PLEC week 13 FP

Surveillance State Research

Briger, S. & Kelley, S. (2021). Facial Recognition And Beyond: Journalist Ventures Inside

China's 'Surveillance State'. Retrieved 5 January 2021 from

ventures-inside-chinas-surveillance-sta" https://www.npr.org/2021/01/05/953515627/facial-recognition-and-beyond-journalist

ventures-inside-chinas-surveillance-sta .

China has had rising cases of state surveillance using facial recognition and security cameras. The system has a high capacity of scanning faces in a very short time. The action has been criticized by other nations since it imposes control on the public. The communist government of China uses surveillance to maintain order using their own constraints. Many citizens have gotten punished for little mistakes due to surveillance.

The surveillance state at China has been negative and requires transformation. The fact that people get punished for minor offences is not positive. Democracy should get maintained so that citizens live freely. The development of apps such as WeChat created more power for government to monitor citizens. As such, surveillance should not get limited and only acquire information that citizens allow to get recorded.

Eck, K. & Hatz, S. (2020). State surveillance and the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Human

Rights, 19, (5). 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2020.1816163 .

Surveillance state has been made evident during the Covid-19 pandemic. Governments have adopted technological means of monitoring citizens in order to limit spread of the virus. The article states that governments monitor citizens to ensure abidance to laws. The crisis that occurred due to the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in more implementation of state surveillance. The main reason was to ensure limited disease outbreak and panic.

The fact that governments and health institutions launched surveillance techniques results in the technique’s study. Surveillance has provided collection of many types of data from people. Data collection is a critical process that requires experts to handle the data. Misinformation is common since access of data is possible on many platforms. In this regard, governments should implement access control and security of data collected during surveillance.

Fou, A. (2020). Everything Is Listening—We Already Live in A Surveillance State, We Just

Don’t Know It. Retrieved 5 January 2021 from

live-in-a-surveillance-state-we-just-dont-know-it/?sh=7502cb8c3635" https://www.forbes.com/sites/augustinefou/2020/09/01/everything-is-listeningwe-already

live-in-a-surveillance-state-we-just-dont-know-it/?sh=7502cb8c3635 .

The article focuses on how the current digitized environment has hardware and technical components can “listen” to human beings. The author explains that use of the IoT devices puts people at a higher risk of getting exposed to technical means of surveillance. Televisions have also been discovered to be listening in on conversations. Mobile Phones also listen to conversations. This causes majority of advertisements suitable to users’ desires. The article explains that surveillance is detrimental to privacy.

The article is effective since many individuals provide personal data to technical components. Mobile phones, laptops, online accounts, and websites all ask for personal information. Devices that people use also have microphones that listen to conversations. Surveillance techniques hijack personal data and use it for business activities. The actions are detrimental especially when the information gets leaked to third-parties.

Maier, K. (2020). The Surveillance State Is a Reality. Retrieved 5 January 2021 from

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2020-06-26/the-surveillance-state-is-a-reality .

The article states that surveillance has already gotten established in the current digital environment. Proof exists due to the tracing apps implemented during the Covid-19 pandemic. Although surveillance has identified individuals, there are negative outcomes. Surveillance has been inaccurate when assessing persons of color in police investigations. Human rights groups have advocated for limited surveillance.

The existence of surveillance states has been positive when dealing with disease management. The technique becomes detrimental when the police apply dangerous techniques. Assessment of criminals should always get done with accurate surveillance. Digital surveillance also gets applied by government to monitor other countries. The technique is negative and affects international ties.

Lemiuex, P. (2018). Why the Surveillance State is Dangerous. Retrieved 5 January 2021

From https://www.econlib.org/archives/2018/06/why_the_surveil.html .

The fact the current environment conducts surveillance of the public does not seem dangerous to some persons. The article states that some surveillance techniques only assess the public. They are not always used to produce negative outcomes. The article states that surveillance is conducted through storage of public information like fingerprints, ID cards, and videos. Surveillance is detrimental because it offers the possibility of control.

The is issue of surveillance is common in various countries. Issues have been more common as innovative methods of communication get developed. The government often has the power to use surveillance techniques to create policies suitable to citizens. It is detrimental for the government to posses so much information about the public. Surveillance can introduce new laws that may not seem effective for citizens.