Week 15
Women, Conflict, and Culture in Former Yugoslavia
Author(s): Jovanka Stojsavljevic
Source: Gender and Development , Feb., 1995, Vol. 3, No. 1, [Culture] (Feb., 1995), pp. 36-
41
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of Oxfam GB
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4030423
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Taylor & Francis, Ltd. and are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Gender and Development
This content downloaded from 128.205.204.27 on Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:01:39 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
36
Women, conflict, and culture in former Yugoslavia Jovanka Stojsavljevic
Conflict signals a shock to the social order; violence against women escalates in the absence of cultural controls, and may be used as a weapon of war, and as a propaganda tool. This article examines these issues in the context offormer Yugoslavia, and discusses women's resistance to nationalist agendas.
T he countries of Slovenia, Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), Croatia, Bosnia, and Macedonia have had an
extremely turbulent history. As a result, the women's movement in the region has undergone many changes. In some circumstances, it has succumbed or adapted to the dominant culture and the political line taken by the government of the day. At other times, the movement has opposed the regime.
Since the break-up of former Yugoslavia, elements of these different reactions have taken place side by side. It has been tragic to witness women and women's groups, who were once united on the principles of global rights for women, becoming fragmented across the lines of the nationalist agendas of the warring parties. At the same time, it is incredible to see so many women continuing to resist the nationalist agenda, and to defy the state-controlled media propaganda. For three years, women's groups have organised to support survivors of war. They have raised funds to buy safe houses. They have worked relentlessly, without
salaries. Against all odds, women refuse to
hate their fellow people on the grounds of
their ethnic identity, even though they and
their families have now been suffering war
for three years.
The women's movement in former Yugoslavia
Tragically, one of the first events that took
place at the onset of the war was the
disintegration of the women's movement
across male-defined nationalist boundaries.
In 1987, the first National Feminist
Conference of Yugoslavia was held in
Ljubljana. One of the resolutions of this
conference was that women would not
recognise artificial male boundaries; that
they were united in sisterhood, and their common experiences as women over-rode male concerns for territorial rights and
geographical boundaries. It was also resolved that the male power struggles
should not be enacted across women's
bodies. These resolutions have been
challenged by the current civil war.
Gender and Development Vol 3, No. 1, February 1995
This content downloaded from 128.205.204.27 on Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:01:39 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Women, conflict, and culture in former Yugoslavia 37
The women's movement in Yugoslavia
was born during the Second World War,
with the formation of the Anti-Fascist Front
of Women. With the aim of ridding the
territory of fascism, women fought
alongside their male compatriots on the
front line, against the German Nazis, the
Chetniks of Serbia, who were mainly
royalists and supporters of the Orthodox
Church, and the Ustashi, fascists who were
backed by Hitler and formed a puppet
state. In effect, Yugoslavia suffered a civil
war while the world warred around it. As
is the case today, many unlikely alliances
between women were formed across the
territory, as factions who were normally
opposed joined in co-operation to attack
the 'other side'.
After the success of the 'partisans' in
suppressing the fascists, and the
establishment of the Socialist Federal
Republics of Yugoslavia, the Anti-Fascist
Front of Women was disbanded by the
Communist Party, on the basis that, under
communism, women would have equal
rights with men, and so there was no need
to organise separately. However, commun-
ism has never effectively addressed the fact
that societies throughout the world are
patriarchal, regardless of their political and
economic structures. This means that there
are a number of unwritten rules and
regulations, implicit to our cultures, that
explicitly disadvantage women.
In the 1970s, Yugoslavia witnessed the
setting-up of groups of women intellec-
tuals, who discussed and analysed the role
of women in society. These groups were
not involved in any kind of advocacy for
women's rights, nor were they involved in
supporting women whose rights had been
abused. In the early 1980s, a movement of
feminist activists emerged, influenced by
the women's peace movement in the West;
they organised fairly independently, often
in opposition to state institutions. These
feminist groups became actively involved
in advocacy and support work on issues
affecting women's lives, including rape
and domestic violence, pornography, and women's right to employment. The first SOS telephone-helpline for women and children experiencing rape and domestic violence was established in 1986, in Zagreb. Soon afterwards, a refuge for abused women was established.
The present situation
The women's movement in former Yugoslavia has been deeply affected by the nationalist agenda; it has lost the power to articulate any effective and united opposition to the war, and has so far been unable to prevent the widespread use of the violation of women as a propaganda tool to promote a nationalist agenda.
The language of the women's movement is now being used to further nationalist agendas: a leading member of the nationalist faction of the Croatian women's movement is quoted as making a comparison between Serb/male/aggres- sion against Croatia as a woman's body that is being assaulted. This statement caused a crisis which has led to Croatian feminists refusing to share platforms with Serbian feminists at international gather- ings of women opposed to the war, and attacks on feminists from Europe and America who invited women from Belgrade to such meetings.
