Comm Regulation And Policy
|
Submission Feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Feedback |
|
|
11/29/21 Hello Brent, Thank you for the submission of your project, Comm Regulation and Policy. You have a great foundational start in each area. The project is lacking detailed speaker notes to support your ideas. Refer to the project rubric notes to work towards mastery. Reach out on the private discussion chat with any questions. Cameron |
|
|
|
Rubric Name: COM-30105 Project Rubric
Print Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Criterion Score
Describes the relationship of the First Amendment to contemporary communication practices
1 point
0 points
Score of Describes the relationship of the First Amendment to contemporary communication practices,/ 1
Criterion Feedback
11/29/21 You are doing a great job with detailing the First Amendment. The controversial case is lacking detail. Provide more context and detail regarding the case and the outcome.
Explains the impact federal regulatory bodies have on the work of communication professionals
1 point
0 points
Score of Explains the impact federal regulatory bodies have on the work of communication professionals,/ 1
Criterion Feedback
11/29/21 Good job discussing the FCC and NTIA. The directions require you to discuss Net Neutrality and its impact as well. Add this to the FCC discussion.
Describes the interrelationship between government regulators and the public or corporations
1 point
0 points
Score of Describes the interrelationship between government regulators and the public or corporations,/ 1
Criterion Feedback
11/29/21 Good foundational start to discussing government regulators and/or public corporations. In order to get more specific about the interrelationship discuss a case that highlights this relations. The following resources are good for specific case study examples: FCC Investigates Widespread CenturyLink Outage That Disrupted 911 Service (2:07) Was Janet Jackson Show Indecent? FCC, CBS Trade Arguments AT&T Faces $100 Million Fine for Misleading Consumers Sex v. Profanity: An Analysis of Indecency Fines From 2000–2005 (pp. 1–7 and 14–17)
Evaluates the balance of compliance with national security measures with maintaining source confidentiality by using specific examples
1 point
0 points
Score of Evaluates the balance of compliance with national security measures with maintaining source confidentiality by using specific examples,/ 1
Criterion Feedback
11/29/21 The first slide is good regarding national security and source confidentiality. The second slide is going off-base. Change this slide from highlighting the FCC and NTIA again and provide a specific case that shows the balance of national security and source confidentiality. These resources are good for example case studies: New York Times Publishes the Pentagon Papers Is the Pentagon Papers Case Relevant in the Age of WikiLeaks Journalist Could Be Imprisoned for Protecting Sources (2:58)
Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling; shows understanding of audience and purpose
1 point
0 points
Score of Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling; shows understanding of audience and purpose,/ 1
Criterion Feedback
11/29/21 You are doing well. Provide greater detail in paragraph form in the speaker notes.
Lists sources where needed using citation methods with no major errors
1 point
0 points
Score of Lists sources where needed using citation methods with no major errors,/ 1
Criterion Feedback
11/29/21 Add any new citations as you continue to build the presentation.
Rubric Total ScoreTotal