QUIZ 8
SEC
E TS FT s
SEAL PRESS
Copyright© 2008, 2017 by Susan Stryker
Hachette Book Group supports the right to free expression and the value of copyright. The purpose of copyright is to encourage writers and artists to produce the creative works that enrich our culture.
The scanning, uploading, and distribution of this book without permission is a theft of the author's intellectual property. If you would like permission to use material from the book (other than for review purposes), please contact permissions@ hbgusa.com. Thank you for your support of the author's rights.
Seal Press Hachette Book Group 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104 sealpress.com
Printed in the United States of America
Second Edition: November 2017
Published by Seal Press, an imprint of Perseus Books, LLC, a subsidiary of Hachette Book Group, Inc.
The Hachette Speakers Bureau provides a wide range of authors for speaking events. To find out more, go to www.hachettespeakersbureau.com or call (866) 376-6591.
The publisher is not responsible for websites (or their content) that are not owned by the publisher.
Print book interior design by Trish Wilkinson
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Stryker, Susan, author. Title: Transgender history: the roots of today's revolution I Susan Stryker. Description: Second edition. I Berkeley: Seal Press, 2017. I Revised edition
of the author's Transgender history, c2008. Identifiers: LCCN 20170259641ISBN9781580056892 (paperback) I ISBN
9781580056908 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Transgenderism-History. I Gender identity-History. I
Transgender people-History. Classification: LCC HQ77.9 .S77 2017 I DDC 306.76/8-dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017025964
LSC-C
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
1his book is dedicated to the trans people who the lives that made the history I've outlined
trans people, and our friends allies living
who continue to make history by advancing cause of social justice.
CHAPTER 5
THE MILLENNIAL WAVE
TH E TR EM EN D 0 US BURST of new trans gender activism that be-
gan around 1990 came on the heels of a generally dispiriting decade
or two in which transgender people made only small, erratic strides
toward a better collective existence. After years of court rulings in
which discrimination against transsexuals was found not to be il-
legal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (most notably in the
Supreme Court case Ulane v. Eastern Airlines, 1984), the 1989 de-
cision in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, which held sex stereotyping
to be illegal after the well-known accounting firm denied a part-
nership to Ann Hopkins for being "too masculine," opened up im-
portant lines of argumentation for trans rights in the decades ahead.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) passed in 1990 could
have been interpreted as covering transgender people, who, after all,
were considered to have an officially recognized psychopathological
debility, except for the fact that "transsexualism" was specifically
exempted from coverage. A number of states had come to recognize
legal change of sex on birth certificates, change of name and gender
on driver's licenses, and the rights of postoperative transsexuals to
marry in their current gender by the early 1990s. A few (Illinois,
Arizona, and Louisiana) had done so as early as the 1960s; several
151
152 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
others (Hawaii, California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Michigan,
New Jersey, Virginia, North Carolina, and Iowa) had followed
suit in the 1970s; and several more (Colorado, Arkansas, Georgia,
Missouri, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Wisconsin, and the Dis-
trict of Columbia) had done so by the 1980s. In addition, three
municipalities-Minneapolis, Minnesota; Harrisburg, Pennsylva-
nia; and Seattle, Washington-had enacted human and civil rights
protections for transgender people before the end of the 1980s. The
Southern California chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) had formed the Transsexual Rights Committee in 1980,
which had won a few modest victories pertaining to the treatment
of trans people by the Veterans Administration, the California
prison system, and government-funded vocational rehabilitation
programs, but the committee disbanded around 1983. Althea Gar-
rison was revealed as the first trans person to have been elected to
a state legislature when she won a seat in the Massachusetts state-
house in 1992; she was publicly outed two days later, effectively
ending her political career. Transgender-related policy, legislative,
and electoral victories were few and far between until the 1990s.
A few transgender organizations and service agencies had sol-
diered on through the bleakest stretches of the 1970s and 1980s.
The oldest ongoing transgender gathering in the nation, Fantasia
Fair, first met in Provincetown, Massachusetts, in 1975, under
the leadership of Ari Kane, a transgender mental health educator
who that same year also founded the Outreach Institute of Gen-
der Studies. The weeklong Fantasia Fair, a retreat initially geared
toward male-to-female cross-dressers, has tried with some success
to broaden its appeal to transsexuals and transmasculine people in
recent years. Boston's transgender community also spawned the
International Foundation for Gender Education (IFGE) in 1987 ·
Like Fantasia Fair, it initially focused on the needs and inter-
ests of MTF cross-dressers but aimed for an increasingly general
1he Millennial Wave 153
transgender constituency during the course of its existence. IFGE' s
magazin~, ~ape~try, was once the most widely circulated transgen- ~er pu~hcatton m the United States. The Janus Information Facil- •ty: which had taken over the education and outreach work of the Erickson Educational Foundation in the mt"d 1970 . If d - s, ttse cease operations in the mid- l 980s and transferred its mission to two
stalwarts of the transgender community, Jude Patton ~nd Joanna ~lark, who ran the cryptically named transsexual information dear- mghouse J2PC (derived from the initials of their names) in San
Juan Capistrano, California. Such small-scale, largely self-financed
homegrown resources, which enjoyed a few years of influen d · "fi ce an
s1gm cance before sinking beneath the waves of tt"me h . d , c aractenze the bulk of transgender community organizations into (and even beyond) the 1990s.
. But just as transgender social justice activism made gains in
th~ 1960s when transgender issues resonated with larger cultural shifts related to the rise of feminism the war 1"n v.· t al . ' e nam, sexu liberation, and youth countercultures, the transgender movement
bolt~d forwa~d again in the early 1990s for reasons having little to do directly wtth transgender issues. As suggested earlier, a variety of novel historical factors~the new political concept of h Al . . · queerness, t e
DS ep1dem1c, the rapid development of the Internet, the end of
t~e Cold War, the maturation of the first post-Baby Boomer gener- ation, and the calendrical millennial turn-all plav;ed th . .
. . . / etr parts m rev1tal1zmg transgender politics in the last decade of the twentieth
century. The wave of change that began at that time continued for a quarter century.
The New T ransgender and Queer Feminist Theory
Aroun~ 1990, transgender issues experienced a rapid evolution and expans10n-indeed, it's about this time that the word transgender
154 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
first started to acquire its current definition as a catchall term for
all nonnormative forms of gender expression and identity. V ~dams
of the word had been. popping up since the early 1960s in both
sexological literature and male cross-dresser communities, where
words such as "transgenderal,'' "transgenderist,'' and "transgende-
rism" were used by people . like Ari Kane and Virginia Prince to
describe individuals, such as themselves, who occupied a different
gender category. from either transvestites or transsexuals; Through-
out the 1970s and 1980s, a "transgenderist" was most lik~ly some- body born with a penis and who kept it in spite of living socially
as a woman. Trans activist Holly Boswell made an important con-
tribution toward the expansion of the term with her 1991 article
"The Transgender Alternative,'' published in the community-based
journal Chrysalis Quarterly, which claimed transgender was .a word
that "encompasses the whole spectrum" of gender diversity. a~d lumps together rather than splits apart the many subgroups withi~ a large, heterogeneous set of communities. Leslie Fei~berg ~a~e this expansive sense oftransgender a political charge with their mflu-
ential 1992 pamphlet, Transgender Liberation: A Movement Whose
Time Has Come. Feinberg, who had begun transitioning from fe-
male to male in the 1980s before deciding to live again as a mas-
culine woman with some surgical body alterations, became one of
the chief architects of the new transgender sensibility, as s/he strug-
gled to define and occupy a space on the borders and intersectio~s
of conventional gender categories. Their pamphlet took a Marxist
approach to the question of the social, political, and economic op-
pression of nonnormative expressions of gender, ands/he called. for
a "transgender" movement that would link many strugg.les agamst
specific gender-based oppressions together into one radical move-
ment. Feinberg' s autobiographically grounded novel Stone Butch
Blues (1991) communicated the emotional flavor of hir transgender
vision to a large and appreciative international audience.
Ihe Millennial Wave 155
Yet another contribution to the redefinition of transgender came
in the form of a 1992 academic article by Sandy Stone, "The 'Em-
pire' Strikes Back: A Posttranssexual Manifesto.~' Stone, who had , first gained notoriety in transgender circles as the male-to-female
transsexual recording engineer who inspired ] anice Raymond to
lead a boycott of the all-women Olivia Records collective, had since
gotten a PhD in cultural studies, and she made brilliant use of some
of the new theories of gender just then beginning to circulate in the
academy, which she used to help shift the old trans-exclusionary
feminist debates into a productive new register. In calling for "post-
transsexual" theorizing capable of reframing the common narratives
through which trans people were marginalized, Stone helped give
the nascent "transgender" movement an intellectual as well as a po- litical agenda.
