Term paper
ENGL 118: Term Paper Rubric (Assessment of Written Report) Sem.382
|
Criteria |
Mark |
Level Descriptor |
Mark Awarded |
||||
|
Paper lay-out |
2 |
Paper layout correct and complete. Interesting, creative development.
Points possible 2-1.5 |
Layout complete and descriptive. Logical. Required information.
Points possible 1-0.5 |
Basic layout, without clarifying content. Distinct paragraphs introduce new idea. Points possible 0.5-0.1 |
Poor layout without different sections. No main or sub-headings.
Points possible 0 |
|
|
|
Writing: Clarity of writing |
2 |
Accurate sentence structure. Sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs make the writer’s points easy to follow.
Points possible 1.5 - 2 |
Sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs make the writer’s points easy to follow, even though some sentences not correctly structured.
Points possible 0.5 - 1 |
Sentence structure and/or word choice sometimes interfere with clarity. Needs to improve sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs to make the writing easy to follow.
Points possible 0.5 |
Incorrect sentence structure and word choice. Lack of transitions and/or sequencing of ideas makes reading and understanding difficult. No coherence.
Points possible 0 |
|
|
|
Content/ Plagiarism |
10 |
ALL content original OR cited correctly. Interpreted and commented on.
Points possible 10 |
-1 for each sentence taken from source and not properly cited (plagiarized) up to total 10. |
Paper not according to student’s own writing style. (Check and compare quiz 1, 2 and MT). ** |
|
||
|
Critical thinking and creativity |
2 |
Sources analysed and results synthesized correctly; presented in creative logical way.
Points possible 1.5 - 2 |
Sources analysed and synthesized correctly. Results presented in logical way.
Points possible 0.5 - 1 |
Sources analysed correctly but separate synthesis or presented in separate paragraphs. Little cohesion between analysis and synthesis. Points possible 0 – 0.5 |
Sources not analysed, just reproduced given text.
Points possible 0 |
|
|
|
In-text referencing |
6 |
Used sources correctly in text for EACH reference.
Points possible 5.5 - 6 |
Used sources in text. Up to 50% deviation from APA referencing techniques. Points possible 4.5 -5 |
More than 50% deviation from APA referencing techniques. Points possible 3.5 - 4 |
Work fails to follow required report format.
Points possible 0 – 3 |
|
|
|
Use of Figures, Graphs, Charts, Tables & Drawings |
4 |
All figures and tables are effectively interpreted and discussed in report; and labelled or titled correctly in accordance with department requirements.
Points possible 4-3.5 |
Minor departures from required format. Captions effectively communicate content. Figures and tables clearly interpreted and important features noted.
Points possible 3.4-2.5 |
Many departures from required format. Captions are ineffective in communicating content. Many figures not interpreted. Important features not communicated or understood. Points possible 2.4-1 |
Work fails to follow required format. Captions, figures and tables are not used effectively or not included at all. Little understanding of important features or issues. Points possible 0 |
|
|
|
Reference List |
6 |
Reference section complete, comprehensive and follows required format. One or two errors. Points possible 6-5 |
Minor inadequacies in references or inconsistencies in format.
Points possible 4-3 |
Inadequate list of references or failure to follow required format.
Points possible 2-1 |
Attempted reference list; incorrect format. Points possible 1 |
No referencing system used. Points possible 0 |
|
|
Language Accuracy (Spelling, Grammar, & Mechanics) |
8 |
Academic language used. NO contractions. Correct word choice. ONLY typographical errors. Formal and correct tone and style.
Points possible 6.5 - 8 |
Mostly spelling errors. Acceptable tone and style. Errors do not impede meaning.
Less than 10 major errors
Points possible 5 - 6 |
Errors indicative of poor grammar knowledge. Incomplete sentences.
10 to 20 major errors
Points possible 3 – 5.5 |
Language almost incomprehensible
More than 20 errors
Points possible 0 -2.5 |
|
|
|
Overall Performance Total marks= /40 |
/20 |
**In addition, you must give your instructor the following documents: ___________________________________
Printed copies of source documents, properly annotated as instructed in class. (See Blackboard for examples).
1 source card for EACH source document with correct APA formatting. (See Blackboard for examples).
Minimum of 4 note cards per student author, correctly written as instructed in class. (See Blackboard for examples).
**No marks are given for these documents.
ENGL118 English Composition II Semester 382