Write-Up_1page
Vallabh Sambamurthy & Robert W. Zmud
Guiding the Digital Transformation of Organizations - Second Edition
© 2017 Legerity Digital Press
All rights reserved. �is book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher, except for the use of brief quotations in a book review.
Legerity Digital Press LLC For more information, please visit: www.ldpress.com, email [email protected] or call toll free 855-855-9868.
ISBN 978-0-9857955-9-7
Strategic Focus
Chapter
11
Guiding the Digital Transformation of Organizations By Vallabh Sambamurthy and Robert W. Zmud
Second Edition Copyright © 2017
First Edition Copyright © 2012
All rights reserved. No part of this publication shall be reproduced, distributed, or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
recording, or by any information retrieval system without the prior written permission of the
publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain
other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, email the
publisher at: [email protected].
Published by Legerity Digital Press, LLC
A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress.
ISBN 978-0-9857955-9-7
Although every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, the
publisher and author assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. Neither is any
liability assumed for damages resulting from the use of this information contained herein.
Ordering information:
For all ordering inquiries, please visit www.ldpress.com, email [email protected] or
call toll free at 855-855-9868. Special discounts are available on bulk purchases by
academic institutions, associations, corporations, and others.
Printed in the United States of America.
Cover Illustration by Aaron Z. Williams
231
Chapter 11. Strategic Focus
The abilities to recognize valuable digital opportunities and to explain to others
the rationales that underlay these opportunities are important skills for all managers.
Twenty-five years ago, relatively few senior managers found themselves involved
with digital investment decisions as such decisions, to a large extent, were handled
by organizations’ technology executives and managers. But, things have
dramatically changed.69 In 1987, for example, U.S. corporations’ investment in
digital technologies per employee averaged around $1,500. By 2004, that amount
had more than tripled to over $5,000 per employee. Today, U.S. corporations spend
more on digital technologies each year as they do on offices, warehouses and
equipment.
Why this increased spending on digital technologies? There are two rather
obvious answers. First, the traditional form of industrial economies, the pipeline
ecosystem, has been extensively digitized and digitalized. Digitization refers to the
purely technical processes associated with converting sensed and captured data into
binary digits, storing and transmitting these data, and both performing operations on
these data and storing/transmitting the outcomes of these operations; and,
digitalization refers to the application of digitization within organizations and the
social and economic contexts within which these organizations are embedded. As
depicted in Figure 11-1, a pipeline ecosystem finds a producer (actually, many
competing producers) offering products and services to a consumer community
69 A. McAfee, “Mastering the Three Worlds of Information Technology,” Harvard
Business Review, November/December 2006, p. 141.
232
(typically comprised of multiple consumer segments) and fashioning a linear value
stream involving numerous upstream (e.g., raw material suppliers, component
suppliers, etc.) and downstream (e.g., distributors, retailers, etc.) participants.
Increasingly, the operational and managerial processes being executed across this
value stream are digitalized and hosted on business platforms, which in turn are
enabled through technology services provided through digital platforms.
Figure 11-1 The Pipeline Ecosystem
ConsumersProducer IntermediariesIntermediaries
Markets
Material & Component Suppliers
Markets
Upstream Midstream Downstream
Second, digitization and digitalization are spawning new forms of economic
organization, the most significant of which is the network ecosystem. As depicted in
Figure 11-2, a network ecosystem finds an organization – referred to as the
network orchestrator – designing, operating and evolving a market platform
(comprised of digital platforms and business platforms) that brings together multiple
communities to exchange information, products and services. Within a network
233
ecosystem, the vast majority of market-related, participant interactions (within a
community and between communities) occur through this market platform.
Figure 11-2 The Network Ecosystem
Producer Network
Consumer Network
Market
Network Orchestrator
Markets
Intermediaries
Material & Component Suppliers
Markets
Upstream Midstream Downstream
The extensive digitalization of pipeline ecosystems and of network ecosystems
has resulted in exceptional competitive successes being enjoyed by organizations
possessing finely-tuned digitalization capabilities. However, spending on
digitalization has reached heights where it cannot be ignored by organizations’ most
senior executives. Unrestrained spending on digitalization is most certainly a thing
of the past, if it ever existed at all.
