Current Talent Management Function

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Exceptional/Full Points Very Good Competent Developing

Needs Improvement Missing

Element 1: Introduction

10.5 (15%) Student provides a thorough and detailed introduction sharing relevant details about talent management and the use of SWOT analysis. Introduction is supported by at least one relevant, scholarly source from course articles or updated research and at least one experiential example from current events or own experience.

9.66 (13.8%) Student provides a detailed introduction sharing relevant details about talent management and the use of SWOT analysis. Description is supported by at least one relevant, scholarly source from course articles or updated research and/or at least one experiential example from current events or own experience. Description is comprehensive but missing one or two minor details.

8.93 (12.75%) Student provides an introduction sharing some details about talent management and the use of SWOT analysis. Description is supported with at least one reference from course textbook or other source. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.

7.88 (11.25%) Student provides a cursory or incomplete introduction sharing vague or missing details about talent management and the use of SWOT analysis. Most details are missing and/or introduction is not substantiated with sources or examples.

6.3 (9%) Student demonstrates little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.

0 (0%) Student did not submit this element.

Element 2: Company Selected

10.5 (15%) Student provides a thorough and detailed description of the company selected for SWOT analysis. Description is supported by at least one relevant, scholarly source from course articles or updated research.

9.66 (13.8%) Student provides a detailed description of the company selected for SWOT analysis. Relevant sources or examples support thinking. Description is supported by at least one relevant, scholarly source from course articles or updated research.

8.93 (12.75%) Student provides a description of the company selected for SWOT analysis. Description is supported with at least one reference from course textbook or other source. Some details are missing and/or not fully

7.88 (11.25%) Student provides a cursory or incomplete description with vague or missing details of the company selected for SWOT analysis. Most details are missing and/or description is not substantiated

6.3 (9%) Student demonstrates little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.

0 (0%) Student did not submit this element.

Name: MHRM_6110_Week1_Assignment_Rubric

Grid View List View

Description is comprehensive but missing one or two minor details.

developed. with sources or examples.

Element 3: SWOT Questions (12-15 questions total)

14 (20%) Student provides detailed and relevant questions, 3-5 questions for each area of the SWOT, that align the talent management initiative with the organizational strategy. All questions are appropriate and comprehensively address each area of the SWOT analysis.

12.88 (18.4%) Student provides detailed and relevant questions, 3-5 questions for each area of the SWOT, that align the talent management initiative with the organizational strategy. All questions are appropriate and comprehensively address each area of the SWOT analysis. There are one or two minor errors.

11.9 (17%) Student provides at least three questions for each area of the SWOT that align the talent management initiative with the organizational strategy. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.

10.5 (15%) Student provides at least three questions for each area of the SWOT that somewhat align the talent management initiative with the organizational strategy. Some questions are not appropriate and/or relevant for the SWOT analysis.

8.4 (12%) Student demonstrates little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.

0 (0%) Student does not submit this element.

Element 4: Conclusion

10.5 (15%) Student provides a thorough and detailed conclusion highlighting 2-3 key points made in the paper. Conclusion is supported by at least one relevant, scholarly source from course articles or updated research and at least one experiential example from current events or own experience.

9.66 (13.8%) Student provides a detailed conclusion highlighting 2-3 key points made in the paper. Conclusion is supported by at least one relevant, scholarly source from course articles or updated research and/or at least one experiential example from current events or own experience. Conclusion is comprehensive but missing one or two minor details.

8.93 (12.75%) Student provides a conclusion on 2-3 key points made in the paper. Conclusion is supported with at least one reference from course textbook or other source and/or at least one experiential example from current events or own experience. Some details are missing and/or

7.88 (11.25%) Student provides a cursory conclusion with vague or missing details on 2-3 key points made in the paper. Most details are missing and/or conclusion is not substantiated with sources or examples.

6.3 (9%) Student demonstrates little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.

0 (0%) Student does not submit this element.

Element 5: Critical Thinking

10.5 (15%) Student exhibited comprehensive critical analysis and thinking throughout the paper, consistently supporting their

9.66 (13.8%) Student exhibited comprehensive critical analysis and thinking throughout the paper. Consistent logical

8.93 (12.75%) Student exhibited some critical analysis and thinking overall on the assignment,

7.88 (11.25%) Student exhibited inconsistent critical analysis and thinking on the

6.3 (9%) Student demonstrates little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.

0 (0%) Student did not submit this element.

thinking with relevant resources and examples. Strong logical progression of ideas with detailed supporting rationales throughout the paper.

progression of ideas with detailed rationales supports thinking.

but analysis would have been stronger with more recent or additional resources or examples. Consistent logical progression of ideas with rationales supports thinking.

assignment due to the logic and/or reasoning being difficult to understand or follow. Rationales are missing or not well supported.

Element 6: Organization and Writing/Form/Style

14 (20%) Student demonstrates thorough organization and writing skills by consistently applying APA format and style. Writing is well- organized and grammatically correct including complete sentences that are free of spelling errors. A reference list with a variety of scholarly resources is provided, using APA formatting, and it matches the citations cited within the text.

13.3 (19%) Student demonstrates thorough organization and writing skills by consistently applying APA format and style. Writing is well- organized and grammatically correct including complete sentences that are free of spelling errors. A reference list with a variety of scholarly sources is provided, using APA formatting, and it matches the citations cited within the text, but with one or two minor errors.

11.9 (17%) Student demonstrates organization and writing skills by mostly applying APA format and style. Writing is well- organized and mostly grammatically correct including complete sentences that are mostly free of spelling errors. While a reference list is provided and includes a variety of resources, APA formatting may be incorrect or the list may not have matched the citations cited within the text.

10.5 (15%) Student made a cursory attempt to address but there are numerous errors, writing is difficult to read, and/or no reference list is provided.

9.1 (13%) Student submission does not adhere to the writing expectations.

0 (0%) Student did not submit this assignment.

Name: MHRM_6110_Week1_Assignment_Rubric

EXIT