There is more than one intellectual genealogy of what came to be
called "queer studies." One story has it emerging from the work of
literary critics Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Michael Moon at Duke
University. Stone, however, was more grounded in the version of
queer feminism that blossomed in Santa Cruz, where she earned
her PhD at the University of California while studying under femi-
nist science studies scholar Donna Haraway. West Coast queer the-
ory was more indebted to feminists of color, primarily the writers
in the anthology This Bridge Called My Back, and most especially to
Gloria Anzaldua' s Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. Two
crucial insights in this body of work were to be found in its in-
tersectional analyses of race/class/gender/sexuality oppressions-no
one of which could be privileged over the others in the lives of the
women writing about their situations~and in its attention to "hy-
bridity." White feminism often (and often unconsciously) claimed
its moral strength based on some concept of "purity" -notably
(especially in the first wave) some notion of female sexual purity,
but also, more abstractly, in the second wave, on the idea of an
156 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
essential womanhood to be recovered or restored from the taint of
patriarchal pollution. In contrast, Anzaldua' s brand of feminism
valued the power to be found in being mixed, in crossing borders,
of having no one clear category to fit into-of being essel\_tially im-
pure. Haraway drew on this evolving frame of reference in her fa- mous "Cyborg Manifesto," which described a "post-gender" world
of "technocultural" bodies, and added machine/human and ani-
mal/human to the kinds of boundary and mixing questions with
which feminism should be concerned. Stone's "posttranssexual
manifesto," attentive as it was to technologically altered transgender
bodies, was deeply influenced by Haraway' s approach to the inter-
sectionality of gender, embodiment, and technology. However, it
also drew from another new way of thinking about gender then be-
ing explored by another feminist faculty member at the University
of California, Santa Cruz, Teresa de Lauretis, who coined the term
"queer studies" for a conference she organized under that name in
Santa Cruz in 1991. The new "queer" version of gender espoused by de Lauretis and
other like-minded feminist scholars, which de Lauretis laid out
most succinctly in her essay "Technologies of Gender," discarded
the older feminist idea that gender was merely repressive-that it
was only a system for holding women down, turning them into
second-class citizens, exploiting their labor, and controlling their re-
productive capacities. Without denying that gender systems indeed
produced systematic inequalities for women, the new q\.ieer take on
gender also talked about gender's productive power-how "woman"
was also a cultural or linguistic "site" or "location" that its occu-
pants identified themselves with, understood themselves through,
and acted from. The new queer feminism drew heavily from French
philosopher Michel Foucault's concept of social power as decen-
tralized and distributed rather than flowing from a single source;
1he Millennial Wave 157
that is, that each of us has a power particular to our situation and
that power is not just something vested "up there" somewh:re in
the law or the military or capital or the ''patriarchy ,, Q fc . . . . ueer em1- _n,1s~ r.e1magined the status "woman" as not simply a condition of v1ct1m1zation to be escaped from, and it reconceptualized gender
as a network of "relations of power" that, like language, we don't
e~er .get ou~side .of but always express ourselves through and work w1thm-a s1tuat10n that gives feminist women a "d al . . " d (( . u v1s10n an split subjectivity.,, Sometimes womanhood is a binding-in-place
that needs to be resisted and worked against, and sometimes d
Lauretis said, women want womanhood to stick to them "l'k ' e 'lk d ,, 1 e a wet s1 ress.
TRANSSUBJECTIVITY AND REALITY HACKING
A _1995 issue of Wired magazine included an interview with trans th~ or~st S~~dy Stone, who has had an amazingly varied career Amon~ ot er t ings, she has con~ucted early research on digital tele~hones at ~/~)Labs :n~ on neural implants for the National Institutes for Health
' ":or e . as sound engineer for Jimi Hendrix, helped found the womens music scene while working at Olivia Records (where she was
~h_e ta) rget of a transphobic boycott by trans-exclusionary lesbian fem- inists and earned a PhD . H" t f
'. . in is ory o Consciousness at the Universit of Cal1forn1a, Sa~ta Cruz. Her article "The 'Empire' Strikes Back: A PosZ ~anssexual Manifesto," a scathing rebuttal to Janice Raymond's The 1 ranssexual Empire hel d I h h .
, pe aunc t e new interdisciplinary field of transg~nder ~tudies. Stone taught for many years at the Universit of Texas in Austin, where she established the Advanced Communica~on } ech~ology L~boratory (ACT Lab). Most of what Sandy and the Wired interviewer sa~d to each other wound up on the cutting room floor- the convers~t1on below draws on different parts of the conversation than that which was ultimately published.
continues
158 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
,v TRANSSUBJECTIVITY AND REALITY HACKING continued
Wired: You worked in technical fields for many years but now study how that work is done by others. What led you to cultural
studies of science?
Stone: It gave me that common language I'd always dreamed
of. I could bring to it much of my experience with neurolo~y and telephony and sound recording and ~omputer progra~-
. my studies of classics, and my brief encounters with ming, h" f critical theory. I could find ways in which all of those t 1ngs it
together. It started with a piece called "Sex and Death am~ng the Cyborgs." I set out to write an essay on data com~ress1on and wound up writing about phone sex. Sex usually 11rw~lves as many of the senses as possible-taste, touch, s~~ll, sight, hearing. Phone sex workers translate all those mod~lit1es o.f ex- perience into sound, then boil that down into a series of h1~hly compressed tokens. They squirt those tokens down a vo1ce-
grade line and someone at the other end just adds_ water, so
to speak, to reconstitute the tokens into a fully detail1~d set of images and interactions in multiple sensory modes. Sex and
Death among the Cyborgs" was an attempt to explore bound-
aries and prostheses and everything that interests me now.
Wired: What do you mean when you say "boundaries and
prostheses"?
Stone: Subjective boundaries and bodily boundari~s. 'Vl!e're. a culture that likes to preserve the illusion that they re fixed 1~ place. But they move around all the time. For example, where _s
the boundary of an individual human body? Is it skin? Is it
clothes? It's different in different circumstances. I use Stephen
Hawking as an example of how body boundary issues inter~ct with technology. Because Hawking can't speak, he le~tures ~1th a computer-generated voice. Hawking's comput:nzed ~01c: generator is a prosthesis, from the Greek word for extension.
continues
The Millennial Wave 159
It's an extension of his person. It extends his will across the
boundaries of flesh and machinery, from the medium of air mol-
ecules in motion to the medium of electromagnetic force.
Wired: It seems to me that being transsexual significantly in- forms your work. Transsexuality could be considereq a form of reality hacking-you "change sex" by using for your- own pur- poses the codes that regulate how we understand the mean- ing of identity through the body. Hormones and surgery are prostheses that extend a sense of self into a set of physical signs that mean identity in social interactions. Experiencing the transformation of your body through transsexual technologies gives one an acute sense of the issues that come up in trying to understand virtual systems, cyberspace, interface, agency, interaction, and identity. It's hard for many people to grasp this aspect of transsexuality because of the way it's been stigma- tized, pathologized, exoticized, and eroticized.
Stone: I want to move away from the sexuality model for very
much those reasons-that's why I want to talk about transsub-
jectivity rather than transsexuality. This term better helps us
see that the body is an instrument for involvement with others.
When I wrote in an essay called "A Posttranssexual Manifesto"
that transsexuality was a genre rather than a gender, I meant
that the body is a site for the play of language, a generator of symbolic exchange.
Without saying so in quite so many words, de Lauretis and
other queer feminists found a useful way to acknowledge that
feminist women could be committed to feminist politics with-
out therefore necessarily being forced to concede that "woman"
was nothing more than a patriarchal trap for female bodies. This
opened a line of argument that led directly to Stone's essay, which
called upon transse~ual people simultaneously to resist the old ways
160 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
that medical science had encouraged them to behave as the price
for providing services-creating false biographies to conceal their
sex change from others, for example, or trying to pass as a cisgen-
der person-while also soliciting them to speak out in a "hetero-
glossic," Babel-like profusion of tongues about all the imaginable
genres of gender difference there could be, if only the homogeniz-
ing tendencies of the medically dominated discourse of td.nssexu-
ality were shattered. In doing so, trans people could simultaneously
circumvent the pernicious perspective that had become entrenched
over the preceding decade, that transsexuals were either duplicitous,
dupes of the patriarchy, or mentally ill. All genders-all genres of
personhood-would be on the same plane.
Two other developments internal to feminism shook open
spaces within political activism, scholarship, and community for-
mation and allowed transgender feminism to expand and grow in
the 1990s. The first was the so-called sex wars, a pivotal episode of
which was the 1982 Barnard conference on women, which aired
long-standing differences within feminism about female sexuality.
Fierce debates raged around the topics of pornography, prostitu-
tion, and consensual sadomasochism. Could there be feminist po-
sitions on these issues that were not simply condemnatory; that is,
could there be feminist pornography, feminist sex work, feminist
practices of sexual kink, or were such ideas rooted in "internalized
misogyny" and did they constitute "violence against women"? The
"sex-positive" and "sex-negative" camps were every bit as polar-
ized as those names suggest, and the sex wars-like earlier disputes
within feminism about heterosexism, class, and color-further frag-
mented a movement that was never as homogeneous as some femi-
nists wanted to believe.
