sa-AD

profileBrucele
SUEZLANDFILLMCEFINAL.pptx

HARECRAG - SUSTAINABLE LANDFILL GAS MANAGEMENT

THE TEAM

SHYAMJITH HARIDAS – Technical Lead

Trainee - Oil and Natural Gas Corporation India Ltd

M.Sc, Engineering Management with Advanced Practice (Underway)

AKHIL PADINJARETHIL VARGHESE – Project Manager

Quality Control and Assurance Engineer - Federal Cables, Abu Dhabi (2 years)

M.Sc, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Technologies (Underway)

SESANTH KUMAR CHITTALURI – Communications Lead

Management Trainee - Tata projects

M.Sc, Construction Project Management + B.I.M (Underway)

INTRODUCTION

Sustainable gas management system at Harecrag

Aging Site

5 Proposals

120 KW Generator

DELIVERABLES

Sustainable landfill gas management at site

Permit Compliance

Removal of Generator

A toolbox of solutions

4

CASE

STUDIES ON ALL 5 SOLUTIONS

6

SOLUTIONS

Methane Oxidation

Internal Combustion engines

External Combustion engines

Conversion of L.F.G. to R.N.G.

Energy for Revenue

Low BTU  High BTU

Solar Panels

Renewable Energy Option

BIOFILTERS – CONTAINED / CLOSED TYPE

Change of medium in 5 - 7 years

Upto 90% methane destruction rate

6 biofilters with dimensions of 90m x 18m

Incubation period - 14 days

Highest oxidation rate – 90 days

Methane oxidation layer

Gas distribution layer (32-64mm)

0.8m

0.3m

7

Passive biofilter system

Methanotrophic bacteria

Temperature

14˚C - 18˚C

ph of water

7.5

Soil mosture

40-60%

BIO WINDOWS

Low OPEX and CAPEX make it financially viable

Closed bed is a modular system

Can be installed by any established supplier

BIOCOVERS

Capping of the whole area must be removed

Passive gas management

High surface area yields low local gas loads

SOLAR PANELS

Renewable energy source to replace the generator

Sunpal Quote recieved 120KW off-grid system

709 KWh/day

Encouraged by the agency

Competitors ------------------->

10

Let’s look at some numbers

Last 5 years

Diesel + Generator hire + Flare =

£ 98,275

Diesel for 1 hr

Full load : 32 litres

3/4th load : 24 litres

½ load : 16 litres

Cost of fuel

CAPEX

(Off-grid system)

¾ Load  4.25 years

½ Load  6.38 years

¼ Load  12.77 years

Fuel Cost

(3.19 years)

Generator = 1216 hrs in 2021

Full load = 38,912 litres

Avg. cost of red diesel 58.43 p per L = £ 22,736.28

Cost of off-grid system : £ 72,599.84

Newburn power rental

+

Trans cube(Midas UK) for

Fuel tank

11

EXTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES

ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE ENGINE

Tolerant to low quality gas  

Long engine life

LCOE – $0.3 /KWh

Cost of engine $155,167 in 2017 from Thailand case study

 Potential supplier

ORMAT®

E-Rational ORC

Turboden

STIRLING ENGINE

More robust than internal combustion engines

Generates electricity and heat from lean gas

Modular installation allows expansion

Cleanergy C9G stirling engine, distributed in UK

C9G Model

Even at 12m3 / hr gas – 7.2KW continuously

ROC 2.0 rating

CAPEX - £ 214,000 (ACUMEN 2015)

OPEX - £ 15000/annum

12

INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES

(with portable battery banks)

Portable and customizable

Capable of combusting lower methane content LFG - the gas is losing quality - Phase Ⅴ maturation

Capstone (Supplier – NewEnCo) from C30,C65-C1000

CAPEX £100,000 - depends on the number of turbines

OPEX varies between £5,000 and £10,000 per year.

Detailed case studies

Jenbacher

Capstone

13

LFG to RNG Conversion

Pressure swing adsorption

Highest methane generator (90-98%)

Low BTU gas  high BTU gas

Cost  £ 158,000 - £ 793,000

Investment is quite high, but earnings will help to overcome in future

Lean gas

engines

Recovered methane ---------> Electricity

LFG to RNG Conversion

Altamont landfill, USA

Displaced 2.5 million gallons of diesel

13,000 gallons of LNG per day

Fuels 300 garbage trucks

5 SIMILAR CASE STUDIES

Budget as of 2016,

$7 per million Btu (large scale)

$25 per million Btu (small scale)

15

SUSTAINABILITY

CONSIDERATIONS

SOLUTIONS ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICAL
Methane Oxidation × Chemicals Simple systems Less cost
Internal Combustion Engines ↓ Pollution ↓ Space Less cost Portable
External Combustion Engines × Exhaust gas ↓ C footprints Runs on low methane level
Solar Panels ↓ Greenhouse gas Replace generator ↓ operating & maintenance cost
LFG to RNG Conversion Traces hazardous pollutants ↓ C footprints High Investment ǃǃǃ

16

PERMIT COMPLIANCE

All clauses are examined individually in the toolbox

17

PERMIT : EPR/TP3031LV

Management

Operations

Emissions & Monitoring

Information

Energy Efficiency

Disposal of waste

Minimize pollution

Clause 2.7.1

Water, Air, Land

(generator & flare)

Liaising with agency

CONCLUSION

Intense, in-depth research

Project management tools utilized

5 sets of solutions

Case studies analyzed

Permit compliance

Sustainability analysis of 5 proposals

Thank You