essay expert
Individual Strategic Analysis
Swedish Match, AB
Table of Contents
I. Introduction 2
Business Case 2
Problem Statement 2
Mission Statement 2
Vision Statement 3
II. External Assessment 3
General Environment 3
Economic 3
Demographic 3
Political/Legal 3-4
Socio-cultural 4
Technological 5
Global 5
III. Competitive Environment 5
Industry Analysis 5
Economic Structure 5
Life Cycle Stage 6
Porter 5 Forces Model 6-7
Industry Attractiveness 7
Strategic Group Analysis 8
Key Success Factors 8-9
Competitor Analysis Model 9-10
IV. Internal Assessment 10
Nature of the Firm 10
Culture & Leadership 10-11
Organizational Structure 12-13
Value Chain Analysis 13-14
Core Competence 14
Financial Ratio Analysis 14-15
V. Strategic Choice 16
SWOT Analysis 16-17
General Strategic Orientation 17
Grand Strategy Clusters 17-18
Grand Strategy Selection Matrix 18
BCG Matrix 19
VI. Recommendations 19
Corporate Level Strategy 19
Business Level Strategy 19
VII. Managerial Implications 19-20
VIII. References 20-21
Swedish Match, AB
I. Introduction
Business Case
Swedish Match is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden and is traded on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol SWMAY. Swedish Match manufactures and markets smokeless tobacco, cigars, and pipe tobacco. It is also the world's largest producer of matches and the number three makers of disposable lighters under the brand name Cricket. Swedish Match has 14,343 employees and manufactures its products in 26 plants and 15 countries and sells its products in 140 countries. As one can see Swedish Match is a well-diversified company with revenues generated from many product areas.
Swedish Match is the only global producer of snuff and holds a leading position in the Nordic snuff market and in South Africa. In the U.S., Swedish Match competes against United Smokeless Tobacco, Conwood Inc., Swisher International and National Tobacco Company, LP. In the United States, Swedish Match faces fierce rivalry in the chewing tobacco, snuff, and loose-leaf segments within the smokeless tobacco industry. Within the United States, Swedish Match has the largest market share in the rapidly expanding value-priced segment. In 2001, Swedish Match had over $1.78 billion in sales spread across its various product lines.
History
The origins of Swedish Match and disposable lighter operations can be traced back to Svenska Tandsticks AB, which was founded in 1917. After a consolidation period from 1917-1932, two large companies replaced the twenty independent match manufacturing plants creating Svenska Tandsticks Aktiebolag with Ivar Kreuger as the President. The match company later changed its name to Svenska Tobaks AB (SWA). In 1984 after being transferred to the Swedish holding company Statsforetag AB, SWA was renamed Procordia AB in 1984. In 1985, Procordia acquired Pinkerton Tobacco Company, the leading manufacturer of chewing tobacco in the United States. Volvo acquired 40% of the shares of Procordia and in 1992 acquired Swedish Match, for its match and lighter business. In 1993, Procordia changed its name to Swedish Match to take advantage of its well-known and established name. In January 1997, Swedish Match reorganized into a single group of companies with global product divisions and regional sales organizations for all products. In September 1999 Swedish Match acquired 80% of Leonard Dingler Ltd. In South Africa, 64% of General Cigar Holdings, and a distribution company Bresant in 2000. After a host of mergers and acquisitions Swedish Match has come to be a global company with product lines that include matches, lighters, cigars, pipes, chewing tobacco, snuff, and other operations that make them a significant player in the global market.
Mission Statement
Swedish Match is uniquely positioned among the worlds tobacco companies for continuing to build strong and sustainable operations in the tobacco area aided by strategies that work in harmony with social trends and not against them.
Vision Statement
Swedish Match intends to be a unique company, using its world leading brands and niche tobacco products to work in growing markets in harmony with current social and consumer trends.
Problem Statement
How can Swedish Match continue to gain market share in the United States while maintaining its position globally in a mature slow growth industry?
II. External Assessment: Smokeless Tobacco Segment of the Tobacco Industry
A. General Environment
The smokeless tobacco industry is both highly competitive and highly regulated. As a result of government involvement, regulation, and excise taxes the incumbents have remained steady over time with almost no new competition. Due to the threats of increased taxes and declining consumption trends in all areas of tobacco except for moist snuff, new companies fear entering such a volatile industry. Within the global environment companies positioned in the United States face strong barriers to entry and competition to bring their products abroad. Due to limitations on advertising, smokeless tobacco companies spend tremendous amounts of revenue promoting their brand name to increase market share.
Economic Opportunities
· The sale of moist snuff has increased from 1990-2001 making it a segment worth pursuing. It is on a growth curve, increasing at about 3% annually across all retail channels.
· $1.8 billion industry.
· The demand for tobacco is relatively inelastic and as a result the demand for smokeless tobacco is not affected by fluctuations in price, keeping demand steady.
Threats
· The price of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products are comparable in price making cigarette smokers’ switch to smokeless tobacco products even more difficult.
· There is a slight move towards price sensitivity as of 2001, not characterized in earlier years.
Demographic
Opportunities
· Between 5 million and 8 million Americans use moist smokeless tobacco, while 46 million Americans smoke.
· Nearly half of the five million-plus adults who dip snuff have spent at least some time in college, according to the most recent statistics from the Department of Health and Human Services.
· Tobacco products are consumed in higher quantities by young adults.
· Male high school students (11.6 percent) were significantly more likely to use smokeless tobacco products. Due to the large amount of underage smokeless tobacco users as these younger adults reach the age of majority this segment can sustain growth for the future of smokeless tobacco.
Threats
· Due to the amount of young people using smokeless tobacco products there has been an increase in litigation and tight regulation. As a result higher excise taxes and underage prevention cause increases in prices that are passed on to the consumer.
