Week # 3
Vladimire25
Spring20227600-Week3updatedrubric.docx
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide DNP students with the skills to perform literature research for the science of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention in population health, including health promotion and screening, relate these to Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives.
Course Outcomes
This assignment documents students' ability to meet the following course outcomes.
· Recommend epidemiological principles to analyze health problems and identify communities and populations at risk.
· Utilize appropriate public health terminology necessary for Intra/interprofessional collaboration in advanced nursing practice.
End of Program Student Learning Outcomes
· Apply Clinical Scholarship and Analytical Methods for Evidence-Based Practice
· Use Information Systems/Technology and Patient Care Technology for the Improvement and Transformation of Health Care
Leadership-Related Role Specific Professional Competencies
· Demonstrate ability to influence behaviors by achieving outcomes
· Demonstrate professionalism
· Demonstrate knowledge of the health care environment
Due Date: Submit to the Moodle by Saturday of the end Week 3 at 11:59 p.m. ET.
Points: This assignment is worth a total of 100 points.
Requirements
· To complete this application, you will need to access the Miami Regional College virtual library database. Following databases: CINAHL Complete Database, MEDLINE Complete Database, LIRN, and so forth. Our Librarian is available to help on campus from Monday to Friday, 7:30 am to 9:00 pm & Saturday, 8:00 am to 3:00 pm. Feel free to use the APA template provided for this assignment in Moodle week #3. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to your professor or DNP mentor or post your question in the Q/A forum on Moodle. We are here to help.
· This assignment is worth 100 points and will be graded on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. This assignment will be graded on the quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria and rubric.
· APA format and effective writing are required for the paper. Use your APA manual or Purdue Owl to check and correct your formatting. Use Grammarly, Tutor Source, and the grammar and spelling check on your Word Processor and criteria for effective writing to assure that your paper has been well written. APA format is required, with both a title page and reference page.
· Create your manuscript using the version of Microsoft Word. You can tell that the document is saved as an MS Word document because it will end in “.docx.”
· Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. You may post any questions about this paper under the Q & A Forum.
· The length of the project report is to be no fewer than four and no greater than six pages, excluding the title page and reference pages.
· You will submit this paper through Turnitin. A Turnitin similarity score of 20% or less is expected.
· Present a minimum of six current scholarly references that are five years old or less.
· The textbook required for this course may be used as a reference for this assignment but does not count towards the required minimum number of scholarly references.
Directions and Grading Criteria
|
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
|
Introduction: Topic was clearly identified, background related to topic, and statistical data given. |
10 |
10 |
Introduces the purpose of your paper without using the header introduction. |
|
Description of an evidence-based project / research that utilized primary level of prevention. This includes the definition of primary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome. |
15 |
15 |
When describing evidenced-based project / research that utilized primary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of primary level of prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome. |
|
Excellent description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Secondary level of prevention. This should include the definition of secondary level of prevention target population, intervention, and outcome |
15 |
15 |
When describing evidenced-based project / research that utilized secondary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of secondary level of prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome. |
|
Excellent description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Tertiary level of prevention. This includes the definition of tertiary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome |
15 |
15 |
When describing evidenced-based project / research that utilized tertiary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of tertiary level of prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome. |
|
Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives and DNP essentials |
15 |
15 |
The student relates the findings from the literature of each level of prevention to Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives and DNP essentials. |
|
Provide an excellent summary of the main point of the content of the paper.
|
10 |
10 |
The student provides a summary of the main point of the content of the paper. |
|
Clarity of writing |
10 |
10 |
Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure; no spelling errors or typographical errors; organized around the required components using appropriate headers. |
|
APA format & Use of a minimum of six current scholarly references. (10 points) |
10 |
10 |
All information taken from another source (even if summarized) appropriately cited in the report (including citation of interview) and listed in references using APA (7th ed.) format 1. Document setup 2. Title and reference pages Citations in the text and references |
|
Total: |
100 |
100 |
A quality report will meet or exceed all the above requirements. |
Doctor of Nursing Practice Program
Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Assignment DNP7600 Population-based Health and Health Care Health Disparities
DNP 7600 Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Assignment
|
Population-based Health and Health Care Health Disparities DNP7600 – Week #3 Contributors from the DNP team: Dr. Coke, Dr. Anny Dionne, Dr. Karen Perez, Dr. Amarilys Gonzalez, Dr. Itzel Vega Crespo, Dr. Angel Garcia, Dr. David Trabanco, & Ivania Grennier.
