marketing homework help

VIKALPA • VOLUME 41 • ISSUE 2 • APRIL-JUNE 2016 149

Consumer Response to Brand Placement in Movies: Investigating the Brand-Event Fit

Komal Nagar

R E S E A R C H

KEY WORDS

Brand Placement

Brand–Event Fit

Movies

Attitude towards the Brand

includes research articles that focus on the analysis and resolution of managerial and

academic issues based on analytical and empirical or

case research

Movies offer the perfect media site for placement of brands as part of the emerging marketing strategy. Although attempts to analyse brand placements have been made in the past, the same needs more attention in the Indian context. Given the exposure of Indian audiences to both national and international entertainment industry, it is only reasonable to expect the entertainment event context to have an impact on consumers’ evaluation of the brands placed in each context.

The present research attempts to extend the applicability of the idea of fit, which was till now largely confined to sponsorship and subjects it to the exploration of finding a fit between brands and specific events, in particular, movies. Because the link between country of origin of the entertainment event (national/international) and brand, place- ment is a relevant area of speculation, the present research aims to study this relation- ship within the national/international context. Results of an experimental study among 120 respondents are as follows:

• Brands placed in a national event will create more positive brand evaluations in terms of positive attitude towards the placed brand and intention to purchase than brands that are placed in an international event.

• When the presence of a brand is consistent with the context in which it is placed, it would evoke more positive attitudes and behaviour than an incongruent placement.

• Evaluation of results further reveals that although a brand that fits well with the context in which it is placed generates a positive evaluation of the placed brand, the condition of a brand-event misfit in a Hollywood context will create more negative evaluations among the Indian audiences than if such a disconnect appeared in a Hindi film. In other words, a brand may have more to lose in case of a misfit with the international entertainment event than with a national entertainment event.

Based on the findings of the present study, it is suggested that multinational brands must look at the Indian movies as a suitable medium for reaching out to the prospective buyers as Indians have become consumers of global brands and thus pose to be a huge market for global brands.

VIKALPA The Journal for Decision Makers

41(2) 149–167 © 2016 Indian Institute of

Management, Ahmedabad SAGE Publications

sagepub.in/home.nav DOI: 10.1177/0256090916642678

http://vik.sagepub.com

Executive Summary

150 CONSUMER RESPONSE TO BRAND PLACEMENT IN MOVIES: INVESTIGATING THE BRAND-EVENT FIT

As the line between entertainment and marketing communication gets increasingly blended or even erased (de Gregorio & Sung, 2010; Eagle, 2007; Steel, 2007; Winkler & Buckner, 2006), the notion of brand placement in an entertainment context receives considerable attention from scholars and practitioners alike. Although there are many definitions of the term, brand or product placement have often been used inter- changeably and generally refer to the use of a prod- uct’s name, packaging, signage, or other trademarks in media (Steortz, 1987).

Screening thousands of films every year, the film industry is fast emerging as the medium with the maximum potential to capture and convert audiences to potential consumers. Tag Heuer in Don (2006), Coke in Dhoom 2 (2006), Singapore Tourism Board in Krrish (2006), or Pepsi in Pearl Harbour (2001), product placements have a very significant role in Indian1 and international2 movies. Such placements have also started to appear in television series (Fitzgerald, 2002), live shows (Matthews, 2005), video- games (Gunn, 2001; Nelson, Keum, & Yaros, 2004), and even books (Kretchmer, 2004; Moser, Bryant, & Sylvester, 2004; Turner, 2004). The reason behind using product placement in these media, however, remains the same: generating additional income for the producer while creating an opportunity for the advertisers to present their offering in an entertainment context (Russell & Belch, 2005). By doing so, not only does the offering reach a larger audience, but it also gets a much longer life than a 30-second commercial.

While product placement is riskier than conventional advertising, it is becoming a common practice to place products and brands into mainstream media, including films, which are an extremely popular medium among advertisers. Also, with the traditional media getting overcrowded and nearly saturated, the concept of product placement has become even more popular as a communication technique, which is now being used more than ever by advertisers (Karrh, Mckee, & Pardum, 2003). A lot of research has focused on product placement in all its forms (Gupta & Gould, 2007; Nelson, 2002), but more specifically on product placement in movies (Karrh, 1998). Brand placement in movies seems to be well accepted (O’Reilly, Cripps, Kazani, Patel, & Zarra, 2005) and is sometimes consid- ered less expensive and more effective than a 30-second TV spot (Jaffe, 2005), resulting in a more frequent use of this communication technique.

However, in the era of expanding global competition, where companies are trying hard to reach out to their customers effectively and efficiently to market their product and services to different national cultures, an important yet lurking question that remains unan- swered is: To what extent have marketers been able to successfully reach their customers? Although product placement utilizes the global reach of movies, minimal research has been conducted to study the effects of product placement across cultures. Therefore, of particular interest in this study is the influence of brand placements in an entertainment event, especially movies that represent two different cultures. How do viewers perceive brands placed in movies? Do brands placed in Indian movies have a different impact on viewers than brands placed in international movies? Should the advertisers and marketers, therefore, view the placement of their brands in national and interna- tional entertainment contexts differently? To answer these questions, the study focuses on the opinions of people who are viewers of both Indian and interna- tional movies.

A review of brand placement studies indicates a major gap in the literature. Previous studies of brand place- ment were largely conducted in the US with little focus on it as a global phenomenon (DeLorme, 1998; Grein & Grould, 1996) given the fact that many movies play to and are often produced for multinational audiences, raising the issue of how consumers in other countries perceive product placements. Also, while product placement has been researched extensively (Karrh, 1998; McKechnie & Zhou, 2003; Russell & Belch, 2005) in studies that have focused on one or more of the placement’s characteristics, in particular, its prom- inence (Gupta & Lord, 1998; Russell, 1998, 2002) and plot connection (d’Astous & Chartier, 2000; Fontaine, 2002; Russell, 2002), it is not clear from the previous studies if a brand placed in a matching context would have any effect on consumer’s evaluation behaviour. And till date no study, either at the national or the inter- national level, has examined the effects of brand place- ment’s fit/misfit within movies. Being the first of its kind, the present study finds its need and relevance by investigating congruence between entertainment event and brand.

Furthermore, given the exposure of Indian audiences to both national and international entertainment industry, it is only reasonable to expect the country of origin of the entertainment event to have an impact

VIKALPA • VOLUME 41 • ISSUE 2 • APRIL-JUNE 2016 151

on consumer’s evaluation. Because the link between the country of origin of the entertainment event and brand placement is a relevant area of speculation, the present research aims to study this relationship including national/international context. And even though measures of product placement evaluation have been problematic, product placement is a fast growing multi-billion dollar industry (McDonnell & Drennan, 2010) making the present study relevant for both, advertisers and marketers. A great deal of research has already been devoted to product place- ment in movies; however, this article strives to present, for the first time, the effect of fit between brand and the entertainment event on consumer’s brand evaluation.

BRAND PLACEMENT IN MOVIES

There are enough reasons that suggest the growth of product placement. The erosion of traditional media audience and its fragmentation on the one hand (Deloitte, 2005) and the use of alternate media such as the internet, allowing consumers to skip ads (O’Neill & Barrett, 2004) on the other hand, has forced the adver- tisers to seek a more reliable media to re-establish the link between their offering and their consumers. In such a scenario, product placement has surfaced as an important tool for the advertisers and marketers, posing as competition to the traditional commercial medium of advertising.

In movies, the role of brand placement has increased in recent times. Initially, brands were typically featured in movies in three ways: the product itself was shown, a logo of the brand was displayed, or a brand was displayed as a background prop (Smith, 1985). The role has changed ever since, from the brand being a mere prop in the background to being a central part of the movie, thereby increasing its prominence. The promi- nence of brand placement is defined as ‘the capacity of the brand to attract the spectator’s attention’ (Fontaine, 2001). Among other factors, such as the size and dura- tion of the brand’s placement on screen (Fontaine, 2002), this capacity can be linked to the brand’s location in the scene (Gupta & Lord, 1998) and the number of times the brand appears on the screen (Bressoud, Lehu, & Russell, 2008).

No matter how the brand is placed in the movie, by using brand placement, marketers hope to gain an advantage in comparison with the traditional commer- cial advertising format. The availability of a captive

audience with greater reach than traditional advertise- ments and the advantage of showing brands in their natural environment (Stephan & Coote, 2005) provide motivation for product placements (Deigh, 1985; Hulin-Salkin, 1989; Turcotte, 1995). Therefore, brand placement provides an opportunity where the involved audience gets exposure to the brands and products during the natural process of narration of the movie.

