Business Finance - Management Financial Risk Management Assignment

profileSJ/-
SQAFRMAssignmentBrief.docx

ELECTRONIC ASSIGNMENT COVERSHEET

Course/Unit Information

Course

Extended Diploma in Finance and Risk Management

Unit Name

Financial Risk Management

Instructor Information

Name

Assignment Information

Schedule Code

Full/ Part Assignment

Full Assignment

Date Assignment Issued

Click or tap to enter a date.

Date Assignment Due

Click or tap to enter a date.

Student Information

(To be filled by the student prior submitting the assignment)

Name

Student ID

Email

Your assignment should meet the following requirements. Please confirm this by ticking 🗹 the boxes before submitting your assignment

The first page is completely labeled with my name, instructor name and assignment information.

I have completed and ticked the declaration page.

The contents of my assignment have been submitted to Turnitin and I have downloaded the report.

I have strictly followed Harvard Referencing Style and Citations.

STUDENT DECLARATION

I hereby confirm that this assignment is my own work and not copied or plagiarized. It has not previously been submitted as part of any assessment for this qualification. All the sources, from which information has been obtained for this assignment, have been referenced as per Harvard Referencing format. I further confirm that I have read and understood the Westford rules and regulations about plagiarism and copying and agree to be bound by them.

Declaration

Date of Submission

Tick the box to agree

Click or tap to enter a date.

LEARNING OUTCOMES AND ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK

Name of the Assessor

Module Title

Financial Risk Management

Module Learning Outcomes

LO1

Critically discuss the building blocks of risk management

LO2

Critically assess how firms manage financial risk

LO3

Critically discuss the Governance of Risk Management

LO4

Critically analyze models for valuing financial portfolios

Assessment Types

Marks

Marks Achieved

Project Format

Introduction – Profiles of Organizations selected

15

Critically discuss the building blocks of risk management

20

Critically assess how firms manage financial risk

25

Understand the Governance of Risk Management

20

Critically analyze models for valuing financial portfolios

20

Overall Score

100

Overall Grade

Click or tap to enter a date.

Summative Feedback:

Overall Feedback on current work with emphasis on how the student can further improve in future.

The following grading criteria will be applicable for the course, Executive Diploma in International Business and Strategy:

Marks

Grade

70 to 100

A - Distinction

60 to 69

B - Merit

50 to 59

Pass

40 to 49

Fail with Resubmit

0 to 39

Fail with Retake

GENERAL GUIDELINES

(Please read the instructions carefully)

1. Complete the title page with all necessary student details and ensure that the signature of the student is marked in the declaration form.

2. All assignments must be submitted as an electronic document in MS Word to the LMS (Use 12 Times New Roman script).

3. All assignments must be submitted with an accompanying Turnitin report.

4. Assignment that is not submitted to the LMS by the prescribed deadline will be accepted ONLY under the REDO and RESIT submission policy of Westford.

5. The results are declared only if the student has met the mandatory attendance requirement of 75% and/or a minimum of 50% under extenuating circumstances approved and ratified by the Academic Director. The student has to repeat the module (with additional fees applicable) if the attendance is below 50%.

6. The assignment should not contain any contents including references cited from websites like www.ukessays.com , www.studymode.com , www.slideshare.net , www.scribd.com .

7. Students can refer Wikipedia as a source of information, but the references cited in Wikipedia must be mentioned.

8. Submit the assignment in a MS Word document with the file name being:

First Name Last Name_ abbreviation of the subject.

Example: John Smith_FRM

Quick reference Checklist for the Faculty/Instructor to accept/reject the assignment before evaluation:

Adherence to the deadline of submission date.

Original file, cover sheet and format retained.

Student information and signature intact.

Font style and size used as instructed.

Harvard Referencing Style is strictly followed.

Assignment

Financial Risk Management

Learning Outcome 1: Critically discuss the building blocks of risk management.

· PC 1.1: Critically discuss the impact of an event on the risk profile of an organization.

· PC 1.2: Critically evaluate the risk management process of an organisation

· PC 1.2: Critically evaluate the tools and procedures used by an organization to measure and manage risk.

· PC 1.3: Critically assess the potential impact of operational and financial risks on an organization.

Learning Outcome 2: Critically assess how firms manage financial risk.

· PC 2.1: Critically evaluate strategies for measuring risk.

· PC 2.2: Apply risk mitigation strategies to operational and financial risks.

· PC 2.3: Critically discuss current risk management issues and strategies adopted by firms.

Learning Outcome 3: Critically discuss the Governance of Risk Management

· PC 3.1: Critically discuss best practices in corporate governance in relation to risk management.

· PC 3.2: Critically discuss the interdependence of functional units within a firm with risk management.

· PC 3.3: Critically assess the role and responsibilities of organizational audit committee in managing complex ethical issues.

Learning Outcome 4: Critically analyze models for valuing financial portfolios.

· PC 4.1 Conceptualize the challenges in decision making using two financial modelling techniques.

