leaders can shift their styles and behaviors to more effectively communicate with followers and help them perform up to their full potential. Leaders can also recruit people with varied cognitive styles to help achieve important goals.
4-5b. Problem-Solving Styles: Jungian Types
Another approach to cognitive differences grew out of the work of psychologist Carl Jung. Jung believed that differences in individual behavior resulted from preferences in how we go about gathering and evaluating information for solving problems and making decisions.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#LCZKJQF2FNJB5X99M873) One of the most widely used tests in the United States, the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)™ assessment, is one way of measuring how individuals differ in these areas.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#EBWW96HFCEKVPDH2T338) The MBTI™ assessment has been taken by millions of people around the world and can help individuals better understand themselves and others.
Carl Jung, Psychological Types (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1923).
Otto Kroeger and Janet M. Thuesen, Type Talk (New York: Delacorte Press, 1988); Kroeger and Thuesen, Type Talk at Work (New York: Dell, 1992); “Conference Proceedings,” The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator and Leadership: An International Research Conference (January 12–14, 1994); and S. K. Hirsch, MBTI™ Team Member's Guide
Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)™ test that measures how individuals differ in gathering and evaluating information for solving problems and making decisions
Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)™ test that measures how individuals differ in gathering and evaluating information for solving problems and making decisions
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 205/217
(Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992).
The MBTI™ instrument uses four different pairs of attributes to classify people in one of 16 different personality types:
1. Introversion versus extroversion: This dimension focuses on where people gain interpersonal strength and mental energy. Extroverts (E) gain energy from being around others and interacting with others, whereas introverts (I) gain energy by focusing on personal thoughts and feelings.
2. Sensing versus intuition: This identi�ies how a person absorbs information. Those with a sensing preference (S) gather and absorb information through the �ive senses, whereas intuitive people (N) rely on less direct perceptions. Intuitives, for example, focus more on patterns, relationships, and hunches than on direct perception of facts and details.
3. Thinking versus feeling: This dimension relates to how much consideration a person gives to emotions in making a decision. Feeling types (F) tend to rely more on their values and sense of what is right and wrong, and they consider how a decision will affect other people's feelings. Thinking types (T) tend to rely more on logic and be very objective in decision making.
4. Judging versus perceiving: The judging versus perceiving dimension concerns an individual's attitudes toward ambiguity and how quickly a person makes a decision. People with a judging preference like certainty and closure. They enjoy having goals and deadlines and tend to make decisions quickly based on available data. Perceiving people, on the other hand, enjoy ambiguity, dislike deadlines, and may change their minds several times before making a �inal decision. Perceiving types like to gather a large amount of data and information before making a decision.
The various combinations of these preferences result in 16 unique types. There are a number of exercises available in print and on the Internet that can help people determine their preferences according to the MBTI™ assessment. Individuals develop unique strengths and weaknesses as a result of their preferences for introversion versus extroversion, sensing versus intuition, thinking versus feeling, and judging versus perceiving. As with the whole brain approach, MBTI™ types should not be considered ingrained or unalterable. People's awareness of their preferences, training, and life experiences can cause them to change their preferences over time.
Nearly 200 agencies of the U.S. government, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the Department of Veterans Affairs, have been reported to use the MBTI™ instrument as part of their training programs. Brian Twillman of the EPA says at least a quarter of the agency's 17,000 federal employees have taken the test, and that without it “there would be a lot of blind spots within the agency.”* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#XCXNS3FTN04GWFKJU098) A primary value of the MBTI™ assessment is that it starts an important dialogue about how people interact with others.
Reported in Lillian Cunningham, “Does It Pay to Know Your Type?” The Washington Post (December 14, 2012), http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-12- 14/national/35847528_1_personality-types-myers-briggs-type-indicator-�inancial-success (http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-12- 14/national/35847528_1_personality-types-myers-briggs-type-indicator-�inancial-success) (accessed March 20, 2013).
New Leader Action Memo
Go to Leader's Self-Insight 4.5 to complete an exercise that will identify your preferences for the four pairs of attributes identi�ied by the MBTI™ assessment.
