5questions about Strategic Services Marketing
Autumn 2020
Associate Professor Francois Carrillat
Marketing Discipline Group
UTS Business School
24706 Strategic Services Marketing
A Customer Experience Perspective
Lecture 5: Customer relationships (Ch. 6)
*
(see ‘Program’ in the 24706 Subject Outline)
Sessions 1and 2
Chapter 1: Introduction to services
Chapter 2: The Gaps model of service quality
Chapter 8: Service innovation and design (blueprinting)
Chapter 9: Customer-defined service standards
Chapter 3: Customer expectations of services
Chapter 4: Customer perceptions of service
Chapter 10: Physical evidence and the servicescape
Chapter 6: Building customer relationships
Chapter 7: Service recovery
Chapter 11: Employees’ roles in service delivery
Chapter 12: Customers’ roles in service delivery
Chapter 13: Managing demand and capacity
Chapter 15: Pricing of services
Chapter 14: Integrated marketing communications
FE
NOTE: Chapters 5 and 16 are not explicitly discussed in lectures
Subject Overview: Textbook Readings & Exams
Sessions 3,4 and 5
Title: Services Marketing, Integrating
Customer Focus Across the Firm
Authors: Valerie Zeithaml, Mary Jo Bitner, Dwayne Gremler
Publication Details:
2012, 6th Edition, McGraw Hill
Textbook: show and tell US view but will complement with examples international and australian.
*
Customers generate more profit over time…
*
Customer Lifetime Profitability
Profit from reference: only input lower acquisition cost as opposed to lower acquisition cost + new revenue stream
*
Cementing customer bonds through enhanced experiences
*
Cementing customer bonds through enhanced experiences
Lego CFO John Goodwin reckons that more than 85 million kids (and, let’s be honest, a fair few adults) “had a Lego play experience” over the course of last year. Euromonitor estimates that Lego controls around 7% of the world toy market, up from below 4% five years ago. It is closing the gap fast: Hasbro (around 8%) and market leader Mattel (12%) have both been struggling to boost sales of late.
*
Cementing customer bonds through enhanced experiences
*
Cementing customer bonds through enhanced experiences
–Lead Users; Children and adults who is heavily engaged in LEGO (top of pyramid) ADUlt fans of lego
–One-to-One layer; Group which LEGO keeps an ongoing dialog
–The Community Layer; Users of online games, communities, etc.
–Active household layer; Have bought LEGO sometime in the past. (bottom of pyramid)
Lead User
- people who LEGO actively engages with
1:1 Community
- people whose names and addresses LEGO knows
Connected Community
- people who have bought LEGO and have been either to a LEGO shop or park
Active Household
- people who have bought LEGO in the last 12 months
Covered Households
- people who have bought LEGO once
All Households
- those who have never bought LEGO
LEGO's Rules for Social Media
LEGO Ideas
LEGO's very own Social Media Platform (Lead Users)
Allows users to submit ideas
Receive feedback
Get votes
Their idea may be turned into a real LEGO set
Show Pine and Gilmore article figurel expllain that Lego alkready had the product and the experience but not the service which they imprved with relationship marketing. LLesson: cannot move to experiences if you have not transited to services Ex: Michlein from tire manfacturer to fleet management: manufacturing to service; tomorrow experience? how? could be a final exam question!
*
Relationship development model for services
Confidence Benefits
Confidence in correct performance
Ability to trust the provider
Lower anxiety when purchasing
Knowing what to expect and receive
Social Benefits
Mutual recognition and friendship between service provider and customer
Familiarity
Special Treatment Benefits
Better price
Discounts not available to most customer
Extra services
Higher priority when there is a wait
Economic Benefits
Increased revenues
Reduced marketing and administrative costs
Regular revenue stream
Customer Behaviour Benefits
Strong word-of-mouth endorsements
Customer voluntary performance
Social benefits to other customers
Mentors to other customers
Human Resource Management Benefits
Easier jobs for employees
Social benefits for employees
Employee retention
*
Addressing Key Churn Drivers
- Reduce inconvenience and non-monetary costs
- Deliver quality service
- Have fair and transparent pricing
- Industry specific drivers
Take active steps to retain customers
- Save teams: specially trained call-centre staff to deal with customers who wish to cancel their accounts
- Must be careful about how save teams are rewarded
e.g., mobile phone industry: handset replacement a common reason for subscribers discontinuing services – offer handset replacement programs
*
The Customer Pyramid
Target the right customer and match them to what firm can deliver
How do customer needs relate to operations elements?
How well can service personnel meet expectations of different types of customers?
Can company match or exceed competing services that are directed at same types of customers?
Focus on number of customers served as well as value of each customer
Some customers more profitable than others in the short term
Others may have room for long-term growth
“Right customers” are not always high spenders
Can come from a large group of people that no other supplier is serving well
The Platinum Tier
Most profitable customers
Typically heavy users
Not particularly price sensitive
Willing to invest in and try new offerings
Committed customers
The Gold Tier
Profitable (but less than Platinums)
Customer want price discounts that limit profit margins
Not as loyal
Heavy users, but may use multiple vendors rather than one focal company
The Iron Tier
Not essential to firm
Provide volume needed to use firm’s capacity
Spending levels, loyalty, and profit levels do not warrant special treatment
The Lead Tier
Cost the company money
Demand attention despite low levels of spending and profitability
Can be problem customers
*
Solutions to problem customers (Lead tier)
- Discouraging bad customers
- Blacklisting
- Firing customers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOjSEW09NxE
*
Further Reading
- Berry, L., (1995). Relationship marketing of services – growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 23, No. 4,
pp. 236-45
- Bendapudi, N. and Berry, L., (1997). Customers' Motivations for Maintaining Relationships with Service Providers. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 15-37.
- Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda. European
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 8-32. - Colgate, M. and Stewart, K., (1998). The Challenge of Relationships in Services: a New Zealand Study. International Journal of Service Industry Management,
Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 454-468.