The audience can undertake multiple tasks while watching a television programme in a home setting, which may affect the level and degree of the attention span of the audience and hence reduce the overall effec- tiveness of the medium for enhancing brand memory. In the case of watching a movie in the theatre, the audience makes a voluntary choice for viewing (expo- sure) at a cost (financial, time, and opportunity cost) for the purpose of entertainment, which makes him more receptive to the information provided. Further, the trend of zapping and change in television usage behaviour due to surfing during commercial breaks has reduced the effectiveness of television commercials. And clearly, brand placements in movies also result in a longer lifespan for the brands than typical adver- tisements (Brennan, Dubas, & Babin, 1999; d’Astous & Chartier, 2000).

While brand placement has obvious advantages, it is not without its disadvantages. Such disadvantages stem from the marketer’s general lack of control over the brand placement process. Exposure does not actu- ally guarantee that the placement will be noticed (Van der Waldt, 2005). Also, there is little control over how and when the brand will be shown or whether it will be shown at all, as the risk of the scene featuring the brand being edited runs high (Bergman, 1989) and the risk of a negative portrayal of the brand in the movie setting (Fleming, 1990). However, despite the pitfalls which may not allow brand placements to stand as the lone marketing tool, it is becoming an increasingly impor- tant part of the integrated marketing strategy.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND HYPOTHESES

Over a period of time, researchers have used a number of terms for the same purpose that somewhat overlap each other. The term advertainment (Russell, 2007) was coined to reflect the increasingly intertwined connec- tions between advertising and entertainment and refers to the promotional practices that integrate brand communications within the content of entertainment

152 CONSUMER RESPONSE TO BRAND PLACEMENT IN MOVIES: INVESTIGATING THE BRAND-EVENT FIT

products. The increased mingling of advertising with the entertainment world has generated a slew of newly coined terms to reflect the trends, such as hybrid adver- tisement (Balasubramanian, 1994), branded entertain- ment (Hudson & Hudson, 2006), and brand placement and product placement. In one of the first reviews of brand placement, Karrh (1998) argues that although product placement is the most commonly used descrip- tion, brand placement would be more correct. He argues that it is a brand (e.g., Ray-Ban) and not a product (e.g., sunglasses) that is placed. However, not many researchers distinguish between the two and, therefore, the terms brand placement and product placement have been used interchangeably throughout the study.

Despite the widespread use of brand placements to reach audiences, it is difficult to ascertain its effective- ness because much of the related data is proprietary (Yang, Roskos-Ewoldsen, & Roskos-Ewoldsen, 2004). Consequently, too little is known about the effect of brand placements given the dynamic nature of this prac- tice (Bhatnagar, Aksoy, & Malkoc, 2004). For example, how the brands are placed in the movies may influence their effectiveness (Ong & Meri, 1994). Indeed, scholars have tested the effect of different types of brand place- ments, such as whether the placement is visual or verbal (Russell, 2002), the visual prominence of the placement (Law & Braun, 2000), and if the placement is involved in the plot of the story or not (Russell, 2002).

While all these past studies on brand placement have been informative, research in the area of product place- ment is still not widespread in the Indian context and is concentrated on studying the impact of product place- ments on a wide, general audience. India, which has a huge and growing section of young consumers who are poised to begin their consumption journey, offers a big future growth market for branded products making it even more important to discover, clarify, and check the effectiveness of brand placements.

BRAND PLACEMENT IN INDIAN MOVIES

Films are a noticeable medium of entertainment in India (Panda, 2004), communicating among other things, the changing fashion trends and promoting market- er’s products and services. Indian audience has always been emotionally involved with onscreen actors and the impact is evident from the fact that stars have iconic status in India. The audience depends heavily on these actors for setting new trends, fashions, and hairstyles (Kripalani, 2006), and it was, therefore, not astonishing

when advertisers and marketers started exploiting mainstream Indian cinema as an opportunity to adver- tise their products and started relying on stars to set trends for costumes, accessories, and other products and services. When the audience watch a movie star with the product placed in the movie, they connect the product with the actor, thus, increasing the intrinsic expressive- ness of the placement messages (Morton & Friedman, 2002) such that when the consumers see the movie star using a certain product, they try to associate the credi- bility of the actor with the product placed in the movie and build a positive behaviour towards the product.

India’s popular Hindi film industry, commonly known as Bollywood, being the largest producer of films in the world (Minocha & Stonehouse, 2006), is fuelled by a large audience eager for consumption (Akram, Dwight, & Muhammad, 2011; Britt, 2002). In addition to the display of national brands, Hollywood’s ‘big players’ of product placement also appear in Indian movies. Coca-Cola, for instance, has benefited from placement in movies in India along with celebrity endorsement by Indian movie star, Amir Khan, helping it increase its market share (Business Week, 2003). Display of both foreign and local brands in the contemporary Indian films is, therefore, a reflection of the globalization forces at play within India, with a number of Indian films being packed with loads of non-Indian product placements. Since Indian or Hollywood movies mostly remain unchanged across countries, international brands, even if placed in local media through cable- cast or broadcast, may serve as a global marketing strategy (Gould, Gupta, & Grabner-Krauter, 2000). It is for this reason that since the last few years, multina- tional brands have looked to Indian movies to reach the Indian market (Rajadhyaksha, 2003).

In addition to placing foreign brands in Indian films, producers of movies have also started exploring different types of product placements, on the lines similar to its Hollywood counterpart. Apart from just a brand place- ment in a movie or a prominent character talking about it, they have started placing products integral to the sto- ryline. The 2002 film, Road, shot mostly on roads with the lead characters driving the cars, featured Tata Motors’ Safari 4-wheel SUV. For this placement, Tata Motors paid about ` 12.5 million (USD 266,250) (Kripalani, 2006). Such a trend of weaving a product into the sto- ryline has become common in the Hindi3 film industry in the past few years. In fact, a recent film Heroine (2012) included several brands that were integral to the movie’s theme. After the release of the movie, Lakme

VIKALPA • VOLUME 41 • ISSUE 2 • APRIL-JUNE 2016 153

launched Heroine branded makeup under the Absolute range, endorsed by Kareena Kapoor (an Indian actress) while apparel brand Jealous 21 introduced a special clothing line inspired by the clothes worn by Kareena in the movie, which narrates the behind-the-scenes life of an actor. Given the efforts made by the advertisers and the enthusiasm with which the audiences are accepting brand placements in the Indian movies, this practice has a huge potential to grow.

Hypotheses

Brand placements are, by definition, brands placed within a medium (Nelson & Deshpande, 2013). How audience members respond to the medium likely impacts their responses to the brands within that medium, too. The body of research studying the influ- ence of context on advertising effectiveness leads to the finding that advertising context consists of two impor- tant concepts: receiver context and medium context. While the receiver context is described as the situa- tional circumstances in which a person is exposed to an advertisement (Pieters & Van Raaij, 1992), such as the person’s physical environment (e.g., ‘at home, at the dining table’), the social environment (e.g., ‘in the company of friends’), the time frame (e.g., ‘during lunch’), and the mental state a person is in prior to expo- sure to the medium content (e.g., ‘an early morning mood’), the medium context concerns the environment of the ad provided by the vehicle carrying it, such as a television programme, a book, a video game, or a film.

Although studies on context effect are not found in the brand placement literature, there is some sugges- tion that the medium context can have an effect on consumers’ responses to an embedded ad (Moorman, Neijens, & Smit, 2005). Some authors have even found a congruency effect between context and embedded ad (priming effect, e.g., Yi, 1990). Therefore, we expect that the medium context should have an effect on the responses to brand placements too. Further, while the medium context may be the same (e.g., films), they may still differ on the basis of culture, such as films made in India and abroad, both of which depict widely different cultures (de Mooij & Hofstede, 2002; Lewis, 2005). In the present study, we conceptualize and explain the clas- sification of film industries into foreign film industry (Hollywood) and domestic film industry (Bollywood), based on their country of origin and term them as the film industry context. Films represent a very typical entertainment medium and each film industry across the globe is influenced by its culture and environment

as a whole; therefore, understanding of the film industry context will help understand the differences between domestic and foreign consumer behaviour. In the present study, the film industry context has been used as one of the independent variables that have two levels, Indian and American. Films that were made in India have been defined as Indian movies while those that were made in America have been classified as American movies.

Until recently, placement of branded products in movies was considered an American concept (Segrave, 2004). However, the Indian mainstream Hindi films have caught up with the trend with the Indian audi- ence not only being exposed to product placement in different media but also being exposed to it in both the national and international entertainment industry. Just as the Indian motion pictures have a huge overseas market, Hollywood movies is a huge craze with the Indian masses. With the coming of video-on-demand and DTH, access to any kind of movies has become easier than before; therefore, like many other countries, Hollywood movies have a significant viewership in India too. Also, interest in Hollywood movies is high, with several Hollywood movies releasing in Indian theatres every month. Given the massive exposure of the Indian audiences to movies, it is a question of legit- imate curiosity to find out the impact that brand place- ments in movies have on the audiences.

