IFSM
GRADING RUBRIC:
|
Criteria |
90-100%
Far Above Standards |
80-89%
Above Standards |
70-79%
Meets Standards |
60-69%
Below Standards |
< 60%
Well Below Standards |
Possible Points |
|
As-Is Process Analysis Analysis describes the hiring process in terms of CIC requirements. |
18-20 Points 10 steps in logical sequence and responsible position appropriately identified; clearly derived from the Case Study, and demonstrates sophisticated analysis. |
16-17 Points 10 steps in logical sequence with responsible position identified; derived from the Case Study, and demonstrates effective analysis. |
14-15 Points 10 steps are mostly in sequence and logical; responsible position identified; related to the Case Study. |
12-13 Points Fewer than 10 steps and/or responsible position not identified and/or is not related to the Case Study, and/or contains significant incorrect information. |
0-11 Points Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort and/or is not original work for this class section. |
20
|
|
To-Be Process Analysis Analysis describes how the system will support the new hiring process |
18-20 Points To-Be Process step clearly relates to corresponding As-Is Process step and fully explains how the system will support it; demonstrates sophisticated analysis. |
16-17 Points To-Be Process step relates to corresponding As-Is Process step and explains how the system will support it; demonstrates effective analysis. |
14-15 Points To-Be Process step provided for each As-Is Process step and an explanation is provided for each. |
12-13 Points Fewer than 10 To-Be Process steps and/or explanations are provided; and/or contains significant incorrect information. |
0-11 Points Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort and/or is not original work for this class section. |
20
|
|
Business Benefits of Improved Process Explains how each step in the process can contribute to the overall business strategy |
18-20 Points Improvements for all 10 process steps are fully explained; demonstrates sophisticated analysis. |
16-17 Points Improvements for all 10 process steps are explained; demonstrates effective analysis. |
14-15 Points Improvements for all 10 process steps are included. |
12-13 Points Improvements for fewer than 10 process steps are provided; and/or contains significant incorrect information. |
0-11 Points Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort and/or is not original work for this class section. |
20 |
|
Expected Improvements Issues from case study and improvements due to technology in areas of Communication, Structure, and Relationships |
18-20 Points Issues and improvements for all 3 areas are fully explained; demonstrates sophisticated analysis. |
16-17 Points Issues and improvements for all 3 areas are explained; demonstrates effective analysis. |
14-15 Points Issues and improvements for all 3 areas are provided. |
12-13 Points Issues and improvements for fewer than 3 areas are provided; and/or contains significant incorrect information. |
0-11 Points Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort and/or is not original work for this class section. |
20
|
|
Research Two or more sources--one source from within the IFSM 300 course content and one external (other than the course materials) |
9-10 Points Required resources are incorporated and used effectively. Sources used are relevant and timely and contribute strongly to the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style. |
8.5 Points
At least two sources are incorporated and are relevant and somewhat support the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style.
|
7.5 Points
Only one resource is used and properly incorporated and/or reference(s) lack correct APA style. |
6.5 Points
A source may be used, but is not properly incorporated or used, and/or is not effective or appropriate; and/or does not follow APA style for references and citations. |
0-5 Points
No course content or external research incorporated; or reference listed is not cited within the text. |
10 |
|
Format Uses outline format provided; includes Title Page and Reference Page |
9-10 Points Well organized and easy to read. Very few or no errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person and presented in a professional format. |
8.5 Points Effective organization; has few errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person and presented in a professional format. |
7.5 Points Some organization; may have some errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling. Report is double spaced and written in third person. |
6.5 Points Not well organized, and/or contains several grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or is not double-spaced and written in third person. |
0-5 Points Extremely poorly written, has many grammar and/or spelling errors, or does not convey the information. |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL Points Possible |
100 |