*
Further Reading
- Palmatier, Robert W., Rajiv P. Dant, Dhruv Grewal, & Kenneth R. Evans. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing ,70 (4), 136-153.
- Palmatier, Robert W., Burke Jarvis, Cheryl, Bechkoff, Jennifer R., & Kardes, Frank R. (2009) The Role of Customer Gratitude in Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73 (5),1-18.
- Reinartz, W. and Kumar, V., (2002). The Mismanagement of Customer Loyalty, Harvard Business Review, July.
- Sheth, J.N. and Parvatiyar, A., (2000). Handbook of Relationship Marketing
Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA - Zeithaml, V., Rust, R., and Lemon, K.N., (2001). The Customer Pyramid: Creating and Serving Profitable Customers. California Management Review,
Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 118-142.
*
Autumn 2020
Associate Professor Francois Carrillat
Marketing Discipline Group
UTS Business School
24706 Strategic Services Marketing
A Customer Experience Perspective
Lecture 5: Service failure and recovery (Ch. 7)
*
Service Recovery and Service Failure
What United Airlines’ service failure created a situation where congress inquired into the entire industry?
Failure definition is very wide; everything below expectations is a failure. Different degrees of failures.
other findings indicating that most
customers have more negative feelings about an
organization after they go througli tlie senicereco\"
en' process.'
*
Service Recovery and Service Failure: Definitions
- Service Failure
“…service performance that falls below a customer's expectations.”
- Service Recovery
“A process that identifies service failures, effectively resolves customer problems, classifies their root cause(s), and yields data that can be integrated with other measures of performance to assess and improve the service system.”
(Tax and Brown, 1998)
FedEx
Kitchen nightmares
Seinfeld car rental
Failure definition is very wide; everything below expectations is a failure. Different degrees of failures.
other findings indicating that most
customers have more negative feelings about an
organization after they go througli tlie senicereco\"
en' process.'
*
Typology of Service Failures
*
Causes of Service Switching
25%
20%
11%
*
The Service Failure and Recovery Process
Tax, S. S., & Brown, S. (1998). Recovering and learning from service failure. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 75-88.
Ted Levitt: "You don't know what yoit aren't going to get
until you don't get it."^ His cotntiient t"enects citstotnet"
s' unclear expectatiotis Ltliout tiiany sen'ices
and lielps explaiti why they do not cotnplain when
they ate dissatisfied. Otie way to ovetcome the
problem of imdear expectations is to impletnent
ser\'ice standards, which ate often fomtiiitnicated
through sen-ice guarantees.
Between stages 1 and 2: develop recovery standard where failure is fixed even if customers unaware of before they can report problem or complain: proactive approach to failure.
Stage 2: resolving customer problem even if no complain yet: ex resurant with 15 minutes warrantee will offer appetizier without asking if lunch served late.
*
Failure and Recovery Process: Identifying Failures (stage 1)
What needs to happen before you can start the recovery process?
BTW: 100-21 = 80% different dat source; same results should feel pretty confident the phenomneon of non complainant not intending to repurchase is that high.
Factors incluencing complaining behaviors:
Level of dissatisfaction
i.e., does it seem worth it?
Personal importance of the service
Cost of complaining
e.g., time and effort
Benefits of complaining
i.e., value of the outcome
Likelihood of resolution
i.e., belief that the problem will/can be solved satisfactorily
Available resources for making a complaint
Access to a means of registering a complaint
Knowing who is to blame for the problem
Demographics
e.g., younger and better educated people are more likely to complain
*
Identifying service failures: Why Do Customers Not Complain?
There are also many reasons why a customer would not complain.
- Customers do not complain when they perceive that they have low personal control over the situation.
- Because services are inseparable, maybe customers themselves are doing something wrong!
- Because many services are highly technical and specialised, customers might not feel adequate in expertise to complain.
*
Identifying service failures: Reducing Complaint Barriers (stage 1)
- Make feedback easy and convenient
(contact details on all communications)
- Assure that the feedback is taken seriously
(have service recovery procedures in place and communicate this to customers; feature service improvements based on customer feedback)
- Make feedback experience positive
(thank customers for feedback; allow anonymous feedback)
Barriers to cmplaining:
Inconvenience
(hard to find out the right complaint procedure; effort required)
Doubtful payoff
(uncertain if action will be taken by the firm to fix the problem)
Unpleasantness
(fear of being treated rudely; hassle and/or embarrassment)
*
The Service Failure and Recovery Process
Tax, S. S., & Brown, S. (1998). Recovering and learning from service failure. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 75-88.
‘Fix the customer’ then ‘fix the problem’ then ‘fix the service’
*
Failure and Recovery Process: Solving Customer Problems (stage 2)
‘Fix the customer’
*
An Alternative View: Rental / Non-Ownership View (1)
Failure and Recovery Process: Solving Customer Problems (stage 2)
: Recovery Paradox and Double Deviation
- Recovery paradox: Is a customer who has experienced a service failure and exemplary service recovery likely to be more satisfied with the service provider than if he or she had not experienced the failure in the first place?
“A good recovery can turn angry, frustrated customers into loyal ones. ..can, in fact, create more goodwill than if things had gone smoothly in the first place.” (Hart et al. 1990)
- Double deviation: Is a customer who has experienced a service failure and a poor recovery likely to be less satisfied with the service provider than if no recovery was attempted in the first place?
…‘Fix the problem’
Should a firm ‘screw up’ just a little so that it can ‘fix the problem’ superbly?
BUT
- Only a small percent of customers complain
- Service recovery must be of a very high standard
- Service recovery is expensive
Even though service recovery can improve satisfaction, it has not been found to increase purchase intentions or perceptions of the brand
Is a recovery attempt a double edged sword.
*
Service Recovery Paradox
*
Recovery Paradox and Double Deviation: Myths or Reality?
