brand report

profilezyyyy
T10_BM_SPR19.pdf

ANALYSING DATA & PRESENTING

RESULTS

2

Brand Management 24752

Data coding • This is the process of grouping and assigning

value to the responses from the survey instrument.

• Incorporate coding into questionnaire design where possible

• Assign a coded value to each response • Use numeric codes • Assign codes to missing data • Open-ended questions need to be coded for data

entry

Presenter
Presentation Notes
A good practice is to assign higher-value codes to positive responses than to negative responses. For example, coding ‘no’ responses as 0 and ‘yes’ responses as 1; coding ‘disagree’ responses as 1 and ‘agree’ responses as 5. Coding of this nature makes subsequent analysis easier. The researcher will find it easier to interpret means or averages if higher values occur as the average moves from ‘disagree’ to ‘agree’.

3

Brand Management 24752

Data coding continued

4

Brand Management 24752

Data coding continued

• Coding open-ended questions • Open-ended questions provide greater insight into the

topic than forced-choice questions or rating scales • Open-ended questions do not allow for an exact list of

potential responses

• Developing codes for open-ended questions • Generate a list of as many potential responses as possible • Consolidation of responses into categories • Assign values to data which has been captured by the survey

instrument • Assign a numerical value as a code to each of the consolidated

categories

Presenter
Presentation Notes
# For coding open-ended questions These types of questions, when properly answered, can provide greater insight into the research project than forced-choice questions or rating scales. A major part of coding the answers to open-ended questions is interpretation. Exhibit 13.6 shows some typical responses and thus points to problems associated with interpreting open-ended questions.

5

Brand Management 24752

Data description • The process of describing the data sample so that general patterns

of responses and respondent profiles are revealed

• Why is it required • Almost all data sets are disaggregated (just rows and columns) • Every set of data needs some summary information developed that

describes the numbers it contains

• Statistical techniques used • Data tabulation (frequency distribution, cross-tabulations, etc.) • Measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) • Measures of dispersion (range, standard deviation)

6

Brand Management 24752

Data tabulation continued

• The process of counting the number of observations and cases that analysts classify into certain categories

• The purpose of tabulations range from further validation of the accuracy of the data to the communication of results

• Two common forms of tabulation are: • one-way tabulation • cross-tabulation

7

Brand Management 24752

One-way tabulation • When a research team performs a ‘one-way’ tabulation they

focus on a single variable operating in the research study • Research analysts use one-way tabulations to:

• determine the degree of non-response to individual questions • locate simple blunders in data entry • calculate summary statistics on various questions, for example

averages, standard deviations and percentages • communicate the results of the research project

• Profile sample respondents • Distinguishing characteristics between groups • Establishing percentage of respondents who respond differently to

different situations

• Frequency table is constructed to illustrate one-way tabulations

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Distinguishing characteristics between groups (e.g. heavy vs versus light users) establishes the percentage of respondents who respond differently to different situations (e.g. the percentage of people who purchase fast food from drive-through windows, and those who use dine-in facilities).

8

Brand Management 24752

One-way tabulation continued • One-way tabulation can be illustrated through

constructing a one-way frequency table

9

Brand Management 24752

One-way tabulation continued

One-way frequency tables provide: • indications of missing data

• one-way frequency tables indicate the absolute number of missing responses for each question

• valid percentages • the establishment of valid percentages is based on

removing incomplete surveys or particular questions • summary statistics

• One-way frequency tables can illustrate a variety of summary statistics relevant to the question being analysed

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Review Table 13.1 for example

10

Brand Management 24752

Cross-tabulation • This simultaneously treats two or more variables in the

study by categorising the number of respondents who have responded to two or more consecutive questions

• Helps to analyse relationships among and between variables

• To quickly compare how different groups of respondents answer survey questions

• Provide a valid description of both aggregate and subgroup data

• Merging of frequency distributions of two or more variables

11

Brand Management 24752

Cross-tabulation continued

• Two key elements of cross-tabulation are: • how to develop the cross-tabulation • how to interpret the outcome

• It is widely used • Normally the main form of data analysis in most

marketing research projects • Easily understood and interpreted by managers • Simple to conduct and appealing to less

sophisticated managers

Presenter
Presentation Notes
What types of questions can cross tabs answer For customer satisfaction surveys, find out: How do satisfaction levels differ between repeat and first-time buyers? What is the relationship between how satisfied customers are and whether they would recommend our product or service? For employee surveys, find out: How do employees in specific departments feel about our company? Is there a relationship between office location and satisfaction? Does that relationship still exist when we control for length of employment?

12

Brand Management 24752

Cross-tabulation continued

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Example discussion for students

13

Brand Management 24752

Cross-tabulation continued • Challenges

• The analyst should take care to construct cross- tabulations that accurately reflect information relevant to the objectives of the project

• Certain survey approaches can lend themselves to the construction of an endless variety of cross-tabulation tables

• More than three variables can be cross-tabulated but interpretation complex

• Cross-tabulations are not efficient when examining relationships among several variables

• Cross-tabulations can interpret associations not causation

14

Brand Management 24752

Measures of central tendency • Mean

• The arithmetic average of the sample • Survey data should display some central tendency with

most of the responses distributed around the mean

• Mode • The most common value in the set of responses to a

question; that is, the response most often given to a question.

