Paper 2
ANOVA
Part II: Abigail's behavior was wrong
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between Groups
9.434
2
4.717
5.811
.004
Within Groups
107.970
133
.812
Total
117.404
135
Descriptives
Part II: Abigail's behavior was wrong
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum
Maximum
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Support
46
3.3261
.73195
.10792
3.1087
3.5434
2.00
6.00
Oppose
41
3.9512
.94740
.14796
3.6522
4.2503
1.00
6.00
Mixed
49
3.7959
.99957
.14280
3.5088
4.0830
2.00
6.00
Total
136
3.6838
.93256
.07997
3.5257
3.8420
1.00
6.00
Post Hoc Tests
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Part II: Abigail's behavior was wrong
Tukey HSD
(I) Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
(J) Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
Mean Difference (I-J)
Std. Error
Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Support
Oppose
-.62513*
.19352
.004
-1.0838
-.1665
Mixed
-.46983*
.18497
.033
-.9083
-.0314
Oppose
Support
.62513*
.19352
.004
.1665
1.0838
Mixed
.15530
.19070
.695
-.2967
.6073
Mixed
Support
.46983*
.18497
.033
.0314
.9083
Oppose
-.15530
.19070
.695
-.6073
.2967
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
Part II: Abigail's behavior was wrong
Tukey HSDa,b
Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
2
Support
46
3.3261
Mixed
49
3.7959
Oppose
41
3.9512
Sig.
1.000
.692
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 45.087.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.
ONEWAY PartIIIKeepSilentAbigail BY IVCondition
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC=TUKEY ALPHA(0.05).
Frequencies
Statistics
Race
N
Valid
140
Missing
0
Race
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
Caucasian
36
25.7
25.7
25.7
Hispanic
56
40.0
40.0
65.7
Native Indian
3
2.1
2.1
67.9
African American
24
17.1
17.1
85.0
Asian American
9
6.4
6.4
91.4
Other
12
8.6
8.6
100.0
Total
140
100.0
100.0
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=PartIVGender
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Frequencies
Statistics
Gender (1 = M, 2 = F)
N
Valid
135
Missing
5
Gender (1 = M, 2 = F)
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
Male
62
44.3
45.9
45.9
Female
73
52.1
54.1
100.0
Total
135
96.4
100.0
Missing
System
5
3.6
Total
140
100.0
DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=IVCondition
/STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX
Descriptive Statistics
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
140
1.00
3.00
2.0214
.82643
Valid N (listwise)
140
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Missing
Total
N
Percent
N
Percent
N
Percent
Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed) * Attention Check (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
136
97.1%
4
2.9%
140
100.0%
Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed) * Attention Check (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed) Crosstabulation
Attention Check (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
Total
Feedback supported her behavior
Feedback opposed her behavior
Feedback was mixed
Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
Support
Count
37
1
7
45
% within Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
82.2%
2.2%
15.6%
100.0%
Oppose
Count
1
35
7
43
% within Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
2.3%
81.4%
16.3%
100.0%
Mixed
Count
5
4
39
48
% within Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
10.4%
8.3%
81.3%
100.0%
Total
Count
43
40
53
136
% within Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
31.6%
29.4%
39.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
147.039a
4
.000
Likelihood Ratio
142.630
4
.000
Linear-by-Linear Association
62.028
1
.000
N of Valid Cases
136
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.65.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Approximate Significance
Nominal by Nominal
Phi
1.040
.000
Cramer's V
.735
.000
N of Valid Cases
136
T-TEST GROUPS=IVCondition(1 2)
/MISSING=ANALYSIS
/VARIABLES=PartIIISameAdvice
/CRITERIA=CI(.95).
T-Test
Group Statistics
Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
Part III: I would give Abigail the same advice that her friends gave her
Support
46
4.3478
.70608
.10411
Oppose
45
4.4000
.78044
.11634
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for Equality of Variances
t-test for Equality of Means
F
Sig.
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Part III: I would give Abigail the same advice that her friends gave her
Equal variances assumed
.759
.386
-.335
89
.739
Equal variances not assumed
-.334
87.697
.739