- Recovery paradox:
- It is possible after 1 failure
but
- It does not happen after 2 failures
- More likely for minor failures
- More likely when organization cannot be blamed for it
- A good recovery increases expectations
but
- It also increases perceived severity of next failure
‘No good deed goes unpunished’
- Double deviation:
- Only observed with 2 service failures
- Failure similarity increases negative impact of 2nd failure
‘Do not make the same mistake twice’
Maxham III, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). A Longitudinal Study of Complaining Customers' Evaluations of Multiple Service Failures and Recovery Efforts. Journal of Marketing, 76, 57-71
255 banking customers who went through 2 failures anbd 2 reciovery attemps; core and facilitating service failaures were experienced.
Failure similarity: ‘do not make the same mistake twice’
‘no good deed goes unpunished’
*
Why Do Customers Complain?
There are many reasons why a customer would complain, even when it is non-instrumental in nature.
- Complaining is a pressure valve.
- Complaining helps customers re-assert (some) personal control over the situation.
- Complaining can help solicit sympathy from others who are in a similar predicament.
- Complaining shows others that you are experts and/or have high standards and tastes.
Recovery should be attempted even if nit complain has been received it is about fixing identified failires/
*
*
Two types of complainers: reparation versus vigilant
- Less interest in getting revenge
- Write more formally, using “I” and a greater focus on the past and facts.
- Desire for reparation is their strongest motivations.
Reparation-oriented complainers:
Vigilant-oriented complainers:
- More interest in getting revenge
- Write les formally, with a greater use of “you” and “they”, and at the present tense
- Their desire for reparation remains high.
*
*
Which recovery efforts better suit each type of consumer
…prefer to be contacted privately through email, a phone or skype call.
…Obtaining a resolution is their ultimate goal.
Compensation and service improvements have both equal values as type of solution.
Reparation-oriented Complainers:
*
*
Which recovery efforts better suit each type of consumer
Vigilante Complainers:
…respond as favorably to social media (Facebook or Twitter) compared to email.
…their goal is to make the firms “pay” for what they did.
prefer individual compensation and reward to service improvement.
*
Why there is less and less satisfaction at the recovery stage? What are the implications of this?
Why is the
situation
worsening?
Why is it bad?
- Managers see the recovery process as a cost center rather than a profit center
- We forget the effects on the long term relationship.
- They stop investing in the recovery process
- Complex telephonic system
- Online complaint
- Difficulties to voice one’s concerns
- Call centers in India, Morocco, etc.
- Use inflexible scripts
*
- Revenge: taking actions to punish the firm for what it did…
- After a double deviation, consumers feel it is appropriate to get revenge
- Why?
Service Failure and recovery: possible pathways
Vengeance
Double
deviation
Service Failure
Complaint to a firm
Do nothing
Exit
Recovery
Recovery paradox
Failed Recovery
*
Customers Revenge: examples
Dave Carroll: ‘United Breaks Guitars’
Confidence Benefits
- Confidence in correct performance
- Ability to trust the provider
- Lower anxiety when purchasing
- Knowing what to expect and receive
Social Benefits
- Mutual recognition and friendship between service provider and customer
- Familiarity
Special Treatment Benefits
- Better price
- Discounts not available to most customer
- Extra services
- Higher priority when there is a wait
Economic Benefits
- Increased revenues
- Reduced marketing and administrative costs
- Regular revenue stream
Customer Behaviour Benefits
- Strong word-of-mouth endorsements
- Customer voluntary performance
- Social benefits to other customers
- Mentors to other customers
Human Resource Management Benefits
- Easier jobs for employees
- Social benefits for employees
- Employee retention
*
Service Failure: When a Strong Relationship is Harmful
Strong Relationships are a Double-Edged Sword
Confidence Benefits
- Confidence in correct performance
- Ability to trust the provider
- Lower anxiety when purchasing
- Knowing what to expect and receive
Social Benefits
- Mutual recognition and friendship between service provider and customer
- Familiarity
Special Treatment Benefits
- Better price
- Discounts not available to most customer
- Extra services
- Higher priority when there is a wait
Economic Benefits
- Increased revenues
- Reduced marketing and administrative costs
- Regular revenue stream
Customer Behaviour Benefits
- Strong word-of-mouth endorsements
- Customer voluntary performance
- Social benefits to other customers
- Mentors to other customers
Human Resource Management Benefits
- Easier jobs for employees
- Social benefits for employees
- Employee retention
*
Service Failure: When a Strong Relationship is Harmful
Grégoire, Y., Tripp, T. M., & Legoux, R. (2009). When customer love turns into lasting hate: the effects of relationship strength and time on customer revenge and avoidance. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 18-32.
172 respondenst over 4 waves of qustionnaires;’ respondets posted complainst on consumer affair.com or rippoff .com
Desire for revange decreases signifcaintly slower fo rhigh qulaity relationship than for low quality relationship; avoidance increases fatse for high quality relationship.
Relationship quality was measured via the 3 dimensions of trst, commitment, and social benefits.
4 waves with 2 weeks between waves; on-line complaint took place at least 6 weeks prior to first wave.
Do not disappoint your best customers.
This beg the question of what vengeance does to the relationship bond?
*
The Service Failure and Recovery Process
Tax, S. S., & Brown, S. (1998). Recovering and learning from service failure. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 75-88.
*
Failure and Recovery Process: Communicating and Classifying Failures (stage 3)
- Learn from recovery experiences
Use your complaints as a source of information; root cause analysis - Learn from lost customers
Find out why customers left your organization; exit interviews
…and then ‘fix the service’
Record faliures in databse – Learn from mistakes
Do not treat failures as isolated incidents but as part of the service production process that failed. For instance Marriott report and collect systemtaic complains and decided not to have TV in bathrooms but additional ironing baorads as housekeeper reported it was a very frequent complaint.,
Forward failure information to individuals who made mistake or error; employee recovering the mistake is often not the same who made the actual mistake (billing error, restaurant meal not well cooked, etc.). Disneland: person who received the most complaintis the garbage collector.