At Hallmark Cards, top executives wanted to develop leaders who could see things from different perspectives, work together for everyone's success, and fully engage and inspire both employees and customers. One approach to creating that new culture was using the MBTI™ to give managers greater self-awareness and insight into how their patterns of thought and behavior affected others. “We tend to place people into ‘�iles’ according to our perceptions of them, which are often skewed,” said Mary Beth Ebmeyer, HR manager for corporate development.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#NEYVH3CVUPK0QYFA7677) By understanding different MBTI™ types, Hallmark leaders can �lex their communication style as needed and connect more meaningfully with employees. In addition, being aware of their own MBTI™ type enables leaders to maximize their strengths
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 206/217
and minimize their weaknesses. Leaders should remember that each type can have positive and negative consequences for behavior.
Example in Jennifer Overbo, “Using Myers–Briggs Personality Type to Create a Culture Adapted to the New Century,” T + D (February 2010), pp. 70–72.
Leader's Self-Insight 4.5. Personality Assessment: Jung's Typology
Instructions: For each item below, circle either “a” or “b.” In some cases, both “a” and “b” may apply to you. You should decide which is more like you, even if it is only slightly more true.
1. I would rather
a. Solve a new and complicated problem b. Work on something that I have done before
2. I like to
a. Work alone in a quiet place b. Be where “the action” is
3. I want a boss who
a. Establishes and applies criteria in decisions b. Considers individual needs and makes exceptions
4. When I work on a project, I
a. Like to �inish it and get some closure b. Often leave it open for possible change
5. When making a decision, the most important considerations are
a. Rational thoughts, ideas, and data b. People's feelings and values
6. On a project, I tend to
a. Think it over and over before deciding how to proceed b. Start working on it right away, thinking about it as I go along
7. When working on a project, I prefer to
a. Maintain as much control as possible b. Explore various options
8. In my work, I prefer to
a. Work on several projects at a time, and learn as much as possible about each one b. Have one project that is challenging and keeps me busy
9. I often
a. Make lists and plans whenever I start something and may hate to seriously alter my plans b. Avoid plans and just let things progress as I work on them
10. When discussing a problem with colleagues, it is easy for me
a. To see “the big picture” b. To grasp the speci�ics of the situation
11. When the phone rings in my of�ice or at home, I usually
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 207/217
a. Consider it an interruption b. Don't mind answering it
12. The word that describes me better is
a. Analytical b. Empathetic
13. When I am working on an assignment, I tend to
a. Work steadily and consistently b. Work in bursts of energy with “down time” in between
14. When I listen to someone talk on a subject, I usually try to
a. Relate it to my own experience and see if it �its b. Assess and analyze the message
15. When I come up with new ideas, I generally
a. “Go for it” b. Like to contemplate the ideas some more
16. When working on a project, I prefer to
a. Narrow the scope so it is clearly de�ined b. Broaden the scope to include related aspects
17. When I read something, I usually
a. Con�ine my thoughts to what is written there b. Read between the lines and relate the words to other ideas
18. When I have to make a decision in a hurry, I often
a. Feel uncomfortable and wish I had more information b. Am able to do so with available data
19. In a meeting, I tend to
a. Continue formulating my ideas as I talk about them b. Only speak out after I have carefully thought the issue through
20. In work, I prefer spending a great deal of time on issues of
a. Ideas b. People
21. In meetings, I am most often annoyed with people who
a. Come up with many sketchy ideas b. Lengthen the meeting with many practical details
22. I tend to be
a. A morning person b. A night owl
23. My style in preparing for a meeting is
a. To be willing to go in and be responsive b. To be fully prepared and sketch out an outline of the meeting
24. In meetings, I would prefer for people to
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 208/217
a. Display a fuller range of emotions b. Be more task oriented
25. I would rather work for an organization where
a. My job was intellectually stimulating b. I was committed to its goals and mission
26. On weekends, I tend to
a. Plan what I will do b. Just see what happens and decide as I go along
27. I am more
a. Outgoing b. Contemplative
28. I would rather work for a boss who is
a. Full of new ideas b. Practical
In the following, choose the word in each pair that appeals to you more:
29. a. Social b. Theoretical
30. a. Ingenuity b. Practicality
31. a. Organized b. Adaptable
32. a. Activity b. Concentration
Scoring
Count one point for each item listed below that you circled in the inventory.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 209/217
Scoring and Interpretation
The scores above measure variables similar to the MBTI™ assessment based on the work of psychologist Carl Jung. The MBTI™ assessment, which was described in this chapter, identi�ies four dimensions and 16 different “types.” The dominant characteristics associated with each dimension and each type are shown below. Remember that no one is a pure type; however, each person has preferences for introversion versus extroversion, sensing versus intuition, thinking versus feeling, and judging versus perceiving. Based on your scores on the survey, read the description of your dimension and type in the chart. Do you believe the description �its your personality?