Hall’s (1959) theory aims to explain culture on the basis of high and low context which varies across cultures (Hall, 1984). Indian culture, being a high context culture, aims to communicate messages through symbols (deMooij, 1998), including brands which may com- municate the social standing. Hall (1976) also empha- sizes that in a high-context culture, greater confidence is placed in the nonverbal aspects of communication than the verbal aspects. On the other hand, Hollywood films are rooted in a low-context culture. The literature on product placement demonstrates that cultural dif- ferences exist vis-à-vis attitudes towards product place- ment (Gould et al., 2000; Karrh, Frith, & Gallison, 2001). This is primarily because cultural values and communi- cation styles influence advertising persuasion (Aaker & Maheswaran, 1997) and are also likely to influence the way consumers process product placements. In other words, how brand placements communicate is dictated by the cultural context in which they are put. We argue that consumers’ interpretation of brands placed in dif- ferent contexts, namely, domestic versus foreign films will show a potential bias. For example, Coca-Cola has

154 CONSUMER RESPONSE TO BRAND PLACEMENT IN MOVIES: INVESTIGATING THE BRAND-EVENT FIT

been widely used in several international as well as Indian movies. In each of the two scenarios, the same brand might be looked at differently due to its place- ment in two culturally different contexts. An Indian consumer will be able to relate with Coca-Cola more in Rang De Basanti (2006), an Indian film, rather than Coca-Cola in Falling Down (1993). This implies that differences exist in terms of consumers’ response to brands placed in the two different contexts.

In addition to the difference in consumers’ response to brand placements in national and international films due to cultural diversity, we also argue, based on research, that an increase in the number of ads in the environment will have a negative influence on the effectiveness of the target ad or the placed brand (Kent, 1995). Given that Hollywood films contain a greater number of brands overall (Kureshi & Sood, 2011) as compared to Indian films, it is likely that the reaction of viewers towards brands placement in Hollywood movies would be more negative as compared to their reaction towards brand placement in Indian films. In view of the literature on the medium context, cultural differences and the effect of number of brands placed in a movie, we predict that

H1: Brands placed in a national event will create more positive brand evaluations than brands placed in an international event.

Associations between a brand and an event that trigger positive attitudes towards the brand may be an effec- tive marketing strategy, leading to increased sales which could potentially generate a sustainable compet- itive advantage. However, not all brand–event rela- tionships result in a positive outcome for the brand. It has been suggested that when there is congru- ence between the brand and the event, consumers are more likely to respond favourably (Hamlin & Wilson, 2004). Meenaghan (2001) explains that perceptions of congruity reflect the extent to which the sponsored partner is seen as predictable. Therefore, it is highly likely that congruence will allow the brand to generate positive returns, whereas a non-congruent relation- ship may even be detrimental to the brand (Gray, 2000; Hamlin & Wilson, 2004; Murphy, 1996; Simmons & Becker-Olsen, 2006; Welsh, 1999). These studies assume that congruity between brand and event can have a positive influence on consumer responses so that there is a positive attitude towards the event and the brand (Dousteyssier-Fleck, 2004).

The concept of fit, built on congruity theory (Osgood & Tannenbaum, 1955), has been extensively applied to the sponsorship arena and holds that sponsors should seek events that have a logical congruence or fit with the sponsors’ products. There is, however, no evidence of congruence/fit studies in the context of product placements. Nevertheless, given the similarity between product placement and sponsorship, such that both consist of a triangular relationship—a company willing to support a certain activity (the sponsor), a sponsored activity or the target (the sponsee), and in a majority of cases also the different media covering the event or activity (Burnett, 1993)—it is only reasonable to consider that brands being placed in movies are, in a way, spon- soring a part of the movie. For example, brands such as Lakme, Head & Shoulders, Jealous 21, Cera, and so on collectively spent roughly ̀ 250 million on in-film place- ment in the movie Heroine. Therefore, application of fit in the context of product placement may be built on the same logic as that in the context of sponsorship.

Sponsorship literature confirms the importance of congruence on the relationship between brand and event, exemplified by brand image beliefs (Gwinner & Eaton, 1999; Speed & Thomson, 2000). Academics and practitioners have long relied on fit to explain sponsor- ship (Olson & Thjomoe, 2011; Quester & Thompson, 2001). Simmons and Becker-Olsen (2006) showed that high-fit sponsorships (sponsor partner is perceived as congruent with sponsored event) can increase brand value, whereas low-fit (sponsor partner is perceived as incongruent with sponsored event) can dilute brand value. Several studies have shown the impor- tance of a strong link between the sponsor and the sponsored event or entity: the greater the perceived fit of brand associations between the sponsor/endorser and the brand, the greater the impact on the sponsor’s image and the attitudes towards sponsoring itself (McDonald, 1991; Smith, 2004). Since attitudes are found to successfully transfer between parent brands and brand extensions when perceived fit between the two is high (Aaker & Keller, 1990), based on the same argument, it is expected that the degree of fit or congruence between brands and the context in which they appear will determine the extent to which atti- tudes towards the context transfers onto the placed brand. Additionally, when consumers elaborate on the sponsorship and discover a level of congruence, they experience a sense of cognitive satisfaction that influences their evaluation of the sponsoring brand (Meyers-Levy & Tybout, 1989).

VIKALPA • VOLUME 41 • ISSUE 2 • APRIL-JUNE 2016 155

Likewise, strong sponsor–programme congruity sug- gests that the sponsor’s products and activities are clearly related to the contents of the programme, that is, the product placement is likely to be natural and con- sistent with the programme. However, when sponsor– programme congruity is weak, the product placement may be seen as inconsistent and not credible. Therefore, extending this basic finding to brand placement in movies, we expect that brands that are perceived as consistent with the event in which they are placed will lead to positive evaluation of the brand. We therefore hypothesize that

H2: When the presence of the brand is consistent with viewer expectations of the event (high fit), it would create significantly more favourable consumer evaluations than brands that are incon- sistent (low fit) with the event.

Foreign films, being viewed by the Indian audiences in addition to the contemporary Indian films, are sugges- tive of the global forces within India. Films, being a product of culture, reflect the cultural values of the people such that the practices, behaviour, and brands from other cultures flow into the domestic culture (Appadurai, 1996). Just as brands are categorized as foreign or domestic in terms of country of origin, films, as a medium of entertainment, are also labelled as foreign and local (Schaefer & Kavita, 2011). When people are exposed to films, they gather information from them in terms of brand schemas and compare them, which determine their judgement with respect to the appropriateness of the event (McDaniel, 1999). Therefore, we can assume the same forces to play a role in consumers’ evaluation of films that affect their judgement about brands. A match leads to more posi- tive evaluations because affect moves from the event schema to the brand schema (Perrachio & Tybout, 1996).

However, the influence of films/media on consumers is not automatic. Consumers in emerging markets, such as India, may readily accept nonlocal brands due to country-of-origin (COO) effects where foreign brands convey quality or status. Conversely, they may reject foreign brands or their depictions based on consumer ethnocentrism, that is, preference for one’s own coun- try’s products (e.g., Zhou & Russell, 2004).

We hope to examine consumers’ responses in terms of their attitude towards the placed brand and their inten- tion to purchase the brand within the context of COO of the event (and not the brand). Given the individual differences with respect to foreign and domestic brands/

films based on consumer ethnocentrism or openness to other cultures (Batra et al., 2000), we assume the rela- tionships of these factors to have an influence on atti- tudes towards the brand. Past research also suggests that a congruity between the brand and the context in which it is placed has an effect on consumers’ evalu- ation. Specifically, a brand–event fit will draw more favourable responses. Therefore, brand placement and congruity literature suggests that based on cultural differences (Gould et al., 2000; Karrh et al., 2001), which affect the way consumers process product placements (Aaker & Maheswaran, 1997), a low fit between the event and the brand is expected to create more positive evaluation in case of the event being a national event rather than an international event. Therefore,

H3: The low fit between the brand and the event will create more favourable evaluation in a national event context than a low brand–event fit in the context of an international event.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Prior research suggests that the manner in which the brands are presented in the movies, namely in the background, used by the main character or as an inte- gral part of the unfolding story, might lead to different responses from the audience (Russell, 2002). Therefore, the current study focused on only one type of brand placement, that is, the effect of visual brand place- ments, used by the main character in the movie. Visual product placement means that the product is shown prominently in the movie without the mention of the brand name. For the present study, four different movies were selected, each using product placement such that the placement was visual in nature. Second, the study explored the influence of brand placement using both American and Indian movies so as to study the effect of the link between COO of the entertainment event and brand placement in the movie. For the present study, four different movies were selected—two American and two Indian—each using brand placement which was visual in nature. Experimental design was chosen as the method of study in the present research work because of the ability of such designs to test theoretical relations (Bagozzi & Yi, 1989).

Two pilot studies were conducted prior to the main experimental study. The participants for all of the studies were recruited from the same research participant pool at a large university in North India for no extra credit for their participation.

