Nursing
Health Literacy Review of
PCOS Educational Material HEALTH LITERACY AND PERSON EDUCATION
STUDENT NAME
1
Introduction - PCOS
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Is this material credible?
Is this material valid?
Is this material accessible?
Does this material provide patients with
a better understanding of PCOS?
Mayo Clinic
Non-profit healthcare organization
providing healthcare, education, and
research
Finding Quality Information framework at NIH
Principles of literacy and health literacy
What is literacy?
What is health literacy?
(Mayo Clinic, 2022)
This assignment evaluates a Mayo Clinic website, titled,
“Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS).” In this
assignment, I will use the Finding Quality Information
framework at NIH and the principles of literacy and
health literacy to evaluate the appropriateness of this
educational material. This website provides an overview
of PCOS for the lay person. The goal of this website is to
provide information for patients on PCOS and the causes,
complications, signs, and symptoms of the disease (Mayo
Clinic, 2022). This website was created by Mayo Clinic.
Mayo Clinic is a non-profit health care organization that
provides healthcare, education, and research (Mayo
2
Clinic, n.d.).
Some of the key points will be:
- Is this material credible?
- Is this material valid?
- Is this material accessible?
- Does this material provide patients with a better
understanding of PCOS?
Hyperlinks:
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
About Mayo Clinic
2
Intended Population
(Mayo Clinic, n.d.)
Intended for patients
Women of childbearing age and those that know or care for someone with PCOS
English-language readers
The intended population for the PCOS material is
patients with no medical background. Mayo Clinic also
provides educational material about current practices and
research that is intended for medical professionals.
However, this material is written in lay terms. Since this
material covers PCOS, it is likely intended for those that
may be affected by PCOS, mainly women of childbearing
age. However, it is also likely intended for those that may
know or care for someone with PCOS.
This material is written in English, which requires its
audience to be able to read English. Being a Minnesota-
3
based company, a high percentage of Mayo Clinic’s
audience is likely English-speaking. However, Mayo
Clinic is known for being a destination for international
healthcare, which requires language accessibility.
3
Literacy vs. Health Literacy
Literacy
The National Literacy Trust defines literacy as,
“the ability to read, write, speak, and listen in a way that lets us communicate effectively and make sense of the world”
(National Literacy Trust, n.d.).
Health Literacy
The CDC defines personal health literacy as,
“the degree to which individuals have the ability to find, understand, and use information and services to inform health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others”
(CDC, 2022).
The National Literacy Trust defines literacy as, “the
ability to read, write, speak, and listen in a way that lets
us communicate effectively and make sense of the world”
(National Literacy Trust, n.d.).
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
defines personal health literacy as, “the degree to which
individuals have the ability to find, understand, and use
information and services to inform health-related
decisions and actions for themselves and others” (CDC,
2022).
4
Health literacy requires literacy. However, one could be
literate and have poor health literacy. They may not have
a good understanding of the body and its functions.
Additionally, they may not understand how decisions
about their healthcare may affect them.
4
Interview
Wide range of health literacy levels at
the Alternative Learning Center
Nutrition and health information is
always changing
Families and interest levels play a role in
health literacy levels
Misinformation from peers can
contribute to poor health literacy
Sometimes there is too much
information available to adequately
decipher
You can find anything you want to hear
on the internet
It is important to teach our youth about
health and help them improve their
health literacy
I discussed literacy and health literacy with a physical
education and health teacher in the local K12 school
system. She has taught multiple age groups and is
currently at the high school for physical education, and
the Alternative Learning Center (ALC), where she is
teaching health. She notes that there is a wide range of
health literacy with her ALC students. She believes this is
due to the varied reasons that one might attend the ALC,
including drug-related reasons, academic reasons, or
mental health. She notes that many of them think they
understand nutrition, but they really don’t. She also
mentions that some of her students are very informed
5
about topics that she would assume they wouldn’t know,
but others have no concept of health at all. She says that
some of them are really smart but have a hard time
showing up to class. Others are motivated to be really
health. She also addresses the misinformation her
students receive from their peers about drugs and alcohol.