Political/Legal Regulatory
Opportunities
· As a result of certain bans on advertising media, smokeless tobacco companies have found alternative means to distinguish their brands from the like.
· Advertising in magazines, at auto races, rodeos, and direct mail campaigns have been crucial in boosting sales and developing brand loyalty among consumers.17
· The Federal Trade Commission sent out advertisements, which would help educate users in regards to smokeless tobacco use being better for one’s health in comparison to cigarettes.
· When cigarette prices and taxes increase without corresponding increases to other tobacco products taxes and prices, some adult, and especially youths will use smokeless tobacco rather than quitting or avoiding tobacco use altogether. By preventing children from using smokeless tobacco and therefore limiting regulation and less taxes more adults will switch from cigarettes to smokeless tobacco.
Threats
· Smokeless Tobacco Health Education Act of October 1986.
· The 1986 law called for three rotating labels warning that the products could cause mouth cancer; that they could cause gum disease and/or tooth loss; and that smokeless tobacco is not a safe alternative to cigarette smoking.
· Much of the tobacco industry, including moist snuff, is banned from advertising on the radio and television and is subject to other advertising restrictions. This causes companies to advertise in unconventional ways to attract customers.
· Australia, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Tasmania, Thailand, and the United Kingdom, have imposed stiff restrictions on snuff which threatens international growth and development.
· The sale of moist snuff within the European Union was banned in 1992 as a result of cancer causing agents. This limits the potential growth of smokeless tobacco abroad.
· Federal Excise Tax.
· One study found that a 10 percent increase in smokeless tobacco prices reduces adult consumption by 3.7 percent.
Socio-cultural
Opportunities
· A number of medical researchers believe that cigarette abusers can kick their habit, and reduce their health risks by simply switching to a less-hazardous alternative, such as smokeless tobacco.
· Research shows that about half of the nation’s 46 million adult smokers are interested in a socially acceptable option to cigarettes when they are not able to smoke .
· Male athletes are frequent users of snuff and chewing tobacco (Walsh).
· Studies have found the use of smokeless tobacco in college baseball to be between 52%-55%.
· Studies have also found the use of smokeless tobacco in college football to be between 26%-36%.
Threats
· Smoking is increasingly considered socially unacceptable, but spitting is not considered any better.
· Consumers of today are becoming more and more health conscious. Increased health risks are associated with smokeless tobacco.
· Professional baseball bans smokeless tobacco in 1997.
· 33% to 44% of Professional Baseball Players are known to be heavy users of smokeless tobacco.
· The Surgeon General has found that snuff is not a “safe substitute for cigarettes.”
· Education of today, has informed consumers better on the effects of smoking.
Technological Factors
Opportunities
· Non-Spit tobacco coupled with innovations in pouch packaging to improve ease of use is aimed at increasing smokeless tobacco’s social acceptance.
Threats
· Online Cigarette Buying
· It is illegal for anyone under the age of 18 to purchase cigarettes, but lawmakers say the relative anonymity of the Internet allows minors to use their parents’ credit card to purchase cigarettes online.
· "Nobody is checking who is going online. Nobody is checking who is buying cigarettes, and that is why kids are going online.”
Global Factors
Opportunities
· Most of the expansion for tobacco products is going to be outside the United States.
· Since 1980, smoking among males in Sweden has dropped to 17.1% from 36.3%.
· During the same time frame, smokeless tobacco use in Sweden has increased to 18.2% from 16.6%.
· 900,000 snuff users in Sweden.
· Over 1 billion smokers in the world.
Threats
· Moist smokeless tobacco products were little known outside of the United States and Sweden, where they originated.
Summary
The smokeless tobacco segment is facing fierce regulation on the sale of smokeless tobacco products. With an increase in excise taxes, barriers for international expansion, and strict adherence to advertising restrictions; smokeless tobacco companies must find unconventional ways to promote their brand and attract and maintain customers. With over 46 million American who smoke and 1 billion worldwide, the smokeless tobacco segment has a great opportunity for growth in switching cigarette users to users of smokeless tobacco to increase market share. The moist snuff segment in the tobacco industry has shown upward growth and shows much opportunity for smokeless tobacco companies to seize this segment. As a result of many deterrents in the tobacco industry, companies must continue to find socially acceptable ways to increase demand.
III. Competitive Environment: Smokeless Tobacco
Economic Structure: The economic structure within the smokeless tobacco industry is that of a tight oligopoly nationally and a duopoly internationally. Nationally, five companies compete for market share with UST holding a 40.5 percent share, Conwood with 23.8 percent, Swedish Match with 20.5 percent, National with 7.5 percent, and Swisher with a 6.5 percent market share. UST and Swedish Match form a duopoly. Swedish Match has a monopoly globally with 99% of the market in Sweden and South Africa and UST has a monopoly power nationally with 75% of the moist snuff market and 40.5 percent total share in the U.S. Both companies have a monopoly in their respective regions being market leaders and having the highest sales.
Moist Snuff Market Share
76%
6%
13%
5%0%
UST
Swedish
Conwood
Life Cycle Stage: The smokeless tobacco segment has been present throughout history and is in its maturity stage with the consumption trend shifting from loose leaf tobacco to moist snuff; nonetheless, there are still a large number of consumers who use both products. This industry has undergone much consolidation over the years and five major players survived the shakeout within the industry. This industry is categorized by hyper-competition and as result futile price-cutting occurs. By looking at the financials of UST and Swedish Match we can see that growth has leveled off. The companies are maximizing there leverage effect and acquiring new companies to expand their reach and market share. Also by looking at both companies financials we can see they have established financial policies which is indicative of companies in a mature industry.
