System Designs Project

profileFamilyGuy007
System_Design_Project_Grading_Rubric1.docx

System Design project Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Quality of Diagrams/ Processes: Key Components

27 to 30 points*

Information clearly relates to the main topic and includes several supporting details and/or examples within the systems analysis and design processes and diagrams.

21 to 26 points*

Information clearly relates to the main topic, but no details and/or examples are given within the systems analysis and design processes and diagrams.

1 to 20 points*

Information has little relation to the main topic within the systems analysis and design processes and diagrams.

0 points

Information has no relation to the main topic within the systems analysis and design processes and diagrams.

Accuracy of Analysis: Major Design Support

27 to 30 points*

Major points are supported by all of the following:

· All analysis and designs are thoroughly addressed and/or all questions are answered along with diagrams.

· A minimum of five (5) unique UML system analysis models/diagrams exist that accurately analyze the system given the business problem and requirements gathering results.

21 to 26 points*

Major points are supported by all of the following:

· Analysis and design are generally addressed and all questions were answered along with diagrams.

· A minimum of five (5) unique UML system analysis models/diagrams exist that semi-accurately analyze the system given the business problem and requirements gathering results.

1 to 20 points*

Major points are supported by all of the following:

· Analysis, design, and/or questions were not addressed satisfactorily.

· Less than five (5) unique UML system analysis models/diagrams exist and/or five or more diagrams exist that do not accurately analyze the system given the business problem and requirements gathering results.

0 points

Major points were supported.

Analysis, design, and/or questions were not addressed.

Accuracy of Design: Major Design Support

27 to 30 points*

Major points are supported by all of the following:

The systems design is sufficiently supported with scholarly research, includes a minimum of two (2) graphical user interfaces (or alternatively justified) that accurately follow UI design standards, and properly identifies needed infrastructure to support the new information system.

21 to 26 points*

Major points are supported by all of the following:

The systems design is partially supported with scholarly research, includes a minimum of two (2) graphical user interfaces (or alternatively justified) that semi-accurately follow UI design standards, and properly identifies needed infrastructure to support the new information system.

1 to 20 points*

Major points are supported by all of the following:

The systems design is insufficiently supported with scholarly research and/or includes less than two (2) graphical user interfaces (or alternatively justified) that semi-accurately follow UI design standards, and/or improperly identifies needed infrastructure to support the new information system.

0 points

Major points were supported.

Analysis, design, and/or questions were not addressed.

Planning/Implementation: Major Design Support

27 to 30 points*

Feasible business problem, requirements gathering, and implementation plan that the project can solve in the given course timeline. SDLC and project methodology are accurate and well supported with scholarly research.

21 to 26 points*

Somewhat feasible business problem, requirements gathering, and implementation plan that the project can solve in the given course timeline. SDLC and project methodology are accurate and supported with scholarly research.

1 to 20 points*

Poorly constructed business problem, requirements gathering, and/or implementation plan that the project cannot solve in the given course timeline. SDLC and project methodology are inaccurate and/or incorrect scholarly resources.

0 points

SDLC and project methodology are inaccurate and/or unsupported with no scholarly research.

Accuracy of UML / Syntax

27 to 30 points*

Excellent UML syntax is utilized for each analysis and design process and/or diagram(s).

21 to 26 points*

Sufficient UML syntax is utilized for each analysis and design process and/or diagram(s).

1 to 20 points*

Incorrect UML syntax is utilized and/or there are missing analysis and design processes and/or diagram(s).

0 points

No UML syntax is utilized.

Structure

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Mechanics: Grammar/ Support /Spelling

9 to 10 points*

Minimal or no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in the desired format.

7 to 8 points*

Between 3-4 spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources (information and graphics) are accurately document, but some are not in the desired format.

1 to 6 points*

Between 5-6) spelling, or punctuation errors. Sources are not accurately documented or formatted.

0 points

More than 7 spelling and grammar errors are present.

*Please see the Levels of Achievement Points spreadsheet for standardized point values based off your school/department’s grading scale.