She believes that the wide range of health literacy levels
stem from their families and the different levels of
interest that some students and their families show for
health. She also believes that some of our issues with
health literacy stems from all of the accessible
information on the internet. She believes that sometimes
too much information is a not a good thing. She gave an
example about one time when she ate rancid pine nuts,
and her sense of taste was completely off. At the time,
everything she found about her symptoms led to cancer,
which wasn’t ultimately the case. She said that it is hard
to decipher health information from the internet because
there are too many possibilities out there that a medical
professional would be able to rule out. Not many people
will read medical journals, and even those can be hard to
determine credibility and motive. She believes that you
can find whatever answer you want to hear if you are
looking on the internet, and that is not always helpful for
people. She discusses the importance of teaching our
population, especially our youth, about health and the
importance of health literacy, especially because health
and nutrition are always changing.
5
Literacy and Health Literacy
In the U.S. over half the population is at a 7th grade reading level or lower
Health literacy requires some level of literacy
One could be literate and still have poor health literacy
(Wylie, 2021)
Both literacy and health literacy are a way to describe
comprehension of communicated information that allows
the information to be utilized by the person. Health
literacy requires some level of literacy. However, one
could be literate and have poor health literacy. They may
not have a good understanding of the body and its
functions. Additionally, they may not understand how
decisions about their healthcare may affect them.
The student population discussed with the health teacher
fits into the intended population for my PCOS
educational material, as many of these students are
6
females of childbearing age. As described by the teacher,
there is a wide variety of literacy and health literacy
levels in this population. In the U.S. over half the
population is at a 7th grade reading level or lower (Wylie,
2021).
I do believe that this educational material is appropriate
for the intended population. It is geared toward the lay
person and not medical professionals. It clearly describes
PCOS for those without an understanding of it, describes
the signs and symptoms that may accompany it, and
mentions some complications to watch for. However, it
may be beneficial to have this available in other
languages.
6
Readability Tool
(Readability Test, n.d.)
The Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease score is a 53.9
(Readability Test, n.d.). A score between 60 and 80
should be easy for a 12- to 15-year-old to understand
(Readability Test, n.d.). The Flesch Kincaid Reading
Ease is the most widely used measure of readability and
is ranked from 0 to 100 with a higher score being better
(Readability Test, n.d.). It uses words per sentence and
syllables per word to determine a score (Readability Test,
n.d.). Flesch Kincaid describes 65 as a good target for
most businesses (Readability Test, n.d.). However, this
Reading Ease score is 53.9, which is a little bit below
that. This may be slightly difficult for the intended
7
audience.
The Flesch Kincaid Grade Level is a 7.2. This score gives
a reference to the American School grade you would
need to be in to comprehend the material (Readability
Test, n.d.). This score is also determined by words per
sentence and syllables per word (Readability Test, n.d.).
They list 7th grade as a good target (Readability Test,
n.d.). At 7.2, the grade level is relatively close to the 7th
grade reading level target, making it an appropriate
resource for the intended population.
The Automated Readability Index is a 6.1 grade level.
This score helps measure how easy the text is to
understand and gives you an estimate of the U. S grade
level. This score is calculated using characters per word
and words per sentence. Over half of U.S. adults read at a
7th grade reading level or below (Wylie, 2021). This score
places this educational material below a 7th grade reading
level, making it an appropriate resource for the intended
population.
7
Credibility and Validity
Credibility
Believability, trust, reliability, and
confidence in a person, object, or process
(Sbaffi & Rowley, 2017)
Validity
Soundness and strength of argument
(University of Maryland, n.d.)
One way to evaluate the credibility of a website is to
evaluate the timeliness, authority, audience, relevance,
and perspective of a source (Whitchurch, 2022). This can
be done by looking for appropriate timelines for your
information, such as using recent research (Whitchurch,
2022). It also means looking for authors or organizations
that have the authority to speak on a certain topic, peer-
reviewed journals, or appropriate credentials
(Whitchurch, 2022). It is important to consider the
publication’s purpose for sharing the information
(Whitchurch, 2022).