Two researchers, Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson, after analyzing data
about digitalization investment and organization performance, have made two
particularly striking observations useful in grasping how and when digital investments
234
produce significant value for the investing organization.70 First, more-digitalized
firms tend to operate in more-turbulent business environments. When you think
about it, this is quite intuitive as organizations facing turbulent environments are
likely to stand the most to gain from the speed and response advantages of
digitalization. Second, McAfee and Brynjolfsson found:
With more-digitalized organizations, higher-performing organizations achieved about a 50% higher average gross margin than lower-performing
organizations.
With less-digitalized organizations, higher-performing organizations achieved
about a 20% higher average gross margin than lower-performing organizations.
Clearly, the performance implications from making the right digitalization investment
decisions at the right time are much more important for more-digitalized
organizations than for less-digitalized organizations.
What should you take away from these observations? First, not all of today’s
organizations need to invest in risky digitalization projects. If your competitive
environment is relatively stable (i.e., products, services, processes, facilities and
equipment, and market participants change rather slowly), you are generally better
off delaying a digital investment until other organizations have convincingly
demonstrated the value of the investment. Second, while digitalization can deliver
significant performance gains, the majority of these gains flow to those organizations
that have invested most heavily in digitalization. Importantly, the organizations
investing most heavily in digitalization are likely to have developed strong digitization
capabilities and, perhaps more important, strong digitalization capabilities.
70 A. McAfee and E. Brynjolfsson, “Investing in the IT that Makes a Competitive
Difference,” Harvard Business Review, July/August 2008, pp. 98-107.
235
Digitization capabilities refer to an organization’s readiness to: apply digital
technologies, digitized content and technology services; manage digital platforms;
and, attract, manage and retain highly-skilled technology professionals.
Digitalization capabilities refer to an organization’s readiness to attract, manage
and retain individuals highly skilled in: identifying digitalization opportunities,
building and assessing business cases for digitalization investments, implementing
funded digitalization investments, managing business platforms, and achieving the
strategic aims sought through digitization.
This chapter covers what might be considered the most crucial of these
digitalization capabilities – conceptualizing and articulating the strategic focus of a
digital investment. If the proponents of a digitalization investment idea are unable
to clearly describe both their intentions and the target of these intentions, then it is
unlikely that others will be able to contribute in significant ways to the co-creation of
a digitalization proposal. Organizations lacking individuals possessing this capability
are likely to experience significant difficulties in beginning, let alone successfully
completing, digitalization initiatives. The topics covered include:
The IT Productivity Paradox
Strategic Focus
Impacting Overall Financial Performance
The IT Productivity Paradox
Despite organizations’ ever-increasing investment in digitalization, consistent
evidence of positive returns from these investments has not always been apparent.
In fact, quite mixed evidence existed until the mid-1990s, which led economists to
236
coin the term IT productivity paradox after Robert Solow observed, “We see
evidence of the computer age everywhere except in the productivity statistics.”71
A productivity gain occurs when it becomes possible to carry out a given
amount of work with fewer resources. Evidence of economy-wide productivity gains
from digitization are all around us. Think of your favorite airline, bank or grocer:
Airlines offer online reservations and have built business processes for ticketless travel with self-service check-in.
Retail banks have used their investments in ATMs and online banking to drive down the unit cost of operations in customer-facing activities.
Retail groceries have negotiated electronic replenishment processes with their suppliers to dramatically reduce stock-outs and the cost of moving stock from the supplier through distribution centers to the retail store.
Most of these productivity gains have greatly benefited the consumer. Examples of
improvements in consumer welfare include: 24x7 product/service availability,
lower prices, less chance of a desired product being out-of-stock when you attempt
to purchase it, more product/service choice, more information (prices, availability,
reviews, etc.) about products and services, and a greater tailoring of products and
services to your specific needs.
But, many, if not most, of these gains in consumer welfare occurred without
corresponding profitability gains by the organizations investing in digitalization.
