Business Finance - Operations Management OPMT 620: Operations Management - Case Study McDonalds Assignment

profileSkaur12
Stevenson7ce_PPT_Ch101.pptx

Statistical Quality Control

Chapter

Sam Lampropoulos George Brown College

10

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Trek Bicycle

2

Trek Bicycle has a well earned reputation for building some of the most technologically advanced bikes in the world. The company has gotten to where it is by relentless innovation and continuous improvement of its production processes

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

3

List and explain various elements of the statistical process control planning process.

Explain how control charts are designed and the concepts that underlie their use, and solve typical problems.

Assess and solve problems involving process capability.

Describe Six Sigma quality and design of experiments.

Learning Objectives

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Introduction to Statistical Process Control

Control Charts

Process Capability

Six Sigma Quality and Design of Experiments

4

Chapter Outline

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Introduction

Statistical Quality Control uses statistical techniques and sampling to monitor and test the quality of goods and services.

Acceptance sampling relies on inspection, determines to accept or reject a product

Statistical process control determines if process is operating within acceptable limits during production

Inspection is the appraisal of goods/services against standards.

5

The best companies design quality into the process, thereby reducing the need for inspection/tests.

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

p385

5

Phases of Quality Control

6

Phases of statistical quality control/ improvement in a company.

Figure 10-1

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-1 Page #345

6

Statistical Process Control Planning Process

7

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

1. Define important quality characteristics, and how to measure

2. For each characteristic,

a. Determine a quality control point

b. Plan

c. Plan the corrective action process.

i. How to inspect

ii. How much to inspect

iii. Where centralized or on-site

Inspection

How Much/How Often

Where/When

Centralized vs. On-site

8

Location of use of an acceptance sampling and statistical process control within production

Figure 10-2

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-2 Page #345

In manufacturing, some of the typical quality control points are:

 1. At the beginning of process. There is little sense in paying for goods that do not meet quality standards and in spending time and effort on material that is bad to begin with.

2. At the end of process. Customer satisfaction and company’s image are at stake here, and repairing or replacing products in the field is usually much more costly than doing it at the factory.

3. At the operation where a characteristic of interest to customers is first determined. In particular, before a costly, irreversible, or covering (e.g., painting) operation.

The HACCP system described in the previous chapter also provides some guidelines for determining the quality control points.

In the service sector, inspection points include where personnel and customer interfaces (e.g., service counter) and the facility.

8

Where to Inspect in the Process: Quality Control Point

9

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

9

1. At the beginning of the process:

Raw materials and purchased parts

3. At the operation where a characteristic of interest to customers is first determined:

Before a costly operation

Before an irreversible process Before a covering process

2. At the end of the process:

Finished products

Examples of Inspection Points

10

Similar to Table 10-1

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Similar to Table 10-1 Page # 347

10

Inspection Costs

11

The amount of inspection is optimal when the sum of the costs of inspection and passing defectives is minimized.

Figure 10-3

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-3 Page # 348

“As illustrated in Figure 10–3, if inspection activities increase, inspection costs increase, but the costs of undetected defects decrease. The goal is to minimize the sum of these two costs. In other words, it may not pay to attempt to catch every defect, particularly if the cost of inspection exceeds the penalties associated with letting some defects get through.”

11

Centralized vs. On-Site Inspection

Immovable product (e.g. ship)

Simple or handheld measuring equipment

Automated inspection

12

On-Site

specialized equipment,

Skilled quality control inspectors,

More favourable test environment

Are the advantages of specialized lab tests worth the time and interruption?

In Lab

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

P388-9

12

(SPC) Statistical Process Control

Statistical Process Control: Statistical evaluation of the product during production

13

Types of Variations

Sampling and Sampling Distributions

Control Charts & Their Design

Sample Mean and Range Control Charts

Individual Unit, Moving Range Control Charts

Control Charts for Attributes.

Run Tests and Using Control Charts

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

13

Statistical Process Control (SPC) Steps

14

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

14

Take periodic samples from process

If outside limits, stop process and take corrective action

Compare to predetermined limits

If inside limits, continue process

Types of Variations

15

Main task of SPC is to distinguish assignable from random variation

Random variation: Natural variations in the output of process, created by countless minor factors.

