Final paper

1

5

Saud ALriyami

Dr. Victoria S. Pando

ELA-350V-

October 19, 2017

PLSI & Temperament

PLSI results can clearly provide much sensitive information regarding different types of characters that are possessed by an individual. According to my view and analysis, my PLSI results clearly revolves around being extrovert, sensate, thicker and judger. First and for most being an extrovert person brings on board so much information regarding the kind of a person that I am right from my character to my ways of action. Apparently, I am a kind of an individual that can be described as an outgoing simply because in very many occasions I have always found myself attending several social events including parties with my friends. This clearly shows how attached I am when it comes to living a social life thus ‘Extrovert’ is the best word that can be used to describe this situation which falls under PLSI results.

In addition, when it comes to being a ‘sensate’ kind of a person, this is where I can prove it beyond no reasonable doubt that I am that kind of a person who is always perceived by various types of senses which has gone further to affect both my way of thinking and my actions under certain conditions. Being sensate has made me to be more realistic when it comes to dealing with specific types of issues either directly or indirectly (Shindler, 2009). My PLSI results about being a thicker person eventually reveals my actions when it comes to carrying out unfair activities. Lastly, my PLSI results on being a ‘judger’ shows what type of a person I am in terms of making serious conclusions which are always relevant and fair at all costs. In addition, I feel that being a judger has made me to be more time conscious in terms of coming up with the right decision that is able to bring a positive impact in various situations involving decision making processes.

When it comes to temperaments, it is much clear that different people are capable of having different natures. Throughout the entire history, different people in different professions have been able to come up with a conclusion that there are some four specific distinct ‘natures’ into which each and every individual can be able to fit in. In addition, David Keirsey who was one of the greatest psychologists was deeply impressed by the fact that all these four different types of temperaments that are effectively observed by various people originating from diverse cultures, all was able to effectively describe similar characteristics.

Talking about my temperament results, I am glad to state that I fall under the category of ‘traditionalists’. This is supported by the fact that under various circumstances I always value both ‘sensing’ and ‘judging’. Moreover, I am that kind of an individual who always value various types of law, order and even matters pertaining security (Sloterdijk, 2013). Being orderly has always been my objective in each and every activity that I do.

Secondly my temperament result focuses much in the category of the ‘experiencers’ since for a very long time I have always preferred ‘sensing’ and ‘perceiving’ where I have always been capable of coming up with the appropriate required results which are more effective and reasonable. I am always concerned of remembering and concentrating on those types of issues and activities that can always be felt and seen at the same time documentation of various types of results and outcomes has been among the important parameters that I always keep at my finger tips to ensure adequate outcome under various circumstances. I have always chosen to stay open in most of my activities and due to this I have always found it much easier to work in various types of environments regardless of the type of people found within those environments. Being an experiencer has enabled to focus on the current situation where I am always able to access various issues that can be handled at the present time, throughout my experience, I seldom chose on the various types of activities that are always there to impose a variety of rules under various situations.

Finally, being an ‘idealist’ is one of the most crucial temperamental results that I have been able to possess in an adequate way, this is simply because in most occasions I have been able to prefer both intuition and feeling. Being true to myself has been one of the most important issues that I have been able to carry out leading to a situation of placing a higher value of integrity in various types of individuals.

In terms of personality and work preference, I would like to state categorically that being a traditionalist has been able to portray my personality and work preference most so in the field of industrial engineering where there is the need to be capable of serving adequately and doing the right thing that in the long run will bring a positive outcome. In addition, I have been able to be more practical in terms of solving issues that are related with industrial engineering, systematic analysis of issues has also been on the verge towards producing a quality work when it comes to industrial engineering. Being an ‘experiencer’ as a test results has also been capable of portraying my personality and work preference since I have been able to focus on the issues that can be accomplished currently making me to always try as much as possible to be free and act on my impulses accordingly when it comes to following the stipulated rules and regulations.

There were no surprising results at all, the results that are stated above are adequately in line with my chosen profession when it comes to dealing with issues that are related with industrial engineering. In conclusion, the results were perfectly in line with my core values and what is more important to me is that the best policy in all situations is always honestly and in most occasions effective trust always has to be earned so as to come up with the most appropriate outcome.

REFERENCES

Shindler, J. (2009). Transformative Classroom Management: Positive Strategies to Engage All Students

and Promote a Psychology of Success. Chichester: Wiley.

Sloterdijk, P. (2013). Philosophical temperaments: From Plato to Foucault. New York: Columbia

University Press.