PART 2 PROJECT DUE IN 48 HOURS

Submission Feedback
Overall Feedback
I am not really sure what happened here, but external sources were not required.  According to your paper, you used only the video (which was correct) and the Schmitz book (which was not allowed).  Therefore, according to the rubric, your score was severely reduced.

This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.Criteria

Equivalent to an A

Equivalent to a B

Equivalent to a C

Equivalent to a D

Equivalent to an F

Criterion Score

Introduction

4 points

Writes an introduction that captures the reader's attention, gives context to the paper, and builds to the thesis (in the last sentence of the introduction) that defines all of the main points to be discussed in the paper.  

(3.6 - 4)

3.4 points

Writes an introduction that provides a general context to the paper, has a thesis statement and somewhat discusses main topics but is vague or does not cover all main topics. 

(2.9 - 3.5)

 

3 points

Writes an introduction that provides context to the paper and presents main topics covered in the paper but this information is not presented in a thesis statement but throughout the first paragraph.

(2.8 - 3.1)

 

2.6 points

Attempts to write an introduction but has little to no context to the paper; the thesis is missing main points or no thesis statement provided.  

(2.4 - 2.7)

 

0 points

No attempt to write an introduction.

(0)

Score of Introduction,3 / 4

Criterion Feedback

You need to make your thesis specific and not general

Discuss seven dimensions of Organizational Culture

6 points

Uses the course materials to thoroughly and correctly discuss the seven dimensions of organizational culture.

(5.4 - 6)

 

5.1 points

Uses the course materials to discuss the seven dimensions of organizational culture; needs some development.

(4.8 - 5.3)

4.5 points

Uses the course materials to discuss the seven dimensions of organizational culture; needs significant development.

(4.2 - 4.7)

 

3.9 points

Attempts to discuss the dimensions of organizational culture but fails to use course materials, not all dimensions discussed or needs major development.

 

(3.6 - 4.1) 

0 points

Little to no attempt to discuss dimensions of organizational culture.

(0 - 3.5)

 

 

 

Score of Discuss seven dimensions of Organizational Culture,3.9 / 6

Criterion Feedback

Outside source was used

Describe what Spotify’s organizational culture looks like by presenting examples for each dimension descriptor.

22 points

Uses the course materials, video facts to provide at least one example for each OC dimension descriptor to thoroughly and correctly describe Spotify's organizational culture. Shows strong connections between examples and course materials. (only course materials and video used).

(19.8 - 22)

18.7 points

Uses the course materials, video facts to provide at least one example for each OC dimension descriptor to describe Spotify's organizational culture; shows some connection between examples and course materials; some development needed (only course materials and video used).  

(17.6 - 19.7)

16.5 points

Uses the course materials, video facts to provide at least one generally stated example for each OC dimension descriptor to describe Spotify's organizational culture; connections are not consistently clear; significant development needed (only course materials and video used).

 

(15.4 - 17.5)

14.3 points

Attempts to describes what Spotify's organizational culture looks like but examples are incorrect, missing or needs more description to see connection;   does not use both the video and the course materials to support the descriptions of Spotify's organizational culture; uses external sources; needs major development.

(13.2 - 15.3)

0 points

Little to no attempt to describe Spotify's organizational culture.

(0 - 13.1)

Score of Describe what Spotify’s organizational culture looks like by presenting examples for each dimension descriptor.,14.3 / 22

Criterion Feedback

Good content, but outside sources were used, rather than course material

Discuss how Spotify uses its corporate culture to create a competitive advantage

20 points

Thoroughly and correctly discusses how Spotify uses its corporate culture to create a competitive advantage using the course materials and information from the video (No external sources used).

(18 - 20)

 

 

 

17 points

Discusses how Spotify uses its corporate culture to create a competitive advantage using the course materials and information from the video; some development is needed; (No external sources used).

(16 - 17.9)

 

15 points

Discusses how Spotify uses its corporate culture to create a competitive advantage using the course materials and information from the video; significant development is needed; (No external sources used).

(14 - 15.9)

13 points

Attempts to discuss how Spotify uses its corporate culture to create a competitive advantage using the course materials and information from the video; uses external sources; major development is needed

(12 - 13.9)

0 points

Little to no attempt to discuss how Spotify uses its corporate culture to create a competitive advantage.

(0 - 11. 9)

 

 

 

Score of Discuss how Spotify uses its corporate culture to create a competitive advantage,13 / 20

Criterion Feedback

Failure to use course material for support

Identify and discuss Spotify’s organizational structure from what you see in the video and use the course materials to support your description of the structure. Make sure to use examples from the video. Do not use external source materials.

