PICOT statement paper

profilechibaby
SusanPICOTQuestionandLiteraturereviewresearchArticleNRS433.docx

Literature Evaluation Table

STUDENT NAME: Name

SUMMARY OF CLINICAL ISSUE (200 – 250 words)

Hand Hygiene is one action that is most effective in reducing infections associated with healthcare such as Hospital Acquired Infections (HAIs). It is therefore a key activity for health care workers. Poor hand hygiene is detrimental to the health and safety of a patient and cause them to acquire more diseases to the detriment of their health, in addition to the one that brought them to the hospital. In fact, health workers have been revealed to be the chief carriers of hospital acquired infections. As revealed by many studies carried out to ascertain the adherence to hand hygiene and its effectiveness, a greater number of health workers fail to consistently adhere to hand hygiene practices. Apart from the international standard guidelines for hand hygiene, most health works fail to carry out common hand hygiene practices before and after contact with a patient. It has resulted in high morbidity and mortality cases caused by poor hand hygiene of health workers. There is need for more sensitization of health workers on the need for effective hand hygiene practices for quality healthcare. It is also important to know that the basic method used for hand hygiene like the entry and exit methods are insufficient. Healthcare institutions need to see it as their duty to introduce and foster various hand hygiene techniques for their hospitals for quality healthcare and patient safety, in addition to the guidelines of relevant international bodies such as World Health Organization.

PICOT Question: Does improvement in hand hygiene among healthcare workers lower the rate hospital-associated infections?

Criteria

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink

Lehotsky, A., Szilagyi, L. , Szeremy, P., Weber, G., Haidegger, T. (2017). Towards objective hand hygiene technique assessment: validation of the ultraviolet-dye-based hand-rubbing quality assessment procedure.

Journal of Hospital infection 97 (2017) 26-29

Permalink: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28579470

Garus-Pakowska, A., Sobala, W., Szatko. F. (2013). Observance of hand washing procedures performed by the medical personnel before patient contact part 1 Retrieved from international journal of occupational medicine and environmental health 2013

Permalink:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23715929

Sadule-Rios, N., Aguilera, G. (2017). Nurses’ perception of reasons for persistent low rates in hand hygiene compliance. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 42 (2017) 17-21

Permalink:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28366521

How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?

The article validates hand hygiene quality assessment technique, which consequently improves the hand hygiene rates.

The study in this article was carried out to ascertain the effectiveness of health workers’ hand hygiene before they make contact with patient.

The article explains nurses’ view on the reasons for low hand hygiene compliance rates. This helps to improve hand hygiene compliance.

Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)

Qualitative: The study validates the quality of a hand hygiene assessment technique

Quantitative: Health workers and hand hygiene data was collected and observed for the study.

Quantitative: The study quantified opinions of critical care nurses.

Purpose Statement

Microbiological validation of the ultraviolet-dye-based hand-rubbing quality assessment procedure

Effectiveness of health workers’ hand hygiene before they make contact with patients

To explore nurses’ perceptions of reasons for persistent low rates in hand hygiene compliance in the Critical Care Unit and their recommendations for improvement

Research Question

How microbiologically effective is ultra-violet-dye-based hand-rubbing technique on hand hygiene quality assessment?

Does hand hygiene among health workers lower the rate of hospital acquired infections?

(1) What are nurses’ perceptions of the reasons for the persistent low rating in hand hygiene compliance in the critical care unit?

(2) What are nurses’ suggestions to improve hand hygiene compliance in the critical care unit?

Outcome

Ultraviolet-dye-based hand-rubbing hand hygiene quality assessment technique is effective with 95.05% sensitivity and 98.01% specificity

Hand hygiene compliance level among health workers before patient contact appears to be greatly and shockingly below the expectations

51% chose high workload and under- staffing as the main reason for scoring low-ranking in hand hygiene compliance, 47% chose difficulty donning gloves when hands are damp and difficulty accessing sink locations, 43% chose products placed in inconvenient locations (item # 4) as the third main reason for low-ranking in hand hygiene compliance among critical care nurses. 38% chose Skin irritation. Finally 36% selected lack of appropriate hand hygiene products available at the point of care

Setting

(Where did the study take place?)

Institute of Medical Microbiology, Sem- melweis University (Budapest, Hungary)

Data collection and observation was carried out in three selected hospitals.

A 452 beds Magnet hospital

Sample

25 Artificial hand models

Health workers, including nurses, doctors and other medical staff of not less than 180.

47 critical care nurses

Method

Systematic qualitative research

Hand hygiene observed for over 1500 hours

Exploratory, descriptive survey design

Key Findings of the Study

UV-dye based hand hygiene assessment method is a true and reliable indicator of correctly disinfected and pathogen-free areas on the hand surface

Hand hygiene compliance level among health workers before patient contact appears to be greatly and shockingly below the expectations.

High workload and understaffing are the most important barriers to hand hygiene compliance

Recommendations of the Researcher

Infection prevention experts to continue assessing the performance of their staff the UV-dyed based method.