The "sex-negative" camp consigned cross-dressing and transsex-
ual genital modification to the same discredited territory occupied
by fetish, prostitution, incest, and rape, while the "sex-positive"
The Millennial Wave 161
camp resisted the idea that some sexual practices condemned by
mainstream society were intrinsically antifeminist or that criticizing
some aspects of those practices necessarily entailed a condemnation
of the women who practiced them. The warring perspectives are
succinctly summarized in the names of two feminist publications:
Off Our Backs, which advocated a resistance to sexisi_oppression of women, and On Our Backs, a frank celebration of female sexual
pleasure. Some of the same arguments that the sex-positive femi-
nists made in defense of women who take money in exchange for
sex or who engage in bedroom bondage scenarios or rape fantasies
or intergenerational desire would open a path whereby transgender
practices and perspectives could similarly contest the censure of cer- tain kinds of feminists.
Sex-positive feminism had the disadvantage, however, of re-
garding being trans as an erotic practice rather than an expression
of gender identity. Feminist anthropologist Gayle Rubin's influ-
ential article "Thinking Sex," first delivered at the Barnard confer-
ence and published in the anthology of conference-related work,
Pleasure and Danger, clearly demonstrates this point. In charting out the "moral sex hierarchy" shared by "sex-negative" feminism
and mainstream US society, Rubin distinguishes between forms of
sexuality clearly labeled "good" (such as reproductive heterosexual
monogamy) and those clearly labeled "bad" (such as fetishistic
cross-dressing, transsexuality, or street prostitution), and she identi-
fies a "major area of contest" between these poles that encompasses
sexual practices that are morally ambiguous within the dominant
culture (such as promiscuous heterosexuality or long-term, stable,
romantic homosexual couplings). Through time, a practice might
move from a very marginalized position, to one where its status
was contested, to one where it was largely accepted-exactly the
path followed by homosexuality in the aftermath of the gay libera- tion movement.
162 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
One of the main goals of Rubin's argument was to challenge the
way that some schools of feminism (those drawing on the "purity"
tradition) set up hierarchies that placed their own perspective at the
top and claimed the power to judge and condemn other positions
they deemed morally suspect. Rubin's article noted how early sec-
ond wave feminism floundered when it tried to apply the economic
concept of "class" to the category "woman," which has many non-
economic attributes, and succeeded only when it developed a set of
analytical tools that were specific to the situation of women-that
is to say, a gender analysis. She then proposed that feminism, as the
study of gender, was in turn not a sufficient frame of reference for
the analysis of sexuality, and she proposed a new "sexuality stud-
ies" that, without abandoning feminism any more than feminism
had abandoned economic concerns, would take up a new set of
questions about sex. This argument eventually came to be seen as
foundational to the intellectual· project of queer studies. In making
that important argument, however, Rubin clearly categorized trans-
gender practices as sexual or erotic acts rather than expressions of
gender identity or sense of self. As a revitalized transgender move-
ment began to gather force in the early 1990s, it posed a challenge
to the new queer theory similar to the one po'sed by sexuality to
feminism: it asked whether the framework of queer sexuality could
adequately account for transgender phenomena, or whether a new,
additional frame of analysis was also required. These are the ques-
tions that led, in the years ahead, to the development of the new
interdisciplinary academic field of transgender studies.
No account of the new transgender movement and its relation
to· feminism in the early 1990s would be complete without men-
tioning the impact of philosopher Judith Butler's work. In her 1990
book, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, But-
ler promoted the concept of "gender performativity," which be-
came central to the self-understandings of many transgender people
The Millennial Wave 163
(along with many cisgender people, too). The main idea is that "be-
ing something" consists of "doing it," a point often misunderstood
in some ·quarters of the transgender community as an assertion that
gender is a merely a performance and therefore not real. For trans
p~ople, who often suffer a great deal to actualize for others the real- ity of their gender identifications, the idea that gender w.:as a game
with no skin in it, just a wardrobe full of possible gender costumes
to be put on or taken off at will, felt galling. But that actually was
never Butler's point; rather, it was that the reality of gender for
everybody is the "doing of it." Rather than being an objective quality
of the body (defined by sex), gender is constituted by all the innu-
merable acts of performing it: how we dress, move, speak, touch,
look. Gender is like a language we use to communicate ourselves to
others and to understand ourselves. The implication of this argu-
ment is that transgender genders are as real as any others, and they
are achieved in the same fundamental way.
Butler clarified and extended some of her arguments in her
next book, Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex. "
She argued there that the category of sex, which is conventionally
considered the physical foundation of gender difference (that is,
male and female biology respectively generate the social roles and
personal identities "man" and "woman"), is actually produced by
how culture understands gender. The way a gender system points
to the body as a form of evidence that proves its truth is just a dis-
course, a story we tell about what the evidence supplied by the body
means. Even what "counts" as sex is up for grabs. This discursive
truth achieves its reality by being perpetually "cited" (referred to
over and over again in medicine, law, psychiatry, media, everyday
conversation, and so forth) in ways that, taken all together, make
it real in practice, in the performative sense mentioned above. This
way of thinking about sex, gender, and reality opened up for theo-
rists within the new transgender movement the prospect that new
164 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
"truths" transgender experience, new ways of narrating re-
lationship between gendered sense of self, social role, and embod-
could begin to be told-precisely what Sandy Stone had
called for in her "posstranssexual" manifesto.
The shifting paradigms of gender and sexuality that emerged from
the intellectual workplaces of academe by the 1990s were informed
by the course of the AIDS epidemic, which also played an import-
ant role in revitalizing the transgender movement. From a public
health perspective, transgender populations had come to be seen as
"vulnerable" populations-ones more prone to infection because
of the confluence of poverty, social stigma, job discrimination,
survival prostitution, fewer educational resources, lack of access to
medical information or health care, and other contributing factors.
To prevent vulnerable populations from becoming vectors of in-
fection for other larger and healthier populations, AIDS funding
entities directed money to "culturally competent" prevention and
harm-reduction strategies aimed at trans people. AIDS funding
thus became an important mechanism for bringing needed social
and financial resources to trans communities. Particularly in com-
munities of color, AIDS agencies and service organizations became
centers of transgender activism, hosting support groups, facilitating
community gatherings, and providing employment to trans people
engaged in health outreach and peer support work. Even strictly so-
cial events for trans people who were not HIV-positive were some-
times financially supported through AIDS funding, with the idea
that such events could help provide important safer-sex education
opportunities and could help build self-esteem and cultural pride
that would encourage healthy decision making about potentially
risky behaviors. Several organizations and programs established
1he Millennial Wave 165
in San Francisco in early to
trend, including Projecto ContraSIDA por Vida, Asian and
Pacific Islander Wellness Center, and transgender program at
Brothers Network, an agency primarily serving African American men and transgender women.
history of the AIDS epidemic significantly resh~ped sexual politics. When epidemic first emerged in the United
States, it surfaced among gay men who were mostly One
early name for the syndrome was in fact GRID-Gay-Related Im-
mune Deficiency. But epidemiologists and public health workers
knew that mysterious new disease was not confined to white
gay populations and, however much it affected them, to paint the
immune deficiency syndrome as "gay related" could serve only to
AIDS prevention and educational outreach funding accelerated transgender community formation, especially in communities of color. (PHOTO CREDIT: GLBT HISTORICAL SOCIETY.)
166 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
impede an adequate public health response. AIDS also affected he-
mophiliacs, injection drug users, and· Haitian immigrants in dis-
proportionate numbers, regardless of their sexual orientation or
gender. It soon became clear that AIDS could pass from person
to person through heterosexual intercourse and that in fact it was
the exchange of bodily fluids, rather than the type of sexual act per
se, that created risk of infection. It also quickly became clear that
the prevalence of HIV infection was not uniformly distributed but
rather was structured at the population level by racism and poverty:
poor people of color, particularly African American people, were far
more likely to·. become infected and far less likely to be able to ac-
cess the best lifo-prolonging health care. Black transgender women
living at the intersection of transphobia, misogyny, homophobia,
racism, poverty, and higher rates of incarceration-particularly if
they were involved in commercial sex work-were especially vul-
nerable. The AIDS health crisis thus required gay men, and many
lesbians, to rethink the cultural politics of homosexuality and the
ways in which homosexual communities related to and intersected
with broader social structures~in the same way that it required
many nonhomosexuals to relate differently to gay communities
and subcultures. To adequately respond to the AIDS epidemic de-
manded a new kind of alliance politics in which specific communi-
ties came together across the dividing lines of race and gender, class
and nationality, citizenship and sexual orientation. It also required
gay liberation politics and feminist public health activism to take
transgender issues far more seriously than they had in the past.