Porter’s Five Forces Model
Threat of New Entrants: The threat of new entrants into the smokeless tobacco market is very low. New entrants face high barriers to entry including fierce competition from incumbents, high fixed costs such as manufacturing equipment and warehousing, high capital requirements for advertising and marketing, and extreme brand loyalty. Entrants lack the access to raw materials, desirable locations, and technology. Within the industry there is a declining consumption trend in all areas of smokeless tobacco except moist snuff, leaving little room for new entrants. The distribution channels such as smoke shops, convenience stores, and super markets are extremely scarce and crowded. Due to government anti-tobacco measures, increase in tobacco taxes, health warnings, and advertising prohibitions make it hard for new entrants to survive. Smokeless tobacco companies have long-term relationships with their buyers and suppliers. To become a significant player in the industry one must acquire or merge with an existing firm to have the necessary knowledge and capital to survive.
Threat of Substitutes is High: There has been an increase in substitutes hurting the profits of the smokeless tobacco companies. Regulation has made smokeless tobacco products and there substitutes very similar in price creating low switching costs for the consumer. Customers have a wide variety of products to use to get their nicotine fix. Nicotine gums and patches, nicotine replacement therapy products such as Nicorette’s In-halator product or Novartis’s Consumer Health’s Nicotinell range serve as substitutes. Also, cigars and cigarettes are the most common form of nicotine substitutes.
Bargaining Power of Buyers: The bargaining power of buyers within the industry is low. The wholesalers are the buyers of the smokeless tobacco products and have no chance of backward integration due to the high fixed costs and capital requirements of the industry. The firms within the industry face minimal switching costs if they were forced to change wholesalers.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: The bargaining power of suppliers is low. The tobacco farmers and suppliers of other raw materials have no chance of integrating forward into the industry. Tobacco as well as many of the other raw materials are commodity products and can be obtained from various suppliers. The industry has created a monopsony where the tobacco companies can set the prices in which other companies then follow.
Rivalry: Rivalry within the industry is intense. Due to the slow paced growth of the industry, firms are constantly involved in price-cutting and fighting for market share. Due to constant innovation and differentiation firms must continue to develop new products to meet customer demand. UST is the monopoly power nationally in moist snuff creating high strategic stakes within the industry because Swedish Match, Conwood, Swisher, and National all want a piece of the only growing segment. There are also high strategic stakes globally because Swedish Match has a monopoly in the international market and the incumbent firms would like a piece of this market. Finally, the barriers for exit are high due to the specialized nature of knowledge and equipment.
INDUSTRY ATTRACTIVENESS
The smokeless tobacco industry is a consolidated mature industry. It has a highly developed market with fierce rivalry. Both buyers and suppliers have little power due to the high capital costs and due to the vast array of substitutes firms must spend tremendous amounts of money in advertising to keep and attract customers.
New Entrants – The attractiveness for new entrants into this market is extremely low. Due to the tight government regulation, brand loyalty, high capital requirements, and high fixed costs it is very unattractive for new firms to try and enter this market.
Incumbents – The attractiveness for those incumbents within the industry is high. Even though moist snuff is the only market that is growing; the other segments within the industry have great opportunity for sales allowing those within the industry to take advantage. Due to the large amount of smokers nationally and globally who are looking for a socially acceptable substitute; smokeless tobacco can provide this option. Also with the increased health risks of smoking and the large population of smokers, the switch to a smokeless tobacco product rather than a cigarette can increase the total profits throughout the industry. Finally, the incumbents already have brand loyalty and market share enabling them to steal customers from their competition through their brand and innovative products.
Swedish Match – The industry is very attractive to Swedish Match considering it already has the largest market share in the value brand segment of the smokeless tobacco industry. In 2001 Swedish Match’s sales grew 19% in volume through its popular Timber Wolf brand. Swedish Match also has the largest market share in the chewing tobacco or loose-leaf market. Swedish Match has strong brand equity through its product line and as a result has many loyal customers. Through its various acquisitions Swedish Match has gained valuable distribution networks, manufacturing capabilities, and a global presence giving it an edge over the competition. Swedish Match continues to grow through innovation and will continue to be a major player in the industry.
Strategic Group Analysis
Strategic Group for Smokeless Tobacco
Geographic
Global
Multi-
National
National
One Brand Moderate Brands Many Brands
Product Differentiation
Swedish Match competes within the smokeless tobacco industry. There is rivalry among all of the firms within the industry. The strategic group analysis shows that Swedish Match has a monopoly globally, moderate national position, with a moderate number of brands. UST has monopoly power within the U.S. market, but lacks a global presence, but has a large amount of brands. Conwood has moderate position nationally little global presence and moderate amount of brands. Swisher has a small share of the national market with a moderate amount of brands and a greater global presence then Conwood. Finally, National has a few brands with little global and national presence.
Key Success Factors (1 (lowest) through 3 (highest))
|
Company |
Brand |
Product Differentiation/Innovation |
Market Share (U.S) |
Globalization |
|
UST |
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
|
Swedish Match |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
Within the smokeless tobacco industry, consumers are very brand loyal which is a reason why both Swedish Match and UST are so successful within their market. Having brands such as Timber Wolf, Kodiak, Copenhagen, and Skoal between the two they have three of the leading brands in the industry. Both firms are constantly involved in product differentiation through innovation to sustain and attract new customers. Within such a tight industry the only way to gain market share is to differentiate the product from those of the competitor. U.S. market share is extremely important for the industry because the U.S. boasts the greatest use of smokeless tobacco products. UST is the market leader with a 40.5% share and Swedish Match has only 20.5%market share. However, Swedish Match has all the necessary key success factors to remain competitive and grow within the industry. This is shown through their dominance within the global arena.