Assignable variation: A variation whose source can be identified.

Figure 10-4

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-4 Page #351

The variability of a sample statistic is described by its sampling distribution, which is the theoretical distribution of the values of the statistic for all possible samples of a given size from the process.

The sampling distribution of sample mean exhibits less variability than the process distribution because of the averaging that occurs in computing the sample means. The mean of the sampling distribution is exactly equal to the mean of the process. Most process distributions and sampling distributions are approximately Normal. Furthermore, the central limit theorem implies that sampling distributions will be approximately Normal, even if the population (i.e., the process) is not.

If the process has only random variability, then the sample mean should most likely fall between 2 (with 95.5 percent probability for Normal distribution) or 3 (with 99.7 percent probability for Normal distribution) standard deviations of the process mean (see Figure 10–5). If it doesn’t, then we can conclude that the process mean most likely has changed, and hence there is most likely an assignable cause.

15

Normal Distribution

Only a small percentage of sample means fall more than 2 or 3 standard deviations from the process mean.

16

Figure 10-6

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-6 Page # 352

16

Control Chart

Purpose: to monitor process output to distinguish between random and assignable variation

A time ordered plot of sample statistics (e.g. means) obtained from an ongoing process

Upper and lower control limits define the range of acceptable variation

17

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

17

Control Chart

18

Figure 10-7

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-7 Page #353

18

Control Limits

19

Sampling distribution

Process distribution

Process Mean

Control limits are set at 2 or 3 standard deviations of the process mean.

Lower control limit

Upper control limit

The dividing lines between random and assignable deviations from the process mean.

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-8 p392

Control limits are calculated for 2 (with 95.5 percent probability for Normal distribution) or 3 (with 99.7 percent probability for Normal distribution) standard deviations of the process mean.

19

Type I and Type II Error

20

Type II error: concluding a process is in control when it is actually not (assignable variation is present).

Type I error: concluding that a process has changed (assignable variation) when it has not.

Figure 10-9

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-9 Page #354

20

Type I and Type II Errors

In control Out of control
In control No Error Type I error (producers risk)
Out of control Type II Error (consumers risk) No error

21

Table 10-2

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Table 10-2 Page #354

21

Observations from Sample Distribution

22

Each sample mean (a red dot) is compared to the control limits.

Figure 10-10

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-10 Page # 355

each sample mean is compared to the extremes of the sampling distribution (i.e., the control limits) to judge if it is within the acceptable (random) range.

22

Designing Control Charts

23

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

If the process is out of control it is due to assignable variation. Assignable variation can be identified and removed from the process.

23

1. Determine a sample size

2. Obtain 20 to 25 samples

3. Establish and graph preliminary control limits

4. Plot sample statistic values on control chart

5. Are any points outside control limits (CL)?

a. NO Assume no assignable cause

Process is in control

b. YES Investigate and correct

Process is out of control

Control Charts for Variables

Sample Mean control charts

Used to monitor the mean (centre) of a process.

X-bar charts

Sample Range control charts

Used to monitor the process dispersion (variation)

R charts

24

Variables generate data that are measured.

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Upper and Lower Control Limits for Sample Mean Chart

where

x = Standard deviation of sampling distribution of sample means =

 = Process standard deviation

n = Sample size

z = Standard Normal deviate (usually z = 3)

= Average of sample means = grand mean

25

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Formula 10-1 Page #355

25

Upper and Lower Control Limits for Sample Mean Chart

where

A2 can be obtained from Table 10–3

= Average of sample ranges

Sample range = maximum value – minimum value in the sample

= Average of sample means = grand mean

26

Alternate Method

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Example: Control Chart

Twenty samples of n = 8 have been taken of the weight of a part. The average of sample ranges for the 20 samples is .016kg, and the average of sample means is 3kg. Determine three sigma control limits for sample mean of this process.

