tables.doc1.doc

ANOVA

Part II: Abigail's behavior was wrong

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Between Groups

9.434

2

4.717

5.811

.004

Within Groups

107.970

133

.812

Total

117.404

135

Descriptives

Part II: Abigail's behavior was wrong

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Minimum

Maximum

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Support

46

3.3261

.73195

.10792

3.1087

3.5434

2.00

6.00

Oppose

41

3.9512

.94740

.14796

3.6522

4.2503

1.00

6.00

Mixed

49

3.7959

.99957

.14280

3.5088

4.0830

2.00

6.00

Total

136

3.6838

.93256

.07997

3.5257

3.8420

1.00

6.00

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons

Dependent Variable: Part II: Abigail's behavior was wrong

Tukey HSD

(I) Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

(J) Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

Mean Difference (I-J)

Std. Error

Sig.

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Support

Oppose

-.62513*

.19352

.004

-1.0838

-.1665

Mixed

-.46983*

.18497

.033

-.9083

-.0314

Oppose

Support

.62513*

.19352

.004

.1665

1.0838

Mixed

.15530

.19070

.695

-.2967

.6073

Mixed

Support

.46983*

.18497

.033

.0314

.9083

Oppose

-.15530

.19070

.695

-.6073

.2967

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Homogeneous Subsets

Part II: Abigail's behavior was wrong

Tukey HSDa,b

Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

N

Subset for alpha = 0.05

1

2

Support

46

3.3261

Mixed

49

3.7959

Oppose

41

3.9512

Sig.

1.000

.692

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 45.087.

b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.

ONEWAY PartIIIKeepSilentAbigail BY IVCondition

/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES

/MISSING ANALYSIS

/POSTHOC=TUKEY ALPHA(0.05).

Frequencies

Statistics

Race

N

Valid

140

Missing

0

Race

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Caucasian

36

25.7

25.7

25.7

Hispanic

56

40.0

40.0

65.7

Native Indian

3

2.1

2.1

67.9

African American

24

17.1

17.1

85.0

Asian American

9

6.4

6.4

91.4

Other

12

8.6

8.6

100.0

Total

140

100.0

100.0

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=PartIVGender

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

Statistics

Gender (1 = M, 2 = F)

N

Valid

135

Missing

5

Gender (1 = M, 2 = F)

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Male

62

44.3

45.9

45.9

Female

73

52.1

54.1

100.0

Total

135

96.4

100.0

Missing

System

5

3.6

Total

140

100.0

DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=IVCondition

/STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX

Descriptive Statistics

N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

140

1.00

3.00

2.0214

.82643

Valid N (listwise)

140

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid

Missing

Total

N

Percent

N

Percent

N

Percent

Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed) * Attention Check (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

136

97.1%

4

2.9%

140

100.0%

Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed) * Attention Check (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed) Crosstabulation

Attention Check (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

Total

Feedback supported her behavior

Feedback opposed her behavior

Feedback was mixed

Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

Support

Count

37

1

7

45

% within Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

82.2%

2.2%

15.6%

100.0%

Oppose

Count

1

35

7

43

% within Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

2.3%

81.4%

16.3%

100.0%

Mixed

Count

5

4

39

48

% within Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

10.4%

8.3%

81.3%

100.0%

Total

Count

43

40

53

136

% within Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

31.6%

29.4%

39.0%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

147.039a

4

.000

Likelihood Ratio

142.630

4

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

62.028

1

.000

N of Valid Cases

136

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.65.

Symmetric Measures

Value

Approximate Significance

Nominal by Nominal

Phi

1.040

.000

Cramer's V

.735

.000

N of Valid Cases

136

T-TEST GROUPS=IVCondition(1 2)

/MISSING=ANALYSIS

/VARIABLES=PartIIISameAdvice

/CRITERIA=CI(.95).

T-Test

Group Statistics

Condition (1 = Support, 2 = Oppose, 3 = Mixed)

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Part III: I would give Abigail the same advice that her friends gave her

Support

46

4.3478

.70608

.10411

Oppose

45

4.4000

.78044

.11634

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F

Sig.

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Part III: I would give Abigail the same advice that her friends gave her

Equal variances assumed

.759

.386

-.335

89

.739

Equal variances not assumed

-.334

87.697

.739