· PC 4.2 Critically evaluate the components and derivation of the Capital Asset Pricing Model

· PC 4.3 Undertake critical evaluation for the application of the Capital Asset Pricing Model

Assignment Task

Report [100 Marks] [6000 Words]

Read the following Scenario and prepare a Formal Business & Financial Review Document with the guidelines provided.

Scenario:

For answering the questions, you must demonstrate an understanding of risk management strategies and models adopted and implemented by the organization within a particular sector in dealing with the impact of COVID-19. Here you can select the company and sector of your choice.

You are required to present a Formal Business Report, that would contain a neatly designed Table of Contents to capture the main and sub-topics in an orderly fashion which should adhere to meeting the assessment standards and grading criterion:

a.) Briefly give a background of the chosen organization, it’s industry and impact on its risk profile due to pandemic.

b.) In reference to the chosen organization, critically evaluate the risk management process adopted by the company detailing quantitative and qualitative approaches used to measure and manage the risk due to pandemic COVID-19. Further, classify these risks into operational and financial risks and critically assess their intensity of impact within different functionality of the company. This could be conceptualized by means of an illustrative model such as matrix, bubble chart or any similar tool.

c.) As a response to prepare for the implications due to COVID-19, demonstrate application of hedging strategies for managing operational and financial risks. Compare and contrast mitigation strategies, with detailed assessment of tools like derivative instruments. Review recent research academic and non-academic articles to demonstrate awareness of the current issues and critically discuss strategies of risk management adopted by the firms during pandemic.

d.) With adequate evaluation of risk management strategies above, critically discuss the best practices of corporate governance implemented in the industry of chosen organization. Critically discuss their interrelationship with the risk management strategies. To keep strategies in adequate implementation, draw critical arguments in assessing the roles and responsibilities of audit committee in managing ethical issues, especially in the challenging times wherein strategic transformation and adaptation has been a key measure.

e.) The risk management strategies have evolved with time and macro-economic challenges; therefore, critically analyze the challenges faced in applying two modelling techniques. In the same parlance, conceptualize and interpret modern portfolio theory with Markowitz efficient frontier. Understand and critically evaluate the components of Capital Asset Pricing Model. Critically discuss the application of CAPM model in the current scenario using wide range of resources.

Note:

1. For answering the questions above, chosen organization and its industry should be used as the basis for analysis and application of academic concepts, considering the response to COVID-19 as the underlining theme for the report. Any comparison, contrasts with competitors and recommendations can be included. Support answers with data and research.

2. Presentation & References: You should present the whole document in methodical manner and should remain aligned to appropriately demonstrate correct application of the Harvard Referencing System (HRS).

Performance Descriptors

Performance descriptors indicate how marks will be arrived at against each of the above criteria. The descriptors indicate the likely characteristics of work that is marked within the percentage bands indicated.

Assessment Criteria

(70-100%)

Work of an outstanding, excellent & v. good standard (*)

(60-69%)

Work of a good standard.

(50-59%)

Work of a pass standard.

D (40-49%)

Fail

E (0-39%)

Fail

Understand the building blocks of risk management

(15+20%)

Assignment produces an excellent analysis of the operational and financial risks by reviewing the risk management decisions in a well explained manner to present its significance, by draw comparisons across peer group companies within the segment. Additionally domain specific industry reports are reviewed to narrate current macro-economic events which provide and propose reasons for changes with comparisons by stating means of improvement futuristic goals including quantitative and qualitative measures.

Excellent understanding demonstrated to critically examining judgements and estimates used for analyzing the potential impact of each type of risks within organization. Application and critical analysis to be demonstrated for risk management.

Assignment produces accurate & relevant information to evidence and support factual analysis of companies operational and financial risks which produced accurate accounting and management decisions ,that have been reasonably explained as to their share its significance, draw comparisons within the segment. Additionally domain specific industry reports have been reviewed to capture the current macro-economic events in a satisfying manner to provide and propose reasons for changes with comparisons by stating means of improvement futuristic goals including quantitative and qualitative measures.

Good understanding demonstrated to critically examining judgements and estimates used for analyzing the potential impact of each type of risks within organization. Application and critical analysis to be demonstrated for risk management. Grammar & spelling accurate and fluent. Thoughts and views clearly expressed. Presentation is orderly and of good standards, minor syntax errors sighted.

Assignment produces a fairly good narrative to support factual analysis of companies operational and financial risks by reviewing the relevant company ‘websites’ & Wikipedia sources in a limited manner to produce necessary details of accounting and management decisions , which have reasonably explained as to demonstrate its significance, but a bit inconsistent, when drawing comparisons within the segment. Some errors spotted in grammar and syntax

Fairly reasonable understanding demonstrated when commenting on judgements and estimates analyzing the potential impact of each type of risks within organization. Application and critical analysis to be demonstrated for risk management.. Some inconsistencies in grammar & syntax observed.

Assignment produces a poor review in support of factual data analysis with respect to company’s operational and financial performance. Evidence presented is of limited manner in not reviewing necessary Annual Reports to produce required details of accounting and management decisions .Explanations are in a language that is not fluent to contain inaccurate grammar Some errors & inconsistencies sighted in information produced.

