I had attach the question below.

Excellent Above Average Average Below Average Unacceptable Points 6 5 3 2 0 Cultural Considerations

Achieves a score of 5 and discusses how an individual could/should adjust his/her actions to successfully interact with someone from another culture.

Achieves a score of 3 and is able to compare and contrast his/her own culture with another culture.

Achieves a score of 2, and discusses some significant characteristics of another culture.

Student discusses how his/her own culture has shapes his/her identity and world view.

Student does not discuss how one's own culture has shaped his/her identity and world view.

Civic Responsibility

Achieves a score of 5 and discusses the purpose and/or benefits of civic engagament (i.e. meeting civic responsibilities).

Achieves a score of 3 and describes effective participation in civic engagement activities.

Achieves a score of 2 and discusses actions an individual should take to address pertinent issues within one's community.

Recognizes and discusses his/her civic responsibilties to a specific community.

Student does not recognize his/her responsibility to a community.

Civic Responsibility and Culture

Achieves a score of 5 and discusses the importance of civic engagament in a multicultural society.

Achieves a score of 3 and considers ways civic engagement can ease intercultural tensions.

Student identifies the relationship between civic engagement and culture and identifies a potential conflict between the two.

Student briefly considers the relationship between civic engagement and culture.

Student does not consider the relationship between civic engagement and culture.

Philosophical Engagement

The student makes significant reference to at least two thinkers disucessed in the course so far in their paper.

The student makes significant reference to at least one thinker and limited reference to another thinker discussed in the course so far.

The student makes limited reference to two thinkers discussed in the course so far or significant reference to a single thinker.

The student makes limited reference to one thinker discussed in the course.

The student makes no reference to any thinkers discussed in the course so far.

Structure and Clarity

The paper is clearly structured, with an introduction, several body paragraphs, and a clear conclusion. Paragraph breaks make sense and use transitions. All sentences are complete and grammatical. All words are used correctly. Paper has been spell- checked and proofread, and has no errors.

The paper is clearly structured, with an introduction, several body paragraphs, and a clear conclusion. Paragraph breaks make sense and use transitions. All sentences are complete and grammatical. All words are used correctly. Paper has been spell- checked and proofread, and has no errors.

There is a clear introduction and conclusion, but few paragraph breaks in the body and little use of transitions. Sentences are mostly complete and grammatical. Most words are used correctly. Paper has been spell-checked and proofread, and has very few minor errors.

The paper lacks either an introduction or a conclusion, or the body is a single paragraph. Several sentences are incomplete and/or ungrammatical. Many words are used incorrectly. Paper has several spelling errors.

There is no structure. The paper is a single paragraph. Many sentences are incomplete and/or ungrammatical. Paper has many spelling errors. Many words are used incorrectly. Reading is difficult due to lack of proper grammar and syntax.

Prof. Norwood's Term Paper Rubric