156 CONSUMER RESPONSE TO BRAND PLACEMENT IN MOVIES: INVESTIGATING THE BRAND-EVENT FIT

Pilot Study 1: Selection of the Movies for the Experiment

Ten subjects were asked to list five American and five Indian (Hindi) movies that used brand placement. Subjects were informed that used-by-main-character brand placement should be part of the movies and should be visual brand placement. Used-by-main-character brand placement involved one of the main characters using the brand in some manner such as opening the packet of Tata Tea in the movie, Baghban (2003), by one of the lead characters in that movie while visual brand placement was the one in which no mention of the brand name was made. The subjects were given enough time to think and were allowed to discuss among themselves.

Pilot Study 2: Fit/Misfit Test

The second pre-test was conducted to select the brand– event combination. Out of the list of 50 American and 50 Hindi movies generated by the subjects from the first pre-test, the subjects were asked to separate those movies where the presence of the brand in the movie was a misfit in the movie scene and those where the brand placement and movie scene fitted well. For doing this, the participants were asked to indicate how much they considered the brand–event (movie) fit using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (complete misfit) to 7 (complete fit) for each of the movies listed. Using this data, two American and two Hindi movies were selected (Table 1) with the most fit and least fit.

Table 1: Brand Fit and Misfit with the Event

Entertainment Industry Event–Brand Fit Event–Brand Misfit

American Top Gun Twilight

Hindi Jab Tak Hai Jaan Student of the Year

Source: Author’s analysis.

The two movies selected with the most brand–event fit were Top Gun (Ray-Ban) (1986) and Jab Tak Hai Jaan (Canon) (2012) while the movies selected for the least brand–event fit were Twilight (2008) and Student of the Year (2012).

Pilot Study 3: Brand Stature, Brand Perception, and Brand Familiarity

The third pilot study was conducted to establish if the three selected brands, namely Ray-Ban, Canon, and Apple, had the same stature, were similarly perceived,

and had the same level of familiarity. The pre-test was conducted on 30 participants and analysis of vari- ance (ANOVA) results reflect no significant difference between the three brands, based on stature/importance (F = 1.45, p = 1.89), perception about the brands (F = 0.838, p = 0.502), and level of brand familiarity (F = 1.127, p = 0.343).

Main Study

Design

The study used a 2X2 between-subjects experimental design with two levels of events (American/Hindi movies) and two levels of brand–event fit (high fit/low fit). Each subject was assigned to only one of the four conditions in the experiment.

Participants

For the purpose of this research, a non-probability sampling approach was used. Non-probability sampling is arbitrary and subjective, due to the fact that a partic- ipant does not have a known non-zero chance of being included (Cooper & Schindler, 2006).

The sample chosen for the study was roughly comparable in terms of occupation (all were post-graduate students), gender, and age. A total of 120 students participated in the study (78 females and 42 males) and was drawn from the subject pool of a large Indian university for no extra course credit for their participation. The motivation for this selection was that respondents were thought to be an appropriate sample since young adults (18 to 24 years of age) are passionate film-goers. Moreover, attending movies is a common activity for the age range of the sample (Nebenzahl & Secunda, 1993). Also, many social psychological research studies have used college students as participants but they are usually labelled as ‘adults’ (Arnett, 2000) who possess enough disposable income to attend films (Gough, 2003), making product placement in films an effective way to target young and well-educated consumers. The 120 respondents were divided into four groups such that each group consisted of 30 respondents. Each group was shown one of the four stimuli in the form of a movie clip and their responses were recorded with a standardized scale.

Stimulus

Before the final experiment, five respondents (who were not part of the final study) viewed the four movies

VIKALPA • VOLUME 41 • ISSUE 2 • APRIL-JUNE 2016 157

which were selected from the pre-tests, on a videotape to identify and list the names of all the brands placed in the movie scenes (Table 2).

Table 2: List of Movies, Name of Entertainment Industry, and Brand Placed

Name of the Movie Entertainment Industry Brand Placed

Top Gun American Ray Ban

Twilight American Apple

Jab Tak Hai Jaan Hindi Canon

Student of the Year Hindi Ray Ban

Source: Author’s analysis.

Since all the movies had numerous brand placements, we asked the subjects to identify the scenes where only one brand was placed in a scene. It was also mentioned that the brand should only be a visual prop being used by one of the leading characters of the film but should not be mentioned in the scene. Scenes from the films, where the branded products were featured, were selected. Last, the respondents were also asked if the four movies were comparable in terms of their release time such that none of the films was either too old or too new. It was done to avoid the potential confound of promotional tie-ins and sponsorships that could have drawn the audience’s attention to the brand (Ong & Meri, 1994).

Also, in order to control for star association with the brand, those brand placements were not selected for the final study in which the star of the movie was also endorsing the brand in traditional advertisements, such as Kareena Kapoor was seen holding a Sony Vaio in a scene in Bodyguard (2011) while she is also an endorser of the same brand and can be seen in television adver- tisement as well. It was done to avoid clouding the respondents’ judgement based on their assessment of the celebrity–brand association.

In the brand–event fit for the international event, Ray-Ban sunglasses worn by the protagonist appears prominently in the centre of the screen in one scene from the movie Top Gun (1986). Tom Cruise’s char- acter in the movie, a US Naval Lieutenant Maverick, embodied the image of a cool jet-fighter pilot, and due to the natural cosmetic effects and military look of the sunglasses donned by him in the movie, the brand was considered to be an overall fit in the movie. The event– brand misfit condition selected from the American movie was a scene from the movie Twilight (2008) in

which the female lead of the film was seen working on an Apple computer. The brand was seen to be a misfit with the story of the film which was based on a young adult vampire’s romance with a human.

The movie selected from the Indian panorama in the brand–event fit category was Jab Tak Hai Jaan (2012) in which one of the lead characters of the movie was a Discovery Channel filmmaker and was seen taking shots from her Canon camera. The brand seems to fit perfectly in the movie as the use of the camera is justi- fied by the character in the film. On the other hand, the movie Student of the Year (2012) was selected in the brand–event misfit category. The sunglasses brand Ray-Ban was being used by one of the male leads whose character was a boy from a middle-class background on scholarship, but was seen wearing expensive clothes and branded sunglasses. The audience took notice of this apparent disconnect between the character and the brand and categorized it as a misfit.

Manipulation Check

In order to determine the success of the experimental design, it was necessary to check whether the manip- ulation remained hidden or visibly obvious to the respondents. The present study manipulated fit between the event and the brand, and this manipula- tion was checked by measuring the subjects’ response to five items by Speed and Thompson (2000) that were used to measure brand–event fit in this study (Table 3). This manipulation check was carried out by showing the respondents both the high brand–event fit and low brand–event fit formats. The manipula- tion check, brand–event fit, was assessed by indexing two measures, that is, high and low brand fit. Scores of subjects in the high fit setting (6.3) on a 7-point scale were compared with the scores of subjects in the low-fit setting (3.2). The data supports the intended manipula- tion [F(1, 38) = 5.673, p < 0.05] and confirmed that our manipulation was effective in creating required experi- mental conditions.

Research Design

This study was presented as a movie entertainment study and each session was conducted with 30 partic- ipants. The methodology adopted for this study is comparable to the one used by Gupta and Lord (1998). Subjects participated in small groups. Stimulus tapes for the four treatment conditions were randomly assigned to sessions. Upon arrival at the assigned

158 CONSUMER RESPONSE TO BRAND PLACEMENT IN MOVIES: INVESTIGATING THE BRAND-EVENT FIT

experimental session, subjects were informed that they would be shown a videotape of a movie excerpt and then asked some questions about the movie. The participants were informed about the purpose of the experiment and were allowed to watch the movie clip. The clips of the movies listed above were edited to 30 minutes. The scenes with the target brand placement were placed roughly in the middle of each 30-minute clip and were shown to the subjects.

After watching the movie, subjects completed a ques- tionnaire measuring demographic information, pre- vious exposure to the movie, and enjoyment of the movie they watched. Prior to the testing, respondents were not made aware that the questionnaire was con- cerned with product placements in the films. To check on the cover story, respondents were asked to write down what they thought was the purpose of the study immediately after viewing the movie, with none of the respondents indicating the true purpose.

Respondents completed the questionnaire on brand evaluation by asking them their attitude towards the brand and their intention to purchase. Attitude towards the brand and intention to purchase were

measured using a 7-point scale. The entire task took approximately 20 minutes. Another personality scale was given as a distraction task. After this distraction task, the participants were thanked for their participa- tion and dismissed from the study.

Variable Operationalization

Several measures were modified from existing vali- dated scales and in some cases measures were devel- oped for use in this study based upon the related liter- ature. All measures were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis to assess their psychometric properties and unidimensionality. The final scale items used in the analysis, standardized factor loadings, and reliability estimates are listed in Table 3.

