Chapter 15 Discussions

profiletigers2019_
supreme-court-upholds-daca-in-blow-to-trump-administration.html
Home>Government homework help>Chapter 15 Discussions
Accessibility links Close Navigation Menu Supreme Court Upholds DACA, Ruling Against Trump Administration The decision is a dramatic victory for immigration advocates and gives a new lease on life for the so-called DREAMers, immigrants who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children. NPR logo
Supreme Court Rules For DREAMers, Against Trump
Listen · 4:49 4:49 Toggle more options
  • Download
  • Embed Embed <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/829858289/881646491" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
Supreme Court Rules For DREAMers, Against Trump 4:49

Law

Supreme Court Rules For DREAMers, Against Trump

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • Email
June 18, 202010:12 AM ET Nina Totenberg at NPR headquarters in Washington, D.C., May 21, 2019. (photo by Allison Shelley)

Nina Totenberg

Facebook Twitter Enlarge this image

Activists demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Thursday as the court rejected the Trump administration's move to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images

Activists demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Thursday as the court rejected the Trump administration's move to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images

Updated at 6:35 p.m. ET

Supreme Court Rules For DREAMers, Against Trump
Listen · 4:49 4:49 Toggle more options
  • Download
  • Embed Embed <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/829858289/881646491" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">

In a major rebuke to President Trump, the U.S. Supreme Court has blocked the administration's plan to dismantle an Obama-era program that has protected 700,000 so-called DREAMers from deportation. The vote was 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing the opinion.

Under the Obama program, qualified individuals brought to the U.S. as children were given temporary legal status if they graduated from high school or were honorably discharged from the military, and if they passed a background check. Just months after taking office, Trump moved to revoke the program, only to be blocked by lower courts — and now the Supreme Court.

Roberts' opinion for the court was a narrow but powerful rejection of the way the Trump administration went about trying to abolish the program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA.

"We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies," Roberts wrote. "The wisdom of those decisions is none of our concern. Here we address only whether the Administration complied with the procedural requirements in the law that insist on 'a reasoned explanation for its action.' "

The Original DREAMer Recalls 'All Pervasive' Fear As An Undocumented Child

National

The Original DREAMer Recalls 'All Pervasive' Fear As An Undocumented Child

National

The Original 'Dreamer' Comments On Supreme Court's DACA Decision

The Original 'Dreamer' Comments On Supreme Court's DACA Decision
Listen · 5:22 5:22 Toggle more options
  • Download
  • Embed Embed <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/880513704/880513705" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

In 2017, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions simply declared DACA illegal and unconstitutional. "Such an open-ended circumvention of immigration laws was an unconstitutional exercise of authority by the executive branch," he said at the time. Sessions argued that the program should be rescinded because he said it was unlawful from the start.

But, as Roberts observed, the attorney general offered no detailed justifications for canceling DACA. Nor did the acting secretary of homeland security at the time, Elaine Duke, who put out a memo announcing the rescission of DACA that relied entirely on Sessions' opinion that the program was unlawful.

As Roberts noted, Duke's memo didn't address the fact that thousands of young people had come to rely on the program, emerging from the shadows to enroll in degree programs, embark on careers, start businesses, buy homes and even marry and have 200,000 children of their own who are U.S. citizens, not to mention that DACA recipients pay $60 billion in taxes each year.