|
CRITERIA
|
EXEMPLARY
|
ACCOMPLISHED
|
DEVELOPING
|
BEGINNING
|
MARK
|
|
Introduction and Conclusion
(4)
|
Well-planned introduction & conclusion with a description of the SPICES tool and its application & usefulness. Student clearly describes how he/she prepared for the interview, and provides a concise client history. Conclusion concisely summarizes the findings and logically finalizes assignment.
(4)
|
Includes an introduction & conclusion, and some description of the SPICES tool. Includes a description of student preparation and some client history.
(3)
|
Lacking a comprehensive introduction or conclusion,and/or there is minimal description of the tool, its usefulness or application. There is some basic description of interview preparation and client information
(2)
|
Introduction and/or conclusion is missing;and/or Minimal description of the tool, its usefulness or application and/or student provides very little description of interview preparation and client info
(1)
|
/4
|
|
Interview Process
(4)
|
A summary of all findings of the tool is provided, and the student provides an in-depth description of the experience (considers, for example, barriers, challenges, learning gained, utilization of alternate resources for information)
(4)
|
A summary of most aspects of the tool is provided; the student provides some description of the experience & some thought is given to barriers, challenges, learning, or alternate resources.
(3)
|
A brief summary of some aspects of the tool is provided and/or the student provides an undeveloped description of the experience.
(2)
|
No summary of findings is provided, or a very brief summary is provided; there is minimal description of the experience.
(1)
|
/4
|
|
Problem Identification
(8)
|
Student provides a detailed description of the focus area of concern, as well as rationale for choosing this issue. Description and discussion are clear, and demonstrate insight and critical thinking.
(8)
|
Student provides some description of the focus area, and some rationale for choosing this issue. Discussion is clear and there is some demonstration of critical thinking.
(6)
|
There is some superficial description of the focus area of concern, and attempts to provide rationale for choosing this issue. The discussion lacks clarity and requires further consideration.
(4)
|
There is minimal description of the focus area, and little or no rationale for choosing this area. Minimal discussion and description of the issues.
(2)
|
/8
|
|
Research and Interventions
(14)
|
At least 3 relevant and current references (at least 1 RNAO BPG OR scholarly article) are used to analyze the problem and develop comprehensive, applicable, personalized nursing interventions INCLUDING RATIONALE. There is clear evidence of analysis and thinking/ understanding.
(14)
|
3 relevant and current RNAO BPG, scholarly article or course text references are used to analyze the problem identified, and some relevant nursing interventions have been developed.
(10.5)
|
3 relevant and current references are used to begin to consider the problem identified, and some nursing interventions have been identified.
(7)
|
Does not meet minimum requirements; less than 3 references are used OR the nursing interventions are not appropriate OR the nursing interventions are listed without consideration for this particular client.
(3.5)
|
/14
|
|
Interview Questions
(3)
|
The list of interview questions & answers is included. The student develops effective questions that are detailed, open-ended and of high quality.
(3)
|
The list of interview questions & answers is included. The student includes focused, mostly open-ended questions that elicit some important information
(2.25)
|
The list of interview questions & answers is included. Some open-ended questions are included, but require further development.
(1.5)
|
The list of interview questions OR answers is not included OR the student develops questions that are ineffective and/or closed-ended
(0.75)
|
/3
|
|
Format & Style
(4)
|
Writing is clear, concise and free from spelling or grammar errors.
(4)
|
There are a few minor spelling or grammar errors, though writing is overall clear and concise.
(3)
|
There are multiple spelling or grammar errors, or significant errors impacting clarity of the message.
(2)
|
Substantial spelling or grammar errors which impede the ability to understand the message.
(1)
|
/4
|
|
APA
(3)
|
Title Page, Reference list and in-text references are complete and accurate, using current APA Guidelines and PN Program Guide. Follows assignment instructions completely.
(3)
|
Title page, Reference list and in-text references are mostly complete and accurate. Follows most assignment instructions
(2.25)
|
There are multiple errors in APA Format of title page, Reference list, and in-text references. Does not follow assignment instructions
(1.5)
|
Title page, reference list and in-text references are incomplete or inaccurate and do not follow Guidelines. Assignment does not follow written instructions.
(0.75)
|
/3
|
|
FINAL MARK
|
|
|
|
|
/40
|
KUBE1
SPICESRubricsummer2018.docx