Categorize customers; some companies automatically put a cusatomer who recently complain on a VIP list. Also, helps pointing out which customer is a demon – always complaining and never being satisfied with recovery.
From their data base of eventg (failures and recovery) Hampton Inn flag customers who have abused their guarrantee and when they wnat to book a room next time they recommend another hotel.
*
The Service Failure and Recovery Process
Tax, S. S., & Brown, S. (1998). Recovering and learning from service failure. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 75-88.
*
Failure and Recovery Process: Integrating Data and Improving Overall Service (Stage 4)
Improving protocols and systems
See chapter 5 on research methods; add qualitative and quantitative flavor to service encounter study or gap analysis. Expectyed range can be low and narrow but gap analysis does not revelas how many times performance was outside of the acceptable range
Even if performance below the acceptable range does not mean that failure was all the time; hence frequency and seveirity can only be known thourhgh an integration of service failure and recovery attempts data,
Important that falire and recovery data be disseminated to personnel who works at the sensitive touchpoints where recurrent failures occur.
United Airlines: road warriors business traveles, 37% of revenue but only 6% of travelers most
A year after the infamous United dragging incident, has anything changed for airline travelers?
This ad will end in 13 seconds
United Airlines settled with its passenger who was yanked from his seat to make room for airline crew members. (Reuters)
By Lori Aratani
April 9, 2018
In the year since a Kentucky doctor was violently dragged off a United Airlines flight after refusing to give up his seat, the number of passengers bumped from their flights has dropped significantly and airlines have reduced overbooking. Even so, consumer advocates and the lawyer who represented David Dao said they are disappointed by how little has changed in the wake of the incident that drew worldwide condemnation and calls to boycott the airline.
“We have seen much less improvement than we had hoped for,” said Thomas Demetrio, the Chicago-based lawyer who represented Dao in his case against United. “The airline industry is not closely regulated, and I thought this would change things.”
[A man wouldn’t give up his seat on a United flight, so he was dragged off screaming]
Added William J. McGee, aviation adviser for Consumers Union: “Any changes that airlines made are, frankly, not very impressive.”
Dao was a passenger aboard a flight from Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport to Louisville on April 9, 2017. Passengers had already boarded the flight when a United representative asked for volunteers to give up their seats. The airline said it needed the seats to make room for crew members who needed to be in Louisville so they could staff another flight the next morning. Two other passengers gave up their seats, but when United officials approached Dao, he declined.
Airline police were summoned and Dao was dragged off the plane. Video taken by other passengers and shared widely on social media showed Dao screaming as he was removed from the aircraft and then again when he suddenly returned to the plane, looking confused, his faced bloodied.
The video fueled outrage in the United States and around the world and there were calls for a boycott. United’s stock price tumbled and chief executive Oscar Munoz’s attempts to tamp down the furor only made the situation worse.
Less than a month after the incident, the airline reached a confidential settlement with Dao.
United officials say they have learned lessons from the incident.
“Flight 3411 was a defining moment for United Airlines and it is our responsibility — our mission — to make sure we as a company and all of our 90,000 employees learn from that experience,” United spokesman Charles Hobart said. “The changes we have implemented better serve our customers while empowering our employees.”
The airline outlined a 10-point plan they say puts customers first. Among the changes: Travelers who voluntarily give up their seats are eligible to receive up to $10,000 in travel certificates. The airline — as well as other carriers — also promised to reexamine its policy of overbooking — selling more seats than are available on a flight. And officials said airline personnel would no longer call outside law enforcement officials to remove passengers from flights unless it was a safety or security matter.
[Embattled United chief said he felt “shame” when he watched video of man being dragged from plane]
After the United incident, other major airlines made similar pledges. In hearings on Capitol Hill, airline executives said they would stop overbooking flights, and major carriers including American and Delta increased the compensation for passengers who are bumped from their flights.
Lawmakers introduced a flurry of legislation, but in the end, airlines were largely left to police themselves. The Transportation Department, which also investigated Dao’s removal, declined to fine United, saying that although the airline violated some rules regarding the overbooking of flights, investigators found no evidence of race or nationality-based discrimination in the incident. United, they concluded, had not engaged in a pattern of rule-breaking that would warrant a fine.
[Lawyer for United passenger: Dragging was more horrifying than when he fled Vietnam]
Still, industry executives say progress has been made. They point to figures from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics that show that the number of passengers bumped from flights in 2017 was the lowest in decades. According to BTS, carriers posted a bumping rate of 0.34 per 10,000 passengers. It was also a decline from 2016 of 0.62 per 10,000 passengers.
The number of passenger complaints however, increased 1.3 percent in 2017, to 18,148, from the previous year’s total of 17,908.
McGee, of Consumers Union, noted that statistics collected by the federal government don’t always provide a complete picture of traveler sentiment. For example, he said the federal statistics don’t include complaints made directly to airlines.
“The good news is that DOT has a database where they will accept complaints,” he said. “The bad news is that very few people realize that.”
Airlines, including United, have continued to come under fire for their treatment of travelers.
In October, the NAACP issued a “travel advisory” urging travelers, particularly African Americans, to rethink whether they should use American Airlines. NAACP officials cited a “troubling pattern of disturbing incidents” in issuing the advisory. American Airlines officials, who met with NAACP representatives, emphasized that they were committed to providing “a positive, safe travel experience for everyone who flies with us.”
Earlier this year, United again found itself back on the defensive after a 1o-month-old puppy suffocated aboard one of its flights. A flight attendant for the flight from Houston to New York allegedly told the pet’s owner, who was traveling with the dog and her two children, that the animal had to be placed in its carrier and placed in an overhead bin. Witnesses said the flight attendant told the woman that if she didn’t comply, the family would not be allowed to travel. The woman placed the puppy in its carrier in the overhead bin, and when the flight arrived in New York the puppy was no longer breathing. The airline took responsibility and pledged to reexamine its policies regarding animals.