8
To determine the validity of a source, we can look at the
author of a source, how the source got its information,
and the type of source the information is coming from
(University of Maryland, n.d.). When evaluating an
author, consider the credentials of the author and their
mission and goals (University of Maryland, n.d.). We can
also consider the references and whether they are reliable
sources of information and if they are cited correctly, or if
the author didn’t include references at all (University of
Maryland, n.d.). It is also important to consider the type
of source that the information is coming from, such as
commercial sources, non-commercial sources,
educational or scholarly sources, or government sources
(University of Maryland, n.d.).
8
NIH Framework Who runs the site?
Who pays for the site?
What is the site’s purpose?
What is the original source of the site’s information?
How does the site document the evidence supporting its information?
Who reviewed the information before the owner posted it on the site?
How current is the information on the site?
(National Institutes of Health, 2022)
The owner of the site, Mayo Clinic, is clearly noted on
every major page, along with a link to the site’s
homepage. This makes it easy to see who is responsible
for the site and its information.
This site is paid for by the owner, Mayo Clinic, as
evidenced by the “.org” address, which denotes it as a
non-commercial organization. While it does have
advertisements on the page to help fund the website,
there is a clear disclaimer that notes that Mayo Clinic
does not endorse any products. This helps provide
credibility for the site.
9
The site’s purpose is to provide site visitors with access
to knowledge, services, and experiences of Mayo Clinic
(Mayo Clinic Staff, 2018). Their goal is to meet visitor
needs, as well as providing access to care at Mayo Clinic.
This helps provide the community with access to
information and care, increasing the credibility of Mayo
Clinic.
The site’s information comes from a variety of sources
including Mayo Clinic medical experts, medical journals,
and credible sources like American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). The evidence
supporting its information is documented in the reference
list at the bottom of the page, with links to each source.
This information is then written and reviewed by Mayo
Clinic Staff, which includes a variety of experts for
multiple topics.
The information on the site is very current. The site was
reviewed and updated in September of 2022, and each of
the sources are from the last two years.
The only links to any other sites on this webpage are
links to other areas of Mayo Clinic and the references at
the bottom of the page. For example, there are links to the
Mayo Clinic store, Mayo Clinic appointment requests,
other Mayo Clinic web pages for related information, and
9
links to their social media accounts. The other links are
embedded in the reference list for the medical journals
and other credible sites that their medical information
comes from. This helps provide a level of credibility and
validity, as their outside information is accessible, but
they do not otherwise link to other sources.
9
Date of
Issue or
Revision
Information gives credibility and validity to the site
Last updated September 8th, 2022
Current evidence from 11 sources all within the last 2 years
Credible sources like medical journals and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
(Mayo Clinic, 2022)
This site is active and current. The material was last
updated September 8th, 2022. The medical evidence on
the site is current. This is evidenced by the 11 references
they have listed on the site. All the references are from
within the last two years and come from medical journals
or other credible sources like the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). This current
and frequently updated information helps give credibility
and validity to the site and its PCOS material.
10
Credentials of
Source
Bias and sponsorship occur, decreasing credibility and validity
Disclaimer that Mayo Clinic does not endorse and products or companies
Bias toward receiving care through Mayo Clinic
Some of the advertisement seems connected to the healthcare site
Some of the advertisement seems completely unrelated
(Mayo Clinic, 2022)
The name on this website is Mayo Clinic, and it is run
and written by Mayo Clinic staff. Both bias and
sponsorship occur on this site, decreasing the level of
credibility and validity. However, they give a disclaimer
that Mayo Clinic does not endorse any companies or
products but that the advertising revenue helps support
their not-for-profit mission. Within their educational
material, they provide a link to products and services to
the Mayo Clinic store. They also provide a link to request
an appointment at Mayo Clinic. Off to the side of the
educational material, they have an advertising box that is
advertising Aetna Medicare Solutions and a clothing
11
company. While the Aetna advertisement is geared
toward healthcare, since it is on a healthcare site, the
clothing company advertisement seems to be based on
my recent searches and unrelated to the website. The bias
and sponsorship occurring on this site decrease the
credibility and validity. However, the disclaimer helps
reduce the impact of the bias and sponsorship.