Characteristics Associated with Each Dimension
Extroversion: Energized by outer world of people and objects, broad interests, thinks while speaking.
Introversion: Energized by inner world of thoughts and ideas, deep interests, thinks before speaking.
Sensing: Likes facts, details, and practical solutions. Intuition: Likes meanings, theory, associations among data, and possibilities.
Thinking: Makes decisions by analysis, logic, and impersonal criteria.
Feeling: Makes decisions based on values, beliefs, and concern for others.
Judging: Lives life organized, stable, systematic, and under control.
Perceiving: Lets life happen, spontaneous, open-ended, last minute.
Characteristics Associated with Each Type
ISTJ: Organizer, trustworthy, responsible, good trustee or inspector.
ISFJ: Quiet, conscientious, devoted, handles detail, good conservator.
INFJ: Perseveres, inspirational, quiet caring for others, good counselor.
INTJ: Independent thinker, skeptical, theory, competence, good scientist.
ISTP: Cool, observant, easy-going, good craftsperson.
ISFP: Warm, sensitive, team player, avoids con�lict, good artist.
INFP: Idealistic, strong values, likes learning, good at noble service.
INTP: Designer, logical, conceptual, likes challenges, good architect.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 210/217
ESTP: Spontaneous, gregarious, good at problem solving and promoting.
ESFP: Sociable, generous, makes things fun, good as entertainer.
ENFP: Imaginative, enthusiastic, starts projects, good champion.
ENTP: Resourceful, stimulating, dislikes routine, tests limits, good inventor.
ESTJ: Order, structure, practical, good administrator or supervisor.
ESFJ: People skills, harmonizer, popular, does things for people, good host.
ENFJ: Charismatic, persuasive, �luent presenter, sociable, active, good teacher.
ENTJ: Visionary planner, takes charge, hearty speaker, natural leader.
Source: From Organizational Behavior: Experience and Cases, 4th ed., by Dorothy Marcic. © 1995. Reprinted with permission of South- Western, a division of Thomson Learning: http://www.thomsonrights.com (http://www.thomsonrights.com) . Fax: 800-730-2215.
There has been an increasing application of the MBTI™ assessment in leadership studies.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/jetxb20a50y80sudy236#UKJAJHHN9RJL19NVC521) These studies con�irm that there is no “leader type,” and all 16 of the MBTI™ types can function effectively as leaders. As with the four quadrants of the whole brain model, leaders can learn to use their preferences and balance their approaches to best suit followers and the situation. However, research reveals some interesting, although tentative, �indings. For example, although extroversion is often considered an important trait for a leader, leaders in the real world are about equally divided between extroverts and introverts. In regard to the sensing versus intuition dimension, data reveal that sensing types are in the majority in �ields where the focus is on the immediate and tangible (e.g., construction, banking, manufacturing). However, in areas that involve breaking new ground or long-range planning, intuitive leaders are in the majority. Thinking (as opposed to feeling) types are more common among leaders in business and industry as well as in the realm of science. In addition, thinking types appear to be chosen more often as managers even in organizations that value “feeling,” such as counseling centers. Finally, one of the most consistent �indings is that judging types are in the majority among the leaders studied.
Based on Mary H. McCaulley, “Research on the MBTI™ and Leadership: Taking the Critical First Step,” Keynote Address, The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator and Leadership: An International Research Conference (January 12–14, 1994).
Thus, based on the limited research, the two preferences that seem to be most strongly associated with successful leadership are thinking and judging. However, this doesn't mean that people with other preferences cannot be effective leaders. Much more research needs to be done before any conclusions can be reached about the relationship between MBTI™ types and leadership.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 211/217
4-6. Working with Different Personality Types As this chapter has shown, leaders have to work with individuals who differ in many ways. Personality differences, in particular, can make the life of a leader interesting and sometimes exasperating. These differences can create an innovative environment but also lead to stress, con�lict, and negative feelings.
