(MSW 526) Module 5: Mindfulness Intervention Research Part 1

profilephaynes
SYLLABUSMSW526Module5MindfulnessInterventionResearchPart1.docx

Module 5: Mindfulness Intervention Research Paper Part 1

Purpose

The purpose of this 2-part assignment is to examine how mindfulness and mindfulness-based interventions are used to facilitate healing and recovery for individuals with histories of trauma. Students will select and receive approval from the instructor regarding a population of focus and trauma type (e.g., bullying, disasters, physical abuse, sexual abuse). In part 1 of this research paper, students will review the literature and describe how mindfulness has been used for their chosen topic.

Requirements

1. The Mindfulness Research Paper Part 1 is worth 220 points and will be graded on use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.

2. Define Your Goal - You are providing a self-contained review of writings on a topic related to mindfulness; therefore, you want to state your project’s purpose. At the beginning of your paper, define your paper’s purpose so that the literature review will be anchored to a specific point of view.

3. Ground Summary in Relevance - As you summarize each publication, provide the context for that publication’s importance by tying its main points to your thesis, hypothesis, or project statement. How does it relate? Establish its relevance to the discussion.

4. The length of the paper is to be no less than 6 pages and no greater than 8 pages excluding the title and reference pages.

Directions

1. Concisely describe and provide background information regarding the population of focus and trauma type. If necessary, define key terms.

2. Based on your review of the literature, describe how mindfulness has been used for your chosen topic. Review and only include credible and relevant sources.

3. Identify the mindfulness-based intervention that will be evaluated. Succinctly describe the intervention, including its history and a short description of what participants can expect to experience (e.g., what specific techniques or procedures are involved).

4. State the aim of your literature review. Identify your research question.

Grading Criteria

Criteria

Points

Description

Paper is well-organized, clear, free of typos and grammatical errors

40

The paper is extremely well organized and completely free of grammatical errors and typos.

You have chosen sources that are rooted in rigorous and reputable research methods

60

The sources chosen are exceptional. The sources are rooted in rigorous and reputable research.

You have demonstrated clear knowledge on the chosen topic

40

The paper demonstrates the student has exemplary knowledge of the chosen topic.

You have demonstrated clear knowledge of the specific mindfulness-based intervention

40

The paper demonstrates the student has exemplary knowledge of the mindfulness-based intervention. 

Sources are appropriately integrated throughout the paper and are cited using APA style

40

The paper does an exemplary job of integrating source and using APA format.

Total

220

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Rubric

Mindfulness Intervention Research Paper Part 1

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Paper is well-organized, clear, free of typos and grammatical errors

40 pts

Highest Level of performance

The paper is extremely well organized and completely free of grammatical errors and typos.

35 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

The paper is well organized and is almost free of grammatical errors and typos.

30 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

The paper is somewhat organized and includes some grammatical errors and typos.

20 pts

Failing Level of Performance

The paper is not at all organized and completely includes numerous errors

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

You have chosen sources that are rooted in rigorous and reputable research methods

60 pts

Highest Level of performance

The sources chosen are exceptional. The sources are rooted in rigorous and reputable research.

55 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

The sources chosen are strong. The sources are mostly rooted in rigorous and reputable research.

50 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

The sources chosen are fair. The sources are somewhat rooted in rigorous and reputable research.

40 pts

Failing Level of Performance

The sources chosen are weak. The sources are not rooted in rigorous and reputable research.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

You have demonstrated clear knowledge on the topic

40 pts

Highest Level of performance

The paper demonstrates that the student has exemplary knowledge of the topic.

35 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

The paper demonstrates the student has strong knowledge of the topic.

30 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

The paper demonstrates the student has moderate knowledge of the topic.

20 pts

Failing Level of Performance

The paper demonstrates the student has little knowledge of the topic.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

You have demonstrated clear knowledge of the specific mindfulness-based intervention

40 pts

Highest Level of performance

The paper demonstrates that the student has exemplary knowledge of the specific mindfulness-based intervention.

35 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

The paper demonstrates the student has strong knowledge of the mindfulness-based intervention.

30 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

The paper demonstrates the student has moderate knowledge of the mindfulness-based intervention.

20 pts

Failing Level of Performance

The paper demonstrates the student has little knowledge of the specific mindfulness-based intervention.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

7-Sources are appropriately integrated throughout the paper and are cited using APA Style.

40 pts

Highest Level of performance

Sources are properly integrated. Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammatical errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning. APA properly formatted with no more than one to two minor errors.

35 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Sources are properly integrated. Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammatical errors. Generally organized thoughts and concepts. Some APA errors in formatting with three to five errors and/or one to two citations missing.

30 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Sources are missing or not well integrated. Language needs development or lack of original thought evident. Four or five spelling and/or grammatical errors. APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or selected citations are missing.

20 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Sources are not integrated. The paper is not at all organized. Language lacks development and a lack of original thought is evident. Multiple spelling and/or grammatical errors. APA formatting contains multiple errors and selected citations are missing.

40 pts

Total Points