11
Accuracy and Evidence
(Mayo Clinic, 2022)
The information is accurate. It is backed by 11 credible
references that have all been published in the last two
years. They all come from medical journals or other
credible sources like the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). The intended
audience is their patient population, specifically women
of childbearing age and those who know or care for
someone with PCOS. It is also intended for English-
language readers. I do believe that this information is
appropriate for the intended population. There is also a
disclaimer about when to see a doctor, as well as a link
provided to request an appointment at Mayo Clinic. I
12
believe this additional information adds credibility and
validity to the site. The site clearly lists certain criteria to
look for to help determine when one would need to see a
doctor.
12
Multimedia or Applications
Functioning hyperlinks
Link to references
Link to appointment requests
Link to women’s health products sold by Mayo Clinic
Link to another educational page regarding diagnosis and treatment
(Mayo Clinic, 2022)
Each of the multimedia and applications tools work. The
site provides a few hyperlinks to appointment requests,
women’s health products for sale at Mayo Clinic, PCOS
care at Mayo Clinic, and the opportunity to subscribe to
their emails. Each of these hyperlinks is functioning
correctly. The website is well-organized and easy to
navigate. This helps to provide credibility and validity to
the site.
The site also provides a link to another Mayo Clinic
educational page about diagnosis and treatment of PCOS,
including a section on preparing for an appointment and a
13
list of doctors and specialists that treat PCOS. The
references section also provides a link to each of the
references, which helps make the information more
accessible and trustworthy.
13
Protection and Security
Privacy policy
“Contact Us” hyperlink
Inquiries directed to appointment request function
(Mayo Clinic Staff, 2022)
This site has a privacy policy that lays out the
information they collect and the reasons for it. They
collect information given to them, personal data, through
filling out forms, surveys, or transactions. They also
collect usage data from their site. They only disclose
personal data for a buyer in the event of a merger, with
consent to fulfill the purpose for which it was provided,
to comply with laws, and other necessary reasons. They
also use encryption technology to provide safety and
security for information provided.
The website users are able to use a “contact us”
14
hyperlink. This hyperlink directs users to a page with
multiple options for contact including telephone,
addresses, and phone numbers for multiple locations.
This provides accessibility, increasing the credibility and
validity of the site.
They do not allow users to post to the website or ask a
question. Instead, they direct inquiries to their
appointment request function. This increases credibility
and validity because it encourages proper care and
reduces the misinformation available by unsupervised
commenters on the site.
I believe these functions and safety measures do help
provide a level of credibility and validity. While there are
always privacy risks when using the internet, they do take
measures to help protect information and reduce the risks.
14
Summary
Literacy Health literacy
Readability Tool
NIH Framework
Credibility Validity
Mayo Clinic’s educational material on PCOS was
reviewed for literacy, health literacy, NIH Framework,
credibility and validity. This material was evaluated using
a Readability tool to determine the literacy level. The
literacy level was determined to be fairly good for the
intended audience. Health literacy was also discussed and
was determined to be appropriate as it is written for the
lay person and not medical professionals. Using the NIH
framework, the site was evaluated for credibility and
validity and was determined to be appropriate for its
intended audience. Overall, I believe this material is a
good source of information for the target population.
15
References
CDC. (2022, February 2). What is health literacy? Take action. Find out. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html
Mayo Clinic. (n.d.). About Mayo Clinic . Retrieved December 5, 2022, from https://www.mayoclinic.org/about-mayo-clinic
Mayo Clinic. (2022, September 8). Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) . Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pcos/symptoms-
causes/syc-20353439
Mayo Clinic Staff. (2018, December 1). Content development policy—About this site—Mayo clinic. Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/about-this-
site/product-development-policy
Mayo Clinic Staff. (2022, January 27). Privacy policy—About this site—Mayo clinic. Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/about-this-site/privacy-
policy
National Institutes of Health. (2022, May 4). How to evaluate health information on the internet: Questions and answers.