Consider, for example, the first firm in an industry to introduce a 24x7 online
customer support capability. The innovating firm may initially observe improvements
in customer satisfaction, sales growth and market share. However, if competitors
quickly take imitative actions, then a competitive equilibrium soon returns: customer
71 R. Solow, “We'd Better Watch Out,” New York Times Book Review, July 12, 1987, p.
36.
237
satisfaction, sales growth and market share all return to where they were before the
innovating firm transformed the market space by providing the 24x7 online customer
support capability. Long-term, the only clear winner seems to be the consumer.
Since the mid-1990s, however, the accumulating body of economic evidence
has shown that superior decisions about when, where and how to invest in
digitalization can improve an organization’s performance across areas as diverse as
cost structures, sales growth, profit margins and stock prices. While numerous
factors are involved in explaining organization-specific performance gains, two
factors stand out above all.
First, organizations making superior digitalization decisions have invested
heavily to build and interconnect large stores of digitized content and an increasing
number of digitalized operational and managerial processes. With more content
being digitized and accessed by digitalized processes, a tipping point is reached where
new sources of business value, heretofore unavailable, arise. For example, by
bringing diverse sets of data and analytic tools to a decision-making situation, the
decision situation can be more comprehensively assessed – producing significantly
enhanced outcomes. And, by seamlessly interconnecting digitalized processes (e.g.,
interconnecting new product development processes, market research processes,
and manufacturing design processes), not only are each of the processes enhanced
but the combined effects can produce outcomes which previously were unattainable
or even unimagined. Each additional digital investment unveils a string of new
possibilities.
Second, organizations making superior decisions about digitalization have
invested heavily to increase their digitalization capabilities. As digitalization
238
capabilities develop broadly and deeply across an organization, the organization’s
managers and professionals are increasingly able to combine their abilities and
experiences to identify and assess digital investments, to make savvy decisions about
which of these investments to fund, and to successfully implement the funded
investments such that anticipated benefits are realized. These digitalization
capabilities largely hinge on individuals’ abilities to envision the strategic aims sought
by a proposed digitalization investment. We examine these strategic aims next.
Strategic Focus
Adapting and extending a framework introduced initially by researchers Jeanne
Ross and Cynthia Beath, Table 11-1 identifies the four strategic focuses that are the
targets of most digitalization investments, the value drivers of each of these strategic
foci, and associated performance metrics. We begin by providing brief overviews of
the key concepts used in this table:
A business model reflects an organization’s value-creating strategy.
The digitized content and digitalized functionalities enabling business models are hosted on business platforms.
Business platforms are enabled through the technology services provided by digital platforms.
A value driver refers to a core factor underlying anticipated performance gains.
239
Table 11-1 Digitalization Strategic Aims
Strategic Focus Value Drivers Performance Metrics
Digital Platform Operations & Technology
Services
• Digital technology performance-price ratios
• Digitization capabilities • Digitalization capabilities
• Costs of operations • Quality of services (security,
responsiveness, reliability, availability, scalability)
Business Platform Efficiency
• Digitization capabilities • Digitalization capabilities • Business platform first-order learning
• Transaction cycle times • Sales & general administrative costs • Inventory costs & ratios • Customer/participant support costs
Business Platform
Effectiveness
• Digitization capabilities • Digitalization capabilities • Business platform first-order learning • Market ecosystem first-order learning
• Sales revenue & market share • Customer/participant loyalty & share
of wallet
Business Model
Innovation
• Digitization capabilities • Digitalization capabilities • Business platform first-order learning • Market ecosystem first-order learning • Business platform second-order
learning • Market ecosystem second-order
learning
• Rate of new product/service introductions
• New product/services sales growth & gross margin
• Rate at which new communities are engaged
Digital Platform Operations and Technology Services
Digital investments are almost always, to some extent at least, aimed at
improving digital platform operations and services. Digital platform operations
refers to activities involved in planning, designing, running, managing and evolving
the technology services required to enable and support an organizations’ business
platforms, that in turn host organizations’ operational and managerial processes.
Examples of digital platform operational activities include: managing and operating
hundreds or thousands of servers, managing data storage devices, managing and
operating local area networks, etc. Technology services refer to the digitized
functionalities and the technical support provided to an organization’s employees
and, increasingly, to its customers and suppliers. Basic examples of such services
include: electronic mail, document copying and printing, help desks, website design,
establishing network interconnections, Internet-enabled messaging and chatting, etc.
