Epidemiology Master Level Quiz

profilespiderman2017
StudyDesignsCase-ControlStudiesandOtherNestedDesigns.pdf

Study Designs: Case-Control Studies and Other Nested Designs

David Celentano, ScD, MHS Johns Hopkins University

Step 1: Is There an Association?

2

Disease or other

health outcome Exposure

Can use different study designs to address this research question

Main Types of Epidemiologic Study Designs

3

Study type Characteristics

Experimental • Studies prevention and treatment of disease • Investigator actively manipulates which groups receive the study agent

Observational • Studies causes, prevention and treatment for diseases • Investigator watches as natures takes its course

Cohort • Examines multiple health effects of an exposure • Subjects defined by exposure levels and follow for disease occurrence

Case-control • Typically examines multiple exposures in relation to a disease • Subjects are defined as cases and controls and exposure histories compared

Cross-sectional • Examine relationship between exposure and disease prevalence in a defined population at one point in time

Ecological • Examines relationship between exposure and disease with population-level data rather than individual data

Example of Case-Control Study

4

Example of Case- Control Study

5

The material in this video is subject to the copyright of the owners of the material and is being provided for educational purposes under rules of fair use for registered students in this course only. No additional copies of the copyrighted work may be made or distributed.

Design of Case-Control Studies

!  When the disease is rare (low prevalence)

!  Observing a series of cases, it is difficult to interpret what would be occurring in non- cases !  Hence, we need a comparison—or “control”—group

!  Comparison is an essential component of any epidemiologic investigation

Typical Uses of Case-Control Design

7

Design of a Case-Control Study

8

Design of a Case-Control Study

9

Design of a Case-Control Study

10

Case-Control Study

11

Cases (with disease)

Controls (without disease)

Were exposed a b

Were not exposed c d

Totals a + c b + d

Proportions exposed a

a + c b

b + d

First, select:

Case-Control Study

12

Cases (with disease)

Controls (without disease)

Were exposed a b

Were not exposed c d

Totals a + c b + d

Proportions exposed a

a + c b

b + d

Then,

measure

past

exposure

Case-Control Study

13

Eurosurveillance.org: June, 2013

14

Design of a Case-Control Study

15

Case-Control Study

16

Cases (with disease)

Controls (without disease)

Were exposed a b

Were not exposed c d

Totals a + c b + d

Proportions exposed a

a + c b

b + d

First, select:

Then,

measure

past

exposure

Cohort Study

17

Disease

develops

Disease

does not

develop Totals Incidence

Were exposed

a b a + b a

a +b

Were not exposed

c d c + d c

c + d

Then, follow to see whether:

First,

select:

a a + b

= Incidence in exposed c

c + d = Incidence in non-exposed

Case-Control Study

18

CHD Controls

Smoke cigarettes 112 176

Do not smoke cigarettes 88 224

Total 200 400

% smoking cigarettes 56.0% 44.0%

In a Case-Control Study, We Can Study Multiple Exposures

19

Where Do the Cases Come From?

20

The material in this video is subject to the copyright of the owners of the material and is being provided for educational purposes under rules of fair use for registered students in this course only. No additional copies of the copyrighted work may be made or distributed.

Control Selection and the Interpretation of Results in Case-Control Studies

Section B

!  Eligible to become cases if develop disease

!  Similar to cases on key factors

!  Representative of “source” population

Control Selection

2

Control Selection

3

Control Selection

4

!  Hospital/clinic based !  Convenient !  Difficult in ensuring that exposure reflects underlying reference population

!  Population/community controls !  Often less convenient/more expensive !  Less of above concerns

Types of Controls

5

Some Types of Non-Hospital Controls

!  Probability sample of total population

!  Neighborhood !  Walk (door to door) !  Random digit dialing !  Letter carrier route

!  Best friend or associate

!  Spouse or sibling

!  Birth certificate match !  For childhood diseases

!  Classmate !  For childhood diseases

6

Selection of Controls: MacMahon's Case-Control Study of Pancreatic Cancer

!  Included !  All other patients who were under

the care of the same physician in the same hospital at the time of the interview of a patient with pancreatic cancer

!  Excluded !  Patients with pancreatic or

hepatobiliary tract diseases known to be associated with smoking or alcohol consumption

!  Patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, respiratory or bladder cancer, and peptic ulcer