Leaders can learn to work more effectively with different personality types by following some simple guidelines.* (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/f�kw3ds79a8vgmunm073#XSTMK4BFLG4NKHL95385)
These techniques are based on Jamie Walters and Sarah Fenson, “Building Rapport with Different Personalities,” Inc.com (March 2000), http://www.inc.com/articles/2000/03/17713.html (http://www.inc.com/articles/2000/03/17713.html) ; Tim Millett, “Learning to Work with Different Personality Types,” http://ezinearticles.com/?Learning-To-Work-With-Different-Personality-Types&id=725606 (http://ezinearticles.com/?Learning-To-Work-With-Different- Personality-Types&id=725606) ; and Carol Ritberter, “Understanding Personality: The Secret to Managing People,” http://www.dreammanifesto.com/understanding- personality-the-secret-of-managing-people.html (http://www.dreammanifesto.com/understanding-personality-the-secret-of-managing-people.html) (accessed April 17, 2008).
Understand your own personality and how you react to others. Avoid judging people based on limited knowledge, and realize that everyone has different facets to their personality. Learn to control your frustration to help you keep different personality types focused on the goal and the tasks needed to reach it.
Treat everyone with respect. People like to be accepted and appreciated for who they are. Even if you �ind someone's personality grating, remain professional and keep your irritation to yourself. Don't gossip or joke about others.
Acknowledge each person's strengths. Everyone wants to be recognized for their unique talents, so be sure to acknowledge and make use of people's useful personality characteristics. For instance, a pessimistic person can be dif�icult to be around, but these gloomy folks can sometimes be helpful by calling attention to legitimate problems with an idea or plan.
Strive for understanding. A good approach to take with a personality type widely different from yours is to clarify questions every time there's a potential for miscommunication. Follow up each question or request with a statement explaining why you asked and how it will bene�it the organization as well as the individual.
Remember that everyone wants to �it in. No matter their personalities, people typically take on behavior patterns that are the norm for their environment. Leaders can create norms that keep everyone focused on positive interactions and high performance.
Occasional personality con�licts are probably inevitable in any group or organization, but by using these techniques, leaders can generally keep the work environment positive and productive.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 212/217
Leadership Essentials This chapter explored the importance of self-awareness and some of the individual differences that affect leaders and the leadership process. Individuals differ in many ways, including personality, values and attitudes, and styles of thinking and decision making.
One model of personality, the Big Five personality dimensions, examines whether individuals score high or low on the dimensions of extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience. Although there is some indication that a high degree of each of the personality dimensions is associated with successful leadership, individuals who score low on various dimensions may also be effective leaders. Two speci�ic personality traits that have a signi�icant impact on leader behavior are locus of control and authoritarianism.
Values are fundamental beliefs that cause a person to prefer that things be done one way rather than another. One way to think about values is in terms of instrumental and end values. End values are beliefs about the kinds of goals that are worth pursuing, whereas instrumental values are beliefs about the types of behavior that are appropriate for reaching goals. Values also affect an individual's attitudes. A leader's attitudes about self and others in�luence how the leader behaves toward and interacts with followers. Two sets of assumptions called Theory X and Theory Y represent two very different sets of attitudes leaders may hold about people in general.
Differences in personality, values, and attitudes in�luence perception, which is the process people use to select, organize, and interpret information. Perceptual distortions include stereotyping, the halo effect, projection, and perceptual defense. Attributions refer to how people explain the causes of events or behaviors. Based on their perception, people may make either internal or external attributions.
Another area of individual differences is cognitive style. The whole brain concept explores a person's preferences for right-brained versus left-brained thinking and for conceptual versus experiential thinking. The model provides a powerful metaphor for understanding differences in thinking styles. Individuals can learn to use their “whole brain” rather than relying on one thinking style. Another way of looking at cognitive differences is the MBTI™, which measures an individual's preferences for introversion versus extroversion, sensing versus intuition, thinking versus feeling, and judging versus perceiving.
Finally, the chapter offered some tips for how leaders can work more effectively with varied personality types. By understanding their own personalities, treating everyone with respect, recognizing people's unique abilities, circumventing communication breakdowns, and creating a positive environment, leaders can better keep diverse people productive and focused on goals instead of personality differences.
Discussion Questions 1. Do you agree that self-awareness is essential for being a good leader? Can you think of some speci�ic negative consequences that might result from a leader not having self-awareness?