In both Serbia and Croatia, those feminists who have refused to embrace the resurgence of nationalism and patriotism are accused of being enemies of the State by nationalist feminists, and by the mainstream media. Some have had to take refuge in other countries.
The feminist movement in Serbia has been further demoralised by the collective guilt feminists feel for the actions of the Serbian/Yugoslavian army and the Yugoslavian government. The war in former Yugoslavia first broke out in Slovenia, in June 1991, lasting for ten days.
This content downloaded from 128.205.204.27 on Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:01:39 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
38 Gender and Development
In Croatia, it broke out in August 1991. Even at this stage, people in Bosnia vociferously stressed that it could never break out there. While Yugoslavia disintegrated, political leaders in Bosnia - Karadzic, Izetbegovic and Kljuic - were talking of running a collective presidency representing a multicultural society! War finally came to Bosnia in May 1992.
The war in former Yugoslavia is rooted in an attempt by old guard communists to use the ideology of nationalism to shore up their personal power. The first overtly public signs of this nationalism came in a speech by Slobodan Milosevic, leader of the Serbs, in 1989, in which he called on all Serbs to commemorate the battle of Kosovo and remember that this was the heart of their kingdom, before Ottoman occupation; he asserted that Serbs should never allow themselves to be oppressed again. This speech preceded a violent oppression of the Kosovo miners' strike, and the introduction of what is now effectively military rule.
Women are seen as guardians of their culture; sexual insults may be used if they threaten political agendas which are set by men. During 1987, the year that Milosevic became leader of the Serb Communist Party, and liberals were removed from influential positions, Ali Sukrija, leader of the Communist Party of Kosovo, was quoted as saying 'Serbian women in Kosovo were only fit to be prostitutes in cafes'. Serbian women in Kosovo staged spontaneous demonstrations, calling for intervention from the Yugoslav army to protect them from abuse. Demonstrators carried placards saying: 'We gave up our sons for Yugoslavia, now the Yugoslavian army should protect us!'
In 1990 the constitution of Serbia was changed. Kosovo and Vojvodina were no longer independent provinces of Serbia, except on paper, and the heads of the local communist parties were changed to those who were pro-Milosevic. At the Fourteenth
Congress of Yugoslav Communists,
Slovenians, and Croats walked out as Milosevic sought to gain control of the Yugoslav Communist Party.
Soon after the outbreak of war, women's
groups were organised by the respective
governments, in order to ensure that
nationalist views were articulated to, and
by, women. Thus, while women demon-
strated against their sons being drafted into
the Yugoslavian army, the same groups
kept quiet when men were mobilised into the newly formed Serbian, Croatian or
Bosnian armies. Those women who did
oppose the conscription of their sons into
their own national armies were vilified and
accused of wanting the destruction of their
own people, by not wanting the country to defend itself.
Women's resistance to nationalism
Some excellent work has been carried out
by women's groups who refused the
nationalist agenda, and many new
initiatives have been developed, since the
onset of war. There are now literally hundreds of NGOs in former Yugoslavia;
many of them are women's groups, set up for many different reasons. However, an aim common to all of them is to provide support to women and children who have
suffered sexual violence, 'ethnic cleansing', the separation from, or death of, their loved ones, and the loss of their homes and
livelihoods. Women and children form
approximately 80 per cent of the displaced
population across the territory of former Yugoslavia.
Some women's groups have maintained
a strong political focus for their work,
despite ridicule and attack. The group known as Women in Black, based in
Belgrade, organises weekly demonstrations
against the war; members stand in the
city's central square, dressed in black, in silent protest against the war.
This content downloaded from 128.205.204.27 on Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:01:39 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Women, conflict, and culture in former Yugoslavia 39
1*.
Bosnian refugee in Croatia. In former Yugoslavia, violence against women is publicised for propaganda purposes; the newspaper headline reads 'Through terror to greater Serbia'
Women, war, and sexual violence
Throughout history, sexual attacks on women have formed a common strategy of
male warfare. The aim of this strategy is to humiliate enemy men, and destroy the
fabric of the family and society; a raped woman is no longer viewed as 'clean', and often no longer has a place in her family or community. This view is clearly expressed in an article in one national newspaper in
Serbia, describing a woman's experience of rape by the enemy. The article ended, 'She would be better off dead than alive to shame her husband, her family and her community by giving birth to a child from the seed of the enemy.'
Raping and impregnating women also
serves as a strategy of 'ethnic cleansing': if a man from one nationality makes a woman from the enemy nationality
pregnant, then the child will automatically
take on the nationality of the rapist. In the
old patriarchal tradition, it is the father's
nationality that is important, and defines
the nationality of the child.
In a collective centre in Croatia, where
refugees and displaced people are housed,
a refugee woman was forced to flee again
after other refugees found out that she had
been raped, and would not get an abortion.
Ironically, this is in a country where the
Catholic church has a very strong in-
fluence, and where the government had
attempted, unsuccessfully, to introduce
legislation against abortion.
