Literature review, first assignment (part 2)

1 EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ON STUDENTS

Effects of Digital Technology on Students

Samba Vineeth Kumar

Department of Computer Science, Monroe College, King Graduate School

22FL-KG604-155HY - Graduate Research & Critical Analysis

Prof. Manya Bouteneff

October 23, 2022

2 EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ON STUDENTS

1. Who conducted the research?

Ans). Chen, L., Nath, R., & Insley, R. (2014).

2. Why was the study completed (purpose / what researchers hoped to learn)?

Ans). This study shows a in class digital distraction seeks to identify factors that influence

students' in-class digital distraction from a cross-cultural perspective.

3. When was data collected (not the publication year)?

Ans). Data was collected during 2012 and 2013.

4. Where was data collected (physical location)?

Ans). Data was collected from university students in Africa, China, and the United States.

5. How was data collected (methodology)?

Ans). Mixed Methodology.

6. What were the findings?

Ans). The researchers found that the digital distraction of students is addiction level.

3 EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ON STUDENTS

Effects of Digital Technology on Students

1. Chen, L., Nath, R., & Insley, R. (2014). This study, shows a in class digital distraction

seeks to identify factors that influence students' in-class digital distraction from a cross-

cultural perspective. Data was collected during 2012 and 2013. Data was collected from

university students in Africa, China, and the United States. Data was collected by using

mixed methodology. The researchers found that the digital distraction of students is

addiction level.

4 EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ON STUDENTS

1. Who conducted the research?

Ans). Gano, L. R. (2011).

2. Why was the study completed (purpose / what researchers hoped to learn)?

Ans). The purpose of this study is to compare the academic achievement and effortness of

the students.

3. When was data collected (not the publication year)?

Ans). The data was collected in 2011.

4. Where was data collected (physical location)?

Ans). The data was collected in teaching College Algebra to twenty-one (21) tertiary students

of University of the East.

5. How was data collected (methodology)?

Ans). Mixed Methodology.

6. What were the findings?

Ans). Researcher found that there are possible effects on student's academic achievement.

5 EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ON STUDENTS

Effects of digital technology on students

2. Gano, L. R. (2011). The purpose of this study is to compare the academic achievement

and effortness of the students. The data was collected in 2011. The data was collected in

teaching college Algebra to twenty-one students of university of east. The data was

collected by using the mixed methodology. Researcher found that there are possible

effects on student's academic achievement.

6 EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ON STUDENTS

References

1. Chen, L., Nath, R., & Insley, R. (2014). Determinants of digital distraction: A cross-

cultural investigation of users in africa, china and the U.S. Journal of International

Technology and Information Management, 23(3), 145-V. Retrieved from

https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/determinants-digital-distraction-cross-

cultural/docview/1757276125/se-2.

2. Gano, L. R. (2011). Fitting technology to the mathematics pedagogy: Its effect on

students' academic achievement. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (Online),

8(11), 29. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/fitting-

technology-mathematics-pedagogy-effect-on/docview/1418722424/se-2.

7 EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ON STUDENTS

FEEDBACK PAGE

1. Please learn how to do titles on title page

2. Please learn how to do references hanging indent, what needs to be in italics. Also the word references is always plural even if only one. Always on a new page please.