20 points

Uses the course materials and the video facts and two examples from the video to thoroughly and correctly identify and discuss Spotify's organizational structure (No external sources used).

(18 - 20)

17 points

Uses the course materials and the video facts and one examples from the video to thoroughly and correctly identify and discuss Spotify's organizational structure; some development is needed; (No external sources used).

(16 - 17.9)

15 points

Uses the course materials and the video facts and two examples from the video to thoroughly and correctly identify and discuss Spotify's organizational structure; significant development is needed; (No external sources used).

(14 - 15.9)

13 points

Incorrectly identifies or discusses organizational structure from the video; uses minimal or little course material; external sources used; major development needed.

(12 - 13.9)

0 points

Little to no attempt to identify and discuss organizational structure.

(0 - 11. 9)

 

 

 

Score of Identify and discuss Spotify’s organizational structure from what you see in the video and use the course materials to support your description of the structure. Make sure to use examples from the video. Do not use external source materials.,13 / 20

Criterion Feedback

Course materials needed for support

Conclusion

3 points

In a clear and concise manner, comprehensively concludes the paper by restating/ summarizing the main findings covered in the paper and reflects on the importance of the arguments made.  

(2.7 - 3)

2.55 points

In a clear way  concludes the paper by restating/ summarizing the main findings;  some development is needed. 

(2.4 - 2.6)

2.25 points

Concludes the paper by somewhat restating/ summarizing the argument.  Attempts to bring in some explanation or general idea of the main findings of the paper but needs significant development.

(2.1 - 2.3)

1.95 points

Presents a conclusion but may be irrelevant to the main findings of the paper OR does not discuss the main findings of the paper. 

(1.8 - 2)

0 points

Fails to present restatement/ summarization of argument.

(0 - 1.7)

Score of Conclusion,3 / 3

Criterion Feedback

Good summation

Attention to Instructions

10 points

The paper contains all major assignment tasks.  The paper also includes completion of all required elements (Word or rtf file, third person writing, paraphrasing, no more than four consecutive words from source, no contractions, page/paragraph numbers/Chapter Titles). 

(9 - 10)

 

8.5 points

 

The paper contains all major assignment tasks.  The paper missed one minor element (Word or rtf file, third person writing, paraphrasing, no more than four consecutive words from source, no contractions, page/paragraph/numbers/Chapter Titles).   (8 - 8.9)

 

 

7.5 points

One major assignment task and/or two minor elements of the assignment missed.  

(7 - 7.9)

 

 

6.5 points

Two major assignment tasks missed  and/or 3 minor elements of the assignments.

(6 - 6.9)

 

 

 

 

0 points

Three or more major assignment tasks missed OR four or more minor elements missed.

(0 - 5.9)

Score of Attention to Instructions,8.5 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Exceeded 6 pages of content

Writing Mechanics

10 points

Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No jargon used. Few writing errors noted.

(9 - 10)

 

8.5 points

Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. One - three errors noted.

(8 - 8.9)

 

 

7.5 points

Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Four to seven errors noted.

(7 - 7.9)

 

 

6.5 points

Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 7 errors found.

(6 - 6.9)

 

 

0 points

Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible, or errors are too plentiful to count.

(0 - 5.9)

Score of Writing Mechanics,10 / 10

APA Style (7th ed.)

5 points

Excellent use APA style, few usage errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper; Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.

(4.5 - 5)

 

4.25 points

Uses in-text citations and reference list but 1 - 2 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times.

(4 - 4.4)

 

 

 

 

3.75 points

Uses in-text citations and reference lists; but 3 - 4 APA style errors  noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 3 - 4 times.

(3.5 - 3.9)

 

 

 

3.25 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; but 5 - 6 times style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 5-6 times.  Seldom uses APA.

(3 - 3.4)

 

 

0 points

No attempt at APA style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.

(0 – 2.99)

Score of APA Style (7th ed.),2 / 5Criterion score has been overridden

Criterion Feedback

In-text citations require page/paragraph# or min:sec, outside sources not allowed

Rubric Total ScoreTotal

Score of Project #2 Organizing (15%),70.7 / 100

Overall Score

Overall Score

Equivalent to an A90 points minimum

Equivalent to a B80 points minimum

Equivalent to a C70 points minimum

Equivalent to a D60 points minimum

Equivalent to an F0 points minimum

Score
10.6 / 15 - 70.7 %