Even so, at a time when record numbers of people are flying, industry executives say they are sensitive to the criticism.
“U.S. airlines remain steadfast in our commitment to improving the customer service experience for travelers and ensuring that they receive the respect and dignity that they deserve,” said Alison McAfee, spokeswoman for Airlines for America, a trade group that represents some of the nation’s largest carriers. “The industry continues to work and invest in our ultimate goal of providing a safe, efficient and enjoyable travel experience each and every day.”
This post has been updated to clarify that the NAACP issued a travel advisory for American Airlines.
*
Failure and Recovery Process: Integrating Data and Improving Overall Service (Stage 4)
- Use failure and recovery data to complement to service quality data
- Disseminate results
- Invest in quality
Link failure and recovery data to customer tiers
See chapter 5 on research methods; add qualitative and quantitative flavor to service encounter study or gap analysis. Expectyed range can be low and narrow but gap analysis does not revelas how many times performance was outside of the acceptable range
Even if performance below the acceptable range does not mean that failure was all the time; hence frequency and seveirity can only be known thourhgh an integration of service failure and recovery attempts data,
Important that falire and recovery data be disseminated to personnel who works at the sensitive touchpoints where recurrent failures occur.
United Airlines: road warriors business traveles, 37% of revenue but only 6% of travelers most
*
Recovery Strategy: Maxham III and Netemeyer’s (2003) Study
Maxham III, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2003). Firms reap what they sow: the effects of shared values and perceived organizational justice on customers' evaluations of complaint handling. Journal of Marketing, 46-62
Attraction-Selection-Attrition (ASA) leads to a strong shared culture
Still today 65% of complaints initiated witjh front line workers.
Study: 350 complainers who purchased on oine electronic equipment from a US store.
Companies tend to attract, hire and retain people whose values are consistent with the company,s goal.
Customer extra role: the extent to which the service agent exeeced their expecations in resolving their complaint.
*
Service recovery strategy: Shared organizational values
Fair Treatment (or Justice) for customer recovery
- Outcome (or distributive) justice relates to how fairly consumers are compensated for their complaints
- Procedural justice concerns the policies and rules that comprise the complaining process
- Interactional justice concerns the behaviour of the firm’s representatives during the complaint resolution process
Fair Treatment (or Justice) of employee
- Outcome (or distributive) justice: are employees rewarded fairly relative to their effort and performance?
- Procedural justice: are the policies and procedures used to making decisions about employees perceived as fair?
- Interactional justice: do employees believe they have been treated justly in their interaction with their employer?
*
Recovery Strategy: Instilling a Culture
‘Any employee who receives a complaint owns the complaint’
‘Instant guest pacification will be ensured by all. React quickly to correct the problem immediately. Follow up with a telephone call within twenty minutes to verify the problem has been resolved to the customer's satisfaction. Do everything you possibly can to never lose a guest.’
- Employees and Organizations must have the similar values. Example: Ritz-Carlton ‘Basics’ on cards
American Express pays careful
attention to the job satisfaction of its in\"estment
advisers, since it estimates that more than 30 percent
of an adviser'.s client.s would defect if the advi.ser left
the company.
Every employee has up to $2000 discretionary amount to be spent on solving guest problems or make their experience unforgettable. Ex: building a woowen path for a husband and wife who is in a wheelchair so they can have dinner on the beach. The physicla symbol of the card embodies the vaklues of the organization and make them more vidi and more memorable.
*
Recovery Strategy : Service Guarantees
- A pledge or assurance that a product offered by a firm will perform as promised and, if not, then some form of reparation will be undertaken by the firm
- Services are often not guaranteed:
- Cannot return the service
- Service experience is intangible (so what do you guarantee?)
How do guarantees benefit companies?
What is guarranteed is the outocme more than a specific service: 100% satisfaction.
A good guarantee forces the company to focus on its customers.
An effective guarantee sets clear standards for the organisation
A good guarantee generates immediate and relevant feedback from customers
When the guarantee is invoked there is an instant
opportunity to recover
Information generated through the guarantee
can be tracked and integrated into continuous
improvement efforts
A service guarantee reduces customers’ sense
of risk and builds confidence in the
organisation
Hampton Inn hotels, for example,
realized $11 million in additional revenue
from the implementation of it.s .ser-
\ ice guarantee and .scored the highest
customer retention rate in the industry.-
*
Recovery Strategy: Designing Service Guarantees
- Unconditional
- Meaningful
- Easy to Understand
- Easy to Invoke
Unconditional
The guarantee should make its promise unconditionally
Meaningful
The firm should guarantee elements of the service that are important to the customer
The payout should cover fully the customer’s dissatisfaction
Easy to Understand
For customers and employees
Easy to Invoke
The firm should eliminate hoops or red tape in the way of accessing or collecting on the guarantee
*
Service Recovery Strategies: When Not to Offer a Service Guarantee
- Companies have a strong reputation for service excellence
- Company does not have good quality level
- Quality cannot be controlled because of external forces
- Consumers see little financial, personal or physiological risk
associated with the purchase
When is the best opportunity for a guarantee?
When reputation is below actual quality
(realign expectation with performance)
*
Further Reading
- Grégoire, Y., Tripp, T. M., & Legoux, R. (2009). When customer love turns into lasting hate: the effects of relationship strength and time on customer revenge and avoidance. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 18-32.
- Mattila, A. S., & Wirtz, J. (2004). Consumer complaining to firms: the determinants of channel choice. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(2), 147-155.
- Maxham III, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). A Longitudinal Study of Complaining Custorners' Evaluations of Multiple Service Failures and Recovery Efforts. Journal of Marketing, 76, 57-71
- Maxham III, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). Modeling customer perceptions of complaint handling over time: the effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and intent. Journal of Retailing, 78(4), 239-252
- Maxham III, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2003). Firms reap what they sow: the effects of shared values and perceived organizational justice on customers' evaluations of complaint handling. Journal of Marketing, 46-62.