Competitor Analysis Model
|
|
UST |
Swedish Match |
|
Goals |
· Further growth of smokeless tobacco consumers. Reaching out to the 40 to 50 million adult cigarette smokers; who are looking for alternative forms of nicotine satisfaction. · The ultimate objective is to build awareness of the smokeless tobacco category, increase social acceptability of its products, and improve the ease of use for adult consumers entering the category. · Increase sales internationally · Increase sales nationally in both the value brand and chewing tobacco segments. |
· To grow its niche tobacco and smoking accessories markets, particularly in Europe and North America.
|
|
Assumptions |
· The players in the tobacco industry will remain the same. · Litigation will stay at the same rate. · There will continue to be only one growing segment in the tobacco industry (snuff). |
· Overturning the ban on smokeless tobacco in the European Union. · Cigarette consumption will decrease based on increasing concern about the effects of cigarette smoking on health. |
|
Strategies |
· To move into foreign markets · Continue to hold the monopoly power in the U.S. |
· To expand operations and marketing in North America/United States. · Continue to hold the monopoly power globally. |
|
Capabilities |
· Providing customers with a wide variety of products (Copenhagen, Skoal, Rooster, Red Seal) · Manufacturing of smokeless tobacco. · Marketing and Sales of their brand name. |
· Providing customers with a wide arrange of tobacco products (Chewing Tobacco, Snuff, Pipes, lighters and matches). · Strong markets in United States, Germany, France, South Africa, and the Netherlands. · Excellent distribution networks and manufacturing capabilities as a result of acquisitions. |
|
Vulnerability |
· Dependent on national market. · Greatest amount of sales and dependency on smokeless segment. · Increasing legal restriction on marketing of tobacco products. This makes it difficult to establish new brands, thereby increasing the value of the existing brands.45 · Lack of globalization. |
· Dependent on International buyers and suppliers. · Increasing legal restriction on marketing of tobacco products. This makes it difficult to establish new brands, thereby increasing the value of the existing brands. |
Response:
Swedish Match leads the global area of smokeless tobacco and UST leads nationally. Swedish Match is going to have to put forth a strong effort to try and gain market share from this national monopoly power. UST offers a variety of smokeless tobacco products and has the two leading brands with over a billion dollars in sales each. UST may become vulnerable nationally if it tries to expand globally because it could give Swedish Match the opportunity to use its global knowledge to increase its share in America. An increase in government regulation over the years can cause significant harm to UST due to their large dependency on smokeless tobacco. Conversely, Swedish Match provides customers with a wide array of niche tobacco products ranging from chewing tobacco, snuff, pipes, lighters and matches and is better diversified if such a problem may come to exist. Swedish Match’s response is to continue to market its snuff products as substitutes for cigarettes, while continuing to innovate and design more socially acceptable products.
IV. Internal Assessment
Nature of the Firm
Culture
Swedish Match started out as a simple match manufacturing company and throughout the 1900’s has come to be a major competitor in the many segments within the tobacco industry through multiple acquisitions. Efforts have been underway to strengthen Swedish Match’s common, global, corporate culture, to develop synergies and integrate the many company acquisitions made since 1999.
Swedish Match’s corporate culture is centered on its six main core values: communication, teamwork, trust, innovation, recognition, and growth. Through programs such as the International Managers Program or the International trainee program; Swedish Match looks to strengthen its leadership skills, intercultural management, and teamwork. Swedish Match emphasizes teamwork so that all levels within the organization are able to facilitate one another. Swedish Match emphasizes environmental protection putting forward policies that are in line with government regulation and ensuring environment sustainability. As Swedish Match moves ahead in its goals there primary objective is to maximize share-holder value while keeping in mind the interests of all its stakeholders.
Leadership
Swedish Match is headed by Lennart Sunden, who joined Swedish Match in 1999 as the President and CEO and sits on the Board of Directors. Mr. Sunden holds a MBA in Engineering and spent twenty one years at AB Electrolux where he held many management positions ranging from industrial to global operations. When Mr. Sunden first came to the firm he brought with him vast marketing knowledge with the idea of repositioning Swedish Match to focus on a smokeless strategy to capitalize on the health risks associated with smoking and the huge profits that could be captured in the smokeless industry.
Sven Hindrikes is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer who joined the Swedish Match team in 1998. He holds a MBA in economics and business administration from the Stockholm School of Economics. Mr. Hindrikes has had much experience working in a global atmosphere working in Mexico as a CFO and at ABB Canada where he was president of power distribution and executive vice president.
Massimo Rossi is the Senior Executive Advisor of Swedish Match and has been a member of the Group management since 1992. Mr. Rossi has extensive experience in international business being with Swedish Match for over 24 years. He has been involved with the more than the 60 acquisitions and divestments and has implemented strategic sales of 25 match companies in 25 countries in only two years.
Brent Magnusson sits as Chairman of the Board since 1993.
Swedish Match has five different divisions which include their North American Division, Continental Europe, Northern Europe, Overseas Division, and Match Division all headed by Presidents. Within the Swedish Match organization employee representatives sit on the board of directors and round off the management team. These representatives make sure that the interests of all employees are heard within the organizational chain.
Swedish Match’s management team and Board of Directors are committed to enhancing shareholders value. To further increase senior executives’ involvement in, and ownership of, the Company, the Board of Directors decided in 1999 to introduce an ongoing options program.
Through the global operations of Swedish Match teamwork is extremely necessary and emphasized greatly within the organization. As shown through their management structure and culture, Swedish Match makes sure each individual has a say.
Organizational Structure:
Organizational Structure Analysis
In the years preceding 1999, before Swedish Match divested its cigarette company and began the host of acquisitions from 1999-2001 they had a matrix organizational structure. As a result of the horizontal integration that occurred in 1999-2001, Swedish Match went from this matrix organizational form to a cooperative multidivisional structure with a transnational strategy. As a result of the firm’s corporate culture they emphasize cooperative sharing as emphasized in their core value of teamwork. Through this structure Swedish Match has brought about interdivisional cooperation, with direct profit responsibility, a strengthening market focus, and has created direct links between group management and its operational units. As a result, Swedish Match has successfully achieved economies of scope where they have transferred their capabilities in manufacturing and marketing across their various geographic divisions. Swedish Match can manufacture snuff, chewing tobacco, and cigars at the same plant in numerous geographic areas. They also have the capability of using their various distribution channels to distribute their multiple product lines across many channels. Both of these activities have created a core competence for the firm.