!  Non-Whites; older than 79 years

7

Estimated Relative Risk of Pancreatic Cancer by Sex and Coffee Drinking Habits

Source: (1981). MacMahon et al. 8

0 1–2 3–4 >5

Men 1.0 2.6 2.3 2.6

Women 1.0 1.6 3.3 3.1

Both sexes 1.0 2.1 2.8 3.2

Coffee drinking (cups/day)

Estimated Relative Risks of Pancreatic Cancer for Use of Coffee and Cigarettes

Source: (1981). MacMahon et al. 9

Cigarette smoking 0 1–2 >3 Total

Never 1.0 2.1 3.1 1.0

Ex-smokers 1.3 4.0 3.0 1.3

Current smokers 1.2 2.2 4.6 1.2

Total 1.0 1.8 2.7

Coffee drinking (cups/day)

Interpreting the Results of a Case-Control Study of Coffee and Pancreatic Cancer

10

Interpreting the Results of a Case-Control Study of Coffee and Pancreatic Cancer

11

Matching

12

!  The process of selecting controls so that they are similar to the cases in regard to certain characteristics such as age, sex, and race

Matching

13

!  Group matching !  Frequency matching, stratification

!  Individual matching !  Matched pairs

Matching in Case-Control Studies

14

Multiple controls

15

A.  Controls from the same source; controls of a similar type !  For example, two hospital controls per case

B.  Controls from different sources !  For example, hospital and neighborhood controls

!  How does this help? !  Increases the statistical probability of showing a true difference if there is one !  Improves generalizability of findings

Types of Multiple Controls Used in Case-Control Studies

16

Study Groups in Gold’s Study of Brain Tumors in Children

Source: (1979). Gold et al. 17

Study Groups in Gold’s Study of Brain Tumors in Children

Source: (1979). Gold et al. 18

Study Groups in Gold’s Study of Brain Tumors in Children

Source: (1979). Gold et al. 19

!  Limitations in human ability to recall

!  Recall bias: cases may remember their exposure more than controls do

!  Cases may also attribute exposures

Problems of Recall in Case-Control Studies

20

!  Matching on many variables may make it difficult to find an appropriate control

!  We cannot explore the possible association of the disease with any variable on which the cases and controls have been matched !  Therefore, you need to be cautious about what you choose to match

Problems with Matching

21

!  Example: A study of maternal infections during pregnancy and congenital malformation

An Artificial Association Resulting from Recall Bias

22

Assume: Cases (congenital malformations)

Controls (no malformations)

True incidence of infection 15% 15%

Percent of infections recalled 90% 10%

Infection rate as ascertained by interview 13.5% 1.5%

The material in this video is subject to the copyright of the owners of the material and is being provided for educational purposes under rules of fair use for registered students in this course only. No additional copies of the copyrighted work may be made or distributed.

Nested Case-Control Studies

Section C

Design of a Nested Case-Control Study

2

Design of a Nested Case-Control Study

3

Design of a Nested Case-Control Study

4

Case-Control Study

5

Nested Case Control Example

6

Nested Case- Control within a Cohort Study

7

1.  Possibility of recall bias is eliminated because data on exposures are obtained before disease develops

2.  Exposure data are more likely to represent the pre-illness state because they are obtained years before clinical illness is diagnosed

3.  Costs are reduced compared to those of a prospective study because laboratory tests need to be done only on specimens from subjects who are later chosen as cases or as controls

Advantages of Nested Case-Control Studies

8

1.  Described the structure and design elements of case-control studies

2.  Described the selection of cases and controls—and the process of matching

3.  Discussed potential sources of bias and distinguished between nested and non-nested designs

Summary

9

Main Types of Epidemiologic Study Designs

10

Study type Characteristics

Experimental • Studies prevention and treatment of disease • Investigator actively manipulates which groups receive the study agent

Observational • Studies causes, prevention and treatment for diseases • Investigator watches as natures takes its course

Cohort • Examines multiple health effects of an exposure • Subjects defined by exposure levels and follow for disease occurrence

Case-control • Typically examines multiple exposures in relation to a disease • Subjects are defined as cases and controls and exposure histories compared

Cross-sectional • Examine relationship between exposure and disease prevalence in a defined population at one point in time

Ecological • Examines relationship between exposure and disease with population-level data rather than individual data

Your feedback is very important and will be used for future revisions. The Evaluation link is available on the lecture page.

Lecture Evaluation

11