Brand–Event Fit/Misfit

In the present study, the event was operationalized as the appearance of a product in the released film and the context (national event/international event) of its appearance. The fit was conceptualized on a variety of dimensions in the marketing literature. Consistent with Speed and Thompson (2000), however, we did not attempt to tease out the different dimensions of fit in our measure. Rather, we adopted a five-item measure that allowed respondents to consider fit on their own terms without restricting the basis used to define fit. The five items to measure fit, used by Speed and Thompson (2000), were modified to fit the context of this study (Table 3). All items on the perception of event–brand fit were ranked on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = totally disa- gree, 7 = totally agree).

Understanding brand placements requires that researchers measure event attendees’ (i.e., viewers’) perceptions. The two dependent variables measured in the study are the attitude towards the brand placed in the movie and viewers’ intention to purchase the placed brand. The measurement of these constructs has been summarized below.

Attitude towards the Placed Brand

This construct was measured with a three-item scale using the traditional attitudinal aspects of liking and favourable disposition on a 7-point agree–disagree scale (e.g., Bruner & Hensel, 1992).

Table 3: Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results

Scale Items Factor Loadings

Event–Brand Fit (Cronbach’s α = 0.89)

There is a close fit between the placed brand and the movie

0.830

The placed brand and the movie have many similarities

0.748

It makes sense that this brand appears in the movie 0.732

There is a logical connection between the placed brand and the movie

0.701

My image of the placed brand is consistent with my image of the movie

0.675

Attitude towards the Placed Brand (Cronbach’s α = 0.97)

I like the brand placed in the movie 0.874

The brand placed in the movie is a very good brand 0.851

I have a favourable disposition towards the brand 0.817

Purchase Intentions (Cronbach’s α = 0.91)

I would buy the brand placed in the movie 0.890

The next time I want to buy a product of this type, I would consider buying this brand

0.804

Source: Author’s analysis.

VIKALPA • VOLUME 41 • ISSUE 2 • APRIL-JUNE 2016 159

Purchase Intention

The behaviour intention measure used in this study consisted of two items. It allows for a more robust test of the paths from attitude to purchase intentions. Responses were operationalized using a 7-point scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.

Before the final administration of the questionnaire, pre-testing of the questionnaire was carried out for qualitative investigation. Ten respondents were admin- istered the questionnaire for this purpose. Subsequently, the language of one of the questions was simplified. Before the final data collection, respondents were briefed about the purpose of the study and all queries of the respondents were clarified.

RESULTS

A one-way multivariate analysis of variance (one-way MANOVA) was used to determine whether there were any significant differences between the independent groups (brands placed in Indian and American movies) on the dependent variables—attitude towards the brand and intention to purchase. The two dependent varia- bles were found to be highly correlated with each other (correlation coefficient is 0.426; p < 0.05) and given the positive correlation, MANOVA was applied to examine whether there were differences in the respondents’

attitude towards the placed brand and their intention to purchase on two different levels of entertainment event (Indian movies versus international movies).

The multivariate effect (Table 4) was found to be signif- icant, F2,115 = 27.915; Wilks’ Lambda Value = 0.673; p < 0.05; indicating a statistically significant difference in brand evaluation based on entertainment event levels (brands placed in Indian and American movies).

Given the significance of the overall test, the univar- iate main tests were examined. As indicated in Table 5, there are significant differences across the levels of entertainment event, indicating that significant univariate main effects exist for attitude towards the placed brand (Ab), F1,116 = 9.292, p < 0.05 and inten- tion to purchase, F1,116 = 50.067, p < 0.05. Further anal- ysis indicates that mean scores for ‘Overall evaluation of brands appearing in Indian movie’ (M = 5.06) and ‘Overall evaluation of brands appearing in American movie’ (M = 4.37) are statistically different for two independent groups (t = 3.08, p < 0.05). It suggests that entertainment event is significantly predictive of an increase in the evaluation of brands placed in movies such that when a brand appears in an Indian movie, the brand evaluation, measured in terms of Ab and purchase intention, is more as compared to when a brand appears in an American flick. These results indi- cate an overall support for H1.

Table 4: MANOVA Test Results

Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Partial Eta Squared

Entertainment Event Wilks’ Lambda 0.673 27.915 2 115 0.000* 0.327

Brand–Event Fit Wilks’ Lambda 0.750 19.146 2 115 0.000* 0.250

Source: Author’s analysis.

Note: *Significant at p < 0.05 level.

Table 5: Between-subjects Effect

Source Dependent Variable

Type II Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig. Partial Eta Squared

Entertainment Event

Attitude towards Brand (Ab)

4.626 1 4.626 9.292 0.003* 0.074

Purchase Intention 29.284 1 29.284 50.067 0.000* 0.301

Brand–Event Fit

Attitude towards Brand (Ab)

3.085 1 3.085 6.197 0.014* 0.051

Purchase Intention 20.172 1 20.172 34.488 0.000* 0.229

Source: Author’s analysis.

Note: *Significant at p < 0.05 level.

160 CONSUMER RESPONSE TO BRAND PLACEMENT IN MOVIES: INVESTIGATING THE BRAND-EVENT FIT

Further analysis using one-way MANOVA reveals that there is a significant difference in the respondents’ Ab and purchase intention on two levels of brand–event fit (high fit vs. low fit). The multivariate effect (Table 4) is significant (F2.115 = 19.146; p < 0.05). The overall result suggests that the consumers’ evaluation of the brand placed in the movie varies significantly depending on the level of fit (high or low) between the brand and the event, irrespective of the type of event, Indian movies or international movies. There are significant differ- ences across the levels of brand–event fit on brand evaluation indicating that significant univariate main effects exist for attitude towards the placed brand, F1.116 = 6.197, p < 0.05, and intention to purchase, F1.116 = 34.488, p < 0.05 (Table 5). However, to find out in which case the respondents evaluated the placed brand more favourably, mean scores for brand–event fit (M = 5.01) and brand–event misfit (M = 4.427) were measured and were found to be statistically different for the two inde- pendent groups (t = 3.158; p < 0.05). It suggests that when a brand that fits well with the movie appears, the brand evaluations, measured in terms of Ab and purchase intention, is more favourable as compared to when a brand does not fit well with the movie. These results support H2.

Further, a 2X2 (high/low brand–event fit X international movies/Indian movies) between-subjects MANOVA was used to determine if there was a significant effect of brand–event fit and type of event on brand evaluation. As shown in Table 6, the MANOVA results reveal signif- icant main effects of brand–event fit (F2,115 = 19.146; p < 0.05) and entertainment event type (F2,115 = 27.915; p < 0.05), which indicate that the differences in brand– event fit are not equal across the event types for both the dependent variables (Ab and intention to purchase). The multivariate effects show that there is a significant interaction effect of the brand–event fit X event type interaction term on both the dependent variables (F2,115 = 5.404; p < 0.05). When an interaction is significant, the intervening effects of the two independent varia- bles may obscure comparisons between the means of

one independent variable. In this research, the combi- nation of the two independent variables played a more important role in explaining the variability of attitude towards the brand and intention to purchase.

Additionally, specific mean comparisons (Table 7) suggest that the effect of brand–event fit on brand evaluation will be larger when the brand appears in a national event. A significant difference is found (t = 4.02; p < 0.001) in Ab between American (cell mean = 3.17) and Indian (cell mean = 4.80) movies in a low brand–event fit condition. It suggests that in a low brand–event fit condition, brand evaluations will be more positive in case of an Indian movie than when a low fit condition occurs in an American movie. Also, there is a significant difference (t = 3.25; p < 0.001) in purchase intention in the low brand–event fit condition for both Hollywood (cell mean = 3.72) and Hindi (cell mean = 4.92) movies. However, there is no significant difference (t = 1.89; p < 0.41) in Ab between Hollywood (cell mean = 3.91) and Hindi (cell mean = 4.13) movies when the brand–event fit was high. Also, there is no significant difference (t = 1.54; p < 0.32) in purchase intention in the high brand–event fit condition for both Hollywood (cell mean = 3.89) and Hindi (cell mean = 4.21) movies. Therefore, support is found for H3.

Table 7: Mean Comparisons

American Movie Low fit

Indian Movie Low fit

t-values (Sig.)

American Movie High fit

Indian Movie High fit

t-values (Sig.)

Attitude towards Brand (Ab) 3.17 4.80 4.02 (0.001)* 3.91 4.13 1.89 (0.41)

Purchase Intention 3.72 4.92 3.25 (0.001)* 3.89 4.21 1.54 (0.32)

Source: Author’s analysis.

Note: *Significant at p < 0.05 level.

Table 6: Results of MANOVA

Sources

MANOVA

Wilk’s Lambda Effect Size F (p value)

Main Effects

Brand–Event Fit (B-EF)

0.750 0.250 19.146 (0.000)*

Event Type (ET) 0.673 0.327 27.915 (0.000)*

Interaction Effects

B-EF x ET 0.914 0.086 5.404 (0.006)*

Source: Author’s analysis.

Note: *Significant at p < 0.05 level.

VIKALPA • VOLUME 41 • ISSUE 2 • APRIL-JUNE 2016 161

To have a better understanding of the effects of the two independent variables, graphs were constructed showing the mean responses for both of them for each of the dependent variables Figures 1a & 1b.

Figure 1a: Plot for Attitude towards Brand (Ab)

Event Type

4.20

4.30

4.40

4.50

4.80

4.70

Hollywood Bollywood

fit low fit high fit

Es tim

at ed

M ar

gi na

l M ea

ns o

f A b

4.60

Figure 1b: Plot for Intention to Purchase

Event Type

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.00

6.00

5.50

Hollywood Bollywood

fit low fit high fit

Es tim

at ed

M ar

gi na

l M ea

ns o

f P I

Source: Author’s analysis.

The significant interaction for each dependent variable is visually demonstrated by the absence of parallelism of the lines in each of the plots. The ‘attitude towards the placed brand’ plot (Figure 1a) shows that brands with low fit with the movie tend to draw lesser posi- tive attitude towards the placed brand than brands that fit well with the movie. Also, brands placed in Hindi movies generated much more positive attitude towards the placed brand than when brands were placed in American movies. The interaction effect shows that

although there is little difference in the Ab when the brand–event fit is high, the low fit condition leads to more positive attitude towards the placed brand when the brand appears in Hindi movies than when the low brand fit condition appears in Hollywood movies. The plot of ‘purchase intention’ (Figure 1b) shows similar results suggesting that intention to purchase is high when the brand fits well in a Hindi movie while it is less when the brand is a low fit in a Hollywood movie.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

As one of the first attempts to analyse brand placements in the context of Hollywood and Hindi movies vis-à-vis brand fit, this study suggests that the idea of fit, match, or congruence between the brand and the event can be used as a key criterion when explaining brand evalu- ations. Our research takes us one step closer to devel- oping fitting brand placements, as the study extends the applicability of the idea of fit, which was till now largely confined to sponsorship, and subjects it to the explora- tion of finding a fit between brands and specific events, in particular, movies. Results of the present study reveal that such relationships between brand placement and the outcome variables is linked with another construct, perceived fit between the brand and the event.

In this context, the purpose of the study was to examine the extent to which matching the brands and the movies in which they were placed would succeed in generating positive consumer responses in terms of positive brand attitude and intention to purchase the placed brand. The study also hoped to find out the difference in the effect of brand placements, if any, based on the context of the entertainment industry in which they were placed.

Results of this study reveal that brands placed in a national event, which in this case is Hindi movies, will create more positive brand evaluations in terms of positive attitude towards the placed brand and intention to purchase than brands that are placed in an international event, that is, American movies. One can attribute a number of reasons for this result to be true. The Indian film industry has always been a reflection of the customs and traditions of the Indian society (Kripalani, 2006) where the audience has been expressively involved with onscreen actors, trying to imitate their styles. A plausible explanation for the Indian cultural values and communication styles being an influence on message persuasiveness (Aaker & Maheswaran, 1997) is that India is a collectivist society (Hofstede, 2001) where individuals operate as part of

162 CONSUMER RESPONSE TO BRAND PLACEMENT IN MOVIES: INVESTIGATING THE BRAND-EVENT FIT

one or more collectives, such as family or peers. Triandis (1995) argues that Indians are not just collectivist but also score high on vertical collectivism, which means that their desire to stand out from others and admira- tion of status and celebrity is high (Sivadas, Bruvold, & Nelson, 2008). As a result of this verticality, individuals look up to successful people in the hierarchy, such as movie stars. And, since passion among the Indian audi- ences for celebrities is no lesser than idol worshipping (Bhatia, 2000), the impact of such emotional attachment is that when an actor performs in a film, the audience wants to emulate their style and image. What it means in a product placement context is that when a celebrity is seen communicating explicitly through endorsements or implicitly through non-verbal or indirect communication, such as brand placements in movies, the consumers view the brand to be associated with the celebrity whom they admire. Without further investigation of the brand, they make a connection between the film, the actor, the product and its consumption, and look at product placement as a perceptual clue which directs behaviour to purchase a product to satisfy a need or reinforce a social status.

On the other hand, results of the study show that brands placed in Hollywood were not as successful in gener- ating positive consumer reactions as brands placed in Hindi movies. Although, in the product placement literature, the impact of context effects has not yet been thoroughly explored, it may be argued that the level of involvement of the Indian audience with a foreign film, which may not be very high given the cultural differ- ences, may have affected the processing of brands tied to the plot. Brands placed in Hollywood movies may be at a disadvantage in terms of their being embedded in a context which is culturally very different from that of an emerging economy like India. Much like the Indian film industry, Hollywood movies too are a reflection of their society. However, unlike India, the US has an indi- vidualistic culture characterized by individual bene- fits and preferences, personal success, and independ- ence. Evidently, brands placed in such a context are less successful in generating the desired response from an audience which is culturally more collectivist in nature.

Furthermore, findings of the present research have con- tributed to an increased understanding of consumers’ reactions to congruity in brand placement literature. In conjunction with the results of past researches in the field of brand placement (Nelson & Deshpande, 2013), this study reveals that when the presence of a brand is consistent with the context in which it is placed, it would evoke more positive attitudes and behaviour

than an incongruent placement. Evidently, when people are faced with incongruity in a message, they begin to wonder why seemingly disparate elements are paired together in a message for no apparent reason, leading to frustration and negative evaluations (Mandler, 1982). Just as the viewers have become weary of excessive exposure to advertisements in the traditional medium, it is feared that unwarranted and obtrusive brand place- ments that do not fit well with the plot of the movie, is likely to do more harm than good to the sponsors. Also, brands that are subtly placed in the movie and those that are not glaringly forced in the face of the viewer are considered to enjoy a more fitting relation in the film. By doing so, the sponsors are not taking the fun out of the main plot of the movie by focusing too much on brands placed. The brand, therefore, does not become the hero of the movie but is strategically made a part of the scene like a supporting actor.

The direct implication of such a result is that spon- sors need to be very selective in identifying movies in which to place their brands. With both, American and Indian movie business, being multibillion dollar enterprises where hundreds of movies in all genres are produced every year (Minocha & Stonehouse, 2006), it should not be too difficult for sponsors to choose the right film for brand placement. A brand like Aston Martin, used by the protagonist in the James Bond movies, helped the business because the character in the film clearly identified with the brand. The result suggests that the connection between the brand and the film is of significance and needs to be considered for improving brand evaluations.

Evaluation of results further reveals that although a brand that fits well with the context in which it is placed generates a positive evaluation of the placed brand; the condition of a brand–event misfit in a Hollywood context will create more negative evalua- tions among the Indian audiences than if such a discon- nect appeared in a Hindi film. A study by Kureshi and Sood (2011) reveals that American films contain a greater number of brands overall. The likelihood that all the brands featured in the film will have the same level of fit with the character and plot of the movie is not very high. As a result of excessive brands being placed in the movie, two possible outcomes are likely: first, viewers will look at the placement as conspicuous; and second, the misplacement of the brands, if any, in the film will become prominent. With too many brands sharing the screen space in a single exposure or spread out throughout the film, it is likely to draw consumers’

VIKALPA • VOLUME 41 • ISSUE 2 • APRIL-JUNE 2016 163

attention much more and perhaps more negatively as too much exposure of brands will lead the viewer to think of the movie as yet another long commercial. In the Bollywood context, however, where the brand placement in movies is still growing as a new medium of advertising, exposure to brands is relatively less, leading to lesser chances of a misfit.

Additionally, the reason for a misfit leading to less adverse brand evaluations in Indian movies as compared to Hollywood is that while an Indian film is a three-hour long affair, the Hollywood flicks are of a much shorter duration. As a result, the brands that are placed in the Hindi movies are spread over the entire length of the movie and even if there are times where the brand is a misfit with the context, it is likely to be overlooked because of the length of the movie. The same is not true for Hollywood movies where in a much shorter window of exposure, the movie carries a number of brands. And if the brand is perceived to be disconnected from the film, it is likely to be noticed more, generating more negative evaluations. It implies that not only should sponsors be careful in choosing what type of film to place their brands in, but they should also put more emphasis on placing brands in the national entertainment event when trying to reach the Indian audience. As one of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) countries, India presents an impor- tant emerging market with an enormous and affluent middle-class (Bose, 2006). Ever since the global brands have been introduced since 1991, Indians have become consumers of global brands, and thus, India poses to be a huge market for global brands. Based on the find- ings of the present study, it is suggested that multina- tional brands must look at Indian movies as a suitable medium for reaching out to the prospective buyers.

Contribution to Research

Although brand placement has been vastly researched in different contexts, the present research has taken a fresh approach to investigating the effects of brand placements in national and international entertain- ment contexts. And the questions, thus, undertaken to be answered make the research contemporary and useful for marketers who are faced with the ever perplexing question of how and when to use brand placements for greatest effectiveness. Although a few studies have focused on examining the fit between brands and movies, fewer have done so in the context of the Indian film industry and none of the previous studies focused on exploring consumers’ evaluation of

congruent and incongruent brand placements, espe- cially within Hollywood movies, which have a huge viewership among the Indian audiences. By studying the main and interaction effects of fit and entertainment event type on consumers’ brand evaluation, this study offers useful insights to sponsors who are looking at the growing India market for their brands by gauging the way Indian audiences feel about brand placements.