- Tax, S. S., & Brown, S. (1998). Recovering and learning from service failure. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 75-88.
- Wirtz, J., & Kum, D. (2004). Consumer cheating on service guarantees. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(2), 159-175.
*
*
Textbook: show and tell US view but will complement with examples international and australian.
*
*
Profit from reference: only input lower acquisition cost as opposed to lower acquisition cost + new revenue stream
*
*
Lego CFO John Goodwin reckons that more than 85 million kids (and, let’s be honest, a fair few adults) “had a Lego play experience” over the course of last year. Euromonitor estimates that Lego controls around 7% of the world toy market, up from below 4% five years ago. It is closing the gap fast: Hasbro (around 8%) and market leader Mattel (12%) have both been struggling to boost sales of late.
*
*
–Lead Users; Children and adults who is heavily engaged in LEGO (top of pyramid) ADUlt fans of lego
–One-to-One layer; Group which LEGO keeps an ongoing dialog
–The Community Layer; Users of online games, communities, etc.
–Active household layer; Have bought LEGO sometime in the past. (bottom of pyramid)
Lead User
- people who LEGO actively engages with
1:1 Community
- people whose names and addresses LEGO knows
Connected Community
- people who have bought LEGO and have been either to a LEGO shop or park
Active Household
- people who have bought LEGO in the last 12 months
Covered Households
- people who have bought LEGO once
All Households
- those who have never bought LEGO
LEGO's Rules for Social Media
LEGO Ideas
LEGO's very own Social Media Platform (Lead Users)
Allows users to submit ideas
Receive feedback
Get votes
Their idea may be turned into a real LEGO set
Show Pine and Gilmore article figurel expllain that Lego alkready had the product and the experience but not the service which they imprved with relationship marketing. LLesson: cannot move to experiences if you have not transited to services Ex: Michlein from tire manfacturer to fleet management: manufacturing to service; tomorrow experience? how? could be a final exam question!
*
Confidence Benefits
Confidence in correct performance
Ability to trust the provider
Lower anxiety when purchasing
Knowing what to expect and receive
Social Benefits
Mutual recognition and friendship between service provider and customer
Familiarity
Special Treatment Benefits
Better price
Discounts not available to most customer
Extra services
Higher priority when there is a wait
Economic Benefits
Increased revenues
Reduced marketing and administrative costs
Regular revenue stream
Customer Behaviour Benefits
Strong word-of-mouth endorsements
Customer voluntary performance
Social benefits to other customers
Mentors to other customers
Human Resource Management Benefits
Easier jobs for employees
Social benefits for employees
Employee retention
*
e.g., mobile phone industry: handset replacement a common reason for subscribers discontinuing services – offer handset replacement programs
*
Target the right customer and match them to what firm can deliver
How do customer needs relate to operations elements?
How well can service personnel meet expectations of different types of customers?
Can company match or exceed competing services that are directed at same types of customers?
Focus on number of customers served as well as value of each customer
Some customers more profitable than others in the short term
Others may have room for long-term growth
“Right customers” are not always high spenders
Can come from a large group of people that no other supplier is serving well
The Platinum Tier
Most profitable customers
Typically heavy users
Not particularly price sensitive
Willing to invest in and try new offerings
Committed customers
The Gold Tier
Profitable (but less than Platinums)
Customer want price discounts that limit profit margins
Not as loyal
Heavy users, but may use multiple vendors rather than one focal company
The Iron Tier
Not essential to firm
Provide volume needed to use firm’s capacity
Spending levels, loyalty, and profit levels do not warrant special treatment
The Lead Tier
Cost the company money
Demand attention despite low levels of spending and profitability
Can be problem customers
*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOjSEW09NxE
*
*
*
*
Failure definition is very wide; everything below expectations is a failure. Different degrees of failures.
other findings indicating that most
customers have more negative feelings about an
organization after they go througli tlie senicereco\"
en' process.'
*
Failure definition is very wide; everything below expectations is a failure. Different degrees of failures.
other findings indicating that most
customers have more negative feelings about an
organization after they go througli tlie senicereco\"
en' process.'
*
*
*
Ted Levitt: "You don't know what yoit aren't going to get
until you don't get it."^ His cotntiient t"enects citstotnet"
s' unclear expectatiotis Ltliout tiiany sen'ices
and lielps explaiti why they do not cotnplain when
they ate dissatisfied. Otie way to ovetcome the
problem of imdear expectations is to impletnent
ser\'ice standards, which ate often fomtiiitnicated
through sen-ice guarantees.
Between stages 1 and 2: develop recovery standard where failure is fixed even if customers unaware of before they can report problem or complain: proactive approach to failure.
Stage 2: resolving customer problem even if no complain yet: ex resurant with 15 minutes warrantee will offer appetizier without asking if lunch served late.
*
BTW: 100-21 = 80% different dat source; same results should feel pretty confident the phenomneon of non complainant not intending to repurchase is that high.
Factors incluencing complaining behaviors:
Level of dissatisfaction
i.e., does it seem worth it?
Personal importance of the service
Cost of complaining
e.g., time and effort
Benefits of complaining
i.e., value of the outcome
Likelihood of resolution
i.e., belief that the problem will/can be solved satisfactorily
Available resources for making a complaint
Access to a means of registering a complaint
Knowing who is to blame for the problem
Demographics
e.g., younger and better educated people are more likely to complain
*
*
Barriers to cmplaining:
Inconvenience
(hard to find out the right complaint procedure; effort required)
Doubtful payoff
(uncertain if action will be taken by the firm to fix the problem)
Unpleasantness
(fear of being treated rudely; hassle and/or embarrassment)
*
*
*
Should a firm ‘screw up’ just a little so that it can ‘fix the problem’ superbly?
