Epidemiology Master Level Quiz
Study Designs: Case-Control Studies and Other Nested Designs
David Celentano, ScD, MHS Johns Hopkins University
Step 1: Is There an Association?
2
Disease or other
health outcome Exposure
Can use different study designs to address this research question
Main Types of Epidemiologic Study Designs
3
Study type Characteristics
Experimental • Studies prevention and treatment of disease • Investigator actively manipulates which groups receive the study agent
Observational • Studies causes, prevention and treatment for diseases • Investigator watches as natures takes its course
Cohort • Examines multiple health effects of an exposure • Subjects defined by exposure levels and follow for disease occurrence
Case-control • Typically examines multiple exposures in relation to a disease • Subjects are defined as cases and controls and exposure histories compared
Cross-sectional • Examine relationship between exposure and disease prevalence in a defined population at one point in time
Ecological • Examines relationship between exposure and disease with population-level data rather than individual data
Example of Case-Control Study
4
Example of Case- Control Study
5
The material in this video is subject to the copyright of the owners of the material and is being provided for educational purposes under rules of fair use for registered students in this course only. No additional copies of the copyrighted work may be made or distributed.
Design of Case-Control Studies
! When the disease is rare (low prevalence)
! Observing a series of cases, it is difficult to interpret what would be occurring in non- cases ! Hence, we need a comparison—or “control”—group
! Comparison is an essential component of any epidemiologic investigation
Typical Uses of Case-Control Design
7
Design of a Case-Control Study
8
Design of a Case-Control Study
9
Design of a Case-Control Study
10
Case-Control Study
11
Cases (with disease)
Controls (without disease)
Were exposed a b
Were not exposed c d
Totals a + c b + d
Proportions exposed a
a + c b
b + d
First, select:
Case-Control Study
12
Cases (with disease)
Controls (without disease)
Were exposed a b
Were not exposed c d
Totals a + c b + d
Proportions exposed a
a + c b
b + d
Then,
measure
past
exposure
Case-Control Study
13
Eurosurveillance.org: June, 2013
14
Design of a Case-Control Study
15
Case-Control Study
16
Cases (with disease)
Controls (without disease)
Were exposed a b
Were not exposed c d
Totals a + c b + d
Proportions exposed a
a + c b
b + d
First, select:
Then,
measure
past
exposure
Cohort Study
17
Disease
develops
Disease
does not
develop Totals Incidence
Were exposed
a b a + b a
a +b
Were not exposed
c d c + d c
c + d
Then, follow to see whether:
First,
select:
a a + b
= Incidence in exposed c
c + d = Incidence in non-exposed
Case-Control Study
18
CHD Controls
Smoke cigarettes 112 176
Do not smoke cigarettes 88 224
Total 200 400
% smoking cigarettes 56.0% 44.0%
In a Case-Control Study, We Can Study Multiple Exposures
19
Where Do the Cases Come From?
20
The material in this video is subject to the copyright of the owners of the material and is being provided for educational purposes under rules of fair use for registered students in this course only. No additional copies of the copyrighted work may be made or distributed.
