research

SYSTEMATICTABLE1.docx


ARTICLE	Brooke et al (2018)	Chant & Westendorf (2019)	Eckerson (2018)	Morphet, et al (2016)	Rush, et al (2017)	Van Camp & Chappy (2016)
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE	LEVEL V	LEVEL V	LEVEL V	LEVEL V	LEVEL V	LEVEL V
ARE STUDIES CONTAINED IN REVIEW RCTS?	NONE	NONE		NONE	NONE	NONE
DOES REVIEW CONTAIN DETAILED SEARCH STRATEGY DESCRIPTION?	YES	YES		YES	YES	YES
DOES REVIEW DESCRIBE HOW VALIDITY OF INDIVIDUAL STUDIES WAS ASSESSED?	YES	NO		YES	YES	YES
ARE RESULTS CONSISTENT ACROSS STUDIES?	YES	NO		YES	YES	YES
IS INDIVIDUAL HOSPITAL OR AGGREGATE DATA USED?	AGGREGATE	AGGREGATE		INDIVIDUAL AND AGGREGATE	INDIVIDUAL AND AGGREGATE	INDIVIDUAL AND AGGREGATE
HOW LARGE IS THE RESIDENCY/TPP EFFECT (% OF RETENTION)?	86% AVERAGE	NO SPECIFIC RETENTION DATA PROVIDED: RECOMMENDATION BY INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE IS NRPS TO SUPPORT EVERY NEW NURSE IN TRANSITION TO PRACTICE		18 Emergency departments and 13 surveys. No advantages for longer programs	88% AVERAGE	VARIABLE- 78-90% RETENTION AFTER ONE YEAR - MOSTLY MEASURED IN POST-IMPLEMENTATION RETENTION
ARE THE STUDIED HOSPITALS AND NURSES SIMILAR TO AREA HOSPITALS AND NURSES?	YES	YES		YES	YES	YES
IS IT FEASIBLE TO IMPLEMENT TPP/RESIDENCY PROGRAMS IN AREA HOSPITALS?	YES	YES		YES	YES	YES
WERE COSTS/BENEFITS CONSIDERED?	YES	YES		YES	YES	YES
ARE THERE CIRCUMSTANCES PREVENTING IMPLEMENTATION OF TPP/RESIDENCY PROGRAMS?	UNLIKELY	UNLIKELY		UNLIKELY	UNLIKELY	UNLIKELY
DO NEW GRADUATE NURSES PREFER TPP/NURSE RESIDENCY PROGRAMS OVER TRADITIONAL ORIENTATIONS?	YES	UNCERTAIN		YES	YES	YES