BUT
- Only a small percent of customers complain
- Service recovery must be of a very high standard
- Service recovery is expensive
Even though service recovery can improve satisfaction, it has not been found to increase purchase intentions or perceptions of the brand
Is a recovery attempt a double edged sword.
*
*
255 banking customers who went through 2 failures anbd 2 reciovery attemps; core and facilitating service failaures were experienced.
Failure similarity: ‘do not make the same mistake twice’
‘no good deed goes unpunished’
*
Recovery should be attempted even if nit complain has been received it is about fixing identified failires/
*
*
*
*
- Managers see the recovery process as a cost center rather than a profit center
- We forget the effects on the long term relationship.
- They stop investing in the recovery process
- Complex telephonic system
- Online complaint
- Difficulties to voice one’s concerns
- Call centers in India, Morocco, etc.
- Use inflexible scripts
*
*
Confidence Benefits
- Confidence in correct performance
- Ability to trust the provider
- Lower anxiety when purchasing
- Knowing what to expect and receive
Social Benefits
- Mutual recognition and friendship between service provider and customer
- Familiarity
Special Treatment Benefits
- Better price
- Discounts not available to most customer
- Extra services
- Higher priority when there is a wait
Economic Benefits
- Increased revenues
- Reduced marketing and administrative costs
- Regular revenue stream
Customer Behaviour Benefits
- Strong word-of-mouth endorsements
- Customer voluntary performance
- Social benefits to other customers
- Mentors to other customers
Human Resource Management Benefits
- Easier jobs for employees
- Social benefits for employees
- Employee retention
*
Confidence Benefits
- Confidence in correct performance
- Ability to trust the provider
- Lower anxiety when purchasing
- Knowing what to expect and receive
Social Benefits
- Mutual recognition and friendship between service provider and customer
- Familiarity
Special Treatment Benefits
- Better price
- Discounts not available to most customer
- Extra services
- Higher priority when there is a wait
Economic Benefits
- Increased revenues
- Reduced marketing and administrative costs
- Regular revenue stream
Customer Behaviour Benefits
- Strong word-of-mouth endorsements
- Customer voluntary performance
- Social benefits to other customers
- Mentors to other customers
Human Resource Management Benefits
- Easier jobs for employees
- Social benefits for employees
- Employee retention
*
172 respondenst over 4 waves of qustionnaires;’ respondets posted complainst on consumer affair.com or rippoff .com
Desire for revange decreases signifcaintly slower fo rhigh qulaity relationship than for low quality relationship; avoidance increases fatse for high quality relationship.
Relationship quality was measured via the 3 dimensions of trst, commitment, and social benefits.
4 waves with 2 weeks between waves; on-line complaint took place at least 6 weeks prior to first wave.
Do not disappoint your best customers.
This beg the question of what vengeance does to the relationship bond?
*
*
Record faliures in databse – Learn from mistakes
Do not treat failures as isolated incidents but as part of the service production process that failed. For instance Marriott report and collect systemtaic complains and decided not to have TV in bathrooms but additional ironing baorads as housekeeper reported it was a very frequent complaint.,
Forward failure information to individuals who made mistake or error; employee recovering the mistake is often not the same who made the actual mistake (billing error, restaurant meal not well cooked, etc.). Disneland: person who received the most complaintis the garbage collector.
Categorize customers; some companies automatically put a cusatomer who recently complain on a VIP list. Also, helps pointing out which customer is a demon – always complaining and never being satisfied with recovery.
From their data base of eventg (failures and recovery) Hampton Inn flag customers who have abused their guarrantee and when they wnat to book a room next time they recommend another hotel.
*
*
See chapter 5 on research methods; add qualitative and quantitative flavor to service encounter study or gap analysis. Expectyed range can be low and narrow but gap analysis does not revelas how many times performance was outside of the acceptable range
Even if performance below the acceptable range does not mean that failure was all the time; hence frequency and seveirity can only be known thourhgh an integration of service failure and recovery attempts data,
Important that falire and recovery data be disseminated to personnel who works at the sensitive touchpoints where recurrent failures occur.
United Airlines: road warriors business traveles, 37% of revenue but only 6% of travelers most
A year after the infamous United dragging incident, has anything changed for airline travelers?
This ad will end in 13 seconds
United Airlines settled with its passenger who was yanked from his seat to make room for airline crew members. (Reuters)
By Lori Aratani
April 9, 2018
In the year since a Kentucky doctor was violently dragged off a United Airlines flight after refusing to give up his seat, the number of passengers bumped from their flights has dropped significantly and airlines have reduced overbooking. Even so, consumer advocates and the lawyer who represented David Dao said they are disappointed by how little has changed in the wake of the incident that drew worldwide condemnation and calls to boycott the airline.
“We have seen much less improvement than we had hoped for,” said Thomas Demetrio, the Chicago-based lawyer who represented Dao in his case against United. “The airline industry is not closely regulated, and I thought this would change things.”
[A man wouldn’t give up his seat on a United flight, so he was dragged off screaming]
Added William J. McGee, aviation adviser for Consumers Union: “Any changes that airlines made are, frankly, not very impressive.”
Dao was a passenger aboard a flight from Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport to Louisville on April 9, 2017. Passengers had already boarded the flight when a United representative asked for volunteers to give up their seats. The airline said it needed the seats to make room for crew members who needed to be in Louisville so they could staff another flight the next morning. Two other passengers gave up their seats, but when United officials approached Dao, he declined.
Airline police were summoned and Dao was dragged off the plane. Video taken by other passengers and shared widely on social media showed Dao screaming as he was removed from the aircraft and then again when he suddenly returned to the plane, looking confused, his faced bloodied.
The video fueled outrage in the United States and around the world and there were calls for a boycott. United’s stock price tumbled and chief executive Oscar Munoz’s attempts to tamp down the furor only made the situation worse.
Less than a month after the incident, the airline reached a confidential settlement with Dao.