The name for this new kind of unabashedly pro-gay, nonsepa-
ratist, antiassimilationist alliance politics to· combat AIDS, which
did not organize itself around identity categories but instead took
aim at the overarching social structures that marginalized those in-
fected by HIV, was queer. The new politics resonated with the new
intellectual paradigms taking shape in the academy, but it drew its
The Millennial Wave 167
forces from unapologetic, confrontational, and media-savvy pro-
test groups such as ACT UP (AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power),
which reclaimed an old epithet for gay people, "queer," and turned
it into an in-your-face "So what?" retort to anti-AIDS prejudice.
ACT UP was one of the most successful radical direct action polit-
ical groups in US history, successfully taking on a crim!nally neg-
ligent federal government under President Ronald Reagan, as well
as the multi-billion-dollar pharmaceuticals industry, to develop
treatments, fund programs, challenge prejudice, and save lives. This
newly politicized sense of "queer" first appeared on flyers handed
out by militant AIDS organizations at New York's Gay Pride
march in June'1990, which were emblazoned with the headline
"Queers Read This!" and urged "an army oflovers" to take to the
streets. Within days, and for many months, autonomous "Queer
Nation" chapters started springing up in cities all across the United
States, just as had happened with the Gay Liberation Front in the
1960s. In the two short years that encompassed its waxing and
waning, 1990-1992, Queer Nation transformed public perceptions
of AIDS and homosexuality and shifted internal gay, lesbian, and
bisexual community politics in ways that allowed transgender issues
to come back into the community's dialogue-just as transgender
issues were simultaneously reentering feminism with a new voice.
LGB(T) (and Sometimes I)
The most direct link between the new queer politics and the trans-
gender movement was the formation in 1992 of Transgender
Nation, organized by Anne Ogborn as a focus group within the
San Francisco chapter of Queer Nation. QN-SF was a "group of
groups" that met monthly so that members of its constituent groups
could share ideas, publicize activities, and gather support from other
groups for their own actions. Individual groups within QN varied
168 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
from the women's focus group LABIA (Lesbians
Action) to SHOP (Suburban Homosexual Project),
actions varied from staging queer kiss-ins at shopping malls to play-
ing a lead in massive demonstrations against . Gulf "W_ar. ~f
there was an underlying unity to QN's disparate action strategies, it
was to be found in the sense of urgency driven by the AIDS crisis
and in the conviction that queer people needed to engage imme-
diately in practices that would disrupt the smooth funct~oning of
the heterosexist state and its deadly indifference to queer lives. One
strategy was simply to erupt into visibility in the everyday spaces of
city life through how one dressed. Typical QN styles included (once shocking, now thoroughly commodified and depoliticized) bl~ck
leather biker jackets, Doc Martens boots, T-shirts with provocative
or cryptic political messages printed on them, tattoos, facial pierc-
ings, and copious amounts of Day Glo-colored stickers pla~tere.d on
any available surface (including the backs of black leather biker jack-
ets), with slogans such as "We Are Everywhere" and "We're Here,
We're Queer, Get Used to It." Anne Ogborn had seen a Queer
Nation member at a large public protest wearing another popular
sticker-"Trans Power/Bi Power/Queer Nation"-with the words
"Trans Power" torn off. She asked the woman wearing the sticker if
those words had been accidentally or purposefully removed and was
told that they had been deliberately ripped away because the wearer
didn't consider trans people to be part of her queer movement. Og-
born went to the next monthly QN meeting to protest transphobia
within the group and, in typical QN fashion, was invited to orga-
nize a focus group devoted to transgender concerns.
The announcement in San Francisco's gay and lesbian press of
T ransgender Nation's formation set off a firestorm of protest in the
editorial pages, most of it authored by the same now-aging subset of
lesbian feminists who had attacked Beth Elliott at the West Coast
Lesbian Feminist Conference nearly twenty years earlier. Although
Ihe Millennial Wave 169
term (trans-exclusionary radical feminist) not yet
been coined, is precisely the mind-set that informed the lesbian
feminist attack on Transgender Nation. What was different time around was that
antitransgender rhetoric had come to be seen as a reactionary rather
eration of post-Baby Boom-
ers was reaching adulthood,
a generation whose political
sensibilities had been formed
by the feminist sex wars, the
AIDS crisis, and emerging
theoretical perspectives on
the sex-gender relationship.
Many people who embraced
the queer vision of the early
1990s readily accepted trans-
gender as part of the "anti-
heteronormative" mix. Of
course, not all self-identified
queers were trans inclusive,
nor were all transgender peo-
ple queer friendly. But a large
and previously nonexistent
area of overlap between trans-
gender and queer community
formations quickly emerged.
a progressive stance. A new gen-
OPE.NING RECEPTION Monday May l 7-lOpm Readings by James Green, David Harrison, Susan Stryker
ar 7:30pm and 8:30pm 848 Community Art Space • For information: 4151765-7658
848 Divisadero (between Fulton & McAllisrer) in San Francisco Opening Reception Admission: $5 (donation)
Gallery also OPEN: May l- June I, Sundays l-5pm
Loren Cameron s Body Alchemy was a prominent part of the new wave of visi- bility for transgender men in the 1990s. (PHOTO CREDIT: LOREN CAMERON.)
Transgender Nation erupted with a bang in late 1992, just as QN
was falling apart. It initially drew scores of people to its meetings,
although it quickly dwindled to a small core of regulars. During
its brief existence, its members staged an attention-grabbing protest
at the 1993 annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Associa-
tion that landed three activists in jail; provided courtroom support
170 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
for transgender women arrested on sex-work charges; inspired the
formation of a few Transgender Nation chapters in other cities; in-
formed the political sensibilities of an early transgender studies ar-
ticle on "transgender rage"; and made the rounds of LGB groups
in San Francisco, demanding that they take a $tand on transgender
inclusion (thereby demonstrating whether those groups were part
of the new queer movement or the old gay and lesbian movement).
During the next few years, members of variously constituted
queer groups and organizations in cities across the United States
replicated those lively and sometimes heated debates about the re-
lationship between transgender and lesbian, gay, and bisexual com-
munities. The 1993 March on Washington for Lesbian, Gay, and
Bi Equal Rights became. a particular flashpoint for trans-inclusion
struggles after some local organizing committees voted to add
"transgender" to. the title of the march, but a trans-inclusion res-
olution f~iled to pass at the national organizing committee level.
Members of T ransgender Na ti on who thereafter showed up in
Washington, DC, to protest the march introduced their new hy-
brid style of in-your-face queer/transgender politics to transgender
and gay communities alike-and in doing so helped accelerate sub-
sequent transgender organizing nationwide. By 1994, transgender
people played a much larger role in the twenty-fifth anniversary
commemoration of the Stonewall Riots, although they were still
relegated to the "alternative" march and rally rather than the "of-
ficial" one. By 1995, however, many formerly "gay and lesbian" or
"gay, lesbian, and bisexual" organizations and events were begin-
ning to add the T to their names. In the decades ahead, any number
of other initials representing other identities were added to the al-
phabet soup, and their order was perpetually rearranged.
This shift in nomenclature toward an "LGBT +" community,
rather than a "queer" one, marked the beginning of a new phase
in the social history of sexual and gender identity politics ·in the
The Millennial Wave 171
United States. It represented a retreat from the more radical con-
cept of alliance, resistance, and rebellion by different groups against
the same oppressive structures in the dominant culture and the
adoption instead of a neoliberal model of minority tolerance and
i~~lusion-wh~~h sometimes amounted to little more than a "po- litically correct gesture of token inclusion for transgend~r people. Although some "LGBT" organizations genuinely address~d trans- gender concerns in addition to those of sexual orientation minori-
~ies, e~orts at transgender inclusion often failed to grasp the ways m which transgender identity differed from sexual orientation and
misconceptualized how they were alike.
Most transgender advocates used the word transgender as an ad-
jec~i~e to describe a way of being a man or a woman, or as a way of re~i~tmg categorization by those labels. Like class or race or physical
ability, transgender functioned for them as a descriptive term that
cut across the sexual orientation categories, rather than as a noun
describing a separate "species" of sexual identity. A transgender man could be gay or straight or bi, in other words, just as he could
be black or poor or disabled. Many cisgender gays and lesbians,
however, regarded the T precisely as a new species of sexual identity
appended to their own. They considered trans people to be, first
and foremost, trans people rather than members of the L G , , or B groups who also just happened to be trans. This construction of
transgender identity as a noun rather than an adjective-as a kind
of person rather than a descriptive quality attached to another cate-
~ory of personhood-had the unfortunate effect of reinforcing the idea that. homosexuality and bisexuality were by definition "gen-
der normative" and that anyone who deviated from the conven-
~ional definitions of "man" and "woman" automatically belonged m the transgender category. This way of thinking about transgender
tended to reinforce the similarities between homosexual cultures
and mainstream society based on shared concepts of gender and to
172 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
perpetuate the marginalization of transgender people, within both
the mainstream society and the LGBT movement.
