Persuasive term paper
|
Term Paper Health Law & Ethics |
|||||
|
|
“A” Paper |
“B” Paper |
“C” Paper |
“D/F” Paper |
Total Points |
|
CLARITY & INTENTION
(30) |
· Takes a clear position and supports it consistently with well-chosen reasons and/or examples; may use persuasive strategy to convey an argument. · Original thought or approach. · Demonstrates a clear intention that is responsive to the assigned task. · Contextualizes the topic or texts to be analyzed. |
· Takes a clear position and supports it with relevant reasons and/or examples through much of the essay · Demonstrates an adequate focus on assigned task. · Argument is fairly obvious, clear, and concise. |
· Takes a clear position and supports it with some relevant reasons and/or examples; there is some development of the essay, overall the essay is underdeveloped. · Demonstrates an attempt to answer assigned task, but is vague and is made of statements rather than arguments. |
· Takes a position and provides uneven support; may lack development in parts or be repetitive OR essay is no more than a well-written beginning. · Position is unclear and provides minimal to no support, may only paraphrase the prompt. · Demonstrates minimal attention to the assigned task. · Paper makes no argument and has no direction. |
|
|
CONTENT DEVELOPMENT
(25) |
· Content explores complex ideas that are used to shape compelling work. · Provides ample evidence to support arguments. · Employs logical and smooth writing. |
· Content demonstrates consideration of new ideas that are used to shape solid work. · Provides some, but not enough, evidence to support main point. · Somewhat logical, but at times wanders. |
· Content demonstrates attention to simple ideas that are evident in the work. · Student did not master the material due to shallow researching and careless reading. · Difficult to follow, full of digressions. |
· Content demonstrates consideration of simple ideas that are evident in some elements of the paper. · Thoughts are unclear and unconnected. |
|
|
STRUCTURE & ORGANIZATION
(20) |
· Careful statement of thesis. · Strong topic sentences and paragraph connections. · Compelling conclusion organically following from the earlier ideas expanded in the paper. |
· Contextualizes the topic and text to be analyzed. Uneven in paragraph construction and connections. · Conclusion does not support thesis very well. |
· Paper does not provide context. Paragraphs do not have topic sentences and are randomly organized. · Conclusion is weak and hastily added at the end of the paper. |
· There is no opening paragraph or thesis. Paragraphs and sentences are disjointed. · No conclusion. |
|
|
RESEARCH & USE OF SOURCES
(15) |
· Skillfully uses at least five scholarly sources that do not always agree. · Cites primary sources as evidence to support well developed ideas. |
· Competently uses at least five relevant scholarly sources that all agree with each other and cites primary sources as evidence to support well‐developed ideas. |
· Uses less than five scholarly sources that all agree with each other. · Sources sometimes are not relevant. · Often relies on personal assumptions not based on evidence. |
· Attempts to use some sources and evidence to support ideas, but mostly relies on personal assumptions. |
|
|
LANGUGAGE & FORMATTING
(10) |
· Careful editing; · Proper margins, spacing, footnoting, quotations, pagination and bibliographical citations using APA Style. · Flawless spelling, grammar, typography and punctuation. Respects required length specified in assignment. · Written in own words. · Uses information and sources ethically and legally. |
· Some spelling and grammatical errors. · Respects required length specified in assignment. · Adequate use of APA Style. · Written in own words. · Uses information/sources ethically and legally.
|
· Use of slang, colloquial expressions or other informal speech. · Many spelling and grammatical errors. · Poor or no use APA Style · May not follows assignment plan and has poor or no transitions. ·
|
· Length of paper is significantly shorter than required in the assignment. · Language is informal, not respecting the standards of an academic paper. · Numerous spelling, grammatical, and typographical errors. · Very Poor or no use of APA
|
|
|
100 |
100-90 |
89-80 |
79-70 |
69-0 |
|
Comments: