Financial accounting (Reflection Writing )

Rubric Group Assignment – Parts A and C

MAA261- T1 2018

Criteria Poor Needs Improvement

Acceptable Good Very Good Excellent

Criterion, Teamwork (GLO 7), Attitude and application of

teamwork skills and knowledge (Total 10 marks)

0-2.4 marks Consistently demonstrates a negative attitude towards teamwork or the work assigned.

2.5-4.9 marks Demonstrates a developing positive attitude towards teamwork and the assigned work.

5-5.9 marks Demonstrates a rudimentary attitude towards teamwork and the work being assigned with some autonomy about responsibility and accountability.

6-6.9 marks Demonstrates a purposeful attitude towards teamwork and a clear capacity to think critically about their own responsibility and accountability to the team.

7-7.9 marks Demonstrates an engaged attitude towards teamwork and a sophisticated capacity to think critically about their own responsibility and accountability to the team.

8-10 marks Demonstrates a mature and professional attitude towards teamwork and a detailed and thoughtful capacity to think critically about their own responsibility and accountability to the team.

Criterion, Teamwork (GLO 7), Work processes (Total 10 marks)

0-2.4 marks Makes no reference or analysis of the team’s work processes for problem solving, communication and decision making.

2.5-4.9 marks Makes little reference and analysis of the team’s work processes for problem solving, communication and decision making.

5-5.9 marks Makes acceptable reference and analysis of the team’s work processes for problem solving, communication and decision making.

6-6.9 marks Makes good reference and analysis of the team’s work processes for problem solving, communication and decision making, demonstrating an awareness of issues that arose.

7-7.9 marks Makes very good reference and analysis of the team’s work processes for problem solving, communication and decision making, demonstrating an awareness of issues that arose and how they could have been avoided or resolved.

8-10 marks Makes excellent reference and analysis of the team’s work processes for problem solving, communication and decision making demonstrating an awareness of issues that arose and how they could have been avoided or resolved and describes how they will implement this in the future.

Criterion, Self-Evaluation (GLO 6), Independent Intellectual

Connection (Total 10 marks)

0-2.4 marks Makes no reference to previous learning; does not apply knowledge and skills to demonstrate comprehension and performance in novel situations.

2.5-4.9 marks Makes vague or little references to previous learning; has difficulty independently applying knowledge and skills to demonstrate comprehension and performance in familiar and novel situations.

5-5.9 marks Makes basic references to previous learning and shows evidence of independently applying that knowledge and skills to demonstrate comprehension and performance in familiar and novel situations.

6-6.9 marks Makes clearly relevant references to previous learning and shows evidence of independently and creatively applying that knowledge and skills to demonstrate comprehension and performance in familiar and novel situations.

7-7.9 marks Makes explicit references to previous learning and makes novel connections, leading to some generation of new knowledge, demonstrating a high level of comprehension and performance in familiar and novel situations.

8-10 marks Makes detailed, accurate and thoughtfully explicit references to previous learning and makes novel connections, leading to generation of new knowledge, demonstrating an advanced level of comprehension and performance in familiar and novel situations.

Criterion, Self-Evaluation, (GLO 6), SMART goals

(Total 10 marks)

0-2.4 marks The reflection does not exhibit any particularly original or important

2.5-4.9 marks The reflection rarely exhibits any particularly original or important

5-5.9 marks The reflection exhibits some original and/or important insight of

6-6.9 marks The reflection exhibits a good level of originality and important insight of

7-7.9 marks The reflection exhibits a very good level of originality and important

8-10 marks The reflection exhibits an excellent level of originality and important

insight of relevance to the goals developed.

insight of relevance to the goals developed.

relevance to the goals developed.

relevance to the goals developed.

insight of relevance to the goals developed.

insight of relevance to the goals developed.

Overall Score / 40 Marks

Converted to: /10 Marks

N N P C D HD

0 or more 10 or more 20 or more 24 or more 28 or more 32 or more