2. Extroversion is often considered a “good” quality for a leader to have. Why might introversion be considered an equally positive quality?
3. A survey found that 79 percent of CEOs surveyed fall into the category of being “highly optimistic,” whereas a much lower percentage of chief �inancial of�icers were rated as highly optimistic. Do you think these differences re�lect personality characteristics or the different requirements of the two jobs? Discuss.
4. The chapter suggests that one way to work effectively with different personalities is to treat everyone with respect. How might a leader deal with a subordinate who is perpetually rude, insensitive, and disrespectful to others?
5. What might be some reasons the dimension of “openness to experience” correlates so strongly with historians' ratings of the greatest U.S. presidents but has been less strongly associated with business leader success? Do you think this personality dimension might be more important for business leaders of today than it was in the past? Discuss.
6. Leaders in many of today's organizations use the results of personality testing to make hiring and promotion decisions. Discuss some of the pros and cons of this approach.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 213/217
7. From Leader's Self-Insight 4.3, identify four or �ive values (instrumental or end values) that could be a source of con�lict between leaders and followers. Explain.
8. Do you believe understanding your preferences according to the whole brain model can help you be a better leader? Discuss.
9. How can a leader use an understanding of brain dominance to improve the functioning of the organization?
10. Hallmark Cards discovered that its mid- and upper-level managers were primarily thinking types, but top executives displayed primarily feeling preferences. Why do you think this might be?
Leadership at Work
Past and Future
Draw a life line below that marks high and low experiences during your life. Think of key decisions, de�ining moments, peak experiences, and major disappointments that shaped who you are today. Draw the line from left to right, and identify each high and low point with a word or two.
Birth Year: Today's Date:
What made these valued experiences? How did they shape who you are today?
Now take the long view of your life. In 10-year increments, write below the leader experiences you want to have. Provide a brief past-tense description of each decade (e.g., next 10 years—big starting salary, bored in �irst job, promoted to middle management).
Next 10 years:
Following 10 years:
Following 10 years:
Following 10 years:
What personal skills and strengths will you use to achieve the future?
What is your core life purpose or theme as expressed in the life line and answers above?
What would your desired future self say to your present self?
How do your answers above relate to your scores on the Leader Self-Insight questionnaires you completed in this chapter?
Leadership Development: Cases for Analysis
A Nice Manager
Chisum Industries' management promotion process was a benchmark for providing lateral moves as well as promotion to the next level within the company. With of�ices, plants, and warehouses located in seven Texas cities, opportunities for the best and brightest were extensive for middle management employees. The process invited candidates to explore goals, strengths, and weaknesses and to recount real-life scenarios and accomplishments. The selection team also visited the worksites of candidates for on-the-job observations and talks with fellow workers before bringing the �inal candidates to Dallas for interviews. The process offered personal insight and growth opportunities to all candidates for promotion. In March 2015, top management, including Marcus Chisum, Karl Jacobson, Mitch Ivey, Wayne Hughes, and Barbara Kennedy, were midway through a meeting to consider which of four middle management candidates to promote to the top position in the San Antonio of�ice.
Marcus:
“Who do we have next?”
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 214/217
Barbara:
“Harry Creighton.” Scanning the group, Marcus sees a few nods and a shrug.
Marcus:
“Feedback?”
Karl and Wayne, simultaneously:
“Great guy.”
Karl:
“We all know that Harry came into a situation in which that particular location was suffering a drop in performance. Morale was low and there were rumors of layoffs. He came in and calmed employee fears and has done a good job of raising performance levels.”
Wayne:
“He has a great relationship with employees. As we went around and talked to people, it was obvious that he has developed a level of trust and a vision that workers buy into.”
Barbara:
“The word that kept coming up among the workers was ‘nice.’” As was his habit during meetings, Mitch leaned back in his chair, tapping his pencil on the table. Initially annoyed by the habit, over time the team had gotten used to the sound.
Marcus:
“Mitch, your initial reaction to his name was a shrug. What are you thinking?”
Mitch:
“Just wondering if nice is what we're looking for here?” The remark was met with laughter. “Tell me, how does a manager achieve an across-the-board reputation as a nice guy? I've worked for and with a number of managers during my life. I respected them, thought many of them were fair and up-front in their treatment of us; thought some were jerks who should be canned …”
Marcus:
“I hope I don't fall into that last category.” (Laughter)
Mitch:
“I don't recall any consensus about a manager being nice.”
