supply chain- BA Level 2400 words
Running Head: SUPPLY CHAIN OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Supply Chain Operations Management
Student’s Name: Angeline Hibbert
As a report this needs to have subheadings for each of the sections; a good approach is to have similar sections to the assessment brief. Your work requires more in-text citations. This is good academic practice. Please note that a high product variety that needs customisation requires a strategy that is flexible, fast and responsive- take the hint.
A lean supply chain is an older method that greatly focusses on producing more and in a reduced cost. This therefore adds value for their customers and eliminates any wastage on valueless things. Its focus is on forecasting where they pre-plan years or months before production to reduce on cost especially where a large amount of goods is produced. Agile supply method on the other hand gives a high receptiveness to being flexible so as to adapt quickly to changing circumstances in the society. It handles market unpredictability by waiting to see how the market reacts, before they have finished with the production process therefore responding directly to product demand rather than depending on a forecast (Limm, n.d.). Company A is suited to both agile and lean supply strategies. It can be suited to the agile strategy because different customers have different tastes and preferences when it comes to product specifications. They may make more hinges and iron products which may end up not being bought by their customers. Rethink this argument. See my comment above. They may require customizing and they respond quickly to market changes and trends. Through the lean strategy, they can make the products earlier, taking into consideration the current trends in the market. This will enable them to serve customers who may require the products urgently. These are customers who may not have various specifications for the products and may take what is readily available in the market. It will also serve the inconsistent number of orders which they receive from their customers. For company B, they have to cut on inventory costs by reducing on what is produced because they have a consistent order size. To reduce accumulation of products, they should produce what their customer demands, rather than forecasting what their customers will demand but it ends up accumulating in the stores. Therefore, agile supply chain method will be better suited for company B.
Some organizations may prefer the lean method because it highly cuts on the cost of production and minimizes wastage of the already produced products. It is able to minimize wastage because it can eliminate outdated inventories and possibly reduce the operational costs involved I the production process. It also provides for a timely delivery of products to customers and at the place where they want them and hence, they are able to meet customer requirements without having to observe a strict time limit which leads to an improved customer relationship. The flow of the products from the manufacturers to the consumers is made continuous and this ensures that there is no wastage of operational space which leads to a better production efficiency. Predicting how the market will be helps in preparing the processes which will be involved in the processing stage and they are therefore able to avoid any errors which may occur in the future (Shpak, 2018). Despite its advantages, lean method also has shortcomings which may override the advantages. There may be equipment or labor failures because change may result to fear and stress leading to loss of the optimized advantage. Though it delivers products in the right quantity, sometime there may be an error in deliveries or missed deliveries which may be caused by traffic congestion in some areas. The implementation cost involved is very high because it involves purchasing of the required machinery, training employees on the use of these machines and employing managers who are familiar with the method. Is this not the case for any manufacturing strategy? Agile manufacturing may currently be the best considered method of production. This is because it focusses more on customer needs and product design and thus, it produces goods which take into consideration changing demands. The manufacturing companies are able to quickly respond to change since they retain some mass production features and remain flexible while still doing mass customization. There is a tendency to accept uncertainty faster which leads to them solving a problem faster since it gives priority to experimentation in order to clear the uncertainty before bringing a strategy to implementation. Please provide a source for this. It is not academically sound. Also, it can be operated with a low inventory in that they produce what is demanded, thus reducing on product spoilage or being outdated. The method also has various shortcomings like lack of predictability in its approach because only what is required to lead into the next level of business is executed. Greater success in any organization is achievable through beforehand advance planning. Lack of adoption to change is another shortcoming where the employees may lack the dedication towards giving the method priority in the organization and making it work. It may be difficult to measure difficulties since tracking of progress in the agile method is difficult because of unclear resource planning. Also, lack of formal personnel training on processes involved and tools may lead to overlooking problems and develop bad habits that may result into a blame game and result into a poor output since the goods are produced at a much faster pace and at times with little knowledge. Source?
Spotify is a company that successfully implemented the agile strategy. The engineering team came up with rules and created their own rules in regards to their company culture. The first thing they did was to replace the terms scrum masters and teams as used in agile methodology with the terms agile coach and squads (Eriksson, 2015). Each individual had responsibility for what they did and had the freedom to decide what they were going to do and how. The squads were then allowed to work in an environment which encouraged team work and sharing of ideas during meetings. These squads were given a say in making and acting according to the laid down decisions and came up with a high alignment and autonomy where the different squads could agree on a common challenge and came up with the best solutions. The different squads were allowed to experiment with whichever agile method they wanted and when any squad identified a properly functioning system, the other squads had to implement it for a period of time. The employees showed great level of respect towards each other and praised each other for the accomplished achievements which maintained a positive atmosphere and they were constantly pushed towards improving the work processes and the environment. People in the squads were allowed to move into other squads with lesser inconvenience to other squad members. These squads formed a community which related closely with each other and the leaders took upon duties such as being coaches and mentors. Lastly, the organization had a belief that they should keep coming up with new versions of their product and so the squad was continuously working to add new features to the already existing product. From the implementation of agile supply chain, Spotify has around sixty million users worldwide and were able to expand to fifty eight different countries and at the same time, are able to compete favorably with the main competitors in the music industry. They were able to recruit talented people who were in turn involved in continuous product development. The Spotify team is highly motivated to bring new developments and they are always encouraged ton aim higher. They also were able to keep up with rising market trends and this enabled them to get more users. From the squads, Spotify is able to deliver a working and tested application where they continuously work on it to ensure that it is convenient to the user. Through working with the small squads, they realized how much productive these groups were and they therefore took advantage of each individual’s skills and ability to mentor others in the squads. This worked best since unnecessary competition was reduced and the squads became more cohesive. There is also a continuous planning which is carried out by the organization to ensure that the software application is successful and effective as well as having the appropriate data. Through the timely planning, they have been able to continuously test and deliver quality services which they are testing continuously so as it remains relevant to their customers.
Reference
Limm, M. (n.d.). The Difference Between Agile vs. Lean Supply Chain Management. Retrieved from: https://blog.procurify.com/2014/04/22/agile-lean-supply-chain-management/.
Wood, L.J. (26 September 2017). Disadvantages of Lean Manufacturing. Retrieved from: https://bizfluent.com/list-6025715-disadvantages-lean-manufacturing.html.
Shpak, S. (27 June 2018). Advantages & Disadvantages of Lean Production. Retrieved from: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-amp-disadvantages-lean-production-46696.html
Gilley, C. (12 March 2015). The Pros and Cons of Agile Product Development. Retrieved from: https://community.uservoice.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-agile-product-development/
The Core 5 Principles for Implementing Lean. Retrieved from: https://kanbanize.com/lean-management/implementing-lean/
MacKay, J. (January 11 2018). The Ultimate Guide to Implementing Agile Project Management (and Scrum). Retrieved from: https://plan.io/blog/ultimate-guide-to-implementing-agile-project-management-and-scrum/
Eriksson, U. (31 March 2015). How Spotify does agile – A look at the Spotify engineering culture. Retrieved from: https://reqtest.com/agile-blog/how-spotify-does-agile-a-look-at-the-spotify-engineering-culture/