Teaching Examples Critique

Criteria Ratings Points

Content Review 35 to >32 pts

Advanced

Student meets the basic assignment requirements mentioned in the “Proficient” column but does so with exceptional clarity, detail, and insight.

32 to >29 pts

Proficient

Student provides adequate and accurate review of the teaching strategies, LO’s, etc., observed in the teaching demonstration following the prompts in the assignment instructions. Ideas are well-supported by references to the class sources.

29 to >26 pts

Developing

Student captures some of the teaching strategies.

26 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Requirements listed in the “proficient” column are significantly lacking at the doctoral level.

0 pts

Not Present

35 pts

Analysis/Evaluation 50 to >45 pts

Advanced

Student meets the basic assignment requirements mentioned in the “Proficient” column but does so with exceptional clarity, detail, and insight. Analysis is superbly demonstrated.

45 to >41 pts

Proficient

Student provides an adequate analysis/evaluation of the effectiveness of the teaching strategies the instructor used in each demonstration with comments on application of adult learning principles. Ideas are well-supported by references to the class sources.

41 to >37 pts

Developing

Student provides some analysis and evaluation.

37 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Requirements listed in the “proficient” column are significantly lacking at the doctoral level.

0 pts

Not Present

50 pts

Teaching Examples Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO725_D02_202530

Criteria Ratings Points

Personal Application/Suggested Changes

20 to >18 pts

Advanced

Student meets the basic assignment requirements mentioned in the “Proficient” column but does so with exceptional clarity, detail, and insight. Student exhibits strong insight in discussion of possible applications.

18 to >16 pts

Proficient

Student discusses personal application to his/her own future teaching. Ideas are well-supported by references to the class sources.

16 to >15 pts

Developing

Student demonstrates some of the requirements listed in the “proficient” column but without appropriate depth at the doctoral level.

15 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Requirements listed in the “proficient” column are significantly lacking at the doctoral level.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Writing, Formatting, and Citation

45 to >41 pts

Advanced

Student writing is exceptionally clear, persuasive and error free. Ideas are fully supported and correctly cited using current APA formatting.

41 to >37 pts

Proficient

Ideas are adequately presented; sentences are correctly constructed, and paragraphs are organized consistently with doctoral level writing. Writing is largely free of grammar, punctuation, and other writing errors. Contains any appropriate citations and references cited using current APA formatting.

37 to >33 pts

Developing

Student’s writing deviates from the requirements in the “proficient” column in several ways.

33 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Student’s writing deviates from the requirements in the “proficient” column in numerous ways.

0 pts

Not Present

45 pts

Total Points: 150

Teaching Examples Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO725_D02_202530