240
The incessant advances occurring with digital technologies are relentlessly
increasing these technologies’ performance-price ratios: processor speeds and
memory sizes increase, while prices decrease; storage device capacity increases,
while access times and prices decrease; communications bandwidth and speed
increase, while prices decrease, etc. As a result, organizations have found it
advantageous to regularly upgrade or replace their installed digital platforms. In
addition to upgrading and replacing digital platforms, digitalization leaders also invest
to improve the knowledge and skills of their technology professionals and,
consequently, their digitization and digitalization capabilities – enabling future
improvements aimed at digital platforms, business platforms and business models.
The distinction between investing in new digital technologies and investing to
improve digitization/digitalization capabilities is critical as it makes clear the
distinction between the value to be derived directly from installing a new digital
technology (such as new storage devices or more sophisticated data management
software) and the value obtained from deploying the digital technology in smarter
and more creative ways. Saying that you have developed a particular capability
implies that you are now able to bring together and apply a particular set of resources
to achieve a desired outcome. Most organizations are more or less equal in their
ability to acquire and install digital technologies. However, organizations are not
equally blessed with the abilities to apply these technologies in a superior manner
and, in doing so, dramatically improve an organization’s business platforms and
business models.
241
Business Platform Efficiency
A second target of digitalization investments is business platform
efficiency, e.g., improving the cycle times and costs associated with one or more of
the business processes being hosted on a business platform. A specific investment
initiative might be targeted at the platform itself (affecting all of the platform’s hosted
business processes) or at a limited set of these hosted business processes.
A business process refers to a sequence of work tasks that converts inputs
into outputs, and these work-task sequences can involve operational activities,
managerial activities, or both. Business process inputs and outputs can be digital in
nature, non-digital in nature, or some combination of both. Generally, business
platform efficiency is increased as more of these inputs and outputs are digitized.
Business processes consist of operating procedures and business rules.
Operating procedures specify each of the tasks that comprise a business process
(e.g., obtaining required inputs, producing specified outputs, the nature of the
decisions and actions to be taken in transforming inputs into outputs, whom is
involved with these decisions and actions, etc.), as well as the relationships among
these tasks (e.g., which tasks must occur before other tasks can be started, how a
task’s outputs serve as inputs to other tasks, etc.). Business rules describe the
conditions that must be met when taking actions or making decisions. For example,
the creation of a purchase requisition might involve the following business rules:
If the purchase amount is less than $500, then the requisition does not need
to be approved by a department head.
If the purchase amount is greater than $500, but less than $5,000, then the requisition needs the approval of a department head.
If the purchase amount is greater than $5,000, then it must be approved by
242
both a department head and a divisional finance director.
Business process efficiency gains are achieved by automating (i.e., replacing
humans with digitalized solutions) and rationalizing (i.e., eliminating processing
steps, waste, errors, delays, etc.) operating procedures and business rules. Table
11-2 describes a business platform critical to the core business models of FedEx, Dell,
Walmart and Southwest Airlines. Exploiting their exceptional digitization capabilities
and digitalization capabilities, all four of these organizations fine-tuned the efficiency
of these business platforms and, as a consequence, obtained industry-leading
positions.
Table 11-2 Business Platform Efficiency Enhancement Examples
Company Business Platform Description
FedEx Package Tracking
Placing a digitized identifier on each package, installing readers throughout the logistics network, capturing the identifier & a time stamp for package movements, and maintaining these data in an accessible database.
Dell Customer Order
Scheduling
Specifying component delivery & assembly timings for a customer order and communicating these timings to suppliers & logistics partners.
Walmart Retail Store Shelf
Replenishment
Capturing & archiving product purchase activity at the retail-store level, and analyzing these purchase data to determine the replenishment cycles for restocking products at specific retail stores.
Southwest Airlines
Aircraft Ground- Handling
(Turnaround)
Maintaining accurate & timely data on aircraft arrival/departure times & passenger loads, and then scheduling (and rescheduling) aircraft servicing requirements based on these data.
