Summative paper

High Distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Fail

Content

45-50

40-44

31-39

25-30

0-24

Introduction and analysis of key theories of governance

You demonstrate clear critical thinking of the case and correctly analyse theories with sources.

You demonstrate a competent level of critical thinking of the case and analyse theories with sources.

You demonstrate some measure of critical thinking of the case and analyse theories with sources

You demonstrate limited critical thinking of the case and analyse theories, lacking sources.

You demonstrate a lack of critical thinking of the case, theories were not analysed, missing sources.

Application of stewardship to governance

19-20

16-18

13-15

10-12

0-9

Application of stewardship theory to effective governance

Thoughtful, well explored and well substantiated

Mostly well thought out and substantiated

Some mention but not thoroughly substantiated in all places

Limited exploration but not substantiated in all places

Few if any, not supported

Ethical/ Biblical

principles

9-10

8

7

5-6

0-3

Recognition and application of appropriate of ethical/ biblical principles

Well integrated and relevant to the issues identified

Strong attempt at integration and relevance

Acceptable applicability/ relevance.

Limited integration/ relevance

No integration/ lacking relevance

Leadership and governance

9-10

8

7

5-6

0-3

Effect of leadership values and beliefs to governance

In depth, clear, well reasoned and very insightful, well supported.

Well reasoned, mostly clear and insightful, well supported.

Acceptable level of reasoning, somewhat clear and somewhat insightful, mostly supported.

Somewhat lacking in substance, not very clear and a few insights, somewhat supported.

Unsubstantiated, lack clarity and insight, not supported.

Structure & mechanics

9-10

8

7

5-6

0-3

· Coherence and organisation

· APA format

An exceptionally clear, concise and coherent essay, critically organised and including all required sections.

Academic conventions are rigorously adhered to throughout the essay, with no errors present.

A clear and coherent essay organised and including all required sections.

Academic conventions are rigorously adhered to throughout the essay, with very few errors present.

A somewhat coherent and organized essay and including most required sections.

Academic conventions are adhered to throughout the essay, with some errors present.

A somewhat focussed, slightly incoherent essay, characterised by some disorganisation and/or missing required sections.

Academic conventions are followed inconsistently, a number of errors present.

An unfocussed, incoherent essay, characterised by disorganisation and/or missing required sections.

Academic conventions are followed inconsistently, a notable number of errors present.

Total

/100