One other related development in the early 1990s that de-
serves attention is the emergence of an intersex political move-
ment. Cheryl Chase founded the lntersex Society of North America
(ISNA) in 1993 with the single-minded goal of ending the practice
of performing pediatric genital surgeries on babies b<?rn with am-
biguous genitalia (clearly neither male nor female)-as had been
done to Chase herself. Chase had been assigned male at birth, but
a few years later doct~rs reversed their decision, told her parents to raise her as a girl, and performed surgery to reduce what they had
formerly considered to be a very small penis to an "appropriate"
size for what they now considered to be a too-big clitoris. Chase
did not remember her early childhood gender reassignment, which
is exactly what the medical professionals thought best in terms of
helping intersex youth to develop a "normal" gender in their med-
ically assigned sex. But rather than helping Chase feel normal, the
nonconsensual genital surgeries, which severely compromised her
sexual functioning later in life, left her feeling mutilated and freak-
ish. When she discovered as an adult what had happened to her
as a child, and that it had deliberately been kept secret from her,
Chase felt as if her entire life had been built on a lie. Nothing had
prepared her to accept either her intersex body or the surgeries that
tried in vain to normalize it within the gender binary. After briefly
contemplating suicide, Chase resolved instead that no other chil-
dren should suffer what she herself had experienced. She moved
from Japan, where she ran a computer technology company, to San
Francisco, to learn what she could from the new queer and trans-
gender activism that had erupted there.
The result was ISNA, which made tremendous progress in
changing the way that the medical establishment pays attention to
ambiguous genitalia, in providing peer support for intersex people
The Millennial Wave 173
and their families, and in educating the general public about inter-
sexuality. Chase initially considered intersex politics to be related
to queer and transgender politics not only because they all chal-
lenged heterosexist and gender-normative biases backed by medical
authority, or because they called for the transformation of some of
the same powerful social institutions, but also because the practice
of normativizing genital surgery was such a visceral example of the
idea that beliefs about gender actually produced the sex of the body,
rather than the other way around. Bodies that did not originally
fit the gender binary were literally cut to fit into it, and the process
whereby the operation attempted to produce "normal" bodies as a
result was rendered invisible, and its recipients silenced-just as the
medical establishment had attempted to do with transsexuals. ISNA
also offered a feminist perspective on intersex surgeries. The vast ma-
jority of children with ambiguous genitalia are eventually assigned
as female, because surgeons find it far easier to remove "excess" tis-
sue than to build up new body structures for genitals deemed in-
sufficient for a normal male appearance. This fixation on penis size,
coupled with a cultural devaluation of the feminine that already
conceived of women as "lacking" what men have, conspires to inflict
unnecessary surgeries on intersex children. As feminist sociologist
Suzanne Kessler noted in her work on the biomedical ethics of inter-
sex surgeries, ambiguous genitalia are rarely dangerous for a baby's
health, but they are very dangerous for that baby's culture.
By 2006, ISNA had been largely successful in challenging the
idea that genital surgeries performed on infants represented "best
practices" in intersex care, and in reframing medical practice through
the age-old wisdom that says "first do no harm," to advocate for a
cautious wait-and-see approach that would create greater opportuni-
ties for the intersex person's consent to irrevocable and life-changing
actions. That year, a "Consensus Statement on the Management
of lntersex Disorders" was published in the journal Pediatrics that
174 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
incorporated much of what ISNA had been proposing over· the pre-
ceding decade. In 2007, to the outrage of many intersex activists,
ISNA essentially abandoned its queer, trans, and feminist ~liance
politics to join with medical service providers in the new Accord
Alliance, in which intersex advocates and medical experts would
jointly work to implement the recommendations of the "Consensus
Statement." Consequently, ISNA endorsed the use of the medical
nomenclature "Disorders of Sex Development" (DSD), distanced
itself from "intersex" as an overtly and counterproductively polit-
icized identity term, declared "mission accomplished," and closed
its doors in 2008. Its work is continued by the Alliance Accord,
InterACT for Intersex Youth (formerly Advocates for Informed
Choice), and the Organisation Internationale des Intersexues (OII),
a decentralized global network of local, regional, and national inter-
sex organizations. Although contemporary intersex and transgender
activism have common roots in queer, trans, and feminist politics of
the early 1990s, and still sometimes intersect and overlap with one
another, they have trended in different directions.
Forging a National T ransgender Movement
T ransgender communities, organizations, and activist struggles
grew in so many different directions during the 1990s, in so many
different locations, that it's impossible to place all the developments
into a single chronological narrative. Much of this proliferation
can be attributed to the Internet. Although the Internet had been
around for a long time by then, its use had been mostly confined
to scientists and computer hobbyists, and its content was largely
limited to email and electronic bulletin boards, until Netscape in-
troduced Navigator, the first user-friendly web browser, in 1994.
The Internet and World Wide W eh became ubiquitous seemingly
The Millennial Wave 175
instantly thereafter, radically transforming communication, com-
merce, media, and culture in ways that are still evolving, and which
are hard to grasp for those who have grown up afterward. But one
immediate consequence was that many geographically dispersed
and socially isolated individuals could now connect online with
relative ease. Gradually, a far-flung network of new transgender
groups and campaigns began to influence one another, forging a
more coherent national perspective.
AEGIS (American Educational Gender Information Service) was
founded by Dallas Denny in the Atlanta, Georgia, metropolitan area
in 1990. The seemingly indefatigable Denny was one of the most in-
fluential trans activists of the decade, publishing Chrysalis Quarterly,
establishing a significant archive of historical trans community ma-
terials, and pioneering the development of online resources for trans
people. Denny played a leading role in organizing several import-
ant conferences and annual gatherings, perhaps most notably the
first Southern Comfort transgender conference in Atlanta in 1991, a
large-scale version of the same sorts of activities that have long char-
acterized local transgender group meetings: guest speakers, work-
shops, discussions, entertainment, and socializing. Over the years,
that event grew into one of the largest regular transgender gatherings
in the country. It provided the setting for the award-winning 2001
documentary film Southern Comfort, which chronicled the final years
in the life of trans man Robert Eads, a conference regular, who died
of ovarian cancer after being unable to get health care because of
his transgender status. Southern Comfort moved to Ft. Lauderdale,
Florida, for its 2015 and 2016 conferences, after which it suspended
operations. AEGIS morphed into GEA (Gender Education Associ-
ation) around 1995, before gradually going dormant as more and
more of its agenda to foster transgender depathologization and com-
munity empowerment seemed to have been met.
176 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
One of the first transgender-related events to break out, into na-
tional prominence in the early days of the new transgender move-
ment, even before the Internet took off, was the expulsion of Nancy
Jean Burkholder, a trans woman, from the Michigan Womyn's
Music Festival in 1991. The long-running festival, which combined
outdoor camping with days and days of musical performances, and
which advertised itself as a women-only event, had a tacit policy of
not welcoming transgender women on the grounds that they were
not "womyn-born-womyn" -that is, because trans women did not
share the experience of being raised as girls, and had experienced
early socialization as boys, they therefore could never really under-
stand what it meant to be a woman under patriarchy or appreciate
the need for women-only spaces. Burkholder, who claimed not to
have known of_the policy that excluded transgender women (but
which still accommodated the participation of transgender men,
implying that they were really cisgender women) was deeply trou-
bled by her expulsion and began speaking out in queer and trans-
gender publications. Her case quickly came to function as a litmus
test for whether "queer" was indeed transgender inclusive and for
which side of feminism had won the sex wars. In subsequent years,
transgender activists and allies organized a "Camp Trans" near the
music festival grounds to offer ongoing protest, educational out-
reach, dialogue, alternative community formations, and network-
ing opportunities to .combat feminist transphobia. The debates
about transgender participation at the Michigan Womyn's Music
Festival remained an important touchstone in continually evolving
queer, transgender, and feminist political discussions for nearly a
quarter century, until the festival finally folded in 2015, without
ever formally lifting its "womyn-born-womyn" policy.
In 1992 in Houston, longtime transgender activist and attorney
Phyllis Frye organized the first of six annual transgender law confer-
ences, formally titled the International Conference on T ransgender
The Millennial Wave 177
Law and Employment Policy. The published proceedings of the
co~f~rence did much to inspire a new burst of transgender legal ~cnvism and to connect activists at the national level. Frye was also mstrumental in orchestrating a transgender contingent at the 1993
~GB March on Washington and in beginning to lobby federal leg- islators on transgender legal and policy issues-everrthing from
health care coverage for transgender medical procedur~s to rules gov~rning state-issued IDs to employment nondiscrimination pro- tection to hate crimes legislation. Maryland's Jessica Xavier, who
served on the local host committee for the 1993 march, also took
an act~ve role in transgender political lobbying in the early 1990s, f~undmg both the Washington, DC, chapter of Transgender Na- tion and ~rg~izing another national transgender political lobbying group, Its Time America. Another trans activist from the nation's
capital, Martine Rothblatt, drew parallels between race-based and
transgender oppressions with her 1996 book, The Apartheid of Sex.