Initiatives that apply digitalization to improve business platform efficiency
most often engage participants in first-order learning with regard to the targeted
business platform. First-order learning engages participants in refining their
understandings – and, as a result, the collective understanding – of a business
process, but does not substantially change the assumptions and foundational
243
reasoning on which these understandings are based. Consider, for example, a
customer support business platform. First-order learning takes an organization’s
existing approach to customer support and strives to incrementally improve this
current approach as knowledge is gained about what is working well and what is not
working well. It is only natural in a well-run customer support operation to expect
customer support staff to identify problems, find solutions for these problems, and
then embed these solutions within ongoing customer support work activities. Such
incremental knowledge accumulation represents the learning curve often observed
with repetitive work activities.
Business Platform Effectiveness
A third target of digitalization investments is business platform
effectiveness, or improving the quality of the platform (e.g., convenience,
availability, security, etc.) or the quality of one or more of the hosted business
processes (e.g., ease-of-use, accuracy, responsiveness, comprehensiveness,
reliability, etc.). The value drivers for business platform effectiveness tend to be
similar to those affecting business platform efficiency, with the addition of first-order
learning about the market ecosystem within which a business operates. Learning
about a market ecosystem involves better understanding the natures of the products
and services being exchanged within the ecosystem and better understanding both
the natures of each of the communities (e.g., consumers, producers, suppliers,
intermediaries, competitors, etc.) participating in the ecosystem and the motivations
that underlie community members’ decisions to participate. Referring back to Table
11-2, FedEx, Dell, Walmart, and Southwest Airlines have each proven to be
244
exceptional in their abilities to apply digitalization to improve the effectiveness of the
identified business platforms.
Business Model Innovation
The fourth target of digitalization investments involves organizations’ business
models – more precisely, initiatives focused on disrupting one or more market spaces
through business model innovation. A business model is a simplified and
aggregated conceptualization of the value-creating, profitability-sustaining activities
of an organization. Regardless of whether an organization is one of many producers
competing in the same market ecosystem or a network orchestrator that has
fashioned its own market ecosystem (typically within a market space populated by
competing market ecosystems), the organization’s business model consists of four
distinct elements:
A value proposition defines how an organization will distinguish itself within the markets that it has chosen to participate through its ability to
attract consumers (for organizations competing in pipeline ecosystems) or the members of participating communities (for organizations competing in network ecosystems).
A profit model consists of revenue and cost models. Revenue models describe where, when and how revenue streams materialize. Cost models
describe the costs to be borne in producing the revenue streams associated with the value proposition and how these costs will be controlled to provide requisite levels of profitability.
Core capabilities refer to the tangible resources (e.g., facilities, machinery, digital devices, etc.) and intangible resources (e.g., people, knowledge,
operational and managerial processes, patents, architectures, etc.) needed to successfully implement the value proposition and profit model.
Dynamic capabilities refer to the intangible resources (e.g., people,
knowledge, relationships, managerial processes, architectures, etc.) needed to (1) sense and assess opportunities for business model innovation and (2)
successfully implement these innovations.
245
Figures 11-3 and 11-4, respectively, depict a business model applied by Apple and
by Walmart (both of which are pipeline organizations); and, Tables 11-3 and 11-4
depict business models applied by TopCoder and Metropia (both of which are network
organizations).
