|
Criteria
|
Levels of Achievement
|
|
Content
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Developing
|
Not present
|
|
Choice to Technologies
|
28 to 30 points
Student chooses 10 technologies to review (aligned with the 5 categories).
|
25 to 27 points
Student chooses 8 or 9 technologies to review (aligned with the 5 categories).
|
1 to 24 points
Student chooses 6 to 7 technologies to review (aligned with the 5 categories).
|
0 points
Student chooses 5 or fewer technologies to review (aligned with the 5 categories).
|
|
General Functions and Purposes of the Technology
|
23 to 25 points
Student provides a general description of
both
the functions and purposes for each of the 10 chosen technologies.
|
21 to 22 points
Student provides a general description of functions
or
purposes for each of the 10 chosen technologies, but not both.
|
1 to 20 points
Student provides a description that does not fully outline the general functions and purposes of each of the 10 chosen technologies.
|
0 points
Student does not provide a general description of either the functions or purposes of each of the 10 chosen technologies.
|
|
Goals and/or Objectives met by the Technology
(NCSS Standards)
|
23 to 25 points
For each of the 10 reviewed technologies, the student identifies the appropriately associated NCSS standards and
activity examples for pedagogical uses of that technology in a social studies classroom.
|
21 to 22 points
For each of the 10 reviewed technologies, the student either identifies the appropriately associated NCSS standards
or
the activity examples for pedagogical uses of that technology in a social studies classroom, but not both.
|
1 to 20 points
For each of the 10 reviewed technologies, the student does not clearly connect to NCSS standards or activities that support social studies classroom pedagogy.
|
0 points
For each of the 10 reviewed technologies, the student does not effectively identify the appropriately associated NCSS standards or activity examples for pedagogical uses of that technology in a social studies classroom.
|
|
Critique
(Strengths and Weakness of the Technology)
|
23 to 25 points
For each of the 10 reviewed technologies, the student evaluates the likely effectiveness of that technology’s use, looking at
both good and bad elements.
|
21 to 22 points
For each of the 10 reviewed technologies, the student evaluates the likely effectiveness of that technology’s use, looking at either good
or
bad elements.
|
1 to 20 points
For each of the 10 reviewed technologies, the student somewhat evaluates the likely effectiveness of that technology’s use, looking at either good
or
bad elements.
|
0 points
For each of the 10 reviewed technologies, the student does not evaluate the likely effectiveness of that technology’s use, looking at both good and bad elements.
|
|
Structure
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Developing
|
Not present
|
|
Sources
|
14 to 15 points
Citations and references are documented in current APA format with no errors.
|
13 points
Citations and references are documented in current APA format with 1–2 style errors.
|
1 to 12 points
Citations and references are documented in current APA format with 3–4 styles errors.
|
0 points
Citations and or references are missing. More than 4 style errors are present.
|
|
Assignment Completion
|
14 to 15 points
All questions are fully addressed per assignment guidelines in 1–2 paragraphs.
|
13 points
Two of three questions are fully addressed per assignment guidelines in 1–2 paragraphs.
|
1 to 12 points
One of three questions are fully addressed per assignment guidelines in 1–2 paragraphs.
|
0 points
None of questions are fully addressed per assignment guidelines in 1–2 paragraphs.
|
|
Mechanics
|
14 to 15 points
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.
|
13 points
A total of 1–2 grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.
|
1 to 12 points
A total of 3–4 grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.
|
0 points
More than 4 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
|
kk908247
TechnologyPortfolioGradingRubric.docx
0
