research summary
|
SAMPLE Summative Table Author, Year, Study Design, Class, Rating |
Study Purpose |
Study Population |
Intervention |
Outcomes |
Conclusions |
Limitations |
|
Uberos 2014, Retrospective cohort study, Class B, Rating: + (positive) |
To evaluate the effectiveness of vitamin A supplementation for the prevention of prematurity-related complications in VLBW infants |
Preterm infants (n=154) born <1500g or <32 weeks’ gestational age |
IM vitamin A 5000 IU, three times weekly during the first 28 days of life, compared to no supplementation |
No significant difference in BPD incidence, mechanical ventilation, days of CPAP, or mortality between groups Risk of sepsis was up to three times higher among the vitamin A group (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.6-8.7)
|
Universal administration of vitamin A to preterm infants is not justified (due to potential for sepsis risk with no benefit seen in this study), and supplementation should be reserved for ELBW infants with low serum vitamin A levels (<20 μg/dL) |
Sample size
|
|
Moreira 2012, Retrospective cohort study, Class B, Rating: ∅ (neutral) |
To determine if the continued use of vitamin A supplementation in a NICU is warranted, based on effects of supplementation on BPD incidence. |
Preterm infants (n=178) born <1000g |
Infants born between July 2004 and December 2005 (n=76) did not receive vitamin A supplementation. Infants born between January 2006 and June 2008 (n=102) received three weekly IM vitamin A doses for the first 28 days of life
|
Non-significant 11% reduction in BPD incidence with vitamin A supplementation (P = 0.2)
|
Vitamin A supplementation resulted in a non-significant trend toward reduced BPD incidence in preterm infants, warranting continued use and further trials with larger sample sizes to confirm statistical significance. |
Sample size Dose not indicated
|
Formulate PICO/PIO Question: "Among adults with type 2 diabetes, how does physical activity intervention effects maintenance of glucose".
Study 1: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737933/
Study 2: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5615594/
Study 3: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336125/
Summative Table:
|
Author, Year, Design, Class, Rating* |
Study Purpose |
Population |
Interventions |
Results |
Conclusions |
Strengths/ Limitations |
|
Study 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Study 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Study 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*According to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ Evidence Analysis Process
Conclusion Statement:
Discussion: