Critique

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Below Expectations

Not present

Content Review

33 to 35 Points

Student meets the basic assignment requirements mentioned in the “Proficient” column but does so with exceptional clarity, detail, and insight.

30 to 32 Points

Student provides adequate and accurate review of the teaching strategies, LO’s, etc., observed in the teaching demonstration following the prompts in the assignment instructions. Ideas are well-supported by references to the class sources.

27 to 29 Points

Student captures some of the teaching strategies.

1 to 26 Points

Requirements listed in the “proficient” column are significantly lacking at the doctoral level.

0 points

Not Present

Analysis/Evaluation

46 to 50 Points

Student meets the basic assignment requirements mentioned in the “Proficient” column but does so with exceptional clarity, detail, and insight.

Analysis is superbly demonstrated.

42 to 45 Points

Student provides an adequate analysis/evaluation of the effectiveness of the teaching strategies the instructor used in each demonstration with comments on application of adult learning principles.

Ideas are well-supported by references to the class sources.

38 to 41 Points

Student provides some analysis and evaluation.

1 to 37 Points

Requirements listed in the “proficient” column are significantly lacking at the doctoral level.

0 points

Not Present

Personal Application/Suggested Changes

19 to 20 points

Student meets the basic assignment requirements mentioned in the “Proficient” column but does so with exceptional clarity, detail, and insight.

Student exhibits strong insight in discussion of possible applications.

17 to 18 points

Student discusses personal application to his/her own future teaching. Ideas are well-supported by references to the class sources.

16 points

Student demonstrates some of the requirements listed in the “proficient” column but without appropriate depth at the doctoral level.

1 to 15 points

Requirements listed in the “proficient” column are significantly lacking at the doctoral level.

0 points

Not Present

Structure

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Below Expectations

Not present

Writing, Formatting, and Citation

42 to 45 Points

Student writing is exceptionally clear, persuasive and error free.

Ideas are fully supported and correctly cited using current APA formatting.

38 to 41 Points

Ideas are adequately presented; sentences are correctly constructed, and paragraphs are organized consistently with doctoral level writing.

Writing is largely free of grammar, punctuation, and other writing errors.

Contains any appropriate citations and references cited using current APA formatting.

34 to 37 Points

Student’s writing deviates from the requirements in the “proficient” column in several ways.

1 to 33 Points

Student’s writing deviates from the requirements in the “proficient” column in numerous ways.

0 points

Not Present