Limitations and Future Research

The present research has advanced our understanding of the fit between the event and the brand in the inter- national and national contexts and its role in the frame- work of brand evaluations. However, the findings of the present research need to be considered in light of some limitations. Any study employing student popu- lation is at risk of external validity shortcomings. Although the critical role of external validity in research process is significant (McGrath & Brinberg, 1983), yet this being a pioneering research study, we placed a heavier emphasis on the internal validity, which can be achieved by employing a relatively homogeneous student sample (Cook & Campbell, 1979). While we aimed at higher levels of internal validity, we recognize that a broader and more robust subject pool needs to be examined before drawing generalizations.

The product placement stimuli were presented outside of the actual movie context. Viewing several placements in isolation is an artificial situation and it is not clear that the effects observed in this research would be repli- cated in a real film-viewing context. The respondents surveyed were not aware of the researchers’ intention of testing respondents’ perceptions of product placements in films. The motive behind this was to recreate a natural viewing environment. Unfortunately, this may have resulted in many respondents regarding the viewing session as purely a form of entertainment and, therefore, failed to notice the placed products in the film clips.

One should also understand that a very narrow stimuli base was used in the present study where the focus was only on the visual placement of brands in the scenes. While used-by-main-character is only one of the types of brand placements used in movies, it is not the only one. As such, these results should be verified for other types of brand placements. In addition, future research should attempt to include additional factors in exam- ining relationships investigated in this article. For example, future researchers may want to find out the outcome of brand evaluations if the brand is used by

164 CONSUMER RESPONSE TO BRAND PLACEMENT IN MOVIES: INVESTIGATING THE BRAND-EVENT FIT

the villain in the movie and if there will be any effect, positive or negative, on the brand image.

Also, researchers need to find answers to the relevant question of what will be the impact on brand place- ment if multiple brands are a part of the same entertain- ment show, such as when a number of brands are used as background props in a movie. An interesting avenue for future research would also be to examine what will happen if the character endorsing a brand in the movie is also a brand ambassador for the same brand and appears in traditional advertising medium? For example, Shah Rukh Khan in Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani (2000) is seen driving a Hyundai car of which he is also the brand ambassador and can be seen endorsing the brand in TV ads as well.

Finally, it is necessary to investigate the extent to which placement findings do not generalize across mediums. For example, consumers may be more tolerant of product placements in television because broad- cast television is an advertising-supported medium. Thus, differences in television and film viewing habits (Russell & Stern, 2006) may also alter the factors that drive the success of brand placements. Studies exam- ining the results of this study with different samples and in different settings are certainly another appro- priate direction for future research.

NOTES

1 Here we are referring to so-called Bollywood movies. 2 Hollywood. 3 Bollywood.

REFERENCES

Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27–41.

Aaker, J. L., & Maheswaran, D. (1997). The effect of cultural orientation on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 315–328.

Akram, A., Dwight, M., & Muhammad, S. A. (2011). Perceived brand globalness in emerging markets and the moder- ating role of consumer ethnocentrism. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 6(4), 291–303.

Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of develop- ment from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1989). On the use of structural equa- tion models in experimental designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(August), 271–284.

Balasubramanian, S. K. (1994). Beyond advertising and publicity: Hybrid messages and public policy issues. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 29–46.

Batra, R., Venkatram, R., Dana, L. A., Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M., & Ramachander, S. (2000). Effects of brand local and nonlocal origin on consumer attitudes in developing countries. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 83–95.

Bergman, C. (1989). Tobacco’s cloudy image on the silver screen. The Christian Science Monitor, 8(July), 19.

Bhatia, T. K. (2000). Advertising in rural India: Language, marketing communication and consumerism. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Press.

Bhatnagar, N., Aksoy, L., & Malkoc, S. A. (2004). Embedded brands within media content: The impact of message, media, and consumer characteristics on placement effi- cacy. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media (pp. 99–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bose, D. (2006). Brand Bollywood: A new global entertainment order. New Delhi: SAGE PUBLICATIONS.

Brennan, I., Dubas, K. M., & Babin, L. A. (1999). The influ- ence of product-placement type and exposure time on product-placement recognition. International Journal of Advertising, 18(3), 323–337.

Bressoud, E., Lehu, J. M., & Russell, C. (2008, June 27–28). Integrating placement and audience characteristics to assess the recall of product placements in film: Findings from a field study. Paper presented at the seventh International Conference Research in Advertising (ICORIA), Antwerp, Belgium.

Britt, B. (2002). Content, commerce deals offer answers in overseas markets. Advertising Age, 73(42), 18–22.

Bruner, G. C., & Hensel, P. J. (1992). Marketing scales handbook. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

Burnett, J. J. (1993). Promotion management. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin.

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2006). Business research methods (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

d’Astous, A., & Chartier, F. (2000). A study of factors affecting consumer evaluations and memory of product place- ments in movies. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 22(2), 31–40.

de Gregorio, F., & Sung, Y. (2010). Understanding attitudes toward and behaviors in response to product place- ment: A consumer socialization framework. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 83–96.

VIKALPA • VOLUME 41 • ISSUE 2 • APRIL-JUNE 2016 165

Deigh, R. (1985, October 28,). Softest of sells: Placing products in movies can be a lucrative business. Washington Times, A9-A10.

Deloitte. (2005). TMT trends: Predictions, 2005: A focus on the media sector. Retrieved 21 January 2014, from https:// industriasdecontenido.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/ deloitte-tendencias-medios-ww-2005.pdf

DeLorme, D. E. (1998). Brand placement: A historical over- view. In Darrel D. Muehling (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1998 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 305–306). Pullman, WA: American Academy of Advertising.

deMooij, M. (1998). Global marketing and advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

deMooij, M., & Hofstede, G. (2002). Convergence and diver- gence in consumer behavior: Implications for interna- tional retailing. Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 61–69.

Dousteyssier-Fleck, N. (2004). An application processing models sponsorship information: The role of congruency. Proceedings of the first journée thématique sur marketing communi- cations, Northeast of France.

Eagle, L. (2007). Commercial media literacy: What does it do, to whom—and does it matter? Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 101–110.

Fitzgerald, K. (2002, June 10). Eager sponsors raise the ante. Advertising Age, 18.

Fleming, M. (1990, May 9). Product pluggola padding pic producers budgets. Variety, p. 1.

Fontaine, I. (2001, April). Le placement de marques dans les films: Apports du cadre théorique de la mémoireimplicite et prop- osition d’uneméthodologie [The placement of brands in movies: Contributions of the theoretical framework of implicit memory and proposal methodology]. Working paper 287, DMSP Research Centre, University of Paris IX Dauphine.

Fontaine, I. (2002, May 23–24). Impact persuasif du rôleaccordé aux marques au sein de supports non publicitaires: le cas du placement de marques dans les films [Persuasive impact of the role given to marks in non- advertising media: The case of brand placement in movies]. Proceedings of the 18th Congrès de l’Association Française du Marketing, Lille, 177–200.

Gough, P. J. (2003). Agencies explore product placement, find consumers receptive. Retrieved 21 January 2014, from www. media-post.com-/dtls_dsp_news.cfm? NewsId=229914/

Gould, S. J., Gupta, P. B., & Grabner-Krauter, S. (2000). Product placements in movies: Across-cultural anal- ysis of Austrian, French and American consumers’ atti- tudes toward this emerging, international promotional medium. Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 41–58.

Gray, R. (2000, May). Developing a tight fit is crucial to CRM. Marketing, 37–38.

Grein, A. F., & Gould, S. J. (1996). Globally integrated marketing communications. Journal of Marketing Communications, 2(3), 141–158.

Gunn, E. (2001). Product placement prize. Advertising Age, 72(7), 10.

Gupta, P. B., & Gould, S. J. (2007). Recall of Products placed as prizes versus commercials in game show. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20(1), 43–53.

Gupta, P. B., & Lord, K. R. (1998). Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20(1), 47–59.

Gwinner, K. P., & Eaton, J. (1999). Building brand image through event sponsorship: The role of image transfer. Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 47–57.

Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday.

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.

Hall, E. T. (1984). The dance of life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/ Anehor.

Hamlin, R. P., & Wilson, T. (2004). The impact of cause branding on consumer reactions to products: Does product/cause ‘fit’ really matter? Journal of Marketing Management, 20(7/8), 663–681.

Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Hudson, S., & Hudson, D. (2006). Branded entertainment: A new advertising technique or product placement in disguise? Journal of Marketing Management, 22(5/6), 489–504.

Hulin-Salkin, B. (1989). Movie tie-ins. Incentive, 163(6), 36–41.