The corporate functions of the firm are centralized at their corporate office and the company is divided into four geographic divisions; Northern Europe, Continental Europe, North America, and Overseas as well as a Match Division. This enables the firm to have centralized strategic planning, but also allows for each unit to make decisions based on local responsiveness. Each geographical division markets and manufactures its own products to relate to the individual and cultural needs within the region.
Value-Chain Analysis
|
Margin |
|||||
|
Firm Infrastructure |
S1Infra,S2Infra, |
S3 Infra,S4 Infra |
S5Infra,S6Infra, |
S7Infra |
|
|
Human Resources |
S17HR |
S15HR,S16HR |
|
|
|
|
Technology |
S11Tech |
S11Tech,S12Tech |
S13Tech |
|
|
|
Procurement |
S8Pro |
|
S14Tech
|
S9Pro,S10Pro |
|
|
|
Inventory and warehousing of tobacco. Raw material selection. W5 |
Production of Snuff (Snus) and chewing tobacco. Packaging, processing, and grinding. Quality standards
|
Distribution channels acquired:Leonard Dingier, Maga spa, Brasant in Sweden, South Africa, Italy, Asia, and U.S. Warehousing
|
Marketing of (Other Tobacco Products) Sell to various outlets. W2 W3 W4
|
W1 |
|
|
Inbound Logistics |
Operations |
Outbound Logistics |
Marketing & Sales |
Service |
|
Margin |
Value Chain Analysis
S1Infra- Results-oriented culture.
S2Infra- Legal team to fight regulation and litigation on snuff.
S3Infra- Core values in firm.
S4Infra- Continuous auditing committee to oversee financials.
S5Infra- Employee Representatives on the Board of Directors ensure that employee interests are aligned with management and shareholders interest.
S6Infra-Constant focus on structural measures through cost efficiency
S7Infra-Experienced and Knowledgeable upper management.
S8Pro- Purchasing tobacco leaves from suppliers in multiple countries.
S9Pro-TEMO carries out comprehensive consumer surveys on behalf of Swedish Match each year .
S10Pro- In late 2000, hired marketing agency DraftWorldwide to overhaul its web marketing strategy with its Swan brand. The aim of the site will be to build the brand’s reputation among youth .
S11Tech- Gothiatek technologies standard for Swedish Snuff during manufacturing and procurement.
S12Tech-Manufacturing (ISO 14001) – Satellite plant
S13Tech- Use of the Internet as an information channel.
S14Tech- Distribution system reaches 140 countries.
S15HR- Trainee Program for all employees.
S16HR- International Managers Program keeps operations consistent.
S17HR- Intellectual Capital for innovating products and developmental programs.
W1 –Lack of service provided.
W2- Decline in pipe tobacco sales.
W3- Decline in lighter segment.
W4- only marketing in Sweden point of sale
W5- Poor supplier relations.
Core competence- Swedish Match’s core competence lies in their quality and innovative product designs and worldwide distribution network. They use their distribution channels to create brand awareness and supply their products throughout the world. There careful material selection and Gothiatek standard helps maintain a differentiated product that is meaningful to the consumer.
Competitive Advantage: Swedish Match’s competitive advantage is their brand equity. Through innovation and quality products Swedish Match creates a strong brand name which is increased through the ease of distribution throughout the world. This competitive advantage allows for customer loyalty and creates above average returns.
Financials
|
|
UST |
Swedish Match |
||||||
|
|
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
|
Sales ($M) |
1,423 |
1,484 |
1,548 |
1,670 |
1,068 |
1,227 |
1,503 |
1,776 |
|
Cost of Goods Sold ($M) |
225.43 |
239.35 |
255.2 |
269.11 |
509.406 |
647.51 |
842.15 |
965.01 |
|
Net Income ($M) |
455.28 |
469 |
442 |
492 |
95 |
607 |
150 |
160 |
|
Sales Growth (%) |
N/A |
4.29 |
4.31 |
7.88 |
N/A |
14.96 |
22.43 |
18.23 |
|
Change in COGS (%) |
N/A |
6.17 |
6.62 |
5.45 |
N/A |
27.11 |
30.06 |
14.59 |
|
NI Growth (%) |
N/A |
3.01 |
-5.76 |
11.31 |
N/A |
541.33 |
-75.24 |
6.50 |
|
Margins |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
|
Gross Profit Margin |
N/A |
81.5 |
81.33 |
81.19 |
|
46.07 |
45.2 |
44.33 |
|
Operating Profit Margin |
N/A |
53.58 |
52.42 |
51.44 |
|
19.11 |
18.34 |
16.91 |
|
Balance Sheet Data |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
|
Short Term Debt ($M) |
0 |
70.97 |
0 |
3.3 |
335.2 |
121.944 |
138.23 |
122.9 |
|
Long Term Debt ($M) |
100 |
411 |
869.18 |
862.58 |
273.33 |
663.53 |
604.25 |
660.80 |
|
Total Debt ($M) |
100 |
481.97 |
869.18 |
865.88 |
608.53 |
785.48 |
742.48 |
783.70 |
|
Ratios |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
|
Current Ratio |
N/A |
2.08 |
2.59 |
3.11 |
N/A |
1.43 |
1.67 |
1.85 |
|
Quick Ratio |
N/A |
0.48 |
0.63 |
0.86 |
N/A |
1 |
1.16 |
1.23 |
|
FAT Ratio |
N/A |
4.1008 |
4.3170 |
4.5188 |
N/A |
5.0482 |
4.4771 |
4.5909 |
|
TIE |
N/A |
55.2329 |
15.9187 |
12.8910 |
N/A |
17.4308 |
5.0047 |
5.5205 |
|
ROA |
N/A |
56.5800 |
54.3200 |
48.7400 |
N/A |
21.7200 |
20.3100 |
18.4300 |
|
ROE |
N/A |
2.3357 |
1.6336 |
0.8467 |
N/A |
0.7838 |
0.2488 |
0.2991 |
|
ROI |
N/A |
27.45 |
31.18 |
27.45 |
N/A |
87.09 |
83.16 |
73.55 |
|
Debt/Equity |
N/A |
2.4002 |
3.2124 |
1.4902 |
N/A |
1.0150 |
1.2296 |
1.4654 |
|
Inventory Turnover |
N/A |
.75 |
.70 |
.65 |
|
2.46 |
2.50 |
2.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data For Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Plant and Equipment ($M) |
338.695 |
361.882 |
358.586 |
369.568 |
|
243.108 |
335.61 |
386.94 |
|
EBIT ($M) |
|
865.5 |
765.85 |
865.5 |
|
733.49 |
278.41 |
292.75 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
15.67 |
48.11 |
67.14 |
|
42.08 |
55.63 |
53.03 |
|
Total Equity (In Millions) |
|
200.8 |
270.57 |
581.06 |
|
773.88 |
603.86 |
534.81 |
Although both firms have been growing in term of sales, Swedish Match has experienced a more rapid growth in which they surpassed UST in sales in 2001. Over the past 3 years, UST has had a significantly higher return on their assets in comparison to Swedish Match. This is due in large part to the firm maximizing their operating leverage, when they increased their long-term debt in 2000 to $869.18 million.
