|
Criteria
|
Levels of Achievement
|
|
Content 35
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Developing
|
Not present
|
|
Analyzes the material 20
|
18.5 – 20 Points
The topic is clearly presented and discussed in detail.
Additional screening and assessment instruments are identified and explained.
Diagnoses are clearly identified and are accurate. Consideration of self-report as compared to other sources of information is included as appropriate.
The Treatment Plan clearly addresses current functioning, mental health, substance use, and faith/spirituality with thorough recommendations.
The best treatment setting is clearly identified.
|
17-18 points
The topic is presented and discussed appropriately.
Additional screening and assessment instruments mentioned but not clearly explained or not properly applied.
Diagnoses are included but need some further consideration. Comparison of self-report and other sources needs further consideration.
The treatment plan addresses most of the following: current functioning, mental heath, substance use, faith/spirituality.
Treatment setting is identified.
|
1 - 16.5 points
The topic is unclear or fairly clear but discussed too broadly or does not meet expectations.
Missing coverage of additional screening and assessment instruments.
Diagnoses are included but need some further consideration. Comparison of self-report and other sources not considered.
The treatment plan addresses some of the following: current functioning, mental heath, substance use, faith/spirituality.
Treatment setting is missing.
|
0 points
Not discussed.
|
|
Synthesizes the topic into a thesis statement 5
|
4.5 - 5 points
The introductory paragraph contains a strong thesis statement and provides an overview of the paper.
|
4 - 4.5 points
The introduction paragraph contains a thesis statement.
|
1 – 3.5 points
The thesis statement and overview of the paper need improvement.
|
0 points
There is no thesis statement or overview of the paper.
|
|
Evaluates and concludes the information 10
|
9.5 - 10 points
Information is supported Relevant details are identified from Perkinson, Jongsma, and Bruce (2014) and other course resources.
The Conclusion section synthesizes information from the main sections and draws conclusions
|
8.5 – 9 points
Sources are used correctly, but not all 3 required texts are included. The conclusion summarizes the information presented in the body of the paper.
|
1 - 8 points
Sources are used but not critically evaluated and/or only one of 3 included. The conclusion does not adequately summarize the information presented in the body of the paper.
|
0 points
There is no conclusion and / or no sources.
|
|
Structure 15
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Developing
|
Not present
|
|
Mechanics 5
|
4.5 - 5 points
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate.
|
4 points
Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate.
|
1 – 3.5 points
Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good.
|
0 points
Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are misused. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor.
|
|
APA Format Elements 5
|
4.5 - 5 points
Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page and references are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.
|
4 points
Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page and references are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.
|
1 – 3.5 points
Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page and references are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.
|
0 points
Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page and references are not included or not formatted correctly. Paper is not double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect.
|
|
Research Elements 5
|
4.5 - 5 points
Academic primary and secondary materials are used well and include academic materials. The assignment incorporates multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate reference page is provided. Arguments are correctly supported with citations
|
4 points
Academic primary and secondary materials are used and include academic materials Arguments are supported with appropriate citations. A complete and accurate reference page is provided.
|
1 – 3.5 points
Academic sources are used though non-academic sources are also incorporated. Arguments incorporate support but often include personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are, at times, not used appropriately. An incomplete or inaccurate reference page is provided.
|
0 points
Appropriate sources are not used or sources are lacking entirely. Arguments are not supported with citations. Opposing viewpoints are dismissed or ignored. Reference page is incomplete or missing.
|
|
Total 50
|
Advanced 46 – 50
|
Proficient 41 - 45
|
Developing 1 - 40
|
Not present
|
|
Professor
Comments
|
|
n33dpap3rs
SUBS607TreatmentPlanGradingRubric.docx
0