27

Solution

Example 10-3

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Example 10-3 Page # 357

27

Upper and Lower Control Limits for Sample Range Control Chart

28

Sample range (R) control chart: the control chart for sample range, used to monitor process dispersion or spread.

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Example: Control Chart

Twenty-five samples of n=10 observations have been taken from a milling process. The average of sample ranges is .01 centimetre. Determine upper and lower control limits for sample range.

29

Solution

UCLR = 1. 78(.01) = 0.0178cm

LCLR = 0.22(.01) = 0.0022cm

Example 10-4

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Example 10-4 Page # 358

29

Example: Sample Mean and Range Charts

30

Data from 15 samples each with 5 observations.

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

23

Chart helps explain how sample mean and range are determined. Not in text.

Calculate sample means, sample ranges, grand mean, and average of sample ranges.

Example: Sample Mean and Range Charts

31

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

24

Chart helps explain how sample mean and range are determined. Not in text. Sample mean =10.73, sample range = 0.22

From Table 10-3

Choose factor for sample size

Determine Control Limits

Example: Sample Mean and Range Charts

32

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

25

Create x-bar Chart and Plot Values

Example: Sample Mean and Range Charts

33

UCL

LCL

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

26

The sample means, as plotted on the x-bar chart, shows a process in control. Random variation.

UCL

LCL

Create R-chart and Plot Values

Example: Sample Mean and Range Charts

34

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

27

The range chart sample plots show sample #8 above the upper control limit. The process is out of control based on amount of variation. This is due to assignable cause.

Sample Mean and Range Charts

35

Figure 10-11A.

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-11A. Page # 359

x-bar and R-charts used together.

E.g. Thanksgiving turkey in the oven. What can go wrong with the temp. of oven if set at 350 F? The avg. temp during cooking could be 250 F instead. Or, could avg 350 F, but actually fluctuate during cooking time between 200 & 500. Either way, turkey won’t be properly cooked. x-bar would detect inaccurate avg. temp. R-chart detect changes in temp.

Use R-chart first. If out of control, then process variation is out of control. Next investigate cause. No need to interpret x-bar chart if R-chart out of control. If R-chart in control, then interpret x-bar chart. If out of control, then process average is out of control.

35

Sample Mean and Range Charts

36

Figure 10-11B

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-11B Page # 359

36

Individual Unit Control Charts

where

 = Process standard deviation

z = Standard Normal deviate (usually z = 3)

= Average of individual observations (estimate of process mean)

37

Individual unit (X) control chart

Used to monitor single observations ( n = 1)

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Moving Range Control Charts

where

= Average of moving ranges (absolute value of the difference between two consecutive observations)

38

Moving range (MR) control chart

MR is difference between consecutive observations

used to monitor dispersion or spread when n = 1

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Example 10-5 Page # 359

38

Control Charts for Attributes

p-Chart - Control chart used to monitor the proportion of defectives in a process.

c-Chart - Control chart used to monitor the number of defects per unit.

39

Control charts for attributes are used when the process characteristic is counted rather than measured.

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Control Charts for Attributes

p-Chart – for sample proportion of defectives in a process

c-Chart – for the number of defects per unit

40

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Note: Because formula for control limits is an approximation, sometimes LCLp will be negative. In this case, zero should be used as the lower control limit.

If the value of c is unknown, as is generally the case, the sample estimate, , is used in place of , where = number of defects  number of samples.

When the lower control limit is negative, it is set to zero.

40

Use of p-Charts

When observations can be placed into two categories.

Good or bad

Pass or fail

Operate or don’t operate

When the data consists of multiple samples of several observations each.

Sample proportion of defectives.

41

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Use of c-Charts

Use only when number of occurrences per unit of measure can be counted; non-occurrences cannot be counted.

Scratches, chips, dents, or errors per item

Cracks or faults per unit of distance

Breaks or tears per unit of area

Bacteria or pollutants per unit of volume

Calls, complaints, failures per unit of time

42

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

At what points in the process to use control charts?

What size samples to take?

What type of control chart to use (i.e., variables or attribute)?

How often samples should be taken?