Presentation is poor in structure relevant concepts when reviewing the judgements and estimates and includes errors in grammar and syntax. Not very coherent as language is inconsistent.

Assignment fails to provide any significant review to support factual data analysis with respect to company’s operational and financial risks. Structure, language grammar and presentation of information is not of an acceptable standard including faulty syntax.

Purpose of the analysis to present necessary views and opinions on judgements and estimated presented in poor and disorderly manner. Language is unclear and incorrect usage of grammar and syntax.

Assess how firms manage financial risk (25%)

Assignment produces an excellent analysis of the company’s performance which includes relevant information on financial risk management , which have been explained as to their role, comparisons provided and proposed reasons for changes, differences with comparisons and means of improvement by understanding management of the risk exposures, hedging risk exposures, foreign currency risk and potential impact of risk management tools, supported with reviewing recent research articles.

Assignment produces a very good analysis of the company’s performance which includes relevant information on financial risk management , which have been explained as to their roles, comparisons, proposed reasons for change, differences with comparisons and means of improvement

Assignment produces an analysis of the company’s performance which includes relevant information on financial risk management , which have been explained as to their roles, comparisons and proposed reasons for change, differences with comparisons and means of improvement

Assignment produces a limited analysis of the company’s performance which misses some of the key elements and supporting detail.

Assignment produces a limited analysis of the company’s performance which misses most of the key elements and supporting detail.

Understand the Governance of Risk Management

(20%)

Assignment produces a clear and concise critical analysis of the best practices in corporate governance. This analysis recognizes changing economic environments, interdependence of functional units. Demonstrate interrelationship between risk management strategies, this can be supported with a diagrammatic representation to enhance the understanding. Excellent clarity of expression. Consistent/ accurate use of grammar and spelling using an academic writing style. Presentation standard of the assignment is excellent; consistent with academic protocol. Referencing clear, relevant and consistently accurate using the Harvard system

Assignment produces a clear and concise analysis of the best practices in corporate governance. This analysis recognizes some of the issues around the changing economic environments, interdependence of functional units within the company. Thoughts and ideas clearly expressed. Grammar and spelling accurate and fluent. Presentation overall of good standard with few errors in grammar and syntax. Referencing relevant and mostly accurate using the Harvard system.

Assignment produces an analysis of some the best practices in corporate governance. This analysis recognizes some of the issues around the changing economic environments, interdependence of functional units. Presentation has limitations including some errors in grammar and syntax Minor inconsistencies and inaccuracies in referencing using the Harvard system

Assignment produces an analysis of a few best practices in corporate governance. This analysis fails to recognize the main issues around the changing economic environments, weakness with interdependence of functional units. Meaning apparent but language not always fluent, grammar and spelling is often inaccurate.

Presentation is poor in structure and includes errors in grammar and syntax. Referencing present having many inconsistencies and inaccuracies

Assignment fails to produce an analysis of the best practices in corporate governance. This analysis fails to recognize the main issues around the changing economic environments, interdependence of functional units. Purpose and meaning of assignment unclear. Language, grammar and spelling poor. Structure and presentation is not of an acceptable standard including faulty grammar and syntax. Referencing mainly inaccurate or absent

Understand the modern portfolio theory and capital asset pricing model

(20%)

Excellent Academic Debates are presented when reviewing necessary challenges and inherent difficulties in decision-making using modern portfolio theory, Markowitz and CAPM model. Markowitz frontier to be included in the form of a diagram or graph. CAPM model can be supported with equation or graph. The clarity is excellent and supported with adequate citations.

Harvard Referencing System followed in a systematic and accurate manner.

Sound Academic Debates are presented when reviewing necessary challenges and inherent difficulties in decision-making process using modern portfolio theory, Markowitz and CAPM model. Markowitz frontier to be included in the form of a diagram or graph. CAPM model can be supported with equation or graph. Fair understanding demonstrated through these diagrams and charts.

Errors in Harvard Referencing, along with minor flaws grammar and syntax observed.

Suitable recommendations post reviewing each academic theory.

Reasonably Good Academic Debates are presented when reviewing necessary challenging and inherent difficulties in decision-making of process using modern portfolio theory, Markowitz and CAPM model.

Markowitz frontier to be included in the form of a diagram or graph. CAPM model can be supported with equation or graph

Limited Harvard Referencing & recommendations are placed post reviewing each academic theory. Errors in Grammar and syntax

The purpose of this task does not meet acceptable standards. Lack of Academic debates sighted. Limited understanding exhibited with poor language carrying confused meaning and no structure or pattern followed when discussing the relevant investment appraisal techniques. Poor Grammar and syntax errors observed

Recommendations are not in line with the academic thinking to support investment appraisal techniques for supporting long term decision-making.

The information placed fails to meet desired expected standard. Language, structure and presentation of thoughts are not fluent and is unclear. Poor use of grammar and syntax

image1.jpg

image2.jpg