The Strategic Quality Management Implementation Plan

profilerayjay
StrategiceQualGradingRubric.docx

Strategic Quality Management Implementation Plan Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content 168 points

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Application of Knowledge

60 to 56 points

The Plan is well organized and complete, with a clear, well-developed organizational context, quality statement, identification of quality problem/process to improve, and clear goals and objectives.

55 to 52 points

The Plan is organized and complete, with a well-developed organizational context, quality statement, identification of quality problem/process to improve, and goals and objectives.

51 to 1 points

The Plan is not well organized and/or complete, and may lack a clear organizational context, quality statement, identification of quality problem/process to improve, and goals and objectives.

0 points

No plan is provided.

Synthesis of Knowledge

70 to 66 points

The plan presents an appropriate model and methodology that fits the scenario well, well-developed structure and scope, measurable performance metrics, a reasonable time frame, and effective summative comments.

65 to 61 points

The plan presents a model and methodology that overall fits the scenario, well-developed structure and scope, performance metrics, a time frame, and summative comments.

60 to 1 points

The plan presents an appropriate model and methodology that firs the scenario well, well-developed structure and scope, measurable performance metrics, a reasonable time frame, and effective summative comments.

0 points

The paper does not present a model.

Literature Review

38 to 36 points

The literature review directly supports the process improvement tool selected. The literature review presents research in an engaging manner, with dynamic integration and presentation of findings.

35 to 33 points

The literature review supports the process improvement tool selected. The literature review presents research in an effective manner, with some integration and clear presentation of findings.

32 to 1 points

The literature review does not always support the process improvement tool selected. The literature review presents research but does not integrate the findings.

0 points

The paper does not present a literature review.

Structure 72 points

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Grammar and Structure

30 to 28 points

No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise and word choice is appropriate.

27 to 26 points

Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient and word choice is adequate.

25 to 1 points

Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good.

0 points

Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor.

APA Style

10 points

Citations, references and overall format are in current APA style. Cover page and References are correctly formatted. Paper is written in a clear, consistent font.

9 points

Citations, references and overall format are in current APA style. Cover page and References are correctly formatted overall. Paper is written in a clear, consistent font.

8 to 1 points

Citations, references and overall format are not always in current APA style. Cover page and References are not consistently formatted.

0 points

APA formatting is not followed.

Materials/Resources

32 to 30 points

At least 15 scholarly resources (from peer-reviewed journals) are included and are directly related to the management topic. A variety of respected sources is evident.

29 to 28 points

At least 15 scholarly resources (from peer-reviewed journals) are included and are related to the management topic. Some variety is evident.

27 to 1 points

Not all of the required scholarly resources (from peer-reviewed journals) are included and may not be related to the management topic.

0 points

Academic materials are not used.