Managerial Considerations Concerning Control Charts

43

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

43

Nonrandom Patterns in Control Charts: Run Tests

44

Fig 10-12

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Fig 10-12 Page #364

44

Ideally both control charts and run tests should be used to analyze process output, along with a plot of the data.

The procedure involves the following steps:

Compute control limits for the process output

Conduct median and up/down run tests

Note: If there is no indication that the process output is nonrandom. Plot the sample data and check for patterns (e.g., cycling). If you see a pattern, the output is probably not random. Otherwise, conclude the output is random and that the process is in control

Using Control Charts and Run Tests Together

45

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

ideally both control charts and run tests should be used to analyze process output, along with a plot of the data. The procedure involves the following three steps:

45

Process Capability

Design specifications

Range of acceptable values established by engineering design or customer requirements

Process variability

Natural variability in a process

Process capability

Ability of a process to meet the design specification

46

Three terms relate to the process capability:

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Process Capability Indices

47

Process capability ratio=

specification width

process width

If the process is centered use Cp

If the process is not centered use Cpk

Upper specification – Process mean

3

Smaller of:

Process mean – Lower specification

3

and

Upper specification – lower specification

6

Cp =

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Process centered means the process mean is in the centre of the limits. Sometimes the limits are smaller, or even zero, on one side of the process mean.

47

Capability Example

Machine Standard Deviation  Machine Variability 6 Machine Capability Cp = spec/6
A 0.13 0.78 0.80/0.78 = 1.03
B 0.08 0.48 0.80/0.48 = 1.67
C 0.16 0.96 0.80/0.96 = 0.83

48

48

Cp > 1.33 is desirable

Cp = 1.00 process is barely capable

Cp < 1.00 process is not capable

The design specification for the width of a part is between 101 mm and 101.8 mm (= .8 mm). Which of these machines are capable?

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Similar to Example 10-9, different values

48

Process Capability Analysis

49

Figure 10-16

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Similar to Figure 10-16 Page #368

Note: For this looking at PROCESS distribution, individual items, not samples

If less than 1 then not capable

For six sigma, must be 2.

If not capable might:

1) redesign process

2) use alternate process

3) use more inspection

4) see if can relax specs

If > 1 then better than needed. Is it costing more for that, or can we charge more for better quality?

Capability Analysis

If incapable:

Redesign process or reduce variability

Use alternative process

Use 100-percent inspection

Examine/relax design specification

50

Capable = process output falls within specifications.

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Process Capability Example: Cookie Packages

A company creates small packages of cookies in a 16 gram package. Government standards state that weights must be within ± 5 percent of the weight advertised on the package.

The design specifications are:

Upper design specification = 16 + .05(16) = 16.8 grams

Lower design specification = 16 – .05(16) = 15.2 grams

Inspectors test 1,000 packages of cookies and find an average weight of 15.875 grams with a standard deviation of .529 grams.

51

Is the process capable?

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

New example

51

Process Capability Example: Cookie Packages

52

Specification Limits

Upper Spec = 16.8 g

Lower Spec = 15.2 g

Observed Weight

Mean = 15.875 g

Std Dev = .529 g

What is the Cp index for

this process?

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Not capable.

Use Cpk b/c the process is not centered on 16 (spec = 16, but mean = 15.88). The Cp = 0.504 also excessive variation in the process.

What does a Cpk of .4253 mean?

An index that shows how well the units being produced fit within the specification limits.

Process considered capable if Cpk  1.

This process will produce a relatively high number of defects.

Many companies look for a Cpk of 1.3 or better… Six-Sigma companies want 2.0!

53

Bigger is Better!

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Six Sigma Quality

Goal: achieving process variability so small that the half-width of design specification equals six standard deviations of the process.

Cpk = 2.00 = only 3.4 units per million outside design specification

54

Figure 10-17

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Figure 10-17 Page # 370

54

Design of Experiments

Taguchi suggested a more concise set of experiments by changing levels of factors to measure their influence on output and identifying best levels for each factor.

