Systems Dynamics Ap

7/6/2019 Systems Dynamics Application Case Study Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/DB/DB8321/190700/Scoring_Guides/u01a1_scoring_guide.html 1/2

Systems Dynamics Application Case Study Scoring Guide

Due Date: End of Unit 1 Percentage of Course Grade: 10%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Apply systems theory, including systems dynamics, to the operation of a real-world supply chain management case study. 22%

Does not use systems theory and systems dynamics concepts to understand the operation of a real- world supply chain management case study.

Uses some systems theory and systems dynamics concepts to understand the operation of a real- world supply chain management case study, but does not fully or effectively apply the concepts.

Applies systems theory, including systems dynamics, to the operation of a real world supply chain management case study.

Applies systems theory, including systems dynamics, to the operation of a real world supply chain management case study, showing significant insights into the interrelationships within the system.

Evaluate the effectiveness of an organization's use of supply chain techniques, including process management, inventory management, capacity planning, and constraint management. 22%

Does not describe an organization's use of supply chain techniques.

Describes an organization's use of supply chain techniques, including process management, inventory management, capacity planning, and constraint management, but does not evaluate the effectiveness of their use.

Evaluates the effectiveness of an organization's use of supply chain techniques, including process management, inventory management, capacity planning, and constraint management.

Evaluates the effectiveness of an organization's use of supply chain techniques, including process management, inventory management, capacity planning, and constraint management, clearly demonstrating the inter- relationships between techniques.

Evaluate a supply chain’s overall performance and business impact. 22%

Does not describe a supply chain’s overall performance and business impact.

Describes, but does not evaluate a supply chain’s overall performance and business impact.

Evaluates a supply chain’s overall performance and business impact.

Evaluates a supply chain’s overall performance and business impact at both operational and strategic levels.

Identify supply chain processes that would most benefit from statistical analysis to improve supply chain performance. 22%

Does not identify any supply chain processes that would benefit from statistical analysis to improve supply chain performance.

Identifies some supply chain processes that would benefit from statistical analysis to improve supply chain performance, but fails to identify one or more that would most benefit.

Identifies supply chain processes that would most benefit from statistical analysis to improve supply chain performance.

Identifies supply chain processes that would most benefit from statistical analysis and specific statistical methods to improve supply chain performance. Details how statistical analysis can be applied and the results evaluated to achieve gains.

7/6/2019 Systems Dynamics Application Case Study Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/DB/DB8321/190700/Scoring_Guides/u01a1_scoring_guide.html 2/2

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions. 12%

Does not write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate format; does not adhere to APA style for citing and referencing nor uses grammar, punctuation, and mechanics as expected for members of the business professions.

Generally communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions; minor errors in grammar, mechanics, or APA style occasionally detract from the strength of the writing.

Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions.

Communicates in an exceptionally clear, grammatically correct, and persuasive manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions. Consistently adheres to APA style for citing and referencing.