PM 002
fajphummie123
SubmissionFeedbackPM002.docx|
Submission Feedback |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PM002 Rubric feedback: O, Dr. Dyett Criteria Learning Objective 1.1: State the purpose and justification for a project.:
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe the objectives of a project.:
Learning Objective 1.3: Describe the high-level requirements for a project.:
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the tangible measures of project success.:
Learning Objective 2.1: Describe the assumptions for a project.:
Learning Objective 2.2: Describe the constraints for a project.:
Learning Objective 3.1: Prepare a milestone timeline chart for a project.:
Learning Objective 3.2: Describe the milestones for a project.:
Learning Objective 4.1: Identify the internal and external stakeholders for a project.:
Learning Objective 5.1: Describe the process for obtaining approval of the milestones for a project.:
Professional Skills Assessment Written Communication PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics:
Written Communication PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity:
Written Communication PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written work:
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies:
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions:
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and alternatives:
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills:
|
|
|
Rubric Name: PM002 Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
0 - Not Present
1 - Needs Improvement
2 - Meets Expectations
3 - Exceeds Expectations
Learning Objective 1.1: State the purpose and justification for a project.
Student did not submit this element of the assignment.
Student provides a cursory or incomplete statement with vague or missing details of the purpose of a project.
Student provides a statement with some details of the purpose of a project.
Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.Reasons why the project should be undertaken are aligned with the business case.
Student provides a detailed statement of the purpose of a project.
There are one or two minor details missing.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Student provides a statement with some details of the purpose of a project. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe the objectives of a project.
Student did not submit this element of the assignment.
Student provides a cursory or incomplete description with vague or missing details of the objectives of a project.
Student provides a description with some details of the objectives of a project.
Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.
Student provides a detailed description of the objectives of a project.
There are one or two minor details missing.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Student provides a description with some details of the objectives of a project. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Learning Objective 1.3: Describe the high-level requirements for a project.
Student did not submit this element of the assignment.
Student provides a cursory or incomplete description with vague or missing details of the high-level requirements for a project.
Student provides a description with some details of the high-level requirements for a project.
Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.
Student provides a detailed description of the high-level requirements for a project.
There are one or two minor details missing.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Student provides a description with some details of the high-level requirements for a project. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the tangible measures of project success.
Student did not submit this element of the assignment.
Student provides a cursory or incomplete description with vague or missing details of the tangible success measures for a project.
Student provides a description with some details of the tangible success measures for a project.
Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.
Student provides a detailed description of the tangible success measures for a project.
There are one or two minor details missing.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Student provides a description with some details of the tangible success measures for a project. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Learning Objective 2.1: Describe the assumptions for a project.
Student did not submit this element of the assignment.
Student provides a cursory or incomplete description with vague or missing details of three assumptions for a project.
Student provides a description with some details of three assumptions for a project.
Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.
Student provides a detailed description of three assumptions for a project.
There are one or two minor details missing.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Student provides a description with some details of three assumptions for a project. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Learning Objective 2.2: Describe the constraints for a project.
Student did not submit this element of the assignment.
Student provides a cursory or incomplete description with vague or missing details of three constraints for a project.
Student provides a description with some details of three constraints for a project.
Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.
Student provides a detailed description of three constraints for a project.
There are one or two minor details missing.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Student provides a description with some details of three constraints for a project. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Learning Objective 3.1: Prepare a milestone timeline chart for a project.
Student did not submit this element of the assignment.
Student provides a cursory or incomplete graphical timeline with vague or missing details of fewer than three project milestones.
Student provides a graphical timeline that depicts three project milestones.
Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.
Student provides a graphical timeline that depicts more than three project milestones.
There are one or two minor details missing.
Criterion Feedback
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
|
|
1 |
Student provides a cursory or incomplete graphical timeline with vague or missing details of fewer than three project milestones. |
|
Additional Comments: Milestones have zero durations. There are three milestones presented in the construction phase. You are to show in the graph and describe. |
Learning Objective 3.2: Describe the milestones for a project.
Student did not submit this element of the assignment.
Student provides a cursory or incomplete description with vague or missing details of fewer than three project milestones.
Student provides a description with some details of three project milestones.
Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.
Student provides a detailed description of more than three project milestones.
There are one or two minor details missing.