Rothblatt, a highly successful telecommunications lawyer who
founded Sirius satellite radio, went on to make a second fortune
i~ pharmaceutical manufacturing, before turning her attention to life-extension and immortality research (and, in the process, be-
coming one of two known transgender billionaires). ,
In New York, activist Riki Wilchins cited lesbian and feminist history-specifically the Lavender Menace and Radicalesbians-
when she launched the T ransexual Menace in 1994 wh d , ose tra e- mark image was a Goth-styled black T-shirt emblazoned with
the group's name in blood-dripping red letters. Wilchins and the
Menace garnered unprecedented media attention by sponsoring
vi~ils outside of courthouses where cases involving antitransgender crimes were being tried, most notably the 1993 rape and murder of
transmasculine teen Brandon Teena in Nebraska, and they became
the subject of iconic gay liberation filmmaker Rosa Von Praun-
heim' s 1996 documentary Transexual Menace. Wilchi~s, who did
178 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
more than any other trans activist in the 1990s to shift the move-
ment away from unfunded grassroots groups toward support by
philanthropic foundations and corporate charity, went on to found
the Gender Public Advocacy Coalition (GenderPAC), one of the
better-staffed national organizations working on gender rights, to
expand transgender lobbying efforts on Capitol Hill, and to serve
as longtime executive director of TrueChild, an organization that
helps donors and policymakers to "reconnect race, class, and gen-
der through 'gender transformative' approaches that challenge rigid
gender norms and inequalities." Wilchins wrote an acerbic primer
on her version of the new transgender politics, Read My Lips: Sexual
Subversion and the End of Gender. In San Francisco, Kiki Whitlock and other transgender activists
worked with the city's Human Rights Commission 1n 1993 and 1994 to produce a landmark report, principally written by FTM
community leader Jamison Green, that documented human rights
abuses against the transgender community at an unprecedented
level of detail. That report became the basis for San Francisco's
1995 transgender antidiscrimination ordinance, one of several such
local measures passed nationwide in the mid-1990s. Around the
same time, in 1994, public health activists launched a program
called "Tranny Tuesday" at the Tom Waddell Health Clinic, which
pioneered a depathologized, harm-reduction, patient-centered ap-
proach to trans health. In the decade ahead, San Francisco built
upon this foundation to begin offering its transgender citizens
greater and greater legal protections against discrimination-and
even offered transgender city employees health care benefits that
covered the cost of their gender transitions more than a decade be-
fore such care became available nationally through the Affordable
Care Act.
Along with political activism, transgender cultural production
picked up pace in the early 1990s. Academic work reflecting the
The Millennial Wave 179
REMEMBERING OUR DEAD
Transgender people as a group experience one of the highest rates of violence and murder in the United States. During the course ofthe
1990s and into the early twenty-first century, several high-profile ho- micides gave the transgender social justice movement a heightened sense of urgency. ~
One of the most notorious incidents took place Ol.Jtside Falls City, Nebraska, on December 31, 1993, during the first flush of the new wave of transgender activism, when John Lotter and Tom Nissen mur-
dered an individual who had been assigned female at birth and who
was just beginning to live as a young man who went by "Brandon" (among several other names). Brandon, who was christened Teena
Brandon at birth, was originally from Omaha but had drifted to rural
Falls City. There he began dating a young woman who claimed initially not to know that he was biologically female, and he was befriended
by Lotter and Nissen. Upon the revelation of Brandon's anatomical
sex, his supposed friends raped him; Brandon reported the rape to the county. sheriff, who took no action. A few days later Nissen and
Lotter tracked Brandon down at another friend's rented farmhouse,
where early on the morning of New Year's Eve they shot and killed him along with two other young people staying in the house. The two killers were eventually convicted of homicide; Lotter received a death
sentence (and is still on death row); Nissen was sentenced to life in
prison without possibility of parole. Brandon gained posthumous ce-
lebrity as the subject of several mass media projects, including Aphro- dite Jones's sensationalistic true crime paperback All She Wanted, the Guggenheim-commissioned web-based multimedia installation Bran- don, the documentary film The Brandon Teena Story, and the feature film Boys Don't Cry.
Although it was the murder of a white transmasculine person that first catapulted deadly antitrans violence into the national spotlight,
by far the most common targets of violence are trans women of color. Tyra Hunter, a twenty-five-year-old African American trans woman
who had transitioned at age fourteen with her family's support, was
on her way to work in Washington, DC, when the car she was riding
continues
180 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
REMEMBERING OUR DEAD continued
in was broadsided on August 7, 1995. As she lay seriously injured in the street, the first responders who initially offered medical care to her
stopped when they discovered she had male genitalia; one remarked, "This bitch ain't no girl. ... It's a nigger, he got a dick." After failing to
receive life-saving assistance in a timely manner, Hunter ~ied shortly thereafter in a hospital emergency room. Her family successfully sued the city for negligence and won a multimillion-dollar settlement. The
murder of Rita Hester, an African American trans woman, in Boston
in 1998 inspired Gwen Smith to found the Remembering Our Dead website that gave birth to Transgender Day of Remembrance (TDOR).
Although TDOR has done much to call attention to the ongoing ep- idemic of antitrans violence, it is sometimes criticized as an event in
which predominantly white trans people build community for them-
selves by memorializing black trans deaths. In 2001, sixteen-year-old Fred Martinez, a Navajo (Dine) youth who
self-represented to others as "gay," "two-spirit," and "Nadleeh" (a Dine term for a traditional nonbinary gender status), was murdered by
schoolmates in Cortez, Colorado; the story is told in the 2009 docu- mentary Two Spirits. In 2002, Gwen Araujo 1 a California teenager, was be.aten and strangled to death by several male acquaintances, with some of whom she reportedly had been sexually active, after she was
discovered to have male genitalia. Defense lawyers attempted to use
the so-called panic defense, in which heterosexual defendants in an- tigay and antitransgender murder or assault cases claim their actions
are justified because of the panic they experience when confronted
with the possibility of committing an act they consider "homosexual." That argument was not ·successful in the Araujo case, which returned
a guilty verdict; transgender legal activists took cold comfort in the tragedy of Araujo's death that the outcome of her case had the effect
of weakening the panic defense nationwide. A Lifetime cable network movie about the story, A Girl Like Me, first aired on June 19, 2006, and a documentary feature Trained in the Ways of Men came out in 2010.
The Millennial Wave 181
new transgender perspectives and political sensibilities began ap-
pearing in peer-reviewed professional journals, and many of the
new breed of transgender scholars-a number of them struggling
to break into the ranks of tenured professorships but finding in ac-
ademe the same kinds of employment discrimination that trans-
gender people faced everywhere-first met face to face at the 1994
Iowa Queer Studies Conference. The next year, historian of sexu-
ality Vern Bullough organized the First International Conference
on Cross-Dressing, Sex, and Gender at California State University,
N orthridge, which brought the new wave of transgender scholar-
ship into face-to-face engagement with old-school researchers. Sub-
sequent gatherings (which eventually started describing themselves
as "transgender studies conferences") were held in Philadelphia,
Oxford (UK), Perth (Australia), and other cities around the world.
In 1998 the prestigious Chronicle of Higher Education published a
feature article recognizing the emergence of transgender studies as a
new interdisciplinary field. Transgender-related material was being
integrated into college courses in a wide range of disciplines, and
a steady stream of transgender scholarship was starting to roll off the press.
In the arts, playwright and actor Kate Bornstein prodded audi-
ences from coast to coast to think about gender in new ways with
her stage show Hidden: A Gender and her 1995 book, Gender Out-
law: On Men, Women, and the Rest of Us-both of which helped
to define transgender style in the 1990s. Trans entertainer Justin
Vivian Bond, a star (along with Kenny Mellman) of the Tony-
nominated Kiki and Herb duet, got her first big break in Born-
stein' s play, while David Harrison, another playwright and actor
who happened to be Bornstein' s life partner at the time, chroni-
cled female-to-male experience in his performance-festival-circuit
crowd-pleaser, FTM The first FTM Conference of the Americas
182 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
was held in San Francisco in 1995 (ironically, at the San Fran-
.cisco Women's Building, which makes meeting spaces available
to a wide variety of progressive causes). Trans men soon received
even more exposure through photographer Loren Cameron's ,,.-for-
traiture work, collected in the 1996 volume Body Alchemy, which
included an arresting self-portrait, God's Will showing Cameron's
own gym-sculpted and testosterone-enhanced physique, a remote
camera-shutter release clutched in one hand, a syringe in the other,
and the artist fully in control of both self-image and the· image-
making process. Another photographer, Mariette Pathy Allen, who
had been documenting the male-to-female cross-dresser and trans-
gender community since the early 1980s, and who has since gone
on to document transgender youth and gender-variant practices in
Asia, the Pacific Islands, and Cuba, also began to document the
flourishing FTM scene in the mid-1990s.
Anohni (formerly Antony Hegarty) of the ensemble Antony and the ]ohnsons (named for transgen- der pioneer Marsha P. Johnson) infuses a trans- gender sensibility into the avant-garde group's musical performances. (PHOTO CREDIT: PIETER M. VAN HATTEM.)