Figure 11-3
Apple’s Business Model for the Consumer Smart Device Market
Value Proposition Profit Model
Core Capabilities
Dynamic Capabilities
• Value-unit: Consumer smart digital devices • Consumer: Technically-receptive &
technically-savvy segments of the personal smart device market
• Innovative & trend-setting products • Seamless access to content across all digital
media
• High product prices driven by stimulating demand and by limiting supply
• Moderate manufacturing & marketing costs • High margins
• Brand management • Technology patents • Product design & product architecture design • Tightly-directed sales & marketing • Tightly-controlled manufacturing & logistics,
performed by third-parties • Relationships with content providers and
with manufacturing & logistics partners
• Knowledge of new digital technologies • Knowledge of evolving desires of first-
adopter consumers • Knowledge of new digital media and of new
means for accessing digital media • Knowledge of product designers & architects • Knowledge of content management
architects
246
Figure 11-4 Walmart’s Business Model for the Household Goods Retail Market
Value Proposition
Profit Model
Core Capabilities
Dynamic Capabilities
• Value-unit: Household groceries & products
• Consumer: Cost-sensitive segment of the mass market
• ‘Everyday Low Prices’ • Retail store availability of a broad range
of products, enabling one-stop shopping
• Low prices, low costs • Moderate margin • High volume, high product
turnover
• Store site selection & store layout design • Tailor local inventory to local market • Shelf-space optimization (merchandizing &
replenishment) • Logistics optimization • Supplier relationships
• Knowledge of new digital technologies • Knowledge of evolving shopping-experience
desires of mass-market consumers • Knowledge of digitalization trends &
innovations in retail-store operations and in logistics
• Logistics designers & technologists • Retail store designers & technologists
Table 11-3
TopCoder’s Business Model
Business Model Element
Description
Client Community Value Proposition
Obtain quality code (e.g., tested against specifications, secure, etc.) within agreed-on schedule and budget.
Client Community Profit Model
Clients pay subscription fee. Clients provide contest incentives (payments to winning
developers).
Developer Community Value Proposition
Earn income, acquire new skills, demonstrate skills and interact with forward-looking technologists.
Developer Community Profit Model
No associated revenue stream (the developer community is the subsidy-side of this network ecosystem).
Core Capabilities
Software development & software development management. Translating software development projects into contests. Contest design & fulfillment. Acquiring, developing and retaining community participants. Creating a sense of community for participants.
Dynamic Capabilities Sensing & identifying software development trends &
innovations. Sensing & identifying new participant sources.
247
Table 11-4 Metropia’s Business Model
Business Model Element Description
Commuter Value Proposition Provide optimal mobility solutions for going from point A to point B. Provide reward points for contributing to the common good .
Commuter Profit Model Subscription fees & transaction fees.
Provider Value Proposition Gain exposure with the commuter community. Gain revenue from servicing the commuter community.
Provider Profit Model Negotiated mobility services costs.
Merchant Value Proposition Build reputation with commuter community.
Merchant Profit Model Exchange goods/services for reward points.
Government Agency Value Proposition
Enhance commuting common good. Obtain mobility-related data. Obtain knowledge from Big Data analytics.
Government Agency Profit Model
Revenue (from developing, launching & enhancing local market platforms).
Licenses fees (from (Big Data/analytics products & services).
Core Capabilities Traffic optimization & Big Data analytics. Interconnect market platform with government/provider processes. Relationship management (all communities).
Dynamic Capabilities Sensing and identifying new mobility services and providers. Sensing and identifying new government regulations.
Devising innovative twists to an existing business model (e.g., Amazon’s one-
click purchase feature) or conceiving of a truly innovative business model (e.g.,
Google’s search platform) requires a special kind of thinking – popularly termed out-
of-the-box thinking – about digital platforms, about business platforms, about market
ecosystems, and about how digitalization can be creatively applied to disrupt the
nature of competition within a market ecosystem. This type of learning is referred
to as second-order learning, where pre-existing ideas and assumptions are up-
ended and looked at with a fresh and open mind. Well-known and very successful
outcomes of inspirational second-order learning within pipeline ecosystems can be
observed with FedEx’s overnight delivery business model, Dell’s build-to-order
business model, Walmart’s Everyday Low Prices business model, and Southwest
Airline’s no-frills, short-haul, have-fun business model. Table 11-5 describes these
four business model innovations. And, just about every early entrant into a network
248
ecosystem market space – think Airbnb, Kickstarter, Uber, TaskRabbit, Groupon, etc.
– has applied an innovative business model.