• The value (item) that occurs most frequently • For nominal data, researchers generally use the mode.

15

Brand Management 24752

Measures of central tendency continued

• Median • Middle value in the data set when the data are arranged in ascending

or descending order

16

Brand Management 24752

Example – mean brand performance on attributes (Contd.)

Ratings ( out of 5 points)

Convenience (Brand A)

Convenience (Brand B)

R1 2 1 R2 3 5 R3 3 2 R4 2 1 R5 5 4 R6 4 3 R7 1 2 R8 2 4 R9 2 3 Average Rating 2.67 2.78

17

Brand Management 24752

Example – mean brand performance on attributes (Contd.)

Average Ratings Brand A Brand B

Convenience 2.67 2.78 Quality 3.45 3.21 Affordability 2.10 3.67 Service 2.92 2.27 Staff 3.33 2.94 Variety 4.12 3.78 Cleanliness 3.65 3.23

18

Brand Management 24752

Example – mean brand performance on attributes

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Convenience Quality Affordability Service Staff Variety Cleanliness

Brand A Brand B

19

Brand Management 24752

Results • Focuses on data analysis and findings

• The challenge for researchers is to summarise and present the analysis in a way that makes it easy to understand for non-specialists.

• Key contents – Results corresponding to each aspect of brand

equity – Corresponding charts and tables with comments

20

Brand Management 24752

Results continued

• Best practice suggests that tables, figures and graphs be used when results are presented.

• Graphs and tables should provide a simple summary of the data in a clear, concise and nontechnical manner.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
No matter how complicated the statistical analysis, the challenge for researchers is to summarise and present the analysis in a way that makes it easy to understand for non-specialists. This portion of the report is not simply an undifferentiated dump of the findings. When reporting results, no writer should claim the results are ‘obvious’, or ‘self-evident’. Rather, report writers both present and interpret their results. The researcher must decide how to group the findings into sections that facilitate understanding.

21

Brand Management 24752

Results – sample display • Sample display of bar charts

22

Brand Management 24752

Conclusions • Descriptive statements which generalise and summarise the

results

23

Brand Management 24752

Recommendations • Generated by critical thinking • Must address how the client can solve the problem at hand • Researcher must critically evaluate each conclusion and develop

specific areas of applications for strategic or tactical actions

24

Brand Management 24752

Appendixes

• An appendix can include details which are not possible to insert in the main report

• Most appendixes should be treated as points of reference in the report.

• Key contents • Complex or detailed information (e.g. ads) • Questionnaire • Detailed statistical analysis and tables

25

Brand Management 24752

Common problems encountered

• Some of the more common problems encountered when preparing a report are:

• lack of data interpretation • unnecessary use of statistics • too much emphasis on packaging/the look of the

report. • lack of relevance • too much emphasis on a few statistics.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Lack of data interpretation. In some instances, researchers get so involved in constructing tables of results that they fail to provide proper written interpretation of the data within the tables. It is the responsibility of the researcher to describe what the data in tables mean. Unnecessary use of statistics. In order to impress the client, many researchers will unnecessarily subject data to sophisticated statistical techniques. Researchers should avoid this practice. In a large number of commercial research projects, the most sophisticated statistical technique that a study requires will be a Chi-square test. Too much emphasis on packaging. With the abundance of computer software packages available today, many researchers go out of their way to make the report look classy or flamboyant with sophisticated computer-generated graphics. While graphic representation of the results is essential in the report, researchers should not lose sight of the primary research purpose—to provide valid and credible information to the client; they should not sacrifice research quality, especially clarity, for research packaging. Lack of relevance. Reporting data, statistics and information that are not consistent with the study’s objectives is a major problem with writing the report. Researchers should develop their report with the research questions and objectives clearly in focus. They should avoid adding unnecessary information just to make the report bigger. They should remain in the realm of practicality and suggest ideas that are relevant, doable and consistent with the results of the study. (For a further discussion about the issue of relevance of results and information, see ‘A closer look—The future: information goes interactive?’ overleaf.) Too much emphasis on a few statistics. Researchers should avoid basing all conclusions or recommendations on one or a few statistically significant results. They ought to find a variety of supporting evidence for any conclusion or recommendation.
  • ANALYSING DATA & PRESENTING RESULTS
  • Data coding
  • Data coding continued
  • Data coding continued
  • Data description
  • Data tabulation continued
  • One-way tabulation
  • One-way tabulation continued
  • One-way tabulation continued
  • Cross-tabulation
  • Cross-tabulation continued
  • Cross-tabulation continued
  • Cross-tabulation continued
  • Measures of central tendency
  • Measures of central tendency continued
  • Example – mean brand performance on attributes (Contd.)
  • Example – mean brand performance on attributes (Contd.)
  • Example – mean brand performance on attributes
  • Results
  • Results continued
  • Results – sample display
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations
  • Appendixes
  • Common problems encountered