The Strategic Quality Management Implementation Plan
Strategic Quality Management Implementation Plan Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 168 points |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Application of Knowledge |
60 to 56 points The Plan is well organized and complete, with a clear, well-developed organizational context, quality statement, identification of quality problem/process to improve, and clear goals and objectives.
|
55 to 52 points The Plan is organized and complete, with a well-developed organizational context, quality statement, identification of quality problem/process to improve, and goals and objectives.
|
51 to 1 points The Plan is not well organized and/or complete, and may lack a clear organizational context, quality statement, identification of quality problem/process to improve, and goals and objectives.
|
0 points No plan is provided. |
|
Synthesis of Knowledge |
70 to 66 points The plan presents an appropriate model and methodology that fits the scenario well, well-developed structure and scope, measurable performance metrics, a reasonable time frame, and effective summative comments.
|
65 to 61 points The plan presents a model and methodology that overall fits the scenario, well-developed structure and scope, performance metrics, a time frame, and summative comments.
|
60 to 1 points The plan presents an appropriate model and methodology that firs the scenario well, well-developed structure and scope, measurable performance metrics, a reasonable time frame, and effective summative comments.
|
0 points The paper does not present a model.
|
|
Literature Review |
38 to 36 points The literature review directly supports the process improvement tool selected. The literature review presents research in an engaging manner, with dynamic integration and presentation of findings. |
35 to 33 points The literature review supports the process improvement tool selected. The literature review presents research in an effective manner, with some integration and clear presentation of findings. |
32 to 1 points The literature review does not always support the process improvement tool selected. The literature review presents research but does not integrate the findings. |
0 points The paper does not present a literature review.
|
|
Structure 72 points |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Grammar and Structure |
30 to 28 points No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise and word choice is appropriate.
|
27 to 26 points Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient and word choice is adequate.
|
25 to 1 points Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good.
|
0 points Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor.
|
|
APA Style |
10 points Citations, references and overall format are in current APA style. Cover page and References are correctly formatted. Paper is written in a clear, consistent font.
|
9 points Citations, references and overall format are in current APA style. Cover page and References are correctly formatted overall. Paper is written in a clear, consistent font.
|
8 to 1 points Citations, references and overall format are not always in current APA style. Cover page and References are not consistently formatted.
|
0 points APA formatting is not followed.
|
|
Materials/Resources |
32 to 30 points At least 15 scholarly resources (from peer-reviewed journals) are included and are directly related to the management topic. A variety of respected sources is evident. |
29 to 28 points At least 15 scholarly resources (from peer-reviewed journals) are included and are related to the management topic. Some variety is evident. |
27 to 1 points Not all of the required scholarly resources (from peer-reviewed journals) are included and may not be related to the management topic. |
0 points Academic materials are not used.
|