Profit Margins and Operating Margins have remained steady over the 3-year period for both UST and Swedish Match and show how profitable the company’s are through there operations. UST has both a greater profit and operating margin through 1999-2001. Looking at the value chain one can see Swedish Match has efficient operations in their production which in turn helps profits.
Both Swedish Match and UST are in comfortable positions regarding their leverage. Both companies have around 30% debt to total assets and are more than capable of paying there interest payments as shown by the Time Interest Earned. Swedish Match has a much lower TIE making them unable to pay their annual interest payments if something were to drastically go wrong in the future. Looking at the ROI for both UST and Swedish Match we can see that they have made good returns on invested capital and the return on the owner’s capital is magnified. Looking at the debt to equity, Swedish Match has a debt to equity greater than 1 meaning it has more debt to equity, but should still be able to borrow additional funds.
By examining the quick ratio we can see that UST has more of its money tied up in its inventory meaning they could not pay off its short term obligations without liquidating its inventory putting Swedish Match in a better liquidity position.
Swedish Match turns over its inventory about 2.5 times per year while UST does not even turn its inventory around once a year. This shows that Swedish Match may have a fresher product, which would serve as another capability. If we were to look at the amount of time it takes to acquire accounts receivable; UST averages about 18 days and Swedish Match takes about 70-75 days. This could hurt Swedish Match because it prevents them from investing in productive assets of their firm
In 1999, Swedish Match saw a significant increase in their net income when they divested their cigarette operations. From this divestiture, the company reported a 541% increase in their net income. After Swedish Match finished this sale, the company began to focus more on their core products and was able to increase sales over the next 2 years in comparison to 1999.
IV. STRATEGIC CHOICE
SWOT ANALYSIS
|
Strengths Results-oriented culture. Legal team to fight regulation and litigation on snuff. Core values in corporate. Continuous auditing committee to oversee financials. Employee Representatives on the Board of Directors ensure that employee interests are aligned with management and shareholders interest. Experienced and Knowledgeable upper management. Purchasing tobacco leaves from suppliers in multiple countries. Gothiatek technologies standard for Swedish Snuff (snus). Use of the Internet as an information channel. Distribution system reaches 140 countries. Trainee Program for all employees. International Managers Program keeps operations consistent. Intellectual Capital for innovating products and developmental programs. TEMO carries out comprehensive consumer surveys on behalf of Swedish Match each year .
|
Opportunities The sale of moist snuff is increasing at about 3% annually. $1.8 billion market Tobacco demand is inelastic 46 million American smoke, 1 billion worldwide 5 million snuff users have spent some time in college A majority of young adults use smokeless tobacco products Firms have developed alternative means to advertising FTC says smokeless tobacco is better alternative than smoking People are interested in a socially acceptable alternative to smoking Innovation has made smokeless tobacco more acceptable. (snuff pouches, no-spit) Most expansion outside the U.S. |
|
Weaknesses Lack of customer service. Lack of committed supplier relations. Declining lighter segment. Lower volumes in pipe tobacco. Only marketing in Sweden is point of sales. |
Threats Cigarettes and smokeless tobacco are similar in price There is move towards customers being price sensitive The amount of young people using the product has caused increase in litigation and taxes. Smokeless Tobacco Health Education Act Advertising ban on certain media Stiff restrictions on snuff in various countries. Snuff ban in European Union Spitting is not socially acceptable Move towards a healthier lifestyle Smokeless tobacco is little known outside the U.S. and Sweden |
With an experienced and knowledgeable upper management team and result oriented culture, Swedish Match can take advantage of the $1.8 billion smokeless market and capitalize on the huge potential of switching smokers to smokeless tobacco products. An increase in taxes may cause problems within this area because cigarette and smokeless tobacco products are similar in price. Through Swedish Match’s innovative designs and Gothiatek standards they can improve the social acceptance of smokeless tobacco making it a better substitute for cigarettes. As a result of increasing litigation, taxes, and ban on certain advertising media Swedish Match must use their legal team effectively and find conventional ways to promote their products and brands. Due to the lower volumes in pipe tobacco and declining lighter segment, Swedish Match may turn their focus on the snuff market which is growing at 3% nationally.