Table 11-5 Four Pipeline Organization Business Model Innovations
Company
Business Model Elements
Customer Value Proposition
Profit Model Enabling Capabilities
FedEx • Overnight delivery • Guaranteed
delivery
• High margins • Controlled logistic
costs • Customer self-service
• Package visibility • Logistical coordination • Data management
Dell
• Customer- configured products
• Low-cost products
• Competitive prices • Minimal inventories • Industry-leading
cash management
• Product design • Supply chain coordination • Supplier/partner
collaboration
Walmart • Everyday low prices • Product availability
• Industry-leading cost structures
• Sales volume
• Local store merchandising • Supply chain coordination • Supplier/partner
collaboration
Southwest Airlines
• Low fares • Satisfying customer
experience
• Competitive fares • Industry-leading cost
structures • Customer self-service
• Aircraft/terminal operations • Route portfolio
management • Employee relations
Impacting Overall Financial Performance
The end-game objective sought from all organization investments is to improve
the organization’s bottom line: a larger profit for a for-profit organization and a
balanced budget (along with a larger rainy-day fund) for a non-profit organization.
The potential for realizing significant financial gains from digitalization investments
will generally be greater with initiatives that are larger in size and in scope.
Realistically, though, just how much overall financial improvement might be expected
from digitalization investments having differing strategic foci?
Figure 11-5 offers general guidelines about the likelihood of an organization
experiencing an overall financial performance impact from digital investments. In
Figure 11-5, the thicker the arrow going towards Overall Financial Performance, the
249
greater is the likelihood that an impact will be realized. The successful
implementation of a new, innovative business model is likely to have a direct and a
sizable impact on an organization’s overall financial performance. On the other hand,
investments targeted at improving digital platforms most likely will have little direct
impact on overall financial performance – but, improvements in digital platforms
often indirectly impact an overall financial performance via effected business platform
enhancements and/or business model innovations. An example of such an indirect
impact would be an investment to upgrade the servers supporting all of an
organization’s customer-facing websites. While these server upgrades would have
very little immediate financial performance impact, the upgrades should improve the
responsiveness of the customer-facing websites and, in doing so, improve customer
ease-of-use and satisfaction, both of which are likely to spur increased revenues.
Figure 11-5 Impact of Digitalization Investments on Overall Financial Performance
Digital Platform Operations &
Technology Services
Business Platform Efficiency
Overall Financial
Performance
Value Risk
D ig
it a
l I n
v e
s tm
e n
ts
Business Platform Effectiveness
Business Model Innovation
Note also that two aspects of overall financial performance are depicted in
Figure 11-5: value and risk. Value refers to the size of an anticipated financial gain
250
and risk refers to the likelihood that this anticipated financial gain will be realized.
The thickness of the horizontal arrows in Figure 11-5 reflects the potential impact of
digitalization investments on value and on risk. Digitalization investments targeted
at digital platforms generally have little direct impact on an organization’s financial
performance, but relatively little risk is involved. On the other hand, digital
investments targeted at improving business platform effectiveness generally have
sizable direct impacts on an organization’s financial performance, but considerable
risk is present. This risk might arise, for example, because the changes to a business
platform may have been ill-conceived or because the employees expected to engage
with the new business platform revert back to their old ways of doing things. In
either case, some promised benefits may never be realized.
The point just made in the prior paragraph underscores the reality that the
outcomes anticipated from digital investments often require that affected employees
and ecosystem participants must often change their behaviors if anticipated financial
gains are to be realized. Operational personnel are expected to carry out new work
practices, managers are expected to apply better decision processes and/or to act in
a timely fashion, customers are expected to react favorably to product improvements
and to engage with service improvements, and suppliers, intermediaries and strategic
partners are expected to take advantage of newly-exposed content or improved
interorganizational data flows. Such behavioral changes tend to be much more
difficult to put into place than are technology changes.
A Recap and Look Ahead
For better or worse, digitalization has become the dominant enabler of
organizations’ competitive actions – with organizations possessing greater
251
digitalization capabilities outpacing competitors possessing lesser digitalization
capabilities. All competitive actions (be they proactive or reactive in nature) start as
someone’s idea that is fleshed out and then bounced off others. Normally, the greater
the number and variety of contributors, the better the final product. And, the clearer
is a digitalization investment’s strategic focus, the more likely it is that others’
contributions will be on-target and value-adding.