Karl:
“Several people mentioned that Harry always has their back.”
Barbara:
“I got the impression that Harry covers for them.”
Marcus:
“Meaning what?”
Wayne:
“Meaning, giving them some slack when it comes to things like overlooking their weaknesses, a little sloppiness with deadlines or taking time off.”
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 215/217
Barbara:
“Several mentioned that he's always willing to … let me look at my notes … ‘Always willing to step in and help out.’ The phrase came up more than a few times and when I pressed them, they didn't elaborate. But I wondered …”
Karl:
“ … Is he managing or taking on some of their responsibilities?”
Barbara:
“Exactly.”
Mitch:
“It's bothering me that he comes across as the parent who does his kid's project for the science fair.”
Wayne:
“I don't think it's that bad, but when you look at him in comparison with the other candidates, it makes me question whether he can take on the tough part of top management. There is nothing distinctive about him or his style.”
Karl:
“There's no edge here. No sense of boundaries. Does he want to manage employees or be popular with them? Can he say ‘No’ and mean it?”
Barbara:
“Does Harry have the capability to walk that �ine line that separates leaders; that distinguishes respect versus popularity or encouragement and support over stepping in and helping out?”
Marcus:
“So, we see some good things about Harry. He has a lot of potential. But we also see that he has not yet reached a level where we can entrust him with this top management position. Our task here, then, is to move on with the selection process, but over the next weeks I would like for us to consider ways to help Harry reach that potential for future opportunities.”
Questions 1. What does nice mean to you? Do you think nice is a good trait for leaders or the kiss of death?
2. Is nice related to any concepts in the chapter, such as one of the big �ive personality dimensions, Myers–Briggs components, or left–right brain dominance? Discuss.
3. If Harry is passed over for promotion, what feedback and advice would you give him about how to improve his leadership skills for possible future promotion?
Environmental Designs International
When Lee Keiko returned from a quick lunch, she scanned her e-mail inbox for the message she had been dreading. She found it, labeled “high priority,” among a dozen other e-mails and sank back in her chair as she mentally prepared to open it. Keiko felt a tightening in her stomach as she clicked on the message and braced herself for the assault she had grown to expect from Barry Carver, her boss at Environmental Designs International (EDI), a rapidly growing “green” company that specializes in retro�itting commercial buildings to improve their energy ef�iciency.
The primary clients of EDI are owners of skyscrapers who renovate their buildings to reduce energy use and cut down on greenhouse gas emissions, a contributor to global warming. Within these towering skyscrapers, the largest energy guzzlers are lighting, cooling, and heating. Owners of New York City's Empire State Building expect to reduce the skyscraper's energy use by 38 percent within �ive years at an annual savings of $ 4.4 million after this 78-year-old building is retro�itted.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 216/217
Keiko had expected Carver's scathing e-mail and knew he would lambaste her and her team for missing last Friday's deadline for submitting a proposal to retro�it a 60-story Chicago skyscraper to meet new federal green standards. Keiko had warned Carver of the possible delay in completing the proposal due to changing federal regulations for energy ef�iciency. It was truly out of her hands. She had even consulted with the client to alert them of the delay, and they had agreed to an extended deadline.
Nevertheless, Carver was angry about the delay and �ired off an e-mail that was brusque and insensitive. “I depend on you to meet deadlines and work effectively with regulatory agencies. Your ineptness may cost us this important project,” he exclaimed in his e-mail to Keiko. “Why aren't you as committed to this project as I am? I can't do this alone,” he stated. This was one more example of how Carver often made life miserable for his subordinates, verbally attacking them to get results. Carver had also started alienating his peers. During a recent meeting to discuss the replacement of thousands of windows in the Chicago skyscraper, Carver embarrassed a colleague by accusing him of selecting a vendor without doing a price comparison among vendors. “How can I value your recommendation, Troy, if you fail to do your homework? I need new prices by Friday!” shouted Carver.
Carver was a highly skilled architect and responsible for managing a team of designers in EDI's Chicago of�ice. Although his abrupt personality had helped him climb the corporate ladder, his intimidating communication style was beginning to create problems and hamper his ability to get results. Carver learned in his performance review that his work relationships were suffering and the complaints about him were increasing. Even his long-time peers were avoiding him as much as possible and �inding ways to work around him.