General Strategic Orientation
Weakness
Turnaround Defensive
(Over come weakness) (Redirect involvement)
Opportunity Threat
Aggressive Diversification
(Growth) (Opportunities in other markets)
Strength
Since Swedish Match possesses many strengths as a result of its many acquisitions. They should focus on aggressive growth by using its valuable distribution networks and manufacturing expertise to get an edge on the competition. Swedish Match has taken advantage of the many opportunities in other markets and can now focus on growth especially within the United States on their moist snuff and chewing tobacco brands.
Grand Strategy Clusters
Weakening Competitive Position
Turnaround
Concentrated Growth Retrenchment
Vertical Integration Merge with competitor
Horizontal Integration Liquidation
Divestment
Rapid Growth Slow Growth
(consumer satisfied reinforce (Redirect cash flow towards operations)
and hold)
Concentrated Growth Related Diversification
Vertical Integration Strategic Alliances
Concentrated growth
Vertical integration
Improving Competitive Position
Swedish Match should redirect its cash flows to focus on the moist snuff market within the U.S. Since the industry is in slow growth it can capitalize on this market segment and rival UST. The customer is never satisfied within the industry nor can a firm stand still because the result will be loss of customer and market share. As a result, Swedish Match needs to continue building their brand within the U.S. market and globally through concentrated growth. Horizontal Integration is very unlikely to occur within the industry because Swedish Match’s proposed merger with National Tobacco Company, LP was not allowed due to the impairment of competition. As Swedish Match has done in the past related diversification can be an option. Moving into the nicotine replacement therapy market can show possibilities. As an example, in 2001, Swedish Match made an alliance with Burkitt DDB to help design and produce a new nicotine chewing gum. Swedish Match’s emphasis on strategic alliances will prove to be beneficial so that the company can move in many directions strengthening its position globally and within the U.S. Finally, unrelated diversification goes against the firm’s strategy and positioning as a leader in the smokeless tobacco industry and the other tobacco products industry.
Grand Strategy Selection Matrix
(Investment)
Weakness
Turnaround Strategic Alliance
Retrenchment Merge with competition
Divestiture Unrelated Diversification
Liquidation
Internal External
Development (commitment to current (expand base of operations) Development
business solidify position)
Vertical Integration
Joint Venture
Concentrated Growth Related Diversification
Innovation Horizontal Integration
Strategic Alliance
Strength
Swedish Match needs to focus internally on its strengths so that they continue to grow and develop. After a host of acquisitions, which Swedish Match just went through, they must coordinate all their functions to facilitate their brand building both globally and in the U.S. Through innovation they can continue to differentiate their products and provide for customers needs. As a result of the innovations Swedish Match can cut into UST market share and maintain its global position.
BCG Matrix
|
Problem Child Lighters |
Star Chewing tobacco, cigars |
|
Dog
|
Cow Snuff, matches, |
Recommendations
Corporate Level Strategy - Swedish Match must continue to expand its products into emerging markets as they have done in the past. Growth opportunities exist in Asia and Latin America. The early expansion into these new markets has allowed them to capture market share early on in the market’s growth and can only persist. The firm must continue to focus on the American market because it provides the greatest opportunity in increasing profits and is the largest user of smokeless tobacco products in the world. The other tobacco products market and the smokeless tobacco industry must remain Swedish Match’s main focus. It is through this positioning that they have put themselves at the head of the field. Through concentrated growth, related diversification, and innovation Swedish Match can create more brand awareness making it a dominant player in new markets and furthering its position in current markets.
Business Level Strategy – Swedish Match must focus on their core competencies that have evolved as a result of their multiple acquisitions. Swedish Match must focus on a differentiation strategy to distinguish itself from its competitors. Being in a market with such tight competition the only way to get ahead is by creating brand awareness through product innovation and quality. Through Swedish Match’s Gothiatek standard they maintain a high quality differentiated product that is easily accessible due to Swedish Match’s vast distribution network. Swedish Match is already number one in snuff in South Africa and the Nordic countries. They must focus on the growing moist snuff market in the United States which is tightly held by UST. The only way Swedish Match can begin competing in this segment is to focus internally by building on the knowledge and capabilities they have. A continued focus on product development and innovation can lead to greater brand awareness in the snuff market that could in turn bring about new sales from that of the competition.
VII. Managerial Implications
Implementation Issues – Upper level management must put forth an effort to strengthen there position in moist snuff within the U.S. market. Management needs to acquire more firms to continuing expanding its distribution channels to better market its brands. This can easily be accomplished if we were to look at Swedish Match’s financials. Swedish Match is still able to take on more debt and has a very steady revenue stream. Swedish Match must facilitate some form of an intranet so as to create improved communication across the various functions of the organization. This will enable Swedish Match to adjust its direction and respond to customers needs. It is also imperative that Swedish Match maintain the caliber of employees and upper level management that is has obtained over the years. The human resource function will prove to increase the scope and range of Swedish Match. It is through the personnel and experience that comes along with them that has brought Swedish Match into the position they are in today. To maintain Swedish Match’s global position management must divest all of its operations that take away from its strategic focus and can in turn use this money towards research and development and marketing their brand name. Finally, for Swedish Match to expand its market share in the United States management must make a strong effort in distinguishing its brand from the competition. They can use the knowledge that is received through their global operations and focus it towards U.S. expansion.