Still, far too many executives, managers and professionals lack an adequate
appreciation of how digital investments are affecting, or might affect, their
organizations’ competitive success and, subsequently, their organizations’ financial
outcomes. This chapter has identified the four targets – digital platform operations
and technology services, business platform efficiency, business platform
effectiveness, and business model innovation – that most often serve as the strategic
focus of digitalization investments. By making clear both an investment’s strategic
focus and the importance of the investment to the organization’s bottom line,
proponents of an investment opportunity are more likely to attract the attention and
interest of others. The next chapter drills deeper into the relationship between a
proposed investment and financial performance outcomes by identifying six value
pathways by which digital investments most commonly affect performance outcomes.
GLOSSARY
Business model – a simplified and aggregated conceptualization of the value-
creating, profitability-sustaining activities of an organization.
Business platform effectiveness – improving the quality of the platform or the
quality of one or more of the business processes being hosted on the platform.
Business platform efficiency – improving the cycle times and costs associated with one or more of the business processes being hosted on a business platform.
Business process – a sequence of work tasks that converts inputs into outputs, and these work-task sequences can involve operational activities, managerial activities,
or both.
Business rules - the conditions that must be met when taking actions or making decisions.
Capability – the ability to achieve a desired outcome by bringing together and applying a particular set of resources.
Consumer welfare – the benefits received from consumers (rather than producers) from productivity increases in an economy.
Core capabilities – an element of a business model that describes the tangible and
intangible resources needed to successfully implement a business model’s value proposition and profit model.
Digital platform operations – activities involved in planning, designing, running, managing and evolving the technology services required to enable and support an
organization’s business platforms.
Digitalization – applying digitization within organizations and within the social and economic contexts within which organizations are embedded.
Digitalization capabilities – an organization’s readiness to attract, manage and retain individuals highly skilled in: identifying digitalization opportunities, building
and assessing business cases for digitalization investments, implementing funded digitalization investments, managing business platforms, and achieving the strategic aims sought through digitization.
Digitization – the purely technical processes associated with converting sensed and captured data into binary form, storing and transmitting these binary data,
manipulating these data, and storing/transmitting the outcomes of these data manipulations.
Digitization capabilities – an organization’s readiness to: apply digital technologies, digitized content and technology services; manage digital platforms;
and, attract, manage and retain highly-skilled technology professionals.
Dynamic capabilities – an element of a business model that describes the
intangible resources needed to (1) sense and assess opportunities for business model enhancement, replication and innovation, and (2) successfully implement these enhancements, replications and innovations.
First-order learning - engages participants in refining their understandings of a business process, but does not substantially change the assumptions and
foundational reasoning on which these understandings are based.
IT productivity paradox – the recognition (prior to the mid-1990s) that the ever- increasing investments in digital technologies produced mixed evidence regarding
productivity improvement across the US economy.
Network ecosystem – a market-focused ecosystem in which a network of value-
unit producers and a network of value-unit consumers are brought together by a network orchestrator.
Operating procedures – the sequenced tasks that comprise a business process as
well as the relationships among these tasks.
Performance-price ratio – the capabilities of a digital technology relative to the
technology’s cost.
Pipeline ecosystem – a market-focused ecosystem in which a producer
organization targets a collection of value-units at one or more consumer segments and fashions a linear value stream involving numerous upstream, midstream and downstream organizations to deliver the value-units to consumers.
Profit model – an element of a business model that defines how an organization expects to be profitable; consists of revenue models and cost models.
Risk – the likelihood that an anticipated financial gain will be realized.
Second-order learning – pre-existing ideas and assumptions are up-ended and looked at with a fresh and open mind.
Strategic focus – a conceptualization and articulation of a digitization/digitalization intention and the target(s) of this intention.
Technical services – the digitized functionalities and technical support provided to an organization’s employees and, increasingly, to its customers and suppliers.
Value – the size of an anticipated financial performance gain.
Value driver – a core factor underlying performance gains.
Value proposition – an element of a business model that defines how an organization will distinguish itself within the market(s) that it has chosen to
participate. Pipeline organizations distinguish themselves by creating value for consumers. Network organizations distinguish themselves by creating value for
participating communities.
- Chapter 11. Strategic Focus
- The IT Productivity Paradox
- Strategic Focus
- Impacting Overall Financial Performance
- A Recap and Look Ahead
- GLOSSARY