PEER SUPPORT RESEARCH

profilemixhael.daaha
SummerPeerSupportResearchandPresentation31.pdf

ELSE 6073 Educational Procedures for Moderate to Profound Disabilities Summer Peer Support Research / Presentation – 100 pts.

Overview: There are numerous strategies for promoting social relationships and encouraging school participation for student learners without disabilities. However, when it comes to fostering friendships, social relationships and school participation in students with a severe disability, professionals must be resourceful and intentional in finding research to support and promote these kinds of relationships.

As a graduate candidate in the special education program, you are expected to learn to draw logical connections from research to practice and to learn to select appropriate evidenced based or research-based practices or programs to meet identified student needs. In this project, candidates will write a 3.5 - 5 page paper based on current literature that addresses proven strategies and techniques used to promote social competence and development of peer relationships for those students who have been identified with moderate to severe disabilities. YouTube Video Presentation of his/her Research. Video is available for the instructor to view. Video should include:

• Introduction • Statement of purpose • Summary of literature • Impact on student learning • Anecdotal thoughts for future

The following guidelines should be observed to ensure a successful final product. ➢ Paper should adhere to the Learning Outcomes provided in Chapter 11 of our text; thus

the following should be addressed within your paper: o Importance of peer relationships in the learning and lives of students with severe

disabilities. o Types of relationships and interactions that might be fostered with peers. o Relationship of students with severe disabilities when social-focused interventions are not in place. o Approaches for assessing social needs. o Key elements necessary for friendships and durable relationships. o Evidence-based approaches for supporting relationships (identify at least 2)

➢ Search the scholar literature for research studies on interventions or instructional methods that are designed to address social competence and peer relationships. Explore resources in A-State’s online library (i.e., professional journals, articles, etc.) Use peer-refereed research studies. You may also use other scholarly sources (e.g., meta-analyses, literature reviews, and professional organization reviews of practices such as CEC). ➢ Justification: Identify and synthesize at least two primary research studies that have

shown positive effects for possible instructional approaches/methods with students whose characteristics and needs are similar to the student’s we serve in Moderate Profound settings. These studies should come from scholarly journals that involve a peer-review process for publication.

➢ Use APA style must be used in writing your paper: formatting, in-text citations, and reference list must be used along with a title page, and running head.

© 2018 Arkansas State University Page 1 of 4

Rubric Peer Support Research Plan and Video –100 points

Tasks Exemplary Acceptable Unacceptable

Learning Outcomes Candidate considers and discusses each of the six learning outcomes as listed within the guidelines and is able to draw logical connections from research to practice and discuss each learning outcome as it relates to promoting social competence and developing peer relationships amongst student learners identified with moderate-profou nd disabilities.

20 points

Candidate considers each of the six learning outcomes as listed within the guidelines and is able to draw some connections from research to practice and discuss most of the learning outcomes as they relate to promoting social competence and developing peer relationships amongst student learners identified with moderate-profou nd disabilities.

15 points

Candidate fails to consider and discuss each of the six learning outcomes as listed

within the guidelines And/or

Fails to draw logical connections from

research to practice. And/or

Candidate fails to discuss each learning outcome as it relates to promoting social competence and developing peer relationships amongst student learners identified with moderate-profou nd disabilities.

10 points

Justification for

Selected Literature

Candidate identifies and synthesizes at least two primary research studies that have shown positive effects for possible

Candidate identifies and synthesizes at least two primary research studies that have shown positive effects for possible instructional

Candidate identifies and synthesizes only one primary research study that has shown positive effects for possible instructional

instructional approaches/methods

approaches/methods approaches/method s with students whose

© 2018 Arkansas State University Page 2 of 4

with students whose characteristics and needs are similar those we serve under Moderate-Profoun d Disabilities. Candidate also identifies, summarizes, and correctly utilizes other scholarly sources to justify the selected instructional intervention (e.g., meta-analyses, literature reviews, professional organization reviews of practices), demonstrating a strong ability to interpret educational research and scholarly literature and make the research-to-practi ce connection.

20 points

with students whose characteristics and needs are similar to those learners identified with moderate-profou nd disabilities. Candidate shows an ability to interpret educational research and scholarly literature and use those to make decisions about practice.

15 points

characteristics and needs are similar to those learners identified with moderate –profound disabilities, or the articles selected do not represent educational research (e.g., a program description or practitioner article), or candidate shows a limited ability to interpret educational research and scholarly literature and use those to make decisions about practice.

10 points

Professional

Writing Skills

The paper is submitted in a format that is professional in appearance. APA Style for manuscript structure, clear and concise writing, mechanics of style, and crediting of sources are adhered to throughout the paper.

15 points

The final paper is submitted in a format that is professional in appearance. APA Style for manuscript structure, clear and concise writing, mechanics of style, and crediting of sources is adhered to throughout the paper, although minor errors may exist that do not interfere with communication of

The final paper is submitted in a format that is professional in appearance. APA Style for manuscript structure, clear and concise writing, mechanics of style, and crediting of sources is adhered to in portions of the paper, while other portions require significant editing so

© 2018 Arkansas State University Page 3 of 4

ideas (no more than 5 errors).

10 points

that communication of ideas is not impaired.

5 points

Video

Presentation/Reflection

Candidate creates and submits a YouTube Video Presentation of his/her Research. Video is available for instructor to view. Video includes:

• Introduction • Statement of

purpose • Summary of

literature • Impact on student

learning • Anecdotal

thoughts for future

35 points

Candidate creates and submits a YouTube Video Presentation of his/her Instructional Plan. Video includes 4 of the requested criteria as prescribed in the guidelines.

30 points

Video lacks 3 or more of the requested criteria as prescribed in the guidelines.

25 points OR

Candidate fails to create and submit a YouTube Video Presentation of his/her Instructional Plan.

0 points

Submission Graduate candidates submitted assignments on time.

10 points

Graduate candidate submitted project after deadline.

0 points

© 2018 Arkansas State University Page 4 of 4