VIII. References
Swedish
Match
Swisher
Conwood
UST
National
Lighters
Pipe Tobacco
Matches
Pipe Tobacco
Cigars
Matches
Cigars
Pipe Tobacco
Lighters
Corporate and Legal Affairs
Bo Aulin
CFO and Executive Vice President
Sven Hindrikes
Senior Advisor
Massimo Rossi
CEO and President
Lennart Sunden
Matches
Pipe Tobacco
Snuff
Cigars
Chewing Tobacco
Snuff
Snus
North Europe
Stefan Gelkner
Continental Europe
Peter Nilssom
North America
Lennart Freeman
Overseas
Ingemar Olson
Match Division
Graham Jones
FINANCE
ACCOUNTING
COMMUNICATIONS
HUMAN RESOURCES
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
High
Market Growth
Low
Market Share
High
Low
� Business and Company Resource Center. “Swedish Match AB History”
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.swedishmatch.com" ��www.swedishmatch.com� “Organization”
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.swedishmatch.com" ��www.swedishmatch.com� “Snuff”
� Swedish Match AB, Annual Report to Shareholders 2001.
� Business Source Premier. Data Monitor “Company Profile/History”
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.swedishmatch.com" ��www.swedishmatch.com� “Strategy”
� Ibid
� “Chewing and Smoking Tobacco and Snuff.” Encyclopedia of American Industries. Online Edition. Gale. Reproduced in Business and Company Resource Center.
� “What Price Glory?” Tobacco Retailer Vol. 3 (2000): 16
� “Chewing and Smoking Tobacco and Snuff.” Encyclopedia of American Industries. Online Edition. Gale. Reproduced in Business and Company Resource Center.
� “Smokeless Tobacco: Chewing on a Deal.” Retail Merchandiser Vol.41 (2001)
� Bierne. Mike. “Dipping into new product pipeline, ailing UST turns to flavored snuff.” Brandweek. 20 Nov.2000: Vol. 41 p5.
� “What Price Glory?” Tobacco Retailer Vol. 3 (2000): 16
� Fairclough, Gordon. “UST is hoping smokers switch to snuff packets.” Wall Street Journal 22 Jan. 2001
� Morse, Robert. “If You Can't Smoke In the Office, Snuff Can Be a Secret Vice.” Wall Street Journal 11 Feb. 2000 A1+
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.oralcancerfoundation.com" ��www.oralcancerfoundation.com� “Higher quantity use by young adults”
� Ibid
� Arnold, Matthew. “The changing habits of tobacco firms” Marketing(UK) May 2001: 20+
�David, Fred R. Strategic Management Cases New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003.
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.tobaccofreekids.org" ��www.tobaccofreekids.org� “Increase in Taxes Leads to Greater Switch to Smokeless Tobacco”
� St. James Press. "International Directory of Company Histories, UST Inc." 2003. Business and Company Resource Center. 22 Feb. 2004
� Cross, Dennis. “Report from the Snuff Wars.” Newsweek Fall 2002
� Fairclough, Gordon. “UST is hoping smokers switch to snuff packets.” Wall Street Journal 22 Jan. 2001
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.swedishmatch.com" ��www.swedishmatch.com� “Organization”
� www.tobaccofreekids.org
� Parker Pope, Tara. “Kicking the Habit” Wall Street Journal Online. 2 July 2002
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.ustinc.com" ��www.ustinc.com� “Socially acceptable option to smoking”
� Christoffersen, John. “Greenwich Company introduces spitless smokeless tobacco.” BC Cycle 1Aug. 1 2001Lexis Nexis.
� David, Fred R. Strategic Management Cases New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003.
� Bierne. Mike. “Dipping into new product pipeline, ailing UST turns to flavored snuff.” Brandweek. 20 Nov.2000: Vol. 41 p5.
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.ojibwas.com" ��www.ojibwas.com�; � HYPERLINK "http://www.senecasmokes.com" ��www.senecasmokes.com�.
� Deak J. “Most of the expansion for smokeless products will be outside the U.S.” Connecticut Post March 2002
� Parker Pope, Tara. “Kicking the Habit” Wall Street Journal Online. 2 July 2002
� “Trying to Sell Europe on Snuff…And Gearing up to Host an EC Bash.” Business Week 10 April 2001: 4
� www.swedishmatch.com
� St. James Press. "International Directory of Company Histories." UST Inc.. 2003. Business and Company Resource Center. 22 Feb. 2004
� David, Fred R. Strategic Management Cases New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003.
�Arnold, Matthew. “The changing habits of tobacco firms” Marketing(UK) May 2001: 20+
�Kleinman, Mark. “Nicotine gum in [pound] 10m UK launch ads” Marketing 10 May 2001.
� David, Fred R. Strategic Management Cases New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003.
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.ustinc.com" ��www.ustinc.com�
� Ibid
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.swedishmatch.com" ��www.swedishmatch.com� “Strategy”
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.ustinc.com" ��www.ustinc.com�
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.swedishmatch.com" ��www.swedishmatch.com�
� Swedish Match AB, Annual Report 1999 p.31
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.swedishmatch.com" ��www.swedishmatch.com� “Values”
� Swedish Match AB, Annual Report 2001 p.60
� Ibid
� Ibid
� Ibid
� Swedish Match Corp. Strategy, p.1-3.
� “Striking it Big.” Tobacco Reporter Nov. 2001
� Swedish Match Corp. TEMO.
� Witt, Joanna. “Swedish Match aims at student market.” Marketing. 31 Aug. 2000: p.8. Pro Quest Research Database. Marist College Library, Poughkeepsie, NY.
� Swedish Match Corp. Strategy, p.1-3.
� “Striking it Big.” Tobacco Reporter Nov. 2001
� “Acquisition in Italy.” World Tobacco July 2001: 6
� Swedish Match AB, Annual Report 2001
� Ibid
� “Striking it Big.” Tobacco Reporter Nov. 2001
� � HYPERLINK "http://www.thomsonfinancials.com" ��www.thomsonfinancials.com�; � HYPERLINK "http://www.yahoo.com" ��www.yahoo.com� “Currency Converter.”
� Swedish Match Corp. TEMO.
� “Court Blocks Tobacco Merger.” FTC: WATCH. 18 Dec. 2000: 3
� Kleinman, Mark. “Nicotine gum in [pound} 10m UK launch ads. Marketing 10 May 2001: 1