Reflection 4
SOCIAL MEDIA
Spotting Misinformation On
Social Media Is Increasingly
Challenging
Peter Suciu Contributor Follow
Aug 2, 2021, 03:56pm EDT
Listen to article 8 minutes
Whether it is about the presidential election, climate change, or Covid-19 vaccines and the
delta ... [+] NURPHOTO VIA GETTY IMAGES
Whether it is about the presidential election, climate change, or
Covid-19 vaccines and the delta variant, misinformation continues
to spread rampantly across social media. According to a Pew
New!
Follow this author to improve your
content experience.
Got it!
Research Service study from January, more than eight-in-ten U.S.
adults (86 percent) said they get their news from a smartphone. It
is easy to see why misinformation continues to spread.
While we may expect, even demand that the social platforms crack
down on misinformation, there is little likelihood that Facebook,
Twitter or YouTube will ever stamp out it. One reason is that it
would take full-time policing of virtually all content, but then there
is also the fact that these platforms depend on continued use.
Simply put, misinformation gets clicks.
We see so much misinformation because the platforms have no real
interest in deterring it," explained technology and
telecommunications analyst Roger Entner of Recon Analytics.
"It is really easy and free to join the platform, there is no profit in
deleting the misinformation and preventing provocateurs to post
it," Entner warned.
"Actually, the platforms profit from it because the more outrageous
the content the more people interact with it – this type of
'engagement' is what the platforms are looking for; people reacting
to things. It doesn't matter if it's true or false as long as they
engage," Entner added. "There is also no downside in the
anonymous multimedia world, but even when high profile people
spread lies, there are no repercussions. Everything gets sacrificed
on the altar of monetization through engagement."
Spotting Not Stopping The Misinformation
Since it can't – and likely won't– be stopped, then the best course of
action is spotting it. This may not be as easy as it sounds, because
misinformation is often presented as news and/or fact. In some
cases, it can be wrong by misunderstanding, whilst in other cases it
is misleading by design
MORE FROM FORBES ADVISOR
Best Travel Insurance Companies
By Amy Danise Editor
Best Covid-19 Travel Insurance Plans
By Amy Danise Editor
"Bad information comes in two flavors, unintentional and
intentional. The latter, intentional disinformation, is far more
dangerous," said William V. Pelfrey, Jr., Ph.D., professor in the
Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs at Virginia
Commonwealth University.
"There are many persons who purposefully distribute inaccurate
information in an attempt to influence outcomes, such as an
election," said Pelfrey. "Undermining social confidence during a
time of Covid can disrupt the economy, influence employment, and
negatively impact public health. Some countries, including Russia
and China, have sophisticated disinformation organizations, which
work hard to undermine the United States, thereby elevating other
countries."
ho to believe becomes a problem, too, when there is rampant
contradictory information. This has been made worse as the nation
is so deeply divided, and trust of the "other side" is at an all-time
low.
"Human nature is to simply turn away when things get confusing,"
added Pelfrey.
If the government is telling you to get vaccinated, and social media
is telling you that vaccines and Covid are a hoax, the easiest thing to
do is ignore all of it. That leads to tremendous public health risk,"
he warned. "The smart thing to do is assess the source. What data
support the assertion? Is this fact – based on published, peer-
reviewed research – or opinion? Opinion is often hard to
differentiate from fact as many portray opinion as fact; especially
those soliciting attention, or votes, or your money."
Tips For Spotting Disinformation
There are now ways to quickly spot disinformation, including how
credible the source is – not just on this topic, but past events and
stories as well. In other words, if the source on social media was
wrong in the past that doesn't make them an expert this time
around.
"There are three things that I rely on as my 'go-tos' as quick checks
for patients," said Dr. Donna Gregory, senior lecturer within the
School of Nursing at Regis College. "Who is posting it? What
information are they sharing? What is their intent? In terms of who
is posting it, you want to look at the qualifications and potential for
bias. This is true for both individuals and organizations. For the
information to be credible, the individual or organization should
have credentials that are related to the field. For example, an
infectious disease provider or a healthcare organization that
specializes in infections disease would be credible sources."
The second is what information are they sharing, Gregory added.
Is the information data based on recent studies or information
from science? Or is it a post about one specific case or anecdotal
story," she pondered. "Finally, what is the intent of the person or
group posting? Is the intent to share information based on current
research and science? Are they trying to sell you something? Does
the post generate fear or distrust? Disinformation is more likely to
want to push you in one direction or another, instead of just
sharing information. While it isn't fool proof, considering these
questions together can help you determine if the information is
meant to spread disinformation."
Fact Checking
A common misconception today is that fact checking is often
opinion-based, yet as the very term suggests, it is about checking
the facts. However, fact checking doesn't mean disagreeing with all
the data that counters your argument and only supporting the ones
that agree.
n social media, it is all too common for someone to use a single
source to make or back up an argument while disregarding all the
other facts. That in turn leads to such a spread of misinformation.
If the information comes from a single person, it is opinion—not
fact," said Pelfrey. "My wife saw a friend's post which sounded
scientific, and was written by someone claiming to be an expert,
who turned out to be a part-time pharmacy employee. Not a
scientist."
The problem is made worse as it is makes rounds via social media.
In the John Hughes' film Ferris Bueller's Day Off there is the joke,
"He's sick. My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend
heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with a girl who
saw Ferris pass-out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty
serious."
That sort of "source" almost flies on social media!
The trappings of expertise are easily fabricated—be skeptical when
reading anything and consider the author's motivation," added
Pelfrey. "Is the author relaying the findings of scientists or are they
trying to push you towards an ideological position?"
And as noted, don't trust one source, especially those that may
seem controversial.
Ferris Bueller - He's SickFerris Bueller - He's Sick
"The main way to check accuracy is to review multiple sources for
the same information," said Gregory. "If you find information about
the delta variant on a news site, can you find this same information
on the CDC website? What about other health care organizations
such as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease? If
your friend shares information about the vaccines, can you find the
same information on the FDA website or other organizations such
as the World Health Organization? If the information is consistent
across multiple, credible sources than it is likely reliable
information based on evidence."
Follow me on Twitter.
Peter Suciu
I am a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen
magazines, newspapers and websites. I covered the... Read More
Follow
ADVERTISEMENT
Editorial Standards Reprints & Permissions