War on kuwait

Utilitarian Approaches Aristotelian Approaches

Kantian Approaches

Opinions

Weakness Strength

Weakness Strength

Weakness Strength

1.

Dealing with people involves moral dilemmas (white or black) treat people as ends /Following duty according to Kant.

2.

.

Saddam used Kuwait as a mean to reach his goals/ When people are treated as an end, the world will be a better place.

3.

Aristotle suggests that negotiation should occur first/ The weakness is that sometimes you do not have time for negotiation.

4.

He did not follow a utilitarian approach. Also, his actions do not benefit the majority/ He wanted to benefit his country’s economy.

5.

Dealing with people involves moral dilemmas (white or black) treat people as ends/ Using good will

6.

Not everyone cares about the consequences of their actions/ His actions cannot be universal laws

7.

Every person has his own definition of Eudaimonia and how to reach it/ They followed the final end and strived for Eudaimonia.

8

Saddam didn’t follow moral virtues/ Sulaiman has courage and moral virtue.

9.

Dealing with people involves moral dilemmas (white or black) treat people as ends/ Saddam used Kuwait as mean which contradicts what Kant said.

10.

No weakness/They had better consequences that utilitarianism talked about.