Sensitive to the growing animosity toward him, Carver began to reconsider how he interacted with his staff and peers. He felt motivated to begin using some of the tools he had recently learned in the executive education course he had just completed. During one of the skills-assessment activities, Carver learned that he could get better results by communicating more gently, building consensus, and working in a more team-oriented manner. Further, he realized he had to �ind ways to handle his anger and frustration when dealing with federal regulatory agencies and the inevitable delays that hampered progress on big construction projects. As he thought about the skills assessment, Carver wondered if he could soften his image and perhaps even be considered for a senior management position he was eyeing in EDI's Los Angeles of�ice.
Questions 1. “At the senior management level, you get hired for competence. You get �ired for personality.” In your opinion, is this statement true or false? How does it relate to Barry Carver and his current leadership style?
2. Identify the behaviors described in this case that were damaging to Barry Carver's work relationships. Why would a manager behave this way? What negative consequences did these behaviors have on his peers and subordinates?
3. How realistic is it that Carver (or anyone) can change his own leadership skills? What kind of help might he need?
Sources: Based on information in Gerry Yemen, Erika H. James, and James G. Clawson, “Nicholas Gray: The More Things Change …,” (Darden Business Publishing, University of Virginia, Copyright 2003; and Mireya Navarro, “The Empire State Building Plans a Growth Spurt, Environmentally,” The New York Times (April 7, 2009), p. A25.
3/21/2019 Print
https://content.ashford.edu/print/Daft.0283.17.2?sections=lcrnz6tfvegpyahf9281,title,copyright,dedication,qmyl17qqphx14fue3436,lavb3jr16l86m… 217/217
Chapter 5 . Leadership Mind and Emotion
Your Leadership Challenge After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
Recognize how mental models guide your behavior and relationships. Engage in independent thinking by staying mentally alert, thinking critically, and being mindful rather than mindless. Break out of categorized thinking patterns and open your mind to new ideas and multiple perspectives. Begin to apply systems thinking and personal mastery to your activities at school or work. Exercise emotional intelligence, including being self-aware, managing your emotions, motivating yourself, displaying empathy, and managing relationships. Apply the difference between motivating others based on fear and motivating others based on love.
As Lieutenant Colonel Howard Olson surveys the crowd before him, he knows that most of the people in the room outrank him. Still, Olson opens his talk with the following statement: “Each and every one of you has something that makes you a jerk…. Some of you have more than one. I know. I've talked to you.”
The lecture is part of what the U.S. Army informally calls “charm school,” a week-long course held annually for the select few who are promoted to brigadier general. Everyone knows about the Army's skill at getting new recruits in boot camp to think and act in a new way, but few people have seen �irsthand the training it uses to get high-ranking of�icers to make a mental and emotional leap. At charm school, new generals are advised to get in touch with their inner jerk and work on overcoming that aspect of their personality. Charm school is designed as a reminder that the great of�icers are those who genuinely care about their soldiers. Other recurring themes during the training include avoiding even the appearance of ethical violations, leading with moral courage, and overcoming arrogance, the “�irst deadly sin of the general of�icer.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/cmfng8elqpp175pxr282#JYPZCQV2HH14GAQDC636)
Thomas E. Ricks, “Charmed Forces: Army's ‘Baby Generals’ Take a Crash Course in Sensitivity Training,” The Wall Street Journal (January 19, 1998), p. A1.
There's no equivalent training in corporate America, but the lessons taught at the Army's charm school are also being taken to heart at many of today's business organizations, where leaders are learning to build work relationships based on trust, humility, caring, and respect.
This chapter and the next examine current thinking about the importance of leaders becoming fully integrated people by exploring the full capacities of their minds, emotions, and spirits. Noted leadership author and scholar Warren Bennis has said that “there's no difference between being a really effective leader and becoming a fully integrated person.” * (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Daft.0283.17.2/sections/cmfng8elqpp175pxr282#JDJM9M0YRT9JKGJDN201) This chapter �irst examines the importance of leading with both head and heart (mind and emotion). Then we expand on some of the ideas introduced in the previous chapter to consider how the ability to shift our thinking and feeling can help leaders alter their behavior, in�luence others, and be more effective. We discuss the concept