Jaffe, J. (2005). Life after the 30-second spot: Energize your brand with a bold mix of alternatives to traditional advertising. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Karrh, J. A. (1998). Brand placement: A review. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20(2), 31–49.

Karrh, J. A., Frith, K. T., & Gallison, G. (2001). Audience atti- tudes toward brand (product) placement: Singapore and the United States. International Journal of Advertising, 20(1), 3–24.

Karrh, J. A., McKee, K. B., & Pardun, C. J. (2003). Practitioners’ evolving views on product placement effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 138–149.

Kent, R. J. (1995). Competitive clutter in network television advertising: Current levels and advertiser responses. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(1), 49–57.

Kretchmer, S. B. (2004). Advertainment: The evolution of product placement as a mass media marketing strategy. Journal of Promotion Management, 10(1/2), 37–54.

Kripalani, M., & Clifford, M. L. (2003, February 10). Finally Coke gets it right. Business Week, p. 18.

166 CONSUMER RESPONSE TO BRAND PLACEMENT IN MOVIES: INVESTIGATING THE BRAND-EVENT FIT

Kripalani, C. (2006). Trendsetting and product placement in Bollywood film: Consumerism through consumption. New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film, 4(3), 197–215.

Kureshi, S., & Sood, V. (2011). In-Film placement trends: A comparative study of Bollywood and Hollywood. Journal of Indian Business Research, 3(4), 244–262.

Law, S., & Braun, K. A. (2000). I’ll have what she’s having: Gauging the impact of product placements on viewers. Psychology and Marketing, 17(12), 1059–1075.

Lewis, R. D. (2005). Finland, cultural lone wolf. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cogni- tion: The 17th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Matthews, R. G. (2005, February 18). London stage hosts U.S. marketers. The Wall Street Journal, B3.

McDaniel, S. (1999). An investigation of match-up effects in sport sponsorship advertising: The implications of consumer advertising schemas. Psychology and Marketing, 16(2), 163–184.

McDonald, C. (1991). Sponsorship and the image of the sponsor. European Journal of Marketing, 25(11), 31–38.

McDonnell, J., & Drennan, J. (2010). Virtual product place- ment as a new approach to measure effectiveness of placements. Journal of Promotion Management, 16(1/2), 25.

McGrath, J. E., & Brinberg, D. (1983). External validity and the research process: A comment on the Calder/Lynch dialogue. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(1), 115–124.

McKechnie, S. A., & Zhou, J. (2003). Product placement in movies: A comparison of Chinese and American consumers’ attitudes. International Journal of Advertising, 22(2), 349–374.

Meenaghan, T. (2001). Understanding sponsorship effects. Psychology and Marketing, 18(2), 95–122.

Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39–54.

Minocha, S., & Stonehouse, G. (2006). The ‘learning trap’: A Bollywood frame for strategic learning. Management Decision, 44(1), 1344–1362.

Moorman, M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2005). The effects of program responses on the processing of commercials placed at various positions in the program and the block. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(1), 49–59.

Morton, C. R., & Friedman, M. (2002). ‘I saw it in the movies’: Exploring the link between product placement beliefs and reported usage behavior. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 24(2), 33–40.

Moser, H. R., Bryant, L., & Sylvester, K. (2004). Product place- ment as a marketing tool in film and television. National Social Science Journal, 22(1), 76–86.

Murphy, I. P. (1996). Finding nonprofit partner is not as easy as it seems. Marketing News, 30(20), 23.

Nebenzahl, I. D., & Secunda, E. (1993). Consumers’ attitudes toward product placement in movie. International Journal of Advertising, 12(1), 1–11.

Nelson, M. R. (2002). Recall of brand placements in computer/ video games. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(2), 80–89.

Nelson, M. R., & Deshpande, S. (2013). The prevalence of and consumer response to foreign and domestic brand place- ment in Bollywood movies. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 1–15.

Nelson, M. R., Keum, H., & Yaros, R. A. (2004). Advertainment or adcreep: Game players’ attitudes toward advertising and product placements in computer games. Journal of Interactive Media, 5(1), 3–30.

O’Neill, E., & Barrett, M. (2004). TiVo—the next big thing— DVRs and television advertising models. Sixth World Media Economics Conference, HEC Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

O’Reilly, D., Cripps, R., Kazani, E., Patel, R., & Zarra, A. (2005). Interpretation of product placement by UK movie-goers: A qualitative study. Thirty-fourth European Marketing Academy Conference (EMAC), Milan, Italy.

Olson, E. L., & Thjomoe, H. M. (2011). Explaining and artic- ulating the fit construct in sponsorship. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 57–70.

Ong, B. S., & Meri, D. (1994). Should product placement in movies be banned. Journal of Promotion Management, 2(3/4), 159–175.

Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955). The prin- ciple of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 62(1), 42–55.

Panda, T. K. (2004). Consumer response to brand placements in films: Role of brand congruity and modality of pres- entation in bringing attitudinal change among consumers with special reference to brand placements in Hindi films. South Asian Journal of Management, 11(4), 7–25.

Peracchio, L. A., & Tybout, A. M. (1996). The moderating role of prior knowledge in schema-based product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 177–191.

Pieters, R., & Van Raaij, F. (1992). Reclame werking [Advertising effectiveness]. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese.

Quester, P. G., & Thompson, B. (2001). Advertising and promotion leverage on arts sponsorship effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(1), 33–47.

Rajadhyaksha, A. (2003). The ‘bollywoodization’ of the Indian cinema: Cultural nationalism in a global arena. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 4(1), 25–39.

Russell, C. A. (1998). Towards a framework of product place- ment: Theoretical propositions. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 357–362.

VIKALPA • VOLUME 41 • ISSUE 2 • APRIL-JUNE 2016 167

Russel, C. A. (2002). Investigating the effectiveness of product placement in television shows: The role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and atti- tude. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 306–318.

Russel, C. A. (2007). Advertainment: Fusing advertising and entertainment (Published PhD thesis). University of Michigan Yaffe Center for Persuasive Communication.

Russell, C. A., & Belch, M. (2005). A managerial investigation into the product placement industry. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(1), 73–92.

Russell, C. A., & Stern, B. B. (2006). Consumers, characters, and products: A balance model of Sitcom product place- ment effects. Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 7–21.

Schaefer, D. J., & Kavita K. (2011). Bollywood cinema at the crossroads: Tracking the dimensions of globalization in postcolonial popular Hindi cinema. Mass Communication and Society, 14(6), 700–719.

Segrave, K. (2004). Product placement in Hollywood films: A history. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company, Inc.

Siddique. (2011). Bodyguard [Motion picture]. India: Hindi.

Simmons, C. J., & Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 154–169.

Sivadas, E., Bruvold, N. T., & Nelson, M. R. (2008). A reduced version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale: A four-country assessment. Journal of Business Research, 61(3), 201–210.

Smith, B. (1985). Casting product for special effect. Beverage World, 104(March), 83–91.

Smith, G. (2004). Brand image transfer through sponsorship: A consumer learning perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(3/4), 457–474.

Speed, R., & Thompson, P. (2000). Determinants of sports sponsorship response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 226–238.

Steel, E. (2007, May 25). Advertising’s brave new world. Wall Street Journal, p. B1.

Steortz, E. (1987). The cost efficiency and communication effects associated with brand name exposure within motion pictures (Unpublished master’s thesis). West Virginia University.

Stephen, A. T., & Coote, L. V. (2005). Brands in action: The role of brand placements in building consumer-brand iden- tification. American Marketing Association Conference Proceedings, Chicago, 16, 28.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CA: Westview Press.

Turcotte, S. (1995). Gimme a bud! The feature film product place- ment industry (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Texas, Austin.

Turner, K. J. (2004). Insinuating the product into the message: An historical context for product placement. Journal of Promotion Management, 10(1/2), 9–14.

Van der Waldt, D. L. R. (2005). The role of product placement in feature films and broadcast television programmes: An IMC perspective. Communicare, 24(2), 1–16.

Welsh, J. C. (1999). Good cause, good business. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 21–24.

Winkler, T., & Buckner, K. (2006). Receptiveness of gamers to embedded brand messages in advergames: Attitudes towards product placement. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(1), 37–46.

Yang, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Mental models for brand placement. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 79–98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Yi, Y. (1990). Cognitive and affective priming effects of the context for print advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 19(2), 40–49.

Zhou, N., & Russell, W. B. (2004). Chinese consumer read- ings of global and local advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising, 33(3), 63–76.

Komal Nagar, PhD, is a Senior Assistant Professor of Marketing in The Business School, University of Jammu, Jammu. Her major research interests are in the area of Advertising and Marketing communications. Her research work has appeared in Vikalpa (IIMA),

Management Review (IIMB), Global Business Review (Sage Publication), Vision (MDI-Gurgaon), NICE Journal of Business, Journal of Services Research, and so on.

e-mail: [email protected]

Copyright of Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.