The Millennial Wave 183
Major stories on the new transgender scene started appearing
in high-profile publications such as the New Yorker, the New York
Times, and Mother Jones. Subcultural outlets for transgender cul-
ture erupted at the same time in a spate of new, low-budget, do-it-
yourself zine publications, including Kansas City's TransSisters: The
Journal ofTranssexualFeminism, San Francisco's TNT: 'D.Je Transsex-
ual News Telegraph, and Toronto's Gendertrash. These publications
continued a tradition of small-scale transgender community publish-
ing that stretched back to Virginia Prince's first Transvestia magazine
in 1952. Several of them, particularly Gendertrash, drew inspiration
from the still-flourishing punk zine culture of the later 1970s and
1980s and formed part of the larger subcultural phenomenon some-
times called the "queer zine explosion," a remarkable outpouring of
self-published, sometimes highly ephemeral, periodical publications
about art, culture, and politics that constituted an important facet of
the broader queer movement. The first half of the 1990s represented
a high-water mark in the tradition of such publications, the numbers
and frequency of which dropped off precipitously in the middle of
the decade, in reverse proportion to the rise of the Internet, which
almost overnight became a cheaper distribution outlet than even the
cheapest paper-based, surface-mailed publications.
Mainstream media began paying heightened attention to trans'-
gender themes with the 1992 box-office smash The Crying Game,
whose on-screen story, revolving around the gender ambiguity of
the lead character, Dil, was echoed by off-screen speculations about
the actual gender of the film's star, Jaye Davidson. Even more in-
fluential was Kimberly Peirce's 1999 Boys Don't Cry, which told
the tragic story of Brandon Teena and won Hilary Swank a Best
Actress Oscar for playing a transgender role. Although in recent
years the film has been criticized for starring and being directed by
cisgender women, and for not unambiguously representing Teena
as a trans man with a completely unconflicted gender identity, the
184 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
interpretation offered by Peirce grew from her personal in~?lve
ment in the Transexual Menace vigils outside the Nebraska court-
house where Teena's murder trial transpired and her own sense· of
lesbian transmasculinity. As the philosopher Jacob Hale noted in
an important early scholarly article on Brandon, one of the deepest
tragedies of his story is that in being killed at such a young age; we
really don't know what path his adult life would have taken. It feels
just as important to acknowledge that his gender expression could
have followed many different trajectories as it does to honor the
way he was expressing his masculinity at the time of his death.
With the new millennium looming just a few years in the fu-
ture, with the stock market racing to then-unheard-of heights in
the speculative frenzy of the dot-com boom, and with technology
transforming everyday life in unprecedented ways, transgender
issues-which seemed to unhinge familiar reality by breaking the
accustomed bonds between bodily sex and gendered appearance-
came to be seen as harbingers of the strange new world beginning to
take shape. This moment of premillennial fantasy was captured as it
happened in experimental filmmaker Monika T reut' s 1999 Gender-
nauts, which cast transgender people as bold adventurers setting out
into the uncharted territory of humanity's technologically and bio-
medically enhanced future. But another film that year by two (not
yet publicly out) transgender filmmakers-siblings Lana Wachowski
and Lilly Wachowski' s The Matrix--developed the implications of
transgender perception into a full-blown aesthetic, one that became
paradigmatic not only for transgender embodiment but for depict-
ing the nature of representation and reality in the digital era.
Early Twenty-First-Century Transformations
The burst of transgender activism in the 1990s was framed, from
beginning to end, by larger historical narratives. The Cold War,
The Millennial Wave 185
which had polarized geopolitics since World War II, had come to
an end with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the collapse of
the Soviet Union in 1991, and many residents of the West were
absolutely giddy with the prospect of what then-president George
H. W. Bush called a "New World Order" to be dominated by the
interests of the United States, the sole remaining superf>ower. The
1990s were a period when the growth of neoliberal forms of gov-
ernment accelerated and became more pervasive and entrenched
all around the world. The flourishing of transgender movements
for social change in these years has to be understood not just as
part of a freedom struggle that was gaining strength but also as part
of a broader shift in how societies and state powers managed and
administered the lives of the people who constituted their collec-
tive body politic. Some concrete forms of greater freedom for some
transgender people became possible precisely. because the changes
they needed and worked for also served other ends for other forms of power.
Early twenty-first-century transgender history in the United
States continued many of the trends that characterized the 1990s.
Trans men continued to gain in visibility, to the point that many
younger people (especially those enrolled in traditionally women-
only colleges) came to associate "transgender" more readily with
transmasculinity than they did with trans women. A new crop
of writing by trans men gained audiences larger than could have
been anticipated a decade earlier, including such works as Jamison
Green's Becoming a Visible Man and Max Wolf Valerio' s The Tes-
tosterone Files. Rising-star performers such as Imani Henry, dancer
Sean Dorsey of the Fresh Meat troupe, and hip-hop artist Katastro-
phe all began making names for themselves. Transgender mass
media representation became both mor~ frequent and less preju- dicial, with cable shows such as TransGenerations, the feature film
TransAmerica, and the stage and screen extravaganza Hedwig and
186 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
the Angry Inch finding large and appreciative audiences .. Musical
performers such as Antony Hegarty, who has since come to identify
as a trans woman and is now known as Anohni, pushed transgender
style in unanticipated new artistic directions as lead singer of the
performance ensemble Antony and the Johnsons (named in honor
of transgender hero Marsha P. Johnson). A genderqueer denizen of
New York nightclubs in the 1990s, Anohni' s emotive vocal style
and poignant lyrics expressed the power and pathos of living outside
the gender binary. Their art-which broke out of the underground
club scene thanks to the patronage of perennially cutting-edge art-
ists Lou Reed and Laurie Anderson-linked transgender sensibili-
ties to the cultural avant-garde in ways not seen since the 1960s. A
spate of new authors in the transgender community include mem-
oirists Jennifer Boylan, author of Shes Not There, and Helen Boyd,
author of My Husband Betty and Shes Not the Man I Married, as
well as transfeminist writer Julia Serano.
Gwen Smith's Remembering Our Dead website, first launched in
1999 as a sponsored project of AEGIS, put a spotlight on the chronic
undercurrent of antitransgender violence that left one or two trans-
gender people dead every month since records started being kept. An
annual vigil Smith started in San Francisco in conjunction with the
launch of the website became T ransgender Day of Remembrance,
which is now observed at hundreds of high school and college cam-
puses and LGBT community centers throughout North America
and Europe. It has become an annual opportunity to publicize the
persistence of antitransgender prejudice and violence, particularly di-
rected against trans women of color, in spite of decades of civil rights
gains. At the outset of the 1990s, only three municipalities in the
country offered any kind of legal protection for transgender people
living and working in their jurisdictions, and only one state, Min-
nesota, offered protections at the state level, beginning in 1993. By
the time the new century began, there were twenty-six localities with
The Millennial Wave 187
some form of transgender protections, and before the first decade
of the twenty-first century came to a close there were more than a
hundred, in addition to thirteen states and the District of Columbia.
In 2007, a hate crimes bill, the first piece of federal legislation ever
to address transgender concerns, passed both the Senate and House
of Representatives. In 2008, Allen Andrade became the first person ~
to receive enhanced punishment for an antitransgender hate crime,
when he was sentenced for the first-degree murder of Angie Zapata,
a trans woman he beat to death in Greeley, Colorado, after discover-
ing she had been assigned male at birth.
A great deal of credit for early twenty-first.-century legislative vic-
tories is due to a new wave of legal activist organizations, including
the Sylvia Rivera Law Project in New York; the Transgender Law
Center in San Francisco (which began as a project of the National
Center for Lesbian Rights); the National Center for Transgender
Equality (the lead transgender lobbying organization in Wash~,
ington, DC); and the National Transgender Advocacy Coalition
(NTAC), which draws its leadership from nonmetropolitan and
noncoastal parts of the country. Two historically gay organizations,
Lambda Legal and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (now
known simply as The Task Force), have provided invaluable support
for transgender legal campaigns undertaken by community leaders
and allies such as Shannon Minter, Paisley Currah, Kylar Broadus,
Cecilia Chung, Chris Daley, Monica Roberts, Autumn Sandeen,
Marti Abernathey, Dean Spade, Pauline Park, Masen Davis, Kris
Hayashi, and many others. In the international arena, GATE-
Global Action for Trans* Equality-founded by Justus Eisfeld in
the United States and Mauro Cabral in Argentina, helped keep
transgender issues on the agenda at the United Nations and with
the World Health Organization.