Criterion Feedback
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
|
|
1 |
Student provides a cursory or incomplete description with vague or missing details of fewer than three project milestones. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Learning Objective 4.1: Identify the internal and external stakeholders for a project.
Student did not submit this element of the assignment.
Student provides a cursory or incomplete table with vague or missing details of stakeholders that includes names, titles, and roles of fewer than three internal and fewer than three external stakeholders.
Student provides a table with some details of stakeholders that includes names, titles, and roles of three internal and three external stakeholders.
Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.
Student provides a detailed table of stakeholders that includes names, titles, and roles of more than three internal and more than three external stakeholders.
There are one or two minor details missing.
Criterion Feedback
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
|
|
1 |
Student provides a cursory or incomplete table with vague or missing details of stakeholders that includes names, titles, and roles of fewer than three internal and fewer than three external stakeholders. |
|
Additional Comments: You need to identify at least 3 internal and 3 external stakeholders. |
Learning Objective 5.1: Describe the process for obtaining approval of the milestones for a project.
Student did not submit this element of the assignment.
Student provides a cursory or incomplete description with vague or missing details of the process for project milestone approvals and who will be responsible for those approvals.
Student provides a description with some details of the process for project milestone approvals and who will be responsible for those approvals.
Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.
Student provides a detailed description of the process for project milestone approvals and who will be responsible for those approvals.
There are one or two minor details missing.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Student provides a description with some details of the process for project milestone approvals and who will be responsible for those approvals. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed. |
|
Additional Comments: |
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Professional Skills Assessment
0 - Not Present
1 - Needs Improvement
2 - Meets Expectations
3 - Exceeds Expectations
Written Communication PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics
Multiple major and minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are highly distracting and seriously impact readability.
Multiple minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are distracting and negatively impact readability.
Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English.
Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.
Grammar, spelling, and mechanics reflect a high level of accuracy in standard American English and enhance readability.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English. Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Written Communication PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity
Writing is poorly organized and incoherent. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are missing or inappropriate.
Writing is loosely organized. Limited use of introductions, transitions, and conclusions provides partial continuity.
Writing is generally well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions provide continuity and a logical progression of ideas.
Writing is consistently well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are used effectively to enhance clarity, cohesion, and flow.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Writing is generally well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions provide continuity and a logical progression of ideas. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Written Communication PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written work
APA conventions are not applied.
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied inconsistently.
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are generally applied correctly in most instances. Sources are generally cited appropriately and accurately.
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied correctly and consistently throughout the paper. Sources are consistently cited appropriately and accurately.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are generally applied correctly in most instances. Sources are generally cited appropriately and accurately. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies
Analysis of assumptions is missing.
Response is weak in assessing the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.
Response does not adequately identify and discuss the implications of fallacies or logical weaknesses in a given argument.
Response generally assesses the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.
Response identifies and discusses the implications of fallacies and/or logical weaknesses in a given argument.
Response clearly and comprehensively assesses the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.
Response provides a detailed and compelling analysis of implications of fallacies and logical weaknesses in a given argument.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Response generally assesses the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument. Response identifies and discusses the implications of fallacies and/or logical weaknesses in a given argument. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions
Assumptions are missing.
Response does not adequately present and discuss key assumptions in an original argument.
Response presents and discusses key assumptions in an original argument.
Response justifies the reasonableness and need for assumptions in an original argument.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Response presents and discusses key assumptions in an original argument. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and alternatives
Assessment of multiple perspectives and alternatives is missing.
Response does not identify nor adequately consider multiple perspectives or alternatives.
Response identifies and considers multiple perspectives and alternatives.
Response justifies selection of chosen alternative relative to others.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Response identifies and considers multiple perspectives and alternatives. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills
Problems and solutions are not identified.
Response presents solutions, but they are ineffective in addressing the specific problem.
Response presents solutions that are practical and work in addressing the specific problem.
Response presents compelling supporting arguments for proposed solutions.
Criterion Feedback
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS |
|
|
2 |
Response presents solutions that are practical and work in addressing the specific problem. |
|
Additional Comments: |
Overall Score
0 - Not Present
1 - Needs Improvement
2 - Meets Expectations
3 - Exceeds Expectations
Overall Feedback
O,
Overall, you seem to have a good understanding of these project charter concepts. There are a few areas that you need to improve on. I provided feedback above.
Dr. Dyett
|
|
|
|
Score |
|
|
Not Passed |
Bottom of Form