United officials say they have learned lessons from the incident.
“Flight 3411 was a defining moment for United Airlines and it is our responsibility — our mission — to make sure we as a company and all of our 90,000 employees learn from that experience,” United spokesman Charles Hobart said. “The changes we have implemented better serve our customers while empowering our employees.”
The airline outlined a 10-point plan they say puts customers first. Among the changes: Travelers who voluntarily give up their seats are eligible to receive up to $10,000 in travel certificates. The airline — as well as other carriers — also promised to reexamine its policy of overbooking — selling more seats than are available on a flight. And officials said airline personnel would no longer call outside law enforcement officials to remove passengers from flights unless it was a safety or security matter.
[Embattled United chief said he felt “shame” when he watched video of man being dragged from plane]
After the United incident, other major airlines made similar pledges. In hearings on Capitol Hill, airline executives said they would stop overbooking flights, and major carriers including American and Delta increased the compensation for passengers who are bumped from their flights.
Lawmakers introduced a flurry of legislation, but in the end, airlines were largely left to police themselves. The Transportation Department, which also investigated Dao’s removal, declined to fine United, saying that although the airline violated some rules regarding the overbooking of flights, investigators found no evidence of race or nationality-based discrimination in the incident. United, they concluded, had not engaged in a pattern of rule-breaking that would warrant a fine.
[Lawyer for United passenger: Dragging was more horrifying than when he fled Vietnam]
Still, industry executives say progress has been made. They point to figures from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics that show that the number of passengers bumped from flights in 2017 was the lowest in decades. According to BTS, carriers posted a bumping rate of 0.34 per 10,000 passengers. It was also a decline from 2016 of 0.62 per 10,000 passengers.
The number of passenger complaints however, increased 1.3 percent in 2017, to 18,148, from the previous year’s total of 17,908.
McGee, of Consumers Union, noted that statistics collected by the federal government don’t always provide a complete picture of traveler sentiment. For example, he said the federal statistics don’t include complaints made directly to airlines.
“The good news is that DOT has a database where they will accept complaints,” he said. “The bad news is that very few people realize that.”
Airlines, including United, have continued to come under fire for their treatment of travelers.
In October, the NAACP issued a “travel advisory” urging travelers, particularly African Americans, to rethink whether they should use American Airlines. NAACP officials cited a “troubling pattern of disturbing incidents” in issuing the advisory. American Airlines officials, who met with NAACP representatives, emphasized that they were committed to providing “a positive, safe travel experience for everyone who flies with us.”
Earlier this year, United again found itself back on the defensive after a 1o-month-old puppy suffocated aboard one of its flights. A flight attendant for the flight from Houston to New York allegedly told the pet’s owner, who was traveling with the dog and her two children, that the animal had to be placed in its carrier and placed in an overhead bin. Witnesses said the flight attendant told the woman that if she didn’t comply, the family would not be allowed to travel. The woman placed the puppy in its carrier in the overhead bin, and when the flight arrived in New York the puppy was no longer breathing. The airline took responsibility and pledged to reexamine its policies regarding animals.
Even so, at a time when record numbers of people are flying, industry executives say they are sensitive to the criticism.
“U.S. airlines remain steadfast in our commitment to improving the customer service experience for travelers and ensuring that they receive the respect and dignity that they deserve,” said Alison McAfee, spokeswoman for Airlines for America, a trade group that represents some of the nation’s largest carriers. “The industry continues to work and invest in our ultimate goal of providing a safe, efficient and enjoyable travel experience each and every day.”
This post has been updated to clarify that the NAACP issued a travel advisory for American Airlines.
*
See chapter 5 on research methods; add qualitative and quantitative flavor to service encounter study or gap analysis. Expectyed range can be low and narrow but gap analysis does not revelas how many times performance was outside of the acceptable range
Even if performance below the acceptable range does not mean that failure was all the time; hence frequency and seveirity can only be known thourhgh an integration of service failure and recovery attempts data,
Important that falire and recovery data be disseminated to personnel who works at the sensitive touchpoints where recurrent failures occur.
United Airlines: road warriors business traveles, 37% of revenue but only 6% of travelers most
*
Still today 65% of complaints initiated witjh front line workers.
Study: 350 complainers who purchased on oine electronic equipment from a US store.
Companies tend to attract, hire and retain people whose values are consistent with the company,s goal.
Customer extra role: the extent to which the service agent exeeced their expecations in resolving their complaint.
*
*
American Express pays careful
attention to the job satisfaction of its in\"estment
advisers, since it estimates that more than 30 percent
of an adviser'.s client.s would defect if the advi.ser left
the company.
Every employee has up to $2000 discretionary amount to be spent on solving guest problems or make their experience unforgettable. Ex: building a woowen path for a husband and wife who is in a wheelchair so they can have dinner on the beach. The physicla symbol of the card embodies the vaklues of the organization and make them more vidi and more memorable.
*
What is guarranteed is the outocme more than a specific service: 100% satisfaction.
A good guarantee forces the company to focus on its customers.
An effective guarantee sets clear standards for the organisation
A good guarantee generates immediate and relevant feedback from customers
When the guarantee is invoked there is an instant
opportunity to recover
Information generated through the guarantee
can be tracked and integrated into continuous
improvement efforts
A service guarantee reduces customers’ sense
of risk and builds confidence in the
organisation
Hampton Inn hotels, for example,
realized $11 million in additional revenue
from the implementation of it.s .ser-
\ ice guarantee and .scored the highest
customer retention rate in the industry.-
*
Unconditional
The guarantee should make its promise unconditionally
Meaningful
The firm should guarantee elements of the service that are important to the customer
The payout should cover fully the customer’s dissatisfaction
Easy to Understand
For customers and employees
Easy to Invoke
The firm should eliminate hoops or red tape in the way of accessing or collecting on the guarantee
*
(realign expectation with performance)
*
*
*