business statistics
Title: BUS105 Computing Assignment semester 2,2017
Name: Sushma GHISING TAMANG
Student number: 11701123
Allocated Sample:
The section 1 dataset consists of a population of 100,000 people split into 10,000 samples of size 10 the variables in the dataset are “income” and annual contribution to super, So you show the relationship between the variables graphically using a scatterplot and regression. You need to suppose that someone wants to predict the contribution of a person with income $200,000.
The scatter plot below shows the relationship between the variables
income” and “annual contribution to savings” for 100,000 people so 100,000 points
Using the whole population all 100,000 points the regression line is predicted annual contribution y=0.1351*x+181.2 so if the predicted annual contribution is 0.1351*200,000+181.2=27201.2
the z score (27201.2-27000)/2100= 0.0958
using wolfram alpha P(Z<0958) = 0.53816
So, if we compare 10,000 samples then expected rank will be
Predicted rank = P (Z<0958) *10000=0.53816*10,000=5381.6
Section 2
The variables mentioned are risk level (r or s), where “r” refers to the risky investment plan and ‘s’ refers to safer investment plan
|
sample |
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Count of made a loss (L or P)? |
Column Labels |
|
|
|
Row Labels |
L |
P |
Grand Total |
|
r |
14 |
50 |
64 |
|
s |
4 |
32 |
36 |
|
Grand Total |
18 |
82 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sample |
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Count of made a loss (L or P)? |
Column Labels |
|
|
|
Row Labels |
L |
P |
Grand Total |
|
r |
21.88% |
78.13% |
100.00% |
|
s |
11.11% |
88.89% |
100.00% |
|
Grand Total |
18.00% |
82.00% |
100.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
From the result we got in the above table, the loss of r is 21.88% which is more than comparing of s (11.11%) and similarly r has less profit than s(88.89%) which is 78.13%.
So the difference in proportions is -=0.2188-0.1111-=0.1077
So the zscore for that estimate is (0.1077-0.1)/0.0743= 0.1036
P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<-0.1036) = 0.541257
IF there was a list of 4000 estimates ranked from lowest to highest, the expected rank will be expected rank = P(Z<zscore)*4000= 0.541257*4000=2165.028
Section 3
|
sample |
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Row Labels |
Count of High risk ? |
Average of return |
StdDev of return |
|
n |
70 |
0.034585714 |
0.003196433 |
|
y |
30 |
0.054333333 |
0.098319793 |
|
Grand Total |
100 |
0.04051 |
0.054051135 |
|
|
|
|
Comments:
As compared to y, n has the high count of risk. Average of return for y is higher than n and standard deviation is also higher for y than n.
So the difference in the sample means =0.0345-0.0543=-0.0198
The zscore of this estimate =(-0.0198- -0.0256)/ 0.0173= 0.3352
using wolframalpha.com P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<0.3352)=0.631263
If there was a list of 2000 estimates ranked from lowest to highest, what rank do you think your would be close to, hint just use the formula expected rank = P(Z<zscore)*2000= 0.631263*2000=1262.526
|
sample |
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Row Labels |
Count of High risk ? |
Average of return |
StdDev of return |
|
n |
70 |
0.034585714 |
0.003196433 |
|
y |
30 |
0.054333333 |
0.098319793 |
|
Grand Total |
100 |
0.04051 |
0.054051135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
sample |
173 |
|
|
|
|
Row Labels |
Count of do you support proposed change? |
|
no |
74 |
|
yes |
138 |
|
Grand Total |
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 4
population proportion of people that say yes is p=120,000/200,000=0.6
Sample proportion of people that say yes is =138/212 =0.6509
So the zscore =(0.6509-0.6)/0.0357=-1.4257
P(Z<zscore)=P(Z<1.4257)=0.9230 So if we compare sample 700 to the 1000 other estimates then we expect the rank to be 0.9230*1000=923
Section 5
The data set is as shown in figure 1 below
|
Motorcycle Brand |
Number in Stock |
Average Price |
Country of Origin |
|
Yamaha |
25 |
$10,020 |
Japan |
|
BMW |
45 |
$12,000 |
Germany |
|
Ducati |
77 |
$23,000 |
Italy |
|
Honda |
24 |
$9,000 |
Japan |
|
Suzuki |
75 |
$8,500 |
Japan |
|
Kawasaki |
56 |
$7,200 |
Japan |
The 2 variable pivot table is as below
|
Row Labels |
Sum of Number in Stock |
|
BMW |
45 |
|
Ducati |
77 |
|
Honda |
24 |
|
Kawasaki |
56 |
|
Suzuki |
75 |
|
Yamaha |
25 |
|
Grand Total |
302 |
The pivot table gives a summary of data presented in the table with options to truncate what data is to be viewed and which data to leave out. With a more advanced pivot table, the data can be grouped according to the country of origin of the bikes. This feature can be used to organize a large amount of data in excel automatically and prepare the data for presentation.
Section 6: Discussion
The student’s assignment from 2015 brings to perspective the usefulness of statistics in business. It highlights that it allows the business to get an idea of what people think of a business’ product with regard to market research in order to best develop a product before launching it. The student begins by introducing data collection methods but immediately focuses on taste tests as conducted in Sidney with the use of taste booths and surveys filled out during the exercise.
The study seeks to get information on the preferred version of a snack, the gender that likes it more, if they actually like the product, how much they would pay for the product, their ages, if the product meets their taste needs and if the product comes off as a salty or sweet snack. The researcher introduces a quote by Driskell that says, “the main difference between men and women when it comes to snacks is that women are likely to eat due to stress, while men are less interested in the nutritional information.”
In section 3, he begins to present the data collected in two way tables. He first shows results of how males and females like or hate the product. Presenting this also in a graphical chart, the researcher notes that more males like the product than females. A hypothesis test is conducted to check if the relationship between gender and liking or disliking the product. For this, the researcher checks if the variables are dependent. The test confirms that there is no strong evidence that the variables are dependent thus nullifying Driskell’s quote. A similar test is conducted on the relationship between gender and the amount they would pay for the product, and at this point, confidence intervals are used as well. In conclusion, the report demonstrates how numbers and figures can be used to summarise information and give insight to the business
annual contribution 174470.0 207270.0 196590.0 190910.0 150700.0 239840.0 263450.0 240160.0 194140.0 83170.0 21808.8 35857.7 28309.0 28063.8 15522.1 21825.4 37409.9 32901.9 27373.7 11311.1