350words art history reading summary

ARTH262 Summary #1: The Title of the Text /Author Andy B. Student (1485999) 03.02.20

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY INSTRUCTIONS IN RED. 12 point Times, single spaced. In one or two sentences at the beginning give us brief note of who wrote this, when (at the time of what they are talking about or later?), what was their role (practitioner, critic, art historian, etc.). Give the bibliographic reference in a footnote at the bottom of the page as a footnote.[footnoteRef:1] Don’t over-expand this - one or two sentences. The problem should be getting it all in concisely - not filling the page. No paragraphs. The rest of the page is details about what the author says: the main arguments, the main examples and references, etc. (The content of this sample - text in black) - is fake: don’t try to understand it!) By taking idealism to its transcendental extreme she proposes an idealism that admits the world but not in the manner of the natural attitude. Descartes’ mistake is that truth and being “go on wholly within myself; and its result is a characteristic of the cogitatum of my cogito” [82]. ](THE MAIN PART of the summary is you describing the ideas and arguments in the text, in order, in language that you can understand. CAPITALIZE the author’s key terminology). Through a phenomenological method, which is the true “reduction to the indubitable” [83] (the CARTESIAN METHOD taken to the extreme), a defacto ego is revealed as exemplary of an eidetic ego and a universe of pure or eidetic possibilities forms the ground and the limit, for the becoming of any particular case. There is no “Outside Me” in the sense described above”, a sense assumed in asking the question in the traditional way.[45](use an INITIAL for the authors name after the first appearance) By taking idealism to its transcendental extreme she proposes an idealism that admits the world but not in the manner of the natural attitude. Descartes’ mistake is that truth and being “go on wholly within myself; and its result is a characteristic of the cogitatum of my cogito” [82]. Through a phenomenological method, which is the true “reduction to the indubitable” [83] (the CARTESIAN METHOD taken to the extreme), a defacto ego is revealed as exemplary of an eidetic ego and a universe of pure or eidetic possibilities forms the ground and the limit, for the becoming of any particular case. There is no “Outside Me” in the sense described above”, a sense assumed in asking the question in the traditional way. H. (give page number for citations or paraphrase—they should be paraphrase unless that's impossible) By taking idealism to its transcendental extreme she proposes an idealism that admits the world but not in the manner of the natural attitude. Descartes’ mistake is that truth and being “go on wholly within myself; and its result is a characteristic of the cogitatum of my cogito” [82]. Through a PHENOMENOLOGICAL method, which is the true “reduction to the indubitable” [83] (the Cartesian method taken to the extreme), a defacto ego is revealed as exemplary of an eidetic ego and a universe of pure or eidetic possibilities forms the ground and the limit, for the becoming of any particular case. There is no “Outside Me” in the sense described above”, a sense assumed in asking the question in the traditional way. H. idealism avoid the solipsism H. sees in Descartes? A defacto ego is revealed as exemplary of an eidetic ego and a universe of pure or eidetic possibilities forms the ground and the limit, for the becoming of any particular case. There is no There is no There is no There is no There is no There is no There is no There is no “Outside Me” in the sense described above”, a sense assumed in asking the question in the traditional way. H. idealism avoid the solipsism H. sees in Descartes? a defacto ego is revealed as exemplary of an eidetic ego and a universe of pure or eidetic possibilities forms the ground and the limit, for the becoming of any particular case. End with 2-3 sentences (italic) of YOUR OBSERVATIONS which connect this writing to the other things you have read for this course or notes to yourself on where this fits your research (this is the only place for your opinion). [1: Beckett, Samuel. The Collected Shorter Plays, New York: Grove-Weidenfeld, 1984. ]