Following the WHO and CDC guidelines health workers should as a matter of obligation disinfect their hands before contact with each patient

Having the adequate nurse-patient ratios and consequently, more time, cleanser products available at the point of care, and easy accessible sink locations for hand hygiene.

Criteria

Article 4

Article 5

Article 6

APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink

Chatfield, S. L., Nolan, R., Crawford, H. and Hallam, J. S., (2016). Experiences of hand hygiene among acute care nurses: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. SAGE Open Medicine Volume 4: 1 –9

Permalink:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27803809

McLawsa, M. L., Farahangizb, S.,

Palenikc, C. Askariand, M., (2014). Iranian healthcare workers’ perspective on hand hygiene: A qualitative study. Journal of Infection and Public Health (2015) 8, 72—79

Permalink:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24997855

Deochand, N., & Deochand, M. E. (2016). Brief Report on Hand-Hygiene Monitoring Systems: A Pilot Study of a Computer-Assisted Image Analysis Technique. Journal of environmental health78(10).

How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?

This article explains the potential of improvement in hand hygiene among acute care nurses to reduce incidence of healthcare-associated infections

This article explains the view of health workers on various aspects of hand hygiene, and proposed improvement ways.

This article explains the results of Computer-Assisted Image Analysis Technique, for hand hygiene.

Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)

Qualitative: It analyzed the quality of opinion of nurses using non-numerical data.

Qualitative: the study evaluated the different aspects of hand hygiene.

Qualitative: The study uses data collected from the image analysis

Purpose Statement

To identify the potential of improvement in hand hygiene among acute care nurses to reduce incidence of healthcare-associated infections

To assess various aspects of hand hygiene from the perspective of health workers in Iran.

To discover better and cost effective hand hygiene techniques that were more accurate and less intrusive.

Research Question

Does improvement in hand hygiene among acute care nurses have the potential to reduce incidence of healthcare-associated infections?

What are health workers opinion regarding various aspects of hand hygiene?

Does Image Analysis Techniques improve on hand hygiene

Outcome

Three themes practical hygiene, risky business, and hygiene on trial were developed and were supported by 50% of participants.

Three themes emerged from the thematic analysis including: ‘‘the relationship between personal factors and HH compliance,’’ ‘‘the relationship between environmental factors and HH compliance’’ and ‘‘the impact of the health system on HH adherence

Computer Assisted Image analysis is more effective than observation and some other traditional techniques.

Setting

(Where did the study take place?)

Unite States

A public teaching hospital and 1 private hospital in Shiraz, Iran

Western Michigan University, Michigan.

Sample

Eight nurses who were employed in various patient-care roles

80 Health Care Workers; 16 intensive care unit (ICU) nurses, 14 surgical ward nurses, 24 support staff, 6 attending physicians, 20 medical students (interns working in ICUs and surgical wards) and 6 nursing students.

2 samples

Method

Qualitative interview review and interpretative phenomenological analysis

A purposive sampling method driven by the objectives of the study.

Quantitative research method

Key Findings of the Study

Three super-ordinate themes; practical hygiene, risky business, and hygiene on trial developed using quality control recommendations associated with IPA were supported by 50% of the sample.

Several factors play significant role in improving health workers’ hand hygiene compliance, such as the regular adherence to health system tenets. Hand hygiene compliance may also be improved through application of realistic policies and better supervision. In addition, appropriate education may positively affect hand hygiene behavior and attitudes.

Glow germs could be effectively removed in 5 seconds.

Less glow germs were still found in subject who used soap in hand washing

Recommendations of the Researcher

Researchers and infection prevention practitioners might consider soliciting greater input from nurses in planning hand hygiene improvement interventions.

Moe realistic hand hygiene policies should be put in place and appropriate education should be ensured to improve hand hygiene compliance

Hand image analysis can be used to improve on hand hygiene techniques as it provides effective feedback on hand hygiene.

References

Garus-Pakowska, A., Sobala, W., Szatko. F. (2013). Observance of hand washing procedures performed by the medical personnel before patient contact part 1.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health 2013

Chatfield, S. L., Nolan, R., Crawford, H. and Hallam, J. S., (2016). Experiences of hand hygiene among acute care nurses: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. SAGE Open Medicine Volume 4: 1 –9

Deochand, N., & Deochand, M. E. (2016). Brief Report on Hand-Hygiene Monitoring Systems: A Pilot Study of a Computer-Assisted Image Analysis Technique. Journal of environmental health78(10). Journal of Hospital infection 97 (2017) 26-29

Lehotsky, A., Szilagyi, L. , Szeremy, P., Weber, G., Haidegger, T. (2017). Towards objective hand hygiene technique assessment: validation of the ultraviolet-dye-based hand-rubbing quality assessment procedure.

McLawsa, M. L., Farahangizb, S., Palenikc, C. Askariand, M., (2014). Iranian healthcare workers’ perspective on hand hygiene: A qualitative study. Journal of Infection and Public Health (2015) 8, 72—79

Sadule-Rios, N., Aguilera, G. (2017). Nurses’ perception of reasons for persistent low rates in hand hygiene compliance. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 42 (2017) 17-21

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.