Technology, Care Coordination, and Community Resources Considerations

Thank you for your work on this assessment. I think you did a very nice job assessing a problem from a technology, care coordination, and community resources perspective. It is evident that you understand the impact of these variables on the problem of opioid use. Overall, this is a well-written manuscript. I made some recommendations on your scoring guide on what is needed for a higher performance score. You are approved to submit Assignment 4. I look forward to learning more about your intervention/solution/professional product to address the problem of opioid use.

Dr. J

DOWNLOAD YOUR EVALUATED ASSESSMENT FILE

COMPETENCY 1

Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.

CRITERION

Analyze the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem.

Your result: Proficient

Distinguished

Conducts an astute analysis of the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem. Cites credible and balanced evidence of the advantages and disadvantages of specific technologies. Provides clear insight into current technology use in professional practice, as well as potential barriers and costs.

Proficient

Analyzes the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem.

Basic

Describes the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem.

Non-Performance

Does not describe the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem.

Faculty Comments:

I like that you provided a clear analysis of the impact of technology on a patient, family, or population problem of OUD. For a distinguished score, a more in-depth discussion of how technology might be better used is needed. What does the literature say?

COMPETENCY 2

Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

CRITERION

Analyze state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the CORE ELMS Volunteer Experience Form.

Your result: Proficient

Distinguished

Conducts an astute analysis of state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources. Clearly articulates the implications for ethical professional practice of applying standards and/or policy guidance or legislative requirements to the problem. Documents the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the CORE ELMS Volunteer Experience Form

Proficient

Analyzes state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources and documents the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the CORE ELMS Volunteer Experience Form.

Basic

Attempts to describe state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources, and/or does not document practicum hours in CORE ELMS Volunteer Experience Form.

Non-Performance

Does not describe state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources, and does not document practicum hours in CORE ELMS Volunteer Experience Form.

Faculty Comments:

I liked that you analyzed how your own state�s board of nursing practice standards and/or organization or governmental policies are associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources. For a higher performance score, a more in-depth explanation of the impact of such on the problem of OUD is needed. Documents the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or groups in the Core Elms Volunteer Experience Form.

COMPETENCY 3

Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and population outcomes.

CRITERION

Explain how care coordination and the utilization of community resources can be used to address a patient, family, or population problem.

Your result: Proficient

Distinguished

Provides a convincing explanation of how care coordination and the utilization of community resources can be used to address a patient, family, or population problem. Cites credible and balanced evidence of the benefits of care coordination and the use of community resources. Provides clear insight into current use in professional practice, as well as potential barriers.

Proficient

Explains how care coordination and the utilization of community resources can be used to address a patient, family, or population problem.

Basic

Attempts to describe the value of care coordination and the utilization of community resources in addressing health care challenges.

Non-Performance

Does not describe the value of care coordination and the utilization of community resources in addressing health care challenges.

Faculty Comments:

I liked your explanation of how care coordination and the utilization of community resources can be used to address a patient, family, or population problem of OUD. For a distinguished score, are there authors you could cite, who might provide more citations of supporting evidence or data from the literature to help support this information?

COMPETENCY 4

Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

CRITERION

Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

Your result: Proficient

Distinguished

Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines virtually error-free source citations with a perceptive and coherent synthesis of the evidence.

Proficient

Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

Basic

Sources lack relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations.

Non-Performance

Does not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

Faculty Comments:

I like that you supported main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. For a distinguished score, a discussion of the criteria used to determine the relevance of the supporting evidence is needed.

CRITERION

Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Your result: Distinguished

Distinguished

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to stylistic conventions, document structure, and source attributions.

Proficient

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Basic

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.

Non-Performance

Does not apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Faculty Comments:

I like that your writing was very clear and logical. You have a very professional and engaging writing style. There were no APA errors in format.