Identify controllable factors that could influence variation

Set each factor to 2 or more levels

Measure the variation in the process

55

Experiment
Factor (I) (II) (III) (IV)
a 1 1 2 2
b 1 2 1 2
c 1 2 2 1

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

Page #372

design of experiments Performing experiments by changing levels of factors to measure their influence on output and identifying best levels for each factor.

55

A methodology that is used to show how well parts being produced fit into a range specified by design limits is ….?

Capability analysis

Six Sigma

Range Chart

Mean Chart

None of the above

Concept Check

56

Answer: a. Capability analysis

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

7

You want to prepare a p-chart and you observe 200 samples with 10 in each, and find 5 defective units. What is the resulting “proportion defective”?

25

2.5

0.0025

0.00025

Can not be computed on data above

Concept Check

57

Answer: c. 0.0025 (5/(200x10)=0.0025)

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

7

You want to prepare an x-bar chart. If the number of observations in a “subgroup” is 10, what is the appropriate “factor” used in the computation of the UCL and LCL?

1.88

0.31

0.22

1.78

None of the above

Concept Check

58

Answer: b. 0.31 (from Table 10-3)

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

7

You want to prepare an R chart. If the number of observations in a sample is 5, what is the appropriate “factor” used in the computation of the LCL?

0

0.88

1.88

2.11

None of the above

Concept Check

59

Answer: a. 0 (from Table 10-3)

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

7

Statistical process control and control charts focus on detecting departures from stability in a process.

Variation types are random and assignable.

Sample mean control charts are used to monitor the process mean.

Sample range control charts are used to monitor process dispersion or spread.

Individual unit X control charts are used for single observations (n = 1).

Moving range control charts monitor the dispersion or spread of the differences between consecutive observations.

p-charts are used to monitor the proportion of defective items.

c-charts are used to monitor the number of defects per unit product.

If a sample statistic falls outside control limits or its series has a pattern, then the process is out of control.

Run test is used to determine if a nonrandom pattern exists.

Summary

60

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

7

Briefly explain the statistical process control (SPC) process.

Explain how control charts are designed and the concepts that underlie their use.

Select and create an appropriate SPC charts.

Explain the use of capability analysis.

Analyze the capability of a process.

Describe Six Sigma quality.

Explain how design of experiments can be used to improve processes.

61

Learning Checklist

© 2021 McGraw-Hill Education Limited.

image1.jpeg

image16.png

image17.gif

image18.png

image19.png

image20.wmf

oleObject1.bin

Type of

business

Inspection

points

Characteristics

Fast Food

Cashier

Counter area

Eating area

Building

Kitchen

Accuracy

Appearance, productivity

Cleanliness

Appearance

Health regulations

Hotel/motel

Parking lot

Accounting

Building

Main desk

Safe, well lighted

Accuracy, timeliness

Appearance, safety

Waiting times

Supermarket

Cashiers

Deliveries

Accuracy, courtesy

Quality, quantity

image21.png

image22.png

image23.png

image24.png

image25.png

image26.wmf

image27.wmf

image28.png

image29.png

image30.wmf

image31.wmf

image32.wmf

oleObject4.bin

oleObject5.bin

oleObject6.bin

image33.wmf

image34.wmf

oleObject7.bin

oleObject8.bin

oleObject9.bin

image35.wmf

oleObject10.bin

image290.png

image30.png

image36.wmf

oleObject11.bin

image37.wmf

oleObject12.bin

image38.wmf

image39.wmf

image40.wmf

image41.wmf

oleObject13.bin

oleObject14.bin

image42.wmf

image43.wmf

image44.wmf

oleObject15.bin

image45.wmf

image46.wmf

oleObject16.bin

image47.png

image48.png

image42.png

image43.png

image40.png

image45.png

image49.wmf

image50.wmf

image51.wmf

oleObject17.bin

oleObject18.bin

oleObject19.bin

image52.wmf

image53.wmf

image54.png

image55.png

image56.wmf

image57.wmf

image58.wmf

oleObject20.bin

oleObject21.bin

oleObject22.bin

image59.png

image60.wmf

oleObject23.bin

oleObject24.bin

oleObject25.bin