However much some aspects of early twenty-first-century trans-
gender activism represented a steady continuation of longer-term
188 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
trends, the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, represented a
sharp inflection point for trans* politics. It brought about height-
ened border surveillance, increased attention to travel documents,
and more stringent standards for obtaining state-issued identifica-
tion, all of which made life more complicated for many transgender
people. Depending on such variables as where one happened to be
born or what levels of health care one might have been able to af-
ford, some transgender people found it impossible to obtain tightly
controlled identity documents (such as passports) that accurately
reflected their current name or gender appearance-which made
travel impossible in some circumstances and risky or dangerous
in others. The restrictions on movement in the post-9/11 United
States gave transgender people more in common with immigrants,
refugees, and undocumented workers than they might have with
the mainstream gay and lesbian movement. Pursuing transgen-
der justice increasingly involved joining campaigns and struggles
that might seem at first to have little to do with gender identity or
expression-but ·everything to do with how the state polices those
who differ from social norms and tries to solve the bureaucratic
problems that arise from attempting to administer the lives of atyp-
ical members of its population.
A striking example of how transgender interests diverged from
legal activism related to sexual orientation can be found in the
debates about transgender inclusion in the federal Employment
Non-Discrimination Act that took place in late 2007. First intro-
duced for consideration by Congresswoman Bella Abzug in the
1970s, ENDA, as the bill is known, aimed to prohibit employment
discrimination based on sexual orientation. The proposed legisla-
tion didn't make it out of committee for a full congressional debate
until 1994, when the measure failed to pass by a single vote. At
that time, the transgender movement did not have sufficient polit-
ical clout to have gender identity or gender expression provisions
The Millennial Wave 189
added to the language of the bill-indeed, ENDA' s primary lob-
byist, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), actively undermined
transgender activists who were just then beginning to lobby Con-
gress for transgender inclusion within the bill. But as the Tbecame
more and more integrated into the fabric of an LGBT community,
major political organizations such as The Task Force, PFLAG (Par- d
en ts, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays), and other groups
began to advocate for transgender inclusion. Over the course of a
decade, virtually every national and state organization representing
LGBT interests came to support transgender inclusion in federal
employment protection legislation. They argued that transgender
people were in fact the most severely discriminated against of all
the LGBT communities, and that, moreover, most discrimination
against gay, lesbian, and bisexual people who were not transgen-
der was rooted in prejudices about gender-normative appearances
and behaviors-that is, it was the too-effeminate gay man, or the
too-masculine woman, who were more vulnerable to employment
discrimination than straight-looking, straight-acting gay men and
lesbian women. A gradual consensus emerged among those most
active in advancing the LGBT legislative agenda that adding em-
ployment protections for gender identity and expression was a
necessary amendment to ENDA, one that would protect all US
residents from being fired for failing to live up to a stereotype of
masculine or feminine social roles but that would be especially ben-
eficial for transgender people.
When Democrats took control of both houses of Congress after
the midterm elections in 2006, ENDA was poised for passage for
the first time since 1994. In the spring of 2007, even the HRC-
long a holdout on a transgender-inclusive legislative strategy-
finally got on board and lobbied in support of a version of ENDA
that protected gender identity and expression as well as sexual ori-
entation. All seemed to be going well until September 2007, when
190 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
the bill's longtime sponsor, the openly gay Massachusetts congress""'
min Barney Frank, decided, on the basis of an informal poll of his
colleagues, that a sexual-orientation-only version of ENDA could
pass, but that a transgender-inclusive version would fail. Rather
than wait to gather additional support or conduct more extensive
education and lobbying efforts, Frank took it upon himself to split
ENDA into two separate bills-one for sexual orientation and the
other for gender identity.
US CITIES AND COUNTIES WITH TRANSGENDER ANTI-DISCRIMINATION PROTECTIONS IN 2016
Alaska Alachua (County) Sandpoint
Anchorage Broward (County) Victor
Arizona Gainesville Illinois
Phoenix Gulfport Aurora
Tempe Key West Carbondale
Tucson Lake Worth Champaign
Arkansas Leon (County) Chicago
Fayetteville Miami Beach Cook (County)
Eureka Springs Miami-Dade (County) Decatur
California Monroe (County) DeKalb
Los Angeles Palm Beach (County) Evanston
Oakland Pinellas (County) Peoria
Palm Springs Orlando Springfield
Sacramento Tampa Indiana
San Diego Volusia (County) Bloomington
San Francisco West Palm Beach Evansville
Santa Cruz (County) Georgia Indianapolis
West Hollywood Atlanta Marion (County)
Colorado Idaho Monroe (County)
Boulder Boise South Bend
Denver Coeur d'Alene Iowa
District of Columbia Idaho Falls Ames
Washington Ketchum Cedar Rapids
Florida Moscow Council Bluffs
Atlantic Beach Pocatello Davenport
continues
r
Des Moines Iowa City Johnson (County) Sioux Waterloo Kansas Lawrence Roeland Park Kentucky Covington Danville Frankfort Jefferson (County) Lexington Lexington-Fayette (County) Louisville Morehead Vicco Louisiana New Orleans Shreveport Maryland Baltimore Baltimore (County) College Park Howard (County) Hyattsville Montgomery (County) Massachusetts Boston Cambridge Northampton Salem Worcester Michigan Ann Arbor Detroit East Lansing Ferndale Grand Rapids
Ihe Millennial Wave 191
Huntington Woods Ohio Kalamazoo Athens Lansing Bowling Green Pleasant Ridge Cincinnati Saugatuck Cleveland Sterling Heights Columbus Traverse Coshocton Ypsilanti ~ Dayton ·- Minnesota East Cleveland Minneapolis Newark St. Paul Oxford Missouri Summit (County) Columbia Toledo Clayton Yellow Springs Kansas City Oregon Kirkwood Beaverton Olivette Bend St. Louis Benton (County) St. Louis (County) Corvallis University City Eugene Montana Hillsboro Bozeman Lake Oswego Butte-Silver Bow Lincoln City Helena Multnomah (County) Missoula Portland Nebraska Salem Omaha Pennsylvania New York Abington Township Albany Allegheny (County) Binghamton Allentown Buffalo Bethlehem Ithaca Cheltenham Township New York Doylestown Rochester East Norriton Suffolk (County) Easton Syracuse Erie (County) Tompkins (County) Harrisburg Westchester (County) Hatboro North Carolina Haverford Township Chapel Hill Jenkintown Borough
Lansdowne Borough
continues
192 TRANSGENDER HISTORY
US CITIES AND COUNTIES WITH TRANSGENDER ANTI-DISCRIMINATION PROTECTIONS IN 2016 continued
Lower Merion Township South Carolina Springdale New Hope Borough Myrtle Beach Summit (County) Newton Borough Texas Taylorsville Philadelphia Austin West Valley City Pittsburgh Dallas Washington Pittston Dallas (County) Burien Scranton Fort Worth King (County) Reading Plano Seattle c:; Springfield Township Utah Spokane State College Borough Alta Tacoma Susquehanna Township Grand (County) West Virginia Swarthmore Harrisville Charleston Upper Merion Township Logan Huntington West Chester Borough Midvale Wisconsin Whitemarsh Township Moab Dane (County) York Murray City Madison Rhode Island Ogden Milwaukee Providence Salt Lake City Wyoming
Salt Lake (County) Laramie
The reaction in the LGBT community was swift and unprece-
dented: more than three hundred national, state, and local organiza-
tions formed an ad hoc campaign, United ENDA, to demand that
transgender-inclusive language be restored to the bill. LGBT activ-
ists across the country felt that more than a decade's worth of work
to build an expansive movement had been betrayed at the last min-
ute by the movement's congressional leadership. At the same time,
many lesbian and gay people who had not felt entirely comfortable
being linked to transgender issues since the mid-1990s gave voice
to long-suppressed antitransgender attitudes they'd formerly con-
sidered too "politically incorrect" to express publicly and supported
splitting ENDA into two bills. HRC, which had only recently come
to support transgender-inclusive language in ENDA, lost what little
The Millennial Wave 193
credibility it' had with the transgender community when it made an
abrupt about-face and endorsed the sexual-orientation-only version
of the bill. In the end, the trans-inclusive version of ENDA died
in committee, while the sexual-orientation-only version passed the
House of Representatives-a Pyrrhic victory, given that the Senate
never considered it, and President Bush promised to veto any ver-
sion of ENDA that made it to his desk. ~
As a result of the ENDA controversy, the trans-inclusive queer
and LGBT movements that transgender people had worked to
build since the early 1990s threatened to split apart. There were
stark divisions between "homonormative" gay and lesbian people
who seemed poised for mainstream acceptance and trans and
gender-nonconforming people who were still targeted by discrim-
inatory legislation and burdened by administrative practices that
made their lives more precarious. At the same time, trans activ-
ists in the LGBT movement began foregrounding trans issues as
the movement's most pressing concern, demanding accountabil-
ity from their fellow social change agents and launching more in-
dependent and narrowly focused trans-activist projects. With the
growing presence of positive transgender representation in mass
media, and the increasing acceptance younger people seemed to
exhibit toward transgender and gender-nonconforming identities
and behaviors, the stage seemed set for dramatic breakthroughs or
setbacks on transgender rights as the 2008 presidential campaign
headed toward a historic electoral outcome and the nation plunged
into the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.