https://ods.od.nih.gov/HealthInformation/How_To_Evaluate_Health_Information_on_the_Internet_Questions_and_Answers.aspx
CDC. (2022, February 2). What is health literacy? Take
action. Find out. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html
Mayo Clinic. (n.d.). About Mayo Clinic . Retrieved
16
December 5, 2022, from
https://www.mayoclinic.org/about-mayo-clinic
Mayo Clinic. (2022, September 8). Polycystic ovary
syndrome (PCOS) . Mayo Clinic.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-
conditions/pcos/symptoms-causes/syc-20353439
Mayo Clinic Staff. (2018, December 1). Content
development policy—About this site—Mayo clinic. Mayo
Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/about-this-
site/product-development-policy
Mayo Clinic Staff. (2022, January 27). Privacy policy—
16
About this site—Mayo clinic. Mayo Clinic.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/about-this-site/privacy-
policy
National Institutes of Health. (2022, May 4). How to
evaluate health information on the internet: Questions
and answers.
https://ods.od.nih.gov/HealthInformation/How_To_Evalu
ate_Health_Information_on_the_Internet_Questions_and
_Answers.aspx
National Literacy Trust. (n.d.). What is literacy? National
Literacy Trust. Retrieved December 5, 2022, from
https://literacytrust.org.uk/information/what-is-literacy/
16
Readability test. (n.d.). WebFX. Retrieved December 6,
2022, from https://www.webfx.com/tools/read-able/
Sbaffi, L., & Rowley, J. (2017). Trust and credibility in
web-based health information: A review and agenda for
future research. Journal of Medical Internet Research,
19(6), e218. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7579
University of Maryland. (n.d.). What is a “good” source?
Determining the validity of evidence: Professional
writing program. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from
https://umd.instructure.com/courses/1082806/pages/what
-is-a-good-source-determining-the-validity-of-evidence
16
Whitchurch, M. (2022, July 6). Subject guides: Step-by-
step guide & research rescue: evaluating credibility.
https://guides.lib.byu.edu/c.php?g=216340&p=1428399
Wylie, A. (2021, August 1). What’s the latest U.S. literacy
rate? Wylie Communications, Inc.
https://www.wyliecomm.com/2021/08/whats-the-latest-u-
s-literacy-rate/
16
References continued
National Literacy Trust. (n.d.). What is literacy? National Literacy Trust. Retrieved December 5, 2022, from https://literacytrust.org.uk/information/what-
is-literacy/
Readability test. (n.d.). WebFX. Retrieved December 6, 2022, from https://www.webfx.com/tools/read-able/
Sbaffi, L., & Rowley, J. (2017). Trust and credibility in web-based health information: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Medical
Internet Research, 19(6), e218. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7579
University of Maryland. (n.d.). What is a “good” source? Determining the validity of evidence: Professional writing program. Retrieved December 7,
2022, from https://umd.instructure.com/courses/1082806/pages/what-is-a-good-source-determining-the-validity-of-evidence
Whitchurch, M. (2022, July 6). Subject guides: Step-by-step guide & research rescue: evaluating credibility.
https://guides.lib.byu.edu/c.php?g=216340&p=1428399
Wylie, A. (2021, August 1). What’s the latest U.S. literacy rate? Wylie Communications, Inc. https://www.wyliecomm.com/2021/08/whats-the-latest-u-s-
literacy-rate/
17
- Slide 1: Health Literacy Review of PCOS Educational Material
- Slide 2: Introduction - PCOS
- Slide 3: Intended Population
- Slide 4: Literacy vs. Health Literacy
- Slide 5: Interview
- Slide 6: Literacy and Health Literacy
- Slide 7: Readability Tool
- Slide 8: Credibility and Validity
- Slide 9: NIH Framework
- Slide 10: Date of Issue or Revision
- Slide 11: Credentials of Source
- Slide 12: Accuracy and Evidence
- Slide 13: Multimedia or Applications
- Slide 14: Protection and Security
- Slide 15: Summary
- Slide 16: References
- Slide 17: References continued