System Designs Project
System Design project Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Quality of Diagrams/ Processes: Key Components |
27 to 30 points* Information clearly relates to the main topic and includes several supporting details and/or examples within the systems analysis and design processes and diagrams. |
21 to 26 points* Information clearly relates to the main topic, but no details and/or examples are given within the systems analysis and design processes and diagrams. |
1 to 20 points* Information has little relation to the main topic within the systems analysis and design processes and diagrams. |
0 points Information has no relation to the main topic within the systems analysis and design processes and diagrams. |
|
Accuracy of Analysis: Major Design Support |
27 to 30 points* Major points are supported by all of the following:
· All analysis and designs are thoroughly addressed and/or all questions are answered along with diagrams.
· A minimum of five (5) unique UML system analysis models/diagrams exist that accurately analyze the system given the business problem and requirements gathering results.
|
21 to 26 points* Major points are supported by all of the following:
· Analysis and design are generally addressed and all questions were answered along with diagrams.
· A minimum of five (5) unique UML system analysis models/diagrams exist that semi-accurately analyze the system given the business problem and requirements gathering results. |
1 to 20 points* Major points are supported by all of the following:
· Analysis, design, and/or questions were not addressed satisfactorily.
· Less than five (5) unique UML system analysis models/diagrams exist and/or five or more diagrams exist that do not accurately analyze the system given the business problem and requirements gathering results.
|
0 points Major points were supported.
Analysis, design, and/or questions were not addressed. |
|
Accuracy of Design: Major Design Support |
27 to 30 points* Major points are supported by all of the following:
The systems design is sufficiently supported with scholarly research, includes a minimum of two (2) graphical user interfaces (or alternatively justified) that accurately follow UI design standards, and properly identifies needed infrastructure to support the new information system. |
21 to 26 points* Major points are supported by all of the following:
The systems design is partially supported with scholarly research, includes a minimum of two (2) graphical user interfaces (or alternatively justified) that semi-accurately follow UI design standards, and properly identifies needed infrastructure to support the new information system. |
1 to 20 points* Major points are supported by all of the following:
The systems design is insufficiently supported with scholarly research and/or includes less than two (2) graphical user interfaces (or alternatively justified) that semi-accurately follow UI design standards, and/or improperly identifies needed infrastructure to support the new information system. |
0 points Major points were supported.
Analysis, design, and/or questions were not addressed. |
|
Planning/Implementation: Major Design Support |
27 to 30 points* Feasible business problem, requirements gathering, and implementation plan that the project can solve in the given course timeline. SDLC and project methodology are accurate and well supported with scholarly research. |
21 to 26 points* Somewhat feasible business problem, requirements gathering, and implementation plan that the project can solve in the given course timeline. SDLC and project methodology are accurate and supported with scholarly research. |
1 to 20 points* Poorly constructed business problem, requirements gathering, and/or implementation plan that the project cannot solve in the given course timeline. SDLC and project methodology are inaccurate and/or incorrect scholarly resources. |
0 points
SDLC and project methodology are inaccurate and/or unsupported with no scholarly research. |
|
Accuracy of UML / Syntax |
27 to 30 points* Excellent UML syntax is utilized for each analysis and design process and/or diagram(s). |
21 to 26 points* Sufficient UML syntax is utilized for each analysis and design process and/or diagram(s). |
1 to 20 points* Incorrect UML syntax is utilized and/or there are missing analysis and design processes and/or diagram(s). |
0 points No UML syntax is utilized.
|
|
Structure |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Mechanics: Grammar/ Support /Spelling |
Minimal or no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in the desired format. |
7 to 8 points* Between 3-4 spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources (information and graphics) are accurately document, but some are not in the desired format. |
1 to 6 points* Between 5-6) spelling, or punctuation errors. Sources are not accurately documented or formatted. |
0 points More than 7 spelling and grammar errors are present. |
*Please see the Levels of Achievement Points spreadsheet for standardized point values based off your school/department’s grading scale.