Despite the widespread incidence of
rape in conflict throughout history, this has
tended not to be recorded, except where it
can be used for propaganda purposes. The
war in former Yugoslavia has highlighted
rape as a strategy of war, and this has as a
result placed rape, occurring in the context
of conflict, on the international agenda.
However, at the height of the war in
This content downloaded from 128.205.204.27 on Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:01:39 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
40 Gender and Development
Somalia, women in that country were also
being used and abused in their own civil
war, but this received no public attention. The international community has work
to do if rape is to be recognised fully as a
human rights issue. Rape of women is not
even mentioned in the Geneva Conven-
tions; and women seeking asylum in
Britain, on the basis of gender-based
persecution, are often rejected on the
grounds that being raped is a side-
consequence of war, arbitrarily meted out,
and so does not amount to 'persecution on
the grounds of political beliefs'.
The reason. wvhy the issue of rape inow
hias a puiblic pra file iniformer
YtNposlavia is ohiiy becauise of its use as a u(ea pan- of propaga-inda.
It could be argued that the reason why
the issue of rape now has a public profile in
former Yugoslavia is only because of its
use as a weapon of propaganda; it suits a
number of political agendas, which concem
both the national and international
communities: namely, geographical bound-
aries, territorial rights, and sovereign states.
It seems that it is not the right of women to
protection from sexual violation that is
important, but the wider political battles that can be fought through their experience
of violation.
The use of rape in conflict to further
these agendas results in further violations
of a woman's dignity and integrity. She
merely becomes the victim or object of her
own experience; her rape is seen as
important only because it is committed by
a man or men from an alien ethnic group, and not because rape is a crime of violence
against her.
Publicity about rape in former Yugo-
slavia has resulted in further insensitivities, or even outright abuse, being aimed at
women who have experienced rape. NGOs
and journalists have flooded into the
territory, saying '1 want to interview a raped
woman', or '1 want to counsel women who have been raped.' Books have been written
with gratuitous details of women's
experiences of rape. I would ask why this is;
surely it is not to improve care and support
for the victims of rape, nor to advocate
women's rights during war, but rather to
prove that one race of men is the aggressor
against another race of men. Invariably,
sensational media coverage of the rape of
women in former Yugoslavia has resulted in
women rape victims becoming unable to
voice their trauma; this additional torment
for women who have already undergone
extreme suffering has attracted condem-
nation from indigenous women's groups
across the territory.
Women's survival strategies
The suffering caused to women by the war
is not limited to rape, 'ethnic cleansing',
loss of homes, livelihoods, family and friends. War causes the destruction of
economies and the social welfare system.
As a result, women are forced to become
single heads of their families and take
responsibility for provision of food,
clothes, and other necessities, as well as
caring for vulnerable members: children,
the elderly, and the disabled.
One of Oxfam's strategic aims in former
Yugoslavia is 'to empower women to
challenge the causes and alleviate the
effects of gender-based suffering caused by
patriarchal structuring of society and
exacerbated by armed conflict'. Funda- mental to this aim is that women's voices
are heard; that women articulate their own
experiences and needs, and formulate their
own strategies for survival. Oxfam is
currently working on an initiative to record
women's testimonies of war. It is a contri-
bution towards ensuring that women's
voices are heard from their own perspec-
This content downloaded from 128.205.204.27 on Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:01:39 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Women, conflict, and culture in former Yugoslavia 41
4~~~~~~t
,~~~~~~~~4 An income-generating project can provide an opportunity for women who have experienced violence to support each other.
tive as subjects of their experience and as a force for change.
A number of other initiatives have been
developed over the past two years to
support women to reconstruct the fabric of
their society. In Tuzla, we have a psycho- social programme, in the form of
occupational workshops where women can
meet and talk, away from the refugee
centres. Here, women can utilise their skills
and earn a small income, by sewing and
knitting warm clothing for other refugees
in central Bosnia. Oxfam is supporting a
similar initiative in Belgrade.
In Croatia, Oxfam has helped to
strengthen and build the capacity of a local women's group, that facilitates self-help and mutual support groups for displaced
women and refugees. We are also preparing a programme that will enable
displaced women who cannot return home,
to achieve sustainable livelihoods through training in micro-enterprise.
Another strategy for achieving our aim
is to facilitate communication and
networking between women's groups
across the territory of Former Yugoslavia.
Apart from planning a regional conference
on violence against women and enabling
local partners to participate in the UN
conference on Women in Beijing, Oxfam
has funded Electronic Witches to link up
Oxfam offices and various women's groups
to E-mail. This will ensure that groups who
are currently isolated, will be able to make
contact, share information, experience and
knowledge with other groups working on
similar issues, both across the territory and internationally.
Jovanka Stojsavljevic is Oxfam's Regional Representativeforformer Yugoslavia.
This content downloaded from 128.205.204.27 on Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:01:39 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms