Industrial Revolution
fergamo
task1hrworkshop.docx
Students to listen to the following podcast:
https://employeebenefits.co.uk/podcast-herbert-smith-freehills-ensures-reward-strategypandemic-proof/
and then answer briefly the following two questions, using the knowledge from the podcast, the HR Workshops they attended and other relevant sources or own experience:
· How has the Pandemic and Industrial Revolution 4.0 changes Rewards and Leadership strategies for companies?
· What are the key reward and other HR strategies you would suggest to attract top latent in the post -pandemic era under the light of Industrial Revolution 4.0?
Assignment Guidelines and Criteria
Please use evidence from the case study, as well as evidence from your own research and study.
Credit will be given for evidence of:
· Library/Internet based research. Try to use a mixture of resources - books, articles as well as the internet.
· Evidence/analytical frameworks should be provided in tables on top of the main body analysis.
· Understanding of the issues raised by the questions.
· Concise and clear presentation. Acknowledge any quotes, ideas or arguments that are not your own using the Harvard system.
· Include a list of references.
· Originality and a critical and questioning approach. It is important to be objective and to support statements with evidence.
· A logical structure and well-argued conclusion.
· As well as with per everything else mentioned in the Rubrics.
Word Count: up to 700 words
GRADING CRITERIA
(Grading matrix/rubric next page)
|
|
Exceptional 90-100 |
Good 80-89 |
Fair 70-79 |
Marginal fail 60-69 |
|
Knowledge & Understanding (20%) |
Student demonstrates excellent understanding of the task, the key concepts, applies theory where useful or necessary, and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner. |
Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary. |
Student understands the task and provides minimum conceptual and theoretical support, and uses only some of the relevant vocabulary. |
Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary. |
|
Application (30%) |
Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. |
Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. |
Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident. |
Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding is evident. |
|
Critical Thinking (30%) |
Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing insightful conclusions based on readings from relevant authors. Student also makes clear and correct citations and uses the Harvard referencing method correctly. |
Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references. Student knows how to use the Harvard referencing method correctly. |
Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant. |
Student shows little or no critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources. |
|
Communication (20%) |
Student communicates their ideas very well organized and extremely clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck. |
Student communicates their ideas in an organized manner and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck |
Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the wordcount limit. Some misspelling errors may be evident. |
Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. Does not reach or does exceed wordcount excessively and misspelling errors are evident. |
____________________________________________________________________________
Page | 1
Page | 1
Page | 1