|
4 |
Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Somewhat Meet Criteria |
Does Not Meet Criteria |
|
Introduction
(10 points) |
Excellence introduction: Topic was clearly identified, background related to topic, and statistical data given.
10 points |
Good introduction: Topic was clearly identified, background related to topic, and statistical data given.
7 points |
Somewhat good introduction: Topic was somewhat identified, background related to topic, and statistical data given.
4 points |
Poor introduction: Topic was not clearly identified, background related to topic, and statistical data was not stated.
0 point |
|
Primary level of prevention
(15 points) |
Excellent description of an evidence-based project / research that utilized primary level of prevention. This includes the definition of primary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome.
15 points |
Good description of an evidence-based project / research that utilized primary level of prevention. This includes the definition of primary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome.
10 points |
Description of an evidence-based project / research that utilized primary level of prevention. This does not include some of the following: the definition of primary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome.
6 points |
No or poor description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Tertiary level of prevention. Does not include any of the following: the definition of primary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome
0 point |
|
Secondary level of prevention
15 points |
Excellent description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Secondary level of prevention. This should include the definition of secondary level of prevention target population, intervention, and outcome 15 points |
Good description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Tertiary level of prevention. This includes the definition of secondary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome
10 points |
Description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Tertiary level of prevention. This does not include some of the following: the definition of secondary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome
6 points |
No or poor description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Tertiary level of prevention. Does not include any of the following: the definition of secondary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome
0 point |
|
Tertiary level of prevention
(15 points) |
Excellent description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Tertiary level of prevention. This includes the definition of tertiary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome 15 points |
Good description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Tertiary level of prevention. This includes the definition of tertiary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome
10 points |
Description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Tertiary level of prevention. This does not include some of the following: the definition of tertiary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome
6 points |
No or poor description of an evidence-based project / research that was used in Tertiary level of prevention. Does not include any of the following: the definition of tertiary level of prevention, target population, intervention, and outcome
0 point |
|
Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives and DNP essentials
(15 points) |
Excellent incorporation of Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives were identified, and related DNP essentials identified. 15 points |
Good incorporation of Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives were identified, and related DNP essentials identified.
10 points |
Basic incorporation of Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives were identified, and related DNP essentials identified.
6 points |
No or poor incorporation of Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives were identified, and related DNP essentials identified.
0 point |
|
Conclusion
(10 points) |
Provide an excellent summary of the main point of the content of the paper. 10 points |
Provide a good summary of the main point of the content of the paper.
7 points |
Provide a basic summary of the main point of the content of the paper.
4 points |
Provide little summary of the main point of the content of the paper.
0 point |
|
Clarity of writing
(10 points) |
Excellent use of standard English showing original thought; no spelling or grammar errors; well organized with proper flow of meaning 10 points |
Most of the evidence of own expression and competent use of language; no more than three spelling or grammar errors; well organized thoughts and concepts 7 points |
Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language; no more than three spelling or grammar errors; well organized thoughts and concepts
4 points |
Language needs development; four or more spelling and/or grammar errors; poorly organized thoughts and concepts
0 point |
|
APA format & Use of a minimum of six current scholarly references. (10 points) |
APA format is correct with no more than 1–2 minor errors Use of a minimum of six current scholarly references.
10 points |
Three to five errors in APA format and/or 1–2 citations missing. Use of a minimum of four to five current scholarly references.
7 points |
Six to eight errors in APA format and/or 1–2 citations missing. Use of a minimum of three current scholarly references.
4 points |
APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations missing Use none to two scholarly references: or use of outdated scholarly references. 0 point |
|
|
Total Points Possible = __100 points |
