urgent 1

Criteria Ratings Points

Introduction and conclusion

20 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

The introduction is succinct and embodies the project’s primary objectives and outcomes. The introduction constructs the purpose of the system. A compelling and justifiable conclusion is developed that supports the key outcomes. More than 5 scholarly sources and 500 words combined.

17 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

The introduction and conclusion are succinct and embody most of the project’s primary objectives and outcomes, and/or the introduction constructs an unclear purpose of the system. Justified conclusion developed. Minimum of 5 scholarly sources and 500 words.

16 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The introduction and/or conclusion are generalized and embody some of the project’s primary objectives and outcomes and/or has less than the minimum of 5 scholarly sources and 500 words and/or is not defensible.

0 pts

Not Present

Substantially unmet or not present

20 pts

Problem statement

20 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

Problem statement is feasible and addresses the key deliverables of the project including a highly innovative, available, scalable, and secure information systems solution that can be implemented in the cloud or a distributed environment. Over 500 words and 5 unique and relevant scholarly journal articles that justify the problem and need for a solution.

17 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

Problem statement is mostly feasible and addresses the key deliverables of the project including a highly innovative, available, scalable, and secure information systems solution that can be implemented in the cloud or a distributed environment and is at least 500 words with 5 unique and relevant scholarly journal articles that justify the problem and need for a solution.

16 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Problem statement is partially feasible and/or does not address the key deliverables of the project including a highly innovative, available, scalable, and secure information systems solution that can be implemented in the cloud or a distributed environment and/or is not at least 500 words with 5 unique and relevant scholarly journal articles that justify the problem and need for a solution.

0 pts

Not Present

Substantially unmet or not present

20 pts

Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 1 Grading Rubric | BMIS530_D01_202230

Criteria Ratings Points

Feasibility study and project plan

100 to >91.0 pts

Advanced

Feasibility study and project plan are more detailed and higher quality than the textbook examples in each of the core objectives including at a minimum the SDLC cycle, updating the old information system to the new cloud-based system, a comprehensive / detailed project charter, scope, alternatives, schedule, tasks, resource estimations, work break down structure, financial budget, cost, and benefit analysis. Plan is over 2,000 words with over 10 relevant supporting scholarly sources justifying the methods, standards, estimations, and costs.

91 to >83.0 pts

Proficient

Feasibility study and project plan are as detailed as the textbook examples in each of the core objectives including at a minimum the SDLC cycle, updating the old information system to the new cloud-based system, a comprehensive / detailed project charter, scope, alternatives, schedule, tasks, resource estimations, work break down structure, financial budget, cost, and benefit analysis and/or plan is at least 2,000 words with a minimum of 10 relevant supporting scholarly sources justifying the methods, standards, estimations, and costs.

83 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Feasibility study and project plan components are not each as detailed as the textbook examples in the core objectives including at a minimum the SDLC cycle, updating the old information system to the new cloud-based system, a comprehensive / detailed project charter, scope, alternatives, schedule, tasks, resource estimations, work break down structure, financial budget, cost, and benefit analysis and/or plan is less than 2,000 words and/or has less than 10 relevant supporting scholarly sources justifying the methods, standards, estimations, and costs.

0 pts

Not Present

Substantially unmet or not present

100 pts

Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 1 Grading Rubric | BMIS530_D01_202230

Criteria Ratings Points

APA, Grammar, and Spelling

20 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

Properly formatted APA paper with table of contents and references pages. Correct spelling and grammar used. Contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format. Excellent organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist.

17 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

Paper contains fewer than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or some errors (3-7) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist and/or notable absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size (Times New Roman 12 point), and line spacing.

16 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Paper contains fewer than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or numerous errors (7+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist and/or notable absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size (Times New Roman 12 point), and line spacing.

0 pts

Not Present

Paper contains more than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or numerous errors (10+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist.

20 pts

Overall Requirements

40 to >36.0 pts

Advanced

Over 2,000 words exist of original student authorship that shows excellent mastery and knowledge of systems analysis and design. Over 10 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals exist that directly relate to and sufficiently support an operational systems analysis and design.

36 to >33.0 pts

Proficient

Minimum of 2,000 words exist of original student authorship that shows mastery and knowledge of systems analysis and design. 10 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals exist that relate to and sufficiently support an operational systems analysis and design.

33 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Less than 2,000 words of original student authorship that shows mastery and knowledge of systems analysis and design and/or there are less than 10 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals that relate to and sufficiently support an operational systems analysis and design.

0 pts

Not Present

Substantially unmet or not present

40 pts

Total Points: 200

Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 1 Grading Rubric | BMIS530_D01_202230