Control Selection and the Interpretation of Results in Case-Control Studies
Section B
! Eligible to become cases if develop disease
! Similar to cases on key factors
! Representative of “source” population
Control Selection
2
Control Selection
3
Control Selection
4
! Hospital/clinic based ! Convenient ! Difficult in ensuring that exposure reflects underlying reference population
! Population/community controls ! Often less convenient/more expensive ! Less of above concerns
Types of Controls
5
Some Types of Non-Hospital Controls
! Probability sample of total population
! Neighborhood ! Walk (door to door) ! Random digit dialing ! Letter carrier route
! Best friend or associate
! Spouse or sibling
! Birth certificate match ! For childhood diseases
! Classmate ! For childhood diseases
6
Selection of Controls: MacMahon's Case-Control Study of Pancreatic Cancer
! Included ! All other patients who were under
the care of the same physician in the same hospital at the time of the interview of a patient with pancreatic cancer
! Excluded ! Patients with pancreatic or
hepatobiliary tract diseases known to be associated with smoking or alcohol consumption
! Patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, respiratory or bladder cancer, and peptic ulcer
! Non-Whites; older than 79 years
7
Estimated Relative Risk of Pancreatic Cancer by Sex and Coffee Drinking Habits
Source: (1981). MacMahon et al. 8
0 1–2 3–4 >5
Men 1.0 2.6 2.3 2.6
Women 1.0 1.6 3.3 3.1
Both sexes 1.0 2.1 2.8 3.2
Coffee drinking (cups/day)
Estimated Relative Risks of Pancreatic Cancer for Use of Coffee and Cigarettes
Source: (1981). MacMahon et al. 9
Cigarette smoking 0 1–2 >3 Total
Never 1.0 2.1 3.1 1.0
Ex-smokers 1.3 4.0 3.0 1.3
Current smokers 1.2 2.2 4.6 1.2
Total 1.0 1.8 2.7
Coffee drinking (cups/day)
Interpreting the Results of a Case-Control Study of Coffee and Pancreatic Cancer
10
Interpreting the Results of a Case-Control Study of Coffee and Pancreatic Cancer
11
Matching
12
! The process of selecting controls so that they are similar to the cases in regard to certain characteristics such as age, sex, and race
Matching
13
! Group matching ! Frequency matching, stratification
! Individual matching ! Matched pairs
Matching in Case-Control Studies
14
Multiple controls
15
A. Controls from the same source; controls of a similar type ! For example, two hospital controls per case
B. Controls from different sources ! For example, hospital and neighborhood controls
! How does this help? ! Increases the statistical probability of showing a true difference if there is one ! Improves generalizability of findings
Types of Multiple Controls Used in Case-Control Studies
16
Study Groups in Gold’s Study of Brain Tumors in Children
Source: (1979). Gold et al. 17
Study Groups in Gold’s Study of Brain Tumors in Children
Source: (1979). Gold et al. 18
Study Groups in Gold’s Study of Brain Tumors in Children
Source: (1979). Gold et al. 19
! Limitations in human ability to recall
! Recall bias: cases may remember their exposure more than controls do
! Cases may also attribute exposures
Problems of Recall in Case-Control Studies
20
! Matching on many variables may make it difficult to find an appropriate control
! We cannot explore the possible association of the disease with any variable on which the cases and controls have been matched ! Therefore, you need to be cautious about what you choose to match
Problems with Matching
21
! Example: A study of maternal infections during pregnancy and congenital malformation
An Artificial Association Resulting from Recall Bias
22
Assume: Cases (congenital malformations)
Controls (no malformations)
True incidence of infection 15% 15%
Percent of infections recalled 90% 10%
Infection rate as ascertained by interview 13.5% 1.5%
The material in this video is subject to the copyright of the owners of the material and is being provided for educational purposes under rules of fair use for registered students in this course only. No additional copies of the copyrighted work may be made or distributed.
Nested Case-Control Studies
Section C
Design of a Nested Case-Control Study
2
Design of a Nested Case-Control Study
3
Design of a Nested Case-Control Study
4
Case-Control Study
5
Nested Case Control Example
6
Nested Case- Control within a Cohort Study
7
1. Possibility of recall bias is eliminated because data on exposures are obtained before disease develops
2. Exposure data are more likely to represent the pre-illness state because they are obtained years before clinical illness is diagnosed
3. Costs are reduced compared to those of a prospective study because laboratory tests need to be done only on specimens from subjects who are later chosen as cases or as controls
Advantages of Nested Case-Control Studies
8
1. Described the structure and design elements of case-control studies
2. Described the selection of cases and controls—and the process of matching
3. Discussed potential sources of bias and distinguished between nested and non-nested designs
Summary
9
Main Types of Epidemiologic Study Designs
10
Study type Characteristics
Experimental • Studies prevention and treatment of disease • Investigator actively manipulates which groups receive the study agent
Observational • Studies causes, prevention and treatment for diseases • Investigator watches as natures takes its course
Cohort • Examines multiple health effects of an exposure • Subjects defined by exposure levels and follow for disease occurrence
Case-control • Typically examines multiple exposures in relation to a disease • Subjects are defined as cases and controls and exposure histories compared
Cross-sectional • Examine relationship between exposure and disease prevalence in a defined population at one point in time
Ecological • Examines relationship between exposure and disease with population-level data rather than individual data
Your feedback is very important and will be used for future revisions. The